Lattice organs in y-cyprids of the Facetotecta and their significance in the phylogeny of the Crustacea Thecostraca

Scanning and transmission electron microscopy (SEM and TEM) were used to study lattice organs in facetotectan y‐cyprids from the White Sea and from Norwegian and Bahamian waters. The larvae represent at least four and possibly five different species of Facetotecta. Y‐cyprids have five pairs of lattice organs in the head shield (carapace) organized into two anterior pairs and three posterior pairs. Both groups of lattice organs are arranged around a large central pore. The facetotectan lattice organs are elongate areas with a longitudinal keel, just as in the Ascothoracida and some Cirripedia Acrothoracica. The terminal pore of the organs is situated posteriorly in all five pairs. TEM confirms that the organs have the same general morphology as in the Cirripedia and Ascothoracida, namely, a cuticular chamber into which project ciliary segments from the chemosensory cells. Unlike Cirripedia the cuticular roof of the chamber lacks any pores. We conclude that five pairs of lattice organs represent an autapomorphy for the Thecostraca, which supports the monophyly of this taxon. In the ground pattern the terminal pore is posterior in all five pairs. The anterior position of the pore in lattice organ pair 2 is apomorphic for the Cirripedia, while within this taxon an anterior position also in pair 1 is apomorphic for a monophylum comprising the Thoracica and the Rhizocephala. Minute pores in the roof of the organs is another apomorphy of the Cirripedia, but its elaboration into pores visible with SEM may have been subject to some homoplasy. Since lattice organs are omnipresent in the settling instar of the Thecostraca they probably serve a critical role for the function of these cypris or cypris‐like larvae.     

The Chemoreceptive Lattice Organs in Cypris Larvae Develop from Naupliar Setae (Thecostraca: Cirripedia, Ascothoracida and Facetotecta)

Lattice organs are peculiar chemoreceptors found only in the Crustacea Thecostraca (Facetotecta, Ascothoracida, Cirripedia). In these taxa, five pairs occur in the head shield (carapace) of the terminal larval instar (y-cyprid, ascothoracid larva, cyprid), which is the settlement stage. Lattice organs represent an autapomorphy for the Thecostraca but their evolutionary origin and possible homologues in other Crustacea remain obscure. We have used scanning electron microscopy to describe the setation pattern of the head shield in late nauplii of one species of Ascothoracida, one species of Facetotecta and several species of the Cirripedia Thoracica, Acrothoracica, and Rhizocephala. The naupliar head shield always carries two pairs setae situated anteriorly near the midline. Each of these setae carry a single pore, and positional, structural and ontogenetic evidence show that these setae are homologous in all the examined species and that they represent precursors of the two anterior pairs of lattice organs of the succeeding larval stage, viz., the ascothoracid larva (Ascothoracida), y-cyprid (Facetotecta), and cyprid (Cirripedia). This leads us to infer that lattice organs are among the most highly modified sensilla in all Crustacea and they have in most cases lost all external resemblance to a seta. The nauplii of the Rhizocephala carry an additional three pairs of setae situated more posteriorly on the head shield and they could be precursors of the three posterior pairs of lattice organs. All other species examined lack these posterior setae, except the Facetotecta which have one posteriorly situated pair.     

TEM studies on the lattice organs of cirripede cypris larvae (Crustacea, Thecostraca, Cirripedia)

 Lattice organs consist of five pairs of sensory organs situated on the dorsal carapace in cypris larvae of the Crustacea Cirripedia. The lattice organs in cypris larvae of Trypetesa lampas (Acrothoracica) and Peltogaster paguri (Rhizocephala) represent the two main types found in cirripedes, but only minor differences exist at the TEM level. Each lattice organ is innervated by two bipolar, primary receptor cells. The inner dendritic segment of each receptor cell carries two outer dendritic segments. The outer dendritic segments contain modified cilia with a short ciliary segment (9×2+0 structure). Two sheath cells envelop the dendrite except for the distal ends of the outer dendritic segments. This distal end enters a cavity in the carapace cuticle and reaches a terminal pore situated at the far end of the cavity. The cuticle above the cavity is modified. In both species the epicuticle is partly perforated by numerous small pores and the underlying exocuticle is much thinner and less electron dense than the regular exocuticle. Lattice organs very probably have a chemosensory function and are homologous with the sensory dorsal organ of other crustacean taxa. Accepted: 18 August 1998     

Remarkable convergent evolution in specialized parasitic Thecostraca (Crustacea)

Background  

The Thecostraca are arguably the most morphologically and biologically variable group within the Crustacea, including both suspension feeders (Cirripedia: Thoracica and Acrothoracica) and parasitic forms (Cirripedia: Rhizocephala, Ascothoracida and Facetotecta). Similarities between the metamorphosis found in the Facetotecta and Rhizocephala suggests a common evolutionary origin, but until now no comprehensive study has looked at the basic evolution of these thecostracan groups.     

External morphology of the two cypridiform ascothoracid-larva instars of Dendrogaster: The evolutionary significance of the two-step metamorphosis and comparison of lattice organs between larvae and adult males (Crustacea, Thecostraca, Ascothoracida)

We describe the external morphology of the two cypridiform larval instars (first and second ascothoracid-larvae, or “a-cyprids”) of the ascothoracidan genus Dendrogaster. Ascothoracid-larvae of five species were studied with light and scanning electron microscopy, including both ascothoracid-larval instars in Dendrogaster orientalis Wagin. The first and second instars of the ascothoracid-larvae differ in almost all external features. The carapace of instar 1 has a smooth surface and lacks pores, setae, and lattice organs, while instar 2 has all these structures. The antennules of the first instar have only a rudimentary armament, the labrum does not encircle the maxillae, thoracopods 2-3 are not armed with a plumose coxal seta, and the abdomen is four-segmented (versus five-segmented in instar 2). Thus, the first ascothoracid-larva of Dendrogaster represents a transitional, generally brooded stage between the naupliar stages and the dispersive and fully functional second ascothoracid-larva that accomplishes settlement. The presence of two instars of ascothoracid-larvae (a-cyprids) in members of the order Dendrogastrida differs from the single cypridiform instar found in the Cirripedia (cyprid) and Facetotecta (y-cyprid), and we discuss the evolutionary significance of these ontogenies. We found lattice organs in both the second ascothoracid-larvae and in adult males of Dendrogaster. We could not observe both ascothoracid-larvae and males in any single species, but our data suggests that the lattice organs change significantly at the molt between these two instars. The lattice organs of second ascothoracid-larvae have no distinct keel and are situated in wide, shallow pits, whereas they have the ground pattern “crest-in-a-trough” morphology in adult males of two additional species examined for comparison. The positions of the terminal pores of lattice organs 1 and 2 also seem to change during maturation. These findings show that comparative data on lattice organ morphology for phylogenetic purposes must derive from strictly homologous instars, viz., the second ascothoracid-larva (a-cyprid) of the Ascothoracida, the y-cyprid of the Facetotecta, and the cyprid of Cirripedia. The ascothoracid-larvae of Dendrogaster and those of the family Ascothoracidae have four pairs of lattice organs, which suggests that this genus and family form a monophylum, to the exclusion of Ulophysema, which then brings into question the monophyly of the Dendrogastridae. Ulophysema is currently placed in the Dendrogastridae, but its second ascothoracid-larva has lattice organs of different and more plesiomorphic number and morphology. We briefly review lattice organ morphology across the Thecostraca. These organs are normally considered structures of the cypridiform larva and their presence in adult (males) Ascothoracida is unique in the Thecostraca. The continued morphological modification of these sensory structures in males compared to ascothoracid-larvae may suggest that they originated in adult thecostracans, but have come to be functional in the cypridiform larvae as well.     

Cypris morphology in the barnacles Ibla and Paralepas (Crustacea: Cirripedia Thoracica) implications for cirripede evolution

We used scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to describe cypris morphology in species of the barnacles Ibla and Paralepas, both of which are pivotal in understanding cirripede evolution. In Ibla, we also studied late naupliar stages with video and SEM. Special emphasis was put on the lattice organs, the antennules and the thorax and telson. In Paralepas we had settled specimens only and could therefore only investigate the carapace with the lattice organs. Cyprids of Ibla quadrivalvis and Paralepas dannevigi have five sets of lattice organs, grouped as two anterior and three posterior pairs. The organs are of the pore‐field type and the terminal pore is situated anteriorly in the first pair, just as in the Rhizocephala and the Thoracica. In Ibla the armament of antennular sensilla resembles that found in the Thoracica but differs from the Rhizocephala. The absence of setules on the A and B setae sited terminally on the fourth antennular segment is a similarity with the Acrothoracica. The attachment disc is angled rather than facing distally and is encircled by a low cuticular velum. The thoracopods have two‐segmented endopods and exopods as in the Thoracica, but the number, shape, and position of thoracopodal setae differ somewhat from other species of that superorder. Both Ibla and Paralepas cyprids have a deeply cleaved telson, but no independent abdominal part. In cypris morphology, Ibla and Paralepas show several synapomorphies with the clade comprising Rhizocephala and Thoracica and there are no specific apomorphies with either the Acrothoracica, the Rhizocephala or any particular subgroup within the Thoracica. This is in agreement with recent molecular evidence that Ibla (Ibliformes) is the sister taxon to all other Thoracica and the ibliforms therefore become the outgroup of choice for studying character evolution within the superorder. Paralepas, and other pedunculated barnacles without shell plates, are apparently not primitive but are secondarily evolved and nested within the Thoracica. J. Morphol., 2009. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

The Phylogenetic Position of the Rhizocephala: Are They Truly Barnacles?

Incorporation of the Rhizocephala in the Cirripedia, reflecting the traditional view that these parasites evolved from a setose feeding barnacle, has recently been challenged in favour of rhizocephalans being the sister group to all other Thecostraca or a scenario where they evolved from a free-living, ‘precirripede’ ancestor. Adult morphology is useless in discussing the monophyly of the Cirripedia, since rhizocephalan adults are too reduced to furnish any phylogenetic evidence. But numerous, detailed similarities in nauplii and cyprids of the Thoracica, Acrothoracica and Rhizocephala as well as the ultrastructure of their sperm are synapomorphic relative to other Thecostraca and indicate that these three orders form a monophylum. There is evidence that the stylet in the rhizocephalan kentrogon is homologous to an element in the ancestral mouth field. If so, the Rhizocephala probably evolved before setose feeding was adopted, and constitute the sister group to the Acrothoracica and Thoracica. This conclusion is based on frail evidence so the term Cirripedia should be retained to comprise the Rhizocephala, Thoracica, and Acrothoracica. These three orders all possess remarkably similar cyprids, adapted to accomplish irreversible settlement by cement secretion and initiate metamorphosis, so their last common ancestor was most probably a permanently sessile organism.     

Developmental Patterns and Hypotheses of Homology in the Antennules of Thecostracan Nauplius Larvae (Crustacea)

Abstract Antennular development is summarized for non–brooded nauplius larvae of the Ascothoracida (families Lauridae and Petrarcidae) and for selected nauplii of the Facetotecta. In the Cirripedia Thoracica, nauplii of the Lepadomorpha and Scalpellomorpha/Sessilia are shown to differ in their patterns of antennular setal addition and division into articles, and one or two possible apomorphies for each group are identified. Several variations of the scalpellomorphan/sessilian pattern are outlined. These data on the Ascothoracida, Facetotecta, and Cirripedia provide the basis for modifying an earlier proposal of structural homologies among the naupliar antennules of thecostracan maxillopodans. ‘Virtual’ articles (ones that are never completely free) are invoked to account for setae that ‘jump’ across article boundaries at molts and for supposedly homologous setae found on adjacent articles in different taxa. The identities of the preaxial setae in the Cirripedia are ambiguous and force consideration of two models for that group and for the thecostracan antennular Bauplan; the latter may have included up to 11 or 12 articles, more than the previously supposed 8 or 9. The scoring of characters used in an earlier cladistic study of thecostracan and other maxillopodan taxa is not seriously affected. A comparison with the Cambrian maxillopodan Bredocarissuggests that division of the antennule into discrete articles in extant thecostracans is an apomorphic state and that yet one more apical article once existed in the maxillopodan antennule.     

Cypris larvae of acrothoracican barnacles (Thecostraca: Cirripedia: Acrothoracica)

We used SEM to investigate the morphology of the cypris larvae from a range of species of the Cirripedia Acrothoracica, representing all three families and including the first detailed account of cyprids in the highly specialized Cryptophialidae. Special attention was given to the head shield (carapace), the lattice organs, the antennules, the thoracopods, the telson and the furcal rami. The cypris larvae of the Acrothoracica fall into two morphological groups; those of the Trypetesidae and Lithoglyptidae have a well-developed carapace (head shield) that can completely enclose the body and sports fronto-lateral pores, numerous short setae and lattice organs perforated by numerous small, rounded pores and a single, conspicuous terminal pore. The fourth antennular segment has the setae arranged in subterminal and terminal groups. There is a developed thorax with natatory thoracopods and a distinct abdomen and telson. In comparison, the cyprids of the Cryptophialidae exhibit apomorphies in the morphology of the carapace, the antennules and the thorax, mostly in the form of simplifications and reductions. They have a much smaller head shield, leaving parts of the body directly exposed. The shield is conspicuously ornamented by deep pits and hexagonally arranged ridges and bears a few, very long setae but lacks fronto-lateral pores. The lattice organs have numerous elongated pores, but no large, terminal pore. The fourth antennular segment has all the setae clustered in one terminal group. The thorax and thoracopods are rudimentary and not suitable for swimming. These reductions and simplifications in morphology correlate with cryptophialid cyprids being unable to swim. They can only disperse by antennular walking resulting in small, but highly gregarious populations of adults. The variations in antennular morphology and telson structure were traced for the genera of the families Lithoglyptidae and Trypetesidae. The traditional non-cladistic taxonomy in the suborders Pygophora (Cryptophialidae+Lithoglyptidae) and Apygophora (Trypetesidae) was based largely on symplesiomorphies in adult morphology and cannot be upheld. The Lithoglyptidae and Trypetesidae may form a monophylum, but evidence remains scarce. We expect that the use of larval (cyprid) characters will in the future play an important part in more detailed phylogenetic analyses of the Acrothoracica and also shed new light on their reproductive ecology.     

Phylogeny and evolution of life history strategies of the parasitic barnacles (Crustacea, Cirripedia, Rhizocephala)

The barnacles (Crustacea, Cirripedia) consist of three well-defined orders: the conventional filter-feeding barnacles (Thoracica), the burrowing barnacles (Acrothoracica), and the parasitic barnacles (Rhizocephala). Thoracica and Acrothoracica feed by catching food particles from the surrounding seawater using their thoracic appendages while members of Rhizocephala are exclusively parasitic. The parasite consists of a sac-shaped, external reproductive organ situated on the abdomen of its crustacean host and a nutrient-absorbing root system embedded into the heamolymph of the host. In order to resolve the phylogenetic relationship of the order Rhizocephala and elucidate the evolution of the different life history strategies found within the Rhizocephala, we have performed the first comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of the group. Our results indicate that Rhizocephala is monophyletic with a filter-feeding barnacle-like ancestor. The host-infective stage, the kentrogon larva, inserted in the lifecycle of the rhizocephalan suborder, Kentrogonida, is shown to be ancestral and most likely a homologue of the juvenile stage of a conventional thoracican barnacle. The mode of host inoculation found in the suborder Akentrogonida, where the last pelagic larval stage directly injects the parasitic material into the heamolymph of the host is derived, and has evolved only once within the Rhizocephala. Lastly, our results show that the ancestral host for extant rhizocephalans appears to be the anomuran crustaceans (Anomura), which includes hermit crabs and squat lobsters.     

Isolation of highly polymorphic microsatellite markers from the intertidal barnacle Chthamalus montagui Southward

This study reports the isolation and characterization of seven highly polymorphic microsatellite loci in Chthamalus montagui (Crustacea, Cirripedia). The loci were isolated from a library constructed from genomic DNA enriched for CA repeats. The markers yielded three to 43 alleles per locus (mean 16.7) in samples averaging 49 individuals. Observed heterozygosity ranged from 0.08 to 0.58 (mean 0.39). These microsatellite loci will be valuable tools for population genetic studies of this species.     

The Morphology of the Naupliar Stages of Sacculina carcini(Crustacea: Cirripedia: Rhizocephala)

A morphological study was carried out on the fournaupliar stages of Sacculina carciniusing mainly scanning electron microscopy. Frontal horns were present and throughout development the typical nauplius limbs remained simple and gnathobases were lacking. Such features are characteristic of other lecithotrophic barnacle nauplii. The presence of a vestigial ventral thoracic process was evident on the stage III nauplius and was even more prominent on the stage IV nauplius. These observations confirm that the rhizocephalan nauplius is close to the thoracican nauplius form and lend strong support for the retention of the Rhizocephala within the Cirripedia.     

Phylogenetic implications of the Crustacean nauplius

The plesiomorphic mode of crustacean development is widely accepted to be via a larva called the nauplius. Extant taxa like the Cephalocarida, Branchiopoda, Ostracoda, Mystacocarida, Copepoda, Cirripedia, Ascothoracida, Facetotecta, Euphausiacea and Penaeidea hatch from an egg as a free-living nauplius. Other crustaceans show an embryonic phase of development suggestive of a naupliar organization. Several features of the nauplius larva have been proposed as diagnostic characters for the Crustacea: a median (nauplius) eye; at least three pairs of head appendages (antennules, antennae, mandibles); a posteriorly directed fold (the labrum) extending over the mouth and a cephalic (nauplius) shield. The relationship between trilobite protaspis with at least four appendages and the crustacean nauplius remains unclear, but reports of a copepod orthonauplius with four appendages are rejected. Swimming is suggested to represent the underived mode of locomotion for the crustacean nauplius, and that naupliar swimming directly results in naupliar feeding which also is underived.     

Tantulocarida versus Thecostraca: inside or outside? First attempts to resolve phylogenetic position of Tantulocarida using gene sequences

Complete 18S rDNA sequences of two species of the Tantulocarida Arcticotantulus pertzovi (Basipodellidae) and Microdajus tchesunovi (Microdajidae) were obtained and used for estimating the relationship of the class with other Crustacea. This constitutes the first use of tantulocaridan gene sequences, and we conclude that the Tantulocarida are very close relatives of the class Thecostraca, which comprise cirripedes, ascothoracidans and the enigmatic facetotectans. With much lower confidence, the Tantulocarida are also indicated as nested within the Thecostraca, being sister group to the Cirripedia. We therefore discuss morphological similarities and differences between tantulocaridans and the thecostracans in search of potential synapomorphies, including a possible relation to the parasitic barnacles (Rhizocephala). We conclude that the cement gland of the tantulus larva and the cirripede cyprid might be homologous structures, but that similarities in host infection and root systems between the Tantulocarida and the Rhizocephala are, on present evidence, likely to be homoplasies evolved by convergent evolution into advanced parasitism. The precise position of the Tantulocarida in relation to or within the Thecostraca must be pursued by a more extensive database of genetic markers.     

Special cutaneous receptor organs of fish. 3. The ampullary organs of Eigenmannia

Ampullary receptor organs of the South American weakly electric gymnotid fish Eigenmannia virescens consist of a pore at the surface of the skin, a canal through the epidermis, and the expanded basal end of the canal in the corium. The cavity of the organ contains a jelly that is filled with fine fibers. The canal wall consists of three to six layers of flattened cells that appear to be derived from the adjacent skin. Along the lumen of the organ the cells are joined by tight junctions. Usually there are four spherical receptor cells in the base of the organ. They are innervated by single neural terminals. These organs are compared to tuberous receptor organs found in the same species, and the functional significance of the fine structure observed in these cells is discussed.     

The evolution of the protonephridial terminal organ across Rotifera with particular emphasis on Dicranophorus forcipatus,Encentrum mucronatum and Erignatha clastopis (Rotifera: Dicranophoridae)

Riemann, O. and Ahlrichs, W.H. 2009. The evolution of the protonephridial terminal organ across Rotifera with particular emphasis on Dicranophorus forcipatus, Encentrum mucronatum and Erignatha clastopis (Rotifera: Dicranophoridae). —Acta Zoologica (Stockholm) 91 : 199–211 We report on the ultrastructure of the protonephridial terminal organ in three species of dicranophorid rotifers (Dicranophorus forcipatus, Encentrum mucronatum and Erignatha clastopis). Differences between the three species relate to shape and size, the morphology of the filter region and the number of microvilli and cilia inside the terminal organ. A comparison across Rotifera indicates that the terminal organs in D. forcipatus display a number of plesiomorphic characters, but are modified in E. mucronatum and Er. clastopis. This is in accordance with the results of phylogenetic analyses suggesting a basal position of D. forcipatus compared with the more derived species E. mucronatum and Er. clastopis. Moreover, we survey available data on the terminal organ in Rotifera and discuss its evolutionary transformations. The protonephridial terminal organ in the common ancestor of Rotifera consisted of a cytoplasmic cylinder with cilia united into a vibratile flame and a single circle of circumciliary microvilli. Depending on the topology on which characters are optimized, the site of ultrafiltration was formed by longitudinal cytoplasmic columns spanned by a fine filter diaphragm or by pores in the wall of the terminal organ. In several taxa of Rotifera, the terminal organ – probably independently – lost its circumciliary microvilli.     

Molecules and the Body Plan: TheHoxGenes of Cirripedes (Crustacea)

Among arthropods, Cirripedia (barnacles) are remarkable in that they completely lack abdominal segments. This feature prompted us to study theHoxgenes of three cirripede species, representing a wide array of the diversity of these organisms, a segmented sessile barnacle,Elminius modestus(Thoracica), the parasite of a crab,Sacculina carcini(Rhizocephala), and the burrowing barnacleTrypetesa lampas(Acrothoracica). Using PCR amplification of genomic DNA and cDNA and library probing, we have found seven clear cirripedian homologues of the eight homeoticHoxgenes known in insects, includinglabialandproboscipediahomologues, that were not previously reported in crustaceans. In addition we have isolated a divergentAntp-like gene, namedDiva, that we homologize to theftzgene of insects. The homeotic geneabdominalA(abdA) was not retrieved from any of these three cirripede species. By contrast, we have found all eight homeotic homologue genes, includingabdA, inUlophysema oeresundense, a crustacean possessing a well-developed abdomen, belonging to the Ascothoracica, generally thought to be the sister group of Cirripedia. Since we have found in barnacles homeobox-containing genes that are more divergent from theAntennapediatype than the typicalabdA, we believe that abona fide abdAgene would not have escaped our search. Hence, theabdAgene has been lost or is profoundly derived in sequence during the evolution leading to the cirripedian lineage. If confirmed, the lack ofabdAwould represent the first case in which the loss of a homeotic gene is correlated with a change in body plan during the evolution of metazoans.     

Deep phylogeny and character evolution in thecostraca (crustacea: maxillopoda)

The thecostracans include the Facetotecta, Ascothoracida, and Cirripedia and show great diversity in both morphology and biology. This makes them ideal models for studying evolutionary adaptations of the larval and adult body-plan, lifestyle, and reproduction. Surprisingly, despite all the work published since Darwin's seminal monographs, few studies have tested evolutionary hypotheses about Thecostraca within a phylogenetic context. In this review, we combine a Bayesian phylogenetic method and multilocus sequence data to reconstruct the evolutionary history of 12 key thecostracan phenotypic traits associated with their lifecycle, larval biology, reproduction, and adult morphology. Our analyses show that thecostracan biological diversity resulted both from unique innovations and from events of convergence. This provides an opportunity to reevaluate previous classifications of the Thecostraca and the theories relating to the origin and diversification of this taxon.     

Special cutaneous receptor organs of fish. IV. Ampullary organs of the nonelectric catfish, Kryptopterus

Ampullary organs of the transparent catfish, Kryptopterus bicirrhus, are present in large numbers on the head and in a regular pattern of lines on the body and fins. The organs lie in the epidermis, and have a pore that opens to the surface. Flattened cells form a roof and walls. On the floor of the organ there are a “sensory hillock,” composed of spherical receptor cells and columnar supporting cells, and a “secretory hillock” composed of columnar secretory cells. The receptor cells are nonciliated and have only afferent innervation. The organ cavity is filled with jelly. The organs are compared with ampullary organs of the weakly electric fish Eigenmannia, ampullae of Lorenzini of Raja, and small pit organs of Amiurus. Structural characteristics of the ampullary organs of Kryptopterus make them especially suitable for electrophysiological studies.