Ctf18 is required for homologous recombination-mediated double-strand break repair

The efficient repair of double-strand breaks (DSBs) is crucial in maintaining genomic integrity. Sister chromatid cohesion is important for not only faithful chromosome segregation but also for proper DSB repair. During DSB repair, the Smc1–Smc3 cohesin complex is loaded onto chromatin around the DSB to support recombination-mediated DSB repair. In this study, we investigated whether Ctf18, a factor implicated in the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion, is involved in DSB repair in budding yeast. Ctf18 was recruited to HO-endonuclease induced DSB sites in an Mre11-dependent manner and to damaged chromatin in G₂/M phase-arrested cells. The ctf18 mutant cells showed high sensitivity to DSB-inducible genotoxic agents and defects in DSB repair, as well as defects in damage-induced recombination between sister chromatids and between homologous chromosomes. These results suggest that Ctf18 is involved in damage-induced homologous recombination.     

Sister chromatid exchanges and chromatid interchanges in bloom's syndrome.

A comparison is made between the incidences of sister chromatid exchanges (SCE) per chromosome and group of chromosomes and breakage, visible at metaphase like open gaps, breaks, and breaks involved in chromatid interchange formation (CI) in Bloom's syndrome. It can be shown that the two levels of breakage SCE and CI are not correlated as to the locations. The discussion deals with possible interpretations of preferential breakage and reunion at certain homologous chromosomes and the difficulties today to understand SCEs.     

Cohesin Is Limiting for the Suppression of DNA Damage–Induced Recombination between Homologous Chromosomes

Double-strand break (DSB) repair through homologous recombination (HR) is an evolutionarily conserved process that is generally error-free. The risk to genome stability posed by nonallelic recombination or loss-of-heterozygosity could be reduced by confining HR to sister chromatids, thereby preventing recombination between homologous chromosomes. Here we show that the sister chromatid cohesion complex (cohesin) is a limiting factor in the control of DSB repair and genome stability and that it suppresses DNA damage–induced interactions between homologues. We developed a gene dosage system in tetraploid yeast to address limitations on various essential components in DSB repair and HR. Unlike RAD50 and RAD51, which play a direct role in HR, a 4-fold reduction in the number of essential MCD1 sister chromatid cohesion subunit genes affected survival of gamma-irradiated G₂/M cells. The decreased survival reflected a reduction in DSB repair. Importantly, HR between homologous chromosomes was strongly increased by ionizing radiation in G₂/M cells with a single copy of MCD1 or SMC3 even at radiation doses where survival was high and DSB repair was efficient. The increased recombination also extended to nonlethal doses of UV, which did not induce DSBs. The DNA damage–induced recombinants in G₂/M cells included crossovers. Thus, the cohesin complex has a dual role in protecting chromosome integrity: it promotes DSB repair and recombination between sister chromatids, and it suppresses damage-induced recombination between homologues. The effects of limited amounts of Mcd1and Smc3 indicate that small changes in cohesin levels may increase the risk of genome instability, which may lead to genetic diseases and cancer.     

Chromosomal aberrations in peripheral lymphocytes of patients treated with radium-224 for ankylosing spondylitis

The aim of this study was to investigate the in vivo frequency of chromosomal aberrations (primarily dicentric chromosomes and chromatid breaks) potentially induced by ²²⁴Ra -radiation in peripheral lymphocytes. The study was designed to serve as a cytogenetic analysis along with the therapeutic procedure of ankylosing spondylitis patients who were undergoing a treatment with ²²⁴Ra-chloride. The total administered activity was 10 MBq, and the treatment followed a schedule of 10 i.v. injections per week, each with a dose of 1 MBq of ²²⁴Ra. The calculation of absorbed doses delivered to the blood used the models suggested by the ICRP and yielded a value of 4.7 mGy/MBq. The frequency of chromosomal aberrations observed during the course of therapy was related to the blood dose. The frequency of dicentric chromosomes induced in vivo was found to agree well with the corresponding value of dicentrics induced in vitro. However—given that peripheral lymphocytes are in the cell cycles G₀ stage—an unexpected increase with dose in the yield of chromatid breaks was observed, with about 95% of them occurring in cells without any other chromosome-type aberrations. Reasons for the production of chromatid breaks are discussed.     

High resolution studies on the pattern of induced exchanges in the human karyotype

The pattern of breakage and exchange induced by X-irradiation of human lymphocytes at G₁ has been analysed in PHA transformed cultures at X₁ metaphase in cells treated with trypsin. All the events observed occurred in interband segments. Moreover, as far as the autosomes were concerned, these events appear to be at random in relation to trypsin interband length but give some indication of non-randomness when total chromosome length is considered. The X and Y chromosomes, on the other hand, show far fewer breaks than would be expected whichever criterion is adopted, and in particular appear to be isolated from the autosomes with respect to the occurrence of exchange events. — The analysis of specific break points in relation to trypsin banding sequences, makes it clear that conclusions regarding chromosome rearrangements based solely on conventional preparations may be misleading.     

The effect of G2-treatments with 2′-deoxyadenosine on the frequency of chromatid aberrations in human lymphocytes depends on the type of culture

The effect of G₂-treatments with 2-deoxyadenosine (dAdo) on the frequency of chromatid aberrations in X-irradiated and unirradiated human lymphocytes depends on the method of culture. In whole-blood cultures dAdo alone produced very few if any aberrations, but in the presence of inhibitors of adenosine deaminase (ADA), such as EHNA or coformycin, a high frequency of chromatid gaps, chromatid breaks, and isochromatid breaks were produced. In cultures of purified lymphocytes, dAdo produced aberrations even in the absence of an ADA inhibitor. Apparently the lymphocytes are protected against the chromosome-damaging effect of dAdo by the ADA activity of the erythrocytes. — When given as a post-treatment, dAdo also enhances the frequency of chromatid aberrations induced by X-rays in G₂. In whole-blood cultures this effect is obtained even in the absence of an ADA inhibitor, although the concentration required to produce enhancement is about twenty times higher than in the presence of the inhibitor.     

Isolation and subregional mapping of a human cDNA clone detecting a common RELP on chromosome 12

Summary Peripheral blood lymphocytes from three patients with Down syndrome (DS; trisomy 21; aged 5–6 years) and three age-matched control children were studied for the induction of chromosomal aberrations and sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs).Cells in G₀ were exposed to bleomycin (20–100 g/ml) for 3 h, and then cultured in medium containing 5-bromodeoxyuridine and phytohemagglutinin for 66 h. By the sister chromatid differential staining method, chromosome analyses were performed on metaphase cells that had divided one, two, or three or more times after treatment. The results indicate that DS cells exposed to bleomycin are hypersensitive to the production of dicentric and ring chromosomes compared to normal cells. Bleomycin also led to a dose-related increase in the frequency of SCEs, but no difference was found between the SCE frequencies in DS or normal lymphocytes exposed to bleomycin.     

The induction of chromatid deletions in accord with the breakage-and-reunion hypothesis.

In the present experiments it has been possible to study large numbers of X-ray induced chromatid deletions, or breads, in Chinese hamster chromosomes and to discern whether or not a sister chromatid exchange also occurs at the point of breadage. Chromatid deletions are only infrequently associated with a sister chromatid exchange. This is contrary to the expectations derived from the exchange hypothesis of Revell. Pn the basis of this hypothesis, in which chromatid deletions are considered to be incomplete exchanges that occur in the necks of little loops in the chromosomes, 40% of the chromatid breaks are expected to be associated with sister chromatid exchanges. The present data are in accord with the conclusions drawn from the earlier autoradiographic experiments of HEDDLE AND BODYCOTE, and show that chromatide breaks can be accounted for on the basis of the breakage-and reunion hypothesis, with the majority being simple breaks and some being incomplete exchanges between two such breaks.     

Effects of X-irradiation in G1 and G2 on Bloom's syndrome and normal chromosomes

Summary The X-ray sensitivity of chromosomes from a Bloom's syndrome patient and a normal control was compared in G₁ and G₂. There was no significant difference in the number of aberrations induced by irradiation in G₁. An increased sensitivity of the BS chromosomes was found in G₂. The frequency of mitotic chiasmata in the BS cells was not increased by the G₂-irradiation, even though the frequency of chromatid translocations was much increased. This provides further evidence for the fundamental difference of these two phenomena. Evidence from the types of aberrations induced suggests that there is no appreciably increased frequency of pairing of homologous chromosomes in the BS cells over that in normal cells.     

Origin of symmetrical triradial chromosomes in human cells

We have collected 23 sporadic symmetrical triradial chromosomes (plus one D with duplicate satellites), 22 from cultured lymphocytes and one from a bone marrow cell. Fifteen triradials were from patients with Bloom's syndrome, and two from a Fanconi's anemia patient. The following chromosomes and chromosome groups were involved: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, C (11 identified), D, and 17. The branchpoints were localized nonrandomly. Regions in or near centric heterochromatin were often involved. Some of the branchpoints are regions which also contain a high number of mitotic chiasmata. When the present sporadic triradials combined with those from the literature were compared with triradials with branchpoints in the fragile regions, the localized branchpoints were different in these two groups. Our conclusion that most — possibly all — symmetrical triradials are caused by partial endoreduplication is based on the following observations: the shape of the triradials which shows that the extra segments are paired with their intact sister chromatids and not with each other; the failure of X-rays in G₂ to increase the incidence of symmetrical triradials; the fact that in some cases the end of the extra segment is joined to its intact sister chromatid; and the occurrence of duplicate satellites.     

Sister Chromatid Cohesion

During S phase, not only does DNA have to be replicated, but also newly synthesized DNA molecules have to be connected with each other. This sister chromatid cohesion is essential for the biorientation of chromosomes on the mitotic or meiotic spindle, and is thus an essential prerequisite for chromosome segregation. Cohesion is mediated by cohesin complexes that are thought to embrace sister chromatids as large rings. Cohesin binds to DNA dynamically before DNA replication and is converted into a stably DNA-bound form during replication. This conversion requires acetylation of cohesin, which in vertebrates leads to recruitment of sororin. Sororin antagonizes Wapl, a protein that is able to release cohesin from DNA, presumably by opening the cohesin ring. Inhibition of Wapl by sororin therefore “locks” cohesin rings on DNA and allows them to maintain cohesion for long periods of time in mammalian oocytes, possibly for months or even years.DNA replication during the synthesis (S) phase generates identical DNA molecules, which, in their chromatinized form, are called sister chromatids. The pairs of sister chromatids remain united as part of one chromosome during the subsequent gap (G₂) phase and during early mitosis, in prophase, prometaphase, and metaphase. During these stages of mitosis chromosomes condense, in most eukaryotes the nuclear envelope breaks down, and in all species chromosomes are ultimately attached to both poles of the mitotic spindle. Only once this biorientation has been achieved for all chromosomes, the sister chromatids are separated from each other in anaphase and transported toward opposite spindle poles of the mother cell, enabling its subsequent division into two genetically identical daughter cells.This series of events critically depends on the fact that sister chromatids remain physically connected with each other from S phase until metaphase. This physical connection, called sister chromatid cohesion, opposes the pulling forces that are generated by microtubules that attach to kinetochores and thereby enables the biorientation of chromosomes on the mitotic spindle (Tanaka et al. 2000b). Without cohesion, sister chromatids could therefore not be segregated symmetrically between the forming daughter cells, resulting in aneuploidy. For the same reasons, cohesion is essential for chromosome segregation in meiosis I and meiosis II. Cohesion defects in human oocytes can lead to aneuploidy, which is thought to be the major cause of spontaneous abortion, because only a few types of aneuploidy are compatible with viability, such as trisomy 21 (Down syndrome), trisomy 18 (Edwards syndrome), and trisomy 13 (Patau syndrome) (Hunt and Hassold 2010). Studying the mechanisms of cohesion is therefore essential for understanding how the genome is passed properly from one cell generation to the next.In addition, sister chromatid cohesion facilitates the repair of DNA double-strand breaks in cells that have replicated their DNA, where such breaks can be repaired by a homologous recombination mechanism that uses the undamaged sister chromatid as a template (for review, see Watrin et al. 2006). Furthermore, mutations in the proteins that are required for sister chromatid cohesion can cause defects in chromatin structure and gene regulation, and can in rare cases lead to congenital developmental disorders, called Cornelia de Lange syndrome, Roberts/SC Phocomelia syndrome, and Warsaw Breakage syndrome (for review, see Mannini et al. 2010).     

Dicentric chromosomes and the inactivation of the centromere

Summary The origin and behavior of human dicentric chromosomes are reviewed. Most dicentrics between two non-homologous or two homologous chromosomes (isodicentrics), which are permanent members of a chromosome complement, probably originate from segregation of an adjacent quadriradial; such configurations are the result of a chromatid translocation between two nonhomologous chromosomes, or they represent an adjacent counterpart of a mitotic chiasma. The segregation of such a quadriradial may also give rise to a cell line monosomic for the chromosome concerned (e.g., a 45,X line). Contrary to the generally held opinion, isodicentrics rarely result from an isolocal break in two chromatids followed by rejoining of sister chromatids. In this case the daughter centromeres go to opposite poles in the next anaphase, and the resulting bridge breaks at a random point. This mechanism, therefore, leads to the formation of an isodicentric chromosome only if the two centromeres are close together, or if one centromere is immediately inactivated. Observations on the origin of dicentrics in Bloom syndrome support these conclusions. One centromere is permanently inactivated in most dicentric chromosomes, and even when the dicentric breaks into two chromosomes, the centromere is not reactivated. The appearance and behavior of the acentric X chromosomes show that their centromeres are similarly inactivated and not prematurely divided. Two Bloom syndrome lymphocytes, one with an extra chromosome 2 and the other with an extra chromosome 7, each having an inactivated centromere, show that this can also happen in monocentric autosomes.     

The stage of chromosome duplication in the cell cycle as revealed by X-ray breakage and 3H-thymidine labeling

By means of combined experiments of X-irradiation and ³H-thymidine labeling of the chromosomes which are in the phase of synthesis, and the subsequent analysis at metaphase on the autoradiographs of the chromosomal damage induced during interphase, it was shown that in somatic cells from a quasi-diploid Chinese hamster line cultured in vitro the chromosomes change their response to radiation from single (chromosome type aberrations) to double (chromatid type aberrations) in late G₁. These results are interpreted to indicate that the chromosome splits into two chromatids in G₁, before DNA replication. — By extending the observations at the second metaphase after irradiation, it was also seen that cells irradiated while in G₂ or late S when they reach the second post-irradiation mitosis still exhibit, beside chromosome type aberrations, many chromatid exchanges, some of which are labeled. Two hypotheses are suggested to account for this unexpected reappearance of chromatid aberrations at the second post-irradiation division. The first hypothesis is that they arise from half-chromatid aberrations. The second hypothesis, which derives from a new interpretation of the mechanisms of production of chromosome aberrations recently forwarded by Evans, is that they arise from gaps or achromatic lesions which undergo, as the cells go through the next cycle, a two-step repair process culminating in the production of aberrations.This work was supported in part by grant No. RH-00304 from the Division of Radiological Health, Bureau of State Services, Public Health Service, U.S.A.     

Sister chromatid exchanges occur in G2-irradiated cells

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are arguably the most important lesions induced by ionizing radiation (IR) since unrepaired or misrepaired DSBs can lead to chromosomal aberrations and cell death. The two major pathways to repair IR-induced DSBs are non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR). Perhaps surprisingly, NHEJ represents the predominant pathway in the G₁ and G₂ phases of the cell cycle, but HR also contributes and repairs a subset of IR-induced DSBs in G₂. Following S-phase-dependent genotoxins, HR events give rise to sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs), which can be detected cytogenetically in mitosis. Here, we describe that HR occurring in G₂-irradiated cells also generates SCEs in ∼50% of HR events. Since HR of IR-induced DSBs in G₂ is a slow process, SCE formation in G₂-irradiated cells requires several hours. During this time, irradiated S-phase cells can also reach mitosis, which has contributed to the widely held belief that SCEs form only during S phase. We describe procedures to measure SCEs exclusively in G₂-irradiated cells and provide evidence that following IR cells do not need to progress through S phase in order to form SCEs.Key words: sister chromatid exchanges, double-strand break repair, ionizing radiation, homologous recombination, G₂ phase     

Homology-mediated end-capping as a primary step of sister chromatid fusion in the breakage-fusion-bridge cycles

Breakage-fusion-bridge (BFB) cycle is a series of chromosome breaks and duplications that could lead to the increased copy number of a genomic segment (gene amplification). A critical step of BFB cycles leading to gene amplification is a palindromic fusion of sister chromatids following the rupture of a dicentric chromosome during mitosis. It is currently unknown how sister chromatid fusion is produced from a mitotic break. To delineate the process, we took an integrated genomic, cytogenetic and molecular approach for the recurrent MCL1 amplicon at chromosome 1 in human tumor cells. A newly developed next-generation sequencing-based approach identified a cluster of palindromic fusions within the amplicon at ∼50-kb intervals, indicating a series of breaks and fusions by BFB cycles. The physical location of the amplicon (at the end of a broken chromosome) further indicated BFB cycles as underlying processes. Three palindromic fusions were mediated by the homologies between two nearby inverted Alu repeats, whereas the other two fusions exhibited microhomology-mediated events. Such breakpoint sequences indicate that homology-mediated fold-back capping of broken ends followed by DNA replication is an underlying mechanism of sister chromatid fusion. Our results elucidate nucleotide-level events during BFB cycles and end processing for naturally occurring mitotic breaks.     

The repair of x-ray-induced chromosome aberrations in stimulated and unstimulated human lymphocytes

The repair time for chromosome breaks induced by X-irradiation of unstimulated (G₀) and stimulated (G₁) human lymphocytes has been determined by dose fractionation studies. In both types of cells repair time was approx. 4–5 h. Treatment with hydroxyurea, a DNA synthesis inhibitor, did not prevent or delay the rejoining of broken chromosomes, whereas treatment with cycloheximide, a potent protein synthesis inhibitor, did. Thus, the repair of radiation-induced chromosome breaks in human lymphocytes is similar to the repair observed with plant cells.     

Telomerase-dependent and -independent chromosome healing in mouse embryonic stem cells

Telomeres play an important role in protecting the ends of chromosomes and preventing chromosome fusion. We have previously demonstrated that double-strand breaks near telomeres in mammalian cells result in either the addition of a new telomere at the site of the break, termed chromosome healing, or sister chromatid fusion that initiates chromosome instability. In the present study, we have investigated the role of telomerase in chromosome healing and the importance of chromosome healing in preventing chromosome instability. In embryonic stem cell lines that are wild type for the catalytic subunit of telomerase (TERT), chromosome healing at I-SceI-induced double-strand breaks near telomeres accounted for 22 of 35 rearrangements, with the new telomeres added directly at the site of the break in all but one instance. In contrast, in two TERT-knockout embryonic stem cell lines, chromosome healing accounted for only 1 of 62 rearrangements, with a 23 bp insertion at the site of the sole chromosome-healing event. However, in a third TERT-knockout embryonic stem cell line, 10PTKO-A, chromosome healing was a common event that accounted for 20 of 34 rearrangements. Although this chromosome healing also occurred at the I-SceI site, differences in the microhomology at the site of telomere addition demonstrated that the mechanism was distinct from that in wild-type embryonic stem cell lines. In addition, the newly added telomeres in 10PTKO-A shortened with time in culture, eventually resulting in either telomere elongation through a telomerase-independent mechanism or loss of the subtelomeric plasmid sequences entirely. The combined results demonstrate that chromosome healing can occur through both telomerase-dependent and -independent mechanisms, and that although both mechanisms can prevent degradation and sister chromatid fusion, neither mechanism is efficient enough to prevent sister chromatid fusion from occurring in many cells experiencing double-strand breaks near telomeres.     

Molecular mechanisms involved in the production of cromosomal aberrations II. Utilization of neurospora endonuclease for the study of aberration production by X-rays in G1 and G2 stages of the cell cycle

Chinese hamster ovary cells (CHO) were X-irradiated in G₁ and G₂ stages of the cell cycle and subsequently Neurospora endonuclease (NE) (E.C.3.1.4), an enzyme which is specific in cleaving single-stranded DNA, was introduced into the cells, after making the cells permeable by treatment with inactivated Sendai virus. With this treatment all classes of X-ray-induced chromatid aberrations increased in G₂ cells, whereas in G₁ cells an increase in cromosome type of aberrations was found, associated with a profound induction of chromatid type of aberrations as well. Duration of the availability of single-strand gaps for the action of NE has been studied in G₂ cells following X-irradiation and the influence of different parts of the G₂ stage on the type and frequencies of chromatid aberrations was discerned. While the increase in chromosome type of aberrations by NE in X-irradiated G₁ cells has been interpreted as due to the conversion of DNA single-strand breaks or gaps to double-strand breaks by NE, the induction of chromatid aberrations in G₁ has been assumed to be due to conversion of some of the damaged bases strand breaks by NE. Biochemical evidence is presented for the conversion by NE of DNA single-strand breaks induced by X-rays into double-strand breaks using neutral sucrose gradient centrifugation.     

The parental origin and mechanism of formation of three dicentric X chromosomes

Summary Cytogenetic and molecular analyses of three dicentric X chromosomes were performed in an attempt to identify the parental origin and mechanism of formation of the aberant chromosomes. Results indicate that, in these three cases, the dicentric chromosomes were formed by chromatid breakage and reunion of sister chromatids at the breakpoint. In two cases the abnormal chromosomes were paternal in origin; in the third case the dicentric originated from the maternal X chromosome.     

Relationship of spontaneous chromosome instability and sister chromatid exchanges in Fanconi's anemia

The frequency of spontaneous instability of lymphocyte chromosomes of the first 2 mitoses, the rate of sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs), and the proliferative kinetics of lymphocytes were studied in a 6-year-old girl with Fanconi's anemia (FA) and in 4 healthy donors. The frequencies of aberrant cells and the total number of chromosome breaks in the FA patient decreased with cell transition from the first to the second mitosis. The FA lymphocytes had a slower proliferative kinetics and the level of SCEs was higher as compared with control. The probability of chromatid deletions at the sites of SCEs localization and in the dark and light stained chromatids was unequal. 33.8% of chromatid breaks were associated with SCEs. The data point to the relationship between SCEs and spontaneous chromosome instability in AF cells.