生物磁学在鸟类定向研究中的进展

地球上广泛存在的地磁场能够为导航提供可靠的信息,因此很多鸟类在迁徙和归巢过程中都使用地磁信息来保证航行方向的正确,在迁徙的鸟类中已经发现有18种是利用地磁罗盘进行定向和导航的。本文从鸟类使用的磁罗盘、航行地图以及磁感应机制等几方面阐述了目前在鸟类生物磁学方面的研究进展。     

Avian magnetic compass: Its functional properties and physical basis

The avian magnetic compass was analyzed in bird species of three different orders - Passeriforms, Columbiforms and Galliforms - and in three different behavioral contexts, namely migratory orientation, homing and directional conditioning. The respective findings indicate similar functional properties: it is an inclination compass that works only within a functional window around the ambient magnetic field intensity, it tends to be lateralized in favor of the right eye, and it is wavelength-dependent, requiring light from the short-wavelength range of the spectrum. The underlying physical mechanisms have been identified as radical pair processes, spin-chemical reactions in specialized photopigments. The iron-based receptors in the upper beak do not seem to be involved. The existence of the same type of magnetic compass in only very distantly related bird species suggests that it may have been present already in the common ancestors of all modern birds, where it evolved as an all-purpose compass mechanism for orientation within the home range.     

Avian magnetic compass can be tuned to anomalously low magnetic intensities

The avian magnetic compass works in a fairly narrow functional window around the intensity of the local geomagnetic field, but adjusts to intensities outside this range when birds experience these new intensities for a certain time. In the past, the geomagnetic field has often been much weaker than at present. To find out whether birds can obtain directional information from a weak magnetic field, we studied spontaneous orientation preferences of migratory robins in a 4 µT field (i.e. a field of less than 10 per cent of the local intensity of 47 µT). Birds can adjust to this low intensity: they turned out to be disoriented under 4 µT after a pre-exposure time of 8 h to 4 µT, but were able to orient in this field after a total exposure time of 17 h. This demonstrates a considerable plasticity of the avian magnetic compass. Orientation in the 4 µT field was not affected by local anaesthesia of the upper beak, but was disrupted by a radiofrequency magnetic field of 1.315 MHz, 480 nT, suggesting that a radical-pair mechanism still provides the directional information in the low magnetic field. This is in agreement with the idea that the avian magnetic compass may have developed already in the Mesozoic in the common ancestor of modern birds.     

Development of lateralization of the magnetic compass in a migratory bird

The magnetic compass of a migratory bird, the European robin (Erithacus rubecula), was shown to be lateralized in favour of the right eye/left brain hemisphere. However, this seems to be a property of the avian magnetic compass that is not present from the beginning, but develops only as the birds grow older. During first migration in autumn, juvenile robins can orient by their magnetic compass with their right as well as with their left eye. In the following spring, however, the magnetic compass is already lateralized, but this lateralization is still flexible: it could be removed by covering the right eye for 6 h. During the following autumn migration, the lateralization becomes more strongly fixed, with a 6 h occlusion of the right eye no longer having an effect. This change from a bilateral to a lateralized magnetic compass appears to be a maturation process, the first such case known so far in birds. Because both eyes mediate identical information about the geomagnetic field, brain asymmetry for the magnetic compass could increase efficiency by setting the other hemisphere free for other processes.     

Orientation of birds in total darkness

Magnetic compass orientation of migratory birds is known to be light dependent, and radical-pair processes have been identified as the underlying mechanism. Here we report for the first time results of tests with European robins, Erithacus rubecula, in total darkness and, as a control, under 565 nm green light. Under green light, the robins oriented in their normal migratory direction, with southerly headings in autumn and northerly headings in spring. By contrast, in darkness they significantly preferred westerly directions in spring as well as autumn. This failure to show the normal seasonal change characterizes the orientation in total darkness as a "fixed direction" response. Tests in magnetic fields with the vertical or the horizontal component inverted showed that the preferred direction depended on the magnetic field but did not involve the avian inclination compass. A high-frequency field of 1.315 MHz did not affect the behavior, whereas local anesthesia of the upper beak resulted in disorientation. The behavior in darkness is thus fundamentally different from normal compass orientation and relies on another source of magnetic information: It does not involve the radical-pair mechanism but rather originates in the iron-containing receptors in the upper beak.     

Two different types of light-dependent responses to magnetic fields in birds

A model of magnetoreception proposes that the avian magnetic compass is based on a radical pair mechanism, with photon absorption leading to the formation of radical pairs. Analyzing the predicted light dependency by testing migratory birds under monochromatic lights, we found that the responses of birds change with increasing intensity. The analysis of the orientation of European robins under 502 nm turquoise light revealed two types of responses depending on light intensity: under a quantal flux of 8.10(15) quanta m(-2) s(-1), the birds showed normal migratory orientation in spring as well as in autumn, relying on their inclination compass. Under brighter light of 54.10(15) quanta m(-2) s(-1), however, they showed a "fixed" tendency toward north that did not undergo the seasonal change and proved to be based on magnetic polarity, not involving the inclination compass. When birds were exposed to a weak oscillating field, which specifically interferes with radical pair processes, the inclination compass response was disrupted, whereas the response to magnetic polarity remained unaffected. These findings indicate that the normal inclination compass used for migratory orientation is based on a radical-pair mechanism, whereas the fixed direction represents a novel type of light-dependent orientation based on a mechanism of a different nature.     

Avian navigation: from historical to modern concepts

Studies on avian navigation began at the end of the 19th century with testing various hypotheses, followed by large-scale displacement experiments to assess the capacity of the birds' navigational abilities. In the 1950s, the first theoretical concepts were published. Kramer proposed his ‘Map-and-Compass’ model, assuming that birds establish the direction to a distant goal with the help of an external reference, a compass. The model describes homing as a two-step process, with the first step determining the direction to the goal as a compass course and the second step locating this course with the help of a compass. This model was widely accepted when numerous experiments with clock-shifted pigeons demonstrated the use of the sun compass, and thus a general involvement of compass orientation, in homing. The ‘map’ step is assumed to use local site-specific information, which led to the idea of a ‘grid map’ based on environmental gradients. Kramer's model still forms the basis of our present concept on avian homing, yet route integration with the help of an external reference provides an alternative strategy to determine the home course, and the magnetic compass is a second compass mechanism available to birds. These mechanisms are interrelated by ontogenetic learning processes. A two-step process, with the first step providing the compass course and the second step locating this course with the help of a compass, appears to be a common feature of avian navigation tasks, yet the origin of the compass courses differs between tasks according to their nature, with courses acquired by experience for flights within the home range, courses based on navigational processes for returning home, and courses derived from genetically coded information in first-time migrants. Compass orientation thus forms the backbone of the avian navigational system. Copyright 2003 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.      

On the use of magnets to disrupt the physiological compass of birds

Behavioral researchers have attached magnets to birds during orientation experiments, assuming that such magnets will disrupt their ability to obtain magnetic information. Here, we investigate the effect of an attached magnet on the ability to derive directional information from a radical-pair based compass mechanism. We outline in some detail the geometrical symmetries that would allow a bird to identify magnetic directions in a radical-pair based compass. We show that the artificial field through an attached magnet will quickly disrupt the birds' ability to distinguish pole-ward from equator-ward headings, but that much stronger fields are necessary to disrupt their ability to detect the magnetic axis. Together with estimates of the functional limits of a radical-pair based compass, our calculations suggest that artificial fields of comparable size to the geomagnetic field are not generally sufficient to render a radical-pair based compass non-functional.     

Mechanisms of magnetic orientation in birds

Behavior and electrophysiological studies have demonstrateda sensitivity to characteristics of the Geomagnetic field thatcan be used for navigation, both for direction finding (compass)and position finding (map). The avian magnetic compass receptorappears to be a light-dependent, wavelength-sensitive systemthat functions as a polarity compass (i.e., it distinguishespoleward from equatorward rather than north from south) andis relatively insensitive to changes in magnetic field intensity.The receptor is within the retina and is based on one or morephotopigments, perhaps cryptochromes. A second receptor systemappears to be based on magnetite and might serve to transducelocation information independent of the compass system. Thisreceptor is associated with the ophthalmic branch of the trigeminalnerve and is sensitive to very small (<50 nanotesla) changesin the intensity of the magnetic field. In neither case hasa neuron that responded to changes in the magnetic field beentraced to a structure that can be identified to be a receptor.Almost nothing is known about how magnetic information is processedwithin the brain or how it is combined with other sensory informationand used for navigation. These remain areas of future research.     

Bats use magnetite to detect the earth's magnetic field

While the role of magnetic cues for compass orientation has been confirmed in numerous animals, the mechanism of detection is still debated. Two hypotheses have been proposed, one based on a light dependent mechanism, apparently used by birds and another based on a "compass organelle" containing the iron oxide particles magnetite (Fe(3)O(4)). Bats have recently been shown to use magnetic cues for compass orientation but the method by which they detect the Earth's magnetic field remains unknown. Here we use the classic "Kalmijn-Blakemore" pulse re-magnetization experiment, whereby the polarity of cellular magnetite is reversed. The results demonstrate that the big brown bat Eptesicus fuscus uses single domain magnetite to detect the Earths magnetic field and the response indicates a polarity based receptor. Polarity detection is a prerequisite for the use of magnetite as a compass and suggests that big brown bats use magnetite to detect the magnetic field as a compass. Our results indicate the possibility that sensory cells in bats contain freely rotating magnetite particles, which appears not to be the case in birds. It is crucial that the ultrastructure of the magnetite containing magnetoreceptors is described for our understanding of magnetoreception in animals.     

Geomagnetic Reversals and Genome Imprinting

If it is more fundamental to formulate biological expression in terms of electromagnetic fields, does this also imply that living things are especially sensitive to the external electromagnetic environment? Specifically, we examine possible genomic effects due to reversals of the geomagnetic field. To maintain sensitivity following a reversal, the Wiltschko hypothesis for the avian magnetic compass can be subsumed under an NB imprinting paradigm, where N is the horizontal vector pointing to magnetic north and B the geomagnetic field vector. Even with a compass that is invariant under reversals, there are nevertheless potential difficulties due to discontinuities in the magnitude of the field during the transition between one chron and the next. Indeed, transitions may be one reason for other-than-magnetic avian auxiliary compasses. Additional problems may also arise during transitions because of high rates of change in B. However, the largest reported dB/dt (Steens Mountain event) is estimated at 1 /u.T/day, seemingly too small to induce significant Faraday current density. Reversals may have also helped determine the nature of the interaction mechanism between GMF and living systems. Mechanisms based on fixed magnetic moments may not be capable of adapting to the reversal process. A better case can be made for an ion cyclotron resonance interaction. Direct involvement in the cell-signaling activities of biological ions would provide such flexibility, and also point to a broader role for the GMF in modulating CNS function than merely to provide orientation.     

You Can Get There from Here: Responses to Simulated Magnetic Equator Crossing by the Bobolink (Dolichonyx oryzivorus)

The avian magnetic compass works as an inclination compass. Instead of using the polarity of the magnetic field to determine direction, birds use the inclination of the dip angle. Consequently, transequatorial migrants have to reverse their response to the magnetic compass after crossing the magnetic equator. When confronted with an artificial magnetic field that reverses the vertical component of the magnetic field, migrants such as the bobolink reverse their headings relative to magnetic north even in the presence of visual cues such as stellar patterns. Bobolinks, which breed in temperate North America and winter in temperate South America, were tested in a planetarium under fixed star patterns in a series of magnetic fields incremented each night from the natural field in the northern hemisphere through an artificial horizontal field to an artificial southern hemisphere magnetic field. The birds maintained a constant heading throughout the experiment and did not reverse direction after the simulated crossing of the magnetic equator as previous experiments predicted. In nature, this response would have meant continuation of their migration flight across the equator and into the opposite hemisphere. The switch from “equatorward” orientation to “poleward” orientation is probably triggered by experience with a horizontal magnetic field and/or visual cues. The ability to maintain an accurate heading while crossing the magnetic equator may be based on the use of visual cues such as the stars.     

Das Orientierungssystem der V?gel I. Kompa?mechanismen

Zusammenfassung V?gel stellen den Bezug zum Ziel indirekt über ein externes Referenzsystem her. Der Navigationsproze? besteht deshalb aus zwei Schritten: zun?chst wird die Richtung zum Ziel als Kompa?kurs festgelegt, dann wird dieser Kurs mit Hilfe eines Kompa?mechanismus aufgesucht. Das Magnetfeld der Erde und Himmelsfaktoren werden von den V?gel als Kompa? benutzt. In der vorliegenden Arbeit werden der Magnetkompa?, der Sonnenkompa? und der Sternkompa? der V?gel in ihrer Funktionsweise, ihrer Entstehung und ihrer biologischen Bedeutung vorgestellt. Der Magnetkompa? erwies sich als Inklinationskompa?, der nicht auf der Polarit?t, sondern auf der Neigung der Feldlinien im Raum beruht; er unterscheidet „polw?rts“ und „?quatorw?rts“ statt Nord und Süd. Er ist ein angeborener Mechanismus und wird beim Vogelzug und beim Heimfinden benutzt. Seine eigentliche Bedeutung liegt jedoch darin, da? er ein Referenzsystem bereitstellt, mit dessen Hilfe andere Orientierungsfaktoren zueinander in Beziehung gesetzt werden k?nnen. Der Sonnenkompa? beruht auf Erfahrung; Sonnenazimut, Tageszeit und Richtung werden durch Lernprozesse miteinander verknüpft, wobei der Magnetkompa? als Richtungsreferenzsystem dient. Sobald er verfügbar ist, wird der Sonnenkompa? bei der Orientierung im Heimbereich und beim Heimfinden bevorzugt benutzt; beim Vogelzug spielt er, wahrscheinlich wegen seiner Abh?ngigkeit von der geographischen Breite, kaum eine Rolle. Der Sternkompa? arbeitet ohne Beteiligung der Inneren Uhr; die V?gel leiten Richtungen aus den Konfigurationen der Sterne zueinander ab. Lernprozesse erstellen den Sternkompa? in der Phase vor dem ersten Zug; dabei fungiert die Himmelsrotation als Referenzsystem. Sp?ter, w?hrend des Zuges, übernimmt der Magnetkompa? diese Rolle. Die relative Bedeutung der verschiedenen Kompa?systeme wurde in Versuchen untersucht, bei denen Magnetfeld und Himmelsfaktoren einander widersprechende Richtungs-information gaben. Die erste Reaktion der V?gel war von Art zu Art verschieden; langfristig scheinen sich die V?gel jedoch nach dem Magnetkompa? zu richten. Dabei werden die Himmelsfaktoren umgeeicht, so da? magnetische Information und Himmelsinformation wieder im Einklang stehen. Der Magnetkompa? und die Himmelsfaktoren erg?nzen einander: der Magnetkompa? ersetzt Sonnen- und Sternkompa? bei bedecktem Himmel; die Himmelsfaktoren erleichtern den V?geln das Richtungseinhalten, zu dem der Magnetkompa? offenbar wenig geeignet ist. Magnetfeld und Himmelsfaktoren sollten deshalb als integrierte Komponenten eines multifaktoriellen Systems zur Richtungsorientierung betrachtet werden.

---

The orientation system of birds — I. Compass mechanisms

Summary Because of the large distances involved, birds establish contact with their goal indirectly via an external reference. Hence any navigation is a two-step process: in the first step, the direction to the goal is determined as a compass course; in the second step, this course is located with a compass. The geomagnetic field and celestial cues provide birds with compass information. The magnetic compass of birds, the sun compass the star compass and the interactions between the compass mechanisms are described in the present paper. Magnetic compass orientation was first demonstrated by testing night-migrating birds in experimentally altered magnetic fields: the birds changed their directional tendencies according to the deflected North direction. The avian magnetic compass proved to be an inclination compass: it does not use polarity; instead it is based on the axial course of the field lines and their inclination in space, distinguishing “poleward” and “equatorward” rather than North and South. Its functional range is limited to intensities around the local field strength, but this biological window is flexible and can be adjusted to other intensities. The magnetic compass is an innate mechanism that is widely used in bird migration and in homing. Its most important role, however, is that of a basic reference system for calibrating other kinds of orientation cues. Sun compass orientation is demonstrated by clock-shift experiments: Shifting the birds' internal clock causes them to misjudge the position of the sun, thus leading to typical deflections which indicate sun compass use. The analysis of the avian sun compass revealed that it is based only on sun azimuth and the internal clock; the sun's altitude is not involved. The role of the pattern of polarized light associated with the sun is unclear; only at sunset has it been shown to be an important cue for nocturnal migrants, being part of the sun compass. The sun compass is based on experience; sun azimuth, time of day and direction are combined by learning processes during a sensitive period, with the magnetic compass serving as directional reference. When established, the sun compass becomes the preferred compass mechanism for orientation tasks within the home region and homing: in migration, however, its role is minimal, probably because of the changes of the sun's arc with geographic latitude. The star compass was demonstrated in night-migrating birds by projecting the northern stars in different directions in a planetarium. The analysis of the mechanism revealed that the internal clock is not involved; birds derive directions from the spatial relationship of the star configurations. The star compass is also established by experience; the directional reference is first provided by celestial rotation, later, during migration, by the magnetic compass. The relative importance of the various compass mechanisms has been tested in experiments in which celestial and magnetic cues gave conflicting information. The first response of birds to conflicting cues differs considerably between species; after repeated exposures, however, the birds oriented according to magnetic North, indicating a long-term dominance of the magnetic compass. Later tests in the absence of magnetic information showed that celestial cues were not simply ignored, but recalibrated so that they were again in agreement with magnetic cues. The magnetic compass and celestial cues complement each other: the magnetic field ensures orientation under overcast sky; celestial cues facilitate maintaining directions, for which the magnetic compass appears to be ill suited. In view of this, the magnetic field and celestial cues should be regarded as integrated components of a multifactorial system for directional orientation.

     

鸟类磁感受的生物物理机制研究进展

行为学实验表明,许多鸟类能够感受到地磁信息,并利用地磁信息完成迁徙或归巢。地磁场信息能提供可靠导航信息,磁力线可提供罗盘信息,而磁场强度和倾角可提供位置信息。文章介绍了鸟类磁感受机制的两种重要假说——基于磁铁矿的磁感受假说和化学磁感受假说,阐明了两种假说的理论原理及实验证据,对地磁信息传导神经通路与处理脑区做了评述,并展望了其发展方向。     

Use of a light-dependent magnetic compass for y-axis orientation in European common frog (Rana temporaria) tadpoles

We provide evidence for the use of a magnetic compass for y-axis orientation (i.e., orientation along the shore-deep water axis) by tadpoles of the European common frog (Rana temporaria). Furthermore, our study provides evidence for a wavelength-dependent effect of light on magnetic compass orientation in amphibians. Tadpoles trained and then tested under full-spectrum light displayed magnetic compass orientation that coincided with the trained shore-deep water axes of their training tanks. Conversely, tadpoles trained under long-wavelength (≥500 nm) light and tested under full-spectrum light, and tadpoles trained under full-spectrum light and tested under long-wavelength (≥500 nm) light, exhibited a 90° shift in magnetic compass orientation relative to the trained y-axis direction. Our results are consistent with earlier studies showing that the observed 90° shift in the direction of magnetic compass orientation under long-wavelength (≥500 nm) light is due to a direct effect of light on the underlying magnetoreception mechanism. These findings also show that wavelength-dependent effects of light do not compromise the function of the magnetic compass under a wide range of natural lighting conditions, presumably due to a large asymmetry in the relatively sensitivity of antagonistic short- and long-wavelength inputs to the light-dependent magnetic compass.     

Role of exchange and dipolar interactions in the radical pair model of the avian magnetic compass

It is not yet understood how migratory birds sense the Earth's magnetic field as a source of compass information. One suggestion is that the magnetoreceptor involves a photochemical reaction whose product yields are sensitive to external magnetic fields. Specifically, a flavin-tryptophan radical pair is supposedly formed by photoinduced sequential electron transfer along a chain of three tryptophan residues in a cryptochrome flavoprotein immobilized in the retina. The electron Zeeman interaction with the Earth's magnetic field (∼50 μT), modulated by anisotropic magnetic interactions within the radicals, causes the product yields to depend on the orientation of the receptor. According to well-established theory, the radicals would need to be separated by >3.5 nm in order that interradical spin-spin interactions are weak enough to permit a ∼50 μT field to have a significant effect. Using quantum mechanical simulations, it is shown here that substantial changes in product yields can nevertheless be expected at the much smaller separation of 2.0 ± 0.2 nm where the effects of exchange and dipolar interactions partially cancel. The terminal flavin-tryptophan radical pair in cryptochrome has a separation of ∼1.9 nm and is thus ideally placed to act as a magnetoreceptor for the compass mechanism.     

Orientation and navigation of migrating birds

The question of how migrating birds find their way to winter quarters and back has fascinated humans since the beginning of scientific research into avian biology. Migrating birds have been shown to possess compass systems that allow them to select and maintain certain compass directions. Three such systems are known, solar, stellar and magnetic. Their details are not quite clear and need further research. Hierarchy and interaction of compass systems of migrating birds are poorly studied; different species may vary in this respect. During migration, birds learn to use maps that make true navigation possible, i.e. to detect their position relatively to the goal of movement. The physical nature of navigational maps is an object of intensive research; currently the most promising concepts are the geomagnetic and possibly olfactory maps. A significant contribution to the study of formation of navigational maps was made by Soviet/Russian researchers, whose work was published in Zoologicheskii Zhurnal (Sokolov et al., 1984). Migrating birds have no innate map, and first-autumn individuals reach their species-specific wintering areas by using compass sense and counting time that should be spent moving in certain genetically fixed directions. However, in recent years more and more data surface that suggest that juveniles (maybe not of all species) do have some mechanism of controlling their position on the migratory route that allows them to compensate for errors of the spatio-temporal programme of migration.     

Magnetic Compass of Birds Is Based on a Molecule with Optimal Directional Sensitivity

The avian magnetic compass has been well characterized in behavioral tests: it is an “inclination compass” based on the inclination of the field lines rather than on the polarity, and its operation requires short-wavelength light. The “radical pair” model suggests that these properties reflect the use of specialized photopigments in the primary process of magnetoreception; it has recently been supported by experimental evidence indicating a role of magnetically sensitive radical-pair processes in the avian magnetic compass. In a multidisciplinary approach subjecting migratory birds to oscillating fields and using their orientation responses as a criterion for unhindered magnetoreception, we identify key features of the underlying receptor molecules. Our observation of resonance effects at specific frequencies, combined with new theoretical considerations and calculations, indicate that birds use a radical pair with special properties that is optimally designed as a receptor in a biological compass. This radical pair design might be realized by cryptochrome photoreceptors if paired with molecular oxygen as a reaction partner.     

Changes in the short-term deflector loft effect are linked to the sun compass of homing pigeons

Despite being the most studied of all avian orientation systems, important questions still remain about the sun compass of homing pigeons, Columba livia. White it is well-documented that the sun compass is usually learned by young pigeons during the first 10–12 weeks of life, the mechanism by which it is calibrated to adjust for seasonal changes in the sun's azimuth is not known with certainty. Previous experiments using short-term deflector loft pigeons indicated that the sun compass may be calibrated by referencing celestial polarization patterns. The present paper describes important measurable changes in the previously reported orientation behaviour of short-term deflector loft birds, and suggests a correlation between these changes and the presence of a massive upper-atmospheric dust cloud of volcanic origin which significantly altered natural skylight polarization patterns in 1982 and 1983. Moreover, it is shown that when the short-term effect was absent (at times when data from previous years suggested it should be present), the birds were also not using sun compass orientation, as demonstrated by their failure to show the standard ‘clockshift’ response to a 6-h fast shift of their internal clocks. These results support the hypothesis that reflected light cues, rather than odours, are the basis of the deflector loft effect in pigeon homing.     

On atomic nuclear fusion processes at low temperatures. Enhancement of potential barrier transmission probability due to the so-called barrier anti-Zeno effect

It is known that in quantum mechanics the observation of an experiment may in some cases change the results of this experiment. In particular, this occurs for the so-called Zeno effect. It is shown that, unlike the standard Zeno effect for which observation reduces its probability, for a particle that penetrates a potential barrier the opposite situation (called the barrier anti-Zeno effect) can occur, i.e., observation can considerably increase the probability of barrier penetration. The possibility of utilizing the barrier anti-Zeno effect for explaining the paradoxical results of experiments on “cold nuclear fusion” that have been observed in various, including biological, systems is discussed. (According to the experimentalists who performed such studies, in these systems energy release that cannot be explained by any chemical processes, as well as changes of the isotope and even elemental composition of the studied substance, occur).