Suppression of cytokine signaling: The SOCS perspective

The discovery of the Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling (SOCS) family of proteins has resulted in a significant body of research dedicated to dissecting their biological functions and the molecular mechanisms by which they achieve potent and specific inhibition of cytokine and growth factor signaling. The Australian contribution to this field has been substantial, with the initial discovery of SOCS1 by Hilton, Starr and colleagues (discovered concurrently by two other groups) and the following work, providing a new perspective on the regulation of JAK/STAT signaling. In this review, we reflect on the critical discoveries that have lead to our current understanding of how SOCS proteins function and discuss what we see as important questions for future research.     

Human primary keratinocytes show restricted ability to up-regulate suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS)3 protein compared with autologous macrophages

Suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS)3 belongs to a family of proteins that are known to exert important functions as inducible feedback inhibitors and are crucial for the balance of immune responses. There is evidence for a deregulated immune response in chronic inflammatory skin diseases. Thus, it was the aim of this study to investigate the regulation of SOCS proteins involved in intracellular signaling pathways occurring during inflammatory skin diseases and analyze their impact on the course of inflammatory responses. Because we and others have previously described that the cytokine IL-27 has an important impact on the chronic manifestation of inflammatory skin diseases, we focused here on the signaling induced by IL-27 in human primary keratinocytes compared with autologous blood-derived macrophages. Here, we demonstrate that SOCS3 is critically involved in regulating the cell-specific response to IL-27. SOCS3 was found to be significantly up-regulated by IL-27 in macrophages but not in keratinocytes. Other STAT3-activating cytokines investigated, including IL-6, IL-22, and oncostatin M, also failed to up-regulate SOCS3 in keratinocytes. Lack of SOCS3 up-regulation in skin epithelial cells was accompanied by prolonged STAT1 and STAT3 phosphorylation and enhanced CXCL10 production upon IL-27 stimulation compared with macrophages. Overexpression of SOCS3 in keratinocytes significantly diminished this enhanced CXCL10 production in response to IL-27. We conclude from our data that keratinocytes have a cell type-specific impaired capacity to up-regulate SOCS3 which may crucially determine the course of chronic inflammatory skin diseases.     

Suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS) 1 inhibits type I interferon (IFN) signaling via the interferon alpha receptor (IFNAR1)-associated tyrosine kinase Tyk2

Type I IFNs are critical players in host innate and adaptive immunity. IFN signaling is tightly controlled to ensure appropriate immune responses as imbalance could result in uncontrolled inflammation or inadequate responses to infection. It is therefore important to understand how type I IFN signaling is regulated. Here we have investigated the mechanism by which suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 (SOCS1) inhibits type I IFN signaling. We have found that SOCS1 inhibits type I IFN signaling not via a direct interaction with the IFN α receptor 1 (IFNAR1) receptor component but through an interaction with the IFNAR1-associated kinase Tyk2. We have characterized the residues/regions involved in the interaction between SOCS1 and Tyk2 and found that SOCS1 associates via its SH2 domain with conserved phosphotyrosines 1054 and 1055 of Tyk2. The kinase inhibitory region of SOCS1 is also essential for its interaction with Tyk2 and inhibition of IFN signaling. We also found that Tyk2 is preferentially Lys-63 polyubiquitinated and that this activation reaction is inhibited by SOCS1. The consequent effect of SOCS1 inhibition of Tyk2 not only results in a reduced IFN response because of inhibition of Tyk2 kinase-mediated STAT signaling but also negatively impacts IFNAR1 surface expression, which is stabilized by Tyk2.     

Suppressor of cytokine signaling 6 in cancer development and therapy: Deciphering its emerging and suppressive roles

The suppressor of cytokine signaling 6 (SOCS6), an emerged important member of SOCS family, has attracted enhancing attention regarding its pivotal role in the development and progression of cancers. As part of negative feedback regulation, SOCS6 has been implicated in attenuating cytokine signal transduction via inhibiting the signaling cascade of activated cytokine receptors and multiple receptor tyrosine kinase signaling. Decreased SOCS6 expression is involved in diverse tumorigenic processes, such as abnormal cell proliferation, evasion of apoptosis, cancer migration, and cancer stem cell maintenance. Herein, this review summarized the mechanisms of SOCS6 regulation underlying multiple pathways. In particular, we focus on the pathological processes of cancer targeted by SOCS6 and discuss its inhibitory role during tumor progression. Also, we focused on the clinical relevance of SOCS6 in cancer biomarker and prognosis, as well as its significance in chemoresistance and radioresistance. In all, this review pave a way to assist in experimental designs and emphasize the potential clinical value of SOCS6 for cancer.     

Prerequisites for Functional Interleukin 31 Signaling and Its Feedback Regulation by Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling 3 (SOCS3)

Interleukin-31 (IL-31) is a T helper type 2 cell-derived cytokine tightly associated with inflammatory skin disorders. IL-31-induced signaling is mediated by a receptor complex composed of oncostatin M receptor β and the cytokine-specific receptor subunit IL-31Rα, of which there are several isoforms. The latter can be classified as long or short isoforms with respect to their intracellular domain. At present, the signaling capabilities of the different isoforms remain inchoately understood, and potential mechanisms involved in negative regulation of IL-31Rα signaling have so far not been studied in detail. Here, we show that both the long and short isoforms of IL-31Rα are capable of inducing STAT signaling. However, the presence of a functional JAK-binding box within IL-31Rα is an essential prerequisite for functional IL-31-mediated STAT3 signaling. Moreover, both the long and short isoforms require oncostatin M receptor β for their activity. We also show that IL-31 induces expression of four suppressor of cytokine signaling family members and provide evidence that SOCS3 acts as a potent feedback inhibitor of IL-31-induced signaling. Taken together, this study identifies crucial requirements for IL-31 signaling and shows its counter-regulation by SOCS3.     

Structural basis for c-KIT inhibition by the suppressor of cytokine signaling 6 (SOCS6) ubiquitin ligase

The c-KIT receptor tyrosine kinase mediates the cellular response to stem cell factor (SCF). Whereas c-KIT activity is important for the proliferation of hematopoietic cells, melanocytes and germ cells, uncontrolled c-KIT activity contributes to the growth of diverse human tumors. Suppressor of cytokine signaling 6 (SOCS6) is a member of the SOCS family of E3 ubiquitin ligases that can interact with c-KIT and suppress c-KIT-dependent pathways. Here, we analyzed the molecular mechanisms that determine SOCS6 substrate recognition. Our results show that the SH2 domain of SOCS6 is essential for its interaction with c-KIT pY568. The 1.45-Å crystal structure of SOCS6 SH2 domain bound to the c-KIT substrate peptide (c-KIT residues 564–574) revealed a highly complementary and specific interface giving rise to a high affinity interaction (K_d = 0.3 μm). Interestingly, the SH2 binding pocket extends to substrate residue position pY+6 and envelopes the c-KIT phosphopeptide with a large BG loop insertion that contributes significantly to substrate interaction. We demonstrate that SOCS6 has ubiquitin ligase activity toward c-KIT and regulates c-KIT protein turnover in cells. Our data support a role of SOCS6 as a feedback inhibitor of SCF-dependent signaling and provides molecular data to account for target specificity within the SOCS family of ubiquitin ligases.     

PML control of cytokine signaling

The promyelocytic leukemia (PML) protein is a tumor suppressor acting as the organizer of nuclear matrix-associated structures named nuclear bodies (NBs). The involvement of PML in various cell processes, including cell death, senescence or antiviral defense underlines the multiple functions of PML due to its ability to interact with various partners either in the cytoplasm or in the nucleus. The importance of paracrine signaling in the regulation of PML expression is well established. More recently, a growing body of evidence also supports PML as a key regulator of cytokine signaling. These findings shed light on unsuspected biological functions of PML such as immune response, inflammation and cytokine-induced apoptosis. Here we review the current understanding of the pleiotropic activities of PML on cytokine-induced signaling.     

Increased cytoplasmic levels of CIS, SOCS1, SOCS2, or SOCS3 are required for nuclear translocation

We investigated the cellular localization of ectopically-expressed CIS, SOCS1, SOCS2 and SOCS3 proteins. We found that SOCS proteins localize to the nucleus where they reduce Stat3 proteins and that the presence of proteasome inhibitors increased SOCS nuclear localization. Our results indicate that increased nuclear localization resulted from increased levels of SOCS proteins in the cytoplasm. Finally, we demonstrate that the same effect occurs with endogenously-expressed SOCS proteins. These observations suggest that increased cytoplasmic levels of proteins in the SOCS family are regulated through nuclear translocation.     

Suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 suppresses muscle differentiation through modulation of IGF-I receptor signal transduction

Suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS) 1 was initially identified as an intracellular negative feedback regulator of the JAK-STAT signal pathway. Recently, it has been suggested that SOCS1 affects signals of growth factors and hormones. One of them, SOCS1, is also known to be involved in auto-regulation of IRS-1-mediated signaling. However, the mechanism(s) of SOCS1 induction by insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and a role of SOCS1 on IGF-I receptor-mediated signaling are not clarified. Here, we investigate SOCS1 on muscle differentiation. We found that muscle differentiation was suppressed in SOCS1 stable transformant C2C12 myoblasts, while it was promoted in SOCS1-deficient myoblasts. Additionally, SOCS1 augmented MEK phosphorylation and reduced Akt phosphorylation induced by IGF-I. Then, SOCS1 stable transformant C2C12 myoblasts, infected with adenovirus bearing constitutively active Akt, have the ability to differentiate again. Collectively, these findings suggest that SOCS1 suppresses muscle differentiation through negative feedback regulation of IGF-I receptor-mediated signaling.     

Suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 in the human hypothalamus

In rodents, the mediobasal hypothalamus and the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN) are implicated in leptin signaling. Surprisingly little data is available on the human hypothalamus. We set out to study the expression of suppressor-of-cytokine-signaling 3 (SOCS3), α-melanocyte stimulating hormone (αMSH) and agouti-related protein (AgRP) in the infundibular nucleus (IFN) and to investigate the relationship between these neuropeptide expressions and serum leptin concentrations in a blood sample taken within 24h before death. We studied post-mortem human brain material by means of quantitative immunocytochemistry. We found that SOCS3 immunoreactivity was widely distributed throughout the hypothalamus, and most prominent in the PVN, whereas expression levels in the IFN were low. Surprisingly, SOCS3 expression in the PVN was inversely related to serum leptin. A significant positive correlation was observed between AgRP and NPY expression in the IFN. The inverse correlation between SOCS3 expression in the PVN and serum leptin was unexpected and may be related to the hypothalamic adaptation to fatal illness rather than to nutritional status, or may represent an interspecies difference.