Cocaine modulates pathways for photic and nonphotic entrainment of the mammalian SCN circadian clock

Cocaine abuse is highly disruptive to circadian physiological and behavioral rhythms. The present study was undertaken to determine whether such effects are manifest through actions on critical photic and nonphotic regulatory pathways in the master circadian clock of the mouse suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). Impairment of SCN photic signaling by systemic (intraperitoneal) cocaine injection was evidenced by strong (60%) attenuation of light-induced phase-delay shifts of circadian locomotor activity during the early night. A nonphotic action of cocaine was apparent from its induction of 1-h circadian phase-advance shifts at midday. The serotonin receptor antagonist, metergoline, blocked shifting by 80%, implicating a serotonergic mechanism. Reverse microdialysis perfusion of the SCN with cocaine at midday induced 3.7 h phase-advance shifts. Control perfusions with lidocaine and artificial cerebrospinal fluid had little shifting effect. In complementary in vitro experiments, photic-like phase-delay shifts of the SCN circadian neuronal activity rhythm induced by glutamate application to the SCN were completely blocked by cocaine. Cocaine treatment of SCN slices alone at subjective midday, but not the subjective night, induced 3-h phase-advance shifts. Lidocaine had no shifting effect. Cocaine-induced phase shifts were completely blocked by metergoline, but not by the dopamine receptor antagonist, fluphenazine. Finally, pretreatment of SCN slices for 2 h with a low concentration of serotonin agonist (to block subsequent serotonergic phase resetting) abolished cocaine-induced phase shifts at subjective midday. These results reveal multiple effects of cocaine on adult circadian clock regulation that are registered within the SCN and involve enhanced serotonergic transmission.     

Photic and nonphotic inputs to the diurnal circadian clock

Diurnal animals occupy a different temporal niche from nocturnal animals and are consequently exposed to different amounts of light as well as different dangers. Accordingly, some variation exists in the way that diurnal animals synchronize their internal circadian clock to match the external 24-hour daily cycle. First, though the brain mechanisms underlying photic entrainment are very similar among species with different daily activity patterns, there is evidence that diurnal animals are less sensitive to photic stimuli compared to nocturnal animals. Second, stimuli other than light that synchronize rhythms (i.e. nonphotic stimuli) can also entrain and phase shift daily rhythms. Some of the rules that govern nonphotic entrainment in nocturnal animals as well as the brain mechanisms that control nonphotic influences on rhythms do not appear to apply to diurnal animals, however. Some evidence supports the idea that arousal or activity plays an important role in entraining rhythms in diurnal animals, either during the light (active) or dark (inactive) phases, though no consistent pattern is seen. GABAergic stimulation induces phase shifts during the subjective day in both diurnal and nocturnal animals. In diurnal Arvicanthis niloticus (Nile grass rats), SCN GABA_A receptor activation at this time results in phase delays while in nocturnal animals phase advances are induced. It appears that the effect of GABA at this circadian phase results from the inhibition of period gene expression in both diurnal and nocturnal animals. Nonetheless, the resulting phase shifts are in opposite directions. It is not known what stimuli or behaviours ultimately induce changes in GABA activity in the SCN that result in alterations of circadian phase in diurnal grass rats. Taken together, studies such as these suggest that it may be problematic to apply the principles governing nocturnal nonphotic entrainment and its underlying mechanisms to diurnal species including humans.     

Serotonin agonist quipazine induces photic-like phase shifts of the circadian activity rhythm and c-Fos expression in the rat suprachiasmatic nucleus

Nonphotic stimuli can reset and entrain circadian activity rhythms in hamsters and mice, and serotonin is thought to be involved in the phase-resetting effects of these stimuli. In the present study, the authors examined the effect of the serotonin agonist quipazine on circadian activity rhythms in three inbred strains of rats (ACI, BH, and LEW). Furthermore, they investigated the effect of quipazine on the expression of c-Fos in the mammalian circadian pacemaker, the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). Quipazine reduced the amount of running wheel activity for 3 h after treatment, however, no long-term changes in tau and in the activity level were observed. More important, quipazine induced significant phase advances of the activity rhythm and c-Fos production in the SCN at the end of the subjective night (Circadian Time [CT] 22), whereas neither phase shifts nor c-Fos induction were observed during the subjective day. Quipazine injections also resulted in moderate phase delays at the beginning of the subjective night (CT 14). A similar phase-response characteristic typically can be observed for photic stimuli. By contrast, nonphotic stimuli normally produce phase advances during the subjective day. The present results suggest species differences between the hamster and the rat with respect to the serotonergic action on circadian timekeeping and indicate that serotonergic pathways play a role in the transmission of photic information to the SCN of rats.     

Phase shifting the hamster circadian clock by 15-minute dark pulses

The mammalian circadian pacemaker can be phase shifted by exposure to a period of darkness interrupting otherwise continuous light. Circadian phase shifting by dark pulses was interpreted originally as reflecting a photic mirror-image mechanism, but more recent observations suggest that dark pulse-induced phase shifting may be mediated by a nonphotic, behavioral state-dependent mechanism. The authors recently presented evidence indicating that the dark-pulse phase response curve (PRC) is in fact a complex function, reflecting both photic mirror image and nonphotic mechanisms at different phases of the circadian cycle. Previous studies of dark pulse-induced phase shifting have universally employed relatively long (2 to 6 h) pulses, which complicates PRC analysis due to the extended segment of the underlying PRC spanned by such a long pulse. The present study was therefore designed to examine the phase-shifting effects of brief 15-min dark pulses presented at both mid-subjective day and subjective dusk, and to explore the possible activity dependence of these effects by using physical restraint to prevent evoked locomotor activity. The results indicate that 15-min dark pulses are effective phase-shifting stimuli at both midday and dusk. Furthermore, as with longer dark pulses, phase shifting by 15-min dark pulses is completely blocked by physical restraint during subjective day but combines in a simple additive manner with the independent phase-shifting effect of restraint at subjective dusk.     

Loss of dexras1 alters nonphotic circadian phase shifts and reveals a role for the intergeniculate leaflet (IGL) in gene-targeted mice

Loss of Dexras1 in gene-targeted mice impairs circadian entrainment to light cycles and produces complex changes to phase-dependent resetting responses (phase shifts) to light. The authors now describe greatly enhanced and phase-specific nonphotic responses induced by arousal in dexras1(-/-) mice. In constant conditions, mutant mice exhibited significant arousal-induced phase shifts throughout the subjective day. Unusual phase advances in the late subjective night were also produced when arousal has little effect in mice. Bilateral lesions of the intergeniculate leaflet (IGL) completely eliminated both the nonphotic as well as the light-induced phase shifts of circadian locomotor rhythms during the subjective day, but had no effect on nighttime phase shifts. The expression of FOS-like protein in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) was not affected by either photic or nonphotic stimulation in the subjective day in either genotype. Therefore, the loss of Dexras1 (1) enhances nonphotic phase shifts in a phase-dependent manner, and (2) demonstrates that the IGL in mice is a primary mediator of circadian phase-resetting responses to both photic and nonphotic events during the subjective day, but plays a different functional role in the subjective night. Furthermore, (3) the change in FOS level does not appear to be a critical step in the entrainment pathways for either light or arousal during the subjective day. The cumulative evidence suggests that Dexras1 regulates multiple photic and nonphotic signal-transduction pathways, thereby playing an essential role modulating species-specific characteristics of circadian entrainment.     

Locomotor Activity Rhythm in the Field Mouse Mus booduga Phase-shifts to Melatonin Injections in a Dose-dependent Manner

Melatonin is known to shift the phase of the locomotor activity rhythm in the field mouse Mus booduga in accordance with a type-I phase response curve (PRC), with phase delays during the subjective day and phase advances during late subjective night and the early subjective day. At CT4 (circadian time 4; i.e. 16 hr. after activity onset) and CT22 of the circadian cycle, a single dose of melatonin (1 mg/kg) is known to evoke maximum delay and maximum advance phase-shifts, respectively. We investigated the dose-dependent responses of the circadian pacemaker of these mice to a single dose of melatonin at the times for maximum delay and maximum advance. The circadian pacemaker responsible for the locomotor activity rhythm in these mice responded to various doses of melatonin in a dose-dependent manner with the magnitude of phase shifts increasing with dose.     

Locomotor Activity Rhythm in the Field Mouse Mus booduga Phase-shifts to Melatonin Injections in a Dose-dependent Manner

Melatonin is known to shift the phase of the locomotor activity rhythm in the field mouse Mus booduga in accordance with a type-I phase response curve (PRC), with phase delays during the subjective day and phase advances during late subjective night and the early subjective day. At CT4 (circadian time 4; i.e. 16 hr. after activity onset) and CT22 of the circadian cycle, a single dose of melatonin (1 mg/kg) is known to evoke maximum delay and maximum advance phase-shifts, respectively. We investigated the dose-dependent responses of the circadian pacemaker of these mice to a single dose of melatonin at the times for maximum delay and maximum advance. The circadian pacemaker responsible for the locomotor activity rhythm in these mice responded to various doses of melatonin in a dose-dependent manner with the magnitude of phase shifts increasing with dose.     

Species Differences Between Hamsters and Rats with Regard to the Putative Role of Serotonin in the Circadian System

In mammals, circadian rhythms of locomotor activity and many other behavioral and physiological functions are controlled by an endogenous pacemaker located in the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). Among various other afferents, the SCN receives a dense serotonergic input from the mesencephalic raphe complex. Experimental evidence obtained so far in Syrian hamsters suggests that serotonin (5-HT) mimics the effect of nonphotic stimuli during subjective day and modulates photic input to the SCN during subjective night. These findings are consistent with a putative role of serotonergic pathways in the transmission of the state of arousal to the SCN. In this paper, we review recent evidence for different modes of 5-HT action and/or the involvement of different 5-HT receptor subtypes in hamsters and rats. In intact rats, 5-HT agonists induce photic-like phase shifts of locomotor activity and melatonin rhythms as well as c-Fos expression in the ventral SCN. These results suggest a role for 5-HT in the transmission of photic rather than nonphotic information to the rat SCN. Such a function of 5-HT would also explain why the circadian system of rats is less sensitive or even insensitive to nonphotic stimuli.     

Species Differences Between Hamsters and Rats with Regard to the Putative Role of Serotonin in the Circadian System

In mammals, circadian rhythms of locomotor activity and many other behavioral and physiological functions are controlled by an endogenous pacemaker located in the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). Among various other afferents, the SCN receives a dense serotonergic input from the mesencephalic raphe complex. Experimental evidence obtained so far in Syrian hamsters suggests that serotonin (5-HT) mimics the effect of nonphotic stimuli during subjective day and modulates photic input to the SCN during subjective night. These findings are consistent with a putative role of serotonergic pathways in the transmission of the state of arousal to the SCN. In this paper, we review recent evidence for different modes of 5-HT action and/or the involvement of different 5-HT receptor subtypes in hamsters and rats. In intact rats, 5-HT agonists induce photic-like phase shifts of locomotor activity and melatonin rhythms as well as c-Fos expression in the ventral SCN. These results suggest a role for 5-HT in the transmission of photic rather than nonphotic information to the rat SCN. Such a function of 5-HT would also explain why the circadian system of rats is less sensitive or even insensitive to nonphotic stimuli.     

Loss of dexras1 Alters Nonphotic Circadian Phase Shifts and Reveals a Role for the Intergeniculate Leaflet (IGL) in Gene-Targeted Mice

Loss of Dexras1 in gene-targeted mice impairs circadian entrainment to light cycles and produces complex changes to phase-dependent resetting responses (phase shifts) to light. The authors now describe greatly enhanced and phase-specific nonphotic responses induced by arousal in dexras1^?/? mice. In constant conditions, mutant mice exhibited significant arousal-induced phase shifts throughout the subjective day. Unusual phase advances in the late subjective night were also produced when arousal has little effect in mice. Bilateral lesions of the intergeniculate leaflet (IGL) completely eliminated both the nonphotic as well as the light-induced phase shifts of circadian locomotor rhythms during the subjective day, but had no effect on nighttime phase shifts. The expression of FOS-like protein in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) was not affected by either photic or nonphotic stimulation in the subjective day in either genotype. Therefore, the loss of Dexras1 (1) enhances nonphotic phase shifts in a phase-dependent manner, and (2) demonstrates that the IGL in mice is a primary mediator of circadian phase-resetting responses to both photic and nonphotic events during the subjective day, but plays a different functional role in the subjective night. Furthermore, (3) the change in FOS level does not appear to be a critical step in the entrainment pathways for either light or arousal during the subjective day. The cumulative evidence suggests that Dexras1 regulates multiple photic and nonphotic signal-transduction pathways, thereby playing an essential role modulating species-specific characteristics of circadian entrainment. (Author correspondence: ralph@psych.utoronto.ca)     

Nonphotic entrainment in a diurnal mammal, the European ground squirrel (Spermophilus citellus).

Entrainment by nonphotic, activity-inducing stimuli has been investigated in detail in nocturnal rodents, but little is known about nonphotic entrainment in diurnal animals. Comparative studies would offer the opportunity to distinguish between two possibilities. (1) If nonphotic phase shifts depend on the phase of the activity cycle, the phase response curve (PRC) should be about 180 degrees out of phase in nocturnal and diurnal mammals. (2) If nonphotic phase shifts depend on the phase of the pacemaker, the two PRCs should be in phase. We used the diurnal European ground squirrel (Spermophilus citellus) in a nonphotic entrainment experiment to distinguish between the two possibilities. Ten European ground squirrels were kept under dim red light (<1 lux) and 20 +/- 1 degrees C. During the entrainment phase of the experiment, the animals were confined every 23.5 h (T) to a running wheel for 3 h. The circadian rhythms of 6 squirrels entrained, 2 continued to free run, and 2 possibly entrained but displayed arrhythmicity during the experiment. In a second experiment, a photic pulse was used in a similar protocol. Five out of 9 squirrels entrained, 1 did not entrain, and 3 yielded ambiguous results. During stable entrainment, the phase-advancing nonphotic pulses coincided with the end of the subjective day, while phase-advancing light pulses coincided with the start of the subjective day: mean psi(nonphotic) = 11.4 h; mean psi(photic) = 0.9 h (psi defined as the difference between the onset of activity and the start of the pulse). The data for nonphotic entrainment correspond well with those from similar experiments with nocturnal Syrian hamsters where psi(nonphotic) varied from 8.09 to 11.34 h. This indicates that the circadian phase response to a nonphotic activity-inducing stimulus depends on the phase of the pacemaker rather than on the phase of the activity cycle.     

Late-night presentation of an auditory stimulus phase delays human circadian rhythms

Although light is considered the primary entrainer of circadian rhythms in humans, nonphotic stimuli, including exercise and melatonin also phase shift the biological clock. Furthermore, in birds and nonhuman mammals, auditory stimuli are effective zeitgebers. This study investigated whether a nonphotic auditory stimulus phase shifts human circadian rhythms. Ten subjects (5 men and 5 women, ages 18-72, mean age +/- SD, 44.7 +/- 21.4 yr) completed two 4-day laboratory sessions in constant dim light (<20 lux). They received two consecutive presentations of either a 2-h auditory or control stimulus from 0100 to 0300 on the second and third nights (presentation order of the stimulus and control was counterbalanced). Core body temperature (CBT) was collected and stored in 2-min bins throughout the study and salivary melatonin was obtained every 30 min from 1900 to 2330 on the baseline and poststimulus/postcontrol nights. Circadian phase of dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) and of CBT minimum, before and after auditory or control presentation was assessed. The auditory stimulus produced significantly larger phase delays of the circadian melatonin (mean +/- SD, -0.89 +/- 0.40 h vs. -0.27 +/- 0.16 h) and CBT (-1.16 +/- 0.69 h vs. -0.44 +/- 0.27 h) rhythms than the control. Phase changes for the two circadian rhythms also positively correlated, indicating direct effects on the biological clock. In addition, the auditory stimulus significantly decreased fatigue compared with the control. This study is the first demonstration of an auditory stimulus phase-shifting circadian rhythms in humans, with shifts similar in size and direction to those of other nonphotic stimuli presented during the early subjective night. This novel stimulus may be a useful countermeasure to facilitate circadian adaptation after transmeridian travel or shift work.     

Circadian periods of sensitivity for ramelteon on the onset of running-wheel activity and the peak of suprachiasmatic nucleus neuronal firing rhythms in C3H/HeN mice

Ramelteon, an MT(1)/MT(2) melatonin receptor agonist, is used for the treatment of sleep-onset insomnia and circadian sleep disorders. Ramelteon phase shifts circadian rhythms in rodents and humans when given at the end of the subjective day; however, its efficacy at other circadian times is not known. Here, the authors determined in C3H/HeN mice the maximal circadian sensitivity for ramelteon in vivo on the onset of circadian running-wheel activity rhythms, and in vitro on the peak of circadian rhythm of neuronal firing in suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) brain slices. The phase response curve (PRC) for ramelteon (90?μg/mouse, subcutaneous [sc]) on circadian wheel-activity rhythms shows maximal sensitivity during the late mid to end of the subjective day, between CT8 and CT12 (phase advance), and late subjective night and early subjective day, between CT20 and CT2 (phase delay), using a 3-day-pulse treatment regimen in C3H/HeN mice. The PRC for ramelteon resembles that for melatonin in C3H/HeN mice, showing the same magnitude of maximal shifts at CT10 and CT2, except that the range of sensitivity for ramelteon (CT8-CT12) during the subjective day is broader. Furthermore, in SCN brain slices in vitro, ramelteon (10 pM) administered at CT10 phase advances (5.6?±?0.29?h, n?=?3) and at CT2 phase delays (-3.2?±?0.12?h, n?=?6) the peak of circadian rhythm of neuronal firing, with the shifts being significantly larger than those induced by melatonin (10 pM) at the same circadian times (CT10: 2.7?±?0.15?h, n?=?4, p?相似文献   

Effects of light intensity and restraint on dark-pulse-induced circadian phase shifting during subjective night in Syrian hamsters

Dark pulses presented on a background of constant light (LL) result in phase advances during midsubjective day and early subjective night, and phase delays during late subjective night, as shown in the dark-pulse phase response curve. In hamsters, the phase-shifting effects of dark pulses are thought to be mediated by increased activity, as previous studies have shown that restraining animals during dark pulses blocks the phase shifts observed in midsubjective day and late subjective night. This study focuses on dark-pulse-induced phase shifting during early subjective night, examining the influence of both LL intensity and restraint on the magnitude of these phase shifts. Syrian hamsters were maintained in LL of four different illumination levels (1, 10, 100, or 600 lux) and periodically presented with 6-h pulses (dark pulse alone, restraint alone, or dark pulse plus restraint) beginning at circadian time 11. Phase advances were observed in response to dark pulses alone, and the magnitude of these shifts was dependent on background illumination, with significantly larger advances seen under higher intensities. No relationship was found between the amount of activity displayed during dark pulses and phase shift magnitude. Six-hour periods of restraint resulted in phase delays, the magnitude of which was also dependent on background illumination. Restraining hamsters during dark pulses reduced the magnitude of phase advances, but the extent of this reduction could be predicted from the additive effects of the dark-pulse-alone and restraint-alone conditions. These results indicate that the phase-shifting effects of dark pulses during early subjective night are not mediated by behavioral activation and may instead reflect a mirror image of the phase-delaying effects of light pulses at this phase.     

Photic phase response curve in Octodon degus: assessment as a function of activity phase preference

Light exposure during the early and late subjective night generally phase delays and advances circadian rhythms, respectively. However, this generality was recently questioned in a photic entrainment study in Octodon degus. Because degus can invert their activity phase preference from diurnal to nocturnal as a function of activity level, assessment of phase preference is critical for computations of phase reference [circadian time (CT) 0] toward the development of a photic phase response curve. After determining activity phase preference in a 24-h light-dark cycle (LD 12:12), degus were released in constant darkness. In this study, diurnal (n = 5) and nocturnal (n = 7) degus were randomly subjected to 1-h light pulses (30-35 lx) at many circadian phases (CT 1-6: n = 7; CT 7-12: n = 8; CT 13-18: n = 8; and CT 19-24: n = 7). The circadian phase of body temperature (Tb) onset was defined as CT 12 in nocturnal animals. In diurnal animals, CT 0 was determined as Tb onset + 1 h. Light phase delayed and advanced circadian rhythms when delivered during the early (CT 13-16) and late (CT 20-23) subjective night, respectively. No significant phase shifts were observed during the middle of the subjective day (CT 3-10). Thus, regardless of activity phase preference, photic entrainment of the circadian pacemaker in Octodon degus is similar to most other diurnal and nocturnal species, suggesting that entrainment mechanisms do not determine overt diurnal and nocturnal behavior.     

Signaling in the mammalian circadian clock: the NO/cGMP pathway

Mammalian circadian rhythms are generated by a hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) clock. Light pulses synchronize body rhythms by inducing phase delays during the early night and phase advances during the late night. Phosphorylation events are known to be involved in circadian phase shifting, both for delays and advances. Pharmacological inhibition of the cGMP-dependent kinase (cGK) or Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase (CaMK), or of neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) blocks the circadian responses to light in vivo. Light pulses administered during the subjective night, but not during the day, induce rapid phosphorylation of both p-CAMKII and p-nNOS (specifically phosphorylated by CaMKII). CaMKII inhibitors block light-induced nNOS activity and phosphorylation, suggesting a direct pathway between both enzymes. Furthermore, SCN cGMP exhibits diurnal and circadian rhythms with maximal values during the day or subjective day. This variation of cGMP levels appears to be related to temporal changes in phosphodiesterase (PDE) activity and not to guanylyl cyclase (GC) activity. Light pulses increase SCN cGMP levels at circadian time (CT) 18 (when light causes phase advances of rhythms) but not at CT 14 (the time for light-induced phase delays). cGK II is expressed in the hamster SCN and also exhibits circadian changes in its levels, peaking during the day. Light pulses increase cGK activity at CT 18 but not at CT 14. In addition, cGK and GC inhibition by KT-5823 and ODQ significantly attenuated light-induced phase shifts at CT 18. This inhibition did not change c-Fos expression SCN but affected the expression of the clock gene per in the SCN. These results suggest a signal transduction pathway responsible for light-induced phase advances of the circadian clock which could be summarized as follows: Glu-Ca2+-CaMKII-nNOS-GC-cGMP-cGK-->-->clock genes. This pathway offers a signaling window that allows peering into the circadian clock machinery in order to decipher its temporal cogs and wheels.     

THREE DAYS OF NOVEL WHEEL ACCESS DIMINISHES LIGHT-INDUCED PHASE DELAYS IN VIVO WITH NO EFFECT ON PER1 INDUCTION BY LIGHT

The mammalian circadian clock, located in the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nuclei, synchronizes endogenous behavioral and physiological rhythms to a 24h period through responses to two types of stimuli: photic (light) and nonphotic (behaviorally induced arousal and/or increases in activity). Photic stimuli can block nonphotic effects and vice versa, although the mechanisms and levels of interactions between these two stimuli types are unknown. Here, we investigated whether 3 d of access to a novel running wheel alters the phase shift to light in vivo, and whether this effect could be seen on induction by light of the circadian gene per1. Through measurement of running wheel activity of golden hamsters, access to a new wheel for 3 d was shown to diminish photic phase delays with no effect on phase advances. As seen using in situ hybridization, however, there was no effect on levels of light-induced per1 mRNA. This study indicates a possible role for this paradigm as a model of interactions between photic and nonphotic stimuli.     

Three days of novel wheel access diminishes light-induced phase delays in vivo with no effect on per1 induction by light

The mammalian circadian clock, located in the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nuclei, synchronizes endogenous behavioral and physiological rhythms to a 24 h period through responses to two types of stimuli: photic (light) and nonphotic (behaviorally induced arousal and/or increases in activity). Photic stimuli can block nonphotic effects and vice versa, although the mechanisms and levels of interactions between these two stimuli types are unknown. Here, we investigated whether 3 d of access to a novel running wheel alters the phase shift to light in vivo, and whether this effect could be seen on induction by light of the circadian gene per1. Through measurement of running wheel activity of golden hamsters, access to a new wheel for 3 d was shown to diminish photic phase delays with no effect on phase advances. As seen using in situ hybridization, however, there was no effect on levels of light-induced per1 mRNA. This study indicates a possible role for this paradigm as a model of interactions between photic and nonphotic stimuli.     

The effects of intraventricular carbachol injections on the free-running activity rhythm of the hamster

The effects of light on the circadian pacemaker in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) are mediated by the retinohypothalamic tract (RHT) and by the retinogeniculosuprachiasmatic tract (RGST). The neurotransmitter of the RGST is neuropeptide Y. The RHT may contain glutamate and aspartate. Recent evidence indicates that acetylcholine could also be involved in phase shifting by light. We determined that intraventricular injections with an acetylcholine agonist, carbachol, induces phase advances during the subjective day and phase delays during the early subjective night. No differences were observed between phase shifts induced in constant darkness and those induced in continuous light. A dose-response curve for carbachol was described at circadian time 6 (CT6). Injections at CT14 with various dosages of carbachol indicated the same dose dependency for this circadian time. Finally, carbachol injections in split animals resulted in similar responses of the two components of the split activity rhythm.     

An arousing, musically enhanced bird song stimulus mediates circadian rhythm phase advances in dim light

A musically enhanced bird song stimulus presented in the early subjective night phase delays human circadian rhythms. This study determined the phase-shifting effects of the same stimulus in the early subjective day. Eleven subjects (ages 18-63 yr; mean +/- SD: 28.0 +/- 16.6 yr) completed two 4-day laboratory sessions in constant dim light (<20 lux). They received two consecutive presentations of either a 2-h musically enhanced bird song or control stimulus from 0600 to 0800 on the second and third mornings while awake. The 4-day sessions employing either the stimulus or control were counterbalanced. Core body temperature (CBT) was collected throughout the study, and salivary melatonin was obtained every 30 min from 1900 to 2330 on the baseline and poststimulus/postcontrol nights. Dim light melatonin onset and CBT minimum circadian phase before and after stimulus or control presentation was assessed. The musically enhanced bird song stimulus produced significantly larger phase advances of the circadian melatonin (mean +/- SD: 0.87 +/- 0.36 vs. 0.24 +/- 0.22 h) and CBT (1.08 +/- 0.50 vs. 0.43 +/- 0.37 h) rhythms than the control. The stimulus also decreased fatigue and total mood disturbance, suggesting arousing effects. This study shows that a musically enhanced bird song stimulus presented during the early subjective day phase advances circadian rhythms. However, it remains unclear whether the phase shifts are due directly to effects of the stimulus on the clock or are arousal- or dim light-mediated effects. This nonphotic stimulus mediates circadian resynchronization in either the phase advance or delay direction.