Nucleoid occlusion protein Noc recruits DNA to the bacterial cell membrane

To proliferate efficiently, cells must co‐ordinate division with chromosome segregation. In Bacillus subtilis, the nucleoid occlusion protein Noc binds to specific DNA sequences (NBSs) scattered around the chromosome and helps to protect genomic integrity by coupling the initiation of division to the progression of chromosome replication and segregation. However, how it inhibits division has remained unclear. Here, we demonstrate that Noc associates with the cell membrane via an N‐terminal amphipathic helix, which is necessary for function. Importantly, the membrane‐binding affinity of this helix is weak and requires the assembly of nucleoprotein complexes, thus establishing a mechanism for DNA‐dependent activation of Noc. Furthermore, division inhibition by Noc requires recruitment of NBS DNA to the cell membrane and is dependent on its ability to bind DNA and membrane simultaneously. Indeed, Noc production in a heterologous system is sufficient for recruitment of chromosomal DNA to the membrane. Our results suggest a simple model in which the formation of large membrane‐associated nucleoprotein complexes physically occludes assembly of the division machinery.     

A Replication-Inhibited Unsegregated Nucleoid at Mid-Cell Blocks Z-Ring Formation and Cell Division Independently of SOS and the SlmA Nucleoid Occlusion Protein in Escherichia coli

Chromosome replication and cell division of Escherichia coli are coordinated with growth such that wild-type cells divide once and only once after each replication cycle. To investigate the nature of this coordination, the effects of inhibiting replication on Z-ring formation and cell division were tested in both synchronized and exponentially growing cells with only one replicating chromosome. When replication elongation was blocked by hydroxyurea or nalidixic acid, arrested cells contained one partially replicated, compact nucleoid located mid-cell. Cell division was strongly inhibited at or before the level of Z-ring formation. DNA cross-linking by mitomycin C delayed segregation, and the accumulation of about two chromosome equivalents at mid-cell also blocked Z-ring formation and cell division. Z-ring inhibition occurred independently of SOS, SlmA-mediated nucleoid occlusion, and MinCDE proteins and did not result from a decreased FtsZ protein concentration. We propose that the presence of a compact, incompletely replicated nucleoid or unsegregated chromosome masses at the normal mid-cell division site inhibits Z-ring formation and that the SOS system, SlmA, and MinC are not required for this inhibition.     

Genetic evidence for inhibition of bacterial division protein FtsZ by berberine

Background

Berberine is a plant alkaloid that is widely used as an anti-infective in traditional medicine. Escherichia coli exposed to berberine form filaments, suggesting an antibacterial mechanism that involves inhibition of cell division. Berberine is a DNA ligand and may induce filamentation through induction of the SOS response. Also, there is biochemical evidence for berberine inhibition of the cell division protein FtsZ. Here we aimed to assess possible berberine mechanism(s) of action in growing bacteria using genetics tools.

Methodology/Principal Findings

First, we tested whether berberine inhibits bacterial growth through DNA damage and induction of the SOS response. The SOS response induced by berberine was much lower compared to that induced by mitomycin C in an SOS response reporter strain. Also, cell filamentation was observed in an SOS-negative E. coli strain. To test whether berberine inhibits FtsZ, we assessed its effects on formation of the cell division Z-rings, and observed a dramatic reduction in Z-rings in the presence of berberine. We next used two different strategies for RNA silencing of ftsZ and both resulted in sensitisation of bacteria to berberine, visible as a drop in the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC). Furthermore, Fractional Inhibitory Concentration Indices (FICIs) showed a high level of synergy between ftsZ silencing and berberine treatment (FICI values of 0.23 and 0.25 for peptide nucleic acid- and expressed antisense RNA-based silencing of ftsZ, respectively). Finally, over-expression of ftsZ led to a mild rescue effect in berberine-treated cells.

Conclusions

The results argue against DNA binding as the primary mechanism of action of berberine and support the hypothesis that its antibacterial properties are due to inhibition of the cell division protein FtsZ. In addition, the genetic approach used here provides a means to rapidly test the activity of other putative FtsZ inhibitors.     

Interaction of Penicillin‐Binding Protein 2x and Ser/Thr protein kinase StkP,two key players in Streptococcus pneumoniae R6 morphogenesis

Bacterial cell growth and division require the co‐ordinated action of peptidoglycan biosynthetic enzymes and cell morphogenesis proteins. However, the regulatory mechanisms that allow generating proper bacterial shape and thus preserving cell integrity remain largely uncharacterized, especially in ovococci. Recently, the conserved eukaryotic‐like Ser/Thr protein kinase of Streptococcus pneumoniae (StkP) was demonstrated to play a major role in cell shape and division. Here, we investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying the regulatory function(s) of StkP and show that it involves one of the essential actors of septal peptidoglycan synthesis, Penicillin‐Binding Protein 2x (PBP2x). We demonstrate that StkP and PBP2x interact directly and are present in the same membrane‐associated complex in S. pneumoniae. We further show that they both display a late‐division localization pattern at the division site and that the positioning of PBP2x depends on the presence of the extracellular PASTA domains of StkP. We demonstrate that StkP and PBP2x interaction is mediated by their extracellular regions and that the complex formation is inhibited in vitro in the presence of cell wall fragments. These data suggest that the role of StkP in cell division is modulated by an interaction with PBP2x.     

An essential enzyme for phospholipid synthesis associates with the Bacillus subtilis divisome

The mechanism by which the membrane synthetic machinery might be co‐organized with the cell‐division architecture during the bacterial cell cycle remains to be investigated. We characterized a key enzyme of phospholipid and fatty acid synthesis in Bacillus subtilis, the acyl–acyl carrier protein phosphate acyltransferase (PlsX), and identified it as a component of the cell‐division machinery. Comprehensive interaction analysis revealed that PlsX interacts with FtsA, the FtsZ‐anchoring protein. PlsX mainly localized at the potential division site independent of FtsA and FtsZ and then colocalized with FtsA. By multidirectional approaches, we revealed that the Z‐ring stabilizes the association of PlsX at the septum and pole. The localization of PlsX is also affected by the progression of DNA replication. PlsX is needed for cell division and its inactivation leads to aberrant Z‐ring formation. We propose that PlsX localization is prior to Z‐ring formation in the hierarchy of septum formation events and that PlsX is important for co‐ordinating membrane synthesis with cell division in order to properly complete septum formation.     

Building bridges: formin1 of Arabidopsis forms a connection between the cell wall and the actin cytoskeleton

Actin microfilament (MF) organization and remodelling is critical to cell function. The formin family of actin binding proteins are involved in nucleating MFs in Arabidopsis thaliana. They all contain formin homology domains in the intracellular, C‐terminal half of the protein that interacts with MFs. Formins in class I are usually targeted to the plasma membrane and this is true of Formin1 (AtFH1) of A. thaliana. In this study, we have investigated the extracellular domain of AtFH1 and we demonstrate that AtFH1 forms a bridge from the actin cytoskeleton, across the plasma membrane and is anchored within the cell wall. AtFH1 has a large, extracellular domain that is maintained by purifying selection and that contains four conserved regions, one of which is responsible for immobilising the protein. Protein anchoring within the cell wall is reduced in constructs that express truncations of the extracellular domain and in experiments in protoplasts without primary cell walls. The 18 amino acid proline‐rich extracellular domain that is responsible for AtFH1 anchoring has homology with cell‐wall extensins. We also have shown that anchoring of AtFH1 in the cell wall promotes actin bundling within the cell and that overexpression of AtFH1 has an inhibitory effect on organelle actin‐dependant dynamics. Thus, the AtFH1 bridge provides stable anchor points for the actin cytoskeleton and is probably a crucial component of the signalling response and actin‐remodelling mechanisms.     

Bacterial SOS Checkpoint Protein SulA Inhibits Polymerization of Purified FtsZ Cell Division Protein

Cell division of Escherichia coli is inhibited when the SulA protein is induced in response to DNA damage as part of the SOS checkpoint control system. The SulA protein interacts with the tubulin-like FtsZ division protein. We investigated the effects of purified SulA upon FtsZ. SulA protein inhibits the polymerization and the GTPase activity of FtsZ, while point mutant SulA proteins show little effect on either of these FtsZ activities. SulA did not inhibit the polymerization of purified FtsZ2 mutant protein, which was originally isolated as insensitive to SulA. These studies define polymerization assays for FtsZ which respond to an authentic cellular regulator. The observations presented here support the notion that polymerization of FtsZ is central to its cellular role and that direct, reversible inhibition of FtsZ polymerization by SulA may account for division inhibition.     

The σE stress response is required for stress‐induced mutation and amplification in Escherichia coli

Pathways of mutagenesis are induced in microbes under adverse conditions controlled by stress responses. Control of mutagenesis by stress responses may accelerate evolution specifically when cells are maladapted to their environments, i.e. are stressed. Stress‐induced mutagenesis in the Escherichia coli Lac assay occurs either by ‘point’ mutation or gene amplification. Point mutagenesis is associated with DNA double‐strand‐break (DSB) repair and requires DinB error‐prone DNA polymerase and the SOS DNA‐damage‐ and RpoS general‐stress responses. We report that the RpoE envelope‐protein‐stress response is also required. In a screen for mutagenesis‐defective mutants, we isolated a transposon insertion in the rpoE P2 promoter. The insertion prevents rpoE induction during stress, but leaves constitutive expression intact, and allows cell viability. rpoE insertion and suppressed null mutants display reduced point mutagenesis and maintenance of amplified DNA. Furthermore, σ^E acts independently of stress responses previously implicated: SOS/DinB and RpoS, and of σ³², which was postulated to affect mutagenesis. I‐SceI‐induced DSBs alleviated much of the rpoE phenotype, implying that σ^E promoted DSB formation. Thus, a third stress response and stress input regulate DSB‐repair‐associated stress‐induced mutagenesis. This provides the first report of mutagenesis promoted by σ^E, and implies that extracytoplasmic stressors may affect genome integrity and, potentially, the ability to evolve.     

Restriction in vivo

Summary Degradation products of restricted T4 DNA induced filamentation, mutagenesis, and to a lesser extent, synthesis of recA protein in wild type cells but not in recA, lexA or recBC mutants of Escherichia coli. We conclude that the structural damage to the DNA caused by restriction cleavage and exonuclease V degradation can induce SOS functions. Degradation of restricted nonglucosylated T4 DNA by exonuclease V delayed cell division and induced filament formation and mutagenesis in lexA ⁺ but not in lexA ^- cells. Delay of cell division was also dependent upon recA and recBC funtions. Such degradation of DNA also dramatically increased mutagenesis in tif ^- Sfi^- cells at 42°C. The synthesis of recA protein continued in the restricting host after infection by the nonglucosylated T4 phage, but enhanced synthesis is not induced to the extent seen in SOS induced tif ^- cells grown at 42°. We also found that restriction of nonglucosylated T4 was alleviated in UV irradiated cells. The UV induced alleviation of rgl and r _K restriction depended upon post irradiation protein synthesis and was not observed in recA, lexA or recBC mutants.     

Regulation and SOS induction of division inhibition in Escherichia coli K12

Summary When Escherichia coli is subjected to treatments that damage DNA or perturb DNA replication considerable cell filamentation occurs. It has been postulated that this phenomenon is associated with the presence of a division inhibitor induced coordinately with the SOS functions. The role of this induction would be to delay septation during DNA repair to prevent the formation of DNAless cells. In this communication, we present evidence for such a division inhibitor based on the properties of a division mutant which is hyperactive in the septation delay. Cells of this mutant filament extensively after a nutritional shift-up, have drastically reduced colony-forming abilities on a rich medium but not on a minimal medium following treatment with ultraviolet radiation and, are deficient in the lysogenization of phage lambda; phenotypes which are characteristic of but expressed to a much lower extent in another type of division mutant called lon. Cells harboring the division mutation plus either one of the lexA mutant alleles, spr-51 or tsl-1, are filamentous suggesting that they are permanently derepressed for division inhibition. These results are in agreement with models that assign the regulation of cell division to a division inhibitor which is regulated by the lexA repressor protein.     

DipM,a new factor required for peptidoglycan remodelling during cell division in Caulobacter crescentus

In bacteria, cytokinesis is dependent on lytic enzymes that facilitate remodelling of the cell wall during constriction. In this work, we identify a thus far uncharacterized periplasmic protein, DipM, that is required for cell division and polarity in Caulobacter crescentus. DipM is composed of four peptidoglycan binding (LysM) domains and a C‐terminal lysostaphin‐like (LytM) peptidase domain. It binds to isolated murein sacculi in vitro, and is recruited to the site of constriction through interaction with the cell division protein FtsN. Mutational analyses showed that the LysM domains are necessary and sufficient for localization of DipM, while its peptidase domain is essential for function. Consistent with a role in cell wall hydrolysis, DipM was found to interact with purified murein sacculi in vitro and to induce cell lysis upon overproduction. Its inactivation causes severe defects in outer membrane invagination, resulting in a significant delay between cytoplasmic compartmentalization and final separation of the daughter cells. Overall, these findings indicate that DipM is a periplasmic component of the C. crescentus divisome that facilitates remodelling of the peptidoglycan layer and, thus, coordinated constriction of the cell envelope during the division process.     

Repair on the Go: E. coli Maintains a High Proliferation Rate while Repairing a Chronic DNA Double-Strand Break

DNA damage checkpoints exist to promote cell survival and the faithful inheritance of genetic information. It is thought that one function of such checkpoints is to ensure that cell division does not occur before DNA damage is repaired. However, in unicellular organisms, rapid cell multiplication confers a powerful selective advantage, leading to a dilemma. Is the activation of a DNA damage checkpoint compatible with rapid cell multiplication? By uncoupling the initiation of DNA replication from cell division, the Escherichia coli cell cycle offers a solution to this dilemma. Here, we show that a DNA double-strand break, which occurs once per replication cycle, induces the SOS response. This SOS induction is needed for cell survival due to a requirement for an elevated level of expression of the RecA protein. Cell division is delayed, leading to an increase in average cell length but with no detectable consequence on mutagenesis and little effect on growth rate and viability. The increase in cell length caused by chronic DNA double-strand break repair comprises three components: two types of increase in the unit cell size, one independent of SfiA and SlmA, the other dependent of the presence of SfiA and the absence of SlmA, and a filamentation component that is dependent on the presence of either SfiA or SlmA. These results imply that chronic checkpoint induction in E. coli is compatible with rapid cell multiplication. Therefore, under conditions of chronic low-level DNA damage, the SOS checkpoint operates seamlessly in a cell cycle where the initiation of DNA replication is uncoupled from cell division.     

Inhibition of bacterial segregation by early functions of phage Mu and association of replication protein B with the inner cell membrane

Summary Infection of Mu-sensitive bacteria with a recombinant phage that carries the EcoRI·C fragment from the immunity end of wild type Mu DNA causes filamentous growth. Transmission electron microscopy revealed that the cell-division cycle was inhibited at, or prior to, the initiation of septation. The filamentation does not occur after infection of Mu-immune bacteria or after infection with a phage carrying the same EcoRI·C fragment, but with an IS1 insertion in gene B of Mu, showing that either gpB and/or some non-essential functions (e.g. kil) mapping downstream from the insertion are required for the inhibition of cell division. These data and previously published evidence suggest that in the killing of E. coli K12 by early Mu functions expressed from the cloned EcoRI·C fragment, two components have to be distinguished: one, a highly efficient elimination of plasmid DNA carrying the early Mu genes, and second, a series of interactions with host functions conducent to an inhibition of cell division. It is suggested that functions normally involved in the SOS reaction participtate in the inhibition of cell division by early Mu functions. Infected bacteria synthesize the replication protein B (M_R 33000) of Mu, which was found by cell fractionation experiments to be associated with the inner cell membrane. The role of this association for filamentous growth and for the integrative replication of the phage is discussed. The recombinant phage might be useful as a tool for the study of the E. coli cell division cycle.     

RnhP is a plasmid‐borne RNase HI that contributes to genome maintenance in the ancestral strain Bacillus subtilis NCIB 3610

RNA‐DNA hybrids form throughout the chromosome during normal growth and under stress conditions. When left unresolved, RNA‐DNA hybrids can slow replication fork progression, cause DNA breaks, and increase mutagenesis. To remove hybrids, all organisms use ribonuclease H (RNase H) to specifically degrade the RNA portion. Here we show that, in addition to chromosomally encoded RNase HII and RNase HIII, Bacillus subtilis NCIB 3610 encodes a previously uncharacterized RNase HI protein, RnhP, on the endogenous plasmid pBS32. Like other RNase HI enzymes, RnhP incises Okazaki fragments, ribopatches, and a complementary RNA‐DNA hybrid. We show that while chromosomally encoded RNase HIII is required for pBS32 hyper‐replication, RnhP compensates for the loss of RNase HIII activity on the chromosome. Consequently, loss of RnhP and RNase HIII impairs bacterial growth. We show that the decreased growth rate can be explained by laggard replication fork progression near the terminus region of the right replichore, resulting in SOS induction and inhibition of cell division. We conclude that all three functional RNase H enzymes are present in B. subtilis NCIB 3610 and that the plasmid‐encoded RNase HI contributes to chromosome stability, while the chromosomally encoded RNase HIII is important for chromosome stability and plasmid hyper‐replication.     

Identification of a protein,YneA, responsible for cell division suppression during the SOS response in Bacillus subtilis

A knock-out mutant of the dinR gene that encodes the SOS regulon repressor in Bacillus subtilis was constructed. The yneA, yneB and ynzC genes transcribed divergently from the dinR gene were strongly induced in mutant cells. Northern hybridization analyses revealed that these genes collectively form an operon and belong to the SOS regulon. The simultaneous deletion of dinR and yneA suppressed the filamentous phenotype of the dinR mutant. Furthermore, although yneA is suppressed in the wild-type cell in the absence of SOS induction, artificial expression of the YneA protein using an IPTG-inducible promoter resulted in cell elongation. Disruption of yneA significantly reduced cell elongation after the induction of the SOS response by mitomycin C in dinR+ cells. These results indicate that the YneA protein is responsible for cell division suppression during the SOS response in B. subtilis. Localization of the FtsZ protein to the cell division site was reduced in dinR-disrupted or yneA-expressing cells, further suggesting that the YneA protein suppresses cell division through the suppression of FtsZ ring formation. Interestingly, the B. subtilis YneA protein is structurally and phylogenetically unrelated to its functional counterpart in Escherichia coli, SulA.