Synthetic promoter libraries--tuning of gene expression

The study of gene function often requires changing the expression of a gene and evaluating the consequences. In principle, the expression of any given gene can be modulated in a quasi-continuum of discrete expression levels but the traditional approaches are usually limited to two extremes: gene knockout and strong overexpression. However, applications such as metabolic optimization and control analysis necessitate a continuous set of expression levels with only slight increments in strength to cover a specific window around the wild-type expression level of the studied gene; this requirement can be met by using promoter libraries. This approach generally consists of inserting a library of promoters in front of the gene to be studied, whereby the individual promoters might deviate either in their spacer sequences or bear slight deviations from the consensus sequence of a vegetative promoter. Here, we describe the two different methods for obtaining promoter libraries and compare their applicability.     

Engineering promoter regulation

Systems for easily controlled, conditional induction or repression of gene expression are indispensable tools in fundamental research and industrial-scale biotechnological applications. Both native and rationally designed inducible promoters have been widely used for this purpose. However, inherent regulation modalities or toxic, expensive or inconvenient inducers can impose limitations on their use. Tailored promoters with user-specified regulatory properties would permit sophisticated manipulations of gene expression. Here, we report a generally applicable strategy for the directed evolution of promoter regulation. Specifically, we applied random mutagenesis and a multi-stage flow cytometry screen to isolate mutants of the oxygen-responsive Saccharomyces cerevisiae DAN1 promoter. Two mutants were isolated which were induced under less-stringent anaerobiosis than the wild-type promoter enabling induction of gene expression in yeast fermentations simply by oxygen depletion during cell growth. Moreover, the engineered promoters showed a markedly higher maximal expression than the unmutated DAN1 promoter, under both fastidious anaerobiosis and microaerobisois.     

细菌启动子识别及应用研究进展

细菌启动子是细菌中基因表达的必需调控元件,决定了细菌基因表达的强度和时机。通过启动子的插入或缺失,可以改变细菌基因的表达,实现对菌体生长发育以及代谢调控的研究。启动子也是构建各种表达系统、实现异源基因表达的基础。启动子的识别和应用研究,对于实现异源基因的可控表达、有效获得目的产物、促进生物催化和代谢工程研究具有重要的意义。以下对细菌启动子进行了简单的介绍,总结了细菌启动子的识别方法,并对细菌启动子的研究进展和具体应用进行了概述。     

Construction and analysis of in vivo activity of E. coli promoter hybrids and promoter mutants that alter the -35 to -10 spacing

A series of promoter hybrids has been constructed by exchanging the ? 35 and ? 10 regions of lacUV5, tet, and trp promoters. These three promoters and the six hybrid promoters constructed from them have been inserted into a pKO plasmid which places galactokinase expression under the control of the inserted promoter. Additionally, promoter mutants were prepared which had altered the spacing between the ? 35 and ? 10 regions of the promoter. Derivatives of the tet promoter with one or two extra base pairs in this spacer region and constructions of the lac:: tet hybrid promoter with two different spacings have been inserted into the galactokinase expression plasmid. Measurements of galactokinase levels in strains harboring these plasmids permited the comparison of in vivo activities of the promoters. The strongest of the hybrid promoters (order: ? 35, ? 10) were trp:: lac and trp:: tet suggesting a high efficiency for the ? 35 region of the trp promoter. The weakest promoters were tet:: trp, lac:: trp and lac::tet indicating a weak ? 10 region for the trp promoter and the importance of ? 35 to ? 10 spacing. Analysis of activity of related promoters with differences in spacing indicated that a distance of 19 bp yields a very weak promoter, and that 18 bp is less active than the 17-bp spacing, which is the most frequently found spacing in promoters.     

Combination of viral promoter sequences to generate highly active promoters for heterologous therapeutic protein over-expression in plants

To develop strong promoters for protein over-expression in both dicots and monocots, we constructed a new family of chimeric promoters using sequences of the Commelina Yellow Mosaic Virus (CoYMV), of the Cassava Vein Mosaic Virus (CsVMV) and activating sequences from the CaMV 35S promoter. The chimeric promoters were cloned upstream from the gusA reporter gene. The constructs were used in transient expression experiments, via DNA-coated gold particle delivery to tobacco leaves and maize endosperms. The results showed that candidates among the chimeric promoters could drive expression of the reporter gene to very high levels in the dicot plant tobacco, and all chimeric promoters showed higher expression in maize endosperm than the maize γ-zein promoter used as reference for the monocot expression. Expression cassettes were then used in stable tobacco transformation. Determination of GUS activity throughout growth of the primary transformants showed that two promoters (MPr1163 and MPr1165) could drive expression three to five-fold higher than the highly efficient enhanced 35S promoter. The use of MPr1163 was additionally validated for successful heterologous protein production of human lactoferrin in tobacco via agroinfiltration.     

Comparison of promoter region constructs for in vivo intramuscular expression

BACKGROUND: High transgene expression is generally expected after gene transfer. However, different level, kinetics and localization of expression might be needed for relevant therapeutic applications. Former studies have compared various promoter regions driving gene expression leading to conflicting results. In the present work, two promoter families have been compared using the efficient in vivo intramuscular electrotransfer technique. METHODS: Three promoter regions were constructed by associating the strong ubiquitous cytomegalovirus (CMV) enhancer-promoter to its homologous intron A or to a heterologous intron, or to a hybrid intron. Promoter regions derived from the muscle creatine kinase (MCK) promoter were also studied. The expression of the same transgene (SeAP or neurotrophin-3) under control of these different promoters was compared after plasmid electrotransfer in mouse tibialis-cranialis skeletal muscle. RESULTS: Heterologous intron association to the CMV promoter did not modify gene expression kinetics nor increase gene expression level. Usefulness of intron A or hybrid intron association to the CMV promoter depended on the gene. The various MCK promoters drove efficient gene expression but lower than that obtained with the CMV promoter. Furthermore, peak value was reached earlier with MCK promoter regions (14 days). CONCLUSION: For applications of gene transfer restricted to skeletal muscle, the MCK promoter or a MCK promoter variant would be a promising alternative to the CMV promoter. Indeed, it has been demonstrated that the use of MCK promoter limits humoral and cell-mediated immune responses. Furthermore, the MCK promoter decreases the initial expression peak that may be detrimental, drives a sustained gene expression, and improves gene transfer safety.     

Microarray profiling and identification of core promoter sequence in Gordonia

Gordonia are Gram-positive bacteria which have immense biotechnological potential. Genomes of several Gordonia spp. have been sequenced but a detailed analysis of the differentially expressed genes during growth, the promoters which drive their expression and the information on the core promoter sequence is lacking. Here, we report the identification of core promoter sequence in Gordonia sp. IITR100. The GC content of the promoters was found to be within a range of 62–65%. The 5′-UTR length in the genes was also analysed and about 56% promoters were found to have long 5′-UTR. The functionality of the promoters was validated by microarray profiling. Based on the differential expression of genes, two growth phase dependent promoters PdsbA and Pglx were isolated and analysed. They add to the existing repertoire of the promoters functional in both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. Our results suggest that the core promoter sequence identified is conserved in members of Gordonia spp. and is similar to that of other members of Actinobacteria.