iTRAQ技术及其在蛋白质组学中的应用

近年来随着蛋白质组学的迅速发展,其相应的方法学研究也取得了巨大的进步, 一系列新技术融入了蛋白质组学研究中,极大地促进了这门学科的发展.相对和绝对定量同位素标记(iTRAQ)技术与高度敏感性和准确性的串联质谱及多维液相色谱联用技术已成为蛋白质定性和定量研究的主要工具之一. 该技术可对复杂样本、细胞器、细 胞裂解液等样本进行相对和绝对定量研究,具有较好的定量效果、较高的重复性.由于其能够同时对多达8种样品进行标记分析,故在生命科学的各个领域得到了广泛的应用.本文对iTRAQ的原理、实验流程、优缺点及近几年的应用进展进行综述.     

稳定同位素标记试剂DiART在蛋白质组中的定量特征研究

等重同位素标记方法,如同位素标记相对和绝对定量(iTRAQ),可以对肽段进行化学标记,之后通过质谱分析得到的报告离子的强度信息而实现对肽段的定量.目前,这种标记技术在定量蛋白质组学研究中有广泛应用.DiART也是一种等重同位素标记方法,且与iTRAQ的定量原理类似,但是其化学结构组成与iTRAQ有所不同,因而其定量特征有其独特表现.本研究通过对DiART标记的简单蛋白样品、复杂蛋白样品以及复杂样品中目标蛋白的定量情况进行了分析,从而对DiART的定量特征进行了研究,并同时与iTRAQ进行了比较.结果表明,DiART方法在定量稳定性、准确性及动态范围方面均更具优势.     

iTRAQ技术在医药领域的研究进展

蛋白质组学的研究是生命科学进入后基因时代的特征,是探索生命奥秘的有效手段,相关的实验技术已被广泛应用于各个领域。传统的蛋白组学技术包括凝胶电泳、质谱分析、蛋白质芯片等,但由于这些技术存在灵敏度低、操作繁琐、可重复性差等缺点已无法适应当今蛋白质研究的需要;这就促使了蛋白组学技术的改进和革新。同位素标记的相对和绝对定量(iTRAQ)技术是目前进行蛋白定性定量常用的、发展较快的新技术,该技术灵敏度高、准确率和可重复性好,能够同时检测多个样本,并且对样本进行精准高效的分析。文章梳理了iTRAQ技术的优缺点,对该技术近几年在医药基础和临床研究应用的情况进行整理和分析,探讨该技术在医药领域的应用前景。     

高精度相对和绝对定量的等量异位标签在定量蛋白质组学研究中的新进展

蛋白质组学逐渐从定性研究转向定量研究。在定量蛋白质组学技术中,相对和绝对定量的等量异位标签(Isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation,iTRAQ)是应用最广泛的技术之一,具有通量高、稳定性强及不受样品来源制约等优点,几乎可以对任意样品进行标记,而且可以同时对多达8个样品进行定量分析,有效地提高了通量。iTRAQ技术不断改进,其定量准确性显著提高,适用的平台越来越多,为微生物、动物、植物、生物医学领域蛋白质及其翻译后修饰组研究创造了条件。文中综述了高精度iTRAQ技术在定量蛋白质组学研究中的最新发展及其应用。     

电针干预慢性炎性痛的杏仁核潜在蛋白筛选

目的 本研究旨在对完全弗氏佐剂(complete Freund's adjuvant,CFA)诱导的慢性疼痛大鼠的杏仁核进行同位素标记的相对和绝对定量(isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation,iTRAQ)蛋白质组学分析,并对蛋白质表达进行综合分析,以探讨...     

植物蛋白质组学研究若干重要进展

植物蛋白质组学近年来正从定性向精确定量蛋白质组学的方向发展。国际上近两年发表的约160篇研究论文报道了利用不断改进的双向电泳结合生物质谱技术、多维蛋白质鉴定技术,以及包括双向荧光差异凝胶电泳、幅N体内代谢标记、同位素标记的亲和标签、同位素标记相对和绝对定量等在内的第2代蛋白质组学技术,对植物组织（器官）与细胞器、植物发育过程和植物响应环境胁迫的蛋白质组特征,以及植物蛋白质翻译后修饰和蛋白质相互作用等方面的研究成果。该文对上述报道进行总结,综述了2007年以来植物蛋白质组学若干重要问题研究的新进展。     

iTRAQ技术在真菌研究中的应用进展

iTRAQ技术是一种新的、功能强大的、可以最多同时比较8种不同样品中蛋白质相对或绝对含量的蛋白质组学方法,结合多维液相色谱和串联质谱分析,iTRAQ技术已成为差异蛋白质组学定量研究的主要工具之一。而真菌的致病作用是多种蛋白质共同参与的真菌?宿主相互作用的复杂过程,因此整体、定量地分析真菌致病过程中的差异表达蛋白质谱,对于研究真菌的致病机制具有重要作用。该文重点就iTRAQ技术在真菌研究中的应用进展进行综述。     

同位素标记相对和绝对定量蛋白组技术研究进展

近年来定量蛋白组学技术迅速发展,目前常用的有双向荧光差异凝胶电泳、同位素亲和标记、15N同位素标记、同位素标记相对和绝对定量和细胞培养条件下稳定同位素标记技术等。同位素标记相对和绝对定量技术以其高通量、高灵敏度、高重复性、高动态检测限和能对各种复杂样品进行相对和绝对定量研究等优势而备受研究者青睐,目前已发展到在同一实验中分析8组样品,增加了实验设计的灵活性。我们就同位素标记相对和绝对定量技术在定量蛋白组史中的地位作用、研究策略,以及在病毒致病机制研究和医药临床相关问题中的应用做简要综述。     

植物蛋白质组学研究若干重要进展

植物蛋白质组学近年来正从定性向精确定量蛋白质组学的方向发展。国际上近两年发表的约160篇研究论文报道了利用不断改进的双向电泳结合生物质谱技术、多维蛋白质鉴定技术, 以及包括双向荧光差异凝胶电泳、15N体内代谢标记、同位素标记的亲和标签、同位素标记相对和绝对定量等在内的第2代蛋白质组学技术, 对植物组织(器官)与细胞器、植物发育过程和植物响应环境胁迫的蛋白质组特征, 以及植物蛋白质翻译后修饰和蛋白质相互作用等方面的研究成果。该文对上述报道进行总结, 综述了2007年以来植物蛋白质组学若干重要问题研究的新进展。     

同位素稀释法在绝对定量蛋白质组中的研究进展

绝对定量蛋白质组是指基于蛋白质组学方法对细胞、组织或体液中的蛋白质进行绝对量或浓度测定．目前,常用的绝对定量方法主要有基于同位素稀释法的蛋白质组学绝对定量方法和基于质谱数据统计分析的非标记方法．基于同位素稀释法的绝对定量方法是用已知量的同位素标记物对与其混合的样本蛋白质浓度进行测定．常见的同位素标记物包括：由AQUA法、QconCAT法产生的特异性水解肽段,由PSAQ法、Absolute SILAC法产生的标记蛋白和由PrESTs-SILAC法产生的蛋白抗原表位标签．由于同位素稀释法可以对蛋白质进行准确和精确定量,对于临床疾病的诊断和治疗具有明显的现实意义．本文对同位素稀释法在绝对定量蛋白质组中的研究进展及其优缺点和最新应用进行了评述．     

Isobaric Labeling and Data Normalization without Requiring Protein Quantitation

Isobaric multiplexed quantitative proteomics can complement high-resolution sample isolation techniques. Here, we report a simple workflow exponentially modified protein abundance index (emPAI)-MW deconvolution (EMMOL) for normalizing isobaric reporter ratios within and between experiments, where small or unknown amounts of protein are used. EMMOL deconvolutes the isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification (iTRAQ) data to yield the quantity of each protein of each sample in the pool, a new approach that enables the comparison of many samples without including a channel of reference standard. Moreover, EMMOL allows using a sufficient quantity of control sample to facilitate the peptide fractionation (isoelectric-focusing was used in this report), and mass spectrometry MS/MS sequencing yet relies on the broad dynamic range of iTRAQ quantitation to compare relative protein abundance. We demonstrated EMMOL by comparing four pooled samples with 20-fold range differences in protein abundance and performed data normalization without using prior knowledge of the amounts of proteins in each sample, simulating an iTRAQ experiment without protein quantitation prior to labeling. We used emPAI,¹ the target protein MW, and the iTRAQ reporter ratios to calculate the amount of each protein in each of the four channels. Importantly, the EMMOL-delineated proteomes from separate iTRAQ experiments can be assorted for comparison without using a reference sample. We observed no compression of expression in iTRAQ ratios over a 20-fold range for all protein abundances. To complement this ability to analyze minute samples, we report an optimized iTRAQ labeling protocol for using 5 μg protein as the starting material.     

热CO2气腹处理后结肠癌细胞株COLO 205的蛋白组学变化

目的:研究热CO₂气腹处理后结肠癌细胞株COLO 205的蛋白组学变化,为阐明热CO₂气腹对结肠癌细胞的杀伤作用机制提供依据。方法:用热CO₂气腹处理结肠癌细胞株COLO 205,按有无处理分为处理组与对照组。分别抽提两组细胞的总蛋白质,采用同位素标记的相对和绝对定量（isobaric tags for relative absolute quantitation,iTRAQ）技术标记,液相色谱（LC）分离蛋白质,质谱仪（MS）进行蛋白质鉴定及Western b1ot检测。结果:共筛选得到18个差异表达的蛋白,其中8个蛋白表达上调,10个蛋白表达下调。Western blot显示热休克蛋白HSP70在细胞表达明显高于对照组（P<0.01）;蛋白Myosin-9的表达量在处理后显著下降。结论:热CO₂气腹处理后结肠癌细胞株COLO 205的蛋白组学发生差异性变化。     

Isobaric protein and peptide quantification: perspectives and issues

An important challenge for proteomics is the ability to compare protein levels across biological samples. Since their introduction, isotopic and isobaric peptide labeling have played an important role in relative quantitative comparisons of proteomes. One important drawback of most of the isotopic-labeling techniques is an increase in sample complexity. This problem was successfully addressed with the construction of isobaric labeling strategies, such as isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantification (iTRAQ), tandem mass tagging, the cleavable isobaric affinity tag, dimethylated leucines and isobaric peptide termini labeling. Furthermore, numerous applications for multiplexing using iTRAQ and tandem mass tagging have been reported.     

Isobaric protein and peptide quantification: perspectives and issues

An important challenge for proteomics is the ability to compare protein levels across biological samples. Since their introduction, isotopic and isobaric peptide labeling have played an important role in relative quantitative comparisons of proteomes. One important drawback of most of the isotopic-labeling techniques is an increase in sample complexity. This problem was successfully addressed with the construction of isobaric labeling strategies, such as isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantification (iTRAQ), tandem mass tagging, the cleavable isobaric affinity tag, dimethylated leucines and isobaric peptide termini labeling. Furthermore, numerous applications for multiplexing using iTRAQ and tandem mass tagging have been reported.     

Gel-free and gel-based proteomics in Bacillus subtilis: a comparative study

The proteome of exponentially growing Bacillus subtilis cells was dissected by the implementation of shotgun proteomics and a semigel-based approach for a particular exploration of membrane proteins. The current number of 745 protein identifications that was gained by the use of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis could be increased by 473 additional proteins. Therefore, almost 50% of the 2500 genes expressed in growing B. subtilis cells have been demonstrated at the protein level. In terms of exploring cellular physiology and adaptation to environmental changes or stress, proteins showing an alteration in expression level are of primary interest. The large number of vegetative proteins identified by gel-based and gel-free approaches is a good starting point for comparative physiological investigations. For this reason a gel-free quantitation with the recently introduced iTRAQ (isobaric tagging for relative and absolute quantitation) reagent technique was performed to investigate the heat shock response in B. subtilis. A comparison with gel-based data showed that both techniques revealed a similar level of up-regulation for proteins belonging to well studied heat hock regulons (SigB, HrcA, and CtsR). However, additional datasets have been obtained by the gel-free approach indicating a strong heat sensitivity of specific enzymes involved in amino acid synthesis.     

Comparative study of three proteomic quantitative methods, DIGE, cICAT, and iTRAQ, using 2D gel- or LC-MALDI TOF/TOF

A comparative study on the three quantitative methods frequently used in proteomics, 2D DIGE (difference gel electrophoresis), cICAT (cleavable isotope-coded affinity tags) and iTRAQ (isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification), was carried out. DIGE and cICAT are familiar techniques used in gel- and LC-based quantitative proteomics, respectively. iTRAQ is a new LC-based technique which is gradually gaining in popularity. A systematic comparison among these quantitative methods has not been reported. In this study, we conducted well-designed comparisons using a six-protein mixture, a reconstituted protein mixture (BSA spiked into human plasma devoid of six abundant proteins), and complex HCT-116 cell lysates as the samples. All three techniques yielded quantitative results with reasonable accuracy when the six-protein or the reconstituted protein mixture was used. In DIGE, accurate quantification was sometimes compromised due to comigration or partial comigration of proteins. The iTRAQ method is more susceptible to errors in precursor ion isolation, which could be manifested with increasing sample complexity. The quantification sensitivity of each method was estimated by the number of peptides detected for each protein. In this regard, the global-tagging iTRAQ technique was more sensitive than the cysteine-specific cICAT method, which in turn was as sensitive as, if not more sensitive than, the DIGE technique. Protein profiling on HCT-116 and HCT-116 p53 -/- cell lysates displayed limited overlapping among proteins identified by the three methods, suggesting the complementary nature of these methods.     

Amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents: requirements for absolute quantification of proteins and peptides

Amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents such as iTRAQ (isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation) have recently become increasing popular for relative protein quantification, cell expression profiling, and biomarker discovery. This is due mainly to the possibility of simultaneously identifying and quantifying multiple samples. The principles of iTRAQ may also be applied to absolute protein quantification with the use of synthetic peptides as standards. The prerequisites that must be fulfilled to perform absolute quantification of proteins by iTRAQ have been investigated and are described here. Three samples of somatropin were quantified using iTRAQ and synthetic peptides as standards, corresponding to a portion of the protein sequence. The results were compared with those obtained by quantification of the same protein solutions using double exact matching isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS). To obtain reliable results, the appropriate standard peptides needed to be selected carefully and enzymatic digestion needed to be optimized to ensure complete release of the peptides from the protein. The kinetics and efficiency of the iTRAQ derivatization reaction of the standard peptides and digested proteins with isobaric tagging reagents were studied using a mixture of seven synthetic peptides and their corresponding labeled peptides. The implications of incomplete derivatization are also presented.