Impact of furazolidone-based quadruple therapy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori after previous treatment failures

Background. One week of quadruple therapy including metronidazole is recommended for Helicobacter pylori treatment failures after first line therapy regardless of resistance status. This study investigated whether a quadruple regimen containing furazolidone could be effective as a third‐line (salvage) therapy. Methods. All patients with previous H. pylori treatment failure after a clarithromycin‐metronidazole ± amoxicillin combination plus acid suppression were given lansoprazole 30 mg twice a day (bid), tripotassiumdicitratobismuthate 240 mg bid, tetracycline 1 g bid, metronidazole 400 mg (PPI‐B‐T‐M) three times a day (tid) for 1 week. In the case of treatment failure with this second‐line therapy, the same regimen was applied for 1 week except for using furazolidone 200 mg bid (PPI‐B‐T‐F) instead of metronidazole (sequential study design). Results. Eighteen consecutive patients were treated with PPI‐B‐T‐M. Eleven of those 18 remained H. pylori positive (38.9% cured). Pretherapeutic metronidazole resistance was associated with a lower probability of eradication success (10% vs. 75%, p= .04). Ten of these 11 patients agreed to be retreated by PPI‐B‐T‐F. Final cure of H. pylori with PPI‐B‐T‐F was achieved in 9/10 patients (90%) nonresponsive to PPI‐B‐T‐M. Conclusions. In the presence of metronidazole resistance, PPI‐B‐T‐M as a recommended second‐line therapy by the Maastricht consensus conference achieved unacceptable low cure rates in our metronidazole pretreated population. In this population, metronidazole based second‐line quadruple therapy may be best suited in case of a metronidazole‐free first line‐regimen (e.g. PPI‐clarithromycin‐amoxicillin) or a low prevalence of metronidazole resistance. Furazolidone in the PPI‐B‐T‐F combination does not have a cross‐resistance potential to metronidazole and is a promising salvage option after a failed PPI‐B‐T‐M regimen.     

Twice-Daily Versus Thrice-Daily Clarithromycin in Combination with Ranitidine Bismuth Citrate in the Eradication of Helicobacter pylori

Background. Ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC), 400 mg bid for 4 weeks, plus clarithromycin, 500 mg tid, is a regimen approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori in patients with duodenal ulcers. Proof that the clarithromycin portion of the regimen could be given twice daily without loss of efficacy would reduce cost and improve patient compliance. The objective of this study was to compare the H. pylori eradication rates in patients who had duodenal ulcer and were randomly assigned to 4 weeks of treatment with RBC, 400 mg bid, in conjunction with 2 weeks of therapy with either clarithromycin, 500 mg tid, or clarithromycin, 500 mg bid. Patients and Methods. Patients who had a duodenal ulcer and were H. pylori–positive by at least two tests were randomly assigned to (1) RBC, 400 mg bid for 4 weeks, plus clarithromycin, 500 mg tid for 2 weeks, or (2) RBC, 400 mg bid for 4 weeks, plus clarithromycin, 500 mg bid for 2 weeks. H. pylori eradication was assessed 4 weeks after completion of RBC plus clarithromycin. Results. Three hundred eighty-three patients from 78 centers had a duodenal ulcer and were H. pylori–positive. The modified intent-to-treat (MITT) and the per-protocol (PP) eradication rates were statistically equivalent between the twice-daily (65% MITT, 74% PP) and thrice-daily (63% MITT, 73% PP) clarithromycin treatment regimens. Incidence and types of adverse events did not differ between the two groups. Conclusions. For eradicating H. pylori in patients with duodenal ulcer, clarithromycin, 500 mg bid for 2 weeks, with RBC, 400 mg bid for 4 weeks, is equivalent to clarithromycin, 500 mg tid with RBC. The potential enhancement of patient compliance, reduced cost of clarithromycin, and equivalent efficacy would support the use of twice-daily clarithromycin in triple-therapy regimens with RBC.     

A comparison between sequential therapy and a modified bismuth-based quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication in Iran: a randomized clinical trial

Background: Sequential regimens have been recently reported to be superior to the standard triple therapies in Helicobacter pylori eradication, but most of these studies were performed in Europe and data from developing countries are lacking. So we designed a study to compare a sequential regimen with a bismuth‐based quadruple therapy that contains a short course of furazolidone, in Iran. Methods: Two hundred and ninety‐six patients with duodenal ulcer and naïve H. pylori infection were randomized into two groups: 148 patients received (PAB‐F) pantoprazole (40 mg‐bid), amoxicillin (1 g‐bid), and bismuth subcitrate (240 mg‐bid) for 2 weeks and furazolidone (200 mg‐bid) just during the first week. And 148 patients received (PA‐CT) pantoprazole (40 mg‐bid) for 10 days, amoxicillin (1 g‐bid) for the first 5 days, and clarithromycin (500 mg‐bid) plus tinidazole (500 mg‐bid) just during the second 5 days. C¹⁴‐urea breath test was performed 8 weeks after the treatment. Results: Two hundred and sixty‐one patients completed the study (137 patients in the PA‐CT and 124 in the PAB‐F group). The results were not statistically different between the two groups in the eradication rates and the severity of side effects. The intention to treat eradication rate was 80.4% in the PAB‐F group and 83.7% in the PA‐CT group. Per‐protocol eradication rates were 88.7% and 89.1%, respectively. Conclusion: Because the two regimens showed acceptable and similar abilities in H. pylori eradication and because of much higher cost of clarithromycin in Iran, the furazolidone containing regimen seems to be superior. Further modifications of sequential therapies are needed to make them ideal regimens in developing countries.     

A pilot study evaluating sequential administration of a PPI-amoxicillin followed by a PPI-metronidazole-tetracycline in Turkey

BACKGROUND: There is no effective regimen for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori in our country. It may be due to the increasing prevalence of resistance to antibiotics used for the treatment of H. pylori. Recently, a study from Turkey has revealed that a new treatment scheme consisting of sequential administration of pantoprazole plus amoxicillin for 7 days followed by pantoprazole plus metronidazole, and tetracycline for the remaining 7 days was effective in the first-line treatment of H. pylori. Therefore, we aimed to confirm efficacy of a new therapy scheme in the first-line H. pylori eradication. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a prospective, open label, single center, pilot study and included 32 patients infected with H. pylori diagnosed by both histologic examinations, rapid urease test and (13)C-urea breath test (UBT). The patients received a 14-day sequential regimen (pantoprazole 40 mg b.d. plus amoxicillin 1000 mg b.d. for 7 days and pantoprazole 40 mg b.d., metronidazole 500 mg b.d. and tetracycline 500 mg q.d. for the remaining 7 days). Eradication was assessed with (13)C-UBT 4 weeks after completion of the therapy. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol eradication rates were determined. RESULTS: At intention-to-treat analysis, the eradication rate was 50% (16/32). For the per protocol analysis, the eradication rate was 57% (16/28). There were no significant adverse effects and treatment compliance was good. CONCLUSION: A new therapy consisting of sequentially administered drugs for 14 days yielded unacceptably low eradication rates. This scheme was not efficient for H. pylori eradication in our region. Further investigations are needed to determine the effectiveness of this scheme in other regions of Turkey.     

Pretreatment Antibiotic Resistance in Helicobacter pylori Infection: Results of Three Randomized Controlled Studies

Background. Although combinations of antibiotics and antisecretory drugs are useful for treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection, treatment failure is common. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relation between pretreatment antibiotic resistance and outcome by using six different treatment regimens for H. pylori infection. Patients and Methods. Three hundred sixty-nine consecutive H. pylori–infected patients with dyspeptic symptoms were enrolled in three consecutive randomized, controlled, single-center clinical trials: trial A, 128 patients; trial B, 125 patients; trial C, 116 patients. Treatments consisted of (A) a 15-day course of dual therapy (omeprazole, 20 mg bid, and amoxicillin, 1 gm bid, or clarithromycin, 500 mg tid) (OA vs OC); (B) a 7-day triple therapy of omeprazole, 20 mg bid, plus metronidazole, 500 mg bid, and amoxicillin, 1,000 mg bid, or clarithromycin, 500 mg tid (OMA vs OMC); or (C) omeprazole, 20 mg bid, plus metronidazole, 500 mg bid, plus tetracycline, 500 mg qid, or doxycycline, 100 mg tid (OMT vs OMD). Diagnostic endoscopy was made in all patients before and 5 to 6 weeks after therapy. Six biopsies were taken from each patient for histology, rapid urease test, and H. pylori culture; antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed using the E-test method. Results. Overall cure rates were poor for both dual therapies OA and OC (38% and 37%, respectively) and for triple therapies OMA, OMC, and OMD (57%, 55%, and 58%, respectively). The OMT combination was successful in 91% (95% confidence interval [CI], 80.4%–97%). Metronidazole resistance was present in 29.7% (95% CI, 24%–35%), amoxicillin resistance was present in 26% (95% CI, 21%–32%), clarithromycin resistance was present in 23.1% (95% CI, 18%–29%), tetracycline resistance was present in 14% (95% CI, 10%–20%), and doxycycline resistance was present in 33.3% (95% CI, 21%–47%). Antibiotic resistance markedly reduced the cure rates and accounted for most of the poor results with the triple therapies: 89% versus 23%; 77% versus 26%; 100% versus 60%; and 67% versus 23% for OMC, OMA, OMT, and OMD, respectively. OMT appeared to be the best because of the high success rate with metronidazole-resistant H. pylori (71%) and in low-level tetracycline resistance. Conclusions. Pretreatment antibiotic-resistant H. pylori can, in part, explain the low cure rate of the infection and the variability in outcome in reported trials.     

Sequential metronidazole-furazolidone or clarithromycin-furazolidone compared to clarithromycin-based quadruple regimens for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori in peptic ulcer disease: a double-blind randomized controlled trial

Background: Furazolidone is a much cheaper drug with a very low resistance against Helicobacter pylori compared to clarithromycin. We aim to evaluate safety and efficacy of a sequential furazolidone‐based regimen versus clarithromycin‐based therapy in H. pylori eradication for ulcer disease. Materials: Patients with proven peptic ulcer or duodenitis were randomized into three groups: OAB‐M‐F; metronidazole (M) (500 mg bid) for the first 5 days, followed by furazolidone (F) (200 mg bid) for the second 5 days; OAC‐P; clarithromycin (C) (500 mg bid) for 10 days; and OAB‐C‐F; clarithromycin (500 mg bid) for the first 5 days and furazolidone (200 mg bid) for the second 5 days. All groups received omeprazole (O) (20 mg bid) and amoxicillin (A) (1 g bid). Groups OAB‐M‐F and OAB‐C‐F were also given bismuth subcitrate (B) (240 mg bid), whereas a placebo (P) was given to group OAC‐P. Adverse events were scored and recorded. Two months after treatment, a C¹³‐urea breath test was performed. Results: Three hundred and ten patients were enrolled and 92 (OAB‐M‐F), 95 (OAC‐P), and 98 (OAB‐C‐F) completed the study. The intention‐to‐treat eradication rates were 78.5% (95% CI = 69–85), 81.1% (95% CI = 73–88), and 82% (95% CI = 74–89), and per‐protocol eradication rates were 91.3% (95% CI = 83–96), 90.4% (95% CI = 82–95), and 88.7% (95% CI = 81–94), for group OAB‐M‐F, OAC‐P, and OAB‐C‐F, respectively. Eradication rate differences did not reach statistical significance. The most common adverse event, bad taste, occurred in all groups, but more frequently in groups OAC‐P (34%) and OAB‐C‐F (32%), than OAB‐M‐F (14%) (p < .05). Adverse symptoms score were 0.88 ± 2.05 in group OAB‐M‐F, 1.15 ± 1.40 in group OAC‐P, and 1.87 ± 1.62 in group OAB‐C‐F. Conclusion: Furazolidone can replace clarithromycin in H. pylori eradication regimens because of lack of development of resistance and very low cost.     

Addition of metronidazole to rabeprazole-amoxicillin-clarithromycin regimen for Helicobacter pylori infection provides an excellent cure rate with five-day therapy

Background. New triple therapy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori based on a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) provides a cure rate of approximately 90% with few adverse effects. Recently, a PPI-based quadruple therapy, which consists of a PPI plus bismuth-based triple therapy for 7 days, has been studied, and a sufficient eradication rate has been achieved. However, a shorter duration results in improved compliance. In this study, newly developed short-term, simple twice-daily quadruple therapy consisting of rabeprazole, amoxicillin, clarithromycin, and metronidazole (RACM) was compared with a PPI-based triple-therapy regimen for eradication of H. pylori.
Patients and Methods. This study was designed as a randomized open, prospective single-center study. Of a total of 105 H. pylori –positive patients, 55 received the RACM regimen for 5 days (rabeprazole, 10 mg bid; amoxicillin, 750 mg bid; clarithromycin, 200 mg bid; and metronidazole, 250 mg bid), and 50 received the RAC regimen for 5 days (rabeprazole, 10 mg bid; amoxicillin, 750 mg bid; and clarithromycin, 200 mg bid). Cure of the infection was assessed by HpSA ( H. pylori stool antigen immunoassay) 1 month after completion of therapy.
Results. The rates of eradication of H. pylori by RACM versus RAC were 94.5% (95% CI, 85–99) versus 80.0% (95% CI, 66–90) by intention-to-treat analysis; 98.1% (95% CI, 90–100) versus 87.0% (95% CI, 74–95) by all-patients-treated analysis; and 98.1% (95% CI, 90–100) versus 86.7% (95% CI, 73–95) by per-protocol analysis. No major adverse effects were reported, and 98.0% of patients reported complete compliance.
Conclusions. The simple twice-daily and short-term quadruple regimen for only 5 days provided an excellent eradication rate. Compliance with the regimen was high, and serious adverse effects were few. Therefore, the RACM regimen can be considered as safe and effective.     

Eradication of H. pylori with pantoprazole, clarithromycin, and metronidazole in duodenal ulcer patients: a head-to-head comparison between two regimens of different duration

Background. The study was conducted to compare the efficacy and tolerability of two pantoprazole-based triple therapies of different length in the eradication of H. pylori.
Methods. In this double-blind, multicenter parallel group comparison, H. pylori -positive patients were randomly assigned to either the PCM-7 group (7 days of pantoprazole 40 mg bid, clarithromycin 500 mg bid, metronidazole 500 mg bid) or the PCM-14 m group (modified 14 day therapy of the same regimen with metronidazole only given for 10 days due to labeling reasons). H. pylori status was determined by urease test, histology, culture, and ¹³C-urea breath test. Treatment outcome was assessed 6 weeks after intake of the last study medication.
Results. The following eradication rates were achieved: for PCM-7 in the MITT population 83% (89/107), in the PP population 84% (81/97); for PCM-14 m in MITT 87% (92/106), in PP 88% (91/104). Ulcer healing rates were: for PCM-7 in MITT population 99% (106/107), in the PP population 99% (96/97); for PCM-14 m in MITT 99% (105/106), in PP 99% (103/104). Gastrointestinal symptoms and gastritis scores decreased in both treatment groups. Equivalence of treatment regimens could be proven for all populations. In total, 64 patients reported adverse events. Five serious adverse events occurred, all unrelated to the study medication.
Conclusion. The two pantoprazole-based triple therapies tested in this study are equally effective in H. pylori eradication, ulcer healing and relief from ulcer pain. It is concluded that 7 days of triple therapy are generally sufficient.     

High Efficacy of 14‐Day Triple Therapy‐Based,Bismuth‐Containing Quadruple Therapy for Initial Helicobacter pylori Eradication

Background: The success rate of currently recommended 7‐day triple therapy with a PPI plus amoxicillin and clarithromycin has fallen into the unacceptable range. It is urgent to look for a new strategy to treat the infection of Helicobacter pylori. Aims: To observe the efficacy of triple therapy‐based, bismuth‐containing quadruple therapy for H. pylori treatment. Methods: A total of 160 patients with functional dyspepsia who were Hp+ were randomly assigned into two groups. Regimen: Omeprazole 20 mg, Amoxicillin 1.0 g, Clarithromycin 500 mg and Bismuth Potassium Citrate 220 mg, twice a day. Eighty patients received 7‐day quadruple therapy and 80 patients received the same therapy for 14 days. Six weeks after treatment, H. pylori eradication was assessed by ¹³C‐urea breath test. Minimal inhibitory concentrations of metronidazole, clarithromycin and amoxicillin of clinical isolates were determined by the twofold agar dilution method. Results: Fourteen‐day therapy led to a significant increase of H. pylori eradication success when compared to 7‐day therapy in the intention‐to‐treat analysis (93.7 vs 80.0%; p = .01), and the per‐protocol analysis (97.4 vs 82.0%; p = .0016). The H. pylori resistance rates to metronidazole, clarithromycin and amoxicillin were 42.1, 18.0 and 0%. Fourteen‐day therapy was significantly more effective in patients with clarithromycin‐resistant strains. Incidences of adverse events were comparable. Conclusions: Addition bismuth and prolonging treatment duration can overcome H. pylori resistance to clarithromycin and decrease the bacterial load. Fourteen‐day triple therapy‐based, bismuth‐containing quadruple therapy achieved ITT success rate 93% and could be recommended as the first line eradication regimen.     

四联疗法与序贯疗法根除幽门螺杆菌疗效观察

目的：探讨四联疗法和序贯疗法根除幽门螺杆菌的疗效和安全性。方法：将150例14C尿素呼气试验阳性的慢性胃炎患者随机分为A、B、C3组各50例。A组（四联疗法）给予雷贝拉唑、枸橼酸铋钾、克拉霉素、阿莫西林治疗7d;B组（序贯疗法）前5d给予雷贝拉唑、阿莫西林,后5d给予雷贝拉唑、克拉霉素、甲硝唑治疗;C组（标准三联疗法）给予雷贝拉唑、克拉霉素、阿莫西林治疗治疗7d。疗程结束4周后行14C尿素呼气试验检测。结果：A组根除率为94％,B组根除率为90％,c组根除率68％。A组和B组优于c组（P〈0．01）;A组、B组无显著差异性（P〉0．05）。三组均无严重不良反应。结论：四联疗法与序贯疗法H．pylori根除率优干标缝三联疗法．四联疗法和庠骨疗法疗效无．明昂差异性．     

A Randomized Clinical Trial to Determine the Efficacy of Regimens Containing Clarithromycin, Metronidazole, and Amoxicillin Among Histologic Subgroups for Helicobacter pylori Eradication in a Developing Country

Background: Most treatments deemed effective for Helicobacter pylori eradication in developed countries are less effective in developing countries. Regimens containing clarithromycin, metronidazole, and amoxicillin seem efficacious despite antibiotic resistance, and may be a viable option in developing countries. Materials and Methods: We evaluated the efficacy of a 14‐day regimen with 500 mg clarithromycin b.i.d., 500 mg metronidazole t.i.d., and 500 mg amoxicillin t.i.d. (with and without a proton pump inhibitor), and a 10‐day regimen containing 500 mg clarithromycin b.i.d., 1 g amoxicillin b.i.d., and 20 mg omeprazole b.i.d. in Pasto, Colombia, using a randomized, single‐blind design stratified by presence of atrophic gastritis. Results: H. pylori was eradicated in 86.8% and 85.3% of the participants randomized to a clarithromycin‐metronidazole‐amoxicillin and clarithromycin‐amoxicillin‐omeprazole regimens, respectively (p = .79). Per‐protocol analyses indicated greater efficacy for the clarithromycin‐metronidazole‐amoxicillin regimen (97%) versus the clarithromycin‐amoxicillin‐omeprazole regimen (86%) (p = .04), particularly for participants with atrophic gastritis (clarithromycin‐metronidazole‐amoxicillin = 100%, clarithromycin‐amoxicillin‐omeprazole = 81%; p = .02). Adverse events were mild, but adverse event‐related non‐compliance was reported more often for regimens containing clarithromycin, metronidazole, and amoxicillin. Conclusions: Our results suggest that an eradication rate of > 85% can be achieved with 14‐day clarithromycin, metronidazole, and amoxicillin and 10‐day clarithromycin, amoxicillin, and omeprazole regimens in Pasto, Colombia. The regimens containing clarithromycin, metronidazole, and amoxicillin appear to be superior to the clarithromycin, amoxicillin, and omeprazole regimen for compliant participants and those with atrophic gastritis. Our findings provide treatment options for a population in a developing country with a high prevalence of H. pylori infections and antibiotic resistance.     

The HOMER Study: the effect of increasing the dose of metronidazole when given with omeprazole and amoxicillin to cure Helicobacter pylori infection

Background. Helicobacter pylori eradication with omeprazole, amoxycillin, and metronidazole is both effective and inexpensive. However, eradication rates with different dosages and dosing vary, and data on the impact of resistance are sparse. In this study, three different dosages of omeprazole, amoxycillin, and metronidazole were compared, and the influence of metronidazole resistance on eradication was assessed. Methods. Patients (n = 394) with a positive H. pylori screening test result and endoscopy‐proven duodenal ulcer in the past were enrolled into a multicenter study performed in four European countries and Canada. After baseline endoscopy, patients were randomly assigned to treatment for 1 week with either omeprazole, 20 mg twice daily, plus amoxycillin, 1,000 mg twice daily, plus metronidazole, 400 mg twice daily (low M); or omeprazole, 40 mg once daily, plus amoxycillin, 500 mg three times daily, plus metronidazole, 400 mg three times daily (medium M); or omeprazole, 20 mg twice daily, plus amoxycillin, 1,000 mg twice daily, plus metronidazole, 800 mg twice daily (high M). H. pylori status at entry was assessed by a ¹³C urea breath test and a culture. Eradication was defined as two negative ¹³C‐urea breath test results 4 and 8 weeks after therapy. Susceptibility testing using the agar dilution method was performed at entry and in patients with persistent infection after therapy. Results. The eradication rates, in terms of intention to treat (ITT) (population n = 379) (and 95% confidence interval [CI]) were as follows: low M 76% (68%, 84%), medium M 76% (68%, 84%), and high M 83% (75%, 89%). By per‐protocol analysis (population n = 348), the corresponding eradication rates were: low M 81%, medium M 80%, and high M 85%. No H. pylori strains were found to be resistant to amoxycillin. Prestudy resistance of H. pylori strains to metronidazole was found in 72 of 348 (21%) of the cultures at entry (range, 10%–39% in the five countries). The overall eradication rate in prestudy metronidazole‐susceptible strains was 232 of 266 (87%) and, for resistant strains, it was 41 of 70 (57%; p < .001). Within each group, the results were as follows (susceptible/resistant): low M, 85%/54%; medium M, 86%/50%; and high M, 90%/75%. There were no statistically significant differences among the treatment groups. 23 strains susceptible to metronidazole before treatment were recultured after therapy failed; 20 of these had now developed resistance. Conclusions. H. pylori eradication rates were similar (approximately 80%) with all three regimens. Metronidazole resistance reduced efficacy; increasing the dose of metronidazole appeared not to overcome the problem or significantly improve the outcome. Treatment failure was generally associated with either prestudy or acquired metronidazole resistance. These findings are of importance when attempting H. pylori eradication in communities with high levels of metronidazole resistance.     

'Rescue' therapy with rifabutin after multiple Helicobacter pylori treatment failures

Aim. Eradication therapy with proton pump inhibitor, clarithromycin and amoxicillin is extensively used, although it fails in a considerable number of cases. A ‘rescue’ therapy with a quadruple combination of omeprazole, bismuth, tetracycline and metronidazole (or ranitidine bismuth citrate with these same antibiotics) has been recommended, but it still fails in approximately 20% of cases. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a rifabutin‐based regimen in patients with two consecutive H. pylori eradication failures. Patients and Methods. Design: Prospective multicenter study. Patients: Consecutive patients in whom a first eradication trial with omeprazole, clarithromycin and amoxicillin and a second trial with omeprazole, bismuth, tetracycline and metronidazole (three patients) or ranitidine bismuth citrate with these same antibiotics (11 patients) had failed were included. Intervention: A third eradication regimen with rifabutin (150 mg bid), amoxicillin (1 g bid) and omeprazole (20 mg bid) was prescribed for 14 days. All drugs were administered together after breakfast and dinner. Compliance with therapy was determined from the interrogatory and the recovery of empty envelopes of medications. Outcome: H. pylori eradication was defined as a negative ¹³C‐urea breath test 8 weeks after completing therapy. Results. Fourteen patients have been included. Mean age ± SD was 42 ± 11 years, 41% males, peptic ulcer (57%), functional dyspepsia (43%). All patients took all the medications and completed the study protocol. Per‐protocol and intention‐to‐treat eradication was achieved in 11/14 patients (79%; 95% confidence interval = 49–95%). Adverse effects were reported in five patients (36%), and included: abdominal pain (three patients), nausea and vomiting (one patient), and oral candidiasis (one patient); no patient abandoned the treatment due to adverse effects. Conclusion. Rifabutin‐based rescue therapy constitutes an encouraging strategy after multiple previous eradication failures with key antibiotics such as amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole and tetracycline.     

黄连素四联方案补救治疗幽门螺杆菌感染的有效性和安全性

目的:探索黄连素四联方案用于幽门螺杆菌感染根除失败患者补救治疗的有效性及安全性。方法:将经四联方案初次根除治疗失败并自愿接受补救治疗的130例患者按纳入顺序,以1:1的比例分配治疗,随机接受14天黄连素四联(埃索美拉唑20mg+胶体果胶铋200 mg+阿莫西林1000 mg,2/d+黄连素300 mg 3/d)或四环素四联(埃索美拉唑20 mg+胶体果胶铋200 mg+四环素750 mg+呋喃唑酮100 mg,2/d)方案的治疗。所有患者均于治疗14天及治疗结束至少28天后随诊,详细记录患者症状及不良反应情况。治疗结束至少28天后进行13C尿素呼气试验来判断幽门螺杆菌根除情况。结果:65例接受黄连素四联根除治疗,65例接受四环素四联方案治疗。两组分别有6例和4例患者因不良反应服药依从性小于80%,其余患者均完成了14天的治疗。黄连素组和四环素组的幽门螺杆菌根除率ITT分析分别为76.9%(50/65)和81.5%(53/65),P=0.520;PP分析分别为84.7%(50/59)和86.9%(53/61),P=0.739。黄连素组和四环素组不良事件总体发生率分别为49.2%和41.5%,P=0.370。结论:黄连素四联疗法用于幽门螺杆菌感染的二次根除治疗,根除率较高,未明显增加不良事件发生率,是有效及安全的补救治疗方案。     

Comparison of lafutidine and rabeprazole in 7-day second-line amoxicillin- and metronidazole-containing triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori: a pilot study

Background: Lafutidine is an H2‐receptor antagonist with gastroprotective action through capsaicin‐sensitive afferent neurons and relatively inexpensive compare to proton‐pump inhibitors (PPIs). A 7‐day course of PPIs–amoxicillin–metronidazole is recommended as standard second‐line Helicobacter pylori therapy and is covered by national health insurance in Japan. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of second‐line eradication using the H2‐receptor antagonist lafutidine as a substitute for a PPI. Materials and Methods: Fifty‐two patients who failed in first‐line eradication using PPI–amoxicillin–clarithromycin were randomly assigned to a 7‐day course of rabeprazole at 10 mg b.i.d., amoxicillin at 750 mg b.i.d., and metronidazole at 250 mg b.i.d. (RPZ‐AM) or a 7‐day course of lafutidine at 10 mg t.i.d., amoxicillin at 750 mg b.i.d., and metronidazole at 250 mg b.i.d. (LFT‐AM) as second‐line therapy. Eradication was assessed by the ¹³C urea breath test. A drug susceptibility test was performed before the second‐line therapy. Results: Prior to second‐line H. pylori eradication, the rate of resistance to clarithromycin was 86.5% and the rate of resistance to metronidazole was 3.8%. The eradication rates for both LFT‐AM and RPZ‐AM groups were 96% (95%CI = 88.6–100%). There were no severe adverse events in either group. Conclusions: Lafutidine plus metronidazole–amoxicillin as second‐line therapy provided a high eradication rate and safe treatment similar to a PPI‐based regimen. Lafutidine‐based eradication therapy is therefore considered to be a promising alternative and is also expected to reduce health care costs in H. pylori eradication.     

Twice-a-day bismuth-containing quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a randomized trial of 10 and 14 days

Background: Bismuth‐containing quadruple therapy given twice a day for 14 days has been shown to be an excellent first‐line H. pylori eradication therapy. Aim: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of twice‐a‐day bismuth‐containing quadruple H. pylori eradication therapy for 10 versus 14 days in a noninferiority trial. Methods: Dyspeptic patients with H. pylori infection and naïve to H. pylori treatment were randomly assigned to: pantoprazole 20 mg, tetracycline 500 mg, metronidazole 500 mg, and bismuth subcitrate caplets 240 mg given b.i.d. (with the midday and evening meals) for 10 or 14 days. Eradication was defined by negative UBT and/or histology 4–6 weeks posttherapy. Efficacy and side effects were determined. Results: A total of 417 patients were randomized (153 men, 264 women; median age 52). Per protocol (PP) treatment success with 14 and 10 days was essentially identical [i.e., 96% (95% CI: 92–98) vs 95% (95% CI: 91–98) for 14 days versus 10 days, respectively. Results with intention‐to‐treat (ITT) analysis were also similar (92% (95% CI, 87–95) vs 92% (95% CI, 88–96)) for 14 and 10 days, respectively. Compliance was excellent in both groups. Side effects were generally mild and similar between groups. Fatigue, discomfort, and vomiting were more common in those in the 14‐day group. The 10‐day regimen costs € 17.65 (ie, approximately 25%) less than the 14‐day regimen. Conclusions: Bismuth‐containing quadruple therapy remained highly effective (i.e., ≥95% PP and >90% ITT) despite reducing the duration from 14 to 10 days.     

High eradication rates of Helicobacter pylori infection following sequential therapy: the Israeli experience treating naïve patients

Background: Helicobacter pylori eradication rates following triple therapy are decreasing. Cure rates as low as 57%, mainly to claritromycin resistance, have been reported in Israel. Studies performed in Italy have shown eradication rates of 93%, following sequential therapy. Our aim was to evaluate the effect of sequential therapy on eradication rates of H. pylori in naïve Israeli patients. Material and Methods: Consecutive patients referred for esophagogastroduodenoscopy with a positive rapid urease test and positive ¹³C urea breath test were included. Patients received omeprazole 20 mg bid and amoxicillin 1 g bid for 5 days followed by omeprazole 20 mg bid, clarithromycin 500 mg bid and tinidazole 500 mg bid for the subsequent 5 days. A second ¹³C urea breath test was performed at least 4 weeks after completion of therapy. Patients were asked to avoid antibiotics, bismuth compounds or proton pump inhibitor until after the second ¹³C urea breath test. Adverse effects were documented by a questionnaire. Results: One hundred and twenty‐four patients (mean age 56.1 ± 12.5 years, 55.6% women) were included; 120/124 (96.8%) completed treatment and performed the second ¹³C urea breath test. Two patients (1.6%) were lost to follow‐up; 2 (1.6%) were noncompliant with study regulations. One hundred and fifteen patients achieved eradication of H. pylori. The eradication rate was 95.8% by per protocol analysis and 92.7% by intention to treat analysis. Conclusion: The sequential regimen attained significantly higher eradication rates in naïve patients than usually reported for conventional triple therapy. Sequential therapy may be an alternative first‐line therapy in eradicating H. pylori in Israel.     

Low efficacy of clarithromycin including sequential regimens for Helicobacter pylori infection

Background: Sequential treatment for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) appears to achieve a better eradication rate than triple therapy. However, most of the data have been reported from the Italy, and studies from different population are needed before it is recommended in clinical practice. The present study aimed to assess and compare the efficacy of two separate clarithromycin including sequential regimens in Turkey which is well known with high clarithromycin and metronidazole resistance to H. pylori. Methods: Consecutive H. pylori ‐positive patients with non‐ulcer dyspepsia were randomly allocated to one of the two sequential regimens; the first group was given lansoprazole 30 mg b.i.d. plus amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d. for the first week, followed by lansoprazole 30 mg b.i.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d., and metronidazole 500 mg t.i.d. for the second week (LA‐CM). The second arm was given the same regimen but tetracycline500 g q.i.d. instead of metronidazole (LA‐CT). H. pylori was detected with urea breath test (UBT) and histology before enrollment. UBT was repeated at 6th weeks after treatment. Results: A total of 200 patients were enrolled in groups and 179 of them completed their protocols. The cumulative per protocol (“PP”) and intention‐to‐treat (“ITT”) eradication rates were 74.3% and 66.5% in all patients, respectively. Both “PP” (78.2% vs 70.1%) and “ITT” (72% vs 61%) eradication rates were better in LA‐CT group than LA‐CM group, but the differences were not statistically significant (p > .05). Both regimens were well tolerated, and the incidence of adverse effects was comparable. Conclusion: Two weeks clarithromycin including sequential regimens with metronidazole or tetracycline were not achieved acceptable eradication rates in Turkey.     

Open, randomized multicenter comparative trial of rabeprazole, ofloxacin and amoxicillin therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: 7 vs. 14 day treatment

BACKGROUND: Because of the increasing resistance to clarithromycin and metronidazole, two of the antibiotics used for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori, new therapeutic alternatives are needed. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of a randomized, comparative trial of 7 vs. 14-day triple treatment with rabeprazole, ofloxacin and amoxicillin for H. pylori eradication. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The present authors studied 76 dyspeptic patients infected with H. pylori diagnosed by both histology and a rapid urease test. Patients were randomized to receive rabeprazole (20 mg b.i.d.), plus ofloxacin (400 mg b.i.d.) and amoxicillin (1000 mg b.i.d.) for 7 days (group 1) vs. 14 days (group 2) and were followed by 6 weeks. Eradication was assessed 4 weeks after completing the course of study treatment by the (14)C-urea breath test. Per protocol and intention-to-treat eradication rates were determined. RESULTS: For the intention to treat analysis, the eradication rate was 62.2% for group 1 and 92.3% for group 2 (p =.004). For the per protocol analysis, eradication rate for group 1 was 63.9% and for group 2 was 97.3% (p =.001). CONCLUSIONS: Triple therapy with rabeprazole, amoxicillin and ofloxacin by 14 days was efficient for H. pylori eradication and therefore deserves further study. The same regimen prescribed for 7 days had a significantly lower and unacceptable cure rate and should not be used.     

Comparison of One or Two Weeks of Lansoprazole, Amoxicillin, and Clarithromycin in the Treatment of Helicobacter pylori

Background The simplest, most effective, and least expensive Helicobacter pylori therapy remains to be determined. Two weeks of 30 mg lansoprazole bid, 1 gm amoxicillin bid, and 500 mg clarithromycin bid (LAC2) had been shown to be an effective therapy for H. pylori. The aim of this study was to assess whether 1 week of this regimen (LAC1) would have a similar efficacy.
Materials and Methods. H. pylori -positive patients assessed histologically, by rapid urease test, microbiologically, and by a ¹³C-urea breath test (¹³C-UBT) were randomized to receive either LAC1 or LAC2 in a single-center open study. Patients were interviewed 1 to 3 days after completion of therapy to evaluate adverse events and compliance. Efficacy was determined by ¹³C-UBT at least 4 weeks after antibiotic therapy.
Results. Seventy evaluable patients were randomized to receive LAC1 (n = 33) and LAC2 (n = 37). Of the 33 LAC1 patients, 30 (91%) were treated successfully (95% confidence interval (CI) = 76–98%), compared with 32 of 37 (86%) in the LAC2 group (95% CI = 71–96%). There was no difference in efficacy between the two groups (Fisher's exact test p = 1.0; 95% CI =–10.3%–19.2%). Patients taking LAC1 experienced significantly fewer severe adverse events than those taking LAC2 (Mann-Whitney U test). One of 64 patients had primary resistance to clarithromycin, and treatment was unsuccessful in this case. Six of the 7 remaining treatment failures developed secondary resistance to clarithromycin.
Conclusions. LAC1 is as effective as LAC2 and is associated with less toxicity. Posttreatment clarithromycin resistance is common in patients who do not experience success with therapy.