Novel technology to provide an enriched therapeutic cell concentrate from bone marrow aspirate

Current strategies to repair fractures rely on orthopaedic surgeons harvesting bone from one area of the body, typically pelvis and transferring it to the fracture site. The amount of tissue available is therefore limited, requiring a second surgical procedure and often causing the patient long term pain. An alternative approach is utilise therapeutic cells contained within bone marrow aspirate during the primary procedure. The number of therapeutic cells within a fresh aspirate is insufficient to provide clinically acceptable bone healing in a timescale that is satisfactory to the surgeon and the patient. Therefore methods to efficiently concentrate bone marrow in the clinical setting are required. Centrifugation is the current method of choice but has limitations in that it requires large capital equipment, servicing and there are potential issues of tissue contamination. We have developed a novel, acoustically‐assisted filtration device that addresses these limitations, delivering a concentrated bone marrow in a point of care, single use, fully disposable, compact device. An additional advantage is that the level of concentration required can be specified by the end user. The resulting bone marrow concentrate has been characterised in terms of cell number, viability and osteogenic potential using flow cytometry and alkaline phosphatase assay. When compared to recent clinical studies using bone marrow to repair non‐union fractures, the findings from our work suggest that the bone marrow concentrate is likely to be highly therapeutic and clinically efficacious as a bone fracture repair strategy. A product concept for use in the clinical setting is presented. © 2010 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Biotechnol. Prog., 2010     

Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells

Following the identification of bone marrow multipotent cells that could adhere to plastic and differentiate along numerous mesenchymal lineages in vitro, a considerable effort has been invested in characterizing and expanding these cells, which are now called “mesenchymal stem cells” (MSCs), in vitro. Over the years, numerous lines of evidence have been provided in support of their plasticity, their extraordinary immunomodulatory properties, their potential use for tissue engineering purposes, as well as their ability to be recruited to sites of injury, where they might contribute a “natural in vivo system for tissue repair.” Moreover, some studies have attempted the characterization of their cell‐surface specific antigens and of their anatomical location in vivo. Lastly, it has been shown that similar cells could be also isolated from organs other than the bone marrow. Despite this impressive body of investigations, numerous questions related to the developmental origin of these cells, their proposed pluripotency, and their role in bone modeling and remodeling and tissue repair in vivo are still largely unanswered. In addition, both a systematic phenotypic in vivo characterization of the MSC population and the development of a reproducible and faithful in vivo assay that would test the ability of MSCs to self‐renew, proliferate, and differentiate in vivo are just beginning. This brief review summarizes the current knowledge in the field of study of MSCs and the outstanding questions. J. Cell. Biochem. 109: 277–282, 2010. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Regenerative cell therapy and pharmacotherapeutic intervention in heart failure

Regenerative medicine represents a promising perspective on therapeutic angiogenesis in patients with cardiovascular disease, including heart failure. However, previous or ongoing clinical trials show ambiguous outcomes with respect to the benefit of regenerative therapy by means of bone marrow stem cell infusion in myocardial infarction patients. Therefore, it is necessary to set up a rational therapeutic strategy in the treatment of congestive heart failure. Chemokines, cytokines and growth factors, as well as pharmaceutical agents, may have an impact on endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) physiology and thus can provide targets for pharmacological intervention. Indeed, EPCs and stem cell niches both in bone marrow and myocardial tissue can be treated as an integral target for recruitment of EPCs from the bone marrow to the cardiac ischaemic niche. In this article, we individually place the signalling factors in their specified context, and explain their roles in the various phases of neovascularisation (see Part 1). (Neth Heart J 2008;16:337-43.)     

P62 deficiency shifts mesenchymal/stromal stem cell commitment toward adipogenesis and disrupts bone marrow homeostasis in aged mice

With advancing age have been observed bone and bone marrow phenotypic alterations due to the impaired bone tissue homeostatic features, involving bone remodeling, and bone marrow niche ontogeny. The complex “inflamm-aging” pathological scenario that culminates with osteopenia and mesenchymal/stromal and hematopoietic stem cell commitment breakdown, is controlled by cellular and molecular intramural components comprising adapter proteins such as the sequestosome 1 (p62/SQSTM1). p62, a “multiway function” protein, has been reported as an effective anti-inflammatory, bone-building factor. In this view, we considered for the first time the involvement of p62 in aging bone and bone marrow of 1 year and 2 years p62^−/− mice. Interestingly, p62 deficiency provoked accelerated osteopenia and impaired niche operational activities within the bone marrow. The above findings unearthed the importance of p62 in mesenchymal stem cell maintenance/differentiation schedule in old animals and provide, at least in part, a mechanistic scenario of p62 action.     

应用骨髓干细胞治疗肝硬化研究进展

随着干细胞研究的深入和技术的发展,再生医学的干细胞疗法治疗肝脏疾病已成为研究热点。骨髓来源造血干细胞和间充质干细胞等在肝脏疾病治疗方面有巨大潜力。骨髓干细胞参与肝纤维化与肝硬化修复主要包括迁移、归巢与转化等过程,并需要多种细胞因子和趋化因子的协同作用促进肝细胞再生与减轻肝纤维化。本文拟对骨髓干细胞治疗肝硬化的最新研究进展进行综述。     

Engineering of osteoinductive grafts by isolation and expansion of ovine bone marrow stromal cells directly on 3D ceramic scaffolds

In this work, we investigated whether osteoinductive constructs can be generated by isolation and expansion of sheep bone marrow stromal cells (BMSC) directly within three-dimensional (3D) ceramic scaffolds, bypassing the typical phase of monolayer (2D) expansion prior to scaffold loading. Nucleated cells from sheep bone marrow aspirate were seeded into 3D ceramic scaffolds either by static loading or under perfusion flow and maintained in culture for up to 14 days. The resulting constructs were exposed to enzymatic treatment to assess the number and lineage of extracted cells, or implanted subcutaneously in nude mice to test their capacity to induce bone formation. As a control, BMSC expanded in monolayer for 14 days were also seeded into the scaffolds and implanted. BMSC could be isolated and expanded directly in the 3D ceramic scaffolds, although they proliferated slower than in 2D. Upon ectopic implantation, the resulting constructs formed a higher amount of bone tissue than constructs loaded with the same number of 2D-expanded cells. Constructs cultivated for 14 days generated significantly more bone tissue than those cultured for 3 days. No differences in bone formation were found between samples seeded by static loading or under perfusion. In conclusion, the culture of bone marrow nucleated cells directly on 3D ceramic scaffolds represents a promising approach to expand BMSC and streamline the engineering of osteoinductive grafts.     

New insights on the reparative cells in bone regeneration and repair

Bone possesses a remarkable repair capacity to regenerate completely without scar tissue formation. This unique characteristic, expressed during bone development, maintenance and injury (fracture) healing, is performed by the reparative cells including skeletal stem cells (SSCs) and their descendants. However, the identity and functional roles of SSCs remain controversial due to technological difficulties and the heterogeneity and plasticity of SSCs. Moreover, for many years, there has been a biased view that bone marrow is the main cell source for bone repair. Together, these limitations have greatly hampered our understanding of these important cell populations and their potential applications in the treatment of fractures and skeletal diseases. Here, we reanalyse and summarize current understanding of the reparative cells in bone regeneration and repair and outline recent progress in this area, with a particular emphasis on the temporal and spatial process of fracture healing, the sources of reparative cells, an updated definition of SSCs, and markers of skeletal stem/progenitor cells contributing to the repair of craniofacial and long bones, as well as the debate between SSCs and pericytes. Finally, we also discuss the existing problems, emerging novel technologies and future research directions in this field.     

Therapeutic potential of adult bone marrow‐derived mesenchymal stem cells in diseases of the skeleton

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are the most popular among the adult stem cells in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Since their discovery and functional characterization in the late 1960s and early 1970s, MSCs or MSC‐like cells have been obtained from various mesodermal and non‐mesodermal tissues, although majority of the therapeutic applications involved bone marrow‐derived MSCs. Based on its mesenchymal origin, it was predicted earlier that MSCs only can differentiate into mesengenic lineages like bone, cartilage, fat or muscle. However, varied isolation and cell culturing methods identified subsets of MSCs in the bone marrow which not only differentiated into mesenchymal lineages, but also into ectodermal and endodermal derivatives. Although, true pluripotent status is yet to be established, MSCs have been successfully used in bone and cartilage regeneration in osteoporotic fracture and arthritis, respectively, and in the repair of cardiac tissue following myocardial infarction. Immunosuppressive properties of MSCs extend utility of MSCs to reduce complications of graft versus host disease and rheumatoid arthritis. Homing of MSCs to sites of tissue injury, including tumor, is well established. In addition to their ability in tissue regeneration, MSCs can be genetically engineered ex vivo for delivery of therapeutic molecule(s) to the sites of injury or tumorigenesis as cell therapy vehicles. MSCs tend to lose surface receptors for trafficking and have been reported to develop sarcoma in long‐term culture. In this article, we reviewed the current status of MSCs with special emphasis to therapeutic application in bone‐related diseases. J. Cell. Biochem. 111: 249–257, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

A novel purification method for multipotential skeletal stem cells

At least some cells within bone marrow stromal populations are multipotential (i.e., differentiate in vitro into osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and adipocytes) and thus designated skeletal stem cells (SSCs) or mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) amongst other names. Recently, a subpopulation of stromal cells, notably osteoblasts or their progenitors, has been identified as a definitive regulatory component of the hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) niche. Thus, the development of methods for purifying not only SSCs but cells comprising the HSC niche is of interest. Here, we report a method for purifying a novel bone marrow‐derived population with a high frequency of osteoprogenitors and high expression levels of osteoblast differentiation markers (highly purified osteoprogenitors (HipOPs)) as well as markers of the bone niche for HSCs. In vivo transplantation experiments demonstrated that donor HipOPs differentiated into not only osteoblasts, osteocytes and cells around sinusoids but also hematopoietic cells. Thus, HipOPs represent a novel population for simultaneous reconstruction of bone and bone marrow microenvironments. J. Cell. Biochem. 108: 368–377, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Osteogenic Potency of Nacre on Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Nacre seashell is a natural osteoinductive biomaterial with strong effects on osteoprogenitors, osteoblasts, and osteoclasts during bone tissue formation and morphogenesis. Although nacre has shown, in one study, to induce bridging of new bone across large non-union bone defects in 8 individual human patients, there have been no succeeding human surgical studies to confirm this outstanding potency. But the molecular mechanisms associated with nacre osteoinduction and the influence on bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSC’s), skeletal stem cells or bone marrow stromal cells remain elusive. In this study we highlight the phenotypic and biochemical effects of Pinctada maxima nacre chips and the global nacre soluble protein matrix (SPM) on primary human bone marrow-derived stromal cells (hBMSCs) in vitro. In static co-culture with nacre chips, the hBMSCs secreted Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) at levels that exceeded bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP-2) treatment. Concentrated preparation of SPM applied to Stro-1 selected hBMSC’s led to rapid ALP secretions, at concentrations exceeding the untreated controls even in osteogenic conditions. Within 21 days the same population of Stro-1 selected hBMSCs proliferated and secreted collagens I–IV, indicating the premature onset of an osteoblast phenotype. The same SPM was found to promote unselected hBMSC differentiation with osteocalcin detected at 7 days, and proliferation increased at 7 days in a dose-dependent manner. In conclusion, nacre particles and nacre SPM induced the early stages of human bone cell differentiation, indicating that they may be promising soluble factors with osteoinductive capacity in primary human bone cell progenitors such as, hBMSC’s.     

Ginsenoside Rg1 improves bone marrow haematopoietic activity via extramedullary haematopoiesis of the spleen

Cyclophosphamide (CY) is a chemotherapeutic agent used for cancer and immunological diseases. It induces cytotoxicity of bone marrow and causes myelosuppression and extramedullary haematopoiesis (EMH) in treated patients. EMH is characterized with the emergence of multipotent haematopoietic progenitors most likely in the spleen and liver. Previous studies indicated that a Chinese medicine, ginsenoside Rg1, confers a significant effect to elevate the number of lineage (Lin⁻) Sca-1⁺ c-Kit⁺ haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) and restore the function of bone marrow in CY-treated myelosuppressed mice. However, whether the amelioration of bone marrow by Rg1 accompanies an alleviation of EMH in the spleen was still unknown. In our study, the cellularity and weight of the spleen were significantly reduced after Rg1 treatment in CY-treated mice. Moreover, the number of c-Kit⁺ HSPCs was significantly decreased but not as a result of apoptosis, indicating that Rg1 alleviated EMH of the spleen induced by CY. Unexpectedly, the proliferation activity of c-Kit⁺ HSPCs was only up-regulated in the spleen, but not in the bone marrow, after Rg1 treatment in CY-treated mice. We also found that a fraction of c-Kit⁺/CD45⁺ HSPCs was simultaneously increased in the circulation after Rg1 treatment. Interestingly, the effects of Rg1 on the elevation of HSPCs in bone marrow and in the peripheral blood were suppressed in CY-treated splenectomized mice. These results demonstrated that Rg1 improves myelosuppression induced by CY through its action on the proliferation of HSPCs in EMH of the spleen and migration of HSPCs from the spleen to the bone marrow.     

Bone marrow to liver: the blood of Prometheus

The existence of hepatic stem or progenitor cells has been controversial for decades, though it was presumed that if such cells existed, they would lie within the liver. There is now consensus, however, that not only do facultative hepatic stem cells exist within the liver, but also that cells from extra-hepatic sites, in particular the bone marrow, can contribute to hepatocyte and cholangiocyte regeneration. Despite confidence that engraftment of marrow cells in the liver occurs, the mechanistic details of this process remain poorly understood. Moreover, the physiological importance and therapeutic utility of this phenomenon remains controversial.     

骨髓间充质干细胞外泌体中miRNA在视网膜新生血管形成中的作用及机制

视网膜血管疾病如早产儿视网膜病变、糖尿病视网膜病变和视网膜静脉阻塞等以异常增生的视网膜新生血管为主要病理表现。骨髓间充质干细胞来源外泌体通过旁分泌作用传递生物活性分子介导细胞间的物质与信息交换。其中,miRNA等内容物在传递信息中起关键作用,可调控缺血缺氧环境下内皮细胞的增殖、管腔形成和新生血管的形成。并且能够通过血视网膜屏障而不引起免疫、炎症反应,在眼科疾病治疗中极具潜力。本文总结骨髓间充质干细胞衍生外泌体中miRNA在视网膜新生血管形成中的作用和可能的作用机制,以期为外泌体在眼科疾病诊治中的应用拓宽新思路。     

Transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells from the peripheral blood

Hematopoietic stem cells can be collected from the peripheral blood. These hematopoietic stem cells (HSC), or better progenitor cells, are mostly expressed as the percentage of cells than react with CD34 antibodies or that form colonies in semi-solid medium (CFU-GM). Under steady-state conditions the number of HSC is much lower in peripheral blood than in bone marrow. Mobilization with chemotherapy and/or growth factors may lead to a concentration of HSC in the peripheral blood that equals or exceeds the concentration in bone marrow. Transplantation of HSC from the peripheral blood results in faster hematologic recovery than HSC from bone marrow. This decreases the risk of infection and the need for blood-product support. For autologous stem-cell transplantation (SCT), the use of peripheral blood cells has completely replaced the use of bone marrow. For allogeneic SCT, on the other hand, the situation is more complex. Since peripheral blood contains more T-lymphocytes than bone marow, the use of HSC from the peripheral blood increases the risk of graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic SCT. For patients with goodrisk leukemia, bone marrow is still preferred, but for patients with high-risk disease, peripheral blood SCT has become the therapy of choice.     

Isolation and therapeutic potential of human haemopoietic stem cells

The haemopoietic stem cell (HSC) has long been regarded as an archetypal, tissue specific, stem cell, capable of completely regenerating haemopoiesis after myeloablation. It has proved relatively easy to harvest HSC, from bone marrow or peripheral blood. In turn, isolation of these cells has allowed therapeutic stem cell transplantation protocols to be developed, that capitalise on their prodigious self renewal and proliferative capabilities. Ex vivo approaches have been described to isolate, genetically manipulateand expand pluripotent stem cell subsets. These techniques have been crucial to the development of gene therapy, and may allow adults to enjoy the potential advantages of cord blood transplantation. Recently, huge conceptual changes have occurred in stem cell biology. In particular, the dogma that, in adults, stem cells are exclusively tissue restricted has been questioned and there is great excitement surrounding the potential plasticity of these cells, with the profound implications that this has, for developing novel cellular therapies. Mesenchymal stem cells, multipotent adult progenitor cells and embryonic stem cells are potential sources of cells for transplantation purposes. These cells may be directed toproduce HSC, in vitro and in the future may be used for therapeutic, or drug development, purposes. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Comparison of gingiva‐derived and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells for osteogenesis

Presently, bone marrow is considered as a prime source of mesenchymal stem cells; however, there are some drawbacks and limitations. Compared with other mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) sources, gingiva‐derived mesenchymal stem cells (GMSCs) are abundant and easy to obtain through minimally invasive cell isolation techniques. In this study, MSCs derived from gingiva and bone marrow were isolated and cultured from mice. GMSCs were characterized by osteogenic, adipogenic and chondrogenic differentiation, and flow cytometry. Compared with bone marrow MSCs (BMSCs), the proliferation capacity was judged by CCK‐8 proliferation assay. Osteogenic differentiation was assessed by ALP staining, ALP assay and Alizarin red staining. RT‐qPCR was performed for ALP, OCN, OSX and Runx2. The results indicated that GMSCs showed higher proliferative capacity than BMSCs. GMSCs turned more positive for ALP and formed a more number of mineralized nodules than BMSCs after osteogenic induction. RT‐qPCR revealed that the expression of ALP, OCN, OSX and Runx2 was significantly increased in the GMSCs compared with that in BMSCs. Moreover, it was found that the number of CD90‐positive cells in GMSCs elevated more than that of BMSCs during osteogenic induction. Taking these results together, it was indicated that GMSCs might be a promising source in the future bone tissue engineering.