广西靖西县壮族民间对植物的命名

采用民族植物学方法,对广西靖西县常见植物进行了调查,完成了103种当地植物的民族植物学编目.通过分析这些植物的命名规律,结果发现:靖西县壮族民间对植物的命名采用了“双名”法,植物名称的前面部分包含了植物的形态型或用途类型,而后面的部分则包含了植物的形态特征、颜色、生长环境、性状和用途等方面.本文还对靖西县壮族民间植物命名与双名法以及其他民族命名进行了比较,探讨了其相似之处和不同点.从对植物的命名和发音等方面来看,壮族和傣族两个民族具有语言上的相似性.     

傣族的植物认知：命名－含义与分类

通过所收集的1175种(品种)植物的1390个傣名,并对生活型外的1691个含义进行分析、统计、归纳,阐明了傣族对植物的认知。他们用“宏哦宾”,即“从地上长出来的,有生命的东西”对“植物”这个抽象而综合词汇进行定义,与现代科学“从地上长出的任何东西”的“植物”定义异曲同工,这是世界上很多其它民族所没有的。他们把植物的生活型和经济类型作为“属”名,把植物的形态特征、经济用途、分布生态和故事传说等有关含义作为“种”名,在对1691个植物名字含义的统计中,它们分别占了60％、30％、8％和2％,充分体现了傣族对植物“见什么像什么就叫什么”的植物命名方法。它类似于现代植物分类学对植物命名的林奈氏“双名法”。基于傣族对植物的认知和植物傣名结构,可以建立起“植物界”、栽培植物和野生植物的两个“科”、生活型和经济类型的约20个“属”,以及具有“双名”的3000多个“种”和1000多个“品种”的5个结构层次的民间植物分类系统。     

濒危植物海南龙血树种子休眠机理及其生态学意义

通过对中国西双版纳与泰国都有分布和栽培的641种植物的傣、泰土著名字相似性比较,发现这两个民族具有基本相同的民间植物命名的“双名法”。西双版纳傣族与泰国的兰纳地区、北—东北部和其它地区泰族的植物土著名相同、相似的分别占0.69、0.57和0.37,主要包括药用植物在内的经济植物和与南传上座部佛教文化密切相关的植物。其主要成因包括他们的语言文字、宗教信仰、生活习俗等的傣、泰历史渊源及其所具有的传统文化密切程度相关。其中,兰纳地区地处泰国北部,它不仅邻近西双版纳,而且在历史上,它们曾经同属于“兰纳王国”,两地的边界曾是“犬牙交错”,成为“曼比勐农”（兄弟之邦）。这样,使包括土著名字在内的佛教植物、野生植物和栽培植物等的交流比泰国其它地区更加密切,相似性便最高。西双版纳傣族和兰纳泰族被视为尚存的标准“Tai”人区。因此,该研究对于中国Dai、泰国Thai、缅甸Siam和老挝Laos等国家民族的科学文化交流及其植物资源的利用和保护等具有重要的意义。 关键词： 民族植物学研究, 中国西双版纳傣族与泰国泰族, 相同植物的民间命名方法, 相似的植物土著名字, 相似的历史渊源成因, 科学与文化交流的意义     

民间植物分类系统与区域性物种多样性快速评估——以西双版纳傣族为例

生物多样性的快速流失 ,使传统分类工作在热带物种多样性评估中显出不足 ,而民间分类系统在区域性物种多样性快速评估中的作用已经引起人们的重视。前人对西双版纳傣族民间植物命名和分类系统已做过研究 ,该文在此基础上 ,探讨能否将这种知识用于区域性物种多样性快速评估。利用生物多样性快速编目、样方调查及民族植物学中民间访谈的方法 ,考察了三个傣族村寨原住民的植物识别能力。结果表明 ,傣族原住民的植物识别程度与其年龄呈显著正相关 ,中年以后识别能力趋于稳定 ,识别率高达 91 %以上。通过与长期在西双版纳地区工作的野外植物分类学家相比较 ,我们发现傣族原住民的植物识别率不低于分类学家 ,且所需时间比分类学家少。作者认为 ,民间植物分类系统可以用于局部地区的物种多样性快速评估。     

西双版纳傣族“龙山”的生态学意义

傣族“龙山”是西双版纳地区傣族的民族植物文化中的一例。其概念是“神居住的地方”,在这个地方的动植物都是神的家园里的生灵,是神的伴侣,是不能砍伐、狩猎和破坏的。人     

简议我国古代植物分类和命名

在参阅大量古籍文献的基础上,对我国古代植物的分类和命名进行了探讨。我国很早就用功能属性分类法和自然属性分类法对植物进行分类,有些类群的划分与国际上科学分类法的观点非常相似;运用植物的取象名素创立的“类部“和”种部”的植物命名方法类似于国际上植物命名的双名法。对我国古代植物分类学与国外分类学的异同,以及我国古代植物分类学发展不足的原因也作了分析。     

中国西双版纳傣族与泰国泰族民间植物命名方法与土著名字的相似性探讨

通过对中国西双版纳与泰国都有分布和栽培的641种植物的傣、泰土著名字相似性比较,发现这两个民族具有基本相同的民间植物命名的"双名法"。西双版纳傣族与泰国的兰纳地区、北—东北部和其它地区泰族的植物土著名相同、相似的分别占0.69、0.57和0.37,主要包括药用植物在内的经济植物和与南传上座部佛教文化密切相关的植物。其主要成因包括他们的语言文字、宗教信仰、生活习俗等的傣、泰历史渊源及其所具有的传统文化密切程度相关。其中,兰纳地区地处泰国北部,它不仅邻近西双版纳,而且在历史上,它们曾经同属于"兰纳王国",两地的边界曾是"犬牙交错",成为"曼比勐农"(兄弟之邦)。这样,使包括土著名字在内的佛教植物、野生植物和栽培植物等的交流比泰国其它地区更加密切,相似性便最高。西双版纳傣族和兰纳泰族被视为尚存的标准"Tai"人区。因此,该研究对于中国Dai、泰国Thai、缅甸Siam和老挝Laos等国家民族的科学文化交流及其植物资源的利用和保护等具有重要的意义。     

我国少数民族传统民居建筑中的植物利用

运用民族植物学的方法,对我国少数民族传统民居建筑使用的植物进行调查和分析.该文简要介绍了33个少数民族聚居区的自然环境条件和植被多样性;统计得到90种民间用于建筑材料的植物,报道了其使用部位、使用方法及使用民族,其中以傣族利用植物资源最为丰富;探讨了影响不同少数民族民居建筑植物选择的影响因素,包括自然条件、民族文化、社...     

德宏傣族巧用植物叶

生活在我国云南省德宏傣族景颇族自治州的傣族村民,对当地随处可见摘取方便的几种植物叶的巧用,既体现了当地的民俗和地域特点,又表现出傣族群众的聪明才智,令旅游观光者耳目一新。 巧用山枇杷果叶 桑科小乔木山枇杷果又称鸡嗉子果(Ficus semicordata),当地俗称“酸杷”,傣语称“麻政。这种植物长20—25厘米、宽12—15厘米的椭圆形叶的上面粗糙,下面有褐黄色硬毛,手感似砂纸。据此,当地群众主要将山枇杷果叶用于以下三个方面。     

傣族地区芭蕉类植物的民族植物学研究

从民族植物学的视角来看,傣族人民和芭蕉类植物之间发生着密切的互动,傣族人民认识和利用芭蕉类植物,芭蕉类植物丰富傣族人民的生活和文化内涵。在漫长的生活实践中,傣家人积累了关于芭蕉类植物丰富的地方性知识,形成了独具特色的"芭蕉文化"。在傣族社会中,芭蕉类植物是饱腹的食物、治病的药方、寄托信仰的载体、追溯历史的根据,成为傣族文化的一种载体和象征符号。在民族植物学的视野下,傣族"芭蕉文化"的形成是与生态环境密切相关的。     

Linnaean sources and concepts of orchids

Background

Linnaeus developed a robust system for naming plants and a useful, if mechanical, system for classifying them. His binomial nomenclature proved the catalyst for the rapid development of our knowledge of orchids, with his work on the family dating back to 1737 in the first edition of his Genera Plantarum. His first work devoted to orchids, indeed the first monograph of the family, was published in 1740 and formed the basis for his account in Species Plantarum, published in 1753, in which he gave a binomial name to each species. Given the overwhelming number of orchids, he included surprisingly few – only 62 mostly European species – in Species Plantarum, his seminal work on the plants of the world. This reflects the European origin of modern botany and the concentration of extra-European exploration on other matters, such as conquest, gold and useful plants. Nevertheless, the scope of Linnaeus'' work is broad, including plants from as far afield as India, Japan, China and the Philippines to the east, and eastern Canada, the West Indies and northern South America to the west. In his later publications he described and named a further 45 orchids, mostly from Europe, South Africa and the tropical Americas.

Scope

The philosophical basis of Linnaeus'' work on orchids is discussed and his contribution to our knowledge of the family assessed. His generic and species concepts are considered in the light of current systematic ideas, but his adoption of binomial nomenclature for all plants is his lasting legacy.Key words: Classification, Linnaeus, nomenclature, Orchidaceae, orchids     

The family of Deg/HtrA proteases in plants

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The Deg/HtrA family of ATP-independent serine endopeptidases is present in nearly all organisms from bacteria to human and vascular plants. In recent years, multiple deg/htrA protease genes were identified in various plant genomes. During genome annotations most proteases were named according to the order of discovery, hence the same names were sometimes given to different types of Deg/HtrA enzymes in different plant species. This can easily lead to false inference of individual protease functions based solely on a shared name. Therefore, the existing names and classification of these proteolytic enzymes does not meet our current needs and a phylogeny-based standardized nomenclature is required. RESULTS: Using phylogenetic and domain arrangement analysis, we improved the nomenclature of the Deg/HtrA protease family, standardized protease names based on their well-established nomenclature in Arabidopsis thaliana, and clarified the evolutionary relationship between orthologous enzymes from various photosynthetic organisms across several divergent systematic groups, including dicots, a monocot, a moss and a green alga. Furthermore, we identified a "core set" of eight proteases shared by all organisms examined here that might provide all the proteolytic potential of Deg/HtrA proteases necessary for a hypothetical plant cell. CONCLUSIONS: In our proposed nomenclature, the evolutionarily closest orthologs have the same protease name, simplifying scientific communication when comparing different plant species and allowing for more reliable inference of protease functions. Further, we proposed that the high number of Deg/HtrA proteases in plants is mainly due to gene duplications unique to the respective organism.     

《续南方草木状》初释

<正> 《续南方草木状》的作者江藩是清代经史学家。江苏甘泉人,字子屏,号郑堂。又称炳烛老人。为监生。生于1761年,即清高宗,乾隆26年;卒于1831年,即清宣宗,道光11年,终年71岁。少年时拜和惠栋、余莦客、江声为师。对古代经学和史学颇有研究,著有《国朝汉学师承记》八卷、《宋学渊源记》三卷、《国朝经师经义目录》一卷;晚年并著有《炳烛室杂文》,《续南方草木状》就是其中一文。     

Classification of apocynaceae s.l. according to a new approach combining Linnaean and phylogenetic taxonomy

A new approach to a nomenclatural system, including elements from both Linnaean and phylogenetic nomenclature, is proposed. It is compatible with the existing Linnaean system, including "standard names" corresponding to principal and secondary ranks, and uses a variant of the definitions from the Phylocode system. A new infrafamilial classification, using this nomenclatural approach, of the Apocynaceae s.l. (i.e., including the Asclepiadaceae) based mainly on analyses of rbcL and ndhF data is discussed. Twenty-one tribes and four rankless taxa are defined.     

The aldo-keto reductase (AKR) superfamily: an update

The aldo-keto reductases (AKRs) are one of three enzyme superfamilies encompassing a range of oxidoreductases. Members of the AKR superfamily are monomeric (α/β)₈-barrel proteins, about 320 amino acids in length, which bind NAD(P)(H) to metabolize an array of substrates. AKRs have been identified in vertebrates, invertebrates, plants, protozoa, fungi, eubacteria, and archaebacteria, implying that this is an ancient superfamily of enzymes. Earlier, in an attempt to clarify the confusion caused by multiple names for particular AKRs, we proposed a systematic and expandable nomenclature system to assign consistent designations to unique members of the AKR superfamily. Since then, the number of characterized AKRs has expanded to 105 proteins in 12 families. In addition, molecular cloning and genome sequencing projects have identified 125 potential AKR genes, many of which have no assigned function. The nomenclature system for the AKR superfamily is accepted by the Human Genome Project. Using the earlier described nomenclature system, we now provide an updated listing of AKRs and potential superfamily members. Information is also available at http://www.med.upenn.edu/akr.     

浅评当今植物系统学中争论的三个问题——并系类群、谱系法规和系统发育种概念

一般来讲,进化学派承认分支学派对系统学的研究作出了有意义的贡献,如应用分支分析方法重建系统发育,应用共有衍征确定分类群之间的分支关系以及应用外类群方法来判断性状的极性等,都对系统学的方法有所改进。但分支学派的致命缺点是拒绝接受并系类群。我们属于进化学派,认为并系类群是可以接受的。例如,根据分子资料分析,Zabelia属可以包括于Abelia属内。Zabelia属不但在花粉上和Abelia属不同,可能由于它占有了新的生态位,获得了新的特征,如叶柄基部膨大两两联合,并宿存以保护腋芽。有理由认为它们应独立成属,并不由于Zabelia属从Abelia属分出而使后者成为一个并系类群而把它们合并。分支学派的一些学者认为生物名称作为交流的工具和生物信息储存系统应有明晰的、唯一的和稳定的特性。但具等级的林奈命名系统并不具有这些特性来命名分支和种。最后,PhyloCode被提出。PhyloCode对分支的命名方法有3种,即分支结点定义、分支基干定义和衍征定义。我们认为林奈命名系统作为传媒系统在生物学界的应用已近250年,若要废弃它而采用PhyloCode,必然会在命名方面引起一片混乱。但我们并不是说PhyloCode的拥护者所提出的建议一无是处,我们建议他们宜继续进行研究。由于应用生物学种概念于植物界产生了许多问题,因此多为植物系统学家所抛弃。分支学派的兴起,推动了系统发育种概念的提出。该概念基于3个特征,即自征、区别特征和基本排它,因此分别命名为自征种概念、特征种概念和谱系种概念。事实上,目前大多数植物系统学家仍然应用着形态–地理学种概念,但我们在划分种时,必须有尽可能多的资料,特别是要将传粉、繁育系统、分子系统学资料和形态学资料结合起来。     

Paraphyletic group,PhyloCode and phylogenetic species—the current debate and a preliminary commentary

In this essay, three currently hotly debated issues in biological systematics, i.e., the paraphyletic group, the PhyloCode, and the phylogenetic species concept, have been briefly reviewed. (1) It is widely acknowledged that cladistics has made some positive contributions to the study of systematics. In particular, the employment of outgroup analysis for assessing character polarities, the application of synapomorphies to the inference of relationships between taxa, and the use of cladistic methods for reconstructing phylogeny, have all greatly facilitated the improvement of systematic approaches. A fatal flaw in cladistics is its refusal to accept paraphyletic groups. Frankly, we are adherents and practitioners of phyletics, and hence consider paraphyletic groups to be acceptable. For example, an AFLP analysis has shown that Zabelia (Caprifoliaceae) can be included in Abelia, but the members in Zabelia differ from those in Abelia not only in pollen morphology, but also in having persistent petioles dilated and connate at base, thus enclosing axillary buds, characters of adaptive significance obtained possibly when Zabelia members entered a new ecological niche, so we consider that they are better treated as two independent genera, though indeed such a treatment makes Abelia paraphyletic. (2) Some cladists pointed out that as the tool for communication and the system for information storage and retrieval, biological nomenclature is required to be unambiguous, unique and stable. They criticise the Linnaean rank-based system of nomenclature for failing to satisfy such requirements for the naming of clades and species. To address this problem, the PhyloCode is proposed in recent years, in which three definitions for clade naming are given, i.e., the node-based, the stem-based, and the apomorphy-based. We are of the opinion that since the Linnaean binominal system of botanical nomenclature has existed for nearly 250 years, the rejection of this system and the adoption of the PhyloCode would create a state of chaos in botanical nomenclature. This does not mean that there exist no merits in the proposals made by the PhyloCode supporters. We suggest that further studies should be conducted for its practical application. (3) It has been well known that there are many problems with the application of the biological species concept in plants, and thus at the present time the majority of plant systematists actually seldom use this concept in their practical work. The rapid development of cladistic approach has motivated the proposal of the phylogenetic species concept. This species concept is established based on three criteria, i.e., the autamorphy, the diagnosability and the basal exclusivity, hence the autamorphy species concept, the diagnosability species concept, and the genealogical concept are created respectively. Nevertheless, the morpho-geographical species concept is still predominantly adopted in plant systematics. When using this species concept, however, we should also take into account the data from other sources, particularly those from pollination biology, breeding system and molecular systematics.     

Industrial exploitation of renewable resources: from ethanol production to bioproducts development

Plants, which are one of major groups of life forms, are constituted of an amazing number of molecules such as sugars, proteins, phenolic compounds etc. These molecules display multiple and complementary properties involved in various compartments of plants (structure, storage, biological activity etc.). The first uses of plants in industry were for food and feed, paper manufacturing or combustion. In the coming decades, these renewable biological materials will be the basis of a new concept: the "biorefiner" i.e. the chemical conversion of the whole plant to various products and uses. This concept, born in the 90ies, is analogous to today's petroleum refinery, which produces multiple fuels and derivative products from petroleum. Agriculture generates lots of co-products which were most often wasted. The rational use of these wasted products, which can be considered as valuable renewable materials, is now economically interesting and will contribute to the reduction of greenhouse has emissions by partially substituting for fossil fuels. Such substructures from biological waste products and transforming them into biofuels and new industrial products named "bioproducts". These compounds, such as bioplastics or biosurfactants, can replace equivalent petroleum derivatives. Towards that goal, lots of filamentous fungi, growing on a broad range of vegetable species, are able to produce enzymes adapted to the modification of these type of substrates. The best example, at least the more industrially developed to date, is the second generation biofuel technology using cellulose as a raw material. The process includes an enzymatic hydrolysis step which requires cellulases secreted from Trichoderma fungal species. This industrial development of a renewable energy will contribute to the diversification of energy sources used to transport and to the development of green chemistry which will partially substitute petrochemicals.     

Constraints in naming parts of the Tree of Life

There are now overlapping codes of nomenclature that govern some of the same names of biological taxa. The International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN) uses the non-evolutionary concept of a "type species" to fix the names of animal taxa to particular ranks in the nomenclatural hierarchy. The PhyloCode, in contrast, uses phylogenetic definitions for supraspecific taxa at any hierarchical level within the Tree of Life (without associating the names to particular ranks), but does not deal with the names of species. Thus, biologists who develop classifications of animals need to use both systems of nomenclature, or else operate without formal rules for the names of some taxa (either species or many monophyletic groups). In addition, the ICZN does not permit the unique naming of many taxa that are considered to be between the ranks of genus and species. Hillis and Wilcox [Hillis, D.M., Wilcox, T.P., 2005. Phylogeny of the New World true frogs (Rana). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 34, 299-314] provided recommendations for the classification of New World true frogs that utilized the ICZN to provide names for species, and the PhyloCode to provide names for supraspecific taxa. Nonetheless, they created new taxon names that followed both sets of rules, to avoid conflicting classifications. They also recommended that established names for both species and clades be used whenever possible, to stabilize the names of both species and clades under either set of rules, and to avoid conflicting nomenclatures. Dubois [Dubois, A., 2006. Naming taxa from cladograms: a cautionary tale. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 42, 317-330] objected to these principles, and argued that the names provided by Hillis and Wilcox [Hillis, D.M., Wilcox, T.P., 2005. Phylogeny of the New World true frogs (Rana). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 34, 299-314] are unavailable under the ICZN, and that the two nomenclatural systems are incompatible. Here, I argue that he is incorrect in these assertions, and present arguments for retaining the established names of New World true frogs, which are largely compatible under both sets of nomenclatural rules.