Energy coupling in type II topoisomerases: why do they hydrolyze ATP?

Type II topoisomerases are essential enzymes in all cells. They help to solve the topological problems of DNA by passing one double helix through a transient break in another, in a reaction coupled to the hydrolysis of ATP. Members of one class of the enzymes, DNA gyrases, are configured to carry out an intramolecular reaction, removing positive supercoiling and introducing negative supercoiling into circular DNA using free energy derived from ATP hydrolysis. The nonsupercoiling class, including bacterial topoisomerase IV and eukaryotic topoisomerase II enzymes, can carry out both intra- and intermolecular reactions, and their primary role is the unlinking (decatenation) of daughter replicons before partition. In these enzymes, ATP hydrolysis is coupled to a reduction in DNA complexity (catenation, supercoiling, and knotting) below the level expected at equilibrium. This review discusses our current understanding of the mechanisms behind the coupling of the energy of ATP hydrolysis to topological changes catalyzed by both of these classes of enzyme.     

Structural dissection of ATP turnover in the prototypical GHL ATPase TopoVI

GHL proteins are functionally diverse enzymes defined by the presence of a conserved ATPase domain that self-associates to trap substrate upon nucleotide binding. The structural states adopted by these enzymes during nucleotide hydrolysis and product release, and their consequences for enzyme catalysis, have remained unclear. Here, we have determined a complete structural map of the ATP turnover cycle for topoVI-B, the ATPase subunit of the archaeal GHL enzyme topoisomerase VI. With this ensemble of structures, we show that significant conformational changes in the subunit occur first upon ATP binding, and subsequently upon release of hydrolyzed P(i). Together, these data provide a structural framework for understanding the role of ATP hydrolysis in the type II topoisomerase reaction. Our results also suggest that the GHL ATPase module is a molecular switch in which ATP hydrolysis serves as a prerequisite but not a driving force for substrate-dependent structural transitions in the enzyme.     

Kinetic characterization of the unisite catalytic pathway of seven beta-subunit mutant F1-ATPases from Escherichia coli

We have studied the kinetics of "unisite" ATP hydrolysis and synthesis in seven mutant Escherichia coli F1-ATPase enzymes. The seven mutations are distributed over a 105-residue segment of the catalytic nucleotide-binding domain in beta-subunit and are: G142S, K155Q, K155E, E181Q, E192Q, M209I, and R246C. We report forward and reverse rate constants and equilibrium constants in all seven mutant enzymes for the four steps of unisite kinetics, namely (i) ATP binding/release, (ii) ATP hydrolysis/synthesis, (iii) Pi release/binding, and (iv) ADP release/binding. The seven mutant enzymes displayed a wide range of deviations from normal in both rate and equilibrium constants, with no discernible common pattern. Notably, steep reductions in Kd ATP were seen in some cases, the value of Kd Pi was high, and K2 (ATP hydrolysis/synthesis) was relatively unaffected. Significantly, when the data from the seven mutations were combined with previous data from two other E. coli F1-beta-subunit mutations (D242N, D242V), normal E. coli F1, soluble and membranous mitochondrial F1, it was found that linear free energy relationships obtained for both ATP binding/release (log k+1 versus log K1) and ADP binding/release (log k-4 versus log K-4). Two conclusions follow. 1) The seven mutations studied here cause subtle changes in interactions between the catalytic nucleotide-binding domain and substrate ATP or product ADP. 2) The mitochondrial, normal E. coli, and nine total beta-subunit mutant enzymes represent a continuum in which subtle structural differences in the catalytic site resulted in changes in binding energy; therefore insights into the nature of energy coupling during ATP hydrolysis and synthesis by F1-ATPase may be ascertained by detailed studies of this group of enzymes.     

Resolving individual steps in the operation of ATP-dependent proteolytic molecular machines: from conformational changes to substrate translocation and processivity

Clp, Lon, and FtsH proteases are proteolytic molecular machines that use the free energy of ATP hydrolysis to unfold protein substrates and processively present them to protease active sites. Here we review recent biochemical and structural studies relevant to the mechanism of ATP-dependent processive proteolysis. Despite the significant structural differences among the Clp, Lon, and FtsH proteases, these enzymes share important mechanistic features. In these systems, mechanistic studies have provided evidence for ATP binding and hydrolysis-driven conformational changes that drive translocation of substrates, which has significant implications for the processive mechanism of proteolysis. These studies indicate that the nucleotide (ATP, ADP, or nonhydrolyzable ATP analogues) occupancy of the ATPase binding sites can influence the binding mode and/or binding affinity for protein substrates. A general mechanism is proposed in which the communication between ATPase active sites and protein substrate binding regions coordinates a processive cycle of substrate binding, translocation, proteolysis, and product release.     

Multidrug resistance ABC transporters

Clinical multidrug resistance is caused by a group of integral membrane proteins that transport hydrophobic drugs and lipids across the cell membrane. One class of these permeases, known as multidrug resistance ATP binding cassette (ABC) transporters, translocate these molecules by coupling drug/lipid efflux with energy derived from the hydrolysis of ATP. In this review, we examine both the structures and conformational changes of multidrug resistance ABC transporters. Together with the available biochemical and structural evidence, we propose a general mechanism for hydrophobic substrate transport coupled to ATP hydrolysis.     

Coupling DNA-binding and ATP hydrolysis in Escherichia coli RecQ: role of a highly conserved aromatic-rich sequence

RecQ enzymes are broadly conserved Superfamily-2 (SF-2) DNA helicases that play critical roles in DNA metabolism. RecQ proteins use the energy of ATP hydrolysis to drive DNA unwinding; however, the mechanisms by which RecQ links ATPase activity to DNA-binding/unwinding are unknown. In many Superfamily-1 (SF-1) DNA helicases, helicase sequence motif III links these activities by binding both single-stranded (ss) DNA and ATP. However, the ssDNA-binding aromatic-rich element in motif III present in these enzymes is missing from SF-2 helicases, raising the question of how these enzymes link ATP hydrolysis to DNA-binding/unwinding. We show that Escherichia coli RecQ contains a conserved aromatic-rich loop in its helicase domain between motifs II and III. Although placement of the RecQ aromatic-rich loop is topologically distinct relative to the SF-1 enzymes, both loops map to similar tertiary structural positions. We examined the functions of the E.coli RecQ aromatic-rich loop using RecQ variants with single amino acid substitutions within the segment. Our results indicate that the aromatic-rich loop in RecQ is critical for coupling ATPase and DNA-binding/unwinding activities. Our studies also suggest that RecQ's aromatic-rich loop might couple ATP hydrolysis to DNA-binding in a mechanistically distinct manner from SF-1 helicases.     

Proton-powered subunit rotation in single membrane-bound F0F1-ATP synthase

Synthesis of ATP from ADP and phosphate, catalyzed by F(0)F(1)-ATP synthases, is the most abundant physiological reaction in almost any cell. F(0)F(1)-ATP synthases are membrane-bound enzymes that use the energy derived from an electrochemical proton gradient for ATP formation. We incorporated double-labeled F(0)F(1)-ATP synthases from Escherichia coli into liposomes and measured single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) during ATP synthesis and hydrolysis. The gamma subunit rotates stepwise during proton transport-powered ATP synthesis, showing three distinct distances to the b subunits in repeating sequences. The average durations of these steps correspond to catalytic turnover times upon ATP synthesis as well as ATP hydrolysis. The direction of rotation during ATP synthesis is opposite to that of ATP hydrolysis.     

Electrostatic interactions in catalytic centers of F1-ATPase

The first part of this paper is a brief review of works concerned with the mechanisms of functioning of F0F1-ATP synthases. F0F1-ATP syntheses operate as rotating molecular machines that provide the synthesis of ATP from ADP and inorganic phosphate (Pi) in mitochondria, chloroplasts, and bacteria at the expense of the energy of electrochemical gradient of hydrogen ions generated across energy-transducing mitochondrial, chloroplast or, bacterial membranes. A distinguishing feature of these enzymes is that they operate as rotary molecular motors. In the second part of the work, we calculated the contribution of electrostatic interactions between charged groups of a substrate (MgATP), reaction products (MgADP and Pi), and charged amino acid residues of the F1-ATPase molecule to energy changes associated with the binding of ATP and its chemical transformations in the catalytic centers located at the interface of the alpha- and beta-subunits of the enzyme (oligomer complex alpha 3 beta 3 gamma of bovine mitochondrial ATPase). The catalytic cycle of ATP hydrolysis considered in the work includes conformational changes of alpha- and beta-subunits caused by unidirectional rotations of the central gamma-subunit. The results of our calculations are consistent with the idea that the energetically favorable process of ATP binding to the "open" catalytic center of F1-ATPase initiates the rotation of the gamma-subunit followed by ATP hydrolysis in another ("closed") catalytic center of the enzyme.     

Energy Coupling Efficiency in the Type I ABC Transporter GlnPQ

Solute transport via ATP binding cassette (ABC) importers involves receptor-mediated substrate binding, which is followed by ATP-driven translocation of the substrate across the membrane. How these steps are exactly initiated and coupled, and how much ATP it takes to complete a full transport cycle, are subject of debate. Here, we reconstitute the ABC importer GlnPQ in nanodiscs and in proteoliposomes and determine substrate-(in)dependent ATP hydrolysis and transmembrane transport. We determined the conformational states of the substrate-binding domains (SBDs) by single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer measurements. We find that the basal ATPase activity (ATP hydrolysis in the absence of substrate) is mainly caused by the docking of the closed-unliganded state of the SBDs onto the transporter domain of GlnPQ and that, unlike glutamine, arginine binds both SBDs but does not trigger their closing. Furthermore, comparison of the ATPase activity in nanodiscs with glutamine transport in proteoliposomes shows that the stoichiometry of ATP per substrate is close to two. These findings help understand the mechanism of transport and the energy coupling efficiency in ABC transporters with covalently linked SBDs, which may aid our understanding of Type I ABC importers in general.     

ATP binding and ATP hydrolysis play distinct roles in the function of 26S proteasome

The 26S proteasome degrades polyubiquitinated proteins by an energy-dependent mechanism. Here we define multiple roles for ATP in 26S proteasome function. ATP binding is necessary and sufficient for assembly of 26S proteasome from 20S proteasome and PA700/19S subcomplexes and for proteasome activation. Proteasome assembly and activation may require distinct ATP binding events. The 26S proteasome degrades nonubiquitylated, unstructured proteins without ATP hydrolysis, indicating that substrate translocation per se does not require the energy of hydrolysis. Nonubiquitylated folded proteins and certain polyubiquitylated folded proteins were refractory to proteolysis. The latter were deubiquitylated by an ATP-independent mechanism. Other folded as well as unstructured polyubiquitylated proteins required ATP hydrolysis for proteolysis and deubiquitylation. Thus, ATP hydrolysis is not used solely for substrate unfolding. These results indicate that 26S proteasome-catalyzed degradation of polyubiquitylated proteins involves mechanistic coupling of several processes and that such coupling imposes an energy requirement not apparent for any isolated process.     

Inhibition of energy-transducing reactions by 8-nitreno-ATP covalently bound to bovine heart submitochondrial particles: direct interaction between ATPase and redox enzymes

The photoaffinity label 8-azido-ATP has been used to study the effect of inhibition of ATP synthase on ATP-driven reverse electron transfer from succinate to NAD+ ('reversal'), succinate- and NADH-driven ATP synthesis and ATP-Pi exchange. In reversal, where ATPase functions as primary proton pump, inactivation by covalently bound nitreno-ATP results in an inhibition that is proportional to the inactivation of ATP hydrolysis, or, consequently, with the concentration of inactivated ATP synthases. Up to 60% inactivation of the reversal rate does not lead to a decrease in delta mu H+. Inhibition of ATP synthase as secondary proton pump results in case of NADH-driven ATP synthesis in a proportional inhibition, but with succinate as substrate ATP synthesis is less than proportionally inhibited, compared with inactivation of ATP hydrolysis. Inhibition of one of the primary pumps of NADH-driven ATP synthesis, the NADH:Q oxidoreductase, with rotenone also resulted in an inhibition of the rate of ATP synthesis proportional to that of the NADH oxidation. ATP-Pi exchange is much more affected than ATP hydrolysis by photoinactivation with 8-azido-ATP. Contrary to reversal and NADH-driven ATP synthesis the rate of ATP-Pi exchange does not depend linearly, but quadratically on the concentration of active ATP synthases. The observed proportional relationships between inhibition of the primary or secondary pump and the inhibition of the overall energy-transfer reactions do not support the existence of a pool intermediate in energy-transduction reactions. However, the results are consistent with a direct transfer of energy from redox enzymes to ATP synthase and vice versa.     

SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling requires changes in DNA topology

ySWI/SNF complex belongs to a family of enzymes that use the energy of ATP hydrolysis to remodel chromatin structure. Here we examine the role of DNA topology in the mechanism of ySWI/SNF remodeling. We find that the ability of ySWI/SNF to enhance accessibility of nucleosomal DNA is nearly eliminated when DNA topology is constrained in small circular nucleosomal arrays and that this inhibition can be alleviated by topoisomerases. Furthermore, we demonstrate that remodeling of these substrates does not require dramatic histone octamer movements or displacement. Our results suggest a model in which ySWI/SNF remodels nucleosomes by using the energy of ATP hydrolysis to drive local changes in DNA twist.     

C-terminal domain mutations in ClpX uncouple substrate binding from an engagement step required for unfolding

ClpX mediates ATP-dependent denaturation of specific target proteins and disassembly of protein complexes. Like other AAA + family members, ClpX contains an alphabeta ATPase domain and an alpha-helical C-terminal domain. ClpX proteins with mutations in the C-terminal domain were constructed and screened for disassembly activity in vivo. Seven mutant enzymes with defective phenotypes were purified and characterized. Three of these proteins (L381K, D382K and Y385A) had low activity in disassembly or unfolding assays in vitro. In contrast to wild-type ClpX, substrate binding to these mutants inhibited ATP hydrolysis instead of increasing it. These mutants appear to be defective in a reaction step that engages bound substrate proteins and is required both for enhancement of ATP hydrolysis and for unfolding/disassembly. Some of these side chains form part of the interface between the C-terminal domain of one ClpX subunit and the ATPase domain of an adjacent subunit in the hexamer and appear to be required for communication between adjacent nucleotide binding sites.     

Modulation of the Kinesin ATPase Cycle by Neck Linker Docking and Microtubule Binding

Kinesin motor proteins use an ATP hydrolysis cycle to perform various functions in eukaryotic cells. Many questions remain about how the kinesin mechanochemical ATPase cycle is fine-tuned for specific work outputs. In this study, we use isothermal titration calorimetry and stopped-flow fluorometry to determine and analyze the thermodynamics of the human kinesin-5 (Eg5/KSP) ATPase cycle. In the absence of microtubules, the binding interactions of kinesin-5 with both ADP product and ATP substrate involve significant enthalpic gains coupled to smaller entropic penalties. However, when the wild-type enzyme is titrated with a non-hydrolyzable ATP analog or the enzyme is mutated such that it is able to bind but not hydrolyze ATP, substrate binding is 10-fold weaker than ADP binding because of a greater entropic penalty due to the structural rearrangements of switch 1, switch 2, and loop L5 on ATP binding. We propose that these rearrangements are reversed upon ATP hydrolysis and phosphate release. In addition, experiments on a truncated kinesin-5 construct reveal that upon nucleotide binding, both the N-terminal cover strand and the neck linker interact to modulate kinesin-5 nucleotide affinity. Moreover, interactions with microtubules significantly weaken the affinity of kinesin-5 for ADP without altering the affinity of the enzyme for ATP in the absence of ATP hydrolysis. Together, these results define the energy landscape of a kinesin ATPase cycle in the absence and presence of microtubules and shed light on the role of molecular motor mechanochemistry in cellular microtubule dynamics.     

Soluble NTPDase: An additional system of nucleotide hydrolysis in rat blood serum

The participation of a nucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase in the nucleotide hydrolysis by rat blood serum was evaluated. Nucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase and phosphodiesterase are enzymes possibly involved in ATP and ADP hydrolysis. The specific activity of the phosphodiesterase activity (using thymidine 5'-monophosphate p-nitrophenyl ester as substrate) was 4.92 +/- 0.73 (mean +/- SD, n = 10) nmol p-nitrophenol.min(-1).mg(-1) protein and the specific activities for ATP and ADP were 1.31 +/- 0.37 (mean +/- SD, n = 7) and 1.36 +/- 0.25 (mean +/- SD, n = 5) nmol Pi.min(-1).mg(-1) protein, respectively. A competition plot demonstrated that ATP and ADP hydrolysis occurs at the same active site. The effect of suramin and phenylalanine on ATP, ADP and thymidine 5'-monophosphate p-nitrophenyl ester hydrolysis was investigated. The results were opposite considering the hydrolysis of ATP and ADP and that of the substrate marker for the enzyme phosphodiesterase. These results are indicative of the presence of, at least, two enzymes participating in the serum nucleotide hydrolysis. The presence of cAMP did not affect the hydrolysis velocity of ATP and ADP, while thymidine 5'-monophosphate p-nitrophenyl ester hydrolysis was inhibited by cAMP by approximately 47%, suggesting that the hydrolysis of the ATP and ADP, under our assay conditions, occurs at a different site from the phosphodiesterase site. Both enzyme activities, in the rat blood serum, may be involved in the modulation of the nucleotide/nucleoside ratio in the circulation, serving an in vivo homeostatic and antithrombotic function. In addition, the phosphodiesterase may act on DNA or RNA liberated upon tissue injury and/or cell death.     

ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling: going mobile

Members of the ATP-dependent class of chromatin remodeling enzymes are found in all eukaryotes where they play key roles in many DNA-mediated processes. Each of these enzymes are multi-subunit assembles that hydrolyze approximately 1000 ATP/min. The energy of ATP hydrolysis is used to disrupt the chromatin structure which can be scored by enhanced factor binding, disruption of the DNase I cleavage pattern of mononucleosomes, formation of dinucleosomes, movements of histone octamers in cis and in trans, and by generation of nuclease hypersensitive sites. Here the biochemical properties of these enzymes are reviewed and the manner in which ATP-driven nucleosome movements might account for many of these diverse activities is discussed.     

Kinesin and myosin ATPases: variations on a theme.

The enzymes kinesin and myosin are examples of molecular motors which couple ATP hydrolysis to directed movement of biological structures. Myosin has been extensively studied and its structure and mechanism of coupling are known in detail. Much less is known about kinesin, but many of its major properties are similar to those of myosin. Both enzymes have two catalytic head groups at the end of a long alpha-helical rod. The head groups contain the sites for ATP hydrolysis and interaction with their respective partners for movement (microtubules or F-actin). In each case the binding and hydrolysis of ATP is rapid and the steady state ATPase rate is limited by a slow step in the region of product release. This slow release of product is accelerated by interaction with actin or microtubules coupled to changes in binding affinity. As there is no evidence for a close evolutionary link between kinesin and myosin, these and other similarities may represent convergence to set of common functional properties which are constrained by the requirements of protein structure and the use of ATP hydrolysis as a source of energy. It will be of particular interest to determine if these common properties are also shared by the large number of divergent proteins which have recently been discovered to possess a domain which is homologous to the head group of kinesin.     

Induced fit in arginine kinase

Creatine kinase (CK) and arginine kinase (AK) are related enzymes that reversibly transfer a phosphoryl group between a guanidino compound and ADP. In the buffering of ATP energy levels, they are central to energy metabolism and have been paradigms of classical enzymology. Comparison of the open substrate-free structure of CK and the closed substrate-bound structure of AK reveals differences that are consistent with prior biophysical evidence of substrate-induced conformational changes. Large and small domains undergo a hinged 13 degrees rotation. Several loops become ordered and adopt different positions in the presence of substrate, including one (residues 309-319) that moves 15 A to fold over the substrates. The conformational changes appear to be necessary in aligning the two substrates for catalysis, in configuring the active site only when productive phosphoryl transfer is possible, and excluding water from the active site to avoid wasteful ATP hydrolysis.     

Molecular Basis of Purinergic Signal Metabolism by Ectonucleotide Pyrophosphatase/Phosphodiesterases 4 and 1 and Implications in Stroke

NPP4 is a type I extracellular membrane protein on brain vascular endothelium inducing platelet aggregation via the hydrolysis of Ap3A, whereas NPP1 is a type II extracellular membrane protein principally present on the surface of chondrocytes that regulates tissue mineralization. To understand the metabolism of purinergic signals resulting in the physiologic activities of the two enzymes, we report the high resolution crystal structure of human NPP4 and explore the molecular basis of its substrate specificity with NPP1. Both enzymes cleave Ap3A, but only NPP1 can hydrolyze ATP. Comparative structural analysis reveals a tripartite lysine claw in NPP1 that stabilizes the terminal phosphate of ATP, whereas the corresponding region of NPP4 contains features that hinder this binding orientation, thereby inhibiting ATP hydrolysis. Furthermore, we show that NPP1 is unable to induce platelet aggregation at physiologic concentrations reported in human blood, but it could stimulate platelet aggregation if localized at low nanomolar concentrations on vascular endothelium. The combined studies expand our understanding of NPP1 and NPP4 substrate specificity and range and provide a rational mechanism by which polymorphisms in NPP1 confer stroke resistance.