Chloroplasts can move in any direction to avoid strong light

Chloroplasts migrate in response to different light intensities. Under weak light, chloroplasts gather at an illuminated area to maximize light absorption and photosynthesis rates (the accumulation response). In contrast, chloroplasts escape from strong light to avoid photodamage (the avoidance response). Photoreceptors involved in these phenomena have been identified in Arabidopsis thaliana and Adiantum capillus-veneris. Chloroplast behavior has been studied in detail during the accumulation response, but not for the avoidance response. Hence, we analyzed the chloroplast avoidance response in detail using dark-adapted Adiantum capillus-veneris gametophyte cells and partial cell irradiation with a microbeam of blue light. Chloroplasts escaped from an irradiated spot. Both duration of this response and the distance of the migrated chloroplasts were proportional to the total fluence irradiated. The speed of movement during the avoidance response was dependent on the fluence rate, but the speed of the accumulation response towards the microbeam from cell periphery was constant irrespective of fluence rate. When a chloroplast was only partially irradiated with a strong microbeam, it moved away towards the non-irradiated region within a few minutes. During this avoidance response two additional microbeam irradiations were applied to different locus of the same chloroplast. Under these conditions the chloroplast changed the moving direction after a lag time of a few minutes without rolling. Taken together, these findings indicate that chloroplasts can move in any direction and never have an intrinsic polarity. Similar phenomenon was observed in chloroplasts of Arabidopsis thaliana palisade cells.     

Phytochrome- and blue-light-absorbing pigment-mediated directional movement of chloroplasts in dark-adapted prothallial cells of fernAdiantum as analyzed by microbeam irradiation

When prothalli ofAdiantum capillus-veneris L. were kept for 2 d in the dark, chloroplasts gathered along the anticlinal walls (Kagawa and Wada, 1994, J Plant Res 107: 389–398). In these dark-adapted prothallial cells, irradiation with a microbeam (10 gm in diameter) of red (R) or blue light (B) for 60 s moved the chloroplasts towards the irradiated locus during a subsequent dark period. Chloroplasts located less than 20 gm from the center of the R microbeam (18 J·m^–2) moved towards the irradiated locus. The higher the fluence of the light, the greater the distance from which chloroplasts could be attracted. The B microbeam was less effective than the R microbeam. Chloroplasts started to move anytime up to 20 min after the R stimulus, but with the B microbeam the effect of the stimulus was usually apparent within 10 min after irradiation. The velocity of chloroplast migration was independent of light-fluence in both R and B and was about - 0.3 m·min^–1 between 15 min and 30 min after irradiation. Whole-cell irradiation with far-red light immediately after R- and B-microbeam irradiations demonstrated that these responses were mediated by phytochrome and a blue-light-absorbing pigment, respectively. Sequential treatment with R and B microbeams, whose fluence rates were less than the threshold values when applied separately, resulted in an additive effect and induced chloroplast movement, strongly suggesting that signals from phytochrome and the blue-light-absorbing pigment could interact at some point before the induction of chloroplast movement.Abbreviations B blue light - FR far-red light - IR infrared light - R red light     

Brief irradiation with red or blue light induces orientational movement of chloroplasts in dark-adapted prothallial cells of the fernAdiantum

Orientational movement of chloroplasts was induced by a brief irradiation with red light (R) or blue light (B) in dark-adapted prothallial cells ofAdiantum, whose chloroplasts had gathered along the cell dividing wall (i.e., the anticlinal wall). When the whole dark-adapted prothallia were irradiated from a horizontal direction (i.e., from their lobes) with horizontally vibrating polarized R (H pol. R) for 10 or 3 min, the chloroplast left the anticlinal walls and spread over the prothallial surface (i.e., the periclinal walls) within 1–2 hr after the onset of irradiation, returning to the anticlinal wall (dark-position) within 10 hr. However, vertically vibrating polarized R (V pol. R) for 10 min did not induce the movement towards periclinal walls. The R effect was cancelled by non-polarized far-red light (FR) irradiation just after the R irradiation. Irradiation with H pol. B for 10 or 3 min but not with V pol. B could also induce a similar movement of chloroplasts, although the chloroplasts returned within 4 hr. The effect of H pol. B, however, was not cancelled by the subsequent FR irradiation. When a part of the dark-adapted cell at the prothallial surface was irradiated from above with a microbeam of R or B for 1 min, chloroplasts of the cell in the dark-position moved towards the irradiated locus in subsequent darkness. However, in the neighboring cells, orientational movement was not induced by either R or B microbeams. These results show that in dark-adapted prothallial cells, both brief irradiation with R and B can induce chloroplast photo-orientation and that the photoreceptors are phytochrome and blue light-absorbing pigment, respectively. It is also clear that effects of both R and B irradiation do not transfer to neighboring cells.     

Blue- and red-light action in photoorientation of chloroplasts in Adiantum protonemata

An action spectrum for the low-fluencerate response of chloroplast movement in protonemata of the fern Adiantum capillus-veneris L. was determined using polarized light vibrating perpendicularly to the protonema axis. The spectrum had several peaks in the blue region around 450 nm and one in the red region at 680 nm, the blue peaks being higher than the red one. The red-light action was suppressed by nonpolarized far-red light given simultaneously or alternately, whereas the bluelight action was not. Chloroplast movement was also induced by a local irradiation with a narrow beam of monochromatic light. A beam of blue light at low energy fluence rates (7.3·10^-3-1.0 W m^-2) caused movement of the chloroplasts to the beam area (positive response), while one at high fluence rates (10 W m^-2 and higher) caused movement to outside of the beam area (negative response). A red beam caused a positive response at fluence rates up to 100 W m^-2, but a negative response at very high fluence rates (230 and 470 W m^-2). When a far-red beam was combined with total background irradiation with red light at fluence rates causing a low-fluence-rate response in whole cells, chloroplasts moved out of the beam area. When blue light was used as background irradiation, however, a narrow far-red beam had no effect on chloroplast distribution. These results indicate that the light-oriented movement of Adiantum chloroplasts is caused by red and blue light, mediated by phytochrome and another, unidentified photoreceptor(s), respectively. This movement depends on a local gradient of the far-red-absorbing form of phytochrome or of a photoexcited blue-light photoreceptor, and it includes positive and negative responses for both red and blue light.Abbreviations BL blue light - FR far-red light - Pfr far-red-absorbing form of phytochrome - Pr red-absorbing form of phytochrome - R red light - UV ultraviolet     

Speed of signal transfer in the chloroplast accumulation response

Chloroplast photorelocation movement is important for plants to perform efficient photosynthesis. Phototropins were identified as blue-light receptors for chloroplast movement in Arabidopsis thaliana and in the fern Adiantum capillus-veneris, whereas neochrome functions as a dual red/blue light receptor in the latter. However, the signal transduction pathways involved in chloroplast movement remain to be clarified. To investigate the kinetic properties of signalling from these photoreceptors to the chloroplasts, we deduced the speed of signal transfer using Adiantum capillus-veneris gametophytes. When a region of dark-adapted gametophyte cells was subjected to microbeam irradiation, chloroplasts moved towards the irradiated area even in subsequent darkness. We therefore recorded the movement and calculated the speeds of signal transfer by time-lapse imaging. Movement speeds under red or blue light were similar, e.g., about 1.0 μm min⁻¹ in prothallial cells. However, speeds varied according to cell polarity in protonemal cells. The speed of signal transfer from the protonemal apex to the base was approximately 0.7 μm min⁻¹, but roughly 2.3 μm min⁻¹ in the opposite direction. The speed of signal transfer in Arabidopsis thaliana mesophyll cells was approximately 0.8 μm min⁻¹ by comparison. Surprisingly, chloroplasts located farthest away from the microbeam were found to move faster than those in close proximity to the site of irradiation both in Adiantum capillus-veneris and A. thaliana.     

Chloroplast proliferation based on their distribution and arrangement inAdiantum protonemata growing under red light

Chloroplast proliferation was investigated inAdiantum protonemata growing under continuous red light. Cell division is absent when cells are grown under red light. The chloroplast number increases as the cell length increases, therefore the chloroplasts divide in the absence of cell division. Chloroplasts in the basal part of the filamentous protonemal cell migrate gradually toward the cell apex, but there is no large net migration from the tip to the base or vice versa, indicating that chloroplast division takes place in the apical part of the protonemata. Chloroplast number in the apical 100 μm was maintained at about 200 during cell growth at least over eight days. The chloroplasts were either dumbbell- or ellipsoid-shaped. Dumbbell-shaped chloroplasts are abundant everywhere in a protonema, ranging from 30 to 50% of the total chloroplasts. The dumbbell-shaped chloroplasts attached to or very close to the plasma membrane seem to be the ones that are dividing but the dumbbell-shaped ones in the other regions do not divide. These data support the hypothesis that a signal from the plasma membrane induces the dumbbell-shaped chloroplasts to divide.     

Photoorientation of chloroplasts in protonemal cells of the fernAdiantum as analyzed by use of a video-tracking system

Photoorientation of chloroplasts mediated by phytochrome and blue light-absorbing pigment in protonemal cells of the fernAdiantum was studied by use of inhibitors of the cytoskeleton and was analyzed with a video-tracking system. The photoorientation responses were inhibited by cytochalasin B and by N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) but not by colchicine, suggesting that the photomovement depends on the actomyosin system. In the dark, chloroplasts moved randomly, being independent of one another. After induction of photoorientation by polarized red light, most chloroplasts that had been located at the margin of cells moved almost perpendicularly to the cell axis toward the site of photoorientation. This type of movement was hardly ever observed in the dark. Under polarized blue light, such specific movements were less evident but were still observed in the case of a few chloroplasts. After photoorientation was complete, chloroplasts still moved in random directions but their mobility was lower than that in the dark, indicating the presence of some anchoring mechanism. When EGTA was applied, photoorientation was inhibited but this inhibition was overcome by the addition of CaCl₂. Video-tracking of chloroplasts in the dark revealed that the mobility of chloroplasts was higher in medium with EGTA than in medium with EGTA plus CaCl₂ and that many of the chloroplasts moved jerkily in the medium with EGTA. This change in the nature of movements was also seen under polarized light, resulting in the disturbance of photoorientation. These results indicate that the inhibition of photoorientation at low concentrations of Ca²⁺ ions may be due to change in the nature of chloroplast movement.     

Intracellular chloroplast photorelocation in the moss Physcomitrella patens is mediated by phytochrome as well as by a blue-light receptor

 The light-induced intracellular relocation of chloroplasts was examined in red-light-grown protonemal cells of the moss Physcomitrella patens. When irradiated with polarized red or blue light, chloroplast distribution in the cell depended upon the direction of the electrical vector (E-vector) in both light qualities. When the E-vector was parallel to the cross-wall (i.e. perpendicular to the protonemal axis), chloroplasts accumulated along the cross-wall; however, no accumulation along the cross-wall was observed when the E-vector was perpendicular to it (i.e. parallel to the protonemal axis). When a part of the cell was irradiated with a microbeam of red or blue light, chloroplasts accumulated at or avoided the illumination point depending on the fluence rate used. Red light of 0.1–18 W m⁻² and blue light of 0.01–85.5 W m⁻² induced an accumulation response (low-fluence-rate response; LFR), while an avoidance response (high-fluence-rate response; HFR) was induced by red light of 60 W m⁻² or higher and by blue light of 285 W m⁻². The red-light-induced LFR and HFR were nullified by a simultaneous background irradiation of far-red light, whereas the blue-light-induced LFR and HFR were not affected at all by this treatment. These results show, for the first time, that dichroic phytochrome, as well as the dichroic blue-light receptor, is involved in the chloroplast relocation movement in these bryophyte cells. Further, the phytochrome-mediated responses but not the blue-light responses were revealed to be lost when red-light-grown cells were cultured under white light for 2 d. Received: 7 September 1999 / Accepted: 15 October 1999     

Photoinduction of formation of circular structures by microfilaments on chloroplasts during intracellular orientation in protonemal cells of the fernAdiantum capillus-veneris

Summary Changes in the organization of cortical actin microfilaments during phytochrome-mediated and blue light-induced photoorientation of chloroplasts were investigated by rhodamine-phalloidin staining in protonemal cells of the fernAdiantum capillusveneris. Low- and high-fluence rate responses were induced by partial irradiation of individual cells with a microbeam of 20 m in width. In the low-fluence rate responses to red and blue light, a circular structure composed of microfilaments was induced on the chloroplast concentrated in the irradiated region, on the side facing the plasma membrane, as already reported in the case of the low-fluence rate response induced by polarized red or blue light. Such a structure was not observed on the chloroplasts located far from the microbeam. Time-course studies revealed that the structure was induced after the chloroplasts gathered in the illuminated region and that the structure disappeared before chloroplasts moved out of this region when the microbeam was turned off. In the high-fluence rate response to blue light, chloroplasts avoided the irradiated site but accumulated in the shaded area adjacent the edges of microbeam. The circular structure made of microfilaments was also observed on the chloroplasts gathered in the area and it showed the same behavior with respect to its appearance and disappearance during a light/dark regime as in the case of the low-fluence rate response. However, no such circular structure was observed in the high-fluence rate response to red light, in which case the chloroplasts also avoided the illuminated region but no accumulation in the adjacent areas was induced. These results indicate that the circular structure composed of microfilaments may play a role in the anchorage of the chloroplast during intracellular photo-orientation.     

Photoinduction of circular F-actin on chloroplast in a fern protonemal cell

Summary Circular F-actin on a photooriented chloroplast was observed by rhodamine-phalloidin staining in the fernAdiantum protonemal cells in which phytochrome- or blue light receptor-mediated intracellular photoorientation of chloroplasts was induced. The circular structure located along the edge of chloroplast on the side facing the plasma membrane but not on the opposite side. Most of the chloroplasts in protonemal cell have dumbbell-shape and the circular ring-like structure was found on each half of the dumbbell. The structure was not observed in the cells which were kept in the dark, indicating the change of F-actin organization by the light condition. Possible role of the structure on the anchorage of chloroplast in its intracellular photoorientation was discussed.     

Chloroplast actin filaments organize meshwork on the photorelocated chloroplasts in the moss <Emphasis Type="Italic">Physcomitrella patens</Emphasis>

Cytoskeleton dynamics during phototropin-dependent chloroplast photorelocation movement was analyzed in protonemal cells of actin- and microtubule-visualized lines of Physcomitrella patens expressing GFP- or tdTomato-talin and GFP-tubulin. Using newly developed epi- and trans-microbeam irradiation systems that permit fluorescence observation of the cell under blue microbeam irradiation inducing chloroplast relocation, it was revealed that meshwork of actin filaments formed at the chloroplast-accumulating area both in the avoidance and accumulation movements. The structure disappeared soon when blue microbeam was turned off, and it was not induced under red microbeam irradiation that did not evoke chloroplast relocation movement. In contrast, no apparent change in microtubule organization was detected during the movements. The actin meshwork was composed of short actin filaments distinct from the cytoplasmic long actin cables and was present between the chloroplasts and plasma membrane. The short actin filaments emerged from around the chloroplast periphery towards the center of chloroplast. Showing highly dynamic behavior, the chloroplast actin filaments (cp-actin filaments) were rapidly organized into meshwork on the chloroplast surface facing plasma membrane. The actin filament configuration on a chloroplast led to the formation of actin meshwork area in the cell as the chloroplasts arrived at and occupied the area. After establishment of the meshwork, cp-actin filaments were still highly dynamic, showing appearance, disappearance, severing and bundling of filaments. These results indicate that the cp-actin filaments have significant roles in the chloroplast movement and positioning in the cell.     

Visualization of a rapid,red/far-red light-dependent reaction by centrifuge microscopy

Summary Using a centrifuge microscope with stroboscopic illumination, we examined the effects of light irradiation on the passive movement of chloroplasts in dark-adapted mesophyll cells ofVallisneria gigantea. While irradiation with red light accelerates the passive gliding of chloroplasts produced by centrifugal force, irradiation with far-red light negates this effect. Irradiation with blue light does not accelerate the passive gliding, while red light is completely effective even in the presence of 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea, an inhibitor of photosynthesis. An apparently active movement of chloroplasts can be induced by irradiation with red or blue light only in the presence of the far-red light-absorbing form of phytochrome. The significance of the reaction in the light with respect to the regulation of cytoplasmic streaming is discussed.Abbreviations APW artificial pond water - CMS centrifuge microscope of the stroboscopic type - DCMU 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea - Pfr phytochrome, far-red light-absorbing form - Pr phytochrome, red light-absorbing form     

Chloroplast movement in Mougeotia induced by blue light pulses

The profile-to-face chloroplast movement in the green alga Mougeotia has been induced by strong blue and near-ultraviolet light pulses (6 J m^-2). Simultaneously, strong red or far-red light (10 W m^-2) was applied perpendicularly to the inducing beam. The response was measured photometrically. Against the far-red background the reciprocity law was found to hold for pulse durations varying two orders of magnitude. The action spectrum exhibited a maximum near 450 nm and a distinct increase in near-ultraviolet. The time-course and the spectral dependence of pulse responses of chloroplasts in Mougeotia were similar to those recorded for other plants which are sensitive only to blue. This points to an alternative sensor system active in the short-wavelength region in addition to the phytochrome system.Abbreviations FR far-red light - Pr red absorbing form of phytochrome - Pfr far-red absorbing form of phytochrome - R red light This paper is dedicated to the memory of Professor Jan Zurzycki     

Chloroplast movement: dissection of events downstream of photo- and mechano-perception

The study of chloroplast photorelocation movement is progressing rapidly now that mutants for chloroplast movement have become available in Arabidopsis thaliana. However, mechanistic approaches in cell biology still stand to elucidate the mechanisms and regulations of such movement. The fern Adiantum capillus-veneris and the moss Physcomitrella patens are particularly suitable materials for analyzing the kinetics of intracellular chloroplast movement. In these plants, chloroplast movement is induced by red light as well as blue light, mediated by phytochrome and blue light receptor, respectively. In this paper, we review the unique force-generating system for chloroplast motility in P. patens. In addition to light-induced chloroplast movement, we also summarize mechanically induced chloroplast movement in these plants and the motility systems involved. Finally, the different dependency of mechano- and photo-relocation movement on external Ca²⁺ is discussed. Electronic Publication     

Structural and functional properties of the coleoptile chloroplast: Photosynthesis and photosensory transduction

Recent studies have shown that guard cell and coleoptile chloroplasts appear to be involved in blue light photoreception during blue light-dependent stomatal opening and phototropic bending. The guard cell chloroplast has been studied in detail but the coleoptile chloroplast is poorly understood. The present study was aimed at the characterization of the corn coleoptile chloroplast, and its comparison with mesophyll and guard cell chloroplasts. Coleoptile chloroplasts operated the xanthophyll cycle, and their zeaxanthin content tracked incident rates of solar radiation throughout the day. Zeaxanthin formation was very sensitive to low incident fluence rates, and saturated at around 800–1000 mol m^–2 s^–1. Zeaxanthin formation in corn mesophyll chloroplasts was insensitive to low fluence rates and saturated at around 1800 mol m^–2 s^–1. Quenching rates of chlorophyll a fluorescence transients from coleoptile chloroplasts induced by saturating fluence rates of actinic red light increased as a function of zeaxanthin content. This implies that zeaxanthin plays a photoprotective role in the coleoptile chloroplast. Addition of low fluence rates of blue light to saturating red light also increased quenching rates in a zeaxanthin-dependent fashion. This blue light response of the coleoptile chloroplast is analogous to that of the guard cell chloroplast, and implicates these organelles in the sensory transduction of blue light. On a chlorophyll basis, coleoptile chloroplasts had high rates of photosynthetic oxygen evolution and low rates of photosynthetic carbon fixation, as compared with mesophyll chloroplasts. In contrast with the uniform chloroplast distribution in the leaf, coleoptile chloroplasts were predominately found in the outer cell layers of the coleoptile cortex, and had large starch grains and a moderate amount of stacked grana and stroma lamellae. Several key properties of the coleoptile chloroplast were different from those of mesophyll chloroplasts and resembled those of guard cell chloroplasts. We propose that the common properties of guard cell and coleoptile chloroplasts define a functional pattern characteristic of chloroplasts specialized in photosensory transduction.Abbreviations Ant or A antheraxanthin - dv/dt fluorescence quenching rate - Fm maximum yield of fluorescence with all PS II reaction centers closed - Fo yield of instantaneous fluorescence with all PS II reaction centers open - Vio or V violaxanthin - Zea or Z zeaxanthin     

Chloroplasts move towards the nearest anticlinal walls under dark condition

Chloroplasts change their intracellular positions in response to their light environment. Under darkness, chloroplasts assume special positions that are different from those under light conditions. Here, we analyzed chloroplast dark positioning using Adiantum capillus-veneris gametophyte cells. When chloroplasts were transferred into darkness, during the first 1–5 h, they moved towards the anticlinal cell walls bordering the adjacent cells rather rapidly. Then, they slowed down and accumulated at the anticlinal walls gradually over the following 24–36 h. The chloroplast movements could be roughly classified into two different categories: initial rapid straight movement and later, slow staggering movement. When the chloroplast accumulation response was induced in dark-adapted cells by partial cell irradiation with a microbeam targeted to the center of the cells, chloroplasts moved towards the beam spot from the anticlinal walls. However, when the microbeam was switched off, they moved to the nearest anticlinal walls and not to their original positions if they were not the closest, indicating that they know the direction of the nearest anticlinal wall and do not have particular areas that they migrate to during dark positioning.     

Blue light-induced chloroplast relocation in Arabidopsis thaliana as analyzed by microbeam irradiation

Chloroplast relocation in mesophyll cells of Arabidopsis thaliana was observed microscopically and analyzed by microbeam irradiation. Chloroplasts located along the anticlinal walls in dark-adapted cells. When part of a cell was irradiated with a microbeam of high fluence rate blue light (B) simultaneously with background red light (R) on the whole cell, the chloroplasts moved towards the B-irradiated area, but did not enter the beam. The background R illumination activated cytoplasmic motility as well as chloroplast movement. Without R illumination, there was little chloroplast relocation. In light-adapted cells in which the chloroplasts were spread over the cell surface perpendicular to the incident light, R-illumination had the same effect. Under background R, the chloroplasts moved out of the area irradiated with a B microbeam of 8 or 30 W m(-2) (avoidance response), but chloroplasts outside the beam moved towards the area irradiated with the B microbeam (accumulation response). These results suggest that the signals for accumulation and avoidance responses were generated in a single cell by high fluence rate B. cry1cry2, npq1 and nph1 mutants showed B-induced chloroplast relocation. Both the accumulation and avoidance responses were observed in all the mutants, although in the nph1 mutant, the sensitivity of accumulation movement was slightly lower than that of the wild type. We discuss the possible photoreceptor for B-induced chloroplast relocation.     

Chloroplast avoidance movement is not functional in plants grown under strong sunlight

Chloroplast movement in nine climbing plant species was investigated. It is thought that chloroplasts generally escape from strong light to avoid photodamage but accumulate towards weak light to perform photosynthesis effectively. Unexpectedly, however, the leaves of climbing plants grown under strong sunlight showed very low or no chloroplast photorelocation responses to either weak or strong blue light when detected by red light transmittance through leaves. Direct observations of Cayratia japonica leaves, for example, revealed that the average number of chloroplasts in upper periclinal walls of palisade tissue cells was only 1.2 after weak blue‐light irradiation and almost all of the chloroplasts remained at the anticlinal wall, the state of chloroplast avoidance response. The leaves grown under strong light have thin and columnar palisade tissue cells comparing with the leaves grown under low light. Depending on our analyses and our schematic model, the thinner cells in a unit leaf area have a wider total plasma membrane area, such that more chloroplasts can exist on the plasma membrane in the thinner cells than in the thicker cells in a unit leaf‐area basis. The same strategy might be used in other plant leaves grown under direct sunlight.     

Blue light-induced chloroplast relocation

Chloroplast relocation movement is induced by blue light in most plants tested. Under weak light, chloroplasts move toward a brighter area in a cell (called low-fluence-rate response or accumulation movement), but they avoid strong light and move away from the light (called high-fluence-rate response or avoidance movement). Recently, mutants deficient in the chloroplast avoidance movement were isolated from Arabidopsis thaliana. The results of mutant analyses revealed that the phototropin photoreceptors phot1 and phot2 both control chloroplast accumulation while phot2 alone controls the avoidance movements.     

Polarotropism and Photomovement of Chloroplasts in the Protonemata of the Ferns Pteris and Adiantum: Evidence for the Possible Lack of Dichroic Phytochrome in Pteris

The actions of red and blue light in the photomovement of chloroplastsand the polarotropic response were studied in the protonemataof the homosporous ferns Pteris vittata L. and Adiantum capillus-venerisL. In Pteris, polarotropism could be induced with blue lightbut not with red light, while both colors of light were effectivein Adiantum protonemata. The photomovement of chloroplasts inthe two species studied by both polarized light and microbeamirradiation, also revealed similar responses to red and bluelight as the polarotropism; i.e. both colors of light were effectivein Adiantum but only blue light was active in Pteris. The resultsin Adiantum were consistent with previous results, which ledto the conclusion that both phytochrome and a blue light-absorbingpigment are involved in the two responses (Kadota et al. 1982,1984, Hayami et al. 1986, Yatsuhashi et al. 1985). By contrast,phytochrome is not involved in either polarotropism or chloroplastmovement in Pteris. Since the phytochrome system is evidentlyactive in every other photoresponses so far investigated inPteris as well as in Adiantum, the present study suggests thata phytochrome system specific to polarotropism and to photomovementof chloroplasts is absent in Pteris. Discussions are presentedon the possible involvement of two phytochrome populations ina fern gametophyte cell and on the possible lack of dichroicphytochrome in Pteris. (Received October 7, 1988; Accepted March 8, 1989)