Somatotopy of human hand somatosensory cortex as studied in scalp EEG

We recorded somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) in scalp EEGs during stimulation of the median nerve, the ulnar nerve and the individual digits in 3 normal subjects and in 1 epilepsy patients. In this patient we also measured SEPs from chronically indwelling subdural grid electrodes during electrocorticography (ECoG). We applied dipole modelling techniques to study the 3-dimensional intracerebral locations and time activities of the neuronal sources underlying stimulation of different peripheral receptive fields. The sources underlying median nerve SEPs were located an average of 10.8 mm lateral inferior to those underlying ulnar nerve SEPs. Digit SEP sources showed a somatotopic arrangement from lateral inferior to medial superior in the order thumb, index finger, middle finger, ring finger and little finger, with some overlap or reversal for adjacent digits. The average distance between thumb and little finger was 12.5 mm. Thumb, index finger and middle finger were clustered around median nerve cortical representation, whereas ring finger and little finger were arranged around ulnar nerve cortex. In the epilepsy patient, the source localizations obtained in scalp EEGs showed good agreement with those on ECoGs. We conclude that SEPs recorded in scalp EEGs can be used to study functional topography of human somatosensory cortex non-invasively.     

Pain-related somatosensory evoked potentials following CO2 laser stimulation of foot in man

Since our previous study of pain somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) following CO₂ laser stimulation of the hand dorsum could not clarify whether the early cortical component NI was generated from the primary somatosensory cortex (SI) or the secondary somatosensory cortex (SII) or both, the scalp topography of SEPs following CO₂ laser stimulation of the foot dorsum was studied in 10 normal subjects and was compared with that of the hand pain SEPs and the conventional SEPs following electrical stimulation of the posterior tibial nerve recorded in 8 and 6 of the 10 subjects, respectively. Three components (N1, N2 and P2) were recorded for both foot and hand pain SEPs. N1 of the foot pain SEPs was maximal at the midline electrodes (Cz or CPz) in all data where that potential was recognized, but the potential field distribution was variable among subjects and even between two sides within the same subject. N1 of the hand pain SEPs was maximal at the contralateral central or midtemporal electrode. The scalp distribution of N2 and P2, however, was not different between the foot and hand pain SEPs. The mean peak latency of N1 following stimulation of foot and hand was found to be 191 msec and 150 msec, respectively, but there was no significant difference in the interpeak latency of Nl-N2 between foot and hand stimulation. It is therefore concluded that NI of the foot pain SEPs is generated mainly from the foot area of SI. The variable scalp distribution of the N7 component of the foot pain SEPs is likely due to an anatomical variability among subjects and even between sides.     

Topography of somatosensory evoked potentials to median nerve stimulation in patients with cerebral lesions

Scalp distributions and topographies of early cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) to median nerve stimulation were studied in 22 patients with 5 different types of cerebral lesion due to cerebrovascular disease or tumor (thalamic, postcentral subcortical, precentral subcortical, diffuse subcortical and parieto-occipital lesions) in order to investigate the origins of frontal (P20, N24) and central-parietal SEPs (N20, P22, P23).In 2 patients with thalamic syndrome, N16 was delayed in latency and N20/P20 were not recorded. No early SEP except for N16 was recorded in 2 patients with pure hemisensory loss due to postcentral subcortical lesion. In all 11 patients with pure hemiparesis or hemiplegia due to precentral subcortical lesion N20/P20 and P22, P23/N24 components were of normal peak latencies. The amplitude of N24 was significantly decreased in all 3 patients with complete hemiplegia. These findings support the hypothesis that N20/P20 are generated as a horizontal dipole in the central sulcus (3b), whereas P23/N24 are a reflection of multiple generators in pre- and post-rolandic fissures. P22 was very localized in the central area contralateral to the stimulation.Topographical studies of early cortical SEPs are useful for detecting each component in abnormal SEPs     

Early deflections of cerebral magnetic responses to median nerve stimulation

We have recorded early components of somatosensory evoked magnetic fields with a sensitive 7-channel first-order gradiometer using a wide recording passband (0.05–2000 Hz) and high sampling frequency (8000 Hz). The left median nerve was stimulated at the wrist and responses were recorded over the right hemisphere. The responses typically consisted of a N20m peaking at 18–20 msec, a small P22m peaking at 21–23 msec and a P27m peaking at 29–31 msec. The topography of N20m could be explained by a tangential current dipole in the posterior wall of the central sulcus (probably in area 3b). The equivalent dipoles of P27m were located on average 10 mm antero-medially to the sources of N20m. This suggests that P27m may get a contribution from the anterior wall of the central sulcus. An increase of stimulus repetition rate from 2 to 5 Hz decreased the amplitude of P27m more than that of N20m, which implies that these two deflactions are generated by different neural netwoks.     

Cerebral magnetic fields to lingual stimulation

We recorded cerebral magnetic fields to electric stimulation of the tongue in 7 healthy adults. The two main deflections of the response peaked around 55 msec (P55m) and 140 msec (N 140 m). During both oof them the magnetic field pattern, determined with a 7- or 24-channel SQUID magnetometer, suggested a dipolar current source. The topography of P55m can be explained by a tangential dipole at the first somatosensory cortex (SI) in the posterior wall of the central sulcus. The equivalent source of N140m is, on average, about 1 cm lateral to the source of P55m. The reported method allows non-invasive determination of the cortical tongue representation area.     

Somatosensory evoked potentials after removal of somatosensory cortex in man

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) to median nerve, ulnar nerve, thumb, middle finger, and posterior tibial nerve stimulation were recorded in a patient with a discrete resection of part of the postcentral somatosensory cortex as a treatment for focal epilepsy. Comparison of the different stimulation sites confirmed electrophysiologically the restricted locus of the lesion. The results strongly suggest that the early negative component (N20) and subsequent components recorded postcentrally are of cortical origin and depend upon postcentral gyrus cytoarchitectonic areas 3, 2, and 1. Moreover, these postcentral SEPs are distinct from precentrally recorded activity.     

High-frequency (600 Hz) SEP activities originating in the subcortical and cortical human somatosensory system

Digitally high-pass filtered median nerve SEP show an oscillatory burst of low-amplitude high-frequency (600 Hz) wavelets superimposed on the N20 component which itself is generated by excitatory postsynaptic potentials of area 3b pyramidal cells. Prior studies using magnetoencephalography (MEG) localized one wavelet generator close to the primary somatosensory hand cortex. Since MEG recordings are biased towards tangentially oriented and superficial generators, a dipole source analysis of 32-channel electric SEP recordings was employed here to test for the possibility of deep and/or radially oriented burst generators: in 10 normal subjects low noise (16 000 averages) median nerve SEP were evaluated using dipole source analysis before and after applying a digital 475 Hz high-pass filter. Two main oscillatory 600 Hz burst sources were modeled; (i) a deep burst source close to the thalamus, most active in a time window between the brain-stem P14 and the cortical N20 sources, detectable in 7 of 10 subjects; most probably, this activity originates from deep axon segments of thalamocortical fibers; and (ii) a subsequent burst source timed around the N20 and located in the vicinity of the primary somatosensory hand cortex in all subjects, which was already known from MEG data. This superficial oscillatory source may be dominated by repetitive activity conducted in the terminal segments of the thalamocortical projection fibers initiated by the thalamic burst generator.     

Giant central N20-P22 with normal area 3b N20-P20: an argument in favour of an area 3a generator of early median nerve cortical SEPs?

Generators of early cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) still remain to be precisely localised. This gap in knowledge has often resulted in unclear and contrasting SEPs localisation in patients with focal hemispheric lesions. We recorded SEPs to median nerve stimulation in a patient with right frontal astrocytoma, using a 19-channel recording technique. After stimulation of the left median nerve, N20 amplitude was normal when recorded by the parietal electrode contralateral to the stimulation, while it was abnormally enhanced in traces obtained by the contralateral central electrode. The amplitude of the frontal P20 response was within normal limits. This finding suggests that two dipolar sources, tangential and radial to the scalp surface, respectively, contribute concomitantly to N20 generation. The possible location of the N20 radial source in area 3a is discussed. The P22 potential was also recorded with increased amplitude by the central electrode contralateral to the stimulation, while N30 amplitude was normal in frontal and central traces. We propose that the radial dipolar source of P22 response is independent from both N20 and N30 generators and can be located either in 3a or in area 4. This report illustrates the usefulness of multichannel recordings in diagnosing dysfunction of the sensorimotor cortex in focal cortical lesions.     

Presurgical functional localization of primary somatosensory cortex by dipole tracing method of scalp-skull-brain head model applied to somatosensory evoked potential

The aim of the present study was to explore the utility of dipole tracing (DT) of a scalp-skull-brain (SSB) head model in preoperative functional localization of the human brain. Nine patients who underwent surgery of mass lesions around the central sulcus (CS) were employed. By using SSB/DT, dipole source location of early cortical components of the somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) was estimated before surgery. Motor cortex, CS and primary somatosensory cortex were determined by cortical SEP during surgery. After surgery precise functional mapping was reproduced in MRI, and the accuracy of DT was evaluated by measuring the distance between estimated dipole source and the posterior bank of the CS. We defined this distance as localization error of DT. In 4 cases without structural change around the sensorimotor cortex, localization error ranged from 1 to 4 mm with an average of 2 mm. In 5 cases with structural alteration of sensorimotor cortex, localization error ranged from 6 to 10 mm with an average of 8 mm. The difference in localization error between the two groups was statistically significant, and may have been caused by changes of conductance near sensorimotor cortex in the latter group. Functional localization by DT was accurate and useful. But localization error could not be ignored in cases with structural alteration in the sensorimotor cortex.     

SEPs to finger joint input lack the N20-P20 response that is evoked by tactile inputs: contrast between cortical generators in areas 3b and 2 in humans

A method using a DC servo motor is described to produce brisk angular movements at finger interphalangeal joints in humans. Small passive flexions of 2° elicited sizable somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) starting with a contralateral positive P34 parietal response thought to reflect activation of a radial equivalent dipole generator in area 2 which receives joint inputs. By contrast, electric stimulation of tactile (non-joint) inputs from the distal phalanx evoked the usual contralateral negative N20 reflecting a tangential equivalent dipole generator in area 3b. Finger joint inputs also evoked a precentral positivity equivalent to the P22 of motor area 4, and a large frontal negativity equivalent to N30. It is suggested that natural stimulation allows human SEP components to the differentiated in conjunction with distinct cortical somatotopic projections.     

Unmasking of cortical SEP components by changes in stimulus rate: a topographic study

We performed topographic mapping of somatosensory responses to median nerve stimulation delivered at 2, 5 and 10 Hz. Parietal N20 was significantly attenuated in 10 Hz somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs), while central P22 diminished between 2 and 5 Hz, remaining stable thereafter. The single component most affected by increasing stimulus rate was N30, which abated by more than 50% in 10 Hz SEPs, as compared with basal responses. N30 attenuation disclosed the existence of an earlier negative component, N24, which appeared as a notch on the N30 ascending slope in 2 Hz SEPs, but became a well-defined peak at higher stimulus rates. The N24 negativity was not significantly modified by stimulus rate; it had a parietal counterpart (P24) with the same peak latency and identical behavior during the experimental procedure. Both P24 and N24 could be differentiated from central P22 on the basis of topographical distribution and response to stimulus frequency. P22 topography could be the result of a radially oriented generator, while P24/N24 appeared as the two poles of a neural source tangential to the scalp. P27 was seen in 40% of the subjects only; it is suggested that P27 is itself a composite potential to which the generator of N30 could contribute in part. We conclude that there is no single “optimal” stimulation rate for SEP recording. On the contrary, combination of different frequencies of stimulation should enhance the diagnostic utility of this technique by allowing a more selective assessment of overlapping activities.     

Frontal distribution of early cortical somatosensory evoked potentials to median nerve stimulation

The topography of early frontal SEPs (P20 and N26) to left median nerve stimulation was studied in 30 normal subjects and 3 patients with the left frontal bone defect. The amplitudes of P20 and N26 were maximum at the frontal electrode (F4) contralateral to the stimulation and markedly decreased at frontal electrodes ipsilateral to the site of stimulation. There was, however, no latency difference of P20 and N26 between ipsilateral and contralateral frontal electrodes. These results suggest that the origin of the ipsilateral and contralateral P20 and N26 is the same. The wide distribution of P20 and N26 over both frontal areas could be explained by assuming a smearing effect from generators actually located in the rolandic fissure and motor cortex.     

Middle-latency somatosensory evoked potentials following median and posterior tibial nerve stimulation in Down's syndrome

Middle-latency somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) following median and posterior tibial nerve stimulation were studied in 40 patients with Down's syndrome and in age- and gender-matched healthy controls as well as in middle-aged and aged healthy subjects. In median nerve SEPs, latencies of the initial cortical potentials, N18 and P18, showed no significant difference, but the following potentials N22, P25, N32, P41 and P46 were relatively or significantly shorter in latency in Down's patients than in the controls. Amplitudes of all components in Down's patients were significantly larger than those of age- and gender-matched controls as well as of those of middle-aged healthy subjects, but there was only a small difference in their amplitudes from aged healthy subjects. Results of posterior tibial nerve SEPs were generally consistent with those of median nerve SEPs. Therefore, ‘short latency with large amplitude’ is the main characteristic of middle-latency SEPs in Down's syndrome, possibly related to accelerated physiological aging of the central nervous system.     

Scalp topography of mechanically and electrically evoked somatosensory potentials in man

Scalp topography of somatosensory evoked potentials following mechanical (SEPs(M)) and electrical (SEPs(E)) stimulation of the left middle finger was investigated with linked ear reference in 21 normal young adults. A small plastic ball (touch) or needle (pain) was used for the mechanical stimulation. With mechanical stimulation, at least 3 positive and 3 negative potentials (P19(M), N24(M), P29(M), N36(M), P49(M) and N61(M)) were found in the post-rolandic area contralateral to the stimulation. The wave form in SEPs(M) was similar to those in SEPs(E), but the peak latency of each component in SEPs(M) was 1–4 msec longer than that in SEPs(E). Earlier components such as P19(M), N24(M) and P29(M) were not as clearly recognized as corresponding components in SEPs(E). However, the wave form recorded on the hemisphere ipsilateral to the stimulation or in the frontal area contralateral to the stimulation showed a greater difference from subject to subject. P19(M), N24(M) and P29(M) correlated positively both with arm length and height of the subject. There was no significant difference of the wave form between the linked ear reference and the bipolar (C4-Fz) derivation. Wave form of SEPs(M) by needle stimulation did not significantly differ from that by plastic ball stimulation.     

Localization of sensorimotor cortex in neurosurgery by recording of somatosensory evoked potentials

The current method of localizing somatosensory and motor cortex during neurosurgical removal of abnormal tissue is Penfield's method of cortical stimulation. While useful, this method has drawbacks, in particular the need to operate under local anesthesia. Another method of localization, described here, involves intra-operative recording of short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials to stimulation of the contralateral median nerve, from electrodes placed directly on central cortex. Proper localization involves identification of potentials which invert in polarity across the central sulcus, identification of other potentials which are largest in the medial portion of the hand area of somatosensory cortex and do not polarity invert, and determination of the region of maximal potential amplitude. This method of localization works equally well whether the patient is under local or general anesthesia, but it occasionally fails in patients with tumors abutting or invading the hand area of sensorimotor cortex.     

The interaction of the somatosensory evoked potentials to simultaneous finger stimuli in the human central nervous system. A study using direct recordings

In order to investigate the interaction of sensory electrophysiologic fields arising from the adjacent second (II) and third (III) fingers and the distant second and fifth (V) fingers, direct recordings of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) were performed from the sensory and motor cortices, the sensory thalamic nucleus (nucleus ventralis caudalis, VC) and the cuneate nucleus in humans during neurosurgical operations. Electrical stimulation was given to the II, III or V fingers individually, and also to pairs of either the II and III fingers or the II and V fingers simultaneously. The interaction ratio OR) was devised as the ratio of amplitude attenuation caused by the simultaneous stimulation to two fingers compared with the amplitude of the arithmetically summed SEPs to the individual stimulation of two fingers. The IRs were calculated on N20 and P25 from the sensory cortex, P22 from the motor cortex, P17_thal from the VC, and N16_cune and P35_cune from the cuneate nucleus.With both stimulations to the II and III fingers and the II and V fingers, P25 showed the greatest IR, followed by P22, then by P17_thal while N16_cune exhibited the smallest IR. N20 and P35_cune showed similar IRs and significantly greater IRs with II and III finger stimulation compared with II and V finger stimulation.These results thus indicate that the interaction of somatosensory impulses occurs in several structures along the sensory pathway in CNS, including the cuneate nucleus, the sensory thalamic nucleus, as well as sensory and motor cortices, with the greatest IRs in the cerebral cortices and the weakest ones in the brain-stem. They also suggest that the receptive fields of the fingers in the cortical area generating N20 are arranged according to the order of the fingers while those in the generating sites for cortical P25 and P22, thalamic P17_thal and cuneate N16_cune tend to be arranged in clusters, while P35_cune is possibly modulated by the somatosensory cortex through a long-loop feedback pathway.     

Scalp-recorded short and middle latency peroneal somatosensory evoked potentials in normals: comparison with peroneal and median nerve SEPs in patients with unilateral hemispheric lesions

Peroneal somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) were performed on 23 normal subjects and 9 selected patients with unilateral hemispheric lesions involving somatosensory pathways.Recording obtained from right and left peroneal nerve (PN) stimulations were compared in all subjects, using open and restricted frequency bandpass filters. Restricted filter (100–3000 Hz) and linked ear reference (A1–A2) enhanced the detection of short latency potentials (P1, P2, N1 with mean peak latency of 17.72, 21.07, 24.09) recorded from scalp electrodes over primary sensory cortex regions. Patients with lesions in the parietal cortex and adjacent subcortical areas demonstrated low amplitude and poorly formed short latency peroneal potentials, and absence of components beyond P3 peak with mean latency of 28.06 msec. In these patients, recordings to right and left median nerve (MN) stimulation showed absence or distorted components subsequent to N1 (N18) potential.These observations suggest that components subsequent to P3 potential in response to PN stimulation, and subsequent to N18 potential in response to MN stimulation, are generated in the parietal cortical regions.     

The organization of somatosensory cortex in the short-tailed opossum (Monodelphis domestica)

The organization of neocortex in the short-tailed opossum (Monodelphis domestica) was explored with multiunit microelectrode recordings from middle layers of cortex. Microelectrode maps were subsequently related to the chemoarchitecture of flattened cortical preparations, sectioned parallel to the cortical surface and processed for either cytochrome oxidase (CO) or NADPH-diaphorase (NADPHd) histochemistry. The recordings revealed the presence of at least two systematic representations of the contralateral body surface located in a continuous strip of cortex running from the rhinal sulcus to the medial wall. The primary somatosensory area (S1) was located medially while secondary somatosensory cortex (S2) formed a laterally located mirror image of S1. Auditory cortex was located in lateral cortex at the caudal border of S2, and some electrode penetrations in this area responded to both auditory and somatosensory stimulation. Auditory cortex was outlined by a dark oval visible in flattened brain sections. A large primary visual cortex (V1) was located at the caudal pole of cortex, and also consistently corresponded to a large chemoarchitecturally visible oval. Cortex just rostral and lateral to V1 responded to visual stimulation, while bimodal auditory/visual responses were obtained in an area between V1 and somatosensory cortex. The results are compared with brain organization in other marsupials and with placentals and the evolution of cortical areas in mammals is discussed.     

The organization of somatosensory cortex in the short-tailed opossum ( Monodelphis domestica )

The organization of neocortex in the short-tailed opossum ( Monodelphis domestica ) was explored with multiunit microelectrode recordings from middle layers of cortex. Microelectrode maps were subsequently related to the chemoarchitecture of flattened cortical preparations, sectioned parallel to the cortical surface and processed for either cytochrome oxidase (CO) or NADPH-diaphorase (NADPHd) histochemistry. The recordings revealed the presence of at least two systematic representations of the contralateral body surface located in a continuous strip of cortex running from the rhinal sulcus to the medial wall. The primary somatosensory area (S1) was located medially while secondary somatosensory cortex (S2) formed a laterally located mirror image of S1. Auditory cortex was located in lateral cortex at the caudal border of S2, and some electrode penetrations in this area responded to both auditory and somatosensory stimulation. Auditory cortex was outlined by a dark oval visible in flattened brain sections. A large primary visual cortex (V1) was located at the caudal pole of cortex, and also consistently corresponded to a large chemoarchitecturally visible oval. Cortex just rostral and lateral to V1 responded to visual stimulation, while bimodal auditory/visual responses were obtained in an area between V1 and somatosensory cortex. The results are compared with brain organization in other marsupials and with placentals and the evolution of cortical areas in mammals is discussed.     

Modality-specific organization for cutaneous and proprioceptive sense in human primary sensory cortex studied by chronic epicortical recording

Modality specificity of human primary somatosensory cortex was studied by recording somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) from subdural electrodes in a patient with intractable focal motor seizure. A newly developed device was used for selectively activating proprioception. The spatial and temporal distributions of proprioception-related SEPs elicited by brisk passive flexion movement at the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint of the middle finger (4 degrees in 25 ms) were quite different from those to cutaneous sense evoked by electric stimulation of the digital nerve at the same site. It was for the first time demonstrated that proprioception-related SEPs following passive finger movement do not originate in area 3b, which was clearly activated by cutaneous stimulation, and that other sites at the sensorimotor cortex such as areas 2, 3a and 4 possibly contribute to the cortical processing of proprioception.