Segmental specialization of neuronal connectivity in the leech

1. Every segmental ganglion of the leech Hirudo medicinalis contains two serotonergic Retzius cells. However, Retzius cells in the two segmental ganglia associated with reproductive function are morphologically distinct from Retzius cells elsewhere. This suggested that these Retzius cells might be physiologically distinct as well. 2. The degree of electrical coupling between Retzius cells distinguishes the reproductive Retzius cells; all Retzius cells are coupled in a non-rectifying manner, but reproductive Retzius cells are less strongly coupled. 3. Retzius cells in standard ganglia depolarize following swim motor pattern initiation or mechanosensory stimulation while Retzius cells in reproductive ganglia either do not respond or hyperpolarize. 4. In standard Retzius cells the depolarizing response caused by pressure mechanosensory neurons has fixed latency and one-to-one correspondence between the mechanosensory neuron action potentials and Retzius cell EPSPs. However, the latency is longer than for most known monosynaptic connections in the leech. 5. Raising the concentration of divalent cations in the bathing solution to increase thresholds abolishes the mechanosensory neuron-evoked EPSP in standard Retzius cells. This suggests that generation of action potentials in an interneuron is required for production of the EPSP, and therefore that the pathway from mechanosensory neuron to Retzius cell is polysynaptic. 6. P cells in reproductive segments have opposite effects on reproductive Retzius cells and standard Retzius cells in adjacent ganglia. Thus the difference in the pathway from P to Retzius is not localized specifically in the P cell, but elsewhere in the pathway, possibly in the type of receptor expressed by the Retzius cells.     

Convergence of mechanosensory inputs onto neuromodulatory serotonergic neurons in the leech

By the frequency-dependent release of serotonin, Retzius neurons in the leech modulate diverse behavioral responses of the animal. However, little is known about how their firing pattern is produced. Here we have analyzed the effects of mechanical stimulation of the skin and intracellular stimulation of mechanosensory neurons on the electrical activity of Retzius neurons. We recorded the electrical activity of neurons in ganglia attached to their corresponding skin segment by segmental nerve roots, or in isolated ganglia. Mechanosensory stimulation of the skin induced excitatory synaptic potentials (EPSPs) and action potentials in both Retzius neurons in a ganglion. The frequency and duration of responses depended on the strength and duration of the skin stimulation. Retzius cells responded after T and P cells, but before N cells, and their sustained responses correlated with the activity of P cells. Trains of five impulses at 10 Hz in every individual T, P, or N cell in isolated ganglia produced EPSPs and action potentials in Retzius neurons. Responses to T cell stimulation appeared after the first impulse. In contrast, the responses to P or N cell stimulation appeared after two or more presynaptic impulses and facilitated afterward. The polysynaptic nature of all the synaptic inputs was shown by blocking them with a high calcium/magnesium external solution. The rise time distribution of EPSPs produced by the different mechanosensory neurons suggested that several interneurons participate in this pathway. Our results suggest that sensory stimulation provides a mechanism for regulating serotonin-mediated modulation in the leech.     

Differential action of tetrodotoxin on identified leech neurons

1. In leech segmental ganglia, the maximum rate of depolarization of action potentials was found to depend largely on Na in the Retzius (R) cell, the mechanosensory P, N and T cells and an identifiable neuron of unknown function, the X cell. 2. Tetrodotoxin (TTX) 15 100 mumol/l had little or no effect on R and X cells. In contrast, membrane excitation in N, P and T cells was depressed in dose- and use-dependent fashion. 3. The data imply the existence of two kinds of Na channels in normal, fully differentiated leech neurons. Correlation of such differences should lead to a better understanding of how particular neurons perform different functions.     

Initiation of swimming activity by trigger neurons in the leech subesophageal ganglion

In papers I and II of this series, we described two pairs of interneurons, Tr1 and Tr2, in the leech subesophageal ganglion which can trigger swimming activity in the isolated central nervous system (CNS). In this paper, we describe sensory inputs to these trigger neurons from previously identified mechanosensory neurons. We found that: Weak mechanical stimulation (stroking) of a body wall flap attached to a segmental ganglion in an otherwise isolated CNS excites the contralateral Tr1 slightly. Strong mechanical stimulation (pinching) of a mid-body wall flap evokes a burst of impulses in the contralateral Tr1. For both means of stimulation the effects on the ipsilateral Tr1 and on the Tr2 cell pair were much weaker. Stroking a body wall flap attached to the head ganglion (supra- and subesophageal ganglia) in an otherwise isolated CNS excites both Tr1s and both Tr2s, although the effect is weaker for the Tr2s. Pinching strongly excites both trigger neurons bilaterally. Pressure and nociceptive mechanosensory neurons (P and N cells) in the subesophageal ganglion and the first segmental ganglion appear to make direct excitatory synapses with the contralateral Tr1 and Tr2. Mechanosensory interactions with the ipsilateral trigger neurons appear to be indirect. Functional inactivation of Tr1 by hyperpolarization does not prevent swim initiation either by weak mechanical stimulation of a body-wall flap or by intracellular stimulation of P cells.2+ We conclude that the trigger neurons, Tr1 and Tr2, provide an excitatory pathway by which mechanosensory stimulation can initiate leech swimming activity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effects of death of a single neuron on the functional organization of the neuronal ensemble in the leech

The reaction of leech nervous system after elimination of individual mechanosensory neuron by intracellular Pronase injection were studied. In the motor neurons connected with killed cells at 14-90th days after the operation there were the changes of the resting membrane potential and amplitude of postsynaptic potentials developed by the stimulation of mechanosensory neuron. It is suggested that the leech nervous system serves as the dynamic formation depending on changes of neuronal ensemble structure.     

Serotonin is released from isolated leech ganglia by potassium-induced depolarization.

1. The quantities of serotonin that are released from isolated leech ganglia in vitro were measured with the sensitive neurochemical techniques of HPLC-EC. 2. Segmental ganglia were exposed to elevated concentrations of potassium that depolarize leech serotonin-containing neurons by approximately 35 mV per decade. 3. Each segmental ganglion released on average 0.20 pmol of serotonin during 10 min of incubation in a solution containing 64 mM K+. 4. The rate of serotonin release increased nearly four-fold to 0.74 pmol/10 min when ganglia were incubated in 120 mM K+. 5. The rates of ganglionic serotonin release in 120 mM K+ were quantitatively similar in these three, experimentally important species of leeches: Hirudo medicinalis, Macrobdella decora and Haementeria ghilianii. 6. Ionic substitution experiments with the divalent cations Mg2+ and Co2+ indicated that the release of serotonin from leech ganglia is mediated by a Ca2+ dependent process. 7. The serotonin-uptake blockers, imipramine and chlorimipramine, did not increase the amount of serotonin released in elevated potassium. 8. Vitally staining the identified serotonin-containing neurons with Neutral Red dye did not reduce the quantity of serotonin that was released from the ganglia in elevated potassium. 9. This study demonstrates the capacity of leech ganglia to release the neurochemical serotonin, and the rates of transmitter release increase with the degree of depolarization of serotonin-containing neurons.     

Distribution and partial characterization of CREB-like immunoreactivity in the medicinal leech Hirudo

The presence and distribution of immunoreactivity to the cyclic AMP response element binding protein (CREB) were determined in the central nervous system (CNS) and in peripheral tissues of the medicinal leech Hirudo. Western blots revealed several CREB-immunoreactive (CREB-IR) bands including one whose molecular weight (43–44 kDa) was similar to mammalian CREB. The 43–44 kDa CREB-like protein was detected in nuclear extracts of the ventral nerve cord and was not observed following preincubation of the primary antiserum with the epitope sequence. CREB-like immunoreactivity was detected in extracts from each of six regions of the leech CNS, and in extracts from leech body wall musculature, crop, intestine, jaw musculature, pharynx, and salivary tissues. Whole mounts of leech ganglia revealed specific CREB-IR in a restricted population of neurons distributed throughout the leech CNS. Apparent homologues to a pair of CREB-IR dorsolateral neurons were observed in most ganglia along the ventral nerve cord. Several CREB-IR neurons exhibited segmental specificity. A number of neurons stained with an antiserum to the cyclic AMP response element modulator (CREM). These neurons showed no overlap in location with CREB-IR neurons, and this staining was not eliminated with a preabsorption control. Possible roles for a CREB-like protein in the leech are discussed. Electronic Publication     

Differential channeling of sensory stimuli onto a motor neuron in the leech

We studied a specific sensory-motor pathway in the isolated leech ganglia. Pressure-sensitive mechanosensory neurons were stimulated with trains of action potentials at 5–20 Hz while recording the responses of the annulus erector motorneurons that control annuli erection. The response of the annulus erector neurons was a succession of excitatory postsynaptic potentials followed by inhibitory postsynaptic potentials. The excitatory postsynaptic potentials had a brief time-course while the inhibitory postsynaptic potentials had a prolonged time-course that enabled their temporal summation. Thus, the net effect of pressure-sensitive neuron stimulation on the annulus erector neurons was inhibitory. Both phases of the response were mediated by chemical transmission; the excitatory postsynaptic potentials were transmitted via a monosynaptic pathway, and the inhibitory postsynaptic potentials via a polysynaptic one. The pattern of expression of this dual response depended on the field of innervation of the sensory neuron and it was under the influence of cell 151, a non-spiking interneuron, that could regulate the expression of the hyperpolarization. The interaction between pressure-sensitive neurons and annulus erector neuron reveals how sensory specificity, connectivity pattern and regulatory elements interplay in a specific sensory-motor network. Accepted: 6 November 1998     

Voltage-Induced Activation of Mechanosensitive Cation Channels of Leech Neurons

The voltage dependence of stretch-activated cation channels in leech central neurons was studied in cell-free configurations of the patch-clamp technique. We established that stretch-activated channels excised from identified cell bodies of desheathed ganglia, as well as from neurons in culture, were slowly and reversibly activated by depolarizing membrane potentials. Negative pressure stimuli, applied to the patch pipette during a slow periodical modulation of membrane potential, enhanced channel activity, whereas positive pressures depressed it. Voltage-induced channel activation was observed, with soft glass pipettes, both in inside-out and outside-out membrane patches, at negative and positive reference potentials, respectively. The results presented in this study demonstrate that membrane depolarization induces slow activation of stretch-activated channels of leech central neurons. This phenomenon is similar to that found in Xenopus oocytes, however, some peculiar features of the voltage dependence in leech stretch-activated channels indicate that specific membrane-glass interactions might not necessarily be involved. Moreover, following depolarization, stretch-activated channels in membrane patches from neurons in culture exhibited significantly shorter delay to activation (sec) than their counterparts from neurons of freshly isolated ganglia (hundreds of sec).     

Positive feedback loops sustain repeating bursts in neuronal circuits

Voluntary movements in animals are often episodic, with abrupt onset and termination. Elevated neuronal excitation is required to drive the neuronal circuits underlying such movements; however, the mechanisms that sustain this increased excitation are largely unknown. In the medicinal leech, an identified cascade of excitation has been traced from mechanosensory neurons to the swim oscillator circuit. Although this cascade explains the initiation of excitatory drive (and hence swim initiation), it cannot account for the prolonged excitation (10–100 s) that underlies swim episodes. We present results of physiological and theoretical investigations into the mechanisms that maintain swimming activity in the leech. Although intrasegmental mechanisms can prolong stimulus-evoked excitation for more than one second, maintained excitation and sustained swimming activity requires chains of several ganglia. Experimental and modeling studies suggest that mutually excitatory intersegmental interactions can drive bouts of swimming activity in leeches. Our model neuronal circuits, which incorporated mutually excitatory neurons whose activity was limited by impulse adaptation, also replicated the following major experimental findings: (1) swimming can be initiated and terminated by a single neuron, (2) swim duration decreases with experimental reduction in nerve cord length, and (3) swim duration decreases as the interval between swim episodes is reduced.     

Control of leech swimming activity by the cephalic ganglia

We investigated the role played by the cephalic nervous system in the control of swimming activity in the leech, Hirudo medicinalis, by comparing swimming activity in isolated leech nerve cords that included the head ganglia (supra- and subesophageal ganglia) with swimming activity in nerve cords from which these ganglia were removed. We found that the presence of these cephalic ganglia had an inhibitory influence on the reliability with which stimulation of peripheral (DP) nerves and intracellular stimulation of swim-initiating neurons initiated and maintained swimming activity. In addition, swimming activity recorded from both oscillator and motor neurons in preparations that included head ganglia frequently exhibited irregular bursting patterns consisting of missed, weak, or sustained bursts. Removal of the two head ganglia as well as the first segmental ganglion eliminated this irregular activity pattern. We also identified a pair of rhythmically active interneurons, SRN1, in the subesophageal ganglion that, when depolarized, could reset the swimming rhythm. Thus the cephalic ganglia and first segmental ganglion of the leech nerve cord are capable of exerting a tonic inhibitory influence as well as a modulatory effect on swimming activity in the segmental nerve cord.     

Sensorin-A immunocytochemistry reveals putative mechanosensory neurons inLymnaea CNS

The pond snailLymnaea stagnalis is a useful model system for studying the neural basis of behaviour but the mechanosensory inputs that impact on behaviours such as respiration, locomotion, reproduction and feeding are not known. InAplysia, the peptide sensorin-A appears to be specific to a class of central mechanosensory neurons. We show that in theLymnaea central nervous system sensorin-A immunocytochemistry reveals a discrete pattern of staining involving well over 100 neurons. Identifiable sensorin positive clusters of neurons are located in the buccal and cerebral ganglia, and a single large neuron is immunopositive in each pedal ganglion. These putative mechanosensory neurons are not in the same locations as previously identified motoneurons, interneurons or neurosecretory cells. As would be expected for a mechanoafferent, sensorin positive fibres were found in nerve tracts innervating the body wall. This study lays the foundation for future electrophysiological and behavioural analysis of these putative mechanosensory neurons.     

Processing of sensory signals by a non-spiking neuron in the leech

The non-spiking neurons 151 are present as bilateral pairs in each midbody ganglion of the leech nervous system and they are electrically coupled to several motorneurons. Intracellular recordings were used to investigate how these neurons process input from the mechanosensory P neurons in isolated ganglia. Induction of spike trains (15 Hz) in single P cells evoked responses that combined depolarizing and hyperpolarizing phases in cells 151. The phasic depolarizations, transmitted through spiking interneurons, reversed at around -20 mV. The hyperpolarization had two components, both reversing at around -65 mV, and which were inhibited by strychnine (10 micromol l(-1)). The faster component was transmitted through spiking interneurons and the slower component through a direct P-151 interaction. Short trains (<400 ms) of P cell spikes (15 Hz) evoked the phasic depolarizations superimposed on the hyperpolarization, while long spike trains (>500 ms) produced a succession of depolarizations that masked the hyperpolarizing phase. The amplitude and duration of the hyperpolarization reached their maximum at the initial spikes in a train, while the depolarizations persisted throughout the duration of the stimulus train. Both phases of the response were relatively unaffected by the spike frequency (5-25 Hz). The non-spiking neurons 151 processed the sensory signals in the temporal rather than in the amplitude domain.     

Network interactions among sensory neurons in the leech

Interactions among mechanosensory neurons, sensitive to touch, pressure and nociceptive stimuli in the leech nervous system were studied in isolated ganglia and in body-wall preparations. Pairs of touch-pressure, touch-nociceptive and pressure-nociceptive neurons were tested by suprathreshold stimulation of one neuron while recording the response of the other, in both directions. Pressure and nociceptive stimulation evoked depolarizing and hyperpolarizing responses in touch cells, mediated by interneurons. The relative expression of these responses depended on the stimulus duration. One or two pressure cell spikes produced, predominantly, a depolarization of the touch cells, and increasing number of spikes evoked a hyperpolarization. Nociceptive cells produced primarily the hyperpolarization of touch cells at any stimulus duration. When touch cells were induced to fire by injection of positive current into the soma, stimulation of pressure cells inhibited touch cell activity. However, when touch cells were induced to fire by peripheral stimulation, pressure cell activation failed to inhibit touch cell firing. The results suggest that excitation of pressure and nociceptive cells would not limit the responses of touch cells to peripheral stimuli, but would inhibit the firing of touch cells evoked by their central connectivity network.     

Extension and retraction of axonal projections by some developing neurons in the leech depends upon the existence of neighboring homologues. II. The AP and AE neurons

To assess the generality of our previous finding (Gao and Macagno, 1987) that segmental homologues play a role in the establishment of the pattern of axonal projections of the heart accessory HA neurons, we have extended our studies to two other identified leech neurons: the anterior pagoda (AP) neurons and the annulus erector (AE) motor neurons. Bilateral pairs of AP neurons are found in the first through the twentieth segmental ganglia (SG1 through SG20) of the leech ventral nerve cord. All AP neurons initially extend axonal projections to the contralateral periphery as well as longitudinal projections along the contralateral interganglionic connective nerves toward anterior and posterior neighboring ganglia. Although the peripheral projections are maintained by all AP neurons throughout the life of the animal, the longitudinal projections disappear in all but two segments: the AP neurons in SG1 maintain their anterior projections and extend them into the head ganglion, and those in SG20 maintain their posterior projections and extend them into SG21 and the tail ganglion. When single AP neurons are deleted anywhere along the nerve cord before processes begin to atrophy, however, the longitudinal projections are retained by their ipsilateral homologues in adjacent ganglia. The rescued processes appear to take over the projections of the deleted neurons. In cases where two or more AP neurons on the same side of the nerve cord are deleted from adjacent ganglia, a contralateral homologue sometimes extends projections to the periphery ipsilaterally or on both sides. We obtained similar results when we deleted single AE neurons from midbody ganglia. Thus, our experiments with three different identified neurons consistently show that the initial pattern of projections is the same in all ganglia, but that the existence of homologues in adjacent ganglia leads to the pruning of some of the initial projections. A consequence of this homologue-dependent process retraction is that neurons normally lacking neighboring homologues will have patterns of projections different from those neurons that do have such neighbors. Process loss by the HA, AP, and AE neurons may be the result either of competition for targets, inputs, or growth factors or of direct interactions among homologous cells.     

Glutamate-like immunoreactivity in the leech central nervous system

Summary Using a monoclonal antibody for glutamate the distribution was determined of glutamate-like immunoreactive neurons in the leech central nervous system (CNS). Glutamate-like immunoreactive neurons (GINs) were found to be localized to the anterior portion of the leech CNS: in the first segmental ganglion and in the subesophageal ganglion. Exactly five pairs of GINs consistently reacted with the glutamate antibody. Two medial pairs of GINs were located in the subesophageal ganglion and shared several morphological characteristics with two medial pairs of GINs in the first segmental ganglion. An additional lateral pair of GINs was also located in segmental ganglion 1. A pair of glutamate-like immunoreactive neurons, which are potential homologs of the lateral pair of GINs in segmental ganglion 1, were occasionally observed in more posterior segmental ganglia along with a selective group of neuronal processes. Thus only a small, localized population of neurons in the leech CNS appears to use glutamate as their neurotransmitter.     

Embryonic electrical connections appear to prefigure a behavioral circuit in the leech CNS

During development, many embryos show electrical coupling among neurons that is spatially and temporally regulated. For example, in vertebrate embryos extensive dye coupling is seen during the period of circuit formation, suggesting that electrical connections could prefigure circuits, but it has been difficult to identify which neuronal types are coupled. We have used the leech Hirudo medicinalis to follow the development of electrical connections within the circuit that produces local bending. This circuit consists of three layers of neurons: four mechanosensory neurons (P cells), 17 identified interneurons, and approximately 24 excitatory and inhibitory motor neurons. These neurons can be identified in embryos, and we followed the spatial and temporal dynamics as specific connections developed. Injecting Neurobiotin into identified cells of the circuit revealed that electrical connections were established within this circuit in a precise manner from the beginning. Connections first appeared between motor neurons; mechanosensory neurons and interneurons started to connect at least a day later. This timing correlates with the development of behaviors, so the pattern of emerging connectivity could explain the appearance first of spontaneous behaviors (driven by a electrically coupled motor network) and then of evoked behaviors (when sensory neurons and interneurons are added to the circuit).     

Glutamate-like immunoreactivity in the leech central nervous system.

Using a monoclonal antibody for glutamate the distribution was determined of glutamate-like immunoreactive neurons in the leech central nervous system (CNS). Glutamate-like immunoreactive neurons (GINs) were found to be localized to the anterior portion of the leech CNS: in the first segmental ganglion and in the subesophageal ganglion. Exactly five pairs of GINs consistently reacted with the glutamate antibody. Two medial pairs of GINs were located in the subesophageal ganglion and shared several morphological characteristics with two medial pairs of GINs in the first segmental ganglion. An additional lateral pair of GINs was also located in segmental ganglion 1. A pair of glutamate-like immunoreactive neurons, which are potential homologs of the lateral pair of GINs in segmental ganglion 1, were occasionally observed in more posterior segmental ganglia along with a selective group of neuronal processes. Thus only a small, localized population of neurons in the leech CNS appears to use glutamate as their neurotransmitter.     

Statistical independence and neural computation in the leech ganglion

 In this report, the input/output relations in an isolated ganglion of the leech Hirudo medicinalis were studied by simultaneously using six or eight suction pipettes and two intracellular electrodes. Sensory input was mimicked by eliciting action potentials in mechanosensory neurons with intracellular electrodes. The integrated neural output was measured by recording extracellular voltage signals with pipettes sucking the roots and the connectives. A single evoked action potential activated electrical activity in at least a dozen different neurons, some of which were identified. This electrical activity was characterized by a high degree of temporal and spatial variability. The action potentials of coactivated neurons, i.e. activated by the same mechanosensory neuron, did not show any significant pairwise correlation. Indeed, the analysis of evoked action potentials indicates clear statistical independence among coactivated neurons, presumably originating from the independence of synaptic transmission at distinct synapses. This statistical independence may be used to increase reliability when neuronal activity is averaged or pooled. It is suggested that statistical independence among coactivated neurons may be a usual property of distributed processing of neuronal networks and a basic feature of neural computation. Received: 20 September 1999 / Accepted in revised form: 3 March 2000     

Attachment to an endogenous laminin-like protein initiates sprouting by leech neurons

Leech neurons in culture sprout rapidly when attached to extracts from connective tissue surrounding the nervous system. Laminin-like molecules that promote sprouting have now been isolated from this extracellular matrix. Two mAbs have been prepared that react on immunoblots with a approximately equal to 220- and a approximately equal to 340-kD polypeptide, respectively. These antibodies have been used to purify molecules with cross-shaped structures in the electron microscope. The molecules, of approximately equal to 10(3) kD on nonreducing SDS gels, have subunits of approximately equal to 340, 220, and 160-180 kD. Attachment to the laminin-like molecules was sufficient to initiate sprouting by single isolated leech neurons in defined medium. This demonstrates directly a function for a laminin-related invertebrate protein. The mAbs directed against the approximately equal to 220-kD chains of the laminin-like leech molecule labeled basement membrane extracellular matrix in leech ganglia and nerves. A polyclonal antiserum against the approximately equal to 220-kD polypeptide inhibited neurite outgrowth. Vertebrate laminin did not mediate the sprouting of leech neurons; similarly, the leech molecule was an inert substrate for vertebrate neurons. Although some traits of structure, function, and distribution are conserved between vertebrate laminin and the invertebrate molecule, our results suggest that the functional domains differ.