Transmembrane signalling by a hybrid protein: communication from the domain of chemoreceptor Trg that recognizes sugar-binding proteins to the kinase/phosphatase domain of osmosensor EnvZ.

Chemoreceptor Trg and osmosensor EnvZ of Escherichia coli share a common transmembrane organization but have essentially unrelated primary structures. We created a hybrid gene coding for a protein in which Trg contributed its periplasmic and transmembrane domains as well as a short cytoplasmic segment and EnvZ contributed its cytoplasmic kinase/phosphatase domain. Trz1 transduced recognition of sugar-occupied, ribose-binding protein by its periplasmic domain into activation of its cytoplasmic kinase/phosphatase domain as assessed in vivo by using an ompC-lacZ fusion gene. Functional coupling of sugar-binding protein recognition to kinase/phosphatase activity indicates shared features of intramolecular signalling in the two parent proteins. In combination with previous documentation of transduction of aspartate recognition by an analogous fusion protein created from chemoreceptor Tar and EnvZ, the data indicate a common mechanism of transmembrane signal transduction by chemoreceptors and EnvZ. Signalling through the fusion proteins implies functional interaction between heterologous domains, but the minimal sequence identity among relevant segments of EnvZ, Tar, and Trg indicates that the link does not require extensive, specific interactions among side chains. The few positions of identity in those three sequences cluster in transmembrane segment 1 and the short chemoreceptor sequence in the cytoplasmic part of the hybrid proteins. These regions may be particularly important in physical and functional coupling. The specific cellular conditions necessary to observe ligand-dependent activation of Trz1 can be understood in the context of the importance of phosphatase control in EnvZ signalling and limitations on maximal receptor occupancy in binding protein-mediated recognition.     

Bacterial chemoreceptors of different length classes signal independently

Bacterial chemoreceptors sense environmental stimuli and govern cell movement by transmitting the information to the flagellar motors. The highly conserved cytoplasmic domain of chemoreceptors consists in an alpha‐helical hairpin that forms in the homodimer a coiled‐coil four‐helix bundle. Several classes of chemoreceptors that differ in the length of the coiled‐coil structure were characterized. Many bacterial species code for chemoreceptors that belong to different classes, but how these receptors are organized and function in the same cell remains an open question. E. coli cells normally code for single class chemoreceptors that form extended arrays based on trimers of dimers interconnected by the coupling protein CheW and the kinase CheA. This structure promotes effective coupling between the different receptors in the modulation of the kinase activity. In this work, we engineered functional derivatives of the Tsr chemoreceptor of E. coli that mimic receptors whose cytoplasmic domain is longer by two heptads. We found that these long Tsr receptors did not efficiently mix with the native receptors and appeared to function independently. Our results suggest that the assembly of membrane‐bound receptors of different specificities into mixed clusters is dictated by the length‐class to which the receptors belong, ensuring cooperative function only between receptors of the same class.     

Phenol sensing by Escherichia coli chemoreceptors: a nonclassical mechanism

The four transmembrane chemoreceptors of Escherichia coli sense phenol as either an attractant (Tar) or a repellent (Tap, Trg, and Tsr). In this study, we investigated the Tar determinants that mediate its attractant response to phenol and the Tsr determinants that mediate its repellent response to phenol. Tar molecules with lesions in the aspartate-binding pocket of the periplasmic domain, with a foreign periplasmic domain (from Tsr or from several Pseudomonas chemoreceptors), or lacking nearly the entire periplasmic domain still mediated attractant responses to phenol. Similarly, Tar molecules with the cytoplasmic methylation and kinase control domains of Tsr still sensed phenol as an attractant. Additional hybrid receptors with signaling elements from both Tar and Tsr indicated that the transmembrane (TM) helices and HAMP domain determined the sign of the phenol-sensing response. Several amino acid replacements in the HAMP domain of Tsr, particularly attractant-mimic signaling lesions at residue E248, converted Tsr to an attractant sensor of phenol. These findings suggest that phenol may elicit chemotactic responses by diffusing into the cytoplasmic membrane and perturbing the structural stability or position of the TM bundle helices, in conjunction with structural input from the HAMP domain. We conclude that behavioral responses to phenol, and perhaps to temperature, cytoplasmic pH, and glycerol, as well, occur through a general sensing mechanism in chemoreceptors that detects changes in the structural stability or dynamic behavior of a receptor signaling element. The structurally sensitive target for phenol is probably the TM bundle, but other behaviors could target other receptor elements.     

Cross-linking evidence for motional constraints within chemoreceptor trimers of dimers

Chemotactic behavior in bacteria relies on the sensing ability of large chemoreceptor clusters that are usually located at the cell pole. In Escherichia coli, chemoreceptors exhibit higher-order interactions within those clusters based on a trimer-of-dimers organization. This architecture is conserved in a variety of other bacteria and archaea, implying that receptors in many microorganisms form trimer-of-dimer signaling teams. To gain further insight into the assembly and dynamic behavior of receptor trimers of dimers, we used in vivo cross-linking targeted to cysteine residues at various positions that define six different levels along the cytoplasmic signaling domains of the aspartate and serine chemoreceptors, Tar and Tsr, respectively. We found that the cytoplasmic domains of these receptors are close to each other near the trimer contact region at the cytoplasmic tip and lie farther apart as the receptor dimers approach the cytoplasmic membrane. Tar and Tsr reporter sites within the same or closely adjacent levels readily formed mixed cross-links, whereas reporters located different distances from the tip did not. These findings indicate that there are no significant vertical displacements of one dimer with respect to the others within the trimer unit. Attractant stimuli had no discernible effect on the cross-linking efficiency of any of the reporters tested, but a strong osmotic stimulus reproducibly enhanced cross-linking at most of the reporter sites, indicating that individual dimers may move closer together under this condition.     

Tuning a bacterial chemoreceptor with protein-membrane interactions

Chemoreceptors in Escherichia coli are homodimeric transmembrane proteins that convert environmental stimuli into intracellular signals controlling flagellar motion. Chemoeffectors bind to the extracellular (periplasmic) domain of the receptors, whereas their cytoplasmic domain mediates signaling and adaptation. The second transmembrane helix (TM2) connects these two domains. TM2 contains an aliphatic core flanked by amphipathic aromatic residues that have specific affinity for polar-hydrophobic membrane interfaces. We previously showed that Trp-209, near the cytoplasmic end of TM2, helps maintain the normal baseline-signaling state of the aspartate chemoreceptor (Tar) and that Tyr-210 plays an auxiliary role in this control. We have now repositioned the Trp-209/Tyr-210 pair in single-residue increments about the cytoplasmic polar-hydrophobic interface. Changes from WY-2 to WY+1 modulate the baseline-signaling state of the receptor in predictable and incremental steps that can be compensated by adaptive methylation/demethylation. Greater displacements, as in WY-3, WY+2, and WY+3, bias the receptor to the off kinase-inhibiting state or the on kinase-stimulating state, respectively, to a degree that cannot be fully compensated by the adaptation system. Aromatic residues analogous to Trp-209/Tyr-210 are present in other chemoreceptors and many transmembrane sensor kinases, where they may serve a similar function.     

Helical distribution of the bacterial chemoreceptor via colocalization with the Sec protein translocation machinery

In Escherichia coli, chemoreceptor clustering at a cell pole seems critical for signal amplification and adaptation. However, little is known about the mechanism of localization itself. Here we examined whether the aspartate chemoreceptor (Tar) is inserted directly into the polar membrane by using its fusion to green fluorescent protein (GFP). After induction of Tar-GFP, fluorescent spots first appeared in lateral membrane regions, and later cell poles became predominantly fluorescent. Unexpectedly, Tar-GFP showed a helical arrangement in lateral regions, which was more apparent when a Tar-GFP derivative with two cysteine residues in the periplasmic domain was cross-linked to form higher oligomers. Moreover, similar distribution was observed even when the cytoplasmic domain of the double cysteine Tar-GFP mutant was replaced by that of the kinase EnvZ, which does not localize to a pole. Observation of GFP-SecE and a translocation-defective MalE-GFP mutant, as well as indirect immunofluorescence microscopy on SecG, suggested that the general protein translocation machinery (Sec) itself is arranged into a helical array, with which Tar is transiently associated. The Sec coil appeared distinct from the MreB coil, an actin-like cytoskeleton. These findings will shed new light on the mechanisms underlying spatial organization of membrane proteins in E. coli.     

Role of threonine residue 154 in ligand recognition of the tar chemoreceptor in Escherichia coli.

The Tar chemoreceptor of Escherichia coli mediates attractant responses to aspartate, maltose, and phenol, repellent responses to Ni2+ and Co2+, and thermoresponses. To understand the role of threonine residue 154, which is located in the ligand-binding domain of Tar, we replaced the residue with serine, isoleucine, and proline by site-directed mutagenesis. The replacements caused reductions in aspartate sensing but had only a small effect on maltose sensing and almost no effect on phenol sensing, repellent sensing, and thermosensing. These results indicate that Thr-154 of Tar is rather specifically involved in aspartate sensing. The reductions in the response threshold for aspartate by the replacements with serine, isoleucine, and proline were less than 1, about 2, and more than 5 orders of magnitude, respectively. When the corresponding threonine residue in the Tsr chemoreceptor was replaced with the same amino acids, roughly similar reductions in the response threshold for serine resulted. Thus, these threonine residues seem to have a common role in detecting the aspartate and serine attractant families. A mechanism by which these chemoreceptors detect the amino acid attractants is discussed.     

The carboxyl-terminal linker is important for chemoreceptor function

Sensory adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis is mediated by chemoreceptor methylation and demethylation. In Escherichia coli, methyltransferase CheR and methylesterase CheB bind both substrate sites and a carboxyl-terminal pentapeptide sequence carried by certain receptors. Pentapeptide binding enhances enzyme action, an enhancement required for effective adaptation and chemotaxis. Pentapeptides are linked to the conserved body of chemoreceptors through a notably variable sequence of 30-35 residues. We created nested deletions from the distal end of this linker in chemoreceptor Tar. Chemotaxis was eliminated by deletion of 20-40 residues and reduced by shorter deletions. This did not reflect generalized disruption, because all but the most extremely truncated receptors activated kinase, were substrates for adaptational modification and performed transmembrane signalling. In contrast, linker truncations reduced rates of adaptational modification in parallel with chemotaxis. We concluded the linker is important for chemotaxis because of its role in adaptational modification. Effects of linker truncations on CheR binding to receptor-borne pentapeptide implied linker (i) makes pentapeptide available to modification enzymes by separation from the helical receptor body, and (ii) is a flexible arm allowing dual binding of enzyme to pentapeptide and modification site. The data suggest linker and the helix from which it emerges are structurally dynamic.     

Modeling the transmembrane domain of bacterial chemoreceptors

Bacterial chemoreceptors signal across the membrane by conformational changes that traverse a four-helix transmembrane domain. High-resolution structures are available for the chemoreceptor periplasmic domain and part of the cytoplasmic domain but not for the transmembrane domain. Thus, we constructed molecular models of the transmembrane domains of chemoreceptors Trg and Tar, using coordinates of an unrelated four-helix coiled coil as a template and the X-ray structure of a chemoreceptor periplasmic domain to establish register and positioning. We tested the models using the extensive data for cross-linking propensities between cysteines introduced into adjacent transmembrane helices, and we found that many aspects of the models corresponded with experimental observations. The one striking disparity, the register of transmembrane helix 2 (TM2) relative to its partner transmembrane helix 1, could be corrected by sliding TM2 along its long axis toward the periplasm. The correction implied that axial sliding of TM2, the signaling movement indicated by a large body of data, was of greater magnitude than previously thought. The refined models were used to assess effects of inter-helical disulfides on the two ligand-induced conformational changes observed in alternative crystal structures of periplasmic domains: axial sliding within a subunit and subunit rotation. Analyses using a measure of disulfide potential energy provided strong support for the helical sliding model of transmembrane signaling but indicated that subunit rotation could be involved in other ligand-induced effects. Those analyses plus modeled distances between diagnostic cysteine pairs indicated a magnitude for TM2 sliding in transmembrane signaling of several angstroms.     

Dual recognition of the bacterial chemoreceptor by chemotaxis-specific domains of the CheR methyltransferase

Adaptation to persisting stimulation is required for highly sensitive detection of temporal changes of stimuli, and often involves covalent modification of receptors. Therefore, it is of vital importance to understand how a receptor and its cognate modifying enzyme(s) modulate each other through specific protein-protein interactions. In the chemotaxis of Escherichia coli, adaptation requires methylation of chemoreceptors (e.g. Tar) catalyzed by the CheR methyltransferase. CheR binds to the C-terminal NWETF sequence of a chemoreceptor that is distinct from the methylation sites. However, little is known about how CheR recognizes its methylation sites or how it is distributed in a cell. In this study, we used comparative genomics to demonstrate that the CheR chemotaxis methyltransferase contains three structurally and functionally distinct modules: (i) the catalytic domain common to a methyltransferase superfamily; (ii) the N-terminal domain; and (iii) the beta-subdomain of the catalytic domain, both of which are found exclusively in chemotaxis methyltransferases. The only evolutionary conserved motif specific to CheR is the positively charged face of helix alpha2 in the N-terminal domain. The disulfide cross-linking analysis suggested that this face interacts with the methylation helix of Tar. We also demonstrated that CheR localizes to receptor clusters at cell poles via interaction of the beta-subdomain with the NWETF sequence. Thus, the two chemotaxis-specific modules of CheR interact with distinct regions of the chemoreceptor for targeting to the receptor cluster and for recognition of the substrate sites, respectively.     

Inversion of thermosensing property of the bacterial receptor Tar by mutations in the second transmembrane region

The aspartate chemoreceptor Tar of Escherichia coli serves as a warm sensor that produces attractant and repellent signals upon increases and decreases in temperature, respectively. However, increased levels of methylation of the cytoplasmic domain of Tar resulting from aspartate binding convert Tar to a cold sensor with the opposite signaling behavior. Detailed analyses of the methylation sites, which are located in two separate alpha-helices (MH1 and MH2), have suggested that intra- and/or intersubunit interactions of MH1 and MH2 play a critical role in thermosensing. These interactions may be influenced by binding of aspartate, which could trigger some displacement of MH1 through the second transmembrane region (TM2). As an initial step toward understanding the role of TM2 in thermosensing, we have examined the thermosensing properties of 43 mutant Tar receptors with randomized TM2 sequences (residues 190-210). Among them, we identified one mutant receptor (Tar-I2) that functioned as a cold sensor in the absence of aspartate. This is the first example of attractant-independent inversion of thermosensing in Tar. Further analyses identified the minimal essential divergence from the wild-type Tar sequence (Q191V-W192R-Q193C) required for the inverted response. Thus, displacements of TM2 seem to influence the thermosensing function of Tar.     

Clustering requires modified methyl-accepting sites in low-abundance but not high-abundance chemoreceptors of Escherichia coli

Chemotaxis signalling complexes of Escherichia coli, composed of chemoreceptors, CheA and CheW, form clusters located predominantly at cell poles. As the only kind of receptor in a cell, high-abundance receptors are polar and clustered whereas low-abundance chemoreceptors are polar but largely unclustered. We found that clustering was a function of the cytoplasmic, carboxyl-terminal domain and that effective clustering was conferred on low-abundance receptors by addition of the approximately 20-residue sequence from the carboxyl terminus of either high-abundance receptor. These sequences are different but share a carboxyl-terminal pentapeptide that enhances adaptational covalent modification and allows a physiological balance between modified and unmodified methyl-accepting sites, implying that receptor modification might influence clustering. Thus we investigated directly effects of modification state on chemoreceptor clustering. As the sole receptor type in a cell, low-abundance receptors were clustered only if modified, but high-abundance receptors were clustered independent of extent of modification. This difference could mean that the two receptor types are fundamentally different or that they are poised at different positions in the same conformational equilibrium. Notably, no receptor perturbation we tested altered a predominant location at cell poles, emphasizing a distinction between determinants of clustering and polar localization.     

The receptor-CheW binding interface in bacterial chemotaxis

The basic structural unit of the signaling complex in bacterial chemotaxis consists of the chemotaxis kinase CheA, the coupling protein CheW, and chemoreceptors. These complexes play an important role in regulating the kinase activity of CheA and in turn controlling the rotational bias of the flagellar motor. Although individual three-dimensional structures of CheA, CheW, and chemoreceptors have been determined, the interaction between chemoreceptor and CheW is still unclear. We used nuclear magnetic resonance to characterize the interaction modes of chemoreceptor and CheW from Thermotoga maritima. We find that chemoreceptor binding surface is located near the highly conserved tip region of the N-terminal helix of the receptor, whereas the binding interface of CheW is placed between the β-strand 8 of domain 1 and the β-strands 1 and 3 of domain 2. The receptor-CheW complex shares a similar binding interface to that found in the "trimer-of-dimers" oligomer interface seen in the crystal structure of cytoplasmic domains of chemoreceptors from Escherichia coli. Based on the association constants inferred from fast exchange chemical shifts associated with receptor-CheW titrations, we estimate that CheW binds about four times tighter to its first binding site of the receptor dimer than to its second binding site. This apparent anticooperativity in binding may reflect the close proximity of the two CheW binding surfaces near the receptor tip or further, complicating the events at this highly conserved region of the receptor. This work describes the first direct observation of the interaction between chemoreceptor and CheW.     

Internal Sense of Direction: Sensing and Signaling from Cytoplasmic Chemoreceptors

SUMMARY

Chemoreceptors sense environmental signals and drive chemotactic responses in Bacteria and Archaea. There are two main classes of chemoreceptors: integral inner membrane and soluble cytoplasmic proteins. The latter were identified more recently than integral membrane chemoreceptors and have been studied much less thoroughly. These cytoplasmic chemoreceptors are the subject of this review. Our analysis determined that 14% of bacterial and 43% of archaeal chemoreceptors are cytoplasmic, based on currently sequenced genomes. Cytoplasmic chemoreceptors appear to share the same key structural features as integral membrane chemoreceptors, including the formations of homodimers, trimers of dimers, and 12-nm hexagonal arrays within the cell. Cytoplasmic chemoreceptors exhibit varied subcellular locations, with some localizing to the poles and others appearing both cytoplasmic and polar. Some cytoplasmic chemoreceptors adopt more exotic locations, including the formations of exclusively internal clusters or moving dynamic clusters that coalesce at points of contact with other cells. Cytoplasmic chemoreceptors presumably sense signals within the cytoplasm and bear diverse signal input domains that are mostly N terminal to the domain that defines chemoreceptors, the so-called MA domain. Similar to the case for transmembrane receptors, our analysis suggests that the most common signal input domain is the PAS (Per-Arnt-Sim) domain, but a variety of other N-terminal domains exist. It is also common, however, for cytoplasmic chemoreceptors to have C-terminal domains that may function for signal input. The most common of these is the recently identified chemoreceptor zinc binding (CZB) domain, found in 8% of all cytoplasmic chemoreceptors. The widespread nature and diverse signal input domains suggest that these chemoreceptors can monitor a variety of cytoplasmically based signals, most of which remain to be determined.     

Influence of Membrane Lipid Composition on a Transmembrane Bacterial Chemoreceptor

Most bacterial chemoreceptors are transmembrane proteins. Although less than 10% of a transmembrane chemoreceptor is embedded in lipid, separation from the natural membrane environment by detergent solubilization eliminates most receptor activities, presumably because receptor structure is perturbed. Reincorporation into a lipid bilayer can restore these activities and thus functionally native structure. However, the extent to which specific lipid features are important for effective restoration is unknown. Thus we investigated effects of membrane lipid composition on chemoreceptor Tar from Escherichia coli using Nanodiscs, small (∼10-nm) plugs of lipid bilayer rendered water-soluble by an annulus of “membrane scaffold protein.” Disc-enclosed bilayers can be made with different lipids or lipid combinations. Nanodiscs carrying an inserted receptor dimer have high protein-to-lipid ratios approximating native membranes and in this way mimic the natural chemoreceptor environment. To identify features important for functionally native receptor structure, we made Nanodiscs using natural and synthetic lipids, assaying extents and rates of adaptational modification. The proportion of functionally native Tar was highest in bilayers closest in composition to E. coli cytoplasmic membrane. Some other lipid compositions resulted in a significant proportion of functionally native receptor, but simply surrounding the chemoreceptor transmembrane segment with a lipid bilayer was not sufficient. Membranes effective in supporting functionally native Tar contained as the majority lipid phosphatidylethanolamine or a related zwitterionic lipid plus a rather specific proportion of anionic lipids, as well as unsaturated fatty acids. Thus the chemoreceptor is strongly influenced by its lipid environment and is tuned to its natural one.     

Mutationally altered signal output in the Nart (NarX-Tar) hybrid chemoreceptor

Signal-transducing proteins that span the cytoplasmic membrane transmit information about the environment to the interior of the cell. In bacteria, these signal transducers include sensor kinases, which typically control gene expression via response regulators, and methyl-accepting chemoreceptor proteins, which control flagellar rotation via the CheA kinase and CheY response regulator. We previously reported that a chimeric protein (Nart) that joins the ligand-binding, transmembrane, and linker regions of the NarX sensor kinase to the signaling and adaptation domains of the Tar chemoreceptor elicits a repellent response to nitrate and nitrite. As with NarX, nitrate evokes a stronger response than nitrite. Here we show that mutations targeting a highly conserved sequence (the P box) in the periplasmic domain alter chemoreception by Nart and signaling by NarX similarly. In particular, the G51R substitution converts Nart from a repellent receptor into an attractant receptor for nitrate. Our results underscore the conclusion that the fundamental mechanism of transmembrane signaling is conserved between homodimeric sensor kinases and chemoreceptors. They also highlight the plasticity of the coupling between ligand binding and signal output in these systems.     

Four-helix bundle: a ubiquitous sensory module in prokaryotic signal transduction

MOTIVATION: Transmembrane chemoreceptors in Escherichia coli utilize ligand-binding domains for detecting various external signals. The structure of this domain in the E.coli aspartate receptor, Tar, is known and its signal transduction mechanism is under investigation. Current domain models for this important sensory module are inaccurate and, therefore, cannot reveal the distribution of this domain within the current genomic landscape. RESULTS: We carried out sensitive and exhaustive PSI-BLAST searches initiated with the sequence corresponding to a known structure of the four-helix, ligand-binding domain of the aspartate chemoreceptor. From the resulting sequences, we built a multiple sequence alignment for this domain family, which confirmed that the current TarH model is erroneous and fails to detect most of the domain homologs. In the process, we developed a technique that visualizes the secondary structure prediction of each protein sequence in order to improve the multiple sequence alignment. We found that the four-helix up-and-down bundle represents a large domain family and includes representatives of all major classes of prokaryotic signal transduction, namely histidine kinases, di-guanylate cyclases and chemotaxis receptors.     

Diagnostic cross-linking of paired cysteine pairs demonstrates homologous structures for two chemoreceptor domains with low sequence identity

Hundreds of bacterial chemoreceptors from many species have periplasmic, ligand‐recognition domains of approximately the same size, but little or no sequence identity. The only structure determined is for the periplasmic domain of chemoreceptor Tar from Salmonella and Escherichia coli. Do sequence‐divergent but similarly sized chemoreceptor periplasmic domains have related structures? We addressed this issue for the periplasmic domain of chemoreceptor Trg_E from E. coli, which has a low level of sequence similarity to Tar, by combining homology modeling and diagnostic cross‐linking between pairs of introduced cysteines. A homology model of the Trg_E domain was created using the homodimeric, four‐helix bundle structure of the Tar_S domain from Salmonella. In this model, we chose four pairs of positions at which introduced cysteines would be sufficiently close to form disulfides across each of four different helical interfaces. For each pair we chose a second pair, in which one cysteine of the original pair was shifted by one position around the helix and thus would be less favorably placed for disulfide formation. We created genes coding for proteins containing four such pairs of cysteine pairs and investigated disulfide formation in vivo as well as functional consequences of the substitutions and disulfides between neighboring helices. Results of the experimental tests provided strong support for the accuracy of the model, indicating that the Trg_E periplasmic domain is very similar to the Tar_S domain. Diagnostic cross‐linking of paired pairs of introduced cysteines could be applied generally as a stringent test of homology models.     

Maltose chemoreceptor of Escherichia coli: interaction of maltose-binding protein and the tar signal transducer.

The maltose chemoreceptor in Escherichia coli consists of the periplasmic maltose-binding protein (MBP) and the Tar signal transducer, which is localized in the cytoplasmic membrane. We previously isolated strains containing malE mutations that cause specific defects in the chemotactic function of MBP. Four of these mutations have now been characterized by DNA sequence analysis. Two of them replace threonine at residue 53 of MBP with isoleucine (MBP-TI53), one replaces an aspartate at residue 55 with asparagine (MBP-DN55), and the fourth replaces threonine at residue 345 with isoleucine (MBP-TI345). The chemotactic defects of MBP-TI53 and MBP-DN55, but not of MBP-TI345, are suppressed by mutations in the tar gene. Of the tar mutations, the most effective suppressor (isolated independently three times) replaces Arg-73 of Tar with tryptophan. Two other tar mutations that disrupt the aspartate chemoreceptor function of Tar also suppress the maltose taxis defects associated with MBP-TI53 and MBP-DN55. One of these mutations introduces glutamine at residue 73 of Tar, the other replaces arginine at residue 69 of Tar with cysteine. These results suggest that regions of MBP that include residues 53 to 55 and residue 345 are important for the interaction with Tar. In turn, arginines at residues 69 and 73 of Tar must be involved in the recognition of maltose-bound MBP and/or in the production of the attractant signal generated by Tar in response to maltose-bound MBP.     

Clustering of the Chemoreceptor Complex in Escherichia coli Is Independent of the Methyltransferase CheR and the Methylesterase CheB

The Escherichia coli chemoreceptors and their associated cytoplasmic proteins, CheA and CheW, cluster predominantly at the cell poles. The nature of the clustering remains a mystery. Recent studies suggest that CheR binding to and/or methylation of the chemoreceptors may play a role in chemoreceptor complex aggregation. In this study, we examined the intracellular distribution of the chemoreceptors by immunoelectron microscopy in strains lacking either the methyltransferase CheR or the methylesterase CheB. The localization data revealed that, in vivo, aggregation of the chemoreceptor complex was independent of either CheR or CheB.