Cellulose synthase gene expression profiling of Physcomitrella patens

The cellulose synthase (CESA) gene family of seed plants comprises six clades that encode isoforms with conserved expression patterns and distinct functions in cellulose synthesis complex (CSC) formation and primary and secondary cell wall synthesis. In mosses, which have rosette CSCs like those of seed plants but lack lignified secondary cell walls, the CESA gene family diversified independently and includes no members of the six functionally distinct seed plant clades. There are seven CESA isoforms encoded in the genome of the moss Physcomitrella patens. However, only PpCESA5 has been characterised functionally, and little information is available on the expression of other PpCESA family members. We have profiled PpCESA expression through quantitative RT‐PCR, analysis of promoter‐reporter lines, and cluster analysis of public microarray data in an effort to identify expression and co‐expression patterns that could help reveal the functions of PpCESA isoforms in protein complex formation and development of specific tissues. In contrast to the tissue‐specific expression observed for seed plant CESAs, each of the PpCESAs was broadly expressed throughout most developing tissues. Although a few statistically significant differences in expression of PpCESAs were noted when some tissues and hormone treatments were compared, no strong co‐expression patterns were observed. Along with CESA phylogenies and lack of single PpCESA mutant phenotypes reported elsewhere, broad overlapping expression of the PpCESAs indicates a high degree of inter‐changeability and is consistent with a different pattern of functional specialisation in the evolution of the seed plant and moss CESA families.     

The N‐terminal zinc finger of CELLULOSE SYNTHASE6 is critical in defining its functional properties by determining the level of homodimerization in Arabidopsis

Primary cell wall cellulose is synthesized by the cellulose synthase complex (CSC) containing CELLULOSE SYNTHASE1 (CESA1), CESA3 and one of four CESA6‐like proteins in Arabidopsis. It has been proposed that the CESA6‐like proteins occupy the same position in the CSC, but their underlying selection mechanism remains unclear. We produced a chimeric CESA5 by replacing its N‐terminal zinc finger with its CESA6 counterpart to investigate the consequences for its homodimerization, a crucial step in forming higher‐order structures during assembly of the CSC. We found that the mutant phenotypes of prc1‐1, a cesa6 null mutant, were rescued by the chimeric CESA5, and became comparable to the wild type (WT) and prc1‐1 complemented by WT CESA6 in regard to plant growth, cellulose content, cellulose microfibril organization, CSC dynamics and subcellular localization. Bimolecular fluorescence complementation assays were employed to evaluate pairwise interactions between the N‐terminal regions of CESA1, CESA3, CESA5, CESA6 and the chimeric CESA5. We verified that the chimeric CESA5 explicitly interacted with all the other CESA partners, comparable to CESA6, whereas interaction between CESA5 with itself was significantly weaker than that of all other CESA pairs. Our findings suggest that the homodimerization of CESA6 through its N‐terminal zinc finger is critical in defining its functional properties, and possibly determines its intrinsic roles in facilitating higher‐order structures in CSCs.     

Manipulating cellulose biosynthesis by expression of mutant Arabidopsis proM24::CESA3ixr1‐2 gene in transgenic tobacco

Manipulation of the cellulose biosynthetic machinery in plants has the potential to provide insight into plant growth, morphogenesis and to create modified cellulose for anthropogenic use. Evidence exists that cellulose microfibril structure and its recalcitrance to enzymatic digestion can ameliorated via mis‐sense mutation in the primary cell wall–specific gene AtCELLULOSE SYNTHASE (CESA)3. This mis‐sense mutation has been identified based on conferring drug resistance to the cellulose inhibitory herbicide isoxaben. To examine whether it would be possible to introduce mutant CESA alleles via a transgenic approach, we overexpressed a modified version of CESA3, AtCESA3^ixr1‐2 derived from Arabidopsis thaliana L. Heynh into a different plant family, the Solanceae dicotyledon tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L. variety Samsun NN). Specifically, a chimeric gene construct of CESA3^ixr1‐2, codon optimized for tobacco, was placed between the heterologous M24 promoter and the rbcSE9 gene terminator. The results demonstrated that the tobacco plants expressing M24‐CESA3^ixr1‐2 displayed isoxaben resistance, consistent with functionality of the mutated AtCESA3^ixr1‐2 in tobacco. Secondly, during enzymatic saccharification, transgenic leaf‐ and stem‐derived cellulose is 54%–66% and 40%–51% more efficient, respectively, compared to the wild type, illustrating translational potential of modified CESA loci. Moreover, the introduction of M24‐AtCESA3^ixr1‐2 caused aberrant spatial distribution of lignified secondary cell wall tissue and a reduction in the zone occupied by parenchyma cells.     

Functional analysis of complexes with mixed primary and secondary cellulose synthases

In higher plants, cellulose is synthesized by cellulose synthase complexes, which contain multiple isoforms of cellulose synthases (CESAs). Among the total 10 CESA genes in Arabidopsis, recessive mutations at three of them cause the collapse of mature xylem cells in inflorescence stems of Arabidopsis (irx1^cesa8, irx3^cesa7 and irx5^cesa4). These CESA genes are considered secondary cell wall CESAs. The others (the function CESA10 is still unknown) are thought to be specialized for cellulose synthesis in the primary cell wall. A split-ubiquitin membrane yeast two-hybrid system was used to assess interactions among four primary CESAs (CESA1, CESA2, CESA3, CESA6) and three secondary CESAs (CESA4, CESA7, CESA8). Our results showed that primary CESAs could physically interact with secondary CESAs in a limited fashion. Analysis of transgenic lines showed that CESA1 could partially rescue irx1^cesa8 null mutants, resulting in complementation of the plant growth defect, collapsed xylem and cellulose content deficiency. These results suggest that mixed primary and secondary CESA complexes are functional using experimental set-ups.     

A CELLULOSE SYNTHASE (CESA) gene essential for gametophore morphogenesis in the moss Physcomitrella patens

In seed plants, different groups of orthologous genes encode the CELLULOSE SYNTHASE (CESA) proteins that are responsible for cellulose biosynthesis in primary and secondary cell walls. The seven CESA sequences of the moss Physcomitrella patens (Hedw.) B. S. G. form a monophyletic sister group to seed plant CESAs, consistent with independent CESA diversification and specialization in moss and seed plant lines. The role of PpCESA5 in the development of P. patens was investigated by targeted mutagenesis. The cesa5 knockout lines were tested for cellulose deficiency using carbohydrate-binding module affinity cytochemistry and the morphology of the leafy gametophores was analyzed by 3D reconstruction of confocal images. No defects were identified in the development of the filamentous protonema or in production of bud initials that normally give rise to the leafy gametophores. However, the gametophore buds were cellulose deficient and defects in subsequent cell expansion, cytokinesis, and leaf initiation resulted in the formation of irregular cell clumps instead of leafy shoots. Analysis of the cesa5 knockout phenotype indicates that a biophysical model of organogenesis can be extended to the moss gametophore shoot apical meristem.     

The Arabidopsis Cellulose Synthase Complex: A Proposed Hexamer of CESA Trimers in an Equimolar Stoichiometry

Cellulose is the most abundant renewable polymer on Earth and a major component of the plant cell wall. In vascular plants, cellulose synthesis is catalyzed by a large, plasma membrane-localized cellulose synthase complex (CSC), visualized as a hexameric rosette structure. Three unique cellulose synthase (CESA) isoforms are required for CSC assembly and function. However, elucidation of either the number or stoichiometry of CESAs within the CSC has remained elusive. In this study, we show a 1:1:1 stoichiometry between the three Arabidopsis thaliana secondary cell wall isozymes: CESA4, CESA7, and CESA8. This ratio was determined utilizing a simple but elegant method of quantitative immunoblotting using isoform-specific antibodies and ³⁵S-labeled protein standards for each CESA. Additionally, the observed equimolar stoichiometry was found to be fixed along the axis of the stem, which represents a developmental gradient. Our results complement recent spectroscopic analyses pointing toward an 18-chain cellulose microfibril. Taken together, we propose that the CSC is composed of a hexamer of catalytically active CESA trimers, with each CESA in equimolar amounts. This finding is a crucial advance in understanding how CESAs integrate to form higher order complexes, which is a key determinate of cellulose microfibril and cell wall properties.     

Cellulose synthase interactive protein 1 (CSI1) mediates the intimate relationship between cellulose microfibrils and cortical microtubules

Cellulose is synthesized at the plasma membrane by protein complexes known as cellulose synthase complexes (CSCs). The cellulose-microtubule alignment hypothesis states that there is a causal link between the orientation of cortical microtubules and orientation of nascent cellulose microfibrils. The mechanism behind the alignment hypothesis is largely unknown. CESA interactive protein 1 (CSI1) interacts with CSCs and potentially links CSCs to the cytoskeleton. CSI1 not only co-localizes with CSCs but also travels bi-directionally in a speed indistinguishable from CSCs. The linear trajectories of CSI1-RFP coincide with the underlying microtubules labeled by YFP-TUA5. In the absence of CSI1, both the distribution and the motility of CSCs are defective and the alignment of CSCs and microtubules is disrupted. These observations led to the hypothesis that CSI1 directly mediates the interaction between CSCs and microtubules. In support of this hypothesis, CSI1 binds to microtubules directly by an in vitro microtubule-binding assay. In addition to a role in serving as a messenger from microtubule to CSCs, CSI1 labels SmaCCs/MASCs, a compartment that has been proposed to be involved in CESA trafficking and/or delivery to the plasma membrane.     

KORRIGAN1 Interacts Specifically with Integral Components of the Cellulose Synthase Machinery

Cellulose is synthesized by the so called rosette protein complex and the catalytic subunits of this complex are the cellulose synthases (CESAs). It is thought that the rosette complexes in the primary and secondary cell walls each contains at least three different non-redundant cellulose synthases. In addition to the CESA proteins, cellulose biosynthesis almost certainly requires the action of other proteins, although few have been identified and little is known about the biochemical role of those that have been identified. One of these proteins is KORRIGAN (KOR1). Mutant analysis of this protein in Arabidopsis thaliana showed altered cellulose content in both the primary and secondary cell wall. KOR1 is thought to be required for cellulose synthesis acting as a cellulase at the plasma membrane–cell wall interface. KOR1 has recently been shown to interact with the primary cellulose synthase rosette complex however direct interaction with that of the secondary cell wall has never been demonstrated. Using various methods, both in vitro and in planta, it was shown that KOR1 interacts specifically with only two of the secondary CESA proteins. The KOR1 protein domain(s) involved in the interaction with the CESA proteins were also identified by analyzing the interaction of truncated forms of KOR1 with CESA proteins. The KOR1 transmembrane domain has shown to be required for the interaction between KOR1 and the different CESAs, as well as for higher oligomer formation of KOR1.     

A CELLULOSE SYNTHASE (CESA) GENE FROM THE RED ALGA PORPHYRA YEZOENSIS (RHODOPHYTA)1

The cell walls of Porphyra species, like those of land plants, contain cellulose microfibrils that are synthesized by clusters of cellulose synthase enzymes (“terminal complexes”), which move in the plasma membrane. However, the morphologies of the Porphyra terminal complexes and the cellulose microfibrils they produce differ from those of land plants. To characterize the genetic basis for these differences, we have identified, cloned, and sequenced a cellulose synthase (CESA) gene from Porphyra yezoensis Ueda strain TU‐1. A partial cDNA sequence was identified in the P. yezoensis expressed sequence tag (EST) index using a land plant CESA sequence as a query. High‐efficiency thermal asymmetric interlaced PCR was used to amplify sequences upstream of the cDNA sequence from P. yezoensis genomic DNA. Using the resulting genomic sequences as queries, we identified additional EST sequences and a full‐length cDNA clone, which we named PyCESA1. The conceptual translation of PyCESA1 includes the four catalytic domains and the N‐ and C‐terminal transmembrane domains that characterize CESA proteins. Genomic PCR demonstrated that PyCESA1 contains no introns. Southern blot analysis indicated that P. yezoensis has at least three genomic sequences with high similarity to the cloned gene; two of these are pseudogenes based on analysis of amplified genomic sequences. The P. yezoensis CESA peptide sequence is most similar to cellulose synthase sequences from the oomycete Phytophthora infestans and from cyanobacteria. Comparing the CESA genes of P. yezoensis and land plants may facilitate identification of sequences that control terminal complex and cellulose microfibril morphology.     

OsCESA9 conserved‐site mutation leads to largely enhanced plant lodging resistance and biomass enzymatic saccharification by reducing cellulose DP and crystallinity in rice

Genetic modification of plant cell walls has been posed to reduce lignocellulose recalcitrance for enhancing biomass saccharification. Since cellulose synthase (CESA) gene was first identified, several dozen CESA mutants have been reported, but almost all mutants exhibit the defective phenotypes in plant growth and development. In this study, the rice (Oryza sativa) Osfc16 mutant with substitutions (W481C, P482S) at P‐CR conserved site in CESA9 shows a slightly affected plant growth and higher biomass yield by 25%–41% compared with wild type (Nipponbare, a japonica variety). Chemical and ultrastructural analyses indicate that Osfc16 has a significantly reduced cellulose crystallinity (CrI) and thinner secondary cell walls compared with wild type. CESA co‐IP detection, together with implementations of a proteasome inhibitor (MG132) and two distinct cellulose inhibitors (Calcofluor, CGA), shows that CESA9 mutation could affect integrity of CESA4/7/9 complexes, which may lead to rapid CESA proteasome degradation for low‐DP cellulose biosynthesis. These may reduce cellulose CrI, which improves plant lodging resistance, a major and integrated agronomic trait on plant growth and grain production, and enhances biomass enzymatic saccharification by up to 2.3‐fold and ethanol productivity by 34%–42%. This study has for the first time reported a direct modification for the low‐DP cellulose production that has broad applications in biomass industries.     

Genetic modification in cellulose‐synthase reduces crystallinity and improves biochemical conversion to fermentable sugar

The cellulose synthase (CESA) membrane complex synthesizes microfibrils of cellulose that surround all plant cells. Cellulose is made of sugar (β,1‐4 glucan) and accessing the sugar in cellulose for biofuels is of critical importance to stem the use of fossil fuels and avoid competition with food crops and pristine lands associated with starch‐based biofuel production. The recalcitrance of cellulose to enzymatic conversion to a fermentable form of sugar is related to the degree of hydrogen bonding or crystallization of the glucan chain. Herein, we isolate the first viable low biomass‐crystallinity mutant by screening for altered cell wall structure using X‐ray scattering as well as screening for enzymatic conversion efficiency on a range of cell wall mutants in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Through detailed analysis of the kinetics of bioconversion we identified a mutant that met both selection criteria. This mutant is ixr1‐2, which contains a mutation in a highly conserved consensus sequence among the C‐terminal transmembrane regions within CESA3. A 34% lower biomass crystallization index and 151% improvement in the efficiency of conversion from raw biomass to fermentable sugars was measured relative to that of wild type (Col‐0). Recognizing the inherent ambiguities with an insoluble complex substrate like cellulose and how little is still understood regarding the regulation of CESA we propose a general model for how to manipulate CESA enzymes to improve the recalcitrance of cellulose to enzymatic hydrolysis. This study also raises intriguing possibilities as to the functional importance of transmembrane anchoring in CESA complex and microfibril formation.     

A Structural Study of CESA1 Catalytic Domain of Arabidopsis Cellulose Synthesis Complex: Evidence for CESA Trimers

A cellulose synthesis complex with a “rosette” shape is responsible for synthesis of cellulose chains and their assembly into microfibrils within the cell walls of land plants and their charophyte algal progenitors. The number of cellulose synthase proteins in this large multisubunit transmembrane protein complex and the number of cellulose chains in a microfibril have been debated for many years. This work reports a low resolution structure of the catalytic domain of CESA1 from Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana; AtCESA1CatD) determined by small-angle scattering techniques and provides the first experimental evidence for the self-assembly of CESA into a stable trimer in solution. The catalytic domain was overexpressed in Escherichia coli, and using a two-step procedure, it was possible to isolate monomeric and trimeric forms of AtCESA1CatD. The conformation of monomeric and trimeric AtCESA1CatD proteins were studied using small-angle neutron scattering and small-angle x-ray scattering. A series of AtCESA1CatD trimer computational models were compared with the small-angle x-ray scattering trimer profile to explore the possible arrangement of the monomers in the trimers. Several candidate trimers were identified with monomers oriented such that the newly synthesized cellulose chains project toward the cell membrane. In these models, the class-specific region is found at the periphery of the complex, and the plant-conserved region forms the base of the trimer. This study strongly supports the “hexamer of trimers” model for the rosette cellulose synthesis complex that synthesizes an 18-chain cellulose microfibril as its fundamental product.Cellulose, the most abundant biopolymer on Earth, is composed of linear chains of β-1,4 linked d-Glc monomers with repeating structural units of the disaccharide cellobiose. Numerous cellulose polymers cocrystallize to form microfibrils, which provide mechanical strength and rigidity to plants. Its natural abundance makes it an attractive target for many industrial applications, including paper and pulping, construction, and textile manufacture. More recently, cellulose has been used for production of biofuels, such as ethanol (Ragauskas et al., 2006; Langan et al., 2014), and in the form of nanocellulose as a component in advanced composite materials (Reddy et al., 2013; Habibi, 2014). Cellulose microfibrils are synthesized by a large membrane-bound protein complex. In the land plants and charophycean algae, the cellulose synthesis complex (CSC) has a “rosette” shape (Mueller et al., 1976; Mueller and Brown, 1980b; Kimura et al., 1999), and the entire CSC has reported diameters between 24 to 30 nm (Lerouxel et al., 2006). This structural information was revealed by freeze-fracture transmission electron microscopy, showing six lobes in a hexagonal arrangement at the point where the transmembrane helices of multiple cellulose synthase proteins (CESAs) cross the plasma membrane. Recently KORRIGAN, a protein with cellulase activity, has also been implicated as an integral component of the CSC (Vain et al., 2014).Vascular plants produce several different CESA isoforms. For example, Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) has 10 different isoforms with 64% to 98% sequence identity (Holland et al., 2000; Richmond, 2000; McFarlane et al., 2014). The different CESA isoforms play specific roles in cellulose synthesis during plant development. In Arabidopsis, CESA1, CESA3, and CESA6 are required for primary cell wall synthesis, while CESA4, CESA7, and CESA8 are required for secondary cell wall synthesis (Gardiner et al., 2003; Taylor et al., 2003; Persson et al., 2007). CESA2, CESA5, and CESA9 play roles in tissue-specific processes and are partially redundant with CESA6, whereas CESA10 is closely related to AtCESA1 but evidently has a minor role in plant development (Somerville, 2006). The absolute number of CESA proteins present in a CSC remains a subject of much speculation, largely because the stoichiometry of the cellulose microfibril remains unresolved (Cosgrove, 2014). The traditional representation of the microfibril has 36 cellulose chains, and based on this, one would expect that each lobe of the rosette CSC contains six CESA proteins responsible for the synthesis of six glucan chains for a total of 36 CESA proteins per rosette CSC (Herth, 1983; Perrin, 2001; Doblin et al., 2002). However, recent studies using different analytical techniques combined with computation report 18 to 24 cellulose chains per microfibril (Fernandes et al., 2011; Thomas et al., 2013; Oehme et al., 2015). A study of cellulose from mung bean (Vigna radiata) primary cell walls, using x-ray diffraction, solid-state NMR, and computational analysis, supports an 18-chain model for a cellulose microfibril (Newman et al., 2013). This implies that the CSC is composed of fewer than 36 CESA proteins or that not all of the proteins in a CSC are simultaneously active. Further, it has been recently reported that the stoichiometry of CESAs 1, 3, and 6 and CESAs 4, 7, and 8 in the primary and secondary cell walls, respectively, is 1:1:1 (Gonneau et al., 2014; Hill et al., 2014). Together, these reports suggest a rosette CSC composed of 18 CESA proteins with three CESAs per lobe as the most likely composition of a rosette CSC to account for an 18-chain cellulose microfibril (Newman et al., 2013; Gonneau et al., 2014; Hill et al., 2014). In addition, it should also be noted that 24 CESA proteins in a rosette CSC with four proteins per lobe is incompatible with a 1:1:1 CESA stoichiometry.Numerous efforts to isolate active CESA proteins directly from plants or by recombinant expression have not been successful, preventing a detailed structural analysis of CESA proteins or the mechanism of plant cellulose synthesis. In contrast, the recently reported crystal structure of cellulose synthase from Rhodoobacter sphaeroides (Morgan et al., 2013) clearly showed that only a single cellulose synthase polypeptide is required for glucan polymerization and also identified the conserved sequence motifs responsible for catalysis. In addition, based on the presence of an 18-residue glucan chain in the protein tunnel, a mechanism for cellulose synthesis and translocation across a cytoplasmic membrane was proposed that also addressed how the alternate d-Glc molecules are inverted during polymer synthesis (Morgan et al., 2013; Omadjela et al., 2013). However, this structure cannot provide insight into the formation of microfibrils from the cellulose chains synthesized by single polypeptides of CESA.The CESA proteins of land plants and their charophycean algal relatives are multidomain single polypeptide chains of approximately 1000 amino acids. They are predicted to have eight transmembrane helices and to have their N- and C-terminal regions facing the cytoplasm (Pear et al., 1996). Although they share sequence similarity with the bacterial counterpart, they also have unique structural features not found in the bacterial enzymes. The N-terminal domain contains a Zn-binding site that may play a role in oligomerization of CESA proteins (Kurek et al., 2002). The putative cytosolic domain, which is flanked by a two-helix N-terminal transmembrane domain and a six-helix C-terminal transmembrane domain (McFarlane et al., 2014; Slabaugh et al., 2014), has D, D, D, QxxRW motifs that are conserved substrate binding and catalytic residues in the glycosyltransferase-2 superfamily (Nagahashi et al., 1995; Pear et al., 1996; Saxena and Brown, 1997; Yoshida et al., 2000). This domain also has a plant-conserved region (P-CR) and a class-specific region (CSR) that are only found in CESAs that form rosette CSCs. Although the roles of these regions are unknown, they are proposed to be involved in regulatory functions, such as interactions with other proteins and oligomerization to form the rosette shape. In the Arabidopsis CESAs, the sequence identity within the P-CR regions is greater than 80%, while in CSR regions, it is only about 40%. A recent computational model of the cytosolic domain of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) CESA1 provides the first detailed structural model of the catalytic domain of CESA (Sethaphong et al., 2013). This model structure aligns well with the crystal structure of the bacterial cellulose synthase, indicating that a common mechanism exists for cellulose synthesis in bacteria and plants and that CESAs within rosette CSCs contain a single active synthetic site. In addition, this model made it possible to test possible configurations for the assembly of CESA monomers into a functional rosette CSC (Newman et al., 2013; Sethaphong et al., 2013).Our understanding of the mechanism of cellulose biosynthesis in plants at the molecular level is hampered by the lack of an atomic level CESA model. To gain deeper insight into the structure and role of the catalytic domain of CESA in rosette formation, we carried out a structural characterization of the cytosolic domain of Arabidopsis CESA1, a protein that is essential for cellulose synthesis in the primary cell wall (Arioli et al., 1998). The recombinant protein was purified from Escherichia coli in a two-step process that allowed us to obtain low-resolution structural information about the monomeric and trimeric forms of the recombinant protein using small-angle scattering (SAS) techniques. This study provides the first experimental evidence to support the self-assembly of CESAs into a stable trimer complex, revealing the possible role of the catalytic domain in the formation of the rosette CSC. Comparison of the size of the catalytic domain trimer with dimensions of rosette CSCs obtained from TEM studies strongly supports the “hexamer of trimers” model for rosette CSCs. Computational analysis of the scattering data suggested configurations for how the monomers, including the plant-specific P-CR and CSR domains, may be arranged in the trimeric lobes of the rosette CSC. Knowledge of how CESA proteins assemble in the CSC will enable approaches for rational genetic manipulation of plant cell wall synthesis, which offers enormous opportunities to improve feedstocks for the production of sustainable fuels and chemicals.     

Hetero‐trans‐β‐glucanase,an enzyme unique to Equisetum plants,functionalizes cellulose

Cell walls are metabolically active components of plant cells. They contain diverse enzymes, including transglycanases (endotransglycosylases), enzymes that ‘cut and paste’ certain structural polysaccharide molecules and thus potentially remodel the wall during growth and development. Known transglycanase activities modify several cell‐wall polysaccharides (xyloglucan, mannans, mixed‐linkage β‐glucan and xylans); however, no transglycanases were known to act on cellulose, the principal polysaccharide of biomass. We now report the discovery and characterization of hetero‐trans‐β‐glucanase (HTG), a transglycanase that targets cellulose, in horsetails (Equisetum spp., an early‐diverging genus of monilophytes). HTG is also remarkable in predominantly catalysing hetero‐transglycosylation: its preferred donor substrates (cellulose or mixed‐linkage β‐glucan) differ qualitatively from its acceptor substrate (xyloglucan). HTG thus generates stable cellulose–xyloglucan and mixed‐linkage β‐glucan–xyloglucan covalent bonds, and may therefore strengthen ageing Equisetum tissues by inter‐linking different structural polysaccharides of the cell wall. 3D modelling suggests that only three key amino acid substitutions (Trp → Pro, Gly → Ser and Arg → Leu) are responsible for the evolution of HTG's unique specificity from the better‐known xyloglucan‐acting homo‐transglycanases (xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolases; XTH). Among land plants, HTG appears to be confined to Equisetum, but its target polysaccharides are widespread, potentially offering opportunities for enhancing crop mechanical properties, such as wind resistance. In addition, by linking cellulose to xyloglucan fragments previously tagged with compounds such as dyes or indicators, HTG may be useful biotechnologically for manufacturing stably functionalized celluloses, thereby potentially offering a commercially valuable ‘green’ technology for industrially manipulating biomass.     

An integrative analysis of four CESA isoforms specific for fiber cellulose production between Gossypium hirsutum and Gossypium barbadense

Cotton fiber is an excellent model system of cellulose biosynthesis; however, it has not been widely studied due to the lack of information about the cellulose synthase (CESA) family of genes in cotton. In this study, we initially identified six full-length CESA genes designated as GhCESA5–GhCESA10. Phylogenetic analysis and gene co-expression profiling revealed that CESA1, CESA2, CESA7, and CESA8 were the major isoforms for secondary cell wall biosynthesis, whereas CESA3, CESA5, CESA6, CESA9, and CESA10 should involve in primary cell wall formation for cotton fiber initiation and elongation. Using integrative analysis of gene expression patterns, CESA protein levels, and cellulose biosynthesis in vivo, we detected that CESA8 could play an enhancing role for rapid and massive cellulose accumulation in Gossypium hirsutum and Gossypium barbadense. We found that CESA2 displayed a major expression in non-fiber tissues and that CESA1, a housekeeping gene like, was predominantly expressed in all tissues. Further, a dynamic alteration was observed in cell wall composition and a significant discrepancy was observed between the cotton species during fiber elongation, suggesting that pectin accumulation and xyloglucan reduction might contribute to cell wall transition. In addition, we discussed that callose synthesis might be regulated in vivo for massive cellulose production during active secondary cell wall biosynthesis in cotton fibers.     

Phytochrome regulation of cellulose synthesis in Arabidopsis

Plant development is highly plastic and dependent on light quantity and quality monitored by specific photoreceptors. Although we have a detailed knowledge of light signaling pathways, little is known about downstream targets involved in growth control. Cell size and shape are in part controlled by cellulose microfibrils extruded from large cellulose synthase complexes (CSCs) that migrate in the plasma membrane along cortical microtubules. Here we show a role for the red/far-red light photoreceptor PHYTOCHROME B (PHYB) in the regulation of cellulose synthesis in the growing Arabidopsis hypocotyl. In this organ, CSCs contains three distinct cellulose synthase (CESA) isoform classes: nonredundant CESA1 and CESA3 and a third class represented by partially redundant CESA2, CESA5, and CESA6. Interestingly, in the dark, depending on which CESA subunits occupy the third position, CSC velocity is more or less inhibited through an interaction with microtubules. Activation of PHYB overrules this inhibition. The analysis of cesa5 mutants shows a role for phosphorylation in the control of CSC velocity. These results, combined with the cesa5 mutant phenotype, suggest that cellulose synthesis is fine tuned through the regulated interaction of CSCs with microtubules and that PHYB signaling impinges on this process to maintain cell wall strength and growth in changing environments.     

Cellulose synthesis in two secondary cell wall processes in a single cell type

Plant cells have a rigid cell wall that constrains internal turgor pressure yet extends in a regulated and organized manner to allow the cell to acquire shape. The primary load-bearing macromolecule of a plant cell wall is cellulose, which forms crystalline microfibrils that are organized with respect to a cell''s function and shape requirements. A primary cell wall is deposited during expansion whereas secondary cell wall is synthesized post expansion during differentiation. A complex form of asymmetrical cellular differentiation occurs in Arabidopsis seed coat epidermal cells, where we have recently shown that two secondary cell wall processes occur that utilize different cellulose synthase (CESA) proteins. One process is to produce pectinaceous mucilage that expands upon hydration and the other is a radial wall thickening that reinforced the epidermal cell structure. Our data illustrate polarized specialization of CESA5 in facilitating mucilage attachment to the parent seed and CESA2, CESA5 and CESA9 in radial cell wall thickening and formation of the columella. Herein, we present a model for the complexity of cellulose biosynthesis in this highly differentiated cell type with further evidence supporting each cellulosic secondary cell wall process.     

Three AtCesA6‐like members enhance biomass production by distinctively promoting cell growth in Arabidopsis

Cellulose is an abundant biopolymer and a prominent constituent of plant cell walls. Cellulose is also a central component to plant morphogenesis and contributes the bulk of a plant's biomass. While cellulose synthase (CesA) genes were identified over two decades ago, genetic manipulation of this family to enhance cellulose production has remained difficult. In this study, we show that increasing the expression levels of the three primary cell wall AtCesA6‐like genes (AtCesA2, AtCesA5, AtCesA6), but not AtCesA3, AtCesA9 or secondary cell wall AtCesA7, can promote the expression of major primary wall CesA genes to accelerate primary wall CesA complex (cellulose synthase complexes, CSCs) particle movement for acquiring long microfibrils and consequently increasing cellulose production in Arabidopsis transgenic lines, as compared with wild‐type. The overexpression transgenic lines displayed changes in expression of genes related to cell growth and proliferation, perhaps explaining the enhanced growth of the transgenic seedlings. Notably, overexpression of the three AtCesA6‐like genes also enhanced secondary cell wall deposition that led to improved mechanical strength and higher biomass production in transgenic mature plants. Hence, we propose that overexpression of certain AtCesA genes can provide a biotechnological approach to increase cellulose synthesis and biomass accumulation in transgenic plants.     

Interactions between membrane-bound cellulose synthases involved in the synthesis of the secondary cell wall

It has not yet been reported how the secondary CESA (cellulose synthase) proteins are organized in the rosette structure. A membrane-based yeast two-hybrid (MbYTH) approach was used to analyze the interactions between the CESA proteins involved in secondary cell wall synthesis of Arabidopsis and the findings were confirmed in planta by bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) assay. Results indicated that although all CESA proteins can interact with each other, only CESA4 is able to form homodimers. A model is proposed for the secondary rosette structure. The RING-motif proved not to be essential for the interaction between the CESA proteins.

Structured summary

MINT-6951243: PIP2-1 (uniprotkb:P43286) physically interacts (MI:0218) with PIP2-1 (uniprotkb:P43286) by bimolecular fluorescence complementation (MI:0809)MINT-6950816: CESA4 (uniprotkb:Q84JA6) physically interacts (MI:0218) withCESA4 (uniprotkb:Q84JA6) by membrane bound complementation assay (MI:0230)MINT-6951056, MINT-6951071, MINT-6951088, MINT-6951103: CESA7 (uniprotkb:Q9SWW6) physically interacts (MI:0218) with CESA4 (uniprotkb:Q84JA6) by bimolecular fluorescence complementation (MI:0809)MINT-6950949, MINT-6950990: CESA4 (uniprotkb:Q84JA6) physically interacts (MI:0218) with CESA8 (uniprotkb:Q8LPK5) by membrane bound complementation assay (MI:0230)MINT-6950909, MINT-6951030: CESA4 (uniprotkb:Q8LPK5) physically interacts (MI:0218) with CESA7 (uniprotkb:Q9SWW6) by membrane bound complementation assay (MI:0230)MINT-6951042: CESA4 (uniprotkb:Q84JA6) physically interacts (MI:0218) with CESA4 (uniprotkb:Q84JA6) by bimolecular fluorescence complementation (MI:0809)MINT-6951004, MINT-6951016: CESA8 (uniprotkb:Q8LPK5) physically interacts (MI:0218) with CESA7 (uniprotkb:Q9SWW6) by membrane bound complementation assay (MI:0230)MINT-6951217, MINT-6951230: CESA4 (uniprotkb:Q84JA6) physically interacts (MI:0218) with CESA8 (uniprotkb:Q8LPK5) by bimolecular fluorescence complementation (MI:0809)MINT-6951120, MINT-6951140, MINT-6951156, MINT-6951170, MINT-6951185: CESA8 (uniprotkb:Q8LPK5) physically interacts (MI:0218) withCESA7 (uniprotkb:Q9SWW6) by bimolecular fluorescence complementation (MI:0809)MINT-6951199: CESA8 (uniprotkb:Q8LPK5) physically interacts (MI:0218) withCESA8 (uniprotkb:Q8LPK5) by bimolecular fluorescence complementation (MI:0809)