The RES domain toxins of RES‐Xre toxin‐antitoxin modules induce cell stasis by degrading NAD+

Type II toxin‐antitoxin (TA) modules, which are important cellular regulators in prokaryotes, usually encode two proteins, a toxin that inhibits cell growth and a nontoxic and labile inhibitor (antitoxin) that binds to and neutralizes the toxin. Here, we demonstrate that the res‐xre locus from Photorhabdus luminescens and other bacterial species function as bona fide TA modules in Escherichia coli. The 2.2 Å crystal structure of the intact Pseudomonas putida RES‐Xre TA complex reveals an unusual 2:4 stoichiometry in which a central RES toxin dimer binds two Xre antitoxin dimers. The antitoxin dimers each expose two helix‐turn‐helix DNA‐binding domains of the Cro repressor type, suggesting the TA complex is capable of binding the upstream promoter sequence on DNA. The toxin core domain shows structural similarity to ADP‐ribosylating enzymes such as diphtheria toxin but has an atypical NAD⁺‐binding pocket suggesting an alternative function. We show that activation of the toxin in vivo causes a depletion of intracellular NAD⁺ levels eventually leading to inhibition of cell growth in E. coli and inhibition of global macromolecular biosynthesis. Both structure and activity are unprecedented among bacterial TA systems, suggesting the functional scope of bacterial TA toxins is much wider than previously appreciated.     

Structure–function studies of Escherichia coli RnlA reveal a novel toxin structure involved in bacteriophage resistance

Escherichia coli RnlA–RnlB is a newly identified toxin–antitoxin (TA) system that plays a role in bacteriophage resistance. RnlA functions as a toxin with mRNA endoribonuclease activity and the cognate antitoxin RnlB inhibits RnlA toxicity in E. coli cells. Interestingly, T4 phage encodes the antitoxin Dmd, which acts against RnlA to promote its own propagation, suggesting that RnlA‐Dmd represents a novel TA system. Here, we have determined the crystal structure of RnlA refined to 2.10 Å. RnlA is composed of three independent domains: NTD (N ‐t erminal d omain), NRD (N r epeated d omain) and DBD (D md‐b inding d omain), which is an organization not previously observed among known toxin structures. Small‐angle X‐ray scattering (SAXS) analysis revealed that RnlA forms a dimer in solution via interactions between the DBDs from both monomers. The in vitro and in vivo functional studies showed that among the three domains, only the DBD is responsible for recognition and inhibition by Dmd and subcellular location of RnlA. In particular, the helix located at the C‐terminus of DBD plays a vital role in binding Dmd. Our comprehensive studies reveal the key region responsible for RnlA toxicity and provide novel insights into its structure–function relationship.     

Identification and functional analysis of two toxin–antitoxin systems in Campylobacter jejuni

Toxin–antitoxin (TA) systems are widely distributed in bacteria and play an important role in maintaining plasmid stability. The leading foodborne pathogen, Campylobacter jejuni, can carry multiple plasmids associated with antibiotic resistance or virulence. Previously a virulence plasmid named pVir was identified in C. jejuni 81‐176 and IA3902, but determining the role of pVir in pathogenesis has been hampered because the plasmid cannot be cured. In this study, we report the identification of two TA systems that are located on the pVir plasmid in 81‐176 and IA3902, respectively. The virA (proteic antitoxin)/virT (proteic toxin) pair in IA3902 belongs to a Type II TA system, while the cjrA (RNA antitoxin)/cjpT (proteic toxin) pair in 81‐176 belongs to a Type I TA system. Notably, cjrA (antitoxin) represents the first noncoding small RNA demonstrated to play a functional role in Campylobacter physiology to date. By inactivating the TA systems, pVir was readily cured from Campylobacter, indicating their functionality in Campylobacter. Using pVir‐cured IA3902, we demonstrated that pVir is not required for abortion induction in the guinea pig model. These findings establish the key role of the TA systems in maintaining plasmid stability and provide a means to evaluate the function of pVir in Campylobacter pathobiology.     

An ADP‐ribosyltransferase Alt of bacteriophage T4 negatively regulates the Escherichia coli MazF toxin of a toxin–antitoxin module

Prokaryotic toxin–antitoxin (TA) systems are linked to many roles in cell physiology, such as plasmid maintenance, stress response, persistence and protection from phage infection, and the activities of toxins are tightly regulated. Here, we describe a novel regulatory mechanism for a toxin of Escherichia coli TA systems. The MazF toxin of MazE‐MazF, which is one of the best characterized type II TA systems, was modified immediately after infection with bacteriophage T4. Mass spectrometry demonstrated that the molecular weight of this modification was 542 Da, corresponding to a mono‐ADP‐ribosylation. This modification disappeared in cells infected with T4 phage lacking Alt, which is one of three ADP‐ribosyltransferases encoded by T4 phage and is injected together with phage DNA upon infection. In vivo and in vitro analyses confirmed that T4 Alt ADP‐ribosylated MazF at an arginine residue at position 4. Finally, the ADP‐ribosylation of MazF by Alt resulted in the reduction of MazF RNA cleavage activity in vitro, suggesting that it may function to inactivate MazF during T4 infection. This is the first example of the chemical modification of an E. coli toxin in TA systems to regulate activity.     

Maintenance of the virulence plasmid in Shigella flexneri is influenced by Lon and two functional partitioning systems

Members of the genus Shigella carry a large plasmid, pINV, which is essential for virulence. In Shigella flexneri, pINV harbours three toxin‐antitoxin (TA) systems, CcdAB, GmvAT and VapBC that promote vertical transmission of the plasmid. Type II TA systems, such as those on pINV, consist of a toxic protein and protein antitoxin. Selective degradation of the antitoxin by proteases leads to the unopposed action of the toxin once genes encoding a TA system have been lost, such as following failure to inherit a plasmid harbouring a TA system. Here, we investigate the role of proteases in the function of the pINV TA systems and demonstrate that Lon, but not ClpP, is required for their activity during plasmid stability. This provides the first evidence that acetyltransferase family TA systems, such as GmvAT, can be regulated by Lon. Interestingly, S. flexneri pINV also harbours two putative partitioning systems, ParAB and StbAB. We show that both systems are functional for plasmid maintenance although their activity is masked by other systems on pINV. Using a model vector based on the pINV replicon, we observe temperature‐dependent differences between the two partitioning systems that contribute to our understanding of the maintenance of virulence in Shigella species.     

A cis‐acting antitoxin domain within the chromosomal toxin–antitoxin module EzeT of Escherichia coli quenches toxin activity

Toxin–antitoxin (TA) systems are widespread genetic modules in the genomes of bacteria and archaea emerging as key players that modulate bacterial physiology. They consist of two parts, a toxic component that blocks an essential cellular process and an antitoxin that inhibits this toxic activity during normal growth. According to the nature of the antitoxin and the mode of inhibition, TA systems are subdivided into different types. Here, we describe the characterization of a type II‐like TA system in Escherichia coli called EzeT. While in conventional type II systems the antitoxin is expressed in trans to form an inactive protein–protein complex, EzeT consists of two domains combining toxin and cis‐acting antitoxin functionalities in a single polypeptide chain. We show that the C‐terminal domain of EzeT is homologous to zeta toxins and is toxic in vivo. The lytic phenotype could be attributed to UDP‐N‐acetylglucosamine phosphorylation, so far only described for type II epsilon/zeta systems from Gram‐positive streptococci. Presence of the N‐terminal domain inhibits toxicity in vivo and strongly attenuates kinase activity. Autoinhibition by a cis‐acting antitoxin as described here for EzeT‐type TA systems can explain the occurrence of single or unusually large toxins, further expanding our understanding of the TA system network.     

A Moderate Toxin,GraT, Modulates Growth Rate and Stress Tolerance of Pseudomonas putida

Chromosomal toxin-antitoxin (TA) systems are widespread among free-living bacteria and are supposedly involved in stress tolerance. Here, we report the first TA system identified in the soil bacterium Pseudomonas putida. The system, encoded by the loci PP1586-PP1585, is conserved in pseudomonads and belongs to the HigBA family. The new TA pair was named GraTA for the growth rate-affecting ability of GraT and the antidote activity of GraA. The GraTA system shares many features common to previously described type II TA systems. The overexpression of GraT is toxic to the antitoxin deletion mutants, since the toxin''s neutralization is achieved by binding of the antitoxin. Also, the graTA operon structure and autoregulation by antitoxin resemble those of other TA loci. However, we were able to delete the antitoxin gene from the chromosome, which shows the unusually mild toxicity of innate GraT compared to previously described toxins. Furthermore, GraT is a temperature-dependent toxin, as its growth-regulating effect becomes more evident at lower temperatures. Besides affecting the growth rate, GraT also increases membrane permeability, resulting in higher sensitivity to some chemicals, e.g., NaCl and paraquat. Nevertheless, the active toxin helps the bacteria survive under different stressful conditions and increases their tolerance to several antibiotics, including streptomycin, kanamycin, and ciprofloxacin. Therefore, our data suggest that GraT may represent a new class of mild chromosomal regulatory toxins that have evolved to be less harmful to their host bacterium. Their moderate toxicity might allow finer growth and metabolism regulation than is possible with strong growth-arresting or bactericidal toxins.