Administration-Time Differences in Effects of Hypertension Medications on Ambulatory Blood Pressure Regulation

Specific features of the 24-h blood pressure (BP) pattern are linked to progressive injury of target tissues and risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events. Several studies have consistently shown an association between blunted asleep BP decline and risk of fatal and nonfatal CVD events. Thus, there is growing focus on ways to properly control BP during nighttime sleep as well as during daytime activity. One strategy, termed chronotherapy, entails the timing of hypertension medications to endogenous circadian rhythm determinants of the 24-h BP pattern. Significant and clinically meaningful treatment-time differences in the beneficial and/or adverse effects of at least six different classes of hypertension medications, and their combinations, are now known. Generally, calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are more effective with bedtime than morning dosing, and for dihydropyridine derivatives bedtime dosing significantly reduces risk of peripheral edema. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system is highly circadian rhythmic and activates during nighttime sleep. Accordingly, evening/bedtime ingestion of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) benazepril, captopril, enalapril, lisinopril, perindopril, quinapril, ramipril, spirapril, trandolapril, and zofenopril exerts more marked effect on the asleep than awake systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) BP means. Likewise, the bedtime, in comparison with morning, ingestion schedule of the angiotensin-II receptor blockers (ARBs irbesartan, olmesartan, telmisartan, and valsartan exerts greater therapeutic effect on asleep BP, plus significant increase in the sleep-time relative BP decline, with the additional benefit, independent of drug terminal half-life, of converting the 24-h BP profile into a more normal dipping pattern. This is the case also for the bedtime versus upon-awakening regimen of combination ARB-CCB, ACEI-CCB, and ARB-diuretic medications. The chronotherapy of conventional hypertension medications constitutes a new and cost-effective strategy for enhancing the control of daytime and nighttime SBP and DBP levels, normalizing the dipping status of their 24-h patterning, and potentially reducing the risk of CVD events and end-organ injury, for example, of the blood vessels and tissues of the heart, brain, kidney, and retina. (Author correspondence: rhermida@uvigo.es)     

Administration‐Time‐Dependent Effects of Olmesartan on the Ambulatory Blood Pressure of Essential Hypertension Patients

Previous studies established that a single daily dose of olmesartan remains effective for the entire 24 h without alteration of the day‐night blood pressure (BP) pattern. On the other hand, the administration of valsartan or telmisartan at bedtime, as opposed to upon wakening, improves the sleep‐time relative BP decline toward a greater dipper pattern without loss of 24 h efficacy. Yet to be determined is whether this administration‐time‐dependent efficacy is a class‐related feature, characteristic of all angiotensin‐receptor‐blocker (ARB) medications. We studied 123 grade 1 and 2 hypertensive patients, 46.6±12.3 yrs of age, randomly assigned to receive olmesartan (20 mg/day) as a monotherapy either upon awakening or at bedtime for three months. BP was measured by ambulatory monitoring for 48 consecutive hours before and after treatment. The 24 h BP reduction was similar for both treatment times. Administration of olmesartan at bedtime, however, was significantly more efficient than morning administration in reducing the nocturnal BP mean. The sleep‐time relative BP decline was slightly reduced with olmesartan ingestion upon awakening but significantly increased with ingestion at bedtime, thus reducing the prevalence of non‐dipping from baseline by 48%. Olmesartan administration at bedtime, as opposed to in the morning, improved the awake/asleep BP ratio toward a greater dipper pattern without loss of 24 h efficacy. Nocturnal BP regulation was significantly better achieved with bedtime as compared to morning dosing of olmesartan. These effects are comparable to those previously reported for valsartan and telmisartan, thus suggesting that they may be class‐related features of ARB medications in spite of differences in their half‐life kinetics. These administration‐time‐dependent effects should be taken into account when prescribing ARB medications for treatment of essential hypertension     

Comparison between perindopril and nifedipine in hypertensive and normotensive diabetic patients with microalbuminuria. Melbourne Diabetic Nephropathy Study Group.

OBJECTIVE--To compare the efficacy of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition with calcium antagonism in diabetic patients with microalbuminuria. DESIGN--Randomised study of diabetic patients with microalbuminuria treated with perindopril or nifedipine for 12 months and monitored for one or three months after stopping treatment depending on whether they were hypertensive or normotensive. Patients were randomised separately according to whether they were hypertensive or normotensive. SETTING--Diabetic clinics in three university teaching hospitals. PATIENTS--50 diabetic patients with persistent microalbuminuria. In all, 43 completed the study: 30 were normotensive and 13 hypertensive; 19 had type I diabetes and 24 had type II diabetes. INTERVENTIONS--For 12 months 20 patients were given perindopril 2-8 mg daily and 23 were given nifedipine 20-80 mg daily. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Albumin excretion rate, blood pressure, and glomerular filtration rate. RESULTS--Both perindopril and nifedipine significantly reduced mean blood pressure. During treatment there was no significant difference between those treated with perindopril and those treated with nifedipine with respect to albuminuria or mean blood pressure. Stopping treatment with both drugs was associated with a sustained increase in albuminuria and mean blood pressure. There was a significant correlation between mean blood pressure and albuminuria and also between the reduction in mean blood pressure and the decrease in albuminuria during treatment with both drugs. In hypertensive patients both drugs caused significant decreases in mean blood pressure and albuminuria. In normotensive patients there was no significant reduction in albuminuria with either regimen. CONCLUSIONS--In diabetic patients with microalbuminuria blood pressure seems to be an important determinant of urinary albumin excretion. Perindopril and nifedipine have similar effects on urinary albumin excretion, both preventing increases in albuminuria in normotensive patients and decreasing albuminuria in hypertensive patients.     

Effects of ramipril and valsartan on proteinuria and renal function in patients with nondiabetic proteinuria

The renin-angiotensin system is involved in the progression of chronic renal disease of both diabetic and nondiabetic origin. The angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers have been demonstrated to reduce urinary protein excretion and attenuate the development of renal injury. This prospective, randomized, 12-month study assessed the effects of ramipril (N = 23) vs. valsartan (N = 22) vs. combination of ramipril and valsartan (N = 26) on proteinuria, renal function and metabolic profile in 71 patients with nondiabetic proteinuria with normal or slightly impaired renal function. Monotherapy with ramipril or valsartan and combination of these two drugs significantly reduced proteinuria, serum creatinine, cholesterol and triglycerides as well as systolic and diastolic arterial blood pressure. There was no significant difference among three study groups according to reduction of arterial blood pressure, serum cholesterol and triglycerides. At one year, a significant reduction in serum creatinine was recorded in all three study groups, whereas at 3 and 6 months a statistically significant reduction in serum creatinine was only observed in patients on combination therapy. In addition, at 3 months the reduction of proteinuria was significantly greater in patients on combination therapy than in those on either monotherapy. These results indicated the combination therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers to be more efficacious than either monotherapy in reducing proteinuria and serum creatinine level in the first 3 (proteinuria and serum creatinine) or 6 (serum creatinine) months of treatment.     

Comparison of the Efficacy of Morning versus Evening Administration of Olmesartan in Uncomplicated Essential Hypertension

A total of 18 diurnally active subjects with uncomplicated, mild to moderate, essential hypertension were studied to compare the efficacy of the morning versus evening administration of an oral olmesartan medication. After a two‐week, wash‐out/placebo run‐in period, subjects with clinic diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥90 mm Hg and <110 mm Hg began 12 weeks of 20 mg olmesartan medoxomil tablet therapy at 08:00 h daily. Four of the 18 subjects required dose escalation to 40 mg at eight weeks because of clinic DBP≥90 mm Hg. After the 12‐week period of once‐a‐day 08:00 h treatment, subjects were immediately switched to an evening (20:00 h) drug‐ingestion schedule for another 12‐week period without change in dose. Subjects underwent 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) before the initiation of morning treatment and at the end of both the 12‐week morning and evening treatment arms. Dosing time did not exert statistically significant differences on the efficacy of olmesartan: the reduction from baseline in the 24 h mean systolic (SBP) and DBP was, respectively, 18.8 and 14.6 mm Hg with morning dosing and 16.1 and 13.2 mm Hg with evening dosing (p>0.152 between groups). The amplitude of the BP 24 h pattern did not vary with dosing time, indicating full 24 h BP reduction no matter the clock hour of treatment. Although, the BP‐lowering effect was somewhat better with morning dosing, the results of this study suggest that the studied olmesartan medoxomil preparation efficiently reduces BP when ingested in the morning (08:00 h) or evening (20:00 h) in equivalent manner, based on statistical testing, throughout the 24 h.     

Overexpression of proadrenomedullin N-terminal 20 peptide blunts blood pressure rise and attenuates myocardial hypertrophy and fibrosis in hypertensive rats

We developed a transgenic (Tg) rat model that overexpresses human proadrenomedullin N-terminal 20 peptide (PAMP) only and then compared the effects of unilateral nephrectomy followed by a high salt diet for five weeks in Tg and wild-type rats. We found that systolic blood pressure was significantly lower in Tg UNX rats and cardiac hypertrophy and myocardial fibrosis was also attenuated in Tg rats. Evaluation of gene expression showed suppression of cardiac local renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in Tg rat. These results suggest that in addition to reducing blood pressure, PAMP suppresses cardiac hypertrophy through negative regulation of the local cardiac RAS.     

Olmesartan, a novel AT1 antagonist, suppresses cytotoxic myocardial injury in autoimmune heart failure

Some ANG II receptor type 1 (AT(1)) antagonists are reported to inhibit proinflammatory cytokine production in vitro and in vivo. However, the effects of the drugs on autoimmune diseases are unknown. We tested the hypothesis that olmesartan, a novel AT(1) antagonist, ameliorated experimental autoimmune myocarditis (EAM) in rats attributed to the suppression of inflammatory cytokines as well as to the immunomodulatory action of the heart. We administered olmesartan orally at does of 1, 3, and 10 mg.kg(-1).day(-1) to rats with EAM for 3 wk. The results showed that olmesartan decreased blood pressure significantly compared with the untreated group and markedly reduced the severity of myocarditis associated with the decrease of myocardial macrophage, CD4(+), and CD8(+) T-cell expression by comparison of heart wt-to-body wt ratios, pericardial effusion scores, and macroscopic and microscopic scores. Numbers of myocardial interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta)-positive-staining cells (obtained by immunohistochemistry) and quantities of IL-1beta expression (obtained by Western blotting) were significantly lower in rats with EAM given olmesartan treatment compared with rats given vehicle. Cardiac myosin-specific, delayed-type hypersensitivity was significantly lower in olmesartan-treated rats than in control rats. The cytotoxic activities of lymphocytes in rats with EAM treated with olmesartan were reduced compared with untreated control rats. In vitro study showed that both olmesartan and its active metabolite RNH-6270 suppressed IL-1beta production in U-937 cells and cultured myocytes. Olmesartan ameliorates acute EAM in rats. The cardioprotection of olmesartan may be due to suppression of inflammatory cytokines as well as to suppressive effects of cytotoxic myocardial injury in addition to hemodynamic modifications.     

冠心病患者血压控制水平现况

目的：评估目前我国冠心病患者血压控制水平,为冠心病的二级预防及进一步治疗提供指导依据。方法：收集2011~2014年在解放军总医院及海南分院心内科住院治疗的1 230例冠心病患者,分析不同手术方式：经皮冠状动脉介入治疗（PCI）、冠状动脉旁路移植术（CABG）、二级预防用药情况（阿司匹林、氯吡格雷、硝酸酯类、曲美他嗪、尼可地尔、降压药、降糖药、降脂药）及不同生活方式（吸烟、饮酒、锻炼）下血压控制率的差异。结果：①手术方式对血压影响：CABG组男性收缩压及舒张压均低于PCI组及对照组,CABG组女性舒张压低于PCI组。②二级预防药物的使用情况：血压不达标组在曲美他嗪、利尿剂、钙拮抗剂、β受体阻滞剂、ACEI/ARB使用率上显著高于血压正常组。③生活方式情况：吸烟的冠心病患者血压达标率显著低于不吸烟的冠心病患者,是否饮酒及锻炼在血压达标率上没有表现显著差异。结论：冠心病患者血压控制仍不理想,CABG术较PCI术可能更有利于冠心病患者血压的控制,戒烟及提高冠心病二级预防药物的使用率仍是血压控制主要手段。     

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors,left ventricular hypertrophy and fibrosis

From pharmacological investigations and clinical studies, it is known that angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors exhibit additional local actions, which are not related to hemodynamic changes and which cannot be explained only by interference with the renin angiotensin system (RAS) by means of an inhibition of angiotensin II (ANG II) formation. Since ACE is identical to kininase II, which inactivates the nonapeptide bradykinin (BK) and related kinins, potentiation of kinins might be responsible for these additional effects of ACE inhibitors.

1. In rats made hypertensive by aortic banding, the effect of ramipril in left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) was investigated. Ramipril in the antihypertensive dose of 1 mg/kg/day for 6 weeks prevented the increase in blood pressure and the development of LVH. The low dose of ramipril (10 μg/kg/day for 6 weeks) had no effect on the increase in blood pressure or on plasma ACE activity but also prevented LVH after aortic banding. The antihypertrophic effect of the higher and lower doses of ramipril, as well as the antihypertensive action of the higher dose of ramipril, was abolished by coadmistration of the kinin receptor antagonist icatibant. In the regression study the antihypertrophic actions of ramipril were not blocked by the kinin receptor antagonist. Chronic administration of BK had similar beneficial effects in a prevention study which were abolished by icatibant and N^G-nitro-L-arginine (L-NNA). In a one year study the high and low dose of ramipril prevented LVH and fibrosis. Ramipril had an early direct effect in hypertensive rats on the mRNA expression for myocardial collagen I and III, unrelated to its blood pressure lowering effect.
2. In spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) the preventive effects of chronic treatment with ramipril on myocardial LVH was investigated. SHR were treated in utero and, subsequently, up to 20 weeks of age with a high dose (1 mg/kg/day) or with a low dose (10 μg/kg/day) of ramipril. Animals on a high dose remained normotensive, whereas those on a low dose developed hypertension in parallel to vehicle-treated controls. Left ventricular mass was reduced only in high-dose-treated, but not in low-dose treated animals but both groups revealed an increase in myocardial capillary length density. In SHR stroke prone animals cardiac function and metabolism was improved by ramipril and abolished by coadministration of icatibant. In contrast to the prevention studies, in a regression study ramipril reduced cardiac hypertrophy also by low dose treatment.
3. In rats chronic nitric oxide (NO) inhibition by N^G-nitro-L-arginine-methyl ester (L-NAME) treatment induced hypertension and LVH. Ramipril protected against blood pressure increase and partially against myocardial hypertrophy.

These experimental findings in different models of LVH characterise ACE inhibitors as remarkable antihypertrophic and antifibrotic substances.     

Effects of Different Once-a-Day Medications on 24-Hour Blood Pressure Recordings in Hypertensives

Compliance with antihypertensive treatment can be increased by using medications that are taken only once daily. There is, however, concern as to whether the efficacy of such drugs is sufficient to cover 24 h. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is an ideal technique to assess the effect of this kind of drug and to determine over- or undertreatment. In this study three drugs were examined as once-a-day preparations. Thirty-six patients were treated with three different doses of bisoprolol, as an example of the β,-selective beta-blockers; 12 patients were treated with a combination of the AChE-inhibitor enalapril and hydrochlorothiazide; eight patients were treated with nifedipine once per day, a new galenic form of nifedipine, as an example of the calcium-channel blockers. In each group we saw a significant downward shift over the entire 24-h curve. Our results also show that using 24-h blood pressure monitoring devices can help establish an appropriate dose, avoid over- and undertreatment, and control the total burden of the patient.     

A new look at the renin-angiotensin system--focusing on the vascular system

The renin–angiotensin system (RAS), critically involved in the control of blood pressure and volume homeostasis, is a dual system comprising a circulating component and a local tissue component. The rate limiting enzyme is renin, which in the circulating RAS derives from the kidney to generate Ang II, which in turn regulates cardiovascular function by binding to AT₁ and AT₂ receptors on cardiac, renal and vascular cells. The tissue RAS can operate independently of the circulating RAS and may be activated even when the circulating RAS is suppressed or normal. A functional tissue RAS has been identified in brain, kidney, heart, adipose tissue, hematopoietic tissue, gastrointestinal tract, liver, endocrine system and blood vessels. Whereas angiotensinsinogen, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE), Ang I and Ang II are synthesized within these tissues, there is still controversy as to whether renin is produced locally or whether it is taken up from the circulation, possibly by the (pro)renin receptor. This is particularly true in the vascular wall, where expression of renin is very low. The exact function of the vascular RAS remains elusive, but may contribute to fine-tuning of vascular tone and arterial structure and may amplify vascular effects of the circulating RAS, particularly in pathological conditions, such as in hypertension, atherosclerosis and diabetes. New concepts relating to the vascular RAS have recently been elucidated including: (1) the presence of functionally active Ang-(1-7)-Mas axis in the vascular system, (2) the importance of the RAS in perivascular adipose tissue and cross talk with vessels, and (3) the contribution to vascular RAS of Ang II derived from immune and inflammatory cells within the vascular wall. The present review highlights recent progress in the RAS field, focusing on the tissue system and particularly on the vascular RAS.     

Vitamin D regulation of the renin-angiotensin system

The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) plays a central role in the regulation of blood pressure, electrolyte, and volume homeostasis. Epidemiological and clinical studies have long suggested an association of inadequate sunlight exposure or low serum 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) [1,25(OH)(2)D(3)] levels with high blood pressure and/or high plasma renin activity, but the mechanism is not understood. Our recent discovery that 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) functions as a potent negative endocrine regulator of renin gene expression provides some insights into the mechanism. The concept of vitamin D regulation of blood pressure through the RAS opens a new avenue to our understanding of the physiological functions of the vitamin D endocrine system, and provides a basis for exploring the potential use of vitamin D analogues in prevention and treatment of hypertension.     

Valsartan chronotherapy reverts the non-dipper pattern and improves blood pressure control through mediation of circadian rhythms of the renin-angiotensin system in spontaneous hypertension rats

ABSTRACT

Background: Numerous clinical studies have evaluated valsartan and found more efficacious control of blood pressure (BP) variability when administered before sleep. The treatment leads to improved outcomes when compared to administration upon awakening. The mechanism underlying this etiology is not fully understood. The present study investigates the safety and efficacy of asleep administration of valsartan in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) with a non-dipping blood pressure pattern compared to SHRs receiving administration during awake time. Materials and Methods: 84 Male SHRs and 28 male Wistar-Kyoto rats (WKY) were kept under a strict alternating 12-h light/dark cycle. WKYs were utilized as a non-disease control. Meanwhile, SHRs were randomly divided into three groups: untreated, Valsartan asleep administration (VSA) and Valsartan awake administration (VWA) respectively. The VSA group was treated with valsartan (30 mg/kg/d) after the light onset, while the VWA group was treated with valsartan (30 mg/kg/d) after light offset. Both groups were treated for 6 weeks. Tail artery blood pressure was measured every 4 h via a noninvasive tail cuff blood pressure measurement method. HE and Masson staining were used to evaluate any damage within the target organs. ELISA was used to determine the 24-h plasma renin-angiotensin system (RAS) concentration at 4-h intervals. Results: Based on our findings, VSA significantly reduced 24-h and evening mean BP and restored the abnormal circadian rhythm compared to VWA, which attenuated injuries in the majority of target organs except for the kidneys. Furthermore, VSA was found to activate RAS during the light cycle and inhibit it during the dark cycle. Conversely, VWA was found to deactivate RAS throughout the day which may be related to the circadian BP rhythm. Conclusion: VSA may be more efficacious than VWA in controlling BP, circadian BP rhythm and blood RAS rhythm. Recent cardiovascular outcome investigations substantiate that chronotherapy treatment might be a novel therapeutic strategy for hypertension therapy.

Abbreviations: Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE); Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs); Angiotensin II (ANG II); Analysis of variance (ANOVA); Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs); Blood Pressure (BP); Calcium Antagonists Calcium Channel Blockers (CCB); Chronic kidney diseases (CKD); Sodium carboxyl methyl cellulose (CMC-Na); Cardiac mass index (CMI); Cardiovascular diseases (CVD); Diastolic blood pressure (DBP); Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA); Hematoxylin-eosin (H&E); Kidney mass index (KMI); Liver mass index (LMI); Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP); Plasma renin concentration (PRC); Renin-angiotensin system (RAS); Rennin (REN); Systolic blood pressure (SBP); Student-Newman-Keuls q test (SNK-q test); Spontaneous hypertension rats (SHR); Valsartan asleep Administration (VSA); Valsartan awake Administration (VWA); Wistar-Kyoto (WKY); Mesor (M); Amplitude (A); Phase (φ).     

Blood pressure lowering effects of niacin-bound chromium(III) (NBC) in sucrose-fed rats: renin-angiotensin system

Excessive intake of sugars significantly elevates systolic blood pressure (SBP) in susceptible rats. Although the exact pathological mechanisms behind sugar-induced hypertension are uncertain and may be multiple, disturbances in the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) manifested by elevated circulating levels of angiotensin-2 may be involved. We attempted to confirm that the RAS was significantly involved in sugar-induced BP elevations and examined whether the ability of niacin-bound chromium (NBC) to ameliorate sugar-induced SBP elevations was due, at least in part, through effects on the RAS. Initially, 40 mature Sprague-Dawley rats (SD), male and female, were involved in the study comparing two methods to estimate rat blood pressure indirectly. Then 13 were selected to examine the effects of NBC on the RAS. All rats eventually ingested a diet heavy in sucrose (30% w/w). In addition to blood pressure readings, the following procedures were implemented: insulin and losartan challenges, evaluation of serum ACE activity, measurement of serum angiotensin-2 levels, blood chemistries, and LNAME challenge. While dietary sucrose raised SBP significantly in control, adding NBC to the treatment group lowered it back toward baseline. The treatment group was more sensitive to exogenous insulin challenge and showed decreased activity of the RAS estimated by less lowering of SBP after losartan challenge, decreased serum ACE (angiotensin-converting enzyme) activity, and lower levels of circulating angiotensin-2. The former two parameters showed statistical significance; and the latter, a trend toward statistical significance. A separate group receiving captopril served as a positive control and showed decreased ACE activity and circulating levels of angiotensin-2 compared to the control group. Our data suggest that the RAS plays a significant role in sugar-induced hypertension and that NBC lowers SBP, at least in part, via actions on the RAS. Other findings suggest that the NO system is important in sucrose-induced BP elevations as well.     

New insights and perspectives on intrarenal renin-angiotensin system: focus on intracrine/intracellular angiotensin II

Although renin, the rate-limiting enzyme of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), was first discovered by Robert Tigerstedt and Bergman more than a century ago, the research on the RAS still remains stronger than ever. The RAS, once considered to be an endocrine system, is now widely recognized as dual (circulating and local/tissue) or multiple hormonal systems (endocrine, paracrine and intracrine). In addition to the classical renin/angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE)/angiotensin II (Ang II)/Ang II receptor (AT₁/AT₂) axis, the prorenin/(Pro)renin receptor (PRR)/MAP kinase axis, the ACE2/Ang (1-7)/Mas receptor axis, and the Ang IV/AT₄/insulin-regulated aminopeptidase (IRAP) axis have recently been discovered. Furthermore, the roles of the evolving RAS have been extended far beyond blood pressure control, aldosterone synthesis, and body fluid and electrolyte homeostasis. Indeed, novel actions and underlying signaling mechanisms for each member of the RAS in physiology and diseases are continuously uncovered. However, many challenges still remain in the RAS research field despite of more than one century's research effort. It is expected that the research on the expanded RAS will continue to play a prominent role in cardiovascular, renal and hypertension research. The purpose of this article is to review the progress recently being made in the RAS research, with special emphasis on the local RAS in the kidney and the newly discovered prorenin/PRR/MAP kinase axis, the ACE2/Ang (1-7)/Mas receptor axis, the Ang IV/AT₄/IRAP axis, and intracrine/intracellular Ang II. The improved knowledge of the expanded RAS will help us better understand how the classical renin/ACE/Ang II/AT₁ receptor axis, extracellular and/or intracellular origin, interacts with other novel RAS axes to regulate blood pressure and cardiovascular and kidney function in both physiological and diseased states.     

The potential therapeutic use of renin–angiotensin system inhibitors in the treatment of inflammatory diseases

Inflammation is a normal part of the immune response to injury or infection but its dysregulation promotes the development of inflammatory diseases, which cause considerable human suffering. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents are the most commonly prescribed agents for the treatment of inflammatory diseases, but they are accompanied by a broad range of side effects, including gastrointestinal and cardiovascular events. The renin–angiotensin system (RAS) is traditionally known for its role in blood pressure regulation. However, there is increasing evidence that RAS signaling is also involved in the inflammatory response associated with several disease states. Angiotensin II increases blood pressure by binding to angiotensin type 1 (AT₁) receptor, and direct renin inhibitors, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and AT₁ receptor blockers (ARBs) are clinically used as antihypertensive agents. Recent data suggest that these drugs also have anti-inflammatory effects. Therefore, this review summarizes these recent findings for the efficacy of two of the most widely used antihypertensive drug classes, ACE inhibitors and ARBs, to reduce or treat inflammatory diseases such as atherosclerosis, arthritis, steatohepatitis, colitis, pancreatitis, and nephritis.     

Effects of aliskiren on stroke in rats expressing human renin and angiotensinogen genes

Objective

Pre-treatment with angiotensin receptor blockers is known to improve neurological outcome after stroke. This study investigated for the first time, whether the renin inhibitor aliskiren has similar neuroprotective effects.

Methods

Since aliskiren specifically blocks human renin, double transgenic rats expressing human renin and angiotensinogen genes were used. To achieve a systolic blood pressure of 150 or 130 mmHg animals were treated with aliskiren (7.5 or 12.5 mg/kg*d) or candesartan (1.5 or 10 mg/kg*d) via osmotic minipump starting five days before middle cerebral artery occlusion with reperfusion. Infarct size was determined by magnetic resonance imaging. mRNA of inflammatory marker genes was studied in different brain regions.

Results

The mortality of 33.3% (7 of 21 animals) in the vehicle group was reduced to below 10% by treatment with candesartan or aliskiren (p<0.05). Aliskiren-treated animals had a better neurological outcome 7 days post-ischemia, compared to candesartan (Garcia scale: 9.9±0.7 vs. 7.3±0.7; p<0.05). The reduction of infarct size in the aliskiren group did not reach statistical significance compared to candesartan and vehicle (24 h post-ischemia: 314±81 vs. 377±70 and 403±70 mm³ respectively). Only aliskiren was able to significantly reduce stroke-induced gene expression of CXC chemokine ligand 1, interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha in the ischemic core.

Conclusions

Head-to-head comparison suggests that treatment with aliskiren before and during cerebral ischemia is at least as effective as candesartan in double transgenic rats. The improved neurological outcome in the aliskiren group was blood pressure independent. Whether this effect is due to primary anti-inflammatory mechanisms has to be investigated further.     

Comparison of the efficacy of morning versus evening administration of olmesartan in uncomplicated essential hypertension

A total of 18 diurnally active subjects with uncomplicated, mild to moderate, essential hypertension were studied to compare the efficacy of the morning versus evening administration of an oral olmesartan medication. After a two-week, wash-out/placebo run-in period, subjects with clinic diastolic blood pressure (DBP) > or = 90 mm Hg and <110 mm Hg began 12 weeks of 20 mg olmesartan medoxomil tablet therapy at 08:00 h daily. Four of the 18 subjects required dose escalation to 40 mg at eight weeks because of clinic DBP > or = 90 mm Hg. After the 12-week period of once-a-day 08:00 h treatment, subjects were immediately switched to an evening (20:00 h) drug-ingestion schedule for another 12-week period without change in dose. Subjects underwent 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) before the initiation of morning treatment and at the end of both the 12-week morning and evening treatment arms. Dosing time did not exert statistically significant differences on the efficacy of olmesartan: the reduction from baseline in the 24 h mean systolic (SBP) and DBP was, respectively, 18.8 and 14.6 mm Hg with morning dosing and 16.1 and 13.2 mm Hg with evening dosing (p>0.152 between groups). The amplitude of the BP 24 h pattern did not vary with dosing time, indicating full 24 h BP reduction no matter the clock hour of treatment. Although, the BP-lowering effect was somewhat better with morning dosing, the results of this study suggest that the studied olmesartan medoxomil preparation efficiently reduces BP when ingested in the morning (08:00 h) or evening (20:00 h) in equivalent manner, based on statistical testing, throughout the 24 h.