Safety and Efficacy of Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation or Venous Thromboembolism and End-Stage renal disease on hemodialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundWarfarin is traditionally the drug of choice for stroke prophylaxis or treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis as data on apixaban use is scarce. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of Apixaban in patients with ESRD on hemodialysis when compared with warfarin.MethodsA comprehensive literature search in PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases from inception until Nov 25, 2019, was performed. Studies reporting clinical outcomes comparing Apixaban (2.5 mg BID or 5 mg BID) versus Warfarin in ESRD patients on hemodialysis were included. Mantel-Haenszel risk ratio (RR) random-effects model was used to summarize data.ResultsFour studies (three retrospective and one randomized) with a total of 9862 patients (apixaban = 2,547, warfarin = 7315) met inclusion criteria. The overall mean age was 66.6 ± 3.9 years and mean CHA2DS2-VASc score 4.56 ± 0.58. Apixaban was associated with lower rates of major bleeding (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.45–0.64, p < 0.0001], gastrointestinal (GI) bleed (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.55–0.76, p < 0.0001), intracranial bleed (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.36–0.89, p = 0.01), and stroke/systemic embolism [RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.52–0.83, p = 0.0004] compared with warfarin in patients with ESRD on hemodialysis. There was no significant increased risk of all-cause mortality with the apixaban vs. warfarin (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.41–1.96, p = 0.78).ConclusionApixaban had an overall favorable risk-benefit profile, with significant reductions in ischemic stroke, major bleeding, and intracranial bleeding compared to Warfarin in ESRD patients on hemodialysis with non-valvular AF and/or venous thromboembolism.     

Opium use as an independent risk factor for pancreatic cancer: A case-control study

BackgroundPancreatic cancer (PC) is ranked as the seventh leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. The current study was conducted to explore the correlation between the use of opium and its derivatives (opium) and PC in Iran.MethodsIn this case-control study which was conducted in Kerman province, south east part of Iran; 176 patients with PC, and 352 healthy individuals as the control group were matched in terms of age, sex, and place of residence. A structured questionnaire including questions of opium usage, alcohol usage, cigarette smoking, and diet was used to collect the data. The relation between the use of opium and PC was adjusted for tobacco smoking, education, daily intake of fruit, vegetables, red meat, and hydrogenated fats and analyzed using the conditional logistic regression.ResultsThere was a positive relationship between the opium use and the increased risk of PC (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) = 4.33, 95 % CI: 2.09–8.95), which was even stronger than its association with cigarette smoking (AOR = 1.67, 95 % CI: 0.86–3.24), although their difference was not statistically significant. A significant dose-response relation was detected between the use of opium; as the relation was stronger in heavy users (AOR low users = 4.93, 95 % CI: 1.79–13.54 and AOR heavy users = 5.10, 95 % CI: 2.10−12.35). Moreover, PC was higher among participants starting the use of opium at a younger age than those who started opium at an older age (AOR = 8.03, 95 % CI: 3.19–20.23).ConclusionThis study demonstrated that opium use is associated with a high and strong risk of PC as an independent risk factor. Further studies should be done to reduce the use of opium in Iran and other world countries.     

Impact of coronavirus disease 2019 on lung cancer patients: A meta-analysis

BackgroundThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic poses a great challenge to the treatment of lung cancer patients.Materials and methodsThe PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched for studies published before March 15, 2022, and Stata 14.0 software was used to perform a meta-analysis with a random-effects model. The odds ratio (OR) along with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) was reported.ResultsOur meta-analysis included 80 articles with 318,352 patients involved. The proportion of lung cancer patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was 2.4% (95% CI: 0.02–0.03) prior to the Omicron variant outbreak. Among COVID-19 patients, those with lung cancer showed a higher mortality rate than those with other types of malignant solid tumors (OR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.61–2.06) and non-cancer patients (OR = 4.67, 95% CI: 3.61–6.05); however, no significant difference was observed in the mortality rate between patients with lung cancer and those with hematologic malignancies (OR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.85–1.33). SARS-CoV-2 infection significantly increased the mortality rate in lung cancer patients (OR = 8.94, 95% CI: 6.50–12.31). By contrast, the all-cause mortality rate in lung cancer patients (OR = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.69–1.57) and the proportion of patients diagnosed with advanced lung cancer (OR = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.85–1.27) did not significantly change before and after the pandemic.ConclusionsMore attention should be paid on improving the health of lung cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.     

Efficacy and Safety of Oral Antidiabetic Drugs in Comparison to Insulin in Treating Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis

Objective

To assess the efficacy and safety of oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in comparison to insulin.

Methods

A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted. The efficacy and safety of OADs in comparison to insulin in GDM patients were explored. Studies were identified by conducting a literature search using the electronic databases of Medline, CENTRAL, CINAHL, LILACS, Scopus and Web of Science in addition to conducting hand search of relevant journals from inception until October 2013.

Results

Thirteen studies involving 2,151 patients met the inclusion criteria. These studies were randomized controlled trials of metformin and glyburide in comparison to insulin therapy. Our results indicated a significant increase in the risk for preterm births (RR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.04–2.19, p = 0.03) with metformin compared to insulin. However, a significant decrease in the risk for gestational hypertension (RR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.31–0.91, p = 0.02) was found. Postprandial glucose levels also decreased significantly in patients receiving metformin (MD, −2.47 mg/dL; 95% CI, −4.00, −0.94, p = 0.002). There was no significant difference between the two groups for the remaining outcomes. There were significant increases in the risks of macrosomia (RR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.18–4.63, p = 0.03) and neonatal hypoglycemia (RR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.27–3.34, p = 0.005) in the glyburide group compared to insulin whereas results for the other analyzed outcomes remained non-significant.

Conclusion

The available evidence suggests favorable effects of metformin in treating GDM patients. Metformin seems to be an efficacious alternative to insulin and a better choice than glyburide especially those with mild form of disease.     

No association between educational level and pancreatic cancer incidence in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition

Introduction: Until now, studies examining the relationship between socioeconomic status and pancreatic cancer incidence have been inconclusive. Aim: To prospectively investigate to what extent pancreatic cancer incidence varies according to educational level within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study. Methods: In the EPIC study, socioeconomic status at baseline was measured using the highest level of education attained. Hazard ratios by educational level and a summary index, the relative indices of inequality (RII), were estimated using Cox regression models stratified by age, gender, and center and adjusted for known risk factors. In addition, we conducted separate analyses by age, gender and geographical region. Results: Within the source population of 407, 944 individuals at baseline, 490 first incident primary pancreatic adenocarcinoma cases were identified in 9 European countries. The crude difference in risk of pancreatic cancer according to level of education was small and not statistically significant (RII = 1.14, 95% CI 0.80–1.62). Adjustment for known risk factors reduced the inequality estimates to only a small extent. In addition, no statistically significant associations were observed for age groups (adjusted RII_{≤ 60 years} = 0.85, 95% CI 0.44–1.64, adjusted RII_{>60 years} = 1.18, 95% CI 0.73–1.90), gender (adjusted RII_male = 1.20, 95% CI 0.68–2.10, adjusted RII_female = 0.96, 95% CI 0.56–1.62) or geographical region (adjusted RII_{Northern Europe} = 1.14, 95% CI 0.81–1.61, adjusted RII_{Middle Europe} = 1.72, 95% CI 0.93–3.19, adjusted RII_{Southern Europe} = 0.75, 95% CI 0.32–1.80). Conclusion: Despite large educational inequalities in many risk factors within the EPIC study, we found no evidence for an association between educational level and the risk of developing pancreatic cancer in this European cohort.     

Smoking and other risk factors for pancreatic cancer: A cohort study in men in Lithuania

Background: Cancer of the pancreas is a relatively rare, but highly fatal cancer worldwide. Cigarette smoking has been recognized as an important risk factor, but the relation to other potential determinants is still inconsistent. We investigated the association between different lifestyle, biological and anthropometric factors and the risk of pancreatic cancer in a prospective population-based cohort study from Kaunas, Lithuania. Methods: Our study included 7132 urban men initially free from any diagnosed cancer, followed for up to 30 years. 77 incident cases of pancreatic cancer were identified. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Results: Compared to never smokers, current smokers had a significantly increased risk of pancreatic cancer, HR was 1.79 (95% CI 1.03–3.09) after adjustment for age, body mass index, education and alcohol consumption. Among smokers, a significant association with higher smoking intensity was shown (≥20 cigarettes/day: HR = 2.60; 95% CI 1.42–4.76, P_trend = 0.046). We also observed a significantly increased risk for ≥30 pack-years of smoking (HR = 2.24; 95% CI 1.12–4.49, P_trend = 0.16) and for age at starting smoking <18 years (HR = 2.29; 95% CI 1.11–4.70, P_trend = 0.43) as compared to never smokers. Alcohol consumption, body mass index and total cholesterol level were not significantly associated with pancreatic cancer. Conclusions: Smoking significantly increases pancreatic cancer incidence and its high prevalence in Lithuania may partly explain high incidence of the disease. No convincing evidence was found that alcohol consumption, body mass index or serum cholesterol level were associated with pancreatic cancer risk, although the assessment was limited by the lack of statistical power.     

Cancer risk associated with the use of valsartan in Korea: A nationwide cohort study

BackgroundDespite valsartan’s widespread use, few studies have explored its potential carcinogenicity. We evaluated the association between valsartan and cancer.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from 2002 to 2015 gathered from the National Health Insurance database. Patients with hypertension aged ≥ 30 who used valsartan or other angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) were included. Eligible patients were those with no prior history of the use of any ARBs, diagnosis of cancer, or organ transplantation in the 4 years predating their first use of the drugs of interest. The primary and secondary outcomes included the occurrence of all cancers and site-specific solid cancers, respectively. After applying propensity score (PS) matching, Cox regression was used to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs).ResultsA total of 1,550,734 individuals were identified as new users of valsartan or other ARBs. Of the 153,047 valsartan users, 16,047 were diagnosed with cancer. No increased risk of overall cancer was observed in valsartan users as compared to other ARB users (aHR = 1.00; 95 % CI, 0.98–1.02). Valsartan was, however, associated with a slightly elevated risk of liver (aHR = 1.09; 95 % CI, 1.01–1.16) and kidney cancer (aHR = 1.11; 95 % CI, 1.02–1.22).ConclusionCompared with other ARBs, valsartan did not increase the risk of overall cancer. A slightly increased risk for some solid cancers was associated with valsartan use, though the absolute rate difference was small.     

Prediction of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism by Clot Lysis Time: A Prospective Cohort Study

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a chronic disease, which tends to recur. Whether an abnormal fibrinolytic system is associated with an increased risk of VTE is unclear. We assessed the relationship between fibrinolytic capacity (reflected by clot lysis time [CLT]) and risk of recurrent VTE. We followed 704 patients (378 women; mean age 48 yrs) with a first unprovoked VTE for an average of 46 months after anticoagulation withdrawal. Patients with natural coagulation inhibitor deficiency, lupus anticoagulant, cancer, homozygosity for factor V Leiden or prothrombin mutation, or requirement for indefinite anticoagulation were excluded. Study endpoint was symptomatic recurrent VTE. For measurement of CLT, a tissue factor-induced clot was lysed by adding tissue-type plasminogen activator. Time between clot formation and lysis was determined by measuring the turbidity.135 (19%) patients had recurrent VTE. For each increase in CLT of 10 minutes, the crude relative risk (RR) of recurrence was 1.13 (95% CI 1.02–1.25; p = 0.02) and was 1.08 (95% CI 0.98–1.20; p = 0.13) after adjustment for age and sex. For women only, the adjusted RR was 1.14 (95% CI, 0.91–1.42, p = 0.22) for each increase in CLT of 10 minutes. CLT values in the 4^th quartile of the female patient population, as compared to values in the 1^st quartile, conferred a risk of recurrence of 3.28 (95% CI, 1.07–10.05; p = 0.04). No association between CLT and recurrence risk was found in men. Hypofibrinolysis as assessed by CLT confers a moderate increase in the risk of recurrent VTE. A weak association between CLT and risk of recurrence was found in women only.     

Bleeding Risk and Mortality of Edoxaban: A Pooled Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Objective(s)

Edoxaban, a factor Xa inhibitor, is a new oral anticoagulant that has been developed as an alternative to vitamin K antagonists. However, its safety remains unexplored.

Methods

Medline, Embase and Web of Science were searched to March 8, 2014 for prospective, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the safety profile of edoxaban with warfarin. Safety outcomes examined included bleeding risk and mortality.

Results

Five trials including 31,262 patients that met the inclusion criteria were pooled. Overall, edoxaban was associated with a significant decrease in major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events [risk ratio (RR) 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74 to 0.82, p<0.001] and any bleeding events [RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.85, p<0.001]. Edoxaban also showed superiority to warfarin both in all-cause mortality [RR 0.92, 95% CI0.85 to0.99, p = 0.02] and cardiovascular mortality [RR 0.87, 95% CI0.79 to 0.96, p = 0.004]. Subgroup analyses indicated that RRs of edoxaban 30, 60 or 120 mg/d were 0.67 (p<0.001), 0.87 (p<0.001) and 3.3 (p = 0.004) respectively in major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding; 0.71 (p<0.001), 0.89 (p<0.001) and 2.29 (p = 0.002) respectively in any bleeding; as well as 0.86 (p = 0.01), 0.87 (p = 0.01) and 0.28 (p = 0.41) respectively in cardiovascular death… Meanwhile, paramount to note that pooled results other than the largest trial showed edoxaban was still associated with a decrease in the rate of major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding event (p = 0.02) and any bleeding (p = 0.002), but neither in all-cause death (p = 0.66) nor cardiovascular death (p = 0.70).

Conclusions

Edoxaban, a novel orally available direct factor Xa inhibitor, seems to have a favorable safety profiles with respect to bleeding risk and non-inferior in mortality when compared to warfarin. Further prospective RCTs are urgently needed to confirm the results of this meta-analysis.     

Hysterectomy and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer by histologic type,endometriosis, and menopausal hormone therapy

BackgroundThis nationwide, register-based case-control study investigated the association between hysterectomy and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer according to histology and by history of endometriosis and menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) use.MethodsFrom the Danish Cancer Registry, all women registered with epithelial ovarian cancer at age 40–79 years during 1998–2016 were identified (n = 6738). Each case was sex- and age-matched to 15 population controls using risk-set sampling. Information on previous hysterectomy on benign indication and potential confounders was retrieved from nationwide registers. Conditional logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between hysterectomy and ovarian cancer according to histology, endometriosis, and use of MHT.ResultsHysterectomy was not associated with risk of epithelial ovarian cancer overall (OR=0.99; 95% CI 0.91 –1.09) but was associated with reduced risk of clear cell ovarian cancer (OR=0.46; 95% CI 0.28–0.78). In stratified analyses, decreased ORs associated with hysterectomy were seen in women with endometriosis (OR=0.74; 95% CI 0.50–1.10) and in non-users of MHT (OR=0.87; 95% CI 0.76–1.01). In contrast, among long-term MHT users, hysterectomy was associated with increased odds for ovarian cancer (OR=1.20; 95% CI 1.03–1.39).ConclusionHysterectomy was not associated with epithelial ovarian cancer overall but with reduced risk of clear cell ovarian cancer. Our findings may suggest a reduced risk of ovarian cancer after hysterectomy in women with endometriosis and in MHT non-users. Interestingly our data pointed to an increased ovarian cancer risk associated with hysterectomy among long-term users of MHT.     

Association between ATM polymorphisms and cancer risk: a meta-analysis

To date, epidemiological studies have assessed the association between Ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) gene polymorphisms and cancer risk, including lung cancer, breast cancer, glioma and pancreatic cancer. However, the results of these studies remain controversial. We aimed to examine the associations between two SNPs (rs664143 and rs664677) and cancer risk by conducting a meta-analysis of case–control studies. A total of 12 publications were included in this meta-analysis, 8 for rs664143 and 7 for rs664677. Overall, rs664143 heterozygote carriers turned out to be associated with cancer risk (OR = 1.18, 95% CI 1.02–1.36). In the subgroup analysis by cancer type, we observed that the ATM rs664143 polymorphism was significantly associated with lung cancer risk (GA vs. GG: OR = 1.48, 95% CI 1.18–1.85, AA vs. GG: OR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.18–1.93) and rs664677 polymorphism was associated with decreased lung cancr risk and increased breast cancer risk (for lung cancer: TC vs. TT: OR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.62–0.92, CC vs. TT: OR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.64–0.99 and for breast cancer: TC vs. TT: OR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.17–1.73, CC vs. TT: OR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.21–1.87). In the subgroup analysis by region, we also observed that individuals with ATM rs664143 GA or AA genotype had an obvious increased cancer risk among Asian people (GA vs. GG: OR = 1.40, 95% CI 1.20–1.63, AA vs. GG: OR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.16–1.62). In conclusion, ATM rs664143 polymorphism was associated with cancer susceptibility. ATM rs664143 polymorphism was significantly associated with lung cancer risk. ATM rs664677 polymorphism was associated with decreased lung cancer risk as well as increased breast cancer risk.     

Are older patients less likely to be treated for pancreatic cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Pancreatic cancer is the seventh commonest cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Although prognosis is poor, both surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy improve survival. However, it has been suggested that not all pancreatic cancer patients who may benefit from treatment receive it. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the existence of age-related inequalities in receipt of first-line pancreatic cancer treatment. Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and grey literature were searched for population-based studies investigating treatment receipt, reported by age, for patients with primary pancreatic cancer from inception until 4th June 2020, and updated 5th August 2021. Studies from countries with universal healthcare were included, to minimise influence of health system-related economic factors. A modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess risk of bias. Random-effects meta-analysis was undertaken comparing likelihood of treatment receipt in older versus younger patients. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were conducted. Eighteen papers were included; 12 independent populations were eligible for meta-analysis. In most studies, < 10% of older patients were treated. Older age (generally ≥65) was significantly associated with reduced receipt of any treatment (OR=0.14, 95% CI 0.10–0.21, n = 12 studies), surgery (OR=0.15, 95% CI 0.09–0.24, n = 9 studies) and chemotherapy as a primary treatment (OR=0.13, 95% CI 0.07–0.24, n = 5 studies). The effect of age was independent of methodological quality, patient population or time-period of patient diagnosis and remained in studies with confounder adjustment. The mean quality score of included studies was 6/8. Inequalities in receipt of healthcare interventions across social groups is a recognised concern internationally. This review shows that older age is significantly, and consistently, associated with non-receipt of treatment in pancreatic cancer. However, there are risks and side-effects associated with pancreatic cancer treatment. Further research on what influences patient and professional treatment decision-making is required to better understand these apparent inequalities.     

Hyperuricemia and gout are associated with cancer incidence and mortality: A meta-analysis based on cohort studies

The association between hyperuricemia or gout and cancer risk has been investigated in various published studies, but their results are conflicting. We conducted a meta-analysis to investigate whether hyperuricemia or gout was associated with the cancer incidence and mortality. Linear and nonlinear trend analyses were conducted to explore the dose–response association between them. The pooled relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to evaluate cancer risk. A total of 24 articles (33 independent studies) were eligible for inclusion. When compared participants with the highest SUA (hyperuricemia) levels and those with the lowest SUA levels, the pooled RR was 1.08 (95% CI, 1.04–1.12), it was significantly associated among males but not among females (males, RR = 1.07; 95% CI, 1.03–1.11; females, RR = 1.06; 95% CI, 0.96–1.17). Hyperuricemia increased total cancer mortality (RR = 1.15; 95% CI, 1.05–1.26), but a significant association was observed in females rather than in males (females: RR = 1.26; 95% CI, 1.09–1.45; males, RR = 1.02; 95% CI, 0.80–1.30). Linear relationships of SUA levels with overall cancer incidence (p for nonlinearity = 0.238) and overall cancer mortality (p for nonlinearity = 0.263) were identified. However, 1 mg/dL increment in SUA levels was weakly significant in overall cancer incidence (RR = 1.01; 95% CI, 1.01–1.01) but not associated with overall cancer mortality (RR = 1.01; 95% CI, 0.99–1.03). Gout was significantly associated with increased cancer incidence (RR = 1.19; 95% CI, 1.12–1.25). In conclusion, Hyperuricemia or gout was associated with higher cancer incidence and mortality. Though a potential linear relationship between them was found, we'd better treat this result with caution.     

Analgesic use and the risk of renal cell carcinoma – Findings from the Consortium for the Investigation of Renal Malignancies (CONFIRM) study

PurposeThe incidence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is rising. Use of analgesics such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and paracetamol may affect renal function. The aim of this study was to assess associations between analgesic use and risk of RCC.MethodsA population-based case-control family design was used. Cases were recruited via two Australian state cancer registries. Controls were siblings or partners of cases. Analgesic use was captured by self-completed questionnaire. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for RCC risk associated with regular analgesic use (at least 5 times per month for 6 months or more) and duration and frequency of use.ResultsThe analysis included 1064 cases and 724 controls. Regular use of paracetamol was associated with an increased risk of RCC (OR 1.41, 95%CI 1.13–1.77). Regular use of NSAIDs was associated with increased risk of RCC for women (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.23–2.39) but not men (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.58–1.18; p-interaction=0.003). There was no evidence of a dose-response for duration of use of paracetamol (linear trend p = 0.77) and weak evidence for non- aspirin NSAID use by women (linear trend p = 0.054).ConclusionThis study found that regular use of paracetamol was associated with increased risk of RCC. NSAID use was associated with increased risk only for women.     

Effects of stem cells on non-ischemic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background aimsTo assess the impacts of stem cell therapy on clinical outcomes in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). The effect of stem cell therapy on prognosis is unclear and controversial.MethodsThe authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with NICM on a composite outcome of all-cause mortality and heart transplantation, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification, 6-minute walk test (6-MWT) distance and serum brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) level, considering studies published before March 19, 2020.ResultsTwelve trials with 623 subjects met inclusion criteria. Compared with the control group, stem cell therapy improved LVEF (weighted mean difference [WMD], 4.08%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.93–6.23, P = 0.0002) and 6-MWT distance (WMD, 101.49 m, 95% CI, 45.62–157.35, P = 0.0004) and reduced BNP level (–294.94 pg/mL, 95% CI, –383.97 to –205.90, P < 0.00001) and NYHA classification (–0.70, 95% CI, –0.98 to –0.43, P < 0.00001). However, LVEDD showed no significant difference between the two groups (WMD, –0.09 cm, 95% CI, –0.23 to 0.06, P = 0.25). In 10 studies (535 subjects) employing the intracoronary route for cell delivery, mortality and heart transplantation were decreased (risk ratio [RR], 0.73, 95% CI, 0.52–1.00, P = 0.05). Furthermore, in four studies (248 subjects) with peripheral CD34+ cells, either all-cause mortality (RR, 0.44, 95% CI, 0.23–0.86, P = 0.02) or mortality and heart transplantation (RR, 0.45, 95% CI, 0.27–0.77, P = 0.003) improved in the treatment group compared with the control. The trial sequential analysis suggested the information size of LVEF, 6-WMT and BNP has been adequate for evidencing the benefits of stem cells on NICM. However, to determine the potential survival benefit, more clinical data are required to make the statistical significance in meta-analysis more conclusive.ConclusionsThis meta-analysis demonstrates that stem cell therapy may improve survival, exercise capacity and cardiac ejection fraction in NICM, which suggests that stem cells are a promising option for NICM treatment.     

The impact of health insurance affiliation and socioeconomic status on cervical cancer survival in Bucaramanga,Colombia

Cervical cancer is still an important cause of death in countries like Colombia. We aimed to determine whether socioeconomic status of residential address (SES) and type of health insurance affiliation (HIA) might be associated with cervical cancer survival among women in Bucaramanga, Colombia. All patients residing in the Bucaramanga Metropolitan Area diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer (ICD-0–3 codes C53.X) between 2008 and 2016 (n = 725) were identified through the population-based cancer registry, with 700 women having follow-up data for >5 years (date of study closure: Dec 31, 2021), yielding an overall 5-year survival estimate (95 % CI) of 56.4 % (52.7 – 60.0 %). KM estimates of 5-year overall survival were obtained to assess differences in cervical cancer survival by SES and HIA. Multivariable Cox-proportional hazards modeling was also conducted, including interaction effects between SES and HIA. Five-year overall survival was lower when comparing low vs. high SES (41.9 % vs 57.9 %, p < 0.0001) and subsidized vs. contributive HIA (45.1 % vs 63.0 %, p < 0.0001). Multivariable Cox modeling showed increased hazard ratios (HR) of death for low vs. high SES (HR = 1.78; 95 % CI = 1.18–2.70) and subsidized vs. contributive HIA (HR = 1.44; 95 % CI = 1.13–1.83). The greatest disparity in HR was among women of low SES affiliated to subsidized HIA (vs. contributive HIA and high SES) (HR=2.53; 95 % CI = 1.62–3.97). Despite Colombia’s universal healthcare system, important disparities in cervical cancer survival by health insurance affiliation and socioeconomic status remain.     

Differences in risk factors for head and neck cancer among men and women in Nepal: A case-control study

BackgroundHead and neck cancer (HNC) is a major cause of cancer morbidity and mortality in Nepal. The study aims to investigate differences in risk factors for head and neck cancer by sex in Nepal.MethodsA hospital-based case-control study was conducted at the B.P. Koirala Memorial Cancer Hospital in Nepal from 2016 to 2018. A semi-structured questionnaire consisting of socio-demographic characteristics, dietary habits, reproductive factors, household air pollution, tobacco use (smoking and chewing), alcohol consumption, and second-hand smoking was used to collect the data. Odds ratios (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using unconditional logistic regression adjusting for potential confounders.ResultsA total of 549 HNC cases (438 men and 111 women) and 601 age-matched healthy controls (479 men and 122 women) were recruited in this study. An increased risk of HNC for low education level and family income were observed among men (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for 3rd grade and less= 1.58, 95 % CI= 1.14–2.18; AOR for family monthly income < 5000 Rupees = 1.64, 95 % CI 1.20–2.24). The AORs among women were higher than the men for known risk factors (AOR for smoking 1.34 (95 % CI 0.96–1.86) for men, 2.94 (95 % CI 1.31–6.69) for women; AOR for tobacco chewing 1.76 (95 % CI 1.27–2.46) for men, 10.22 (95 % CI 4.53–23.03) for women).ConclusionOur results point to an effect modification by sex for HNC risk factors with high AORs observed among women.     

Serum pepsinogen level,atrophic gastritis and the risk of incident pancreatic cancer—A prospective cohort study

Background: Pancreatic cancer is a highly fatal disease without screening tests. Studies have suggested possible etiologic similarities between gastric and pancreatic cancers. Atrophic gastritis, a pre-malignant condition for gastric cancer, is characterized by low serum pepsinogen I (SPGI) level. We hypothesized that low SPGI level may be associated with an increased risk of pancreatic cancer and be a useful biomarker for the disease. Methods: Our analytic cohort included 20,962 participants in the Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention Study (ATBC) who had SPGI level measured. Of these, 1663 (7.9%) subjects had low SPGI levels (<25 μg/l) and were invited for gastroscopy which was completed in 1059 (63.7%) participants. Atrophic gastritis was histologically confirmed in 1006 (95.0%) subjects. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to calculate the hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for pancreatic cancer. Results: During follow-up of up to 16.3 years (mean = 10.8 years; 226,325 person-years), 227 incident pancreatic cancers were diagnosed. The incidence rates were 9.9, 11.3, and 12.7 per 10,000 person-years of follow-up for participants with normal pepsinogen level (≥25 μg/l), low pepsinogen level and histologically confirmed atrophic gastritis, respectively. Compared to subjects with normal pepsinogen levels, there was no statistically significant increased risk of pancreatic cancer among subjects with low pepsinogen level (adjusted HR = 1.01; 95% CI: 0.63–1.62) or those with histologically confirmed atrophic gastritis (adjusted HR = 1.13; 95% CI: 0.66–1.95). Conclusions: Atrophic gastritis, serological or histological, is not associated with increased risk of pancreatic cancer. These findings do not provide any evidence for potential usefulness of SPGI for pancreatic cancer screening.     

The effect of silica exposure on the risk of lung cancer: A dose-response meta-analysis

BackgroundThe relationship between silica and the risk of developing lung cancer has been established in previous literature, but how much the level of exposure to silica can increase the risk of lung cancer is a question that has been addressed in this review.MethodsThree electronic databases, including MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for relevant literature. For the dose-response relationship between exposure to silica and developing lung cancer, we performed a meta-analysis using the random-effects model. For each level of exposure, we calculated the overall risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).ResultsNineteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. There was a positive and significant increasing dose-response trend between silica exposure and the risk of developing lung cancer as follows: < 0.50 mg/m³ 1.14 (95% CI: 1.05, 1.23; I² = 79%), 0.50–0.99 mg/m³ 1.34 (95% CI: 1.05, 171; I² = 45%), 1.00–1.99 mg/m³ 1.14 (95% CI: 1.00, 1.30; I² = 70%), 2.00–2.99 mg/m³ 1.47 (95% CI: 1.05, 2.06; I² = 57%), 3.00–3.99 mg/m³ 1.44 (95% CI: 0.99, 2.11; I² = 58%), and ≥ 4.00 mg/m³ 1.64 (95% CI: 1.20, 2.24; I² = 88%). The heterogeneity across studies was mild to moderate.ConclusionsThe presence of a dose-response relationship favors the causal relationship between exposure to silica and developing lung cancer.     

Esophageal cancer in relation to alcohol drinking and tobacco use among men in Kerala,India – Karunagappally cohort

BackgroundIn the Karunagappally cohort, esophageal cancer is the third most common cancer with an age-adjusted incidence rate of 6.2 per 100,000 person-years among men. The present study analyzed the risk of esophageal cancer in relation to alcohol drinking and tobacco use.MethodsThe study included 65,528 men aged 30–84 years in the Karunagappally cohort, India.ResultsPoisson regression analysis showed that alcohol drinking significantly increased (P = 0.027) the risk of esophageal cancer and the relative risk (RR) for current drinkers was 1.6, (95 % confidence interval (CI) = 1.1–2.3). The risk increased significantly in heavy alcohol drinkers (250 g of ethanol or above per day) (RR = 2.1, 95 % CI = 1.2–3.5) (P for trend = 0.014) and among current arrack consumers (RR = 1.8, 95 % CI = 0.99–3.29) (P for trend = 0.025). Current bidi and cigarette smokers showed an increase in the trend of cancer risk. A significantly higher risk was seen in those who had started smoking bidi before the age of 18 years, RR = 1.9 (95 % CI = 1.1–3.3) (P for trend = 0.044). Furthermore, increased RR for heavy bidi and cigarette smokers were 1.6 (95 % CI = 1.1–2.5) and 2.4 (95 % CI = 1.3–4.5), respectively.ConclusionTo the best of our knowledge, this is the first cohort study in India to report an increased esophageal cancer risk with respect to alcohol drinking.