A Somatic Origin of Homologous Robertsonian Translocations and Isochromosomes

One t(14q14q), three t(15q15q), two t(21q21q), and two t(22q22q) nonmosaic, apparently balanced, de novo Robertsonian translocation cases were investigated with polymorphic markers to establish the origin of the translocated chromosomes. Four cases had results indicative of an isochromosome: one t(14q14q) case with mild mental retardation and maternal uniparental disomy (UPD) for chromosome 14, one t(15q15q) case with the Prader-Willi syndrome and UPD(15), a phenotypically normal carrier of t(22q22q) with maternal UPD(22), and a phenotypically normal t(21q21q) case of paternal UPD(21). All UPD cases showed complete homozygosity throughout the involved chromosome, which is supportive of a postmeiotic origin. In the remaining four cases, maternal and paternal inheritance of the involved chromosome was found, which unambiguously implies a somatic origin. One t(15q15q) female had a child with a ring chromosome 15, which was also of probable postmeiotic origin as recombination between grandparental haplotypes had occurred prior to ring formation. UPD might be expected to result from de novo Robertsonian translocations of meiotic origin; however, all de novo homologous translocation cases, so far reported, with UPD of chromosomes 14, 15, 21, or 22 have been isochromosomes. These data provide the first direct evidence that nonmosaic Robertsonian translocations, as well as isochromosomes, are commonly the result of a mitotic exchange.     

Unusual chromosomal mosaicism as a cause of mental retardation and congenital malformations in a familial reciprocal translocation carrier, t(17;22)(q24.2;q11.23)

Familial reciprocal translocations are generally without phenotypic effect, although there is some evidence for a small excess of mental retardation and congenital malformations (MR/CM) in children carrying familial reciprocal translocations. Possible mechanisms whereby such translocations could have a phenotypic effect include cryptic unbalanced rearrangements, uniparental disomy, and disruption of putative genes at the breakpoints, unmasking recessive alleles on the normal homologs. Mosaicism for a supernumerary derivative chromosome in a carrier of a familial reciprocal translocation has not yet been described. We report a boy presenting with MR/CM and a familial reciprocal translocation, t(17;22)(q24.2;q11.23), inherited from the mother. Cytogenetic analysis of peripheral blood lymphocytes showed a balanced karyotype in all 32 analyzed metaphase spreads. Molecular genetic analysis was consistent with biparental origin of the normal homologs. In metaphase spreads from skin fibroblasts a supernumerary chromosome was found in all 24 cells analyzed and could be identified as der(22)t(17;22)(q24.2;q11.23). Several possible segregation modes at meiosis I followed by meiosis II or postzygotic nondisjunction of the der(22) might have led to this unusual chromosomal mosaicism. We propose hidden mosaicism as a possible cause for MR/CM in patients who apparently carry a balanced familial reciprocal translocation.     

De novo balanced chromosome rearrangements and extra marker chromosomes identified at prenatal diagnosis: clinical significance and distribution of breakpoints.

A questionnaire sent to major cytogenetics laboratories in the United States and Canada over a 10-year period collected data on the frequency and outcome of cases with either apparently balanced de novo rearrangements or de novo supernumerary marker chromosomes detected at amniocentesis. Of 377,357 reported amniocenteses, approximately 1/2,000 had a de novo reciprocal translocation, 1/9,000 a Robertsonian translocation, 1/10,000 a de novo inversion, and 1/2,500 an extra structurally abnormal chromosome of unidentifiable origin. The risk of a serious congenital anomaly was estimated to be 6.1% (n = 163) for de novo reciprocal translocations, 3.7% (n = 51) for Robertsonian translocations, and 9.4% (n = 32) for inversions. The combined risk for reciprocal translocations and inversions was 6.7% (95% confidence limits 3.1%-10.3%). The risk of abnormality for extra nonsatellited marker chromosomes was 14.7% (n = 68), and that for satellited marker chromosomes was 10.9% (n = 55). In non-Robertsonian rearrangements, distribution of breakpoints among chromosomes was not as would be expected strictly on the basis of length. Most breaks were stated to occur within G-negative bands, but there was little evidence of particular hot spots among these bands. Nevertheless, there did appear to be a correlation between those bands in which breakage was observed most often and those bands where common or rare fragile sites have been described.     

A de novo 3p13 deletion induced by a complex chromosomal rearrangement combined with a pericentric inversion of chromosome,inv(3)(p13q12), and a translocation between chromosome 3 and 8, t(3;8)(q13.1;q24.2), in a child with developmental delay

A de novo complex chromosomal rearrangement is very rare but likely to be present in a child with developmental disabilities and physical alterations. A child presented in this study showed global developmental delay and some typical phenotypes. Initial karyotyping and FISH analysis in the patient showed an apparently de novo balanced translocation between chromosome 3 and 8, t(3;8)(q13.1;q24.2). Further analysis using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and array-based comparative genomic hybridization revealed a cryptic microdeletion on 3p13 region. Nearly one-third of balanced rearrangements are reported to involve cryptic disruptions at breakpoints, however, the microdeletion of the proposita was present in non-translocated region of the chromosome 3. After careful reevaluation of the results, a pericentric inversion, inv(3)(p13q13.1) that induced deletion was revealed. The clinical features of developmental delay in cognition, language, and motor function and facial and physical phenotype of the proposita were similar to those found in the children with 3p13 deletion. This case shows that combined molecular cytogenetic techniques with routine karyotyping are very useful to identify subtle genomic changes associated with abnormal phenotypes.     

Mental retardation associated with "balanced" chromosome rearrangements.

Balanced chromosome rearrangements were found in seven of 455 retarded children vs. four of 1,679 nonretarded, psychiatric children (P less than .05). The combined incidence of non-Robertsonian balanced rearrangements from this and reported surveys of the mentally retarded was five times greater than that from newborn surveys, whereas Robertsonian translocations were not increased among the retarded. The combined data show an increase in de novo rather than familial rearrangements among the retarded; the increase in de novo rearrangements is specifically for non-Robertsonian translocation.     

Molecular cytogenetic characterization of 17 rob(13q14q) Robertsonian translocations by FISH, narrowing the region containing the breakpoints.

We have characterized 17 rob(13q14q) Robertsonian translocations, using six molecular probes that hybridize to the repetitive sequences of the centromeric and shortarm regions of the five acrocentric chromosomes by FISH. The rearrangements include six de novo rearrangements and the chromosomally normal parents, five maternally and three paternally inherited translocations, and three translocations of unknown origin. The D21Z1/D13Z1 and D14Z1/D22Z1 centromeric alpha-satellite DNA probes showed all rob(13q14q) chromosomes to be dicentric. The rDNA probes did not show hybridization on any of the 17 cases studied. The pTRS-47 satellite III DNA probe specific for chromosomes 14 and 22 was retained around the breakpoints in all cases. However, the pTRS-63 satellite III DNA probe specific for chromosome 14 did not show any signals on the translocation chromosomes examined. In 16 of 17 translocations studied, strong hybridization signals on the translocations were detected with the pTRI-6 satellite I DNA probe specific for chromosome 13. All parents of the six de novo rob(13q14q), including one whose pTRI-6 sequence was lost, showed strong positive hybridization signals on each pair of chromosomes 14 and 13, with pTRS-47, pTRS-63, and pTRI-6. Therefore, the translocation breakpoints in the majority of rob(13q14q) are between the pTRS-47 and pTRS-63 sequences in the p11 region of chromosome 14 and between the pTRI-6 and rDNA sequences within the p11 region of chromosome 13.     

Homozygous Robertsonian translocations in a fetus with 44 chromosomes

Summary We report the unique finding of a human fetus with 44 chromosomes with homozygous 14;21 translocations. This fetus appeared phenotypically normal but the long-term neurodevelopmental outcome had this pregnancy continued could not be predicted. We speculate one 14;21 translocation was inherited from her father and one arose de novo being maternal in origin. A previous sibling with psychomotor retardation has an abnormal chromosome complement of 45,XX,dup(7)(q21pter), t(14;21)(p11;q11). The mother's underlying disease, systemic lupus erythematosis (SLE), and her prior chemotherapy may have contributed to the appearance of these chromosome aberrations. It is interesting that although 14;21 translocations are among the commonest structural chromosome rearrangements in man, there are no previous reports in newborn surveys of a child with 44 chromosomes resulting from the mating of two identical Robertsonian translocation carrier parents.     

Disease associated balanced chromosome rearrangements (DBCR): report of two new cases

Disease associated balanced chromosome rearrangements (DBCR) causing truncation, deletion, inactivation or over-expression of specific genes are instrumental in identifying and cloning several disease genes and are estimated to be much more common than anticipated. In one survey, the minimal frequency of combined balanced de novo reciprocal translocations and inversions causing abnormal phenotype is estimated to be 0.17%, a sixfold increase compared to the general population suggesting a causative linkage between the abnormality and the observed phenotypic traits. Here, we report two new cases of apparently balanced de novo translocations resulting in developmental delay and dysmorphic features.     

The frequency and mutation rate of balanced autosomal rearrangements in man estimated from prenatal genetic studies for advanced maternal age.

The frequencies of balanced chromosome rearrangements were estimated from three series of advanced maternal-age prenatal genetic studies, and were compared to the frequencies that had been estimated from consecutive newborn surveys. In the maternal-age prenatal studies, the frequencies were: Robertsonian translocations, 0.11%; reciprocal translocations, 0.17%; and inversions, 0.12%. The total frequency of balanced rearrangements in the prenatal genetic studies performed with banding (0.40%, or 1 in 250) was twice that in the consecutive newborn surveys performed without banding (0.19%, or 1 in 526). The difference was limited to inversions and reciprocal translocations; the frequency of Robertsonian translocations was similar in the prenatal series and the newborn surveys. Both familial and de novo rearrangements were more common than anticipated. The de novo cases provided a mutation rate estimate of 4.3 per 10,000 gametes per generation (compared with 1.78 to 2.2 per 10,000 gametes in other surveys). These higher estimates may more reliably approximate the true mutation rate and frequencies of balanced rearrangements in the newborn population than do the newborn surveys.     

A jumping Robertsonian translocation: a molecular and cytogenetic study

We report a patient with mosaicism for two different Robertsonian translocations, both involving chromosome 21. She carries an unbalanced cell line with an i(21q) and a balanced cell line with a rob(21q22q). She is phenotypically normal but has two children who inherited the i(21q) and have Down syndrome. We demonstrate that both abnormal chromosomes are dicentric and that the proband’s 21/21 rearrangement is an isochromosome formed from a maternally derived chromosome 21. We propose a model in which the i(21q) is the progenitor rearrangement in the proband, which subsequently participated in a nonreciprocal rearrangement characteristic of a jumping translocation. In addition, we review other cases of constitutional mosaicism involving jumping translocations. Received: 4 October 1995 / Revised: 14 February 1996     

A molecular genetic approach to the identification of isochromosomes of chromosome 21

Summary The largest class of de novo chromosomal rearrangements in Down syndrome are rea(21q21q). Classically, these rearrangements have been termed Robertsonian translocations, implying an attachment of two different chromosome 21 homologues. Additionally, a Robertsonian translocation between two chromosomes 21 cannot be distinguished from an isochromosome composed of genetically identical arms by cytogenetic analyses. Therefore, we have used molecular techniques to differentiate between true Robertsonian translocations and isochromosomes. Samples were obtained from 12 probands, ascertained for de novo rearrangements between homologous chromosomes 21 [11 rea(21q21q) and 1 rea (21;21)(q22;q22)], their parents (n = 24) and available siblings (n = 7). The parental origins of the de novo rearrangements were assigned using molecular and cytogenetic analyses. Although not statistically significant, there was a two-fold increase in the number of paternally derived de novo rearrangements (n = 8) as compared with maternally derived rearrangements (n = 4). To distinguish between rob(21q21q) and i(21q), we used restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) spanning the length of chromosome 21. Using all informative and partially informative RFLPs, we used the method of maximum likelihood to assign the most likely rearrangement definition (i or rob) and parental origin in each family. The maximum likelihood estimates indicated that all rearrangements tested (n = 8) were isochromosomes. C-banding revealed two centromeres in three cases indicating that a U-type exchange occurred between sister chromatids in these rearrangements. Our results suggest that the majority of de novo rea(21q21q) are isochromosomes derived from a single parental chromosome 21.     

Molecular characterization of de novo secondary trisomy 13.

Unbalanced Robertsonian translocations are a significant cause of mental retardation and fetal wastage. The majority of homologous rearrangements of chromosome 21 in Down syndrome have been shown to be isochromosomes. Aside from chromosome 21, very little is known about other acrocentric homologous rearrangements. In this study, four cases of de novo secondary trisomy 13 are presented. FISH using alpha-satellite sequences, rDNA, and a pTRI-6 satellite I sequence specific to the short arm of chromosome 13 showed all four rearrangements to be dicentric and apparently devoid of ribosomal genes. Three of four rearrangements retained the pTRI-6 satellite I sequence. Case 1 was the exception, showing a deletion of this sequence in the rearrangement, although both parental chromosomes 13 had strong positive hybridization signals. Eleven microsatellite markers from chromosome 13 were also used to characterize the rearrangements. Of the four possible outcomes, one maternal Robertsonian translocation, two paternal isochromosomes, and one maternal isochromosome were observed. A double recombination was observed in the maternally derived rob(13q13q). No recombination events were detected in any isochromosome. The parental origins and molecular chromosomal structure of these cases are compared with previous studies of de novo acrocentric rearrangements.     

Inherited pericentric inversion of chromosome no. 2 with Robertsonian translocation (13q 14q) resulting in trisomy for chromosome 13q

This report includes a patient with an inherited pericentric inversion of chromosome No. 2 in addition to a Robertsonian translocation resulting in trisomy for chromosome 13q. The chromosomal constitution of the proband was 46,XX,inv(2) (pter leads to p11 : : q14 leads to p11 : : q14 leads to qter); t(13,14) (13qter leads to 13p11 : : 14q11 leads to 14qter). Sequential QFQ, RFA and GTG banding techniques were employed on the chromosomes of all family members. The chromosomal constitutions of the father and his first child were normal while the mother had an inversion of chromosome No. 2 [46,XX,inv(2) (pter leads to p11 : : q14 leads to p11 : : q14 leads to qter)]. The proband inherited this abnormal chromosome. In addition, she had a de novo Robertsonian translocation involving chromosomes 13q and 14q resulting in trisomy of chromosome 13q.     

De novo balanced complex chromosome rearrangement (CCR) involving chromosome 8, 11 and 16 in a boy with mild developmental delay and psychotic disorder

Congenital Complex Chromosome rearrangements (CCRs) compatible with life are rare in humans. We report a de novo CCR involving chromosomes 8, 11 and 16 with 4 breakpoints in a patient with mild dysmorphic features, acquisition delay and psychotic disorder. Conventional cytogenetic analysis revealed an apparently balanced 8;16 translocation. Further FISH analysis with WCP 8 and WCP 16 probes revealed the presence of a third chromosome involved in the translocation. The multicolour karyotype confirmed the complexity of the rearrangement and showed that the derivative chromosome 8 was composed of 3 distinct segments derived from chromosomes 8, 16 and 11. The breakpoints of this complex rearrangement were located at 8q21, 11q14, 11q23 and 16q12. Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and array-CGH were performed to investigate the possibility of any genomic imbalance as a result of the complex rearrangement. No imbalance was detected by these two techniques. Our study showed: i) the necessity to confirm reciprocal translocations with FISH using painting probes, particularly when the karyotype resolution is weak; ii) the usefulness of multicolour karyotype for the characterization of structural chromosomal rearrangements, particularly when they are complex; iii) the usefulness of CGH and array-CGH in cases of abnormal phenotype and apparently balanced rearrangement in order to explore the breakpoints and to detect additional imbalances.     

Chromosome translocations: study of 232 cases originating from 144 families

Between 1974 and 1987, 232 translocation carriers have been detected in our Center; they belong to 144 different families. Indications for chromosome analysis were the following: familial studies in relation with a patient suggesting a chromosome anomaly (25.4%); mental retardation with or without malformations (24.6%); 2 or more spontaneous abortions (17.2%); infertility problems, mainly male (16.4%); genetic counseling for a non-chromosomal disease (9.5%); prenatal diagnosis in risk pregnancies (6.9%). The chromosome anomalies detected were the following; balanced Robertsonian fusions (114 cases = 49.1%); balanced translocations (74 cases = 31.9%); unbalanced translocations, Robertsonian fusions included (44 cases = 19%). Two groups may be distinguished: the first one confirms data already known, such as high frequency of balanced translocations in couples with multiple abortions, or in infertile males. The second group on the contrary shows more unusual observations: 4 cases of standard trisomy 21 born to young parents carriers of a balanced translocation not involving chromosome 21; 5 cases of trisomy 13 with 46 chromosomes and a Robertsonian fusion, born to parents carriers of a t(13q; Dq) (twice the mother and thrice the father); 14 cases of apparently balanced translocations, however with an abnormal phenotype; and finally 22 cases of balanced translocations incidentally detected during the course of investigations in patients with a genetic problem generally not associated with a chromosome defect.     

Human chromosome variation with two Robertsonian translocations

Summary A woman was found to have 42 autosomes due to engagement of both chromosomes 14 in Robertsonian rearrangements, one with a chromosome 21 and the other with a chromosome 22: t(14q21q) and t(14q22q). The two translocations appear monocentric and by silver staining have no rRNA activity. The t(14q21q) translocation is familial and was ascertained through a nephew with Down syndrome, while the origin of the t(14q22q) translocation was not established. In addition to these two translocations, the woman had XX/XXX sex chromosome mosaicism. She has had two recognized pregnancies, each resulting in the birth of a child with one of the two translocations. Both children are phenotypically normal, as is their mother, the first normal liveborn individual identified with two Robertsonian translocations.     

Uniparental heterodisomy for chromosome 14 in a phenotypically abnormal familial balanced 13/14 Robertsonian translocation carrier.

A 9-year-old mentally retarded girl with multiple congenital anomalies was found to carry a balanced 13/14 Robertsonian translocation [45,XX,t(13q14q)] which was also present in her father. Her mother carried a balanced reciprocal translocation between chromosomes 1 and 14 [46,XX,t(1;14) (q32;q32)]. Both of her parents were phenotypically normal. Molecular studies were carried out to determine the parental origin of chromosomes 1, 13, and 14 in the patient. Using probes for D14S13 and D14S22, we could show that the patient inherited both chromosomes 14 from her father and none from her mother. Similar studies using probes for chromosomes 1 (D1S76) and 13 (D13S37) loci showed the presence of both maternal and paternal alleles in the patient. Our findings indicate that paternal uniparental heterodisomy for chromosome 14 most likely accounts for the phenotypic abnormalities observed in our patient. It is suggested that uniparental disomy may be the basis for abnormal development in at least some phenotypically abnormal familial balanced-translocation carriers.     

Parental origin and timing of de novo Robertsonian translocation formation

Robertsonian translocations (ROBs) are the most common chromosomal rearrangements in humans. ROBs are whole-arm rearrangements between the acrocentric chromosomes 13-15, 21, and 22. ROBs can be classified into two groups depending on their frequency of occurrence, common (rob(13q14q) and rob(14q21q)), and rare (all remaining possible nonhomologous combinations). Herein, we have studied 29 case subjects of common and rare de novo ROBs to determine their parental origins and timing of formation. We compared these case subjects to 35 published case subjects of common ROBs and found that most common ROBs apparently have the same breakpoints and arise mainly during oogenesis (50/54). These probably form through a common mechanism and have been termed "class 1." Collectively, rare ROBs also occur mostly during oogenesis (7/10) but probably arise through a more "random" mechanism or a variety of mechanisms and have been termed "class 2." Thus, we demonstrate that although both classes of ROBs occur predominantly during meiosis, the common, class 1 ROBs occur primarily during oogenesis and likely form through a mechanism distinct from that forming class 2 ROBs.     

Recombination in a balanced complex translocation of a mother leading to a balanced reciprocal translocation in the child. Review of 60 cases of balanced complex translocations

We report an unusual case of a balanced reciprocal translocation with a recombinant chromosome which has arisen from a familial balanced complex translocation. Fluorescence in situ hybridization studies were essential for the identification of the breakpoints. A review of 60 cases of balanced complex translocations (BCT) has revealed three cases similar to ours. Carriers of BCT have a high risk of having spontaneous abortions or a child with an unbalanced karyotype. Certain types of balanced rearrangements involving an insertion can give rise to a simpler balanced translocation as a result of crossover. Our observations support the assumption that the chance that a de novo balanced complex translocation is associated with an abnormal phenotype increases with the number of breakpoints. Received: 27 March 1996 / Revised: 28 January 1997     

Breakpoint mapping and array CGH in translocations: comparison of a phenotypically normal and an abnormal cohort

We report the analyses of breakpoints in 31 phenotypically normal and 14 abnormal carriers of balanced translocations. Our study assesses the differences between balanced translocations in normal carriers and those in abnormal carriers, focusing on the presence of genomic imbalances at the breakpoints or elsewhere in the genome, presence of cryptic chromosome rearrangements, and gene disruption. Our hypothesis is that all four features will be associated with phenotypic abnormalities and absent or much less frequent in a normal population. In the normal cohort, we identified neither genomic imbalances at the breakpoints or elsewhere in the genome nor cryptic chromosome rearrangements. In contrast, we identified candidate disease-causing imbalances in 4/14 abnormal patients. These were three breakpoint associated deletions and three deletions unrelated to the breakpoints. All six de novo deletions originated on the paternally inherited chromosome. Additional complexity was also present in one of these cases. Gene disruption by the breakpoints was present in 16/31 phenotypically normal individuals and in 5/14 phenotypically abnormal patients. Our results show that translocations in phenotypically abnormal patients are molecularly distinct from those in normal individuals: the former are more likely to be associated with genomic imbalances at the breakpoints or elsewhere and with chromosomal complexity, whereas the frequency of gene disruption is similar in both normal and abnormal translocation carriers.