How to choose templates for modeling of protein complexes: Insights from benchmarking template-based docking

Comparative docking is based on experimentally determined structures of protein-protein complexes (templates), following the paradigm that proteins with similar sequences and/or structures form similar complexes. Modeling utilizing structure similarity of target monomers to template complexes significantly expands structural coverage of the interactome. Template-based docking by structure alignment can be performed for the entire structures or by aligning targets to the bound interfaces of the experimentally determined complexes. Systematic benchmarking of docking protocols based on full and interface structure alignment showed that both protocols perform similarly, with top 1 docking success rate 26%. However, in terms of the models' quality, the interface-based docking performed marginally better. The interface-based docking is preferable when one would suspect a significant conformational change in the full protein structure upon binding, for example, a rearrangement of the domains in multidomain proteins. Importantly, if the same structure is selected as the top template by both full and interface alignment, the docking success rate increases 2-fold for both top 1 and top 10 predictions. Matching structural annotations of the target and template proteins for template detection, as a computationally less expensive alternative to structural alignment, did not improve the docking performance. Sophisticated remote sequence homology detection added templates to the pool of those identified by structure-based alignment, suggesting that for practical docking, the combination of the structure alignment protocols and the remote sequence homology detection may be useful in order to avoid potential flaws in generation of the structural templates library.     

Prediction of ligand-binding sites of proteins by molecular docking calculation for a random ligand library

A new approach to predicting the ligand-binding sites of proteins was developed, using protein-ligand docking computation. In this method, many compounds in a random library are docked onto the whole protein surface. We assumed that the true ligand-binding site would exhibit stronger affinity to the compounds in the random library than the other sites, even if the random library did not include the ligand corresponding to the true binding site. We also assumed that the affinity of the true ligand-binding site would be correlated to the docking scores of the compounds in the random library, if the ligand-binding site was correctly predicted. We call this method the molecular-docking binding-site finding (MolSite) method. The MolSite method was applied to 89 known protein-ligand complex structures extracted from the Protein Data Bank, and it predicted the correct binding sites with about 80-99% accuracy, when only the single top-ranked site was adopted. In addition, the average docking score was weakly correlated to the experimental protein-ligand binding free energy, with a correlation coefficient of 0.44.     

Protein function annotation by local binding site surface similarity

Hundreds of protein crystal structures exist for proteins whose function cannot be confidently determined from sequence similarity. Surflex‐PSIM, a previously reported surface‐based protein similarity algorithm, provides an alternative method for hypothesizing function for such proteins. The method now supports fully automatic binding site detection and is fast enough to screen comprehensive databases of protein binding sites. The binding site detection methodology was validated on apo/holo cognate protein pairs, correctly identifying 91% of ligand binding sites in holo structures and 88% in apo structures where corresponding sites existed. For correctly detected apo binding sites, the cognate holo site was the most similar binding site 87% of the time. PSIM was used to screen a set of proteins that had poorly characterized functions at the time of crystallization, but were later biochemically annotated. Using a fully automated protocol, this set of 8 proteins was screened against ～60,000 ligand binding sites from the PDB. PSIM correctly identified functional matches that predated query protein biochemical annotation for five out of the eight query proteins. A panel of 12 currently unannotated proteins was also screened, resulting in a large number of statistically significant binding site matches, some of which suggest likely functions for the podorly characterized proteins. Proteins 2014; 82:679–694. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Prefoldin recognition motifs in the nonhomologous proteins of the actin and tubulin families

Nascent actin and tubulin molecules undergo a series of complex interactions with chaperones and are thereby guided to their native conformation. These cytoskeletal proteins have the initial part of the pathway in common: both interact with prefoldin and with the cytosolic chaperonin containing tailless complex polypeptide 1. Little is understood with regard to how these chaperones and, in particular, prefoldin recognize the non-native forms of these target proteins. Using mutagenesis, we provide evidence that beta-actin and alpha-tubulin each have two prefoldin interaction sites. The most amino-terminally located site of both proteins shows striking sequence similarity, although these proteins are nonhomologous. Very similar motifs are present in beta- and gamma-tubulin and in the newly identified prefoldin target protein actin-related protein 1. Actin-related proteins 2 and 3 have related motifs, but these have altered charge properties. The latter two proteins do not bind prefoldin, although we identify them here as target proteins for the cytosolic chaperonin. Actin fragments containing the two prefoldin interaction regions compete efficiently with actin for prefoldin binding. In addition, they also compete with tubulins, suggesting that these target proteins contact similar prefoldin subunits.     

Target selectivity in EF-hand calcium binding proteins

EF-hand calcium binding proteins have remarkable sequence homology and structural similarity, yet their response to binding of calcium is diverse and they function in a wide range of biological processes. Knowledge of the fine-tuning of EF-hand protein sequences to optimize specific biochemical properties has been significantly advanced over the past 10 years by determination of atomic resolution structures. These data lay the foundation for addressing how functional selectivity is generated from a generic ionic signal. This review presents current ideas about the structural mechanisms that provide the selectivity of different EF-hand proteins for specific cellular targets, using S100 and calmodulin family proteins to demonstrate the critical concepts. Three factors contribute significantly to target selectivity: molecular architecture, response to binding of Ca(2+) ions, and the characteristics of target binding surfaces. Comparisons of calmodulin and S100 proteins provide insights into the role these factors play in facilitating the variety of binding configurations necessary for recognizing a diverse set of targets.     

Prediction of residues involved in inhibitor specificity in the dihydrofolate reductase family

Dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) is of significant recent interest as a target for drugs against parasitic and opportunistic infections. Understanding factors which influence DHFR homolog inhibitor specificity is critical for the design of compounds that selectively target DHFRs from pathogenic organisms over the human homolog. This paper presents a novel approach for predicting residues involved in ligand discrimination in a protein family using DHFR as a model system. In this approach, the relationship between inhibitor specificity and amino acid composition for sets of protein homolog pairs is examined. Similar inhibitor specificity profiles correlate with increased sequence homology at specific alignment positions. Residue positions that exhibit the strongest correlations are predicted as specificity determinants. Correlation analysis requires a quantitative measure of similarity in inhibitor specificity (S(lig)) for a pair of homologs. To this end, a method of calculating S(lig) values using K(I) values for the two homologs against a set of inhibitors as input was developed. Correlation analysis of S(lig) values to amino acid sequence similarity scores - obtained via multiple sequence alignments - was performed for individual residue alignment positions and sets of residues on 13 DHFRs. Eighteen alignment positions were identified with a strong correlation of S(lig) to sequence similarity. Of these, three lie in the active site; four are located proximal to the active site, four are clustered together in the adenosine binding domain and five on the βFβG loop. The validity of the method is supported by agreement between experimental findings and current predictions involving active site residues.     

Mapping of ligand‐binding cavities in proteins

The complex interactions between proteins and small organic molecules (ligands) are intensively studied because they play key roles in biological processes and drug activities. Here, we present a novel approach to characterize and map the ligand‐binding cavities of proteins without direct geometric comparison of structures, based on Principal Component Analysis of cavity properties (related mainly to size, polarity, and charge). This approach can provide valuable information on the similarities and dissimilarities, of binding cavities due to mutations, between‐species differences and flexibility upon ligand‐binding. The presented results show that information on ligand‐binding cavity variations can complement information on protein similarity obtained from sequence comparisons. The predictive aspect of the method is exemplified by successful predictions of serine proteases that were not included in the model construction. The presented strategy to compare ligand‐binding cavities of related and unrelated proteins has many potential applications within protein and medicinal chemistry, for example in the characterization and mapping of “orphan structures”, selection of protein structures for docking studies in structure‐based design, and identification of proteins for selectivity screens in drug design programs. Proteins 2010. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

A benchmark testing ground for integrating homology modeling and protein docking

Protein docking procedures carry out the task of predicting the structure of a protein–protein complex starting from the known structures of the individual protein components. More often than not, however, the structure of one or both components is not known, but can be derived by homology modeling on the basis of known structures of related proteins deposited in the Protein Data Bank (PDB). Thus, the problem is to develop methods that optimally integrate homology modeling and docking with the goal of predicting the structure of a complex directly from the amino acid sequences of its component proteins. One possibility is to use the best available homology modeling and docking methods. However, the models built for the individual subunits often differ to a significant degree from the bound conformation in the complex, often much more so than the differences observed between free and bound structures of the same protein, and therefore additional conformational adjustments, both at the backbone and side chain levels need to be modeled to achieve an accurate docking prediction. In particular, even homology models of overall good accuracy frequently include localized errors that unfavorably impact docking results. The predicted reliability of the different regions in the model can also serve as a useful input for the docking calculations. Here we present a benchmark dataset that should help to explore and solve combined modeling and docking problems. This dataset comprises a subset of the experimentally solved ‘target’ complexes from the widely used Docking Benchmark from the Weng Lab (excluding antibody–antigen complexes). This subset is extended to include the structures from the PDB related to those of the individual components of each complex, and hence represent potential templates for investigating and benchmarking integrated homology modeling and docking approaches. Template sets can be dynamically customized by specifying ranges in sequence similarity and in PDB release dates, or using other filtering options, such as excluding sets of specific structures from the template list. Multiple sequence alignments, as well as structural alignments of the templates to their corresponding subunits in the target are also provided. The resource is accessible online or can be downloaded at http://cluspro.org/benchmark , and is updated on a weekly basis in synchrony with new PDB releases. Proteins 2016; 85:10–16. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Towards in silico lead optimization: scores from ensembles of protein/ligand conformations reliably correlate with biological activity

Accurately ranking protein/ligand interactions and distinguishing subtle differences between homologous compounds in a virtual focused library in silico is essential in a structure-based drug discovery program. In order to establish a predictive model to design novel inhibitors of dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) from the parasitic protozoa, Cryptosporidium hominis, we docked a series of 30 DHFR inhibitors with measured inhibition constants against the crystal structure of the protein. By including protein flexibility and averaging the energies of the 25 lowest protein/ligand conformers we obtained more accurate total nonbonded energies from which we calculated a predicted biological activity. The calculated and measured biological activities showed reliable correlations of 72.9%. Additionally, visual analysis of the ensemble of protein/ligand conformations revealed alternative ligand binding pockets in the active site. Using the same principles we then created a homology model of DHFR from Toxoplasma gondii and docked 11 inhibitors. A correlation of 50.2% between docking score and activity validates both the method and the model. The correlations presented here are particularly compelling considering the high structural similarity of the ligands and the fact that we have used structures derived from crystallographic data and homology modeling. These docking principles may be useful in any lead optimization study where accurate ranking of similar compounds is desired.     

Comparison analysis of primary ligand‐binding sites in seven‐helix membrane proteins

Seven‐helix transmembrane proteins, including the G‐protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs), mediate a broad range of fundamental cellular activities through binding to a wide range of ligands. Understanding the structural basis for the ligand‐binding selectivity of these proteins is of significance to their structure‐based drug design. Comparison analysis of proteins' ligand‐binding sites provides a useful way to study their structure‐activity relationships. Various computational methods have been developed for the binding‐site comparison of soluble proteins. In this work, we applied this approach to the analysis of the primary ligand‐binding sites of 92 seven‐helix transmembrane proteins. Results of the studies confirmed that the binding site of bacterial rhodopsins is indeed different from all GPCRs. In the latter group, further comparison of the binding sites indicated a group of residues that could be responsible for ligand‐binding selectivity and important for structure‐based drug design. Furthermore, unexpected binding‐site dissimilarities were observed among adrenergic and adenosine receptors, suggesting that the percentage of the overall sequence identity between a target protein and a template protein alone is not sufficient for selecting the best template for homology modeling of seven‐helix membrane proteins. These results provided novel insight into the structural basis of ligand‐binding selectivity of seven‐helix membrane proteins and are of practical use to the computational modeling of these proteins. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biopolymers 95: 31–38, 2011.     

Virtual screening and bioassay study of novel inhibitors for dengue virus mRNA cap (nucleoside-2'O)-methyltransferase

We report high-throughput structure-based virtual screening of putative Flavivirus 2′-O-methyltransferase inhibitors together with results from subsequent bioassay tests of selected compounds. Potential inhibitors for the S-adenosylmethionine binding site were explored using 2D similarity searching, pharmacophore filtering and docking. The inhibitory activities of 15 top-ranking compounds from the docking calculations were tested on a recombinant methyltransferase with the RNA substrate ^7MeGpppAC₅. Local and global docking simulations were combined to estimate the ligand selectivity for the target site. The results of the combined computational and experimental screening identified a novel inhibitor, with a previously unknown scaffold, that has an IC₅₀ value of 60 μM.     

An efficient computational method for calculating ligand binding affinities

Virtual compound screening using molecular docking is widely used in the discovery of new lead compounds for drug design. However, the docking scores are not sufficiently precise to represent the protein-ligand binding affinity. Here, we developed an efficient computational method for calculating protein-ligand binding affinity, which is based on molecular mechanics generalized Born/surface area (MM-GBSA) calculations and Jarzynski identity. Jarzynski identity is an exact relation between free energy differences and the work done through non-equilibrium process, and MM-GBSA is a semimacroscopic approach to calculate the potential energy. To calculate the work distribution when a ligand is pulled out of its binding site, multiple protein-ligand conformations are randomly generated as an alternative to performing an explicit single-molecule pulling simulation. We assessed the new method, multiple random conformation/MM-GBSA (MRC-MMGBSA), by evaluating ligand-binding affinities (scores) for four target proteins, and comparing these scores with experimental data. The calculated scores were qualitatively in good agreement with the experimental binding affinities, and the optimal docking structure could be determined by ranking the scores of the multiple docking poses obtained by the molecular docking process. Furthermore, the scores showed a strong linear response to experimental binding free energies, so that the free energy difference of the ligand binding (ΔΔG) could be calculated by linear scaling of the scores. The error of calculated ΔΔG was within ≈±1.5 kcal•mol⁻¹ of the experimental values. Particularly, in the case of flexible target proteins, the MRC-MMGBSA scores were more effective in ranking ligands than those generated by the MM-GBSA method using a single protein-ligand conformation. The results suggest that, owing to its lower computational costs and greater accuracy, the MRC-MMGBSA offers efficient means to rank the ligands, in the post-docking process, according to their binding affinities, and to compare these directly with the experimental values.     

Incorporating biochemical information and backbone flexibility in RosettaDock for CAPRI rounds 6-12

In CAPRI rounds 6-12, RosettaDock successfully predicted 2 of 5 unbound-unbound targets to medium accuracy. Improvement over the previous method was achieved with computational mutagenesis to select decoys that match the energetics of experimentally determined hot spots. In the case of Target 21, Orc1/Sir1, this resulted in a successful docking prediction where RosettaDock alone or with simple site constraints failed. Experimental information also helped limit the interacting region of TolB/Pal, producing a successful prediction of Target 26. In addition, we docked multiple loop conformations for Target 20, and we developed a novel flexible docking algorithm to simultaneously optimize backbone conformation and rigid-body orientation to generate a wide diversity of conformations for Target 24. Continued challenges included docking of homology targets that differ substantially from their template (sequence identity <50%) and accounting for large conformational changes upon binding. Despite a larger number of unbound-unbound and homology model binding targets, Rounds 6-12 reinforced that RosettaDock is a powerful algorithm for predicting bound complex structures, especially when combined with experimental data.     

Ligand binding and homology modelling of insect odorant‐binding proteins

This review describes the main characteristics of odorant‐binding proteins (OBPs) for homology modelling and presents a summary of structure prediction studies on insect OBPs, along with the steps involved and some limitations and improvements. The technique involves a computing approach to model protein structures and is based on a comparison between a target (unknown structure) and one or more templates (experimentally determined structures). As targets for structure prediction, OBPs are considered to play a functional role for recognition, desorption, scavenging, protection and transportation of hydrophobic molecules (odourants) across an aqueous environment (lymph) to olfactory receptor neurones (ORNs) located in sensilla, the main olfactory units of insect antennae. Lepidopteran pheromone‐binding proteins, a subgroup of OBPs, are characterized by remarkable structural features, in which high sequence identities (approximately 30%) among these OBPs and a large number of available templates can facilitate the prediction of precise homology models. Approximately 30 studies have been performed on insect OBPs using homology modelling as a tool to predict their structures. Although some of the studies have assessed ligand‐binding affinity using structural information and biochemical measurements, few have performed docking and molecular dynamic (MD) simulations as a virtual method to predict best ligands. Docking and MD simulations are discussed in the context of discovery of novel semiochemicals (super‐ligands) using homology modelling to conceive further strategies in insect management.     

Comparisons between the three-dimensional structures of the chemotactic protein CheY and the normal Gly 12-p21 protein

The three-dimensional structure of a chemotactic protein CheY from Salmonella typhimurium has recently been determined by X-ray crystallography. The structure of this small protein, containing 129 amino acid residues, shows a domain consisting of a central beta-pleated sheet surrounded on both sides by alpha-helices. We have examined the sequence and the arrangement of the structural domains of the CheY protein and have compared them with other nucleotide binding protein sequences and structures. We find that the CheY protein has significant sequence homology to the ras-gene encoded p21 protein. In addition, the structural domains of the two proteins are arranged in a fundamentally similar manner, including the phosphate-binding site (both proteins bind phosphate-containing ligands). The striking similarity in the arrangement of the structural domains of the two proteins suggests that both may serve similar functions as signal transducers.     

Improving accuracy and efficiency of blind protein-ligand docking by focusing on predicted binding sites

The use of predicted binding sites (binding sites calculated from the protein structure alone) is evaluated here as a tool to focus the docking of small molecule ligands into protein structures, simulating cases where the real binding sites are unknown. The resulting approach consists of a few independent docking runs carried out on small boxes, centered on the predicted binding sites, as opposed to one larger blind docking run that covers the complete protein structure. The focused and blind approaches were compared using a set of 77 known protein-ligand complexes and 19 ligand-free structures. The focused approach is shown to: (1) identify the correct binding site more frequently than blind docking; (2) produce more accurate docking poses for the ligand; (3) require less computational time. Additionally, the results show that very few real binding sites are missed in spite of focusing on only three predicted binding sites per target protein. Overall the results indicate that, by improving the sampling in regions that are likely to correspond to binding sites, the focused docking approach increases accuracy and efficiency of protein ligand docking for those cases where the ligand-binding site is unknown. This is especially relevant in applications such as reverse virtual screening and structure-based functional annotation of proteins.     

Similarity-driven flexible ligand docking

A similarity-driven approach to flexible ligand docking is presented. Given a reference ligand or a pharmacophore positioned in the protein active site, the method allows inclusion of a similarity term during docking. Two different algorithms have been implemented, namely, a similarity-penalized docking (SP-DOCK) and a similarity-guided docking (SG-DOCK). The basic idea is to maximally exploit the structural information about the ligand binding mode present in cases where ligand-bound protein structures are available, information that is usually ignored in standard docking procedures. SP-DOCK and SG-DOCK have been derived as modified versions of the program DOCK 4.0, where the similarity program MIMIC acts as a module for the calculation of similarity indices that correct docking energy scores at certain steps of the calculation. SP-DOCK applies similarity corrections to the set of ligand orientations at the end of the ligand incremental construction process, penalizing the docking energy and, thus, having only an effect on the relative ordering of the final solutions. SG-DOCK applies similarity corrections throughout the entire ligand incremental construction process, thus affecting not only the relative ordering of solutions but also actively guiding the ligand docking. The performance of SP-DOCK and SG-DOCK for binding mode assessment and molecular database screening is discussed. When applied to a set of 32 thrombin ligands for which crystal structures are available, SG-DOCK improves the average RMSD by ca. 1 A when compared with DOCK. When those 32 thrombin ligands are included into a set of 1,000 diverse molecules from the ACD, DIV, and WDI databases, SP-DOCK significantly improves the retrieval of thrombin ligands within the first 10% of each of the three databases with respect to DOCK, with minimal additional computational cost. In all cases, comparison of SP-DOCK and SG-DOCK results with those obtained by DOCK and MIMIC is performed.     

Sequence Alignment Reveals Possible MAPK Docking Motifs on HIV Proteins

Over the course of HIV infection, virus replication is facilitated by the phosphorylation of HIV proteins by human ERK1 and ERK2 mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs). MAPKs are known to phosphorylate their substrates by first binding with them at a docking site. Docking site interactions could be viable drug targets because the sequences guiding them are more specific than phosphorylation consensus sites. In this study we use multiple bioinformatics tools to discover candidate MAPK docking site motifs on HIV proteins known to be phosphorylated by MAPKs, and we discuss the possibility of targeting docking sites with drugs. Using sequence alignments of HIV proteins of different subtypes, we show that MAPK docking patterns previously described for human proteins appear on the HIV matrix, Tat, and Vif proteins in a strain dependent manner, but are absent from HIV Rev and appear on all HIV Nef strains. We revise the regular expressions of previously annotated MAPK docking patterns in order to provide a subtype independent motif that annotates all HIV proteins. One revision is based on a documented human variant of one of the substrate docking motifs, and the other reduces the number of required basic amino acids in the standard docking motifs from two to one. The proposed patterns are shown to be consistent with in silico docking between ERK1 and the HIV matrix protein. The motif usage on HIV proteins is sufficiently different from human proteins in amino acid sequence similarity to allow for HIV specific targeting using small-molecule drugs.