Long-range chromatin reorganization of the human serpin gene cluster at 14q32.1 accompanies gene activation and extinction in microcell hybrids

The genes encoding alpha1-antitrypsin (alpha1AT, gene symbol PI) and corticosteroid-binding globulin (CBG) are part of a cluster of six serine protease inhibitor (serpin) genes located on human chromosome 14q32.1. Both genes are actively transcribed in the liver and in human hepatoma cells, but they are not expressed in most other cell types. In this study we mapped DNase I-hypersensitive sites (DHSs) in an approximately 130-kb region of 14q32.1 that includes both genes. The distributions of DHSs in expressing (HepG2) vs nonexpressing (HeLa S3) cells were very different: HepG2 cells displayed 29 DHSs in this interval, but only 7 of those sites were present in HeLa cells. To determine the chromatin organization of activated or extinguished serpin alleles, we transferred human chromosome 14 into rat hepatoma cells or fibroblasts, respectively. Human alpha1AT and CBG gene expression was activated in rat hepatoma microcell hybrids containing human chromosome 14, but extinguished in rat fibroblast hybrids with the same genotype. DHS mapping in these microcell hybrids demonstrated that the chromatin structure of the entire 130-kb region was reorganized in microcell hybrids, and the distributions of DHSs in activated and extinguished alleles recapitulated those of expressing and nonexpressing cells, respectively. Thus, microcell hybrids provide a system in which reproducible changes in gene activity and long-range chromatin organization can be induced experimentally. This provides a basis for studying the effects of targeted modifications of the alpha1AT and CBG loci on the regulation of gene activity and chromatin structure.     

Polycomb group repression is blocked by the Drosophila suppressor of Hairy-wing [su(Hw)] insulator.

The suppressor of Hairy-wing [SU(HW)] binding region disrupts communication between a large number of enhancers and promoters and protects transgenes from chromosomal position effects. These properties classify the SU(HW) binding region as an insulator. While enhancers are blocked in a general manner, protection from repressors appears to be more variable. In these studies, we address whether repression resulting from the Polycomb group genes can be blocked by the SU(HW) binding region. The effects of this binding region on repression established by an Ultrabithorax Polycomb group Response Element were examined. A transposon carrying two reporter genes, the yellow and white genes, was used so that repression and insulation could be assayed simultaneously. We demonstrate that the SU(HW) binding region is effective at preventing Polycomb group repression. These studies suggest that one role of the su(Hw) protein may be to restrict the range of action of repressors, such as the Polycomb group proteins, throughout the euchromatic regions of the genome.     

Polycomb group proteins Ezh2 and Rnf2 direct genomic contraction and imprinted repression in early mouse embryos

Genomic imprinting regulates parental-specific expression of particular genes and is required for normal mammalian development. How imprinting is established during development is, however, largely unknown. To address this question, we studied the mouse Kcnq1 imprinted cluster at which paternal-specific silencing depends on expression of the noncoding RNA Kcnq1ot1. We show that Kcnq1ot1 is expressed from the zygote stage onward and rapidly associates with chromatin marked by Polycomb group (PcG) proteins and repressive histone modifications, forming a discrete repressive nuclear compartment devoid of RNA polymerase II, a configuration also observed at the Igf2r imprinted cluster. In this compartment, the paternal Kcnq1 cluster exists in a three-dimensionally contracted state. In vivo the PcG proteins Ezh2 and Rnf2 are independently required for genomic contraction and imprinted silencing. We propose that the formation of a parental-specific higher-order chromatin organization renders imprint clusters competent for monoallelic silencing and assign a central role to PcG proteins in this process.     

Overlapping but distinct RNA elements control repression and activation of nanos translation

Spatially restricted synthesis of Nanos protein in the Drosophila embryo is essential for anterior-posterior patterning. Nanos translation is restricted to the posterior of the embryo by translational repression of nanos mRNA throughout the bulk cytoplasm and selective activation of posteriorly localized nanos mRNA. A 90-nucleotide translational control element (TCE) mediates translational repression. We show that TCE function requires formation of a bipartite secondary structure that is recognized by Smaug repressor and at least one additional factor. We also demonstrate that translational activation requires the interaction of localization factors with sequences that overlap TCE structural motifs. The identification of separate but overlapping recognition motifs for translational repressors and localization factors provides a molecular mechanism for the switch between translational repression and activation.     

Exploring CTCF and cohesin related chromatin architecture at HOXA gene cluster in primary human fibroblasts

Spatial expression patterns of homeobox(HOX) genes delineate positional identity of primary fibroblasts from different topographic sites. The molecular mechanism underlying the establishing or maintaining of HOX gene expression pattern remains an attractive developmental issue to be addressed. Our previous work suggested a critical role of CTCF/cohesin-mediated higher-order chromatin structure in RA-induced HOXA activation in human teratocarcinoma NT2/D1 cells. This study investigated the recruitment of CTCF and cohesin, and the higher-order chromatin structure of the HOXA locus in fetal lung and adult foreskin fibroblasts, which display complementary HOXA gene expression patterns. Chromatin contacts between the CTCF-binding sites were observed with lower frequency in human foreskin fibroblasts. This observation is consistent with the lower level of cohesin recruitment and 5′ HOXA gene expression in the same cells. We also showed that CTCF-binding site A56(CBSA56) related chromatin structures exhibit the most notable changes in between the two types of cell, and hence may stand for one of the key CTCF-binding sites for cell-type specific chromatin structure organization. Together, these results imply that CTCF/cohesin coordinates HOXA cluster higher-order chromatin structure and expression during development, and provide insight into the relationship between cell-type specific chromatin organization and the spatial collinearity.