Structural divergence of the rotary ATPases

The rotary ATPase family of membrane protein complexes may have only three members, but each one plays a fundamental role in biological energy conversion. The F?F(o)-ATPase (F-ATPase) couples ATP synthesis to the electrochemical membrane potential in bacteria, mitochondria and chloroplasts, while the vacuolar H?-ATPase (V-ATPase) operates as an ATP-driven proton pump in eukaryotic membranes. In different species of archaea and bacteria, the A?A(o)-ATPase (A-ATPase) can function as either an ATP synthase or an ion pump. All three of these multi-subunit complexes are rotary molecular motors, sharing a fundamentally similar mechanism in which rotational movement drives the energy conversion process. By analogy to macroscopic systems, individual subunits can be assigned to rotor, axle or stator functions. Recently, three-dimensional reconstructions from electron microscopy and single particle image processing have led to a significant step forward in understanding of the overall architecture of all three forms of these complexes and have allowed the organisation of subunits within the rotor and stator parts of the motors to be more clearly mapped out. This review describes the emerging consensus regarding the organisation of the rotor and stator components of V-, A- and F-ATPases, examining core similarities that point to a common evolutionary origin, and highlighting key differences. In particular, it discusses how newly revealed variation in the complexity of the inter-domain connections may impact on the mechanics and regulation of these molecular machines.     

Inter-subunit rotation and elastic power transmission in F0F1-ATPase

ATP synthase (F-ATPase) produces ATP at the expense of ion-motive force or vice versa. It is composed from two motor/generators, the ATPase (F1) and the ion translocator (F0), which both are rotary steppers. They are mechanically coupled by 360 degrees rotary motion of subunits against each other. The rotor, subunits gamma(epsilon)C10-14, moves against the stator, (alphabeta)3delta(ab2). The enzyme copes with symmetry mismatch (C3 versus C10-14) between its two motors, and it operates robustly in chimeric constructs or with drastically modified subunits. We scrutinized whether an elastic power transmission accounts for these properties. We used the curvature of fluorescent actin filaments, attached to the rotating c ring, as a spring balance (flexural rigidity of 8.10(-26) N x m2) to gauge the angular profile of the output torque at F0 during ATP hydrolysis by F1. The large average output torque (56 pN nm) proved the absence of any slip. Angular variations of the torque were small, so that the output free energy of the loaded enzyme decayed almost linearly over the angular reaction coordinate. Considering the three-fold stepping and high activation barrier (>40 kJ/mol) of the driving motor (F1) itself, the rather constant output torque seen by F0 implied a soft elastic power transmission between F1 and F0. It is considered as essential, not only for the robust operation of this ubiquitous enzyme under symmetry mismatch, but also for a high turnover rate under load of the two counteracting and stepping motors/generators.     

Analysis of bacterial flagellar rotation

Bacterial flagella have rotary motors at their base; embedded in the cytoplasmic membrane and powered by transmembrane ion gradients instead of ATP. Assays have been developed to measure the torque output of individual motors over a wide regime of load, to correlate the energizing proton flux with rotation speed and relate through genetic analysis motor structure to function. These assays promise substantial advances in understanding mechanochemical coupling in these motors. Here, I summarize the present status of our understanding of energy transduction in bacterial flagella and compare this with the case for muscle.     

Rotary protein motors

Three protein motors have been unambiguously identified as rotary engines: the bacterial flagellar motor and the two motors that constitute ATP synthase (F(0)F(1) ATPase). Of these, the bacterial flagellar motor and F(0) motors derive their energy from a transmembrane ion-motive force, whereas the F(1) motor is driven by ATP hydrolysis. Here, we review the current understanding of how these protein motors convert their energy supply into a rotary torque.     

Rotary DNA motors.

Many molecular motors move unidirectionally along a DNA strand powered by nucleotide hydrolysis. These motors are multimeric ATPases with more than one hydrolysis site. We present here a model for how these motors generate the requisite force to process along their DNA track. This novel mechanism for force generation is based on a fluctuating electrostatic field driven by nucleotide hydrolysis. We apply the principle to explain the motion of certain DNA helicases and the portal protein, the motor that bacteriophages use to pump the genome into their capsids. The motor can reverse its direction without reversing the polarity of its electrostatic field, that is, without major structural modifications of the protein. We also show that the motor can be driven by an ion gradient; thus the mechanism may apply as well to the bacterial flagellar motor and to ATP synthase.     

Pushing, pulling and trapping--modes of motor protein supported protein translocation

Protein translocation across the cellular membranes is an ubiquitous and crucial activity of cells. This process is mediated by translocases that consist of a protein conducting channel and an associated motor protein. Motor proteins interact with protein substrates and utilize the free energy of ATP binding and hydrolysis for protein unfolding, translocation and unbinding. Since motor proteins are found either at the cis- or trans-side of the membrane, different mechanisms for translocation have been proposed. In the Power stroke model, cis-acting motors are thought to push, while trans-motors pull on the substrate protein during translocation. In the Brownian ratchet model, translocation occurs by diffusion of the unfolded polypeptide through the translocation pore while directionality is achieved by trapping and refolding. Recent insights in the structure and function of the molecular motors suggest that different mechanisms can be employed simultaneously.     

Kinesin and cytoplasmic dynein binding to brain microsomes.

Movement of cellular organelles in a directional manner along polar microtubules is driven by the motor proteins, kinesin and cytoplasmic dynein. The binding of these proteins to a microsomal fraction from embryonic chicken brain is investigated here. Both motors exhibit saturation binding to the vesicles, and proteolysis of vesicle membrane proteins abolishes binding. The maximal binding for kinesin is 12 +/- 1.7 and 43 +/- 2 pmol per mg of vesicle protein with or without 1 mM ATP, respectively. The maximal binding for cytoplasmic dynein is 55 +/- 3.8 and 73 +/- 3.7 pmol per mg of vesicle protein with or without ATP, respectively. These values correspond to 1-6 sites per vesicle of 100-nm diameter. The nonhydrolyzable ATP analog, adenyl-5'-yl imidodiphosphate (AMP-PNP), inhibited kinesin binding to vesicles but increased kinesin binding to microtubules. An antibody to the kinesin light chain also inhibited vesicle binding to kinesin. In the absence but not presence of ATP, competition between the two motors for binding was observed. We suggest that there are two distinguishable binding sites for kinesin and cytoplasmic dynein on these organelles in the presence of ATP and a shared site in the absence of ATP.     

Electron Spin Resonance in ATP and RNA

Cu⁺⁺, Mn⁺⁺, and Fe⁺⁺⁺ account for the electron spin resonances observed in certain samples of ATP and RNA. The copper ion seems more loosely bound to these substances than either iron or manganese. A striking similarity is observed between the manganese spectra in manganese RNA, ATP, and ADP suggesting that the binding sites are similar in the three compounds. The similarity of the e.s.r. spectra of iron ATP and of iron and manganese RNA, except for hyperfine spectrum (hfs) in the latter, suggests that the two ions bind similarly in the two compounds. A detailed interpretation of the spectra is lacking however and these conclusions can only be tentative. When manganese TPP and ATP are heated or pH changed the e.s.r. alters indicating a change in the environment of the ion. The sharp 6 line manganese spectrum in both TPP and ATP at pH 1 suggests an almost “free” ion at this pH in the sense of an almost isotropic average environment.     

Actin polymerization or myosin contraction: two ways to build up cortical tension for symmetry breaking

Cells use complex biochemical pathways to drive shape changes for polarization and movement. One of these pathways is the self-assembly of actin filaments and myosin motors that together produce the forces and tensions that drive cell shape changes. Whereas the role of actin and myosin motors in cell polarization is clear, the exact mechanism of how the cortex, a thin shell of actin that is underneath the plasma membrane, can drive cell shape changes is still an open question. Here, we address this issue using biomimetic systems: the actin cortex is reconstituted on liposome membranes, in an ‘outside geometry’. The actin shell is either grown from an activator of actin polymerization immobilized at the membrane by a biotin–streptavidin link, or built by simple adsorption of biotinylated actin filaments to the membrane, in the presence or absence of myosin motors. We show that tension in the actin network can be induced either by active actin polymerization on the membrane via the Arp2/3 complex or by myosin II filament pulling activity. Symmetry breaking and spontaneous polarization occur above a critical tension that opens up a crack in the actin shell. We show that this critical tension is reached by growing branched networks, nucleated by the Arp2/3 complex, in a concentration window of capping protein that limits actin filament growth and by a sufficient number of motors that pull on actin filaments. Our study provides the groundwork to understanding the physical mechanisms at work during polarization prior to cell shape modifications.     

Na,K-ATPase as A Brownian Motor: Electric Field-InducedConformational Fluctuation Leads to Uphill Pumping of Cation inthe Absence of ATP

Na,K-ATPase uses chemical bond energy of ATP to pump K⁺ into, andNa⁺ out of a cell. Both are uphill transports. During the catalyticcycle the enzyme alternates between two conformational states, E₁ andE₂. This communication describes an experiment, which employs electricfield to drive oscillation or fluctuation of enzyme conformation betweenthe E₁ and the E₂ states. It is shown that the field-inducedconformational oscillation or fluctuation leads to uphill pumping of thecation by the enzyme without consumption of ATP. Biochemical specificityof the catalysis is preserved. Data indicate that Na,K-ATPase can harvestenergy from the applied electric field to perform chemical work, and aratchet mechanism is inherent in this energy transduction process. ATheory of Electroconformational Coupling (TEC) that embodies essentialfeatures of the Brownian Ratchet successfully simulates the field-frequencyand field-amplitude optima and other features of the ion pumping activity.A four-state TEC motor can achieve high efficiency of the energytransduction, asymptotically reaching 100% under the optimal condition.Pumping by ion rectification fails to reach high efficiency. The TECconcept is also mused to understand other biological motors and engines.     

Mechanism of the F(1)F(0)-type ATP synthase, a biological rotary motor

The F(1)F(0)-type ATP synthase is a key enzyme in cellular energy interconversion. During ATP synthesis, this large protein complex uses a proton gradient and the associated membrane potential to synthesize ATP. It can also reverse and hydrolyze ATP to generate a proton gradient. The structure of this enzyme in different functional forms is now being rapidly elucidated. The emerging consensus is that the enzyme is constructed as two rotary motors, one in the F(1) part that links catalytic site events with movements of an internal rotor, and the other in the F(0) part, linking proton translocation to movements of this F(0) rotor. Although both motors can work separately, they must be connected together to interconvert energy. Evidence for the function of the rotary motor, from structural, genetic and biophysical studies, is reviewed here, and some uncertainties and remaining mysteries of the enzyme mechanism are also discussed.     

MOUSE NEUROBLASTOMA CELL ADENYLATE CYCLASE: REGULATION BY 2-CHLOROADENOSINE, PROSTAGLANDIN E1 AND THE CATIONS Mg2+, Ca2+ AND Mn

—Some basic kinetic properties of adenylate cyclase in cell free preparations of mouse neuroblastoma were investigated. Production of cAMP from ATP by the enzyme requires the presence of either Mg²⁺ or Mn²⁺ in addition to ATP. In the presence of Mg²⁺, the K_m for ATP is 120 ± 15 μM and the interaction of ATP and adenylate cyclase appears to be non-cooperative (Hill coefficient of 1). Magnesium ion concentrations in excess of the ATP concentration cause stimulation although similar excess concentrations of Mn²⁺ cause inhibition. Prostaglandin E₁ and 2-chloroadenosine activate the enzyme. The K_m of the cyclase for 2-chloroadenosine is 6 μm . Activation by 2-chloroadenosine leads to an increase in V_max but does not effect the K_m for ATP. At a fixed ATP concentration, the extent of activation caused by prostaglandin E₁ and 2-chloroadenosine is inversely related to the Mg²⁺ concentration. Calcium ion causes inhibition of adenylate cyclase from 0.1 to 4mM with a K_i of 5 ± 10^?4m . Ca²⁺ interaction with the enzyme in the absence or presence of either 2-chloroadenosine or prostaglandin E₁ appears cooperative (i.e. Hill coefficients of ?2). Ca²⁺ inhibition is non-competitive with respect to either ATP or 2-chloroadenosine but is progressively diminished by increasing Mn²⁺ concentrations. Divalent cation effects and activation by 2-chloroadenosine and prostaglandin E₁ of the neuroblastoma adenylate cyclase are compared with ion effects and hormone activation of the enzyme obtained from non-neuronal tissue.     

Kinesin motors as molecular machines

Molecular motor proteins, fueled by energy from ATP hydrolysis, move along actin filaments or microtubules, performing work in the cell. The kinesin microtubule motors transport vesicles or organelles, assemble bipolar spindles or depolymerize microtubules, functioning in basic cellular processes. The mechanism by which motor proteins convert energy from ATP hydrolysis into work is likely to differ in basic ways from man-made machines. Several mechanical elements of the kinesin motors have now been tentatively identified, permitting researchers to begin to decipher the mechanism of motor function. The force-producing conformational changes of the motor and the means by which they are amplified are probably different for the plus- and minus-end kinesin motors.     

Properties of the Kinesin-1 motor DdKif3 from Dictyostelium discoideum

The amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum possesses genes for 13 different kinesins. Here we characterize DdKif3, a member of the Kinesin-1 family. Kinesin-1 motors form homodimers that can move micrometer-long distances on microtubules using the energy derived from ATP hydrolysis. We expressed recombinant motors in Escherichia coli and tested them in different in vitro assays. Full-length and truncated Kif3 motors were active in gliding and ATPase assays. They showed a strong dependence on ionic strength. Like the full-length motor, the truncated DdKif3-592 motor (aa 1-592; comprising motor domain, neck, and partial stalk) reached its maximum speed of around 2.0micrcom s(-1) at a potassium acetate concentration of 200mM. The shortened DdKif3-342 motor (aa 1-342; comprising motor domain, partial neck) showed a high ATP turnover, comparable to that of the fungal Kinesin-1, Nkin. Results from the duty cycle calculations and gliding assays indicate that DdKif3 is a processive motor. A GFP-fusion protein revealed a mainly cytoplasmic localization of DdKif3. Immunofluorescence staining makes an association with the endoplasmic reticulum or mitochondria unlikely. Despite a similar phylogenetic distance to both metazoa and fungi, in terms of its biochemical properties DdKif3 revealed a closer similarity to fungal than animal kinesins.     

Direct phosphorylation of capsaicin receptor VR1 by protein kinase Cepsilon and identification of two target serine residues

The capsaicin receptor, VR1, is a sensory neuron-specific ion channel that serves as a polymodal detector of pain-producing chemical and physical stimuli. It has been reported that ATP, one of the inflammatory mediators, potentiates the VR1 currents evoked by capsaicin or protons and reduces the temperature threshold for activation of VR1 through metabotropic P2Y(1) receptors in a protein Kinase C (PKC)-dependent pathway, suggesting the phosphorylation of VR1 by PKC. In this study, direct phosphorylation of VR1 upon application of phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) was proven biochemically in cells expressing VR1. An in vitro kinase assay using glutathione S-transferase fusion proteins with cytoplasmic segments of VR1 showed that both the first intracellular loop and carboxyl terminus of VR1 were phosphorylated by PKCepsilon. Patch clamp analysis of the point mutants where Ser or Thr residues were replaced with Ala in the total 16 putative phosphorylation sites showed that two Ser residues, Ser(502) and Ser(800) were involved in the potentiation of the capsaicin-evoked currents by either PMA or ATP. In the cells expressing S502A/S800A double mutant, the temperature threshold for activation was not reduced upon PMA treatment. The two sites would be promising targets for the development of substance modulating VR1 function, thereby reducing pain.     

Common mechanisms of DNA translocation motors in bacteria and viruses using one-way revolution mechanism without rotation

Biomotors were once described into two categories: linear motor and rotation motor. Recently, a third type of biomotor with revolution mechanism without rotation has been discovered. By analogy, rotation resembles the Earth rotating on its axis in a complete cycle every 24 h, while revolution resembles the Earth revolving around the Sun one circle per 365 days (see animations http://nanobio.uky.edu/movie.html). The action of revolution that enables a motor free of coiling and torque has solved many puzzles and debates that have occurred throughout the history of viral DNA packaging motor studies. It also settles the discrepancies concerning the structure, stoichiometry, and functioning of DNA translocation motors. This review uses bacteriophages Phi29, HK97, SPP1, P22, T4, and T7 as well as bacterial DNA translocase FtsK and SpoIIIE or the large eukaryotic dsDNA viruses such as mimivirus and vaccinia virus as examples to elucidate the puzzles. These motors use ATPase, some of which have been confirmed to be a hexamer, to revolve around the dsDNA sequentially. ATP binding induces conformational change and possibly an entropy alteration in ATPase to a high affinity toward dsDNA; but ATP hydrolysis triggers another entropic and conformational change in ATPase to a low affinity for DNA, by which dsDNA is pushed toward an adjacent ATPase subunit. The rotation and revolution mechanisms can be distinguished by the size of channel: the channels of rotation motors are equal to or smaller than 2 nm, that is the size of dsDNA, whereas channels of revolution motors are larger than 3 nm. Rotation motors use parallel threads to operate with a right-handed channel, while revolution motors use a left-handed channel to drive the right-handed DNA in an anti-chiral arrangement. Coordination of several vector factors in the same direction makes viral DNA-packaging motors unusually powerful and effective. Revolution mechanism that avoids DNA coiling in translocating the lengthy genomic dsDNA helix could be advantageous for cell replication such as bacterial binary fission and cell mitosis without the need for topoisomerase or helicase to consume additional energy.     

Fructose prevents 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-induced ATP depletion and toxicity in isolated hepatocytes

The loss of viability of isolated rat hepatocytes exposed to either 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) or its toxic metabolite 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium ion (MPP+) was prevented by addition of fructose to the incubation medium. This protection was dependent on fructose concentration, being complete at 10 mM. Addition of fructose dramatically delayed MPTP- and MPP+-induced depletion of ATP and was accompanied by a significant accumulation of lactate, indicating the occurrence of enhanced glycolytic production of ATP. Glucose was much less effective against MPTP and MPP+ toxicity, probably because it is a relatively poor substrate for glycolysis in liver cells. We conclude that depletion of ATP is a critical event in MPTP cytotoxicity in our in vitro model system, and that the use of alternative sources of ATP production may represent an important protective device against the effects of this toxic agent.     

Deltapsi and DeltapH are equivalent driving forces for proton transport through isolated F(0) complexes of ATP synthases

The membrane-embedded F(0) part of ATP synthases is responsible for ion translocation during ATP synthesis and hydrolysis. Here, we describe an in vitro system for measuring proton fluxes through F(0) complexes by fluorescence changes of the entrapped fluorophore pyranine. Starting from purified enzyme, the F(0) part was incorporated unidirectionally into phospholipid vesicles. This allowed analysis of proton transport in either synthesis or hydrolysis direction with Deltapsi or DeltapH as driving forces. The system displayed a high signal-to-noise ratio and can be accurately quantified. In contrast to ATP synthesis in the Escherichia coli F(1)F(0) holoenzyme, no significant difference was observed in the efficiency of DeltapH or Deltapsi as driving forces for H(+)-transport through F(0). Transport rates showed linear dependency on the driving force. Proton transport in hydrolysis direction was about 2400 H(+)/(s x F(0)) at Deltapsi of 120 mV, which is approximately twice as fast as in synthesis direction. The chloroplast enzyme was faster and catalyzed H(+)-transport at initial rates of 6300 H(+)/(s x F(0)) under similar conditions. The new method is an ideal tool for detailed kinetic investigations of the ion transport mechanism of ATP synthases from various organisms.     

Mechanical transduction mechanisms of RecA-like molecular motors

A majority of ATP-dependent molecular motors are RecA-like proteins, performing diverse functions in biology. These RecA-like molecular motors consist of a highly conserved core containing the ATP-binding site. Here I examined how ATP binding within this core is coupled to the conformational changes of different RecA-like molecular motors. Conserved hydrogen bond networks and conformational changes revealed two major mechanical transduction mechanisms: (1) intra-domain conformational changes and (2) inter-domain conformational changes. The intra-domain mechanism has a significant hydrogen bond rearrangement within the domain containing the P-loop, causing relative motion between two parts of the protein. The inter-domain mechanism exhibits little conformational change in the P-loop domain. Instead, the major conformational change is observed between the P-loop domain and an adjacent domain or subunit containing the arginine finger. These differences in the mechanical transduction mechanisms may link to the underlying energy surface governing a Brownian ratchet or a power stroke.     

Molecular motors: how to make models that can be used to convey the concept of molecular ratchets and thermal capture

A wide variety of cellular processes use molecular motors, including processive motors that move along some form of track (e.g., myosin with actin, kinesin or dynein with tubulin) and polymerases that move along a template (e.g., DNA and RNA polymerases, ribosomes). In trying to understand how these molecular motors actually move, many apply their understanding of how man-made motors work: the latter use some form of energy to exert a force or torque on its load. However, quite a different mechanism has been proposed to possibly account for the movement of molecular motors. Rather than hydrolyzing ATP to push or pull their load, they might use their own thermal vibrational energy as well as that of their load and their environment to move the load, capturing those movements that occur along a desired vector or axis and resisting others; ATP hydrolysis is required to make backward movements impossible. This intriguing thermal capture or Brownian ratchet model is relatively more difficult to convey to students. In this report, we describe several teaching aids that are very easily constructed using widely available household materials to convey the concept of a molecular ratchet.