Demethylation of methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins in Escherichia coli induced by the repellents glycerol and ethylene glycol.

The addition of glycerol or ethylene glycol caused not only severe tumbling but also a drastic decrease in the methylation level of methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs) in Escherichia coli. Experiments with various mutants having defects in their MCPs showed that the demethylation occurred in all three kinds of MCPs, MCPI, II, and III. The addition of an attractant to the glycerol- or ethylene glycol-treated cells resulted in a distinct increase in the methylation level of the relevant MCP, indicating that glycerol and ethylene glycol do not directly damage the methylation-demethylation system in the cell. The time courses of adaptation and MCP demethylation upon addition of these repellents were consistent with each other. Furthermore, both the response time and the extent of MCP demethylation were increased in parallel with increasing concentrations of glycerol or ethylene glycol. These results indicate that the adaptation to these repellents is performed by the demethylation of MCPs. Thus, glycerol and ethylene glycol are novel repellents, which utilize not just one but all three kinds of MCPs for both information processing and adaptation.     

Repellents for Escherichia coli operate neither by changing membrane fluidity nor by being sensed by periplasmic receptors during chemotaxis

A long-standing question in bacterial chemotaxis is whether repellents are sensed by receptors or whether they change a general membrane property such as the membrane fluidity and this change, in turn, is sensed by the chemotaxis system. This study addressed this question. The effects of common repellents on the membrane fluidity of Escherichia coli were measured by the fluorescence polarization of the probe 1,6-diphenyl-1,3,5-hexatriene in liposomes made of lipids extracted from the bacteria and in membrane vesicles. Glycerol, indole, and L-leucine had no significant effect on the membrane fluidity. NiSO4 decreased the membrane fluidity but only at concentrations much higher than those which elicit a repellent response in intact bacteria. This indicated that these repellents are not sensed by modulating the membrane fluidity. Aliphatic alcohols, on the other hand, fluidized the membrane, but the concentrations that elicited a repellent response were not equally effective in fluidizing the membrane. The response of intact bacteria to alcohols was monitored in various chemotaxis mutants and found to be missing in mutants lacking all the four methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs) or the cytoplasmic che gene products. The presence of any single MCP was sufficient for the expression of a repellent response. It is concluded (i) that the repellent response to aliphatic alcohols can be mediated by any MCP and (ii) that although an increase in membrane fluidity may take part in a repellent response, it is not the only mechanism by which aliphatic alcohols, or at least some of them, are effective as repellents. To determine whether any of the E. coli repellents are sensed by periplasmic receptors, the effects of repellents from various classes on periplasm-void cells were examined. The responses to all the repellents tested (sodium benzoate, indole, L-leucine, and NiSO4) were retained in these cells. In a control experiment, the response of the attractant maltose, whose receptor is periplasmic, was lost. This indicates that these repellents are not sensed by periplasmic receptors. In view of this finding and the involvement of the MCPs in repellent sensing, it is proposed that the MCPs themselves are low-affinity receptors for the repellents.     

Genetic and biochemical properties of Escherichia coli mutants with defects in serine chemotaxis

In Escherichia coli, taxis to certain chemoeffectors is mediated through an intrinsic membrane protein called methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein I (MCP I), which is the product of the tsr gene. Mutants were selected that are defective in taxis toward all MCP I-mediated attractants (alpha-aminoisobutyrate, L-alanine, glycine, and L-serine) but are normal to MCP I-mediated repellents and to chemoeffectors mediated by other MCPs. The mutants could be divided into two classes based on their ability to respond to various concentrations of L-serine. Two MCP I-mediated L-serine systems appear to function in the wild type: one of high and one of lower affinity. The mutations responsible for the serine taxis defects map at about 99 min on the E. coli chromosome and are not complemented by episomes carrying mutations in the tsr gene; this suggests that they are defective in tsr function. Low concentrations of L-[14C]serine specifically bound to wild-type membranes with a Km of 5 microM; in contrast, there was greatly decreased binding to vesicles prepared from the new mutants or from the tsr mutant AW518. Binding of labeled serine to wild-type vesicles was inhibited by MCP I-mediated attractants, but not by MCP II-mediated attractants. The data suggest that MCP I may function as the L-serine chemoreceptor in E. coli.     

Influence of attractants and repellents on methyl group turnover on methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins of Bacillus subtilis and role of CheW.

The ability of attractants and repellents to affect the turnover of methyl groups on the methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs) was examined for Bacillus subtilis. Attractants were found to cause an increase in the turnover of methyl groups esterified to the MCPs, while repellents caused a decrease. These reactions do not require CheW. However, a cheW null mutant exhibits enhanced turnover in unstimulated cells. Assuming that the turnover of methyl groups on the MCPs reflects a change in the activity of CheA, these results suggest that the activation of CheA via chemoeffector binding at the receptor does not require CheW.     

Functional interaction between information processing pathways in Escherichia coli and the nature of Δ-H+ (redox)-sensing

Glucose taxis and O₂-taxis in Escherichia coli signal to flagella via a pathway that includes PTS^glc and adenylate cyclase. Information from a number of attractants and repellents is focused at the level of methy-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs) and information is passed to flagella by a separate pathway. Mutants defective in adenylate cyclase (Δcya) had a residual taxis to glucose that was eliminated by preincubating the cells with MCP attractants, or by depleting the -CH₃ donor. A methyltransferase mutant had a decreased sensitivity to MCP repellents and this response was completely blocked by preincubating the cells with glucose. Likewise, the response of cells, depleted for -CH₃, towards repellents, was blocked if bacteria carried a pts mutation. It is concluded that PTS and MCP pathways exchange information. In cya cells, O₂ taxis was restored in the presence of maltose, an MCPII attractat. It is suggested that MCPII is an additional protonmotive force (pmf) sensor.     

Chemosensory and thermosensory excitation in adaptation-deficient mutants of Escherichia coli

Methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein-methyltransferase-deficient mutants, cheR mutants, of Escherichia coli showed a tumble response to repellents only at low temperatures, and the resultant tumbling lasted unless the condition was changed. The swimming pattern of the repellent-treated cells was different at different temperatures, indicating that the absolute temperature is a determinant of the tumbling frequency of those cells. The tumbling of those cells was also suppressed by the addition of attractants. Under a suitable repellent concentration, the tumbling frequency of the cells was found to be simply determined by the ligand occupancy of chemoreceptors for many attractants. In a methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein-methylesterase-deficient mutant, a cheB deletion mutant, the tumbling frequency was also determined by receptor occupancy of some attractants. These results indicate that in the adaptation-deficient mutants, sensory signals are produced in proportion to the amount of ligand-bound or of thermally altered receptors and transmitted to the flagellar motors without any modification. Thus, it is concluded that the adaptation system, namely, the methylation-demethylation system of methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins, is not concerned with the step of chemosensory or thermosensory excitation. A simple model is proposed to explain how the swimming pattern of the adaptation-deficient mutants is determined.     

Differential localization of membrane receptor chemotaxis proteins in the Caulobacter predivisional cell

The methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs) are membrane receptors that initiate signal transduction to the flagellar rotor upon ligand binding. The synthesis of these proteins occurs only in the Caulobacter crescentus predivisional cell coincident with the biosynthesis of the polar flagellum. Both the flagellum and the MCPs are partitioned to only one daughter cell, the swarmer cell, upon division. We report the results of experiments designed to determine the distribution of these MCPs within swarmer cells and predivisional cells. Flagellated and non-flagellated vesicles were prepared from these cells by immunoaffinity chromatography and the level of MCPs that had been labeled either in vivo or in vitro with methyl-3H was determined. Small membrane vesicles from swarmer cells contained [methyl-3H]MCPs both in the flagellated and non-flagellated vesicles, which indicates that the region immediately surrounding the flagellum, as well as the rest of the surface of the swarmer cell, contains [methyl-3H]MCP. Thus, the MCPs are not specifically localized to the immediate vicinity of the flagellar rotor. The distribution of MCPs was examined in flagellated and non-flagellated vesicles isolated from predivisional cells. The analysis of small predivisional vesicles showed that the MCP content is higher in the flagellated vesicles, and analysis of large flagellated vesicles showed that the MCPs are positioned preferentially in the swarmer cell portion of the predivisional cell. This positional bias of MCPs within predivisional cells could reflect either a large compartment or membrane domain within the incipient swarmer cell, or a gradient of MCPs, with the highest concentration in the vicinity of the flagellum.     

Large increases in attractant concentration disrupt the polar localization of bacterial chemoreceptors

In bacterial chemotaxis, the chemoreceptors [methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs)] transduce chemotactic signals through the two-component histidine kinase CheA. At low but not high attractant concentrations, chemotactic signals must be amplified. The MCPs are organized into a polar lattice, and this organization has been proposed to be critical for signal amplification. Although evidence in support of this model has emerged, an understanding of how signals are amplified and modulated is lacking. We probed the role of MCP localization under conditions wherein signal amplification must be inhibited. We tested whether a large increase in attractant concentration (a change that should alter receptor occupancy from c. 0% to > 95%) would elicit changes in the chemoreceptor localization. We treated Escherichia coli or Bacillus subtilis with a high level of attractant, exposed cells to the cross-linking agent paraformaldehyde and visualized chemoreceptor location with an anti-MCP antibody. A marked increase in the percentage of cells displaying a diffuse staining pattern was obtained. In contrast, no increase in diffuse MCP staining is observed when cells are treated with a repellent or a low concentration of attractant. For B. subtilis mutants that do not undergo chemotaxis, the addition of a high concentration of attractant has no effect on MCP localization. Our data suggest that interactions between chemoreceptors are decreased when signal amplification is unnecessary.     

Localization of components of the chemotaxis machinery of Escherichia coli using fluorescent protein fusions

We prepared fusions of yellow fluorescent protein [the YFP variant of green fluorescent protein (GFP)] with the cytoplasmic chemotaxis proteins CheY, CheZ and CheA and the flagellar motor protein FliM, and studied their localization in wild-type and mutant cells of Escherichia coli. All but the CheA fusions were functional. The cytoplasmic proteins CheY, CheZ and CheA tended to cluster at the cell poles in a manner similar to that observed earlier for methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs), but only if MCPs were present. Co-localization of CheY and CheZ with MCPs was CheA dependent, and co-localization of CheA with MCPs was CheW dependent, as expected. Co-localization with MCPs was confirmed by immunofluorescence using an anti-MCP primary antibody. The motor protein FliM appeared as discrete spots on the sides of the cell. These were seen in wild-type cells and in a fliN mutant, but not in flhC or fliG mutants. Co-localization with flagellar structures was confirmed by immunofluorescence using an antihook primary antibody. Surprisingly, we did not observe co-localization of CheY with motors, even under conditions in which cells tumbled.     

Adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis: CheB-dependent modification permits additional methylations of sensory transducer proteins

Sensory transduction in E. coli consists of two phases, excitation and adaptation, both of which involve the methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs). These molecules relay transmembrane signals and are reversibly methylated during adaptation of E. coli to environmental stimuli. Each MCP contains multiple sites of methylation, and we identified six of these sites in MCPI. Recently, a second covalent modification of MCPs has been identified, which is not methylation. This modification, designated CheB-dependent modification, is stimulated by repellents and causes a net increase in the negative charge of MCPI and MCPII by one or two charges. We demonstrate that one CheB modification occurs on the methyl-accepting methionine-and lysine-containing tryptic peptide in MCPI and MCPII, and the second CheB modification is on an arginine-containing tryptic peptide. The CheB modification allows three additional methyl groups to be incorporated into the methyl-accepting methionine-lysine peptide, while not actually creating all of these methylation sites. The two CheB modifications occur sequentially. A possible mechanism by which CheB modification permits additional methylations and the role of CheB modification in bacterial chemotaxis are discussed.     

Chemotaxis of Escherichia coli to pyrimidines: a new role for the signal transducer tap

Escherichia coli exhibits chemotactic responses to sugars, amino acids, and dipeptides, and the responses are mediated by methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs). Using capillary assays, we demonstrated that Escherichia coli RP437 is attracted to the pyrimidines thymine and uracil and the response was constitutively expressed under all tested growth conditions. All MCP mutants lacking the MCP Tap protein showed no response to pyrimidines, suggesting that Tap, which is known to mediate dipeptide chemotaxis, is required for pyrimidine chemotaxis. In order to confirm the role of Tap in pyrimidine chemotaxis, we constructed chimeric chemoreceptors (Tapsr and Tsrap), in which the periplasmic and cytoplasmic domains of Tap and Tsr were switched. When Tapsr and Tsrap were individually expressed in an E. coli strain lacking all four native MCPs, Tapsr mediated chemotaxis toward pyrimidines and dipeptides, but Tsrap did not complement the chemotaxis defect. The addition of the C-terminal 19 amino acids from Tsr to the C terminus of Tsrap resulted in a functional chemoreceptor that mediated chemotaxis to serine but not pyrimidines or dipeptides. These results indicate that the periplasmic domain of Tap is responsible for detecting pyrimidines and the Tsr signaling domain confers on Tapsr the ability to mediate efficient chemotaxis. A mutant lacking dipeptide binding protein (DBP) was wild type for pyrimidine taxis, indicating that DBP, which is the primary chemoreceptor for dipeptides, is not responsible for detecting pyrimidines. It is not yet known whether Tap detects pyrimidines directly or via an additional chemoreceptor protein.     

Characterization of Escherichia coli chemotaxis receptor mutants with null phenotypes

Hydroxylamine mutagenesis was used to alter the tar gene that encodes the transmembrane Tar protein required for chemotaxis. Mutants defective in chemotaxis were selected, and the mutation was characterized by DNA sequencing. Two classes of mutations were found: nonsense and missense. The nonsense mutations were distributed throughout the gene, while the missense mutations were found to cluster in a region that includes 185 amino acids at the C-terminal end of the Tar protein. Partial characterization of mutant phenotypes suggested that some are completely defective in signaling while responding to attractants and repellents by differential methylation. Other mutants are undermethylated and constantly tumble, while yet another class of mutants is overmethylated and biased toward constant swimming with little or no tumbling. These mutants will be useful in experiments designed to understand the mechanism of chemotaxis.     

Analysis of the Frz signal transduction system of Myxococcus xanthus shows the importance of the conserved C-terminal region of the cytoplasmic chemoreceptor FrzCD in sensing signals

The Frz chemosensory system controls directed motility in Myxococcus xanthus by regulating cellular reversal frequency. M. xanthus requires the Frz system for vegetative swarming on rich media and for cellular aggregation during fruiting body formation on starvation media. The Frz signal transduction pathway is formed by proteins that share homology with chemotaxis proteins from enteric bacteria, which are encoded in the frzA-F putative operon and the divergently transcribed frzZ gene. FrzCD, the Frz system chemoreceptor, contains a conserved C-terminal module present in methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs); but, in contrast to most MCPs, FrzCD is localized in the cytoplasm and the N-terminal region of FrzCD does not contain transmembrane or sensing domains, or even a linker region. Previous work on the Frz system was limited by the unavailability of deletion strains. To understand better how the Frz system functions, we generated a series of in-frame deletions in each of the frz genes as well as regions encoding the N-terminal portion of FrzCD. Analysis of mutants containing these deletions showed that FrzCD (MCP), FrzA (CheW) and FrzE (CheA-CheY) control vegetative swarming, responses to repellents and directed movement during development, thus constituting the core components of the Frz pathway. FrzB (CheW), FrzF (CheR), FrzG (CheB) and FrzZ (CheY-CheY) are required for some but not all responses. Furthermore, deletion of approximately 25 amino acids from either end of the conserved C-terminal region of FrzCD results in a constitutive signalling state of FrzCD, which induces hyper-reversals with no net cell movement. Surprisingly, deletion of the N-terminal region of FrzCD shows only minor defects in swarming. Thus, signal input to the Frz system must be sensed by the conserved C-terminal module of FrzCD and not the usual N-terminal region. These results indicate an alternative mechanism for signal sensing with this cytoplasmic MCP.     

Tyrosine 106 of CheY plays an important role in chemotaxis signal transduction in Escherichia coli.

CheY is the response regulator in the signal transduction pathway of bacterial chemotaxis. Position 106 of CheY is occupied by a conserved aromatic residue (tyrosine or phenylalanine) in the response regulator superfamily. A number of substitutions at position 106 have been made and characterized by both behavioral and biochemical studies. On the basis of the behavioral studies, the phenotypes of the mutants at position 106 can be divided into three categories: (i) hyperactivity, with a tyrosine-to-tryptophan mutation (Y106W) causing increased tumble signaling but impairing chemotaxis; (ii) low-level activity, with a tyrosine-to-phenylalanine change (Y106F) resulting in decreased tumble signaling and chemotaxis; and (iii) no activity, with substitutions such as Y106L, Y106I, Y106V, Y106G, and Y106C resulting in no chemotaxis and a smooth-swimming phenotype. All three types of mutants can be phosphorylated by CheA-phosphate in vitro to a level similar to that of wild-type CheY. Autodephosphorylation rates are similar for all categories of mutants. All mutant proteins displayed less than twofold increased rates compared with wild-type CheY. Binding of the mutant proteins to FliM was similar to that of the wild-type CheY in the CheY-FliM binding assays. The combined results from in vivo behavioral and in vitro biochemical studies suggest that the diverse phenotypes of the Y106 mutants are not due to a variation in phosphorylation or dephosphorylation ability nor in affinity for the switch. With reference to the structures of wild-type CheY and the T871 CheY mutant, our results suggest that rearrangements of the orientation of the tyrosine side chain at position 106 are involved in the signal transduction of CheY. These data also suggest that the binding of phosphoryl-CheY to the flagellar motor is a necessary, but not sufficient, event for signal transduction.     

Evolutionary conservation of methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein location in Bacteria and Archaea

The methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs) are concentrated at the cell poles in an evolutionarily diverse panel of bacteria and an archeon. In elongated cells, the MCPs are located both at the poles and at regions along the length of the cells. Together, these results suggest that MCP location is evolutionarily conserved.     

The methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins of Escherichia coli. Identification of the multiple methylation sites on methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein I

The methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs) are integral membrane proteins that undergo reversible methylation during adaptation of bacterial cells to environmental attractants and repellents. The numerous methylated forms of each MCP are seen as a pattern of multiple bands on polyacrylamide gels. We have characterized the methylation sites in MCPI by analyzing methyl-accepting tryptic peptides. At least two different tryptic peptides accept methyl esters; one methyl-accepting peptide contains methionine and lysine and may be methylated a maximum of four times. The second methyl-accepting tryptic peptide contains arginine and may be methylated twice. Base-catalyzed demethylations of tryptic peptides and analysis of the charge differences between the different methylated forms of MCPI show that MCPI molecules may be methylated a total of six times. The two methyl esters on the methyl-accepting arginine peptide appear to be preferentially methylated in most of the forms of MCPI in attractant-stimulated cells. The ability to acquire six methylations on MCPI allows the bacterial cells to adapt to a broad range of attractant and repellent concentrations.     

CheC and CheD interact to regulate methylation of Bacillus subtilis methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins

In this study, we have demonstrated that two unique proteins in Bacillus subtilis chemotaxis, CheC and CheD, interact. We have shown this interaction both by using the yeast two-hybrid system and by precipitation of in vitro translated products using glutathione-S-transferase fusions and glutathione agarose beads. We have also shown that CheC inhibits B. subtilis CheR-mediated methylation of B. subtilis methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs) but not of Escherichia coli MCPs. It was previously reported that cheC mutants tend to swim smoothly and do not adapt to addition of attractant; cheD mutants have very poorly methylated MCPs and are very tumbiy, similar to cheA mutants. We hypothesize that CheC exerts its effect on MCP methylation in B. subtilis by controlling the binding of CheD to the MCPs. In absence of CheD, the MCPs are poor substrates for CheR and appear to tie up, rather than activate, CheA. The regulation of CheD by CheC may be part of a unique adaptation system for chemotaxis in B. subtilis, whereby high levels of CheY-P brought about by attractant addition would allow CheC to interact with CheD and consequently leave the MCPs, reducing CheA activity and hence the levels of CheY-P.     

Two mechanisms of chemotaxis inParamecium

Summary Paramecia show chemotaxis, that is, they accumulate in or disperse from the vicinity of chemicals. This study examines both the avoiding reactions (abrupt random changes of swimming direction) and velocities of normal and mutant paramecia in attractants and repellents and shows that the animals accumulate or disperse either by changing the frequency of avoiding reactions or by changing swimming velocity. Mutations or conditions that eliminate avoiding reactions abolish the chemotaxis response to chemicals that cause accumulation or dispersal by modulation of frequency of avoiding reactions but not the response to chemicals that cause chemotaxis by modulation of velocity.The current knowledge of the bioelectric control of the swimming behavior inParamecium and observations of mutants defective in bioelectric control and in chemotaxis are used to develop a hypothesis for membrane potential control of chemotaxis: attractants that require the avoiding reaction slightly hyperpolarize the membrane; repellents that require the avoiding reaction slightly depolarize the membrane; repellents that cause chemitaxis by modulation of velocity strongly hyperpolarize the membrane.I am grateful to D. Kusher and P. Foletta for their technical assistance, to C. Kung and E. Orias for support and discussion of this work, to H. Machemer and M. Levandowsky for stimulating discussions, and to B. Diehn for suggestion of the modified assay. This work was supported in part by Public Health Service Grant F32 NSO5587 to JVH and NSF GB-3164X and PHS GM-19406 to C. Kung.     

Effect of cryoprotectants on the viability and function of unfrozen human polymorphonuclear cells

High concentrations of membrane permeable cryoprotectants are necessary to protect human polymorphonuclear leukocytes from osmotic stress injury during freezing, but there are reports that some cryoprotectants are chemically toxic. Cells were exposed to various concentrations of glycerol, dimethyl sulfoxide, or ethylene glycol for 5 min to 2 hr at 37, 22 or 0 degree C, adding or removing the cryoprotectant either slowly or rapidly. Assays included cell number recovery, membrane integrity, phagocytosis, microbicidal ability, and chemotaxis. We conclude that (1) 1 and 2 M concentrations generally are not toxic if they are added and removed slowly at 22 degrees C; (2) addition and removal of glycerol at 0 degree C was injurious even at 1 M; (3) slow addition and removal allowed better recovery than rapid addition or removal; (4) salt concentration in cryoprotectant solutions should be adjusted to isotonic on the basis of moles per liter of solution, rather than moles per kilogram of water; (5) the toxicity reported by other investigators can be largely explained by osmotic stress or dilution shock rather than chemical toxicity; and (6) ethylene glycol is the easiest cryoprotectant to add to and remove from these cells.