Response of the Bacteriophage T4 Replisome to Noncoding Lesions and Regression of a Stalled Replication Fork

DNA is constantly damaged by endogenous and exogenous agents. The resulting DNA lesions have the potential to halt the progression of the replisome, possibly leading to replication fork collapse. Here, we examine the effect of a noncoding DNA lesion in either leading strand template or lagging strand template on the bacteriophage T4 replisome. A damaged base in the lagging strand template does not affect the progression of the replication fork. Instead, the stalled lagging strand polymerase recycles from the lesion and initiates the synthesis of a new Okazaki fragment upstream of the damaged base. In contrast, when the replisome encounters a blocking lesion in the leading strand template, the replication fork only travels approximately 1 kb beyond the point of the DNA lesion before complete replication fork collapse. The primosome and the lagging strand polymerase remain active during this period, and an Okazaki fragment is synthesized beyond the point of the leading strand lesion. There is no evidence for a new priming event on the leading strand template. Instead, the DNA structure that is produced by the stalled replication fork is a substrate for the DNA repair helicase UvsW. UvsW catalyzes the regression of a stalled replication fork into a “chicken-foot” structure that has been postulated to be an intermediate in an error-free lesion bypass pathway.     

Unwinding of the nascent lagging strand by Rep and PriA enables the direct restart of stalled replication forks

During origin-independent replisome assembly, the replication restart protein PriC prefers to load the replication fork helicase, DnaB, to stalled replication forks where there is a gap in the nascent leading strand. However, this activity can be obstructed if the 5'-end of the nascent lagging strand is near the template branch point. Here we provide biochemical evidence that the helicase activities of Rep and PriA function to unwind the nascent lagging strand DNA at such stalled replication forks. PriC then loads the replicative helicase, DnaB, onto the newly generated, single-stranded template for the purposes of replisome assembly and duplex unwinding ahead of the replication fork. Direct rescue of replication forks by the Rep-PriC and PriA-PriC pathways in this manner may contribute to genomic stability by avoiding the potential dangers of fork breakage inherent to recombination-dependent restart pathways.     

Stalled replication forks: Making ends meet for recognition and stabilization

In bacteria, PriA protein, a conserved DEXH‐type DNA helicase, plays a central role in replication restart at stalled replication forks. Its unique DNA‐binding property allows it to recognize and stabilize stalled forks and the structures derived from them. Cells must cope with fork stalls caused by various replication stresses to complete replication of the entire genome. Failure of the stalled fork stabilization process and eventual restart could lead to various forms of genomic instability. The low viability of priA null cells indicates a frequent occurrence of fork stall during normal growth that needs to be properly processed. PriA specifically recognizes the 3′‐terminus of the nascent leading strand or the invading strand in a displacement (D)‐loop by the three‐prime terminus binding pocket (TT‐pocket) present in its unique DNA binding domain. Elucidation of the structural basis for recognition of arrested forks by PriA should provide useful insight into how stalled forks are recognized in eukaryotes.     

Unwinding of forked DNA structures by UvrD

Many studies have demonstrated the need for processing of blocked replication forks to underpin genome duplication. UvrD helicase in Escherichia coli has been implicated in the processing of damaged replication forks, or the recombination intermediates formed from damaged forks. Here we show that UvrD can unwind forked DNA structures, in part due to the ability of UvrD to initiate unwinding from discontinuities within the phosphodiester backbone of DNA. UvrD does therefore have the capacity to target DNA intermediates of replication and recombination. Such an activity resulted in unwinding of what would be the parental duplex DNA ahead of either a stalled replication fork or a D-loop formed by recombination. However, UvrD had a substrate preference for fork structures having a nascent lagging strand at the branch point but no leading strand. Furthermore, at such structures the polarity of UvrD altered so that unwinding of the lagging strand predominated. This reaction is reminiscent of the PriC-Rep pathway of replication restart, suggesting that UvrD and Rep may have at least partially redundant functions.     

Structural analysis of DNA replication fork reversal by RecG

The stalling of DNA replication forks that occurs as a consequence of encountering DNA damage is a critical problem for cells. RecG protein is involved in the processing of stalled replication forks, and acts by reversing the fork past the damage to create a four-way junction that allows template switching and lesion bypass. We have determined the crystal structure of RecG bound to a DNA substrate that mimics a stalled replication fork. The structure not only reveals the elegant mechanism used by the protein to recognize junctions but has also trapped the protein in the initial stage of fork reversal. We propose a mechanism for how forks are processed by RecG to facilitate replication fork restart. In addition, this structure suggests that the mechanism and function of the two largest helicase superfamilies are distinct.     

Human Primpol1: a novel guardian of stalled replication forks

Huang and colleagues identify a human primase-polymerase that is required for stalled replication fork restart and the maintenance of genome integrity.EMBO reports (2013) 14 12, 1104–1112 doi:10.1038/embor.2013.159The successful duplication of genomic DNA during S phase is essential for the proper transmission of genetic information to the next generation of cells. Perturbation of normal DNA replication by extrinsic stimuli or intrinsic stress can result in stalled replication forks, ultimately leading to abnormal chromatin structures and activation of the DNA damage response. On formation of stalled replication forks, many DNA repair and recombination pathway proteins are recruited to resolve the stalled fork and resume proper DNA synthesis. Initiation of replication at sites of stalled forks differs from traditional replication and, therefore, requires specialized proteins to reactivate DNA synthesis. In this issue of EMBO reports, Wan et al [1] introduce human primase-polymerase 1 (hPrimpol1)/CCDC111, a novel factor that is essential for the restart of stalled replication forks. This article is the first, to our knowledge, to ascertain the function of human Primpol enzymes, which were originally identified as members of the archaeao-eukaryotic primase (AEP) family [2].Single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) forms at stalled replication forks because of uncoupling of the DNA helicase from the polymerase, and is coated by replication protein A (RPA) for stabilization and recruitment of proteins involved in DNA repair and restart of replication. To identify novel factors playing important roles in the resolution of stalled replication forks, Wan and colleagues [1] used mass spectrometry to identify RPA-binding partners. Among the proteins identified were those already known to be located at replication forks, including SMARCAL1/HARP, BLM and TIMELESS. In addition they found a novel interactor, the 560aa protein CCDC111. This protein interacts with the carboxyl terminus of RPA1 through its own C-terminal region, and localizes with RPA foci in cells after hydroxyurea or DNA damage induced by ionizing irradiation. Owing to the presence of AEP and zinc-ribbon-like domains at the amino-terminal and C-terminal regions, respectively [2], CCDC111 was predicted to have both primase and polymerase enzymatic activities, which was confirmed with in vitro assays, leading to the name hPrimpol1 for this unique enzyme.The most outstanding discovery in this article is that hPrimpol1 is required for the restart of DNA synthesis from a stalled replication fork (Fig 1). With use of a single DNA fibre assay, knock down of hPrimpol1 had no effect on normal replication-fork progression or the firing of new origins in the presence of replication stress. After removal of replication stress, however, the restart of stalled forks was significantly impaired. Furthermore, the authors observed that hPrimpol1 depletion enhanced the toxicity of replication stress to human cells. Together, these data suggest that hPrimpol1 is a novel guardian protein that ensures the proper re-initiation of DNA replication by control of the repriming and repolymerization of newly synthesized DNA.Open in a separate windowFigure 1The role of hPrimpol1 in stalled replication fork restart. (A) Under normal conditions, the replicative helicase unwinds parental DNA, generating ssDNA that is coated by RPA and serves as a template for leading and lagging strand synthesis. Aside from interacting with RPA bound to the short stretches of ssDNA, the role of hPrimpol1 in normal progression of replication forks is unknown. (B) Following repair of a stalled replication fork, (1) hPrimpol1 rapidly resumes DNA synthesis of long stretches of RPA-coated ssDNA located at the stalled fork site. Later, the leading-strand polymerase (2) or lagging-strand primase and polymerase (3) replace hPrimpol1 to complete replication of genomic DNA. RPA, replication protein A; ssDNA, single-stranded DNA.Eukaryotic DNA replication is initiated at specific sites, called origins, through the help of various proteins, including ORC, CDC6, CDT1 and the MCM helicase complex [3]. On unwinding of the parental duplexed DNA, lagging strand ssDNA is coated by the RPA complex and used as a template for newly synthesized daughter DNA. DNA primase, a type of RNA polymerase, catalyses short RNA primers on the RPA-coated ssDNA that facilitate further DNA synthesis by DNA polymerase. While the use of a short RNA primer is occasionally necessary to restart leading-strand replication, such as in the case of a stalled DNA polymerase, it is primarily utilized in lagging-strand synthesis for the continuous production of Okazaki fragments. The lagging-strand DNA polymerase must efficiently coordinate its action with DNA primase and other replication factors, including DNA helicase and RPA [4]. Cooperation between DNA polymerase and primase is disturbed after DNA damage, ultimately resulting in the collapse of stalled replication forks. Until now, it was believed that DNA primase and DNA polymerase performed separate and catalytically unique functions in replication-fork progression in human cells, but this report provides the first example, to our knowledge, of a single enzyme performing both primase and polymerase functions to restart DNA synthesis at stalled replication forks after DNA damage (Fig 1).… this report provides the first example of a single enzyme performing both primase and polymerase function to restart DNA synthesis at stalled replication forksA stalled replication fork, if not properly resolved, can be extremely detrimental to a cell, causing permanent cell-cycle arrest and, ultimately, death. Therefore, eukaryotic cells have developed many pathways for the identification, repair and restart of stalled forks [5]. RPA recognizes ssDNA at stalled forks and activates the intra-S-phase checkpoint pathway, which involves various signalling proteins, including ATR, ATRIP and CHK1 [6]. This checkpoint pathway halts cell-cycle progression until the stalled forks are properly repaired and restarted. Compared with the recognition and repair of stalled forks, the mechanism of fork restart is relatively elusive. Studies have, however, begun to shed light on this process. For instance, RPA-directed SMARCAL1 has been discovered to be important for restart of DNA replication in bacteria and humans [7]. Together with the identification of hPrimpol1, these findings have helped to expand the knowledge of the mechanism of restarting DNA replication. Furthermore, both reports raise many questions regarding the cooperative mechanism of hPrimpol1 and SMARCAL1 with RPA at stalled forks to ensure genomic stability and proper fork restart [7].First, these findings raise the question of why cells need the specialized hPrimpol1 to restart DNA replication at stalled forks rather than using the already present DNA primase and polymerase. One possibility is that other DNA polymerases are functionally inhibited due to the response of the cell to DNA damage. Although the cells are ready to restart replication, the impaired polymerases might require additional time to recover after DNA damage, necessitating the use of hPrimpol1. In support of this idea, we found that the p12 subunit of DNA polymerase δ is degraded by CRL4^CDT2 E3 ligase after ultraviolet damage [8]. As a result, alternative polymerases, such as hPrimpol1, could compensate for temporarily non-functioning traditional polymerases. A second explanation is that the polymerase and helicase uncoupling after stalling of a fork results in long stretches of ssDNA that are coated with RPA. To restart DNA synthesis, cells must quickly reprime and polymerize large stretches of ssDNA to prevent renewed fork collapse. By its constant interaction with RPA1, hPrimpol1 is present on the ssDNA and can rapidly synthesize the new strand of DNA after the recovery of stalled forks. Third, the authors found that the association of hPrimpol1 with RPA1 is independent of its functional AEP and zinc-ribbon-like domains and occurs in the absence of DNA damage. These results might indicate a role for hPrimpol1 in normal replication fork progression, but further work is necessary to determine whether that is true.The discovery of hPrimpol1 is also important in an evolutionary contextSeveral questions remain. First, what is the fidelity of the polymerase activity? Other specialized polymerases that act at DNA damage sites sometimes have the ability to misincorporate a nucleotide across from a site of damage, for example pol-eta and -zeta [9]. It will be interesting to know whether hPrimpol1 is a high-fidelity polymerase or an error-prone polymerase. Second, is the polymerase only brought into action after fork stalling? If hPrimpol1 is an error-prone polymerase, one could envision other types of DNA damage that can be bypassed by hPrimpol1. Third, is the primase selective for ribonucleotides, or can it also incorporate deoxynucleotides? The requirement of the same domain—AEP—for primase and polymerase activities raises the possibility that NTPs or dNTPs could be used for primase or polymerase activities.The discovery of hPrimpol1 is also important in an evolutionary context. In 2003, an enzyme with catalytic activities like that of hPrimpol1 was discovered in a thermophilic archeaon and in Gram-positive bacteria [10]. This protein had several catalytic activities in vitro, including ATPase, primase and polymerase. In contrast to these Primpol enzymes, those capable of primase and polymerase functions had not been found in higher eukaryotes, which suggested that evolutionary pressures forced a split of these dual-function enzymes. Huang et al''s report suggests, however, that human cells do in fact retain enzymes similar to Primpol. In summary, the role of hPrimpol1 at stalled forks broadens our knowledge of the restart of DNA replication in human cells after fork stalling, allowing for proper duplication of genomic DNA, and provides insight into the evolution of primases in eukaryotes.     

Maintaining replication fork integrity in UV-irradiated Escherichia coli cells

In dividing cells, the stalling of replication fork complexes by impediments to DNA unwinding or by template imperfections that block synthesis by the polymerase subunits is a serious threat to genomic integrity and cell viability. What happens to stalled forks depends on the nature of the offending obstacle. In UV-irradiated Escherichia coli cells DNA synthesis is delayed for a considerable period, during which forks undergo extensive processing before replication can resume. Thus, restart depends on factors needed to load the replicative helicase, indicating that the replisome may have dissociated. It also requires the RecFOR proteins, which are known to load RecA recombinase on single-stranded DNA, implying that template strands are exposed. To gain a further understanding of how UV irradiation affects replication and how replication resumes after a block, we used fluorescence microscopy and BrdU or radioisotope labelling to examine chromosome replication and cell cycle progression. Our studies confirm that RecFOR promote efficient reactivation of stalled forks and demonstrate that they are also needed for productive replication initiated at the origin, or triggered elsewhere by damage to the DNA. Although delayed, all modes of replication do recover in the absence of these proteins, but nascent DNA strands are degraded more extensively by RecJ exonuclease. However, these strands are also degraded in the presence of RecFOR when restart is blocked by other means, indicating that RecA loading is not sufficient to stabilise and protect the fork. This is consistent with the idea that RecA actively promotes restart. Thus, in contrast to eukaryotic cells, there may be no factor in bacterial cells acting specifically to stabilise stalled forks. Instead, nascent strands may be protected by the simple expedient of promoting restart. We also report that the efficiency of fork reactivation is not affected in polB mutants.     

UV stalled replication forks restart by re-priming in human fibroblasts

Restarting stalled replication forks is vital to avoid fatal replication errors. Previously, it was demonstrated that hydroxyurea-stalled replication forks rescue replication either by an active restart mechanism or by new origin firing. To our surprise, using the DNA fibre assay, we only detect a slightly reduced fork speed on a UV-damaged template during the first hour after UV exposure, and no evidence for persistent replication fork arrest. Interestingly, no evidence for persistent UV-induced fork stalling was observed even in translesion synthesis defective, Polη(mut) cells. In contrast, using an assay to measure DNA molecule elongation at the fork, we observe that continuous DNA elongation is severely blocked by UV irradiation, particularly in UV-damaged Polη(mut) cells. In conclusion, our data suggest that UV-blocked replication forks restart effectively through re-priming past the lesion, leaving only a small gap opposite the lesion. This allows continuation of replication on damaged DNA. If left unfilled, the gaps may collapse into DNA double-strand breaks that are repaired by a recombination pathway, similar to the fate of replication forks collapsed after hydroxyurea treatment.     

Mammalian RAD51 paralogs protect nascent DNA at stalled forks and mediate replication restart

Mammalian RAD51 paralogs are implicated in the repair of collapsed replication forks by homologous recombination. However, their physiological roles in replication fork maintenance prior to fork collapse remain obscure. Here, we report on the role of RAD51 paralogs in short-term replicative stress devoid of DSBs. We show that RAD51 paralogs localize to nascent DNA and common fragile sites upon replication fork stalling. Strikingly, RAD51 paralogs deficient cells exhibit elevated levels of 53BP1 nuclear bodies and increased DSB formation, the latter being attributed to extensive degradation of nascent DNA at stalled forks. RAD51C and XRCC3 promote the restart of stalled replication in an ATP hydrolysis dependent manner by disengaging RAD51 and other RAD51 paralogs from the halted forks. Notably, we find that Fanconi anemia (FA)-like disorder and breast and ovarian cancer patient derived mutations of RAD51C fails to protect replication fork, exhibit under-replicated genomic regions and elevated micro-nucleation. Taken together, RAD51 paralogs prevent degradation of stalled forks and promote the restart of halted replication to avoid replication fork collapse, thereby maintaining genomic integrity and suppressing tumorigenesis.     

PriB stimulates PriA helicase via an interaction with single-stranded DNA

The frequency with which replication forks break down in all organisms requires that specific mechanisms ensure completion of genome duplication. In Escherichia coli a major pathway for reloading of the replicative apparatus at sites of fork breakdown is dependent on PriA helicase. PriA acts in conjunction with PriB and DnaT to effect loading of the replicative helicase DnaB back onto the lagging strand template, either at stalled fork structures or at recombination intermediates. Here we showed that PriB stimulates PriA helicase, acting to increase the apparent processivity of PriA. This stimulation correlates with the ability of PriB to form a ternary complex with PriA and DNA structures containing single-stranded DNA, suggesting that the known single-stranded DNA binding function of PriB facilitates unwinding by PriA helicase. This enhanced apparent processivity of PriA might play an important role in generating single-stranded DNA at stalled replication forks upon which to load DnaB. However, stimulation of PriA by PriB is not DNA structure-specific, demonstrating that targeting of stalled forks and recombination intermediates during replication restart likely resides with PriA alone.     

Tracking of controlled Escherichia coli replication fork stalling and restart at repressor-bound DNA in vivo

We report an efficient, controllable, site-specific replication roadblock that blocks cell proliferation, but which can be rapidly and efficiently reversed, leading to recovery of viability. Escherichia coli replication forks of both polarities stalled in vivo within the first 500 bp of a 10 kb repressor-bound array of operator DNA-binding sites. Controlled release of repressor binding led to rapid restart of the blocked replication fork without the participation of homologous recombination. Cytological tracking of fork stalling and restart showed that the replisome-associated SSB protein remains associated with the blocked fork for extended periods and that duplication of the fluorescent foci associated with the blocked operator array occurs immediately after restart, thereby demonstrating a lack of sister cohesion in the region of the array. Roadblocks positioned near oriC or the dif site did not prevent replication and segregation of the rest of the chromosome.     

The disposition of nascent strands at stalled replication forks dictates the pathway of replisome loading during restart

Rescue of arrested and collapsed replication forks is essential for maintenance of genomic integrity. One system for origin of replication-independent loading of the DnaB replicative helicase and subsequent replisome reassembly requires the structure-specific recognition factor PriA and the assembly factors PriB and DnaT. Here, we provide biochemical evidence for an alternate system for DnaB loading that requires only PriC. Furthermore, the choice of which system is utilized during restart is dictated by the nature of the structure of the stalled replication fork. PriA-dependent reactions are most robust on fork structures with no gaps in the leading strand, such as is found at the junction of a D loop, while the PriC-dependent system preferentially utilizes fork structures with large gaps in the leading strand. These observations suggest that the type of initial damage on the DNA template and how the inactivated fork is processed ultimately influence the choice of enzymatic restart pathway.     

Chromatin assembly controls replication fork stability

During DNA replication, the advance of replication forks is tightly connected with chromatin assembly, a process that can be impaired by the partial depletion of histone H4 leading to recombinogenic DNA damage. Here, we show that the partial depletion of H4 is rapidly followed by the collapse of unperturbed and stalled replication forks, even though the S‐phase checkpoints remain functional. This collapse is characterized by a reduction in the amount of replication intermediates, but an increase in single Ys relative to bubbles, defects in the integrity of the replisome and an accumulation of DNA double‐strand breaks. This collapse is also associated with an accumulation of Rad52‐dependent X‐shaped molecules. Consistently, a Rad52‐dependent—although Rad51‐independent—mechanism is able to rescue these broken replication forks. Our findings reveal that correct nucleosome deposition is required for replication fork stability, and provide molecular evidence for homologous recombination as an efficient mechanism of replication fork restart.     

Cooperation of RAD51 and RAD54 in regression of a model replication fork

DNA lesions cause stalling of DNA replication forks, which can be lethal for the cell. Homologous recombination (HR) plays an important role in DNA lesion bypass. It is thought that Rad51, a key protein of HR, contributes to the DNA lesion bypass through its DNA strand invasion activity. Here, using model stalled replication forks we found that RAD51 and RAD54 by acting together can promote DNA lesion bypass in vitro through the 'template-strand switch' mechanism. This mechanism involves replication fork regression into a Holliday junction ('chicken foot structure'), DNA synthesis using the nascent lagging DNA strand as a template and fork restoration. Our results demonstrate that RAD54 can catalyze both regression and restoration of model replication forks through its branch migration activity, but shows strong bias toward fork restoration. We find that RAD51 modulates this reaction; by inhibiting fork restoration and stimulating fork regression it promotes accumulation of the chicken foot structure, which we show is essential for DNA lesion bypass by DNA polymerase in vitro. These results indicate that RAD51 in cooperation with RAD54 may have a new role in DNA lesion bypass that is distinct from DNA strand invasion.     

EEPD1 Rescues Stressed Replication Forks and Maintains Genome Stability by Promoting End Resection and Homologous Recombination Repair

Replication fork stalling and collapse is a major source of genome instability leading to neoplastic transformation or cell death. Such stressed replication forks can be conservatively repaired and restarted using homologous recombination (HR) or non-conservatively repaired using micro-homology mediated end joining (MMEJ). HR repair of stressed forks is initiated by 5’ end resection near the fork junction, which permits 3’ single strand invasion of a homologous template for fork restart. This 5’ end resection also prevents classical non-homologous end-joining (cNHEJ), a competing pathway for DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair. Unopposed NHEJ can cause genome instability during replication stress by abnormally fusing free double strand ends that occur as unstable replication fork repair intermediates. We show here that the previously uncharacterized Exonuclease/Endonuclease/Phosphatase Domain-1 (EEPD1) protein is required for initiating repair and restart of stalled forks. EEPD1 is recruited to stalled forks, enhances 5’ DNA end resection, and promotes restart of stalled forks. Interestingly, EEPD1 directs DSB repair away from cNHEJ, and also away from MMEJ, which requires limited end resection for initiation. EEPD1 is also required for proper ATR and CHK1 phosphorylation, and formation of gamma-H2AX, RAD51 and phospho-RPA32 foci. Consistent with a direct role in stalled replication fork cleavage, EEPD1 is a 5’ overhang nuclease in an obligate complex with the end resection nuclease Exo1 and BLM. EEPD1 depletion causes nuclear and cytogenetic defects, which are made worse by replication stress. Depleting 53BP1, which slows cNHEJ, fully rescues the nuclear and cytogenetic abnormalities seen with EEPD1 depletion. These data demonstrate that genome stability during replication stress is maintained by EEPD1, which initiates HR and inhibits cNHEJ and MMEJ.     

Situational repair of replication forks: roles of RecG and RecA proteins

Replication forks often stall or collapse when they encounter a DNA lesion. Fork regression is part of several major paths to the repair of stalled forks, allowing nonmutagenic bypass of the lesion. We have shown previously that Escherichia coli RecA protein can promote extensive regression of a forked DNA substrate that mimics a possible structure of a replication fork stalled at a leading strand lesion. Using electron microscopy and gel electrophoresis, we demonstrate that another protein, E. coli RecG helicase, promotes extensive fork regression in the same system. The RecG-catalyzed fork regression is very efficient and faster than the RecA-promoted reaction (up to 240 bp s(-1)), despite very limited processivity of the RecG protein. The reaction is dependent upon ATP hydrolysis and is stimulated by single-stranded binding protein. The RecA- and RecG-promoted reactions are not synergistic. In fact, RecG functions poorly under the conditions optimal for the RecA reaction, and vice versa. When both RecA and RecG proteins are incubated with the DNA substrate, high RecG concentrations inhibit the RecA protein-promoted fork regression. The very different reaction profiles may reflect a situational application of these proteins to the rescue of stalled replication forks in vivo.     

Bacteriophage T4 32 protein is required for helicase-dependent leading strand synthesis when the helicase is loaded by the T4 59 helicase-loading protein

In the bacteriophage T4 DNA replication system, T4 gene 59 protein binds preferentially to fork DNA and accelerates the loading of the T4 41 helicase. 59 protein also binds the T4 32 single-stranded DNA-binding protein that coats the lagging strand template. Here we explore the function of the strong affinity between the 32 and 59 proteins at the replication fork. We show that, in contrast to the 59 helicase loader, 32 protein does not bind forked DNA more tightly than linear DNA. 32 protein displays a strong binding polarity on fork DNA, binding with much higher affinity to the 5' single-stranded lagging strand template arm of a model fork, than to the 3' single-stranded leading strand arm. 59 protein promotes the binding of 32 protein on forks too short for cooperative binding by 32 protein. We show that 32 protein is required for helicase-dependent leading strand DNA synthesis when the helicase is loaded by 59 protein. However, 32 protein is not required for leading strand synthesis when helicase is loaded, less efficiently, without 59 protein. Leading strand synthesis by wild type T4 polymerase is strongly inhibited when 59 protein is present without 32 protein. Because 59 protein can load the helicase on forks without 32 protein, our results are best explained by a model in which 59 helicase loader at the fork prevents the coupling of the leading strand polymerase and the helicase, unless the position of 59 protein is shifted by its association with 32 protein.     

Cooperation of the N-terminal Helicase and C-terminal endonuclease activities of Archaeal Hef protein in processing stalled replication forks

Blockage of replication fork progression often occurs during DNA replication, and repairing and restarting stalled replication forks are essential events in all organisms for the maintenance of genome integrity. The repair system employs processing enzymes to restore the stalled fork. In Archaea Hef is a well conserved protein that specifically cleaves nicked, flapped, and fork-structured DNAs. This enzyme contains two distinct domains that are similar to the DEAH helicase family and XPF nuclease superfamily proteins. Analyses of truncated mutant proteins consisting of each domain revealed that the C-terminal nuclease domain independently recognized and incised fork-structured DNA. The N-terminal helicase domain also specifically unwound fork-structured DNA and Holliday junction DNA in the presence of ATP. Moreover, the endonuclease activity of the whole Hef protein was clearly stimulated by ATP hydrolysis catalyzed by the N-terminal domain. These enzymatic properties suggest that Hef efficiently resolves stalled replication forks by two steps, which are branch point transfer to the 5'-end of the nascent lagging strand by the N-terminal helicase followed by template strand incision for leading strand synthesis by the C-terminal endonuclease.     

Cleavage of model replication forks by fission yeast Mus81-Eme1 and budding yeast Mus81-Mms4

The blockage of replication forks can result in the disassembly of the replicative apparatus and reversal of the fork to form a DNA junction that must be processed in order for replication to restart and sister chromatids to segregate at mitosis. Fission yeast Mus81-Eme1 and budding yeast Mus81-Mms4 are endonucleases that have been implicated in the processing of aberrant DNA junctions formed at stalled replication forks. Here we have investigated the activity of purified Mus81-Eme1 and Mus81-Mms4 on substrates that resemble DNA junctions that are expected to form when a replication fork reverses. Both enzymes cleave Holliday junctions and substrates that resemble normal replication forks poorly or not at all. However, forks where the equivalents of either both the leading and lagging strands or just the lagging strand are juxtaposed at the junction point, or where either the leading or lagging strand has been unwound to produce a fork with a single-stranded tail, are cleaved well. Cleavage sites map predominantly between 3 and 6 bp 5' of the junction point. For most substrates the leading strand template is cleaved. The sole exception is a fork with a 5' single-stranded tail, which is cleaved in the lagging strand template.