Identification and complete cDNA sequence of the missing Drosophila MCMs: DmMCM3, DmMCM6 and DmMCM7

The minichromosome maintenance (MCM) gene family consists of six members (MCM2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae as well as in humans. Each family member plays an essential role in the replication of DNA. In Drosophila melanogaster only three members, DmMCM2, DmMCM4/dpa and DmMCM5/DmCDC46, have been studied. In addition, two other partial sequences were recently reported. Using degenerate primers and low stringency PCR conditions six different DNA sequences were identified with highest sequence similarity to MCM2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7. Sequence analysis of full length cDNA clones corresponding to the MCM3, 6 and 7 fragment proves the existence of six MCM genes in Drosophila melanogaster. Strong homology to the human counterparts, mRNA expression analysis and physico-chemical properties suggest a conserved function in DNA replication for DmMCM3, 6 and 7.     

The noncatalytic C-terminus of AtPOLK Y-family DNA polymerase affects synthesis fidelity, mismatch extension and translesion replication

Cell survival depends not only on the ability to repair damaged DNA but also on the capability to perform DNA replication on unrepaired or imperfect templates. Crucial to this process are specialized DNA polymerases belonging to the Y family. These enzymes share a similar catalytic fold in their N-terminal region, and most of them have a less-well-conserved C-terminus which is not required for catalytic activity. Although this region is essential for appropriate localization and recruitment in vivo, its precise role during DNA synthesis remains unclear. Here we have compared the catalytic properties of AtPOLK, an Arabidopsis orthologue of mammalian pol kappa, and a truncated version lacking 193 amino acids from its C-terminus. We found that C-terminally truncated AtPOLK is a high-efficiency mutant protein, the DNA-binding capacity of which is not affected but it has higher catalytic efficiency and fidelity than the full-length enzyme. The truncated protein shows increased propensity to extend mispaired primer termini through misalignment and enhanced error-free bypass activity on DNA templates containing 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoGuanine. These results suggest that, in addition to facilitating recruitment to the replication fork, the C-terminus of Y-family DNA polymerases may also play a role in the kinetic control of their enzymatic activity.     

Regulated replication of DNA microinjected into eggs of Xenopus laevis

Purified circular DNA of SV40 or polyoma virus has been injected into unfertilized eggs of Xenopus laevis. Injected DNA initiates and completes multiple rounds of semiconservative replication while observing cellular regulatory signals. Thus replication initiation of double-stranded templates is induced after the oocyte is matured in vitro by progesterone. Only one round of replication of injected DNA is observed in a single cell cycle. When protein synthesis is inhibited unreplicated molecules continue to initiate replication at an undiminished rate, but reinitiation on previously replicated molecules is completely and selectively abolished. The DNA sequence requirements for the replication of injected DNA have been investigated. A variety of procaryotic DNA molecules and circularized fragments of SV40 or polyoma DNA replicate, regardless of whether they contain the viral origin of DNA replication. These results suggest that a specialized DNA sequence is not essential for the initiation of semiconservative DNA replication in the Xenopus embryo, nor is a specialized sequence essential for the mechanism which prevents reinitiation on a molecule which has already replicated within a cell cycle. The possibility is discussed that viral origins of replication are not valid models for the eucaryotic chromosome but are adaptations for uncoupling viral replication from the mechanism which prevents reinitiation within a cell cycle.     

PCNA ubiquitination and REV1 define temporally distinct mechanisms for controlling translesion synthesis in the avian cell line DT40

Translesion synthesis (TLS) is a potentially mutagenic method of bypassing DNA damage encountered during replication that requires the recruitment of specialized DNA polymerases to stalled replication forks or postreplicative gaps. Current models suggest that TLS is activated by monoubiquitination of the DNA sliding clamp PCNA. However, in higher organisms, fully effective TLS also requires a noncatalytic function of the Y family polymerase REV1. Using the genetically tractable chicken cell line DT40, we show that TLS at stalled replication forks requires that both the translesion polymerase-interaction domain and ubiquitin-binding domain in the C terminus of REV1 are intact. Surprisingly, however, PCNA ubiquitination is not required to maintain normal fork progression on damaged DNA. Conversely, PCNA ubiquitination is essential for filling postreplicative gaps. Thus, PCNA ubiquitination and REV1 play distinct roles in the coordination of DNA damage bypass that are temporally separated relative to replication fork arrest.     

The Human Specialized DNA Polymerases and Non-B DNA: Vital Relationships to Preserve Genome Integrity

In addition to the canonical right-handed double helix, DNA molecule can adopt several other non-B DNA structures. Readily formed in the genome at specific DNA repetitive sequences, these secondary conformations present a distinctive challenge for progression of DNA replication forks. Impeding normal DNA synthesis, cruciforms, hairpins, H DNA, Z DNA and G4 DNA considerably impact the genome stability and in some instances play a causal role in disease development. Along with previously discovered dedicated DNA helicases, the specialized DNA polymerases emerge as major actors performing DNA synthesis through these distorted impediments. In their new role, they are facilitating DNA synthesis on replication stalling sites formed by non-B DNA structures and thereby helping the completion of DNA replication, a process otherwise crucial for preserving genome integrity and concluding normal cell division. This review summarizes the evidence gathered describing the function of specialized DNA polymerases in replicating DNA through non-B DNA structures.     

DNA polymerases β and λ and their roles in DNA replication and repair

DNA-dependent DNA polymerases are the main enzymes that catalyze DNA replication. Higher eukaryotic cells have 19 DNA polymerases with strikingly different properties [1]. Mitochondrial DNA polymerase γ of the A family and most of the nuclear enzymes of the B family are high-fidelity DNA polymerases that are involved not only in genomic DNA replication but also in DNA repair. Among the other 15 proteins, DNA polymerases belonging to the X and Y families have a special place. The majority of these enzymes are also involved in repair, including base excision repair and nonhomologous end joining. Some of them play a specific role in replication of damaged DNA templates. This process is referred to as translesion synthesis (TLS). DNA polymerases β and λ, which belong to the X structural family, are polyfunctional enzymes; their properties and functions are discussed.     

Cloning and Characterization of peter pan, a Novel Drosophila Gene Required for Larval Growth

We identified a new Drosophila gene, peter pan (ppan), in a screen for larval growth-defective mutants. ppan mutant larvae do not grow and show minimal DNA replication but can survive until well after their heterozygotic siblings have pupariated. We cloned the ppan gene by P-element plasmid rescue. ppan belongs to a highly conserved gene family that includes Saccharomyces cerevisiae SSF1 and SSF2, as well as Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Arabidopsis, Caenorhabditis elegans, mouse, and human homologues. Deletion of both SSF1 and SSF2 in yeast is lethal, and depletion of the gene products causes cell division arrest. Mosaic analysis of ppan mutant clones in Drosophila imaginal disks and ovaries demonstrates that ppan is cell autonomous and required for normal mitotic growth but is not absolutely required for general biosynthesis or DNA replication. Overexpression of the wild-type gene causes cell death and disrupts the normal development of adult structures. The ppan gene family appears to have an essential and evolutionarily conserved role in cell growth.     

Co-localization in replication foci and interaction of human Y-family members, DNA polymerase pol eta and REVl protein

The progress of replicative DNA polymerases along the replication fork may be impeded by the presence of lesions in the genome. One way to circumvent such hurdles involves the recruitment of specialized DNA polymerases that perform limited incorporation of nucleotides in the vicinity of the damaged site. This process entails DNA polymerase switch between replicative and specialized DNA polymerases. Five eukaryotic proteins can carry out translesion synthesis (TLS) of damaged DNA in vitro, DNA polymerases zeta, eta, iota, and kappa, and REV1. To identify novel proteins that interact with hpol eta, we performed a yeast two-hybrid screen. In this paper, we show that hREV1 interacts with hpol eta as well as with hpol kappa and poorly with hpol iota. Furthermore, cellular localization analysis demonstrates that hREV1 is present, with hpol eta in replication factories at stalled replication forks and is tightly associated with nuclear structures. This hREV1 nuclear localization occurs independently of the presence of hpol eta. Taken together, our data suggest a central role for hREV1 as a scaffold that recruits DNA polymerases involved in TLS.     

Quantitative SUMO-1 modification of a vaccinia virus protein is required for its specific localization and prevents its self-association

Vaccinia virus (VV), the prototype member of the Poxviridae, a family of large DNA viruses, carries out DNA replication in specialized cytoplasmic sites that are enclosed by the rough endoplasmic reticulum (ER). We show that the VV gene product of A40R is quantitatively modified by SUMO-1, which is required for its localization to the ER-enclosed replication sites. Expression of A40R lacking SUMO-1 induced the formation of rod-shaped cytoplasmic aggregates. The latter likely consisted of polymers of nonsumoylated protein, because unmodified A40R interacted with itself, but not with the SUMO-1-conjugated protein. Using a bacterial sumoylation system, we furthermore show that unmodified A40R is mostly insoluble, whereas the modified form is completely soluble. By electron microscopy, the A40R rods seen in cells were associated with the cytosolic side of the ER and induced the apposition of several ER cisternae. A40R is the first example of a poxvirus protein to acquire SUMO-1. Its quantitative SUMO-1 modification is required for its proper localization to the viral "mini-nuclei" and prevents its self-association. The ability of the nonsumoylated A40R to bring ER membranes close together could suggest a role in the fusion of ER cisternae when these coalesce to enclose the VV replication sites.     

Divergent roles for the two PolI-like organelle DNA polymerases of Arabidopsis

DNA polymerases play a central role in the process of DNA replication. Yet, the proteins in charge of the replication of plant organelle DNA have not been unambiguously identified. There are however many indications that a family of proteins homologous to bacterial DNA polymerase I (PolI) is implicated in organelle DNA replication. Here, we have isolated mutant lines of the PolIA and PolIB genes of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) to test this hypothesis. We find that mutation of both genes is lethal, thus confirming an essential and redundant role for these two proteins. However, the mutation of a single gene is sufficient to cause a reduction in the levels of DNA in both mitochondria and plastids. We also demonstrate that polIb, but not polIa mutant lines, are hypersensitive to ciprofloxacin, a small molecule that specifically induces DNA double-strand breaks in plant organelles, suggesting a function for PolIB in DNA repair. In agreement with this result, a cross between polIb and a plastid Whirly mutant line yielded plants with high levels of DNA rearrangements and severe growth defects, indicating impairments in plastid DNA repair pathways. Taken together, this work provides further evidences for the involvement of the plant PolI-like genes in organelle DNA replication and suggests an additional role for PolIB in DNA repair.     

Eukaryotic error-prone DNA polymerases: The presumed roles in replication, repair, and mutagenesis

A number of error-prone DNA polymerases have been found in various eukaryotes, ranging from yeasts to mammals, including humans. According to partial homology of the primary structure, they are grouped into families B, X, and Y. These enzymes display a high infidelity on an intact DNA template, but they are accurate on a damaged template. Error-prone DNA polymerases are characterized by probabilities of base substitution or frameshift mutations ranging from 10^?3 to 7.5 · 10^?1 in an intact DNA, whereas the spontaneous mutagenesis rate per replicated nucleotide varies between 10^?10 and 10^?12. Low-fidelity polymerases are terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT) and DNA polymerases β, ζ, κ, η, ι, λ, μ, and Rev1. The main characteristics of these enzymes are reviewed. None of them exhibits proofreading 3′ → 5′ exonuclease (PE) activity. The specialization of these polymerases consists in their capacity for synthesizing opposite DNA lesions (not eliminated by the numerous repair systems), which is explained by the flexibility of their active centers or a limited ability to express TdT activity. Classic DNA polymerases α, δ, ε, and γ cannot elongate primers with mismatched nucleotides at the 3′-end (which leads to replication block), whereas some specialized polymerases can catalyze this elongation. This is accompanied by overcoming the replication block, often at the expense of an increased mutagenesis rate. How can a cell exist under the conditions of this high infidelity of many DNA polymerase activities? Not all tissues of the body contain a complete set of low-fidelity DNA polymerases, although some of these enzymes are vitally important. In addition, cells “should not allow” error-prone DNA polymerases to work on undamaged DNA. After a lesion on the DNA template is bypassed, the cell should switch over from DNA synthesis catalyzed by specialized polymerases to the synthesis catalyzed by relatively high-fidelity DNA polymerases δ and ? (with an error frequency of 10^?5 to 10^?6) as soon as possible. This is done by forming complexes of polymerase δ or ? with proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and replication factors RP-A and RF-C. These highly processive complexes show a greater affinity to correct primers than specialized DNA polymerases do. The fact that specialized DNA polymerases are distributive or weakly processive favors the switching. The fidelity of these polymerases is increased by the PE function of DNA polymerases δ and ε, as well as autonomous 3′ → 5′ exonucleases, which are widespread over the entire phylogenetic tree of eukaryotes. The exonuclease correction decelerates replication in the presence of lesions in the DNA template but increases its fidelity, which decreases the probability of mutagenesis and carcinogenesis.     

The functional roles of mammalian DNA polymerase.

The viral DNA polymerases, with their probable role in viral DNA replication, point up the delicate control of DNA replication. Each cellular or viral induced DNA polymerase seems to have a role which is specific for the synthesis of a designated DNA and/or a place in a specialized replicative or repair process. A full understanding of the function of the eucaryotic DNA polymerases now depends on the clarification of the intimate mechanisms of DNA synthesis in its various modes. Identification of the accessory proteins, cofactors, and replicative DNA structures within a given replication complex, as has been accomplished in certain procaryotes (53), may help in this task.     

Eukaryotic error prone DNA polymerases: suggested roles in replication, repair and mutagenesis

A number of error-prone DNA polymerases is found among eukaryotes from yeasts up to mammalia including humans. According to the partial homology of a primary structure, they are united in families B, X, Y and display high infidelity on uninjured DNA-template, whereas they are rather accurate on DNA injuries. These DNA polymerases are characterized by the probability of base substitutions or frame shifts of 10(-3) to 7.5 x 10(-1) on DNA injuries, whereas the probability of spontaneous mutagenesis per replicated nucleotide accounts 10(-10) - 10(-12). Inaccurate DNA polymerases are terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT), DNA polymerases beta, zeta, kappa, eta, iota, lamda, mu, and Rev1. Their principal properties are described in this review. All of the polymerases under study are deprived of the corrective 3'-->5' exonucleolytic activity. The specialization of these polymerases is contained in the capability to synthesize opposite DNA lesions (not eliminated by multiple repair systems) that is explained by the flexibility of their active sites or by the limited capability to exhibit the TdT activity. Classic DNA polymerases alpha, delta, epsilon, and gamma cannot elongate the primers with mismatched nucleotides on their 3'-ends (that leads to the replication block), whereas some of the specialized polymerases can do it. It is accompanied by the overcoming of a replication block, often with the expense of an elevated mutagenesis. How can a cell live under the conditions of such a huge infidelity of many DNA polymerases? Error-prone DNA polymerases are not found in all tissues though some of them are essential for an organism survival. Furthermore, cells must not allow for these polymerases to work effectively on uninjured DNA. After bypass of a lesion on DNA-template, it is necessary, as soon as possible, to switch catalysis of the DNA synthesis from the specialized polymerases on the relatively accurate DNA polymerases delta and epsilon (fidelity of 10(-5) - 10(-6)). It is made by the formation of the complexes of polymerases delta or epsilon with PCNA and replicative factors RP-A and RF-C. Such highly processive complexes manifest the bigger affinity to the correct primers than the specialized DNA polymerases do. The switching is stimulated by distributivity or weak processivity of the specialized DNA polymerases. The accuracy of these polymerases are augmented by the action of the corrective 3'-exonucleolytic function of DNA polymerases delta and epsilon as well as by the autonomous 3'-->5' exonucleases which are widespread among the representatives of the whole phylogenetic tree. Exonucleolytic correction slows down the replication in the presence of lesions in DNA-template but makes the replication more accurate that decreases the probability of mutagenesis and carcinogenesis.     

Polyubiquitinated PCNA Recruits the ZRANB3 Translocase to Maintain Genomic Integrity after Replication Stress

Completion of DNA replication after replication stress depends on PCNA, which undergoes monoubiquitination to stimulate direct bypass of DNA lesions by specialized DNA polymerases or is polyubiquitinated to promote recombination-dependent DNA synthesis across DNA lesions by template switching mechanisms. Here we report that the ZRANB3 translocase, a SNF2 family member related to the SIOD disorder SMARCAL1 protein, is recruited by polyubiquitinated PCNA to promote fork restart following replication arrest. ZRANB3 depletion in mammalian cells results in an increased frequency of sister chromatid exchange and DNA damage sensitivity after treatment with agents that cause replication stress. Using in?vitro biochemical assays, we show that recombinant ZRANB3 remodels DNA?structures mimicking stalled replication forks and disassembles recombination intermediates. We therefore propose that ZRANB3 maintains genomic stability at stalled or collapsed replication forks by facilitating fork restart and limiting inappropriate recombination that could occur during template switching events.     

Specific recruitment of human cohesin to laser-induced DNA damage

Cohesin is a conserved multiprotein complex that plays an essential role in sister chromatid cohesion. During interphase, cohesin is required for the establishment of cohesion following DNA replication. Because cohesin mutants resulted in increased sensitivity to DNA damage, a role for cohesin in DNA repair was also suggested. However, it was unclear whether this was due to general perturbation of cohesion or whether cohesin has a specialized role at the damage site. We therefore used a laser microbeam to create DNA damage at discrete sites in the cell nucleus and observed specific in vivo assembly of proteins at these sites by immunofluorescent detection. We observed that human cohesin is recruited to the damage site immediately after damage induction. Analysis of mutant cells revealed that cohesin recruitment to the damage site is dependent on the DNA double-strand break repair factor Mre11/Rad50 but not ATM or Nbs1. Consistently, Mre11/Rad50 and cohesin interact with each other in an interphase-specific manner. This interaction peaks in S/G(2) phase, during which cohesin is recruited to the DNA damage. Our results demonstrate the S/G(2)-specific and Mre11/Rad50-dependent recruitment of human cohesin to DNA damage, suggesting a specialized subfunction for cohesin in cell cycle-specific DNA double strand break repair.     

Claspin,a Chk1-regulatory protein,monitors DNA replication on chromatin independently of RPA,ATR, and Rad17

Claspin is required for the ATR-dependent activation of Chk1 in Xenopus egg extracts containing incompletely replicated DNA. We show here that Claspin associates with chromatin in a regulated manner during S phase. Binding of Claspin to chromatin depends on the pre-replication complex (pre-RC) and Cdc45 but not on replication protein A (RPA). These dependencies suggest that binding of Claspin occurs around the time of initial DNA unwinding at replication origins. By contrast, both ATR and Rad17 require RPA for association with DNA. Claspin, ATR, and Rad17 all bind to chromatin independently. These findings suggest that Claspin plays a role in monitoring DNA replication during S phase. Claspin, ATR, and Rad17 may collaborate in checkpoint regulation by detecting different aspects of a DNA replication fork.     

RCC1, a regulator of mitosis, is essential for DNA replication.

Temperature-sensitive mutants in the RCC1 gene of BHK cells fail to maintain a correct temporal order of the cell cycle and will prematurely condense their chromosomes and enter mitosis at the restrictive temperature without having completed S phase. We have used Xenopus egg extracts to investigate the role that RCC1 plays in interphase nuclear functions and how this role might contribute to the known phenotype of temperature-sensitive RCC1 mutants. By immunodepleting RCC1 protein from egg extracts, we find that it is required for neither chromatin decondensation nor nuclear formation but that it is absolutely required for the replication of added sperm chromatin DNA. Our results further suggest that RCC1 does not participate enzymatically in replication but may be part of a structural complex which is required for the formation or maintenance of the replication machinery. By disrupting the replication complex, the loss of RCC1 might lead directly to disruption of the regulatory system which prevents the initiation of mitosis before the completion of DNA replication.