Positioning proton-donating residues to the Schiff-base accelerates the M-decay of pharaonis phoborhodopsin expressed in Escherichia coli.

Phoborhodopsin (also called sensory rhodopsin II, sR-II) is a receptor for the negative phototaxis of Halobacterium salinarum (pR), and pharaonis phoborhodopsin (ppR) is the corresponding receptor of Natronobacterium pharaonis. pR and ppR are retinoid proteins and have a photocycle similar to that of bacteriorhodopsin (bR). A major difference between the photocycle of the ion pump bR and the sensor pR or ppR is found in their turnover rates which are much faster for bR. A reason for this difference might be found in the lack of a proton-donating residue to the Schiff base which is formed between the lysine of the opsin and retinal. To reconstruct a bR-like photochemical behavior, we expressed ppR mutants in Escherichia coli in which proton-donating groups have been reintroduced into the cytoplasmic proton channel. In measurement of the photocycle it could be shown that the F86D mutant of ppR (Phe86 was substituted by Asp) showed a faster decay of M-intermediate than the wild-type, which was even accelerated in the F86D/L40T double mutant.     

Proton release and uptake of pharaonis phoborhodopsin (sensory rhodopsin II) reconstituted into phospholipids

pharaonis phoborhodopsin (ppR, also called pharaonis sensory rhodopsin II, psRII) is a photo-receptor for negative phototaxis in Natronobacterium pharaonis. During the photoreaction cycle (photocycle), ppR exhibits intraprotein proton movements, resulting in proton pumping from the cytoplasmic to the extracellular side, although it is weak. In this study, light-induced proton uptake and release of ppR reconstituted with phospholipid were analyzed using a SnO(2) electrode. The reconstituted ppR exhibited properties in proton uptake and release that are different from those of dodecyl maltoside solubilized samples. It showed fast proton release before the decay of ppR(M) (M-photointermediate) followed by proton uptake, which was similar to that of bacteriorhodopsin (BR), a light-driven proton pump. Mutant analysis assigned Asp193 to one (major) of the members of the proton-releasing group (PRG). Fast proton release was observed only when the pH was approximately 5-8 in the presence of Cl(-). When Cl(-) was replaced with SO(4)(2-), the reconstituted ppR did not exhibit fast proton release at any pH, suggesting Cl(-) binding around PRG. PRG in BR consists of Glu204 (Asp193 in ppR) and Glu194 (Pro183 in ppR). Replacement of Pro183 by Glu/Asp, a negatively charged residue, led to Cl(-)-independent fast proton release. The transducer binding affected the properties of PRG in ppR in the ground state and in the ppR(M) state, suggesting that interaction with the transducer extends to the extracellular surface of ppR. Differences and similarities in the molecular mechanism of the proton movement between ppR and BR are discussed.     

Vibrational modes of the protonated Schiff base in pharaonis phoborhodopsin

pharaonis phoborhodopsin (ppR; also called pharaonis sensory rhodopsin II, psR-II) is a photoreceptor for negative phototaxis in Natronobacterium pharaonis. Recent X-ray crystallographic structures showed that ppR and bacteriorhodopsin (BR), a light-driven proton pump, possess similar molecular environments of the retinal Schiff base. Nevertheless, absorption spectra are different by 70 nm between ppR and BR, suggesting the different chromophore-protein interactions involving the Schiff base region. In this article, we identify frequencies of the Schiff base vibrations in the ppR(K) minus ppR difference spectra by means of low-temperature FTIR spectroscopy of [zeta-(15)N]lysine-labeled ppR. The N-D stretch in D(2)O was found at 2140 and 2091 cm(-1) for ppR, which are shifted to a lower frequency by 32-33 cm(-1) compared to those for BR. This observation indicates the stronger hydrogen bond of the Schiff base in ppR than in BR. The N-D stretch of the Schiff base and O-D stretch of water molecules are located at the different frequencies in ppR, while they appear in the same frequency region in BR [Kandori, H., Belenky, M., and Herzfeld, J. (2002) Biochemistry 41, 6026-6031]. These differences could be correlated with the distorted pentagonal cluster structure in ppR. In contrast, the N-D stretch of ppR(K) was found at 2474 cm(-1), which is close in frequency to that of BR(K). The O-D stretch of Thr79 was also assigned at 2512 and 2474 cm(-1) for ppR and ppR(K), respectively. These frequencies are close to those of BR, suggesting the interaction of Thr79 and Asp75 in ppR is similar to that of Thr89 and Asp85 in BR.     

FTIR spectroscopy of the M photointermediate in pharaonis rhoborhodopsin

pharaonis phoborhodopsin (ppR; also called pharaonis sensory rhodopsin II, psR-II) is a photoreceptor for negative phototaxis in Natronobacterium pharaonis. During the photocycle of ppR, the Schiff base of the retinal chromophore is deprotonated upon formation of the M intermediate (ppR(M)). The present FTIR spectroscopy of ppR(M) revealed that the Schiff base proton is transferred to Asp-75, which corresponds to Asp-85 in a light-driven proton-pump bacteriorhodopsin (BR). In addition, the C==O stretching vibrations of Asn-105 were assigned for ppR and ppR(M). The common hydrogen-bonding alterations in Asn-105 of ppR and Asp-115 of BR were found in the process from photoisomerization (K intermediate) to the primary proton transfer (M intermediate). These results implicate similar protein structural changes between ppR and BR. However, BR(M) decays to BR(N) accompanying a proton transfer from Asp-96 to the Schiff base and largely changed protein structure. In the D96N mutant protein of BR that lacks a proton donor to the Schiff base, the N-like protein structure was observed with the deprotonated Schiff base (called M(N)) at alkaline pH. In ppR, such an N-like (M(N)-like) structure was not observed at alkaline pH, suggesting that the protein structure of the M state activates its transducer protein.     

Internal water molecules of pharaonis phoborhodopsin studied by low-temperature infrared spectroscopy.

In the Schiff base region of bacteriorhodopsin (BR), a light-driven proton-pump protein, three internal water molecules are involved in a pentagonal cluster structure. These water molecules constitute a hydrogen-bonding network consisting of two positively charged groups, the Schiff base and Arg82, and two negatively charged groups, Asp85 and Asp212. Previous infrared spectroscopy of BR revealed stretching vibrations of such water molecules under strong hydrogen-bonding conditions using spectral differences in D2O and D2(18O) [Kandori and Shichida (2000) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122, 11745-11746]. The present study extends the infrared analysis to another archaeal rhodopsin, pharaonis phoborhodopsin (ppR; also called pharaonis sensory rhodopsin-II, psR-II), involved in the negative phototaxis of Natronobacterium pharaonis. Despite functional differences between ppR and BR, similar spectral features of water bands were observed before and after photoisomerization of the retinal chromophore at 77 K. This implies that the structure and the structural changes of internal water molecules are similar between ppR and BR. Higher stretching frequencies of the bridged water in ppR suggest that the water-containing pentagonal cluster structure is considerably distorted in ppR. These observations are consistent with the crystallographic structures of ppR and BR. The water structure and structural changes upon photoisomerization of ppR are discussed here on the basis of their infrared spectra.     

Probing the proton channel and the retinal binding site of Natronobacterium pharaonis sensory rhodopsin II

The sensory rhodopsin II from Natronobacterium pharaonis (NpSRII) was mutated to try to create functional properties characteristic of bacteriorhodopsin (BR), the proton pump from Halobacterium salinarum. Key residues from the cytoplasmic and extracellular proton transfer channel of BR as well as from the retinal binding site were chosen. The single site mutants L40T, F86D, P183E, and T204A did not display altered function as determined by the kinetics of their photocycles. However, the photocycle of each of the subsequent multisite mutations L40T/F86D, L40T/F86D/P183E, and L40T/F86D/P183E/T204A was quite different from that of the wild-type protein. The reprotonation of the Schiff base could be accelerated approximately 300- to 400-fold, to approximately two to three times faster than the corresponding reaction in BR. The greatest effect is observed for the quadruple mutant in which Thr-204 is replaced by Ala. This result indicates that mutations affecting conformational changes of the protein might be of decisive importance for the creation of BR-like functional properties.     

Interaction of Asn105 with the retinal chromophore during photoisomerization of pharaonis phoborhodopsin

pharaonis phoborhodopsin (ppR; also called pharaonis sensory rhodopsin II, psR-II) is a photoreceptor for negative phototaxis in Natronobacterium pharaonis. ppR has a blue-shifted absorption spectrum with a spectral shoulder, which is highly unique for the archaeal rhodopsin family. The primary reaction of ppR is a cis-trans photoisomerization of the retinal chromophore to form the K intermediate, like the well-studied proton pump bacteriorhodopsin (BR). Recent comparative FTIR spectroscopy of the K states in ppR and BR revealed that more extended structural changes take place in ppR than in BR with respect to chromophore distortion and protein structural changes [Kandori, H., Shimono, K., Sudo, Y., Iwamoto, M., Shichida, Y., and Kamo, N. (2001) Biochemistry 40, 9238-9246]. FTIR spectroscopy of the N105D mutant protein reported here assigns the vibrational bands at 1704 and 1700 cm(-1) as C=O stretches of Asn105 in ppR and ppR(K), respectively. A comparative investigation between ppR and BR further reveals that the structure at position 105 in ppR is similar to that of the corresponding position (Asp115) in BR; this observation is supported by the recent X-ray crystallographic structures of ppR [Luecke, H., Schobert, B., Lanyi, J. K., Spudich, E. N., and Spudich, J. L. (2001) Science 293, 1499-1503; Royant, A., Nollert, P., Edman, K., Neutze, R., Landau, E. M., Pebay-Peyroulla, E., and Navarro, J. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 10131-10136]. Nevertheless, structural changes upon photoisomerization at position 105 in ppR are greater than those at position 115 in BR. As a consequence of a unique chromophore-protein interaction in ppR, extended protein structural changes accompanying retinal photoisomerization occur, and these include Asn105 which is approximately 7 A from the retinal chromophore.     

Role of Asp193 in chromophore-protein interaction of pharaonis phoborhodopsin (sensory rhodopsin II)

Pharaonis phoborhodopsin (ppR; also pharaonis sensory rhodopsin II, psRII) is a receptor of the negative phototaxis of Natronobacterium pharaonis. By spectroscopic titration of D193N and D193E mutants, the pK(a) of the Schiff base was evaluated. Asp193 corresponds to Glu204 of bacteriorhodopsin (bR). The pK(a) of the Schiff base (SBH(+)) of D193N was approximately 10.1-10.0 (at XH(+)) and approximately 11.4-11.6 (at X) depending on the protonation state of a certain residue (designated by X) and independent of Cl(-), whereas those of the wild type and D193E were >12. The pK(a) values of XH(+) were approximately 11.8-11.2 at the state of SB, 10.5 at SBH(+) state in the presence of Cl(-), and 9.6 at SBH(+) without Cl(-). These imply the presence of a long-range interaction in the extracellular channel. Asp193 was suggested to be deprotonated in the present dodecyl-maltoside (DDM) solubilized wild-type ppR, which is contrary to Glu204 of bR. In the absence of salts, the irreversible denaturation of D193N (but not the wild type and D193E) occurred via a metastable state, into which the addition of Cl(-) reversed the intact pigment. This suggests that the negative charge at residue 193, which can be substituted by Cl(-), is necessary to maintain the proper conformation in the DDM-solubilized ppR.     

Structural changes of pharaonis phoborhodopsin upon photoisomerization of the retinal chromophore: infrared spectral comparison with bacteriorhodopsin

Archaeal rhodopsins possess a retinal molecule as their chromophores, and their light energy and light signal conversions are triggered by all-trans to 13-cis isomerization of the retinal chromophore. Relaxation through structural changes of the protein then leads to functional processes, proton pump in bacteriorhodopsin and transducer activation in sensory rhodopsins. In the present paper, low-temperature Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy is applied to phoborhodopsin from Natronobacterium pharaonis (ppR), a photoreceptor for the negative phototaxis of the bacteria, and infrared spectral changes before and after photoisomerization are compared with those of bacteriorhodopsin (BR) at 77 K. Spectral comparison of the C--C stretching vibrations of the retinal chromophore shows that chromophore conformation of the polyene chain is similar between ppR and BR. This fact implies that the unique chromophore-protein interaction in ppR, such as the blue-shifted absorption spectrum with vibrational fine structure, originates from both ends, the beta-ionone ring and the Schiff base regions. In fact, less planer ring structure and stronger hydrogen bond of the Schiff base were suggested for ppR. Similar frequency changes upon photoisomerization are observed for the C==N stretch of the retinal Schiff base and the stretch of the neighboring threonine side chain (Thr79 in ppR and Thr89 in BR), suggesting that photoisomerization in ppR is driven by the motion of the Schiff base like BR. Nevertheless, the structure of the K state after photoisomerization is different between ppR and BR. In BR, chromophore distortion is localized in the Schiff base region, as shown in its hydrogen out-of-plane vibrations. In contrast, more extended structural changes take place in ppR in view of chromophore distortion and protein structural changes. Such structure of the K intermediate of ppR is probably correlated with its high thermal stability. In fact, almost identical infrared spectra are obtained between 77 and 170 K in ppR. Unique chromophore-protein interaction and photoisomerization processes in ppR are discussed on the basis of the present infrared spectral comparison with BR.     

A pharaonis phoborhodopsin mutant with the same retinal binding site residues as in bacteriorhodopsin

pharaonis phoborhodopsin (ppR, also called pharaonis sensory rhodopsin II, psR-II) is a photoreceptor for negative phototaxis in Natronobacterium pharaonis. ppR has a blue-shifted absorption maximum (500 nm) relative those of other archaeal rhodopsins such as the proton-pump bacteriorhodopsin (BR; 570 nm). Among the 25 amino acids that are within 5 A of the retinal chromophore, 10 are different in BR and ppR, and they are presumed to be crucial in determining the color of their chromophores. However, the spectral red shift in a multiple mutant of ppR, in which the retinal binding site was made similar to that of BR (BR/ppR), was smaller than 40% (lambda(max) = 524 nm) than expected. In the paper presented here, we report on low-temperature Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy of BR/ppR, and compare the infrared spectral changes before and after photoisomerization with those for ppR and BR. The C[bond]C stretch and hydrogen out-of-plane (HOOP) vibrations of BR/ppR were similar to those of BR, suggesting that the surrounding protein moiety of BR/ppR becomes like BR. However, BR/ppR exhibited a unique IR band regarding the hydrogen bond of the protonated Schiff base. It has been known that ppR has a stronger hydrogen bond for the Schiff base than BR as judged from the frequency difference between their C[double bond]NH and C[double bond]ND stretches. We now find that replacement of the 10 amino acids of BR with ppR (BR/ppR) does not weaken the hydrogen bond of the Schiff base. Rather, the hydrogen bond in BR/ppR is stronger than that in the native ppR. We conclude that the principal factor of the smaller than expected opsin shift in BR/ppR is the strong association of the Schiff base with the surrounding counterion complex.     

Structural basis of diversification of fungal retinal proteins probed by site-directed mutagenesis of Leptosphaeria rhodopsin

Numerous fungal genomes encode homologs of bacteriorhodopsin (BR), but only two fungal rhodopsins were overexpressed and characterized spectroscopically. Neurospora rhodopsin (NR) is a slow-cycling sensory rhodopsin-like protein, while Leptosphaeria rhodopsin (LR) is a BR-like proton pump. Recently, we found that a conservative replacement of the cytoplasmic proton donor Asp150 by Glu converts LR into an NR-like protein. In this work, we search for structural reasons for the dramatic differences in their photochemistry by mutating the hydrogen-bonding partner of Asp150 (Thr87) and three additional residues (Thr233, Asp248, and Gly271) selected by comparison of the primary structures of NR and LR. We conclude that while these residues may contribute to the differences between LR and NR, they are not crucial for the optimization of the Schiff base reprotonation by Asp150, and that the dramatic effect of the D150E mutation is not a simple result of the introduction of a bulkier glutamate sidechain.     

FTIR spectroscopy of the O photointermediate in pharaonis phoborhodopsin

pharaonis phoborhodopsin (ppR; also called pharaonis sensory rhodopsin II, psR-II) is a photoreceptor protein for negative phototaxis in Natronobacterium pharaonis. During the photocycle of ppR, the retinal chromophore is thermally isomerized from the 13-cis to all-trans form. We employed FTIR spectroscopy of ppR at 260 K and pH 5 to reveal that this isomerization occurs upon formation of the O intermediate (ppR(O)) by using ppR samples reconstituted with 12,14-D(2)-labeled retinal. In ppR(O), C=O stretching vibrations of protonated carboxylates newly appear at 1757 (+)/1722 (-) cm(-1) in H(2)O and at 1747 (+)/1718 (-) cm(-1) in D(2)O in addition to the 1765 (+) cm(-1) band of Asp75. Amide I vibrations are basically similar between ppR(M) and ppR(O), whereas unique bands of ppR(O) are also observed such as the negative 1656 cm(-1) band in D(2)O and intense bands at 1686 (-)/1674 (+) cm(-1). In addition, O-D stretching vibrations of water molecules in the entire mid-infrared region are assigned for ppR(M) and ppR(O), the latter being unique for ppR, since it can be detected at low temperature (260 K). The ppR(M) minus ppR difference spectra lack the lowest frequency water band (2215 cm(-1)) observed in the ppR(K) minus ppR spectra, which is probably associated with water that interacts with the negative charges in the Schiff base region. It is likely that the proton transfer from the Schiff base to Asp75 in ppR(M) can be explained by a hydration switch of a water from Asp75 to Asp201, as was proposed for the light-driven proton-pump bacteriorhodopsin (hydration switch model) [Tanimoto, T., Furutani, Y., and Kandori, H. (2003) Biochemistry 42, 2300-2306]. In the transition from ppR(M) to ppR(O), a hydrogen-bonding alteration takes place for another water molecule that forms a strong hydrogen bond.     

FTIR analysis of the SII540 intermediate of sensory rhodopsin II: Asp73 is the Schiff base proton acceptor

Sensory rhodopsin II (SRII), a repellent phototaxis receptor found in Halobacterium salinarum, has several homologous residues which have been found to be important for the proper functioning of bacteriorhodopsin (BR), a light-driven proton pump. These include Asp73, which in the case of bacteriorhodopsin (Asp85) functions as the Schiff base counterion and proton acceptor. We analyzed the photocycles of both wild-type SRII and the mutant D73E, both reconstituted in Halobacterium salinarum lipids, using FTIR difference spectroscopy under conditions that favor accumulation of the O-like, photocycle intermediate, SII540. At both room temperature and -20 degrees C, the difference spectrum of SRII is similar to the BR-->O640 difference spectrum of BR, especially in the configurationally sensitive retinal fingerprint region. This indicates that SII540 has an all-trans chromophore similar to the O640 intermediate in BR. A positive band at 1761 cm-1 downshifts 40 cm-1 in the mutant D73E, confirming that Asp73 undergoes a protonation reaction and functions in analogy to Asp85 in BR as a Schiff base proton acceptor. Several other bands in the C=O stretching regions are identified which reflect protonation or hydrogen bonding changes of additional Asp and/or Glu residues. Intense bands in the amide I region indicate that a protein conformational change occurs in the late SRII photocycle which may be similar to the conformational changes that occur in the late BR photocycle. However, unlike BR, this conformational change does not reverse during formation of the O-like intermediate, and the peptide groups giving rise to these bands are partially accessible for hydrogen/deuterium exchange. Implications of these findings for the mechanism of SRII signal transduction are discussed.     

Importance of the broad regional interaction for spectral tuning in Natronobacterium pharaonis phoborhodopsin (sensory rhodopsin II)

Natronobacterium pharaonis phoborhodopsin (ppR; also called N. pharaonis sensory rhodopsin II, NpsRII) is a photophobic sensor in N. pharaonis, and has a shorter absorption maximum (lambdamax, 500 nm) than those of other archaeal retinal proteins (lambdamax, 560-590 nm) such as bacteriorhodopsin (bR). We constructed chimeric proteins between bR and ppR to investigate the long range interactions effecting the color regulation among archaeal retinal proteins. The lambdamax of B-DEFG/P-ABC was 545 nm, similar to that of bR expressed in Escherichia coli (lambdamax, 550 nm). B-DEFG/P-ABC means a chimera composed of helices D, E, F, and G of bR and helices A, B, and C of ppR. This indicates that the major factor(s) determining the difference in lambdamax between bR and ppR exist in helices DEFG. To specify the more minute regions for the color determination between bR and ppR, we constructed 15 chimeric proteins containing helices D, E, F, and G of bR. According to the absorption spectra of the various chimeric proteins, the interaction between helices D and E as well as the effect of the hydroxyl group around protonated Schiff base on helix G (Thr-204 for ppR and Ala-215 for bR) are the main factors for spectral tuning between bR and ppR.     

FTIR spectroscopy of the K photointermediate of Neurospora rhodopsin: structural changes of the retinal, protein, and water molecules after photoisomerization

Neurospora rhodopsin (NR, also known as NOP-1) is the first rhodopsin of the haloarchaeal type found in eucaryotes. NR demonstrates a very high degree of conservation of the amino acids that constitute the proton-conducting pathway in bacteriorhodopsin (BR), a light-driven proton pump of archaea. Nevertheless, NR does not appear to pump protons, suggesting the absence of the reprotonation switch that is necessary for the active transport. The photocycle of NR is much slower than that of BR, similar to the case of pharaonis phoborhodopsin (ppR), an archaeal photosensory protein. The functional and photochemical differences between NR and BR should be explained in the structural context. In this paper, we studied the structural changes of NR following retinal photoisomerization by means of low-temperature Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and compared the obtained spectra with those for BR. For the spectroscopic analysis, we established the light-adaptation procedure for NR reconstituted into 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero- 3-phosphocholine/1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphate (DMPC/DMPA) liposomes, which takes approximately 2 orders of magnitudes longer than in BR. The structure of the retinal chromophore and the hydrogen-bonding strength of the Schiff base in NR are similar to those in BR. Unique spectral features are observed for the S-H stretching vibrations of cysteine and amide-I vibrations for NR before and after retinal isomerization. In NR, there are no spectral changes assignable to the amide bands of alpha helices. The most prominent difference between NR and BR was seen for the water O-D stretching vibrations (measured in D(2)O). Unlike for haloarchaeal rhodopsins such as BR and ppR, no O-D stretches of water under strong hydrogen-bonded conditions (<2400 cm(-1)) were observed in the NR(K) minus NR difference spectra. This suggests a unique hydrogen-bonded network of the Schiff base region, which may be responsible for the lack of the reprotonation switch in NR.     

Crystal structure of the eukaryotic light-driven proton-pumping rhodopsin, Acetabularia rhodopsin II, from marine alga

Acetabularia rhodopsin (AR) is a rhodopsin from the marine plant Acetabularia acetabulum. The opsin-encoding gene from A. acetabulum, ARII, was cloned and found to be novel but homologous to that reported previously. ARII is a light-driven proton pump, as demonstrated by the existence of a photo-induced current through Xenopus oocytes expressing ARII. The photochemical reaction of ARII prepared by cell-free protein synthesis was similar to that of bacteriorhodopsin (BR), except for the lack of light-dark adaptation and the different proton release and uptake sequence. The crystal structure determined at 3.2 Å resolution is the first structure of a eukaryotic member of the microbial rhodopsin family. The structure of ARII is similar to that of BR. From the cytoplasmic side to the extracellular side of the proton transfer pathway in ARII, Asp92, a Schiff base, Asp207, Asp81, Arg78, Glu199, and Ser189 are arranged in positions similar to those of the corresponding residues directly involved in proton transfer by BR. The side-chain carboxyl group of Asp92 appears to interact with the sulfhydryl group of Cys218, which is unique to ARII and corresponds to Leu223 of BR and to Asp217 of Anabaena sensory rhodopsin. The orientation of the Arg78 side chain is opposite to the corresponding Arg82 of BR. The putative absence of water molecules around Glu199 and Arg78 may disrupt the formation of the low-barrier hydrogen bond at Glu199, resulting in the “late proton release”.     

Role of the cytoplasmic domain in Anabaena sensory rhodopsin photocycling: vectoriality of Schiff base deprotonation

Light-induced electric signals in intact E. coli cells generated by heterologously expressed full-length and C-terminally truncated versions of Anabaena sensory rhodopsin (ASR) demonstrate that the charge movements within the membrane-embedded part of the molecule are stringently controlled by the cytoplasmic domain. In particular, truncation inverts the direction of proton movement during Schiff base deprotonation from outward to cytoplasmic. Truncation also alters faster charge movements that occur before Schiff base deprotonation. Asp(217) as previously shown by FTIR serves as a proton acceptor in the truncated ASR but not in the full-length version, and its mutation to Asn restores the natural outward direction of proton movement. Introduction of a potential negative charge (Ser(86) to Asp) on the cytoplasmic side favors a cytoplasmic direction of proton release from the Schiff base. In contrast, mutation of the counterion Asp(75) to Glu reverses the photocurrent to the outward direction in the truncated pigment, and in both truncated and full-length versions accelerates Schiff base deprotonation more than 10-fold. The communication between the cytoplasmic domain and the membrane-embedded photoactive site of ASR demonstrated here is likely to derive from the receptor's use of a cytoplasmic protein for signal transduction, as has been suggested previously from binding studies.     

Transducer protein HtrI controls proton movements in sensory rhodopsin I

Sensory rhodopsin I (SR-I lambda(max) 587 nm) is a phototaxis receptor in the archaeon Halobacterium salinarium. Photoisomerization of retinal in SR-I generates a long-lived intermediate with lambda(max) 373 nm which transmits a signal to the membrane-bound transducer protein HtrI. Although SR-I is structurally similar to the electrogenic proton pump bacteriorhodopsin (BR), early studies showed its photoreactions do not pump protons, nor result in membrane hyperpolarization. These studies used functionally active SR-I, that is, SR-I complexed with its transducer HtrI. Using recombinant DNA methods we have expressed SR-I protein containing mutations in ionizable residues near the protonated Schiff base, and studied wild-type and site-specifically mutated SR-I in the presence and absence of the transducer protein. UV-Vis kinetic absorption spectroscopy, FT-IR, and pH and membrane potential probes reveal transducer-free SR-I photoreactions result in vectorial proton translocation across the membrane in the same direction as that of BR. This proton pumping is suppressed by interaction with transducer which diverts the proton movements into an electroneutral path. A key step in this diversion is that transducer interaction raises the pK(a) of the aspartyl residue in SR-I (Asp76) which corresponds to the primary proton-accepting residue in the BR pump (Asp85). In transducer-free SR-I, our evidence indicates the pK(a) of Asp76 is 7.2, and ionized Asp76 functions as the Schiff base proton acceptor in the SR-I pump. In the SR-I/HtrI complex, the pK(a) of Asp76 is 8.5, and therefore at physiological pH (7.4) Asp76 is neutral. Protonation changes on Asp76 are clearly not required for signaling since the SR-I mutants D76N and D76A are active in phototaxis. The latent proton-translocation potential of SR-I may reflect the evolution of the SR-I sensory signaling mechanism from the proton pumping mechanism of BR.     

Proteorhodopsin is a light-driven proton pump with variable vectoriality

Proteorhodopsin, a homologue of archaeal bacteriorhodopsin (BR), belongs to a newly identified family of retinal proteins from marine bacteria, which could play an important role in the energy balance of the biosphere. We cloned the cDNA sequence of proteorhodopsin by chemical gene synthesis, expressed the protein in Escherichia coli cells, purified and reconstituted the protein in its functional active state. The photocycle characteristics were determined by time-resolved absorption and Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy. The pH-dependence of the absorption spectrum indicates that the pK(a) of the primary acceptor of the Schiff base proton (Asp97) is 7.68. Generally, the photocycle of proteorhodopsin is similar to that of BR, although an L-like photocycle intermediate was not detectable. Whereas at pH>7 an M-like intermediate is formed upon illumination, at pH 5 no M-like intermediate could be detected. As the photocycle kinetics do not change between the acidic and alkaline state of proteorhodopsin, the only difference between these two forms is the protonation status of Asp97. This is corroborated by time-resolved FT-IR spectroscopy, which demonstrates that proton transfer from the retinal Schiff base to Asp97 is observed at alkaline pH, but the other vibrational changes are essentially pH-independent.After reconstitution into proteoliposomes, light-induced proton currents of proteorhodopsin were measured in a compound membrane system where proteoliposomes were adsorbed to planar lipid bilayers. Our results show that proteorhodopsin is a light-driven proton pump with characteristics similar to those of BR at alkaline pH. However, at acidic pH, the direction of proton pumping is inverted. Complementary experiments were carried out on proteorhodopsin expressed heterologously in Xenopus laevis oocytes under voltage clamp conditions.The following results were obtained. (1) At alkaline pH, proteorhodopsin mediates outwardly directed proton pumping like BR. (2) The direction of proton pumping can be inverted, when Asp97 is protonated. (3) The current can be inverted by changes of the polarity of the applied voltage. (4) The light intensity-dependence of the photocurrents leads to the conclusion that the alkaline form of proteorhodopsin shows efficient proton pumping after sequential excitation by two photons.     

Proton transport by sensory rhodopsins and its modulation by transducer-binding

The study of light-induced proton transfers in the archaeal sensory rhodopsins (SR), phototaxis receptors in Halobacterium salinarum, has contributed important insights into their mechanism of signaling to their cognate transducer subunits in the signaling complex. Essential features of the bacteriorhodopsin (BR) pumping mechanism have been conserved in the evolution of the sensors, which carry out light-driven electrogenic proton transport when their transducers are removed. The interaction of SRI with its transducer blocks proton-conducting channels in the receptor thereby inhibiting its proton pumping, indicating that the pump machinery, rather than the transport activity itself, is functionally important for signaling. Analysis of SRII mutants has shown that the salt bridge between the protonated Schiff base and its counterion Asp73 constrains the receptor in its inactive conformation. Similarly, in BR, the corresponding salt bridge between the protonated Schiff base and Asp85 contributes to constraining the protein in a conformation in which its cytoplasmic channel is closed. Transducer chimera studies further indicate that the receptor conformational changes are transmitted from the sensors to their cognate transducers through transmembrane helix-helix interaction. These and other results reviewed here support a signaling mechanism in which tilting of helices on the cytoplasmic side (primarily outward tilting of helix F), similar to that which occurs in BR in its open cytoplasmic channel conformation, causes structural alterations in the transducer transmembrane helices.