The epidemiology of tomato mosaic: Sources of TMV in commercial tomato crops under glass

Of the several possible sources of tomato mosaic virus, seeds and root debris in the soil are considered to be of greatest importance. A survey of 374,000 seedlings on ten commercial holdings found 0.05% of them infected, and although these were removed virus had been spread to other young plants which did not show infection when transplanted into the growing houses, seven of twenty-two of which contained a few infected plants when sampled shortly after planting. Virus overwintering on clothing, and debris on structures, are thought to be of minor importance, and smoking tobacco is seldom a source of infection for the tomato crop. A further survey of seventy-eight samples from tomato crops in Britain confirmed the 1960-61 survey: all were infected with tomato strains of TMV, none with tobacco strains, but one of the 187 infected seedlings referred to above was carrying a tobacco strain. Petunia was not as satisfactory as a special cultivar of White Burley tobacco for distinguishing between the tobacco and tomato TMV isolates. Observations and tests on a commercial holding showed that TMV was readily carried from plants in infected glasshouses into clean ones by workers, and once introduced, spread rapidly within the crop.     

The movement of tobacco mosaic viruses and potato virus X through tomato plants

Tomato aucuba mosaic virus, tobacco mosaic virus and potato virus X took 3'5-4, 5 and 3 days respectively to move from inoculated tomato leaflets into the petioles and stems
On reaching the stem each virus usually first moved downward, but in some plants both upward and downward movement occurred simultaneously and in a few
upward movement occurred first.
All three viruses travelled through the stem at approximately the same rate. Each was capable of travelling more than 80 cm. during the first 12 hr. after entering the stem, giving a minimal average rate of about 8 cm. per hr.
Uninfected pieces of stem invariably occurred between infected pieces. Maximum lengths of stem through which virus particles had apparently passed without causing infection, were 44.5, 49 and 39 cm. for the three viruses.     

Role of soil, crop debris, and a plant pathogen in Salmonella enterica contamination of tomato plants

Background

In the U.S., tomatoes have become the most implicated vehicle for produce-associated Salmonellosis with 12 outbreaks since 1998. Although unconfirmed, trace backs suggest pre-harvest contamination with Salmonella enterica. Routes of tomato crop contamination by S. enterica in the absence of direct artificial inoculation have not been investigated.

Methodology/Principal Findings

This work examined the role of contaminated soil, the potential for crop debris to act as inoculum from one crop to the next, and any interaction between the seedbourne plant pathogen Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria and S. enterica on tomato plants. Our results show S. enterica can survive for up to six weeks in fallow soil with the ability to contaminate tomato plants. We found S. enterica can contaminate a subsequent crop via crop debris; however a fallow period between crop incorporation and subsequent seeding can affect contamination patterns. Throughout these studies, populations of S. enterica declined over time and there was no bacterial growth in either the phyllosphere or rhizoplane. The presence of X. campestris pv. vesicatoria on co-colonized tomato plants had no effect on the incidence of S. enterica tomato phyllosphere contamination. However, growth of S. enterica in the tomato phyllosphere occurred on co-colonized plants in the absence of plant disease.

Conclusions/Significance

S. enterica contaminated soil can lead to contamination of the tomato phyllosphere. A six week lag period between soil contamination and tomato seeding did not deter subsequent crop contamination. In the absence of plant disease, presence of the bacterial plant pathogen, X. campestris pv. vesicatoria was beneficial to S. enterica allowing multiplication of the human pathogen population. Any event leading to soil contamination with S. enterica could pose a public health risk with subsequent tomato production, especially in areas prone to bacterial spot disease.     

The effects of rootstock and scion on tobacco mosaic virus infection in susceptible, tolerant and immune cultivars of tomato

Reciprocal grafts were made between tomato cultivars Potentate, susceptible, and Virocross, tolerant (heterozygous for resistance gene Tm-i) to tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) isolates of Pelham type o and between isogenic lines of cv. Craigella, susceptible and homozygous for gene Tm-i. The grafted plants were inoculated with a type o isolate; both scion and stock inoculation were studied in the former, scion inoculation only, in the latter. With scion inoculation the virus content of a tolerant scion was greater on a susceptible stock than on a tolerant one, but that of a susceptible scion was unaffected by the type of stock: in contrast, the virus content of a tolerant stock was unaffected by the type of scion but that of a susceptible stock was less with a tolerant than with a susceptible scion. With root inoculation the virus contents of both tolerant and susceptible scions were greater on a susceptible than on a tolerant stock. With cv. Craigella the genotype Tm-1/Tm-1 was found to be immune to the type o isolate used, but in grafts the leaves of Tm-1/Tm-1 scions became tolerant to leaf inoculation when on susceptible stocks and the virus entered the stock. Tm-1/Tm-1 stocks became infected when attached to infected, susceptible scions and did not affect the virus content of those scions. The results indicate that a susceptible healthy stock may change the reaction of a tolerant or immune scion to infection by a strain of TMV.     

Enzyme immunoassay determination of atrazine degradation in soil: Moisture,sterilization, and storage effects

Enzyme immunoassay (EIA) microtiter plate analysis was used to quantify atrazine (2‐chloro‐4‐ethylamino‐6‐isopropylamino‐1,3,5 triazine), fortified at 0, 50, and 500 or 549 ng/g, to Baxter and Maury silt loam soil sampled in 1965 and 1991. In the first experiment, aged soils (sampled in 1965 and stored air‐dried) were fortified with atrazine and then incubated in the dark at 0, 75, 150, 225 and 300 g/kg moisture for 15, 80, 154, and 289 d. In a second experiment, fresh soils were fortified with atrazine and incubated in the dark at 0, 150, and 300 g/kg moisture for 9, 15, 35, 55, 83, and 145 d. One half of the treatments in the second experiment were sterilized with 497 ng/g HgCl₂. Twenty milliliters of acetonitrile: water (9: 1) was used to extract 4 or 5 g of soil by vortex mixing at each sampling date. The soil extract was diluted, 80 μl incubated with antibody‐coated wells, and color development read using a microtiter plate reader. Recovery of atrazine from soil was 98% 5 d after fortification. Pesticide recoveries and first‐order degradation rates were dependent on the freshness and moisture content of the soil sample. Pesticide degradation was slower and recoveries higher in soil that had been air dried and stored since 1965, prior to fortification. More atrazine was extracted from soil maintained at 0 g/kg moisture than from soil maintained at 300 g/kg moisture over time.