Selectional and mutational scope of peptides sequestering the Jun-Fos coiled-coil domain

The activator protein-1 (AP-1) complex plays a crucial role in numerous pathways, and its ability to induce tumorigenesis is well documented. Thus, AP-1 represents an interesting therapeutic target. We selected peptides from phage display and compared their ability to disrupt the cFos/cJun interaction to a previously described in vivo protein-fragment complementation assay (PCA). A cJun-based library was screened to enrich for peptides that disrupt the AP-1 complex by binding to the cFos coiled-coil domain. Interestingly, phage display identified one helix, JunW_Ph1 [phage-selected winning peptide (clone 1) targeting cFos], which differs in only 2 out of 10 randomized positions to JunW (PCA-selected winning peptide targeting cFos). Phage-selected peptides revealed higher affinity to cFos than wild-type cJun, harboring a T_m of 53 °C compared to 16 °C for cFos/cJun or 44 °C for cFos/JunW. In PCA growth assays in the presence of cJun as competitor, phage-selected JunW_Ph1 conferred shorter generation times than JunW. Bacterial growth was barely detectable, using JunW_Ph1 as a competitor for the wild-type cJun/cFos interaction, indicating efficient cFos removal from the dimeric wild-type complex. Importantly, all inhibitory peptides were able to interfere with DNA binding as demonstrated in gel shift assays. The selected sequences have consequently improved our ‘bZIP coiled-coil interaction prediction algorithm’ in distinguishing interacting from noninteracting coiled-coil sequences. Predicting and manipulating protein interaction will accelerate the systems biology field, and generated peptides will be valuable tools for analytical and biomedical applications.     

Rexinoid-induced expression of IGFBP-6 requires RARbeta-dependent permissive cooperation of retinoid receptors and AP-1

The synthetic rexinoid bexarotene (Targretin, LGD1069) inhibits the formation of both estrogen receptor-negative and estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer in preclinical models and controls the expression of growth-regulatory biomarkers, such as IGFBP-6 (insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 6), RARbeta, or cyclin D1. In this study, we identified a classical retinoic acid-responsive element in the first intron in the IGFBP-6 gene adjacent to a consensus AP-1 binding site, both elements essential for rexinoid-induced expression of IGFBP-6. In chromatin binding experiments, bexarotene increased the occupancy of the identified enhancer element by RXRalpha, RARbeta, cJun, cFos, and p300. In normal mammary epithelial cells and T47D breast cancer cells, small interfering RNA-mediated knockdown of all RXR isoforms or RARbeta, but not RARalpha or RARgamma alone, blocked the induction of IGFBP-6 by bexarotene. Simultaneous knockdown of RARalpha and RARgamma abrogated both the induction of RARbeta and the up-regulation and secretion of IGFBP-6. The suppression of either RARbeta or cJun by small interfering RNA blocked the recruitment of RXRalpha and cJun to the enhancer. These results demonstrate a novel cooperative interaction between retinoid receptors and AP-1 orchestrated by RARbeta and highlight a novel mechanism by which RARbeta can mediate the cancer-preventive effects of rexinoids.     

转录因子AP-2及其在癌症中的作用

本文综述了关于AP-2基因家族的最近期研究进展。AP-2是一个分子量为52-kDa的转录因子,有其独特的蛋白质分子结构,其N端是富含脯氨酸和谷氨酸的转录激活域,C端的helix-span-helix结构可以形成二聚体并与特异的DNA序列结合。AP-2家族都能以同源或异源二聚体的方式与一段保守序列5’-GCCNNNGGC-3’结合。AP-2α是最早被鉴定和研究的家族成员,很多研究表明AP-2α是一个抑癌基因。     

Magnesium is required for specific DNA binding of the CREB B-ZIP domain

We have examined binding of the CREB B-ZIP protein domain to double-stranded DNA containing a consensus CRE sequence (5′-TGACGTCA-3′), the related PAR, C/EBP and AP-1 sequences and the unrelated SP1 sequence. DNA binding was assayed in the presence or absence of MgCl₂ and/or KCl using two methods: circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy and electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA). The CD assay allows us to measure equilibrium binding in solution. Thermal denaturation in 150 mM KCl indicates that the CREB B-ZIP domain binds all the DNA sequences, with highest affinity for the CRE site, followed by the PAR (5′-TAACGTTA-3′), C/EBP (5′-TTGCGCAA-3′) and AP-1 (5′-TGAGTCA-3′) sites. The addition of 10 mM MgCl₂ diminished DNA binding to the CRE and PAR DNA sequences and abolished binding to the C/EBP and AP-1 DNA sequences, resulting in more sequence-specific DNA binding. Using ‘standard’ EMSA conditions (0.25× TBE), CREB bound all the DNA sequences examined. The CREB–CRE complex had an apparent K_d of ~300 pM, PAR of ~1 nM, C/EBP and AP-1 of ~3 nM and SP1 of ~30 nM. The addition of 10 mM MgCl₂ to the polyacrylamide gel dramatically altered sequence-specific DNA binding. CREB binding affinity for CRE DNA decreased 3-fold, but binding to the other DNA sequences decreased >1000-fold. In the EMSA, addition of 150 mM KCl to the gels had an effect similar to MgCl₂. The magnesium concentration needed to prevent non-specific electrostatic interactions between CREB and DNA in solution is in the physiological range and thus changes in magnesium concentration may be a cellular signal that regulates gene expression.     

DNA binding activities of three murine Jun proteins: stimulation by Fos

Three members of the Jun/AP-1 family have been identified in mouse cDNA libraries: c-Jun, Jun-B, and Jun-D. We have compared the DNA binding properties of the Jun proteins by using in vitro translation products in gel retardation assays. Each protein was able to bind to the consensus AP-1 site (TGACTCA) and, with lower affinity, to related sequences, including the cyclic AMP response element TGACGTCA. The relative binding to the oligonucleotides tested was similar for the different proteins. The Jun proteins formed homodimers and heterodimers with other members of the family, and they were bound to the AP-1 site as dimers. When Fos translation product was present, DNA binding by Jun increased markedly, and the DNA complex contained Fos. The C-terminal homology region of Jun was sufficient for DNA binding, dimer formation, and interaction with Fos. Our general conclusion is that c-Jun, Jun-B, and Jun-D are similar in their DNA binding properties and in their interaction with Fos. If there are functional differences between them, they are likely to involve other activities of the Jun proteins.