An acoustical and physiological analysis of buzzing in cicada killer wasps (Sphecius speciosus )

Cicada killers (Sphecius speciosus) are large solitary wasps capable of producing a high-amplitude buzzing sound. The buzz was acoustically characterized and its thermal and energetic effects examined. The sound was amplitude modulated, variable in frequency, had many harmonics, and was sometimes interrupted by broad-band buzz pulses. Cicada killer body size was directly related to sound pressure level and inversely related to frequency. Buzzing in males was 70 ± 0.8(21) dB (re 20 μPa measured 3 cm from the dorsum of the thorax) in sound pressure amplitude, with a fundamental frequency of 209 ± 6(20) Hz, while in females buzzes were 72.6 ± 8.3(30) dB and 152.5 ± 5.2(29) Hz. Males, the smaller of the sexes, had buzzes of significantly lower amplitude and higher frequency. Metabolic rate was 0.293 ± 0.024(13) W g⁻¹, or 88% of maximal, during buzzing, and was 5–100 times more costly than file-and-scraper stridulation. Thorax temperature climbed rapidly during sound production and peaked at levels that were nearly optimal for flight. Buzzing may play a role in both interspecific and intraspecific defensive interations. Accepted: 16 July 1998     

Post-feed buzzing in the tsetse, Glossina morsitans morsitans, is an endothermic mechanism

ABSTRACT. Post-feed buzzing in Glossina morsitans morsitans Westw. causes a rise in thoracic temperature relative to the length of the buzz. As lift is proportional to the square of wing-beat frequency, which increases with temperature up to 32°C, buzzing results in an increase in the lift which the fly can produce. Heat generated by buzzing, in combination with the heat received from the host at the time of feeding, may well allow the fly to maximize lift generated in the immediate post-feeding period. Buzzing flies excrete excess water from the meal more rapidly than non-buzzing flies. It is argued that this is due to a rise in abdominal temperature. Maximized lift in the immediate post-feeding period and the rapid elimination of water from the very large blood meals taken by these flies may be expected to have strong selective advantages for the flies.     

Effects of flight behaviour on body temperature and kinematics during inter-male mate competition in the solitary desert bee Centris pallida

Abstract. Body temperatures and kinematics are measured for male Centris pallida bees engaged in a variety of flight behaviours (hovering, patrolling, pursuit) at a nest aggregation site in the Sonoran Desert. The aim of the study is to test for evidence of thermoregulatory variation in convective heat loss and metabolic heat production and to assess the mechanisms of acceleration and forward flight in field conditions. Patrolling males have slightly (1–3 °C) cooler body temperatures than hoverers, despite similar wingbeat frequencies and larger body masses, suggesting that convective heat loss is likely to be greater during patrolling flight than during hovering. Comparisons of thorax and head temperature as a function of air temperature (T_a) indicate that C. pallida males are thermoregulating the head by increasing heat transfer from the thorax to the head at cool T_a. During patrolling flight and hovering, wingbeat frequency significantly decreases as T_a increases, indicating that variation in metabolic heat production contributes to thermal stability during these behaviours, as has been previously demonstrated for this species during flight in a metabolic chamber. However, wingbeat frequency during brief (1–2 s) pursuits is significantly higher than during other flight behaviours and independent of T_a. Unlike most other hovering insects, C. pallida males hover with extremely inclined stroke plane angles and nearly horizontal body angles, suggesting that its ability to vary flight speed depends on changes in wingbeat frequency and other kinematic mechanisms that are not yet described.     

Thermoregulatory strategies in two closely related sympatric Scarabaeus species (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae)

Abstract. The thermoregulation strategies of Scarabaeus sacer L. and Scarabaeus cicatricosus Lucas were studied in the Doñana National Park, Spain. In this area, both species coexist, showing the same habitat and food preferences. However, S. cicatricosus is active during warmer parts of the day compared to S. sacer. Both species thermoregulate their thoracic temperature but, whereas the abdomen of S. sacer is a passive thermal window, S. cicatricosus actively thermoregulates abdominal temperature by increasing heat transfer from the thorax to the abdomen at high T_a values. In the case of S. sacer, their endothermy indicates an adaptive capacity to thorax heat retention, as occurs mainly in winter‐flying insects. This mechanism, possibly related to the aerodynamic flight posture in Scarabaeinae, could be an effective barrier to retard the rate of abdominal heat loss during flight. This endothermic strategy makes flight difficult at higher temperatures, although it allows flight during cooler periods of the day. On the other hand, S. cicatricosus showed a different adaptive behaviour to S. sacer. In this case, a significant decrease in abdominal heat loss at higher ambient temperatures would indicate a decrease in heat transfer from the thorax to the abdomen, as occurs in some desert and semiarid insects. This ‘heat exchanger’ mechanism observed in S. cicatricosus could be due to the irregular posture adopted during flight, with the posterior legs clearly extended and separate from the body. This behaviour increases turbulence and convective cooling, favouring exposure of the soft abdominal tergal cuticle and, subsequently, water loss. Thus, for S. cicatricosus, the well‐adapted ‘heat exchanger’ permits flight during periods of the day when temperatures would possibly be lethal for those species with high endothermy. From an adaptive viewpoint, these mechanisms of thermoregulation may explain how both closely‐related sympatric species respond in different ways to environmental temperature, favouring their coexistence.     

Differences in Morphometry and Activity among Tabanid Fly Assemblages in an Andean Tropical Montane Cloud Forest: Indication of Altitudinal Migration?

Evidence suggests that variations along ecological gradients shape organism traits such as behavior or morphometry. We studied the effect of altitude on the flight activity of tropical tabanid fly assemblages of one species of Stypommisa Enderlein along a 1 km altitudinal gradient on the northwestern slopes of the Ecuadorian Andes. Our objectives were as follows: (1) to test the hypothesis that highland individuals present larger flight body structures; and (2) to compare the flight activity patterns of flies’ assemblages among altitudes and correlate it with weather factors. We sampled specimens in Malaise traps at 1180, 1680 and 2180 m of altitude from 0600 to 1830 h for 20 d at each site. Seven weather variables were measured every hour and flight activity was inferred from relative tabanid fly abundances/hour in traps. We measured morphometrical parameters that included tabanid fly body size, thorax volume, wing area and wing loading. Flight activity patterns revealed a bimodal distribution at 1680 m, and two asynchronous unimodal distributions, one at 1180 and one at 2180 m. GLM analyses revealed that temperature, mist and rainfall were the best predictors of fly activity differences among altitudes. Morphometrical analyses showed that body size and thorax volume increased with increasing altitude. Synchronous groups of flies at different altitudes (those between 1180–1680_(pm) m, and 1680_(am)–2180 m) were morphologically similar, suggesting that flies could be capable of migrating from highlands to lowlands at defined hours of the day depending on forest weather conditions.     

DafA cycles between the DnaK chaperone system and translational machinery

DafA is encoded by the dnaK operon of Thermus thermophilus and mediates the formation of a highly stable complex between the chaperone DnaK and its co-chaperone DnaJ under normal growth conditions. DafA(Tth) contains 87 amino acid residues and is the only member of the DnaK(Tth) chaperone system for which no corresponding protein has yet been identified in other organisms and whose particular function has remained elusive. Here, we show directly that the DnaK(Tth)-DnaJ(Tth)-DafA(Tth) complex cannot represent the active chaperone species since DafA(Tth) inhibits renaturation of firefly luciferase by suppressing substrate association. Since DafA(Tth) must be released before the substrate proteins can bind we hypothesized that free DafA(Tth) might have regulatory functions connected to the heat shock response. Here, we present evidence that supports this hypothesis. We identified the 70S ribosome as binding target of free DafA(Tth). Our results show that the association of DafA(Tth) and 70S ribosomes does not require the participation of DnaK(Tth) or DnaJ(Tth). On the contrary, the assembly of DnaK(Tth)-DnaJ(Tth)-DafA(Tth) and ribosome-DafA(Tth) complexes seems to be competitive. These findings strongly suggest the involvement of DafA(Tth) in regulatory processes occurring at a translational level, which could represent a new mechanism of heat shock response as an adaptation to elevated temperature.     

Thermal Behaviour of Honeybees During Aggressive Interactions

We report here on the interrelationship of aggressive behaviour and thermoregulation in honeybees. Body temperature measurements were carried out without behavioural disturbance by infrared thermography. Guard bees, foragers, drones, and queens involved in aggressive interactions were always endothermic, i.e. had their flight muscles activated. Guards made differential use of their endothermic capacity. Mean thorax temperature was 34.2–35.1°C during examination of bees but higher during fights with wasps (37°C) or attack of humans (38.6°C). They usually cooled down when examining bees whereas examinees often heated up during prolonged interceptions (maximum >47°C). Guards neither adjusted their thorax temperature (and thus flight muscle function and agility) to that of examined workers, nor to that of drones, which were 2–7°C warmer. Guards examined cool bees (<33°C) longer than warmer ones, supporting the hypothesis that heating of examinees facilitates odour identification by guards, probably because of vapour pressure increase of semiochemicals with temperature. Guards in the core of aggressive balls clinged to the attacked insects to fix them and kill them by heat (maximum 46.5°C). Bees in the outer cluster layers resembled normal guards behaviourally and thermally. They served as active core insulators by heating up to 43.9°C. While balled wasps were cooler (maximum 42.5°C) than clinging guards balled bees behaved like examinees with maximum temperatures of 46.6°C, which further supports the hypothesis that the examinees heat up to facilitate odour identification.     

Thermal physiological ecology of Colias butterflies in flight

Summary As a comparison to the many studies of larger flying insects, we carried out an initial study of heat balance and thermal dependence of flight of a small butterfly (Colias) in a wind tunnel and in the wild.Unlike many larger, or facultatively endothermic insects, Colias do not regulate heat loss by altering hemolymph circulation between thorax and abdomen as a function of body temperature. During flight, thermal excess of the abdomen above ambient temperature is weakly but consistently coupled to that of the thorax. Total heat loss is best expressed as the sum of heat loss from the head and thorex combined plus heat loss from the abdomen because the whole body is not isothermal. Convective cooling is a simple linear function of the square root of air speed from 0.2 to 2.0 m/s in the wind tunnel. Solar heat flux is the main source of heat gain in flight, just as it is the exclusive source for warmup at rest. The balance of heat gain from sunlight versus heat loss from convection and radiation does not appear to change by more than a few percent between the wings-closed basking posture and the variable opening of wings in flight, although several aspects require further study. Heat generation by action of the flight muscles is small (on the order of 100 m W/g tissue) compared to values reported for other strongly flying insects. Colias appears to have only very limited capacity to modulate flight performance. Wing beat frequency varies from 12–19 Hz depending on body mass, air speed, and thoracic temperature. At suboptimal flight temperatures, wing beat frequency increases significantly with thoracic temperature and body mass but is independent of air speed. Within the reported thermal optimum of 35–39°C, wing beat frequency is negatively dependent on air speed at values above 1.5 m/s, but independent of mass and body temperature. Flight preference of butterflies in the wind tunnel is for air speeds of 0.5–1.5 m/s, and no flight occurs at or above 2.5 m/s. Voluntary flight initiation in the wild occurs only at air speeds 1.4 m/s.In the field, Colias fly just above the vegetation at body temperatures of 1–2°C greater than when basking at the top of the vegetation. These measurements are consistent with our findings on low heat gain from muscular activity during flight. Basking temperatures of butterflies sheltered from the wind within the vegetation were 1–2°C greater than flight temperatures at vegetation height.     

Effect of sex,age and morphological traits on tethered flight of Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae) at different temperatures

The oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae), is a pest of fruit and vegetable production that has become established in 42 countries in Africa after its first detection in 2003 in Kenya. It is likely that this rapid expansion is partly due to the reported strong capacity for flight by the pest. This study investigated the tethered flight performance of B. dorsalis over a range of constant temperatures in relation to sex and age. Tethered flight of unmated B. dorsalis aged 3, 10 and 21 days was recorded for 1 h using a computerized flight mill at temperatures of 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32 and 36 °C. Variations in fly morphology were observed as they aged. Body mass and wing loading increased with age, whereas wing length and wing area reduced as flies aged. Females had slightly larger wings than males but were not significantly heavier. The longest total distance flown by B. dorsalis in 1 h was 1559.58 m. Frequent short, fast flights were recorded at 12 and 36 °C, but long-distance flight was optimal between 20 and 24 °C. Young flies tended to have shorter flight bouts than older flies, which was associated with them flying shorter distances. Heavier flies with greater wing loading flew further than lighter flies. Flight distances recorded on flight mills approximated those recorded in the field, and tethered flight patterns suggest a need to factor temperature into the interpretation of trap captures.     

Operant Learning of Drosophila at the Torque Meter

For experiments at the torque meter, flies are kept on standard fly medium at 25°C and 60% humidity with a 12hr light/12hr dark regime. A standardized breeding regime assures proper larval density and age-matched cohorts. Cold-anesthetized flies are glued with head and thorax to a triangle-shaped hook the day before the experiment. Attached to the torque meter via a clamp, the fly''s intended flight maneuvers are measured as the angular momentum around its vertical body axis. The fly is placed in the center of a cylindrical panorama to accomplish stationary flight. An analog to digital converter card feeds the yaw torque signal into a computer which stores the trace for later analysis. The computer also controls a variety of stimuli which can be brought under the fly''s control by closing the feedback loop between these stimuli and the yaw torque trace. Punishment is achieved by applying heat from an adjustable infrared laser.     

Comparative thermoregulation of sympatric endothermic and ectothermic cicadas (Homoptera: Cicadidae: Tibicen winnemanna and Tibicen chloromerus)

Measurements of body temperature in the field demonstrated that endothermic cicadas regulate body temperature by behavioral mechanisms as well as by endogenous heat production. Regression analysis suggests both endothermic and ectothermic species are thermoregulating. Body temperature of endothermically active cicadas without access to exogenous heat is approximately the same as the body temperature of basking cicadas. Tibicen winnemanna (Davis) raises body temperature in the field with the heat produced in flight or through the activation of the flight musculature without the act of flight. T. chloromerus (Walker) uses solar radiation to elevate body temperature to the level necessary for activity. The thermal responses of each species are related to its activity patterns with minimum flight temperature and shade-seeking temperatures significantly lower in the endothermic T. winnemanna. Heat torpor temperature appears to be related to the environment rather than behavior pattern. Endothermy in cicadas may serve to uncouple reproductive behavior from environmental constraints; to circumvent possible thermoregulatory problems; to permit the utilization of habitats unavailable to strictly ectothermic cicadas; to reduce predation; to optimize broadcast coverage and sound transmission; and to decrease possible acoustic interference. Accepted: 25 March 2000     

Thermoregulatory responses to acute body heating in rats acclimated to continuous heat exposure

Thermoregulatory responses to an acute heat load with intraperitoneal heating (IH) or indirect external warming (EW) by increasing ambient temperature (Ta) were investigated with direct and indirect calorimetry in rats acclimated to environments of 24.0 degrees C (Cn), 29.4 degrees C (H1), and 32.8 degrees C (H2) for greater than 15 days. The rats were placed in a direct calorimeter where the air temperature was maintained at 24 degrees C for the initial 3 h. IH was then made for 30 min through an electric heater implanted chronically (6.5 W.kg-1) in the peritoneal cavity, and EW was performed by raising the jacket water temperature surrounding the calorimeter from 24 to 39 degrees C (0.19 degrees C.min-1). Hypothalamic (Thy) and colonic temperature immediately before the start of the heat load tended to be higher as the acclimation temperature increased. During IH, the threshold Thy for the tail skin vasodilation (Tth) was significantly higher in H2 than in Cn rats. During EW, however, there was no difference in Tth between the groups. Metabolic heat production (M) was slightly suppressed during IH and significantly depressed only in H2 rats. During EW, M was suppressed in all the groups. The magnitude and duration of suppression were greater in H2 rats than in the other two groups. The responses in nonevaporative heat loss and thermal conductance (C) to the rise in Thy did not differ among the three groups during IH. According to the rise in Thy, however, there was a greater C increase in H2 than in Cn and H1 rats during EW.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Body temperature regulation,energy metabolism,and foraging in light-seeking and shade-seeking robber flies

Summary Robber flies (Diptera: Asilidae) were studied in Panama from May through August. Of the 16 species examined, 5 perched and foraged in the sun and 11 perched and foraged in the shade. Thoracic body temperatures of light-seeking flies ranged from 35.2–40.6°C during foraging. Light-seeking flies regulated body temperature behaviorally by microhabitat selection and postural adjustments, and physiologically by transferring warmed haemolymph from the thorax to the cooler abdomen. Thoracic temperatures of shade-seeking flies passively followed ambient temperature in the shade and these flies did not thermoregulate. None of these robber flies warmed endothermically in the absence of flight. Resting oxygen consumption ( ) of both groups scaled with body mass to the 0.77 power. The factorial increment in resulting from hovering flight ranged from 12 to 56. The increased markedly with body temperature in light-seeking flies and probably explains the greater foraging effort observed in these species. Wing loading of all 16 species of robber flies scaled with body mass to the 0.39 power. Large light-seeking flies had heavier wing loading than large shade-seeking flies. The differences in body temperature and wing loading between light-seeking and shade-seeking robber flies may be related to differences in flight speed and maneuverability during foraging.     

Mechanisms of Thermoregulation in Flying Bees

SYNOPSIS. Thermoregulation of elevated thorax temperatures isnecessary for bees to achieve the high rates of power productionrequired for flight, and is a key factor allowing them to occupywidely varying thermal environments. However, the mechanismsby which bees thermoregulate during flight are poorly understood.Thermoregulation is accomplished by balancing heat gain andheat loss via the following routes: convection, evaporation,and metabolic heat production. There appears to be a diversityof thermoregulatory mechanisms employed during flight amongbee species. Some species, particularly Bombus spp., activelyincrease the distribution of thoracic heat to the abdomen duringflight as air temperature (T_a) rises, and apparently thermoregulateby varying convective heat loss. However, thermal variationin convection has not been directly measured for any free-flyingbee. Above 33°C, flying Apis mellifera greatly increaseevaporative heat loss with T_a, and many other species "tongue-lash"during flight at high T_as or when artificially heated. Thus,evaporation seems to be important for preventing overheatingduring flight at very high T_as. Flying A. mellifera and Centrispallida strongly decrease metabolic rate as T_a increases, suggestingthat they are varying metabolic heat production for thermoregulationand not aerodynamic requirements. Variation in metabolic heatproduction appears to be mediated by changes in wingbeat kinematics,since wingbeat frequency decreases with T_a for A. melliferaand Centris spp. It is unknown if the decrease in flight metabolicrate at higher T_as occurs secondarily as a consequence of greaterefficiency or if it is truly an active response.     

Energetic Optimisation of Foraging Honeybees: Flexible Change of Strategies in Response to Environmental Challenges

Heterothermic insects like honeybees, foraging in a variable environment, face the challenge of keeping their body temperature high to enable immediate flight and to promote fast exploitation of resources. Because of their small size they have to cope with an enormous heat loss and, therefore, high costs of thermoregulation. This calls for energetic optimisation which may be achieved by different strategies. An ‘economizing’ strategy would be to reduce energetic investment whenever possible, for example by using external heat from the sun for thermoregulation. An ‘investment-guided’ strategy, by contrast, would be to invest additional heat production or external heat gain to optimize physiological parameters like body temperature which promise increased energetic returns. Here we show how honeybees balance these strategies in response to changes of their local microclimate. In a novel approach of simultaneous measurement of respiration and body temperature foragers displayed a flexible strategy of thermoregulatory and energetic management. While foraging in shade on an artificial flower they did not save energy with increasing ambient temperature as expected but acted according to an ‘investment-guided’ strategy, keeping the energy turnover at a high level (∼56–69 mW). This increased thorax temperature and speeded up foraging as ambient temperature increased. Solar heat was invested to increase thorax temperature at low ambient temperature (‘investment-guided’ strategy) but to save energy at high temperature (‘economizing’ strategy), leading to energy savings per stay of ∼18–76% in sunshine. This flexible economic strategy minimized costs of foraging, and optimized energetic efficiency in response to broad variation of environmental conditions.     

Thermoregulation of water collecting honey bees (Apis mellifera)

Honey bees (Apis mellifera carnica, Apidae, Hymenoptera) visited a pond in order to collect water. During their stays at the pond the body surface temperature of water foragers was measured using contactless thermography. Irrespective of the ambient temperature (T(A)) which ranged from 13.6 to 27.2 degrees C, the water carriers reached thoracic temperatures of 36-38.8 degrees C (mean values of the measuring periods). The maximum thoracic value of an individual bee was 44.5 degrees C. At higher T(A) (20.9-27.2 degrees C) head and abdomen were only about 3 degrees C and 2 degrees C on the average higher than the surroundings, respectively. In the lower range of T(A) (13.6-16.6 degrees C), however, the bees warmed their heads up to 29.2 degrees C (13 degrees C above T(A)) and the abdomen up to 23.3 degrees C (7.1 degrees C above T(A); mean values of the measuring periods).The head and abdomen were even provided independently of one another with heat from the thorax. At a higher T(A) only little heat came from the heated thorax into the abdomen, at a cooler T(A) (13.6-16.6 degrees C) more heat reached the abdomen. In all probability, at a higher T(A) only a small amount of haemolymph was pumped from the thorax into the abdomen; the most warm blood probably circulated in the head-thorax area. The average duration of stays at the pond decreased linearly from 110 to 42 s with rising T(A). Head and thorax showed great fluctuations of temperature. For example, the head was heated by 4.6 degrees C within 25 s, the thorax by 6.1 degrees C within 30 s.Foragers drinking sucrose solution are known to increase their thoracic temperature with rising concentration of the sucrose solution. The water foragers had thoracic temperatures similar to that of bees feeding on 0.5 molar sucrose solution. It is hypothesized that the foraging motivation of both groups was similar and therefore they regulated their thoraces at the same temperature level.     

Can evolution of sexual dimorphism be triggered by developmental temperatures?

Genetic prerequisites for the evolution of sexual dimorphism, sex-specific heritabilities and low or negative genetic correlations between homologous traits in males and females are rarely found. However, sexual dimorphism is evolving rapidly following environmental change, suggesting that sexual dimorphism and its genetic background could be environmentally sensitive. Yet few studies have explored the sensitivity of the genetic background of sexual dimorphism on environmental variation. In this study, on Drosophila melanogaster, we used a large nested full-sib-half-sib breeding design where families were split into four different developmental temperatures: two constant temperature treatments of 25 and 30 °C and two cycling temperatures with means of 25 and 30 °C, respectively. After emergence, we tested heat shock tolerance of adult flies. We found that sexual dimorphism was strongly affected by temperature during development. Moreover, we found that female heritability was significantly lower in flies developing at hot temperature and more so under hot and cycling temperatures. Interestingly, most of the genetic variation for heat shock tolerance was orthogonal (i.e. noncorrelated) between sexes, allowing independent evolution of heat shock tolerance in males and females. These findings give support to the hypothesis that the evolution of sexual dimorphism can be influenced by the environments experienced during development.     

Take-off performance under optimal and suboptimal thermal conditions in the butterfly <Emphasis Type="Italic">Pararge aegeria</Emphasis>

Realized fitness in a fluctuating environment depends on the capacity of an ectothermic organism to function at different temperatures. Flying heliotherms like butterflies use flight for almost all activities like mate location, foraging and host plant searching and oviposition. Several studies tested the importance of ambient temperature, thermoregulation and butterfly activity. Here, we test the influence of variation in flight morphology in interaction with differences in body temperature on locomotor performance, which has not been thoroughly examined so far. Take-off free flight performance was tested at two different body temperatures in males and females of the speckled wood butterfly Pararge aegeria. We found that both males and females accelerated faster at the optimal body temperature compared to the suboptimal one. The multivariate analyses showed significant sex-specific contributions of flight morphology, body temperature treatment and feeding load to explain variation in acceleration performance. Female and male butterflies with a large relative thorax (i.e. flight muscle investment) mass and large, slender wings (i.e. aspect ratio) accelerated fast at optimal temperature. However, high aspect ratio individuals accelerated slowly at suboptimal temperature. Females of low body mass accelerated fast at optimal, but slowly at suboptimal body temperature. In males, there was an interaction effect between body and relative thorax mass: light males with high relative thorax mass had higher performance than males with a low relative thorax mass. In addition, relative distance to the centre of forewing area was positively related to acceleration at both temperatures in males. Males and females with higher feeding loads had lower levels of acceleration. Finally, males that were able to accelerate fast under both temperatures, had a highly significantly heavier relative thorax, lower body and abdomen mass. More generally, this study shows that the significance of butterfly flight morphology in terms of flight performance is at least partially dependent on body temperature.     

Evidence of different thermoregulatory mechanisms between two sympatric Scarabaeus species using infrared thermography and micro-computer tomography

In endotherms insects, the thermoregulatory mechanisms modulate heat transfer from the thorax to the abdomen to avoid overheating or cooling in order to obtain a prolonged flight performance. Scarabaeus sacer and S. cicatricosus, two sympatric species with the same habitat and food preferences, showed daily temporal segregation with S. cicatricosus being more active during warmer hours of the day in opposition to S. sacer who avoid it. In the case of S. sacer, their endothermy pattern suggested an adaptive capacity for thorax heat retention. In S. cicatricosus, an active 'heat exchanger' mechanism was suggested. However, no empirical evidence had been documented until now. Thermographic sequences recorded during flight performance showed evidence of the existence of both thermoregulatory mechanisms. In S. sacer, infrared sequences showed a possible heat insulator (passive thermal window), which prevents heat transfer from meso- and metathorax to the abdomen during flight. In S. cicatricosus, infrared sequences revealed clear and effective heat flow between the thorax and abdomen (abdominal heat transfer) that should be considered the main mechanism of thermoregulation. This was related to a subsequent increase in abdominal pumping (as a cooling mechanism) during flight. Computer microtomography scanning, anatomical dissections and internal air volume measurements showed two possible heat retention mechanisms for S. sacer; the abdominal air sacs and the development of the internal abdominal sternites that could explain the thermoregulation between thorax and abdomen. Our results suggest that interspecific interactions between sympatric species are regulated by very different mechanisms. These mechanisms create unique thermal niches for the different species, thereby preventing competition and modulating spatio-temporal distribution and the composition of dung beetle assemblages.     

Thermoregulation of foraging honeybees on flowering plants: seasonal variability and influence of radiative heat gain

1. During nectar and pollen foraging in a temperate climate, honeybees are exposed to a broad range of ambient temperatures, challenging their thermoregulatory ability. The body temperature that the bees exhibit results from endothermic heat production, exogenous heat gain from solar radiation, and heat loss. In addition to profitability of foraging, season was suggested to have a considerable influence on thermoregulation. To assess the relative importance of these factors, the thermoregulatory behaviour of foragers on 33 flowering plants in dependence on season and environmental factors was investigated.2. The bees (Apis mellifera carnica Pollman) were always endothermic. On average, the thorax surface temperature (T(th)) was regulated at a high and rather constant level over a broad range of ambient temperatures (T(th) = 33.7-35.7°C, T(a) = 10-27°C). However, at a certain T(a), T(th) showed a strong variation, depending on the plants from which the bees were foraging. At warmer conditions (T(a) = 27-32°C) the T(th) increased nearly linearly with T(a) to a maximal average level of 42.6 °C. The thorax temperature excess decreased strongly with increasing T(a) (T(th)-T(a) = 21.6 - 3.6°C).3. The bees used the heat gain from solar radiation to elevate the temperature excess of thorax, head, and abdomen. Seasonal dependance was reflected in a 2.7 °C higher mean T(th) in the spring than in the summer. An anova revealed that season had the greatest effect on T(th), followed by T(a) and radiation.4. It was presumed the foragers' motivational status to be the main factor responsible for the variation of T(th) between seasons and different plants.