<Emphasis Type="Italic">Drosophila</Emphasis> Dunc-115 mediates axon projection through actin binding

A central step in organizing the central nervous system development is the growth cone of an axon navigating through guidance cues to reach its specific target. While a great deal of this process has been understood especially in identifying the extracellular guidance cues and their membrane receptors, much less is known about how guidance signals are further relayed to the actin filaments that are central to the mobility of the growth cone. The previous results from our laboratory have shown that Drosophila gene dunc-115 regulates axon projection in the eye and the central nervous system. Furthermore, Dunc-115 has a villin-headpiece (VHD) domain, implying the possibility of binding to actin. To further characterize Dunc-115’s functions, we have identified the isoform Dunc-115L as a possible downstream target in relaying guidance cues further down to the cytoskeleton. Specifically, we have shown that Dunc-115 regulates neural connections in both the eye and the central nervous system in Drosophila and that Dunc-115 contains an actin-binding domain potentially capable of binding to actin filaments. In this report, we show that Dunc-115 binds to actin via its VHD domain directly, suggesting a possible mechanism for how Dunc-115 relays guidance signals.     

认识Munc13*

Munc13是C.elegans Unc-13和Drosophila Dunc-13在哺乳动物中的同系物,有四种亚型,是SNARE蛋白的调节蛋白之一。Munc13蛋白含有两个结构域:C1和C2结构域,DAG/佛波醇结合到C1结构域上,能增强Munc13-1促进囊泡成熟的能力。在神经递质的胞吐过程中,有许许多多的蛋白参与,其中Munc,Synaptotagmin和Rab等蛋白家族是其重要的调节因子。同时,囊泡的转运和分泌也需要这些功能特殊的蛋白质的参与。全面了解Munc13的结构域与功能及其在分泌中的地位和分泌模式,有助于其在临床医学中的应用,如其在胰岛素释放等分泌调节中起着的重要作用。     

Plakins in development and disease

Plakins are large multi-domain molecules that have various functions to link cytoskeletal elements together and to connect them to junctional complexes. Plakins were first identified in epithelial cells where they were found to connect the intermediate filaments to desmosomes and hemidesmosomes [Ruhrberg, C., and Watt, F.M. (1997). The plakin family: versatile organizers of cytoskeletal architecture. Curr Opin Genet Dev 7, 392-397.]. They were subsequently found to be important for the integrity of muscle cells. Most recently, they have been found in the nervous system, where their functions appear to be more complex, including cross-linking of microtubules (MTs) and actin filaments [Leung, C.L., Zheng, M., Prater, S.M., and Liem, R.K. (2001). The BPAG1 locus: Alternative splicing produces multiple isoforms with distinct cytoskeletal linker domains, including predominant isoforms in neurons and muscles. J Cell Biol 154, 691-697., Leung, C.L., Sun, D., Zheng, M., Knowles, D.R., and Liem, R.K. (1999). Microtubule actin cross-linking factor (MACF): a hybrid of dystonin and dystrophin that can interact with the actin and microtubule cytoskeletons. J Cell Biol 147, 1275-1286.]. These plakins have also indicated their relationship to the spectrin superfamily of proteins and the plakins appear to be evolutionarily related to the spectrins, but have diverged to perform different specialized functions. In invertebrates, a single plakin is present in both Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans, which resemble the more complex plakins found in mammals [Roper, K., Gregory, S.L., and Brown, N.H. (2002). The 'spectraplakins': cytoskeletal giants with characteristics of both spectrin and plakin families. J Cell Sci 115, 4215-4225.]. In contrast, there are seven plakins found in mammals and most of them have alternatively spliced forms leading to a very complex group of proteins with potential tissue specific functions [Jefferson, J.J., Leung, C.L., and Liem, R.K. (2004). Plakins: goliaths that link cell junctions and the cytoskeleton. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5, 542-553.]. In this review, we will first describe the plakins, desmoplakin, plectin, envoplakin and periplakin and then describe two other mammalian plakins, Bullous pemphigoid antigen 1 (BPAG1) and microtubule actin cross-linking factor 1 (MACF1), that are expressed in multiple isoforms in different tissues. We will also describe the relationship of these two proteins to the invertebrate plakins, shortstop (shot) in Drosophila and VAB-10 in C. elegans. Finally, we will describe an unusual mammalian plakin, called epiplakin.     

认识Munc13

Munc13是C.elegans Unc-13和Drosophila Dunc-13在哺乳动物中的同系物,有四种亚型,是SNARE蛋白的调节蛋白之一。Munc13蛋白含有两个结构域：C1和C2结构域,DAG/佛波醇结合到C1结构域上,能增强Munc13-1促进囊泡成熟的能力。在神经递质的胞吐过程中,有许许多多的蛋白参与,其中Munc,Synaptotagmin和Rab等蛋白家族是其重要的调节因子。同时,囊泡的转运和分泌也需要这些功能特殊的蛋白质的参与。全面了解Munc13的结构域与功能及其在分泌中的地位和分泌模式,有助于其在临床医学中的应用,如其在胰岛素释放等分泌调节中起着的重要作用。     

The amino-terminal domain of the B subunit of vacuolar H+-ATPase contains a filamentous actin binding site

Vacuolar H(+)-ATPase (V-ATPase) binds actin filaments with high affinity (K(d) = 55 nm; Lee, B. S., Gluck, S. L., and Holliday, L. S. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 29164-29171). We have proposed that this interaction is an important mechanism controlling transport of V-ATPase from the cytoplasm to the plasma membrane of osteoclasts. Here we show that both the B1 (kidney) and B2 (brain) isoforms of the B subunit of V-ATPase contain a microfilament binding site in their amino-terminal domain. In pelleting assays containing actin filaments and partially disrupted V-ATPase, B subunits were found in greater abundance in actin pellets than were other V-ATPase subunits, suggesting that the B subunit contained an F-actin binding site. In overlay assays, biotinylated actin filaments also bound to the B subunit. A fusion protein containing the amino-terminal half of B1 subunit bound actin filaments tightly, but fusion proteins containing the carboxyl-terminal half of B1 subunit, or the full-length E subunit, did not bind F-actin. Fusion proteins containing the amino-terminal 106 amino acids of the B1 isoform or the amino-terminal 112 amino acids of the B2 isoform bound filamentous actin with K(d) values of 130 and 190 nm, respectively, and approached saturation at 1 mol of fusion protein/mol of filamentous actin. The B1 and B2 amino-terminal fusion proteins competed with V-ATPase for binding to filamentous actin. In summary, binding sites for F-actin are present in the amino-terminal domains of both isoforms of the B subunit, and likely are responsible for the interaction between V-ATPase and actin filaments in vivo.     

Knockdown and overexpression of Unc-45b result in defective myofibril organization in skeletal muscles of zebrafish embryos

Background  

Unc-45 is a myosin chaperone and a Hsp90 co-chaperone that plays a key role in muscle development. Genetic and biochemical studies in C. elegans have demonstrated that Unc-45 facilitates the process of myosin folding and assembly in body wall muscles. Loss or overexpression of Unc-45 in C. elegans results in defective myofibril organization. In the zebrafish Danio rerio, unc-45b, a homolog of C. elegans unc-45, is expressed in both skeletal and cardiac muscles. Earlier studies indicate that mutation or knockdown of unc-45b expression in zebrafish results in a phenotype characterized by a loss of both thick and thin filament organization in skeletal and cardiac muscle. The effects of unc-45b knockdown on other sarcomeric structures and the phenotype of Unc-45b overexpression, however, are poorly understood in vertebrates.     

The Caenorhabditis elegans unc-78 gene encodes a homologue of actin-interacting protein 1 required for organized assembly of muscle actin filaments

Assembly and maintenance of myofibrils require dynamic regulation of the actin cytoskeleton. In Caenorhabditis elegans, UNC-60B, a muscle-specific actin depolymerizing factor (ADF)/cofilin isoform, is required for proper actin filament assembly in body wall muscle (Ono, S., D.L. Baillie, and G.M. Benian. 1999. J. Cell Biol. 145:491--502). Here, I show that UNC-78 is a homologue of actin-interacting protein 1 (AIP1) and functions as a novel regulator of actin organization in myofibrils. In unc-78 mutants, the striated organization of actin filaments is disrupted, and large actin aggregates are formed in the body wall muscle cells, resulting in defects in their motility. Point mutations in unc-78 alleles change conserved residues within different WD repeats of the UNC-78 protein and cause less severe phenotypes than a deletion allele, suggesting that these mutations partially impair the function of UNC-78. UNC-60B is normally localized in the diffuse cytoplasm and to the myofibrils in wild type but mislocalized to the actin aggregates in unc-78 mutants. Similar Unc-78 phenotypes are observed in both embryonic and adult muscles. Thus, AIP1 is an important regulator of actin filament organization and localization of ADF/cofilin during development of myofibrils.     

α-Bungarotoxin binding in the central nervous system of Limulus polyphemus

The binding of ¹²⁵I-labeled α-bungarotoxin in the central nervous system of the horseshoe crab, Limulus polyphemus, was investigated. Comparative binding studies in various tissues of L. polyphemus demonstrated a selective association of the toxin with nervous tissues. The greatest enrichment of toxin binding in subcellular fractions of brain tissue was observed in a fraction enriched in mitochondria and acetylcholinesterase-containing membranes. Autoradiographic studies revealed the localization of α-bungarotoxin binding to the longitudinal connectives and neuropile regions of the abdominal ganglia. Three toxin binding components with approximate sedimentation coefficients of 9 S, 15.4 S and 17.4 S were present in solubilized extracts of brain tissue. ¹²⁵I-labeled α-bungarotoxin binding to these components was inhibited 72%, 47%, 9% and 0% by 10 μM concentrations of (+)-tubocurarine, nicotine, scopolamine and pilocarpine, respectively. The apparent formation of the 15.4 S and 17.4 S proteins from the 9 S protein was obtained. The 15.4 S and 17.4 S components are suggested as aggregates of the 9 S protein. This 9 S protein is proposed as an acetylcholine receptor from the central nervous system of L. polyphemus.     

UNC-60B, an ADF/cofilin family protein, is required for proper assembly of actin into myofibrils in Caenorhabditis elegans body wall muscle

The Caenorhabditis elegans unc-60 gene encodes two functionally distinct isoforms of ADF/cofilin that are implicated in myofibril assembly. Here, we show that one of the gene products, UNC-60B, is specifically required for proper assembly of actin into myofibrils. We found that all homozygous viable unc-60 mutations resided in the unc-60B coding region, indicating that UNC-60B is responsible for the Unc-60 phenotype. Wild-type UNC-60B had F-actin binding, partial actin depolymerizing, and weak F-actin severing activities in vitro. However, mutations in UNC-60B caused various alterations in these activities. Three missense mutations resulted in weaker F-actin binding and actin depolymerizing activities and complete loss of severing activity. The r398 mutation truncated three residues from the COOH terminus and resulted in the loss of severing activity and greater actin depolymerizing activity. The s1307 mutation in a putative actin-binding helix caused greater activity in actin-depolymerizing and severing. Using a specific antibody for UNC-60B, we found varying protein levels of UNC-60B in mutant animals, and that UNC-60B was expressed in embryonic muscles. Regardless of these various molecular phenotypes, actin was not properly assembled into embryonic myofibrils in all unc-60 mutants to similar extents. We conclude that precise control of actin filament dynamics by UNC-60B is required for proper integration of actin into myofibrils.     

Kinetic studies on the association and dissociation of myosin subfragment 1 and actin.

The reactions of pyrene-labeled actin with myosin subfragment 1 (S1) and S1-ligand complexes at low ionic strength are described by the schemes [formula: see text] where M refers to a myosin head; A is actin; L is ligand; the asterisk refers to a high fluorescence state of actin; and K1 and K3 are association constants. K1 is reduced approximately 10-fold for M.ADP or M.pyrophosphate versus M alone. The rate constant of the isomerization step (k2) is 150-200 s-1 for A*M, A*M.ADP, and A*M-pyrophosphate (20 degrees C). The interaction between the ligand the actin binding sites reduces K2 from 2,000 for A*M to 50-100 for A*M.ADP and to approximately unity for A*M-pyrophosphate. The A*M.ADP state is equated with the AM'.ADP state of Sleep and Hutton (Sleep, J., A., and Hutton, R. L. (1980) Biochemistry 19, 1276-1283).     

Molecular characterization of profilin isoforms from tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) pollen

Profilins are actin-binding proteins in eukaryotes which participate in the phosphoinositide pathway via binding to PIP₂. Using polyclonal rabbit sera raised against plant profilins, the occurrence of several profilin isoforms is demonstrated in two-dimensionally analyzed tobacco pollen extracts. The cDNAs coding for two novel tobacco profilin isoforms (ntPro2, ntPro3) were isolated from a pollen cDNA library by antibody screening. When the cDNA and deduced amino acid sequences of the two isoforms were compared with a previously isolated tobacco pollen profilin cl)NA (ntPro1), significant differences were noted in the non-coding regions, whereas the coding sequences, in particular the functional domains, showed little variation. The cDNAs coding for the three tobacco profilin isoforms were expressed inEscherichia coli and shown to bind comparably to different anti-profilin antisera. The high degree of similarity among the different tobacco pollen profilin isoforms points to functional equivalence. Assuming that the presence of profilin is indispensable to the control of the large amounts of actin present in pollen, the occurrence of different profilin isoforms in pollen is interpreted to represent a protective mechanism against loss of profilin functions.     

Protein 4.1 in forebrain postsynaptic density preparations: enrichment of 4.1 gene products and detection of 4.1R binding proteins.

4.1 Proteins are a family of multifunctional cytoskeletal components (4.1R, 4.1G, 4.1N and 4.1B) derived from four related genes, each of which is expressed in the nervous system. Using subcellular fractionation, we have investigated the possibility that 4.1 proteins are components of forebrain postsynaptic densities, cellular compartments enriched in spectrin and actin, whose interaction is regulated by 4.1R. Antibodies to each of 4.1R, 4.1G, 4.1N and 4.1B recognize polypeptides in postsynaptic density preparations. Of these, an 80-kDa 4.1R polypeptide is enriched 11-fold in postsynaptic density preparations relative to brain homogenate. Polypeptides of 150 and 125 kDa represent 4.1B; of these, only the 125 kDa species is enriched (threefold). Antibodies to 4.1N recognize polypeptides of approximately 115, 100, 90 and 65 kDa, each enriched in postsynaptic density preparations relative to brain homogenate. Minor 225 and 200 kDa polypeptides are recognized selectively by specific anti-4.1G antibodies; the 200 kDa species is enriched 2.5-fold. These data indicate that specific isoforms of all four 4.1 proteins are components of postsynaptic densities. Blot overlay analyses indicate that, in addition to spectrin and actin, postsynaptic density polypeptides of 140, 115, 72 and 66 kDa are likely to be 4.1R-interactive. Of these, 72 kDa and 66 kDa polypeptides were identified as neurofilament L and alpha-internexin, respectively. A complex containing 80 kDa 4.1R, alpha-internexin and neurofilament L was immunoprecipitated with anti-4.1R antibodies from brain extract. We conclude that 4.1R interacts with the characteristic intermediate filament proteins of postsynaptic densities, and that the 4.1 proteins have the potential to mediate the interactions of diverse components of postsynaptic densities.     

Specialization of actin isoforms derived from the loss of key interactions with regulatory factors

A paradox of eukaryotic cells is that while some species assemble a complex actin cytoskeleton from a single ortholog, other species utilize a greater diversity of actin isoforms. The physiological consequences of using different actin isoforms, and the molecular mechanisms by which highly conserved actin isoforms are segregated into distinct networks, are poorly known. Here, we sought to understand how a simple biological system, composed of a unique actin and a limited set of actin‐binding proteins, reacts to a switch to heterologous actin expression. Using yeast as a model system and biomimetic assays, we show that such perturbation causes drastic reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton. Our results indicate that defective interaction of a heterologous actin for important regulators of actin assembly limits certain actin assembly pathways while reinforcing others. Expression of two heterologous actin variants, each specialized in assembling a different network, rescues cytoskeletal organization and confers resistance to external perturbation. Hence, while species using a unique actin have homeostatic actin networks, actin assembly pathways in species using several actin isoforms may act more independently.     

Synemin Isoforms in Astroglial and Neuronal Cells from Human Central Nervous System

The intermediate filament (IF) synemin gene encodes three IF proteins (H 180, M 150, L 41 kDa) with overlapping distributions. Synemin M was present early with vimentin and nestin. Synemin H was found later in the nervous system and mesodermic derivatives concomitantly with angiogenesis and the migration of neural crest cells. Synemin L appeared later in neurons. A series of in vitro cell cultures were done to identify the linkage between synemin isoforms and specific cell types of the central nervous system (CNS). The neurons and glia from the brains of humans and rats were cultured and double immunostaining done with antibodies against the H/M or L synemin isoforms and neural cell types (βIII-tubulin or NeuN) or astrocyte intermediate filaments (GFAP or vimentin). In neurons of the CNS, synemin H/M were co-expressed with GFAP, vimentin or nestin in glial cells, whereas synemin L was found in neurons.     

Theoretical kinetic studies of models for binding myosin subfragment-1 to regulated actin: Hill model versus Geeves model

It was previously shown that a one-dimensional Ising model could successfully simulate the equilibrium binding of myosin S1 to regulated actin filaments (T. L. Hill, E. Eisenberg and L. Greene, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77:3186-3190, 1980). However, the time course of myosin S1 binding to regulated actin was thought to be incompatible with this model, and a three-state model was subsequently developed (D. F. McKillop and M. A. Geeves, Biophys. J. 65:693-701, 1993). A quantitative analysis of the predicted time course of myosin S1 binding to regulated actin, however, was never done for either model. Here we present the procedure for the theoretical evaluation of the time course of myosin S1 binding for both models and then show that 1) the Hill model can predict the "lag" in the binding of myosin S1 to regulated actin that is observed in the absence of Ca++ when S1 is in excess of actin, and 2) both models generate very similar families of binding curves when [S1]/[actin] is varied. This result shows that, just based on the equilibrium and pre-steady-state kinetic binding data alone, it is not possible to differentiate between the two models. Thus, the model of Hill et al. cannot be ruled out on the basis of existing pre-steady-state and equilibrium binding data. Physical mechanisms underlying the generation of the lag in the Hill model are discussed.     

Cortical actin filaments in guard cells respond differently to abscisic acid in wild-type and abi1-1 mutant Arabidopsis

Cortical actin filaments in guard cells of Commelina communis L. show signal-specific organization during stomatal movements [S.-O. Eun and Y. Lee (1997) Plant Physiol 115: 1491–1498; S.-O. Eun and Y. Lee (2000) Planta 210: 1014–1017]. To study the roles of actin in signal transduction, it is advantageous to use Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh., an excellent model plant with numerous well-characterized mutants. Using an immunolocalization technique, we found that actin deployments in guard cells of A. thaliana were basically identical to those in C. communis: actin proteins were assembled into radial filaments under illumination, and were disassembled by ABA. In addition, we examined actin organization in an ABA-insensitive mutant (abi1-1) to test the involvement of protein phosphatase 2C (PP2C) in the control of actin structure. A clear difference was observed after ABA treatment, namely, neither stomatal closing nor depolymerization of actin filaments was observed in guard cells of the mutant. Our results indicate that PP2C participates in ABA-induced actin changes in guard cells. Received: 23 June 2000 / Accepted: 20 October 2000     

The ends of tropomyosin are major determinants of actin affinity and myosin subfragment 1-induced binding to F-actin in the open state

Tropomyosin (TM) is thought to exist in equilibrium between two states on F-actin, closed and open [Geeves, M. A., and Lehrer, S. S. (1994) Biophys. J. 67, 273-282]. Myosin shifts the equilibrium to the open state in which myosin binds strongly and develops force. Tropomyosin isoforms, that primarily differ in their N- and C-terminal sequences, have different equilibria between the closed and open states. The aim of the research is to understand how the alternate ends of TM affect cooperative actin binding and the relationship between actin affinity and the cooperativity with which myosin S1 promotes binding of TM to actin in the open state. A series of rat alpha-tropomyosin variants was expressed in Escherichia coli that are identical except for the ends, which are encoded by exons 1a or 1b and exons 9a, 9c or 9d. Both the N- and C-terminal sequences, and the particular combination within a TM molecule, determine actin affinity. Compared to tropomyosins with an exon 1a-encoded N-terminus, found in long isoforms, the exon 1b-encoded sequence, expressed in 247-residue nonmuscle tropomyosins, increases actin affinity in tropomyosins expressing 9a or 9d but has little effect with 9c, a brain-specific exon. The relative actin affinities, in decreasing order, are 1b9d > 1b9a > acetylated 1a9a > 1a9d > 1a9a > or = 1a9c congruent with 1b9c. Myosin S1 greatly increases the affinity of all tropomyosin variants for actin. In this, the actin affinity is the primary factor in the cooperativity with which myosin S1 induces TM binding to actin in the open state; generally, the higher the actin affinity, the lower the occupancy by myosin required to saturate the actin with tropomyosin: 1b9d >1a9d> 1b9a > or = acetylated 1a9a > 1a9a > 1a9c congruent with 1b9c.     

A model of cross-bridge attachment to actin in the A*M*ATP state based on x-ray diffraction from permeabilized rabbit psoas muscle

A model of cross-bridges binding to actin in the weak binding A*M*ATP state is presented. The modeling was based on the x-ray diffraction patterns from the relaxed skinned rabbit psoas muscle fibers where ATP hydrolysis was inhibited by N-phenylmaleimide treatment (S. Xu, J. Gu, G. Melvin, L. C. Yu. 2002. Biophys. J. 82:2111-2122). Calculations included both the myosin filaments and the actin filaments of the muscle cells, and the binding to actin was assumed to be single headed. To achieve a good fit, considerable flexibility in the orientation of the myosin head and the position of the S1-S2 junction is necessary, such that the myosin head can bind to a nearby actin whereas the tail end was kept in the proximity of the helical track of the myosin filament. Hence, the best-fit model shows that the head binds to actin in a wide range of orientations, and the tail end deviates substantially from its lattice position in the radial direction (approximately 60 A). Surprisingly, the best fit model reveals that the detached head, whose location thus far has remained undetected, seems to be located close to the surface of the myosin filament. Another significant requirement of the best-fit model is that the binding site on actin is near the N terminus of the actin subunit, a position distinct from the putative rigor-binding site. The results support the idea that the essential role played by the weak binding states M*ATP <--> A*M*ATP for force generation lies in its flexibility, because the probability of attachment is greatly increased, compared with the weak binding M*ADP*P(i) <--> A*M*ADP*P(i) states.