Water discharge-regulated bacteria/heterotrophic nanoflagellate (HNF) interactions in the water column of the river Rhine

Heterotrophic nanoflagellates (HNF) make up a large fraction of the zooplankton biomass of rivers. Their abundance can be strongly affected by water discharge, but the consequences of this highly dynamic factor for their main prey, the bacteria, is still unknown. The focus of this study was on bacterial/HNF interactions in the Lower River Rhine (Germany) with respect to the discharge-dependent dynamics. The bacterial and HNF abundances and biomasses were determined over the course of 17 months. The potential consumption of bacteria by HNF was calculated based on the biomass data and on data on the HNF production. The mean bacterial abundance in the Rhine at Cologne ranged from 0.3 x 10(6) to 3.5 x 10(6) cells mL(-1), with lowest abundances in winter and highest in late spring. No significant changes in abundance during the downstream passage were found. Neither could a significant correlation be found between bacterial and HNF abundance. The ratio of bacterial to HNF abundance showed high variations which lay between 166 and 19,055 and was negatively dependent on water discharge. Monthly routine calculations on the potential bacterial consumption by HNF revealed a clearance of between 2 and 82% of the bacterial standing stock d(-1). The values increased greatly with water discharge and could exceed 100% d(-1) at times of high water flow. The presented data suggests a change in the top-down control of the planktonic bacteria due to the water discharge: The importance of benthic predation at low water flow (high contact probability to benthic predators) gives way to an increased importance in predation by planktonic HNF at high water flow.     

Relationship between bacteria, phytoplankton and heterotrophic nanoflagellates along the trophic gradient

Bacterial and heterotrophic nanoflagellates (HNF) abundance, as well as bacterial production and chlorophylla levels, were measured at five sites extending from the coastal zone toward the open Adriatic in the period from March to October 1995. The investigated areas were grouped into trophic categories according to concentrations of chlorophylla. All the biotic-para-meters increased along the trophic gradient, leading to eutrophy, but they did not increase at the same rate. The bacterial biomass: phytoplankton biomass (BB: chla) ratio decreased from about 10 in the very oligotrophic area to 0.8 at the eutrophic site. In contrast, the bacterial abundance: HNF abundance ratio (B: HNF) increased from 1000 bacteria per 1 flagellate in the oligotrophic system to 1700 bacteria flagellate⁴ in the eutrophic area. Decreasing BB: chla and increasing B: HNF ratios along the trophic gradient might reflect the different structures of the microbial food web. Relationships between bacterial abundance and production, and chla and HNF showed that bacterial abundance along the trophic gradient was regulated by the interplay between nutrient supply and grazing pressure. But in the oligotrophic system, bacterial abundance was more closely related to bacterial production and chla than in the eutrophic system, suggesting stronger control of bacterial abundance by substrate supply. On the other hand, the coupling between bacteria and HNF, and uncoupling between bacterial abundance and production in the eutrophic system, showed that the importance of bacteriovory increased in richer systems.     

Seasonal and vertical distribution of planktonic bacteria and heterotrophic nanoflagellates in the middle Adriatic Sea

Temporal and spatial patterns of bacteria and heterotrophic nanoflagellates (HNF) were studied monthly from January 1997 to December 1998 in the middle Adriatic Sea. Bacterial and HNF relationships with phytoplankton biomass and temperature were analyzed to examine how the relative importance of bottom-up and top-down factors may shift over seasons and locations. For the coastal area, an inconsistent relationship between bacterial abundance and chlorophyll a and a stronger relationship between bacterial abundance and bacterial production suggest that other substrates than those of phytoplankton origin are important for bacteria. The analysis of simultaneous effects of temperature and bacterial production on bacterial abundance showed that the effect of temperature obscured the effects of bacterial production, suggesting that bacterial growth itself is highly temperature-dependent. The relationship between HNF abundance and bacterial abundance was slightly improved by the inclusion of in situ temperature, bacterial production or both parameters, as additional independent variables. About 60% of the variability in HNF abundance can be explained by bacterial abundance, bacterial production and temperature. In the open sea, tight coupling of bacterial abundance with chlorophyll a concentrations implied that phytoplankton-derived substrates have a dominant role in controlling bacterial abundance. During the colder months, bacterial abundance was high enough to support higher HNF abundance than observed, suggesting that predation exerted a minor depressing influence on bacterial abundance during that period. During the spring-summer period, HNF controlled bacterial standing stocks by direct cropping of bacterial production.Communicated by: H.-D. Franke     

Trophic interactions within the microbial food web in a tropical floodplain lake (Laguna Bufeos, Bolivia)

Whether the primary role of bacterioplankton is to act as "remineralizers" of nutrients or as direct nutritional source for higher trophic levels will depend on factors controlling their production and abundance. In tropical lakes, low nutrient concentration is probably the main factor limiting bacterial growth, while grazing by microzooplankton is generally assumed to be the main loss factor for bacteria. Bottom-up and top-down regulation of microbial abundance was studied in six nutrient limitation and dilution gradient-size fractionation in situ experiments. Bacteria, heterotrophic nanoflagellates (HNF), ciliates and rotifers showed relatively low densities. Predation losses of HNF and ciliates accounted for a major part of their daily production, suggesting a top-down regulation of protistan populations by rotifers. Phosphorus was found to be strongly limiting for bacterial growth, whereas no response to enrichment with Nitrogen or DOC was detected. HNF were the major grazers on bacteria (g-0.43 d(-1)), the grazing coefficient increased when ciliates were added (g- 0.80 d(-1)) but decreased when rotifers were added (g- 0.23 d(-1)) probably due to nutrient recycling or top-down control of HNF and ciliates by rotifers.     

Seasonal dynamics of crustacean zooplankton, heterotrophic nanoflagellates and bacteria in a shallow, eutrophic lake

1. The seasonal development of crustacean zooplankton, heterotrophic nanoflagellates (HNF) and bacteria was examined in Grosser Binnensee, a shallow, eutrophic lake in northern Germany. The grazing impact of Daphnia on bacteria and nanoflagellates was estimated from field data on population abundances and from clearance rates obtained in laboratory experiments. 2. The seasonal succession of zooplankton showed distinct peaks of Daphnia magna, cyclopopid copepods, Bosmina longirostris and Daphnia galeata and D. hynlina. The population dynamics of Dapfinia had the strongest impact on all sestonic components. Daphnia maxima coincided with clearwater phases, and were negatively correlated with particulate organic carbon (POC), HNF and phytoplankton. Bacterial abundance was only slightly affected although daphnids were at times more important as bacterial consumers than HNF, as estimated from measured bacterial clearance rates. Other crustaceans (copepods, Bosmina) were probably of minor importance as grazers of bacteria and nanoplankton. 3. HNF abundance varied from 550 ml^?1 to more than 30000 ml^?1. HNF appeared to be suppressed by daphnids and reached highest densities when copepods dominated the metazooplankton. The variation in HNF abundance was not reflected in the concentration of heterotrophic bacteria, which fluctuated rather irregularly between 5 and 20 ± 10⁶ ml^?1. Long filamentous bacteria which were probably resistant to protozoan grazing, however, appeared parallel to the development of HNF. These bacterial cells, although small in number, could comprise more than 30% of the total bacterial biomass.     

Seasonal dynamics of free and attached heterotrophic nanoflagellates in an oligomesotrophic lake

1. The seasonal development of heterotrophic nanoflagellates (HNF), bacteria, rotiferans and crustacean zooplankton was studied in the epilimnion of Lake Pavin, an oligomesotrophic lake in the Massif Central of France.
2. HNF abundance varied from 0.1 to 2.5 × 10³ mL^–1. Free-living HNF reached their highest density in spring when the copepod Acanthodiaptomus denticornis dominated the metazooplankton. They were present in low numbers when rotifers and cladocerans were numerous.
3. Attached HNF, consisting of bicoecids and choanoflagellates, were fixed to large diatoms and to the colonial cyanobacterium Anabaena flos-aquae . The abundance of attached HNF was significantly correlated to bacterial abundance, which fluctuated between 1.1 and 2.7 × 10⁶ mL^–1. Highest abundance of these epiphytic protists was recorded when free-living heterotrophic nanoflagellates declined.
4. The comparison of the dynamics of heterotrophic nanoflagellates, bacteria, and the impact of zooplankton grazing suggested that prey abundance, the presence of suitable attachment sites and limited competition from the free-living forms were the main factors controlling the development of the epiphytic flagellate protists. In contrast, the low abundance of free-living forms during the period of rotiferan and cladoceran development suggests the prevalence of a top-down control by predation of the metazoopankton.     

Changes in cell volume of bacteria and heterotrophic nanoflagellates in a hypereutrophic pond

Changes in cell volume of planktonic bacteria and heterotrophic nanoflagellates (HNF) were examined in a hypereutrophic pond from April to October, 1997. There were marked changes in the abundance of bacteria, HNF and ciliates and in protistan bacterivory during this period. The cell volume of free-living bacteria (0.121 ± 0.031 m³, mean ± SD) was large relative to that reported in the literature. The cell volumes of HNF was 71.1 ± 24.8 m³. Both cell volumes did not follow a seasonal trend. The dominant size class of bacteria was seasonally variable, whereas density of filamentous bacteria was relatively high between August and September. Biomass of filamentous bacteria accounted for up to 33.6% of total bacterial biomass. A correlation analysis for cell volume of bacteria and HNF, density of filamentous bacteria and some microbial variates was performed. The positive correlations detected (p<0.05) were between density of bacteria and cell volume of HNF, and between density of filamentous bacteria and cell volume of HNF.     

Patterns in the top-down versus bottom-up regulation of heterotrophic nanoflagellates in temperate lakes

The importance of resources versus that of predators in determiningthe abundance of organisms is modulated by several factors whichvary over time and space. Here, we evaluate the abundance ofheterotrophic nanoflagellates (HNF), the main predators of planktonicbacteria, in the plankton of 16 Quebec lakes as a function ofthe abundance of resources and zooplankton (predators). We analyzethe data at two different scales: among lakes varying in resourcesupply and within lakes. Resource factors (total phosphorus,chlorophyll, bacterial concentration) best explained the abundancesof HNF among lakes differing in resource availability. Whenthe effect of resource availability was removed, the biomassof cladocerans became an important determinant of HNF abundance,with abundance declining and the ratio of bacteria per flagellateincreasing, as the cladocerans increased. Within lakes, HNFabundance was not a direct function of resource concentration.Multiple regression models based on data for many lakes showedthat both bottom-up (food) and top-down (predation) variablespredicted HNF abundance quite well. An examination of the seasonalpattern among individual lakes showed each group of variablesdiffering in importance: bottom-up variables were more importantin spring and top-down variables in midsummer. An examinationof the effects of different assemblages of zooplankton on HNFshowed cladocerans to exert the highest negative impact on HNFand to be responsible for keeping low HNF numbers during mostof the summer with that probably affecting the pathways of energyflux in those lakes dominated by cladocerans versus those dominatedby other zooplankton. The absolute, as well as the relative,importance of the different biotic and abiotic factors examinedin predicting the abundance of HNF is a function of the scaleof the investigation. Among lakes varying greatly in resourcesupply, resources are found to better correlate with HNF abundance.When the analysis is performed at another scale, within lakes,the relative importance of resources and predation in determiningHNF abundances changes depending on the variability superimposedby other factors (seasonality and lake food web structure).     

Top‐down effects on pelagic heterotrophic nanoflagellates (HNF) in a large river (River Rhine): do losses to the benthos play a role?

1. The abundance, production and control of pelagic heterotrophic nanoflagellates (HNF) in the Lower River Rhine (Germany) were investigated. Field samples (live‐counting technique) were taken at least every 2 weeks at Cologne (km 685) over a period of 20 months. In addition, Lagrangian sampling was carried out 160 km downstream of Cologne (Kalkar–Grieth, km 845) over a period of 12 months. Potential HNF growth rates and loss rates caused by planktonic predators were estimated in the laboratory (size fractionation experiments) and compared with the changes in HNF‐density in a water parcel flowing downstream. 2. Mean abundance (±SD) ranged from 7 ± 6 to 4890 ± 560 individuals mL^–1 and was positively correlated with discharge. Heterotrophic nanoflagellates abundance increased up to 30‐fold during flood events, whereas there were only minor changes in the taxonomic composition. 3. HNF growth rate ranged from 0.16 ± 0.12 to 1.98 ± 0.10 day^–1. Between 0 and 95% (mean: 32%) of the gross production was lost to planktonic predators; a larger portion between 0 and 195% (mean: 64%) of the HNF gross production was lost by other means. 4. There may be an important role for benthic predators in the control of pelagic HNF. First, production of HNF was high and grazing losses to planktonic predators low at times when HNF abundance was low. Secondly, high in situ loss rates (not explicable by planktonic predators), which were positively related to temperature, indicate the importance of biotic interactions. Thirdly, the dependence of HNF abundance on discharge indicated a decrease grazing intensity with rising water levels (increase in water volume/colonised river bed ratio). 5. The impact of discharge on planktonic HNF mediated by the grazing impact of benthic predators was modelled, showing a good fit with the field data.     

Factors affecting the bacteria-heterotrophic nanoflagellate relationship in oligo-mesotrophic lakes

The coupling between bacteria and heterotrophic nanoflagellates(HNF) was examined in nine lakes of low productivity for evidenceof the effects of various metazooplankton (i.e. rotifers, cladoceransand copepods) on this relationship. We considered the size ofcladocerans and, in contrast to most previous across-systemstudies, the three strata of the water column (i.e. epilimnion,metalimnion and hypolimnion). Rotifers were numerically dominantin all lakes and accounted for 45–84% of total metazooplanktonabundance, while the abundance of large cladocerans was relativelylow, ranging from 0.066 to 15.2 ind. L^–1. The across-lakerelationship between bacteria and HNF was significant in thedeeper strata (meta- and hypolimnion) but not in the epilimnionand in the two groups of lakes separated on the basis of theiraverage number of large cladocerans (<5 and >5 ind. L^–1,respectively). The results confirmed the negative impacts oflarge cladocerans on HNF, but also showed that rotifers, probablythrough grazing on HNF, may be an important factor causing variationin the bacteria–HNF relationship in unproductive waters.Quadratic models best described the relationships between metazooplanktonand the ratio of bacteria to HNF. This ratio seemed to be aresult of complex interactions between several factors, includingthe zooplankton composition and abundance and the depth of thelake. Indeed, this ratio significantly decreased across lakes,with increase in depth. In addition, shallower lakes (having<5 large cladocerans L^–1 and fewer Polyarthra vulgaris)tended to have more bacteria and HNF and a higher ratio of bacteriato HNF than deeper lakes (which had >5 large cladoceransL^–1 and substantial proportions of P. vulgaris). We suggestthat the epilimnion, metalimnion and hypolimnion of lakes betaken into account when analysing the bacteria–HNF relationshipas well as the cascading effects of zooplankton on microbialcommunities.     

The effect of small zooplankton on the microbial loop and edible algae during a cyanobacterial bloom

SUMMARY 1. We studied the effect of the small crustacean zooplankton on heterotrophic micro-organisms and edible phytoplankton in a eutrophic lake during a cyanobacterial bloom.
2. Small (15 L) enclosures were filled with natural or screened (100 μm) lake water and incubated for 5 days in the lake. Screening removed crustacean zooplankton but the initial density of rotifers and phytoplankton remained the same in control and removal treatments. Changes in the abundance and biomass of bacteria, autotrophic picoplankton (APP), heterotrophic nanoflagellates (HNF) and ciliates were measured daily.
3. The crustacean zooplankton, dominated by the small cladoceran Chydorus sphaericus , did not affect cyanobacteria, the main phytoplankton group during the experiment.
4. The removal of the crustacean zooplankton induced a higher abundance of ciliates and reduced that of the HNF, indicating the importance of ciliates in controlling HNF in this system.     

Trophic relationships between planktonic bacteria,heterotrophic nanoflagellates and viruses in a mesoeutrophic reservoir

The abundance, biomass, and production (Р _В) of bacrerioplankton; the taxonomic composition, abundance, biomass of heterotrophic nanoflagellates (HNF) and the rate of consumption of bacteria by HNFs; and the abundance of virioplankton, frequency of visibly infected bacterial cells, virus-induced mortality of bacterioplankton, and viral production were estimated in the mesoeutrophic Rybinsk Reservoir. The rate of bacterial mortality due to viral lysis (7.8–34.1%, on average 17.2 ± 2.0% of daily Р _В) was lower than the consumption of bacteria by the HNF community (15.4–61.3%, on average 32.0 ± 4.2% of daily Р _В). While consuming bacteria, HNFs simultaneously absorbed a significant number of viruses residing on the surface and inside the bacterial cells.     

Microbial food web in a large shallow lake (Lake Balaton, Hungary)

Seasonal variations of phyto-, bacterio- and colourless flagellate plankton were followed across a year in the large shallow Lake Balaton (Hungary). Yearly average chlorophyll-a concentration was 11 µg 1^–1, while the corresponding values of bacterioplankton and heterotrophic nanoflagellate (HNF) plankton biomass (fresh weight) were 0.24 mg 1^–1 and 0.35 mg 1^–1, respectively. About half of planktonic primary production was channelled through bacterioplankton on the yearly basis. However, there was no significant correlation between phytoplankton biomass and bacterial abundance. Bacterial specific growth rates were in the range of 0.009 and 0.09 h^–1, and ended to follow the seasonal changes in water temperature. In some periods of the year, predator-prey relationships between the HNF and bacterial abundance were obvious. The estimated HNF grazing on bacteria varied between 3% and 227% of the daily bacterial production. On an annual basis, 87% of bacterial cell production was grazed by HNF plankton.     

Microbial communities in oligotrophic Lake Toya,Japan

 The vertical distributions of planktonic bacteria, chroococcoid cyanobacteria, and heterotrophic nanoflagellates (HNF) were examined in Lake Toya, an oligotrophic lake located in Hokkaido, the northern island of Japan, at monthly intervals from May 1993 to May 1994. The abundances of bacteria, cyanobacteria, and HNF during the study period ranged from 10⁴ to 10⁵,10² to 10⁴, 10 to 10² cells ml⁻¹, respectively. The range of bacterial abundances was among the lowest previously reported from other oligotrophic lakes. The vertical distributions of both bacteria and cyanobacteria were influenced by thermal stratification: they were homogeneous throughout the water column during the circulation period (January to April) and heterogeneous during the period of stratification (June to November). During the period of stratification, the cyanobacterial abundance decreased toward the surface in the euphotic zone while the frequency of diving cells (FDC) increased, suggesting that grazing pressure was high near the surface. This hypothesis was supported by the relatively high abundance of HNF at the surface and the negative correlation between HNF and cyanobacterial abundances in the euphotic zone (r = −0.503, n = 33, P < 0.05). On the other hand, multiple regression analysis revealed that 52% of the variation in bacterial abundance in the stratified period can be explained by chlorophyll a concentration, water temperature, and HNF abundance (df = 3, 45; F = 16.2; P < 0.01), suggesting that both substrate limitation and grazing loss by HNF were important factors controlling bacterial abundance in the lake. Received: June 21, 2002 / Accepted: October 16, 2002 Present address: 5-2-2-18-805 Kikusui-motomachi, Shiroishi, Sapporo 003-0825, Japan Present address: School of Environmental Science, University of Shiga Prefecture, 2500 Hassaka-cho, Hikone 522-8533, Japan Tel. +81-749-28-8307; Fax +81-749-28-8463 e-mail: ban@ses.usp.ac.jp Acknowledgments We thank Dr. H. Ueda for encouraging this study and Mr. Haruna and the members of the Plankton Laboratory, Hokkaido University, for their help in sampling. We also thank two anonymous reviewers for their critical comments. Correspondence to:S. Ban     

Microbial and classical food webs: A visit to a hypertrophic lake

Abstract: Plankton community structure and fluxes of carbon for bacteria (production and bacterivory) were investigated in the urban, hypertrophic Lake Rodó (Uruguay) using a short time interval for sampling (5–15 d) during one year. The lake sustains a high phytoplankton biomass (up to 335 μg l⁻¹ chlorophyll a ) always dominated by the filamentous cyanobacteria Planktothrix agardhii . The zooplankton community was numerically dominated by rotifers and ciliates; cladocerans were rare during most of the year. The rotifer abundance was very high (up to 10⁵ individual l⁻¹), the bacterivorous Anuraeopsis fissa being the most abundant species. Predation rates of heterotrophic nanoflagellates (HNF) on bacteria (range: 31–130 bacteria HNF⁻¹ h⁻¹) were higher than those reported in the literature for field studies. A carbon budget showed that HNF can consume on average 91 and 76% of the bacterial carbon production in summer and winter, respectively. Bacterial turnover times are the lowest reported until now from field conditions (5 to 42 h). Consequently, bacterial carbon production was extremely high (72 to 1071 μg C l⁻¹ d⁻¹). Bacterial production was positively correlated to bacterial abundance but the relationship was significantly improved by the inclusion of temperature (82% variability explained). My results support the general trend for increased bacterial production with increasing trophic status, and suggest a lower energy transfer efficiency to higher trophic levels in hypertrophic lakes due to the many trophic interactions involved.     

Flow cytometric detection and quantification of heterotrophic nanoflagellates in enriched seawater and cultures

A flow cytometric protocol to detect and enumerate heterotrophic nanoflagellates (HNF) in enriched waters is reported. At present, the cytometric protocols that allow accurate quantification of bacterioplankton cannot be used to quantify protozoa for the following reasons: i) the background produced by the bacterial acquisitions does not allow the discrimination of protozoa at low abundance, ii) since the final protozoan fluorescence is much higher than the bacterioplankton fluorescence (more than 35 fold) the protozoa acquisitions lie outside the range. With an increase in the fluorescence threshold and a reduction of the fluorescence detector voltage, low fluorescence particles (bacteria) are beneath the detection limits and only higher fluorescence particles (most of them heterotrophic nanoflagellates) are detected. The main limitation for the application of the cytometric protocol developed is that a ratio of bacteria/HNF below 1000 is needed. At higher ratios, the background of larger cells of bacterioplankton makes it difficult to discriminate protozoa. The proposed protocol has been validated by epifluorescence microscopy analyzing both a mixed community and two single species of HFN: Rhynchomonas nasuta and Jakoba libera. Taking into account the required bacteria/HNF ratio cited above, the results provide evidence that the flow cytometric protocol reported here is valid for counting mixed communities of HNF in enriched seawater and in experimental micro or mesocosms. In the case of single species of HNF previous knowledge of the biological characteristics of the protist and how they can affect the effectiveness of the flow cytometric count is necessary.     

Examining the relationship between bacteria and heterotrophic nanoflagellates in Funka Bay (Japan) using the size-fractionation method

The chemical and biological conditions, and the bacteria-heterotrophic nanoflagellate (HNF) relationship were investigated in the vicinity of Funka Bay, southwest of Hokkaido, Japan during early spring 1999. At the time of sampling, chlorophyll a concentration, bacteria, phycoerythrin rich-cyanobacteria, and HNF abundance were in the following ranges: 0.3–3.6 g l^–1, 2.5–5.6 × 10⁵ cells ml^–1, 0.6–1.2 × 10³ cells ml^–1, and 2.2–4.2 × 10³ cells ml^–1, respectively. Dissolved inorganic nitrogen, phosphate and silicate concentrations were in the ranges: 8.7–12.2 M, 0.9–2.0 M, and 21.6–25.5 M, respectively. Primary production ranged from 6.4 to 76.3 mg C m^–3 d^–1. Using water samples from regions of different productivity levels (in and outside bay), the bacteria - HNF relationship was uncoupled experimentally by the size-fractionation technique. Higher primary production (19.9 mg C m^–3 d^–1) in the bay supported higher bacterial growth rate (0.029 h^–1). However, outside the bay both primary production (6.4 mg C m^–3 d^–1) and bacterial growth rate (0.007 h^–1) were lower. The HNF growth rates and grazing rates were similar for both but by comparing both HNF grazing capacity and bacterial production, there was net decrease in bacterial abundance outside the bay and net increase inside the bay. The microbial parameters (rates and abundance) and the amount of carbon flow estimated through the phytoplankton – dissolved organic matter (DOM) – bacteria loop were different between the coastal station and the open ocean station. However HNF grazing and growth rates was similar for both stations.     

Prey selectivity of bacterivorous protists in different size fractions of reservoir water amended with nutrients

An experiment designed to examine food preferences of heterotrophic nanoflagellates (HNF) grazing on bacterioplankton was performed in the freshwater Rímov reservoir (Czech Republic). Water samples were size-fractionated to obtain < 5 microm filtrate containing bacteria and HNF. To manipulate resource availability, < 5 microm treatments were incubated in dialysis bags submerged in the barrels filled with the unfiltered reservoir water amended with either orthophosphate or glucose or combination of both. We employed rRNA-targeted probes to assess HNF prey preferences by analysing bacterial prey in HNF food vacuoles compared with available bacteria. Actinobacteria (the HGC69a probe) were avoided by HNF in all treatments. Cytophaga-Flavobacterium-Bacteroidetes bacteria (the CF319a probe) were positively selected mainly in treatments in which bacteria were heavily grazed, the < 5 microm treatments, but this trend was less pronounced towards the end of the study. The members of a small subcluster of Betaproteobacteria (the R-BT065 probe) were mostly positively selected. The nutrient amendments differentially affected bacterioplankton dynamics in almost all treatments, and together with the size fractionation, altered HNF overall bacterivory as well as prey selection. Analyses of bacterivores in unfiltered treatments allowed to detect the effect of different protists on shifts in HNF selectivity observed in < 5 microm compared with unfiltered treatments.     

Annual variation in the abundance and size of heterotrophic nanoflagellates on the SW coast of Finland, the Baltic Sea

Annual variation and vertical distribution in the abundanceand cell volume of heterotrophic nanoflagellates (HNF) was studiedon the SW coast of Finland, the Baltic Sea. HNF cell numbersand mean cell volume varied annually from 90 to 10⁴ cells ml^–1,and from 3 to 32 µm³, respectively, with maxima in earlysummer. The proportion of choanoflagellates in the HNF communitywas 0–23%. Statistical analysis revealed the verticaldifferences in HNF abundance to be insignificant, but verticaldifferences in the size structure of HNF communities were found,especially during thermal stratification. The majority (>80%)of HNF were small (maximum dimension 2–4 µm); theproportion of large (>7 µm) cells were only 2–4%of the HNF abundance. An empirical equation for the relationshipbetween HNF cell length and volume is presented, and the measurementof flagellate volume by epifluorescence microscopy is discussed.     

Trophic interactions among heterotrophic microplankton,nanoplankton, and bacteria in Lake Constance

A considerable portion of the pelagic energy flow in Lake Constance (FRG) is channelled through a highly dynamic microbial food web. In-situ experiments using the lake water dilution technique according to Landry & Hasset (1982) revealed that grazing by heterotrophic nanoflagellates (HNF) smaller than 10 µm is the major loss factor of bacterial production. An average flagellate ingests 10 to 100 bacteria per hour. Nano- and micro-ciliates have been identified as the main predators of HNF. If no other food is used between 3 and 40 HNF are consumed per ciliate and hour. Other protozoans and small metazoans such as rotifers are of minor importance in controlling HNF population dynamics.Clearance rates varied between 0.2 and 122.8 nl HNF^–1 h^–1 and between 0.2 and 53.6 µl ciliate^–1 h^–1, respectively.Ingestion and clearance rates measured for HNF and ciliates are in good agreement with results obtained by other investigators from different aquatic environments and from laboratory cultures. Both the abundance of all three major microheterotrophic categories — bacteria, HNF, and ciliates — and the grazing pressure within the microbial loop show pronounced seasonal variations.