The Type II Hsp40 Sis1 Cooperates with Hsp70 and the E3 Ligase Ubr1 to Promote Degradation of Terminally Misfolded Cytosolic Protein

Mechanisms for cooperation between the cytosolic Hsp70 system and the ubiquitin proteasome system during protein triage are not clear. Herein, we identify new mechanisms for selection of misfolded cytosolic proteins for degradation via defining functional interactions between specific cytosolic Hsp70/Hsp40 pairs and quality control ubiquitin ligases. These studies revolved around the use of S. cerevisiae to elucidate the degradation pathway of a terminally misfolded reporter protein, short-lived GFP (slGFP). The Type I Hsp40 Ydj1 acts with Hsp70 to suppress slGFP aggregation. In contrast, the Type II Hsp40 Sis1 is required for proteasomal degradation of slGFP. Sis1 and Hsp70 operate sequentially with the quality control E3 ubiquitin ligase Ubr1 to target slGFP for degradation. Compromise of Sis1 or Ubr1 function leads slGFP to accumulate in a Triton X-100-soluble state with slGFP degradation intermediates being concentrated into perinuclear and peripheral puncta. Interestingly, when Sis1 activity is low the slGFP that is concentrated into puncta can be liberated from puncta and subsequently degraded. Conversely, in the absence of Ubr1, slGFP and the puncta that contain slGFP are relatively stable. Ubr1 mediates proteasomal degradation of slGFP that is released from cytosolic protein handling centers. Pathways for proteasomal degradation of misfolded cytosolic proteins involve functional interplay between Type II Hsp40/Hsp70 chaperone pairs, PQC E3 ligases, and storage depots for misfolded proteins.     

The cytoplasmic Hsp70 chaperone machinery subjects misfolded and endoplasmic reticulum import-incompetent proteins to degradation via the ubiquitin-proteasome system

The mechanism of protein quality control and elimination of misfolded proteins in the cytoplasm is poorly understood. We studied the involvement of cytoplasmic factors required for degradation of two endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-import-defective mutated derivatives of carboxypeptidase yscY (DeltassCPY* and DeltassCPY*-GFP) and also examined the requirements for degradation of the corresponding wild-type enzyme made ER-import incompetent by removal of its signal sequence (DeltassCPY). All these protein species are rapidly degraded via the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Degradation requires the ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes Ubc4p and Ubc5p, the cytoplasmic Hsp70 Ssa chaperone machinery, and the Hsp70 cochaperone Ydj1p. Neither the Hsp90 chaperones nor Hsp104 or the small heat-shock proteins Hsp26 and Hsp42 are involved in the degradation process. Elimination of a GFP fusion (GFP-cODC), containing the C-terminal 37 amino acids of ornithine decarboxylase (cODC) directing this enzyme to the proteasome, is independent of Ssa1p function. Fusion of DeltassCPY* to GFP-cODC to form DeltassCPY*-GFP-cODC reimposes a dependency on the Ssa1p chaperone for degradation. Evidently, the misfolded protein domain dictates the route of protein elimination. These data and our further results give evidence that the Ssa1p-Ydj1p machinery recognizes misfolded protein domains, keeps misfolded proteins soluble, solubilizes precipitated protein material, and escorts and delivers misfolded proteins in the ubiquitinated state to the proteasome for degradation.     

Absence of the Yeast Hsp31 Chaperones of the DJ-1 Superfamily Perturbs Cytoplasmic Protein Quality Control in Late Growth Phase

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae heat shock proteins Hsp31, Hsp32, Hsp33 and Hsp34 belong to the DJ-1/ThiJ/PfpI superfamily which includes the human protein DJ-1 (PARK7) as the most prominent member. Mutations in the DJ-1 gene are directly linked to autosomal recessive, early-onset Parkinson’s disease. DJ-1 acts as an oxidative stress-induced chaperone preventing aggregation and fibrillation of α-synuclein, a critical factor in the development of the disease. In vivo assays in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using the model substrate ΔssCPY*Leu2myc (ΔssCL*myc) as an aggregation-prone misfolded cytoplasmic protein revealed an influence of the Hsp31 chaperone family on the steady state level of this substrate. In contrast to the ubiquitin ligase of the N-end rule pathway Ubr1, which is known to be prominently involved in the degradation process of misfolded cytoplasmic proteins, the absence of the Hsp31 chaperone family does not impair the degradation of newly synthesized misfolded substrate. Also degradation of substrates with strong affinity to Ubr1 like those containing the type 1 N-degron arginine is not affected by the absence of the Hsp31 chaperone family. Epistasis analysis indicates that one function of the Hsp31 chaperone family resides in a pathway overlapping with the Ubr1-dependent degradation of misfolded cytoplasmic proteins. This pathway gains relevance in late growth phase under conditions of nutrient limitation. Additionally, the Hsp31 chaperones seem to be important for maintaining the cellular Ssa Hsp70 activity which is important for Ubr1-dependent degradation.     

System-wide Analysis Reveals Intrinsically Disordered Proteins Are Prone to Ubiquitylation after Misfolding Stress

Damaged and misfolded proteins that are no longer functional in the cell need to be eliminated. Failure to do so might lead to their accumulation and aggregation, a hallmark of many neurodegenerative diseases. Protein quality control pathways play a major role in the degradation of these proteins, which is mediated mainly by the ubiquitin proteasome system. Despite significant focus on identifying ubiquitin ligases involved in these pathways, along with their substrates, a systems-level understanding of these pathways has been lacking. For instance, as misfolded proteins are rapidly ubiquitylated, unconjugated ubiquitin is rapidly depleted from the cell upon misfolding stress; yet it is unknown whether certain targets compete more efficiently to be ubiquitylated. Using a system-wide approach, we applied statistical and computational methods to identify characteristics enriched among proteins that are further ubiquitylated after heat shock. We discovered that distinct populations of structured and, surprisingly, intrinsically disordered proteins are prone to ubiquitylation. Proteomic analysis revealed that abundant and highly structured proteins constitute the bulk of proteins in the low-solubility fraction after heat shock, but only a portion is ubiquitylated. In contrast, ubiquitylated, intrinsically disordered proteins are enriched in the low-solubility fraction after heat shock. These proteins have a very low abundance in the cell, are rarely encoded by essential genes, and are enriched in binding motifs. In additional experiments, we confirmed that several of the identified intrinsically disordered proteins were ubiquitylated after heat shock and demonstrated for two of them that their disordered regions are important for ubiquitylation after heat shock. We propose that intrinsically disordered regions may be recognized by the protein quality control machinery and thereby facilitate the ubiquitylation of proteins after heat shock.Cells face the constant threat of protein misfolding and aggregation, and thus protein quality control pathways are important in selectively targeting damaged and misfolded proteins for degradation (1, 2). The ubiquitin proteasome system serves as a major mediator of this pathway by conjugating the small protein ubiquitin onto substrates through the E1-E2-E3 (ubiquitin-activating enzyme, ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme, and ubiquitin ligase, respectively) cascade for their recognition and degradation by the proteasome (3, 4). It is known that the activity of the ubiquitin-proteasome system is associated with many neurodegenerative diseases. For instance, ubiquitin is found enriched in protein inclusions associated with these diseases (5). Furthermore, proteasome activity has been shown to decrease with age in a large variety of organisms (6), leading to increased proteotoxicity in the cell.Because of the importance of maintaining protein homeostasis, numerous ubiquitin ligases in different cellular compartments function in protein quality control pathways to target misfolded or damaged proteins for degradation via the proteasome. For instance, the conserved Hrd1 ubiquitin ligase is involved in the endoplasmic-reticulum-associated degradation pathway that targets endoplasmic reticulum proteins for retro-translocation to the cytoplasm and proteasome degradation (7). A major question is what features are recognized by ubiquitin ligases that allow them to selectively target terminally misfolded proteins for degradation, given that the folding rates and physicochemical properties vary largely from protein to protein. Several E3 ubiquitin ligases involved in cytosolic protein quality control target their substrates via their interactions with chaperone proteins. For instance, the CHIP ubiquitin ligase can directly bind to Hsp70 and Hsp90 proteins (8), which may hand over client proteins that are not successfully folded. Understanding which features are recognized by these degradation quality-control pathways might help us understand how certain misfolded proteins evade this system, leading to their accumulation and aggregation in the cell.Many studies investigating degradation protein quality control have employed model substrates (e.g. mutated proteins that misfold) to reveal which components are involved in a given quality control machinery. However, these approaches do not typically reveal the whole spectrum of substrates for these pathways. Thus, alternative system-wide approaches are also needed to provide a bigger picture. Heat shock (HS)¹ induces general misfolding at the proteome level by increasing thermal energy and was shown to cause an increase in ubiquitylation levels in the cell over 25 years ago (9, 10). However, the exact mechanism and pathways that target misfolded proteins have remained uncharacterized for a long time. We recently showed that the Hul5 ubiquitin ligase plays a major role in this heat stress response that mainly affects cytosolic proteins (11). Absence of Hul5 averts the ubiquitylation in the cytoplasm of several misfolded targets after HS, as well as low-solubility proteins in unstressed cells. Other E3 ubiquitin ligases are likely involved in this pathway (12). Interestingly, as ubiquitin constitutes about only 1% of the proteome, free unconjugated ubiquitin is rapidly depleted under stress conditions (13, 14). Given the limited amount of this protein, how does the cell triage ubiquitin among an excess of misfolded proteins? In order to gain systems-level insight, we sought to identify characteristics enriched among proteins ubiquitylated after HS using a combination of statistical and computational analysis, and we conducted additional proteomics and biochemical experiments to support our hypotheses. We discovered an unexpected susceptibility of intrinsically disordered proteins for ubiquitylation after misfolding stress.     

Exchangeable chaperone modules contribute to specification of type I and type II Hsp40 cellular function

Hsp40 family members regulate Hsp70s ability to bind nonnative polypeptides and thereby play an essential role in cell physiology. Type I and type II Hsp40s, such as yeast Ydj1 and Sis1, form chaperone pairs with cytosolic Hsp70 Ssa1 that fold proteins with different efficiencies and carry out specific cellular functions. The mechanism by which Ydj1 and Sis1 specify Hsp70 functions is not clear. Ydj1 and Sis1 share a high degree of sequence identity in their amino and carboxyl terminal ends, but each contains a structurally unique and centrally located protein module that is implicated in chaperone function. To test whether the chaperone modules of Ydj1 and Sis1 function in the specification of Hsp70 action, we constructed a set of chimeric Hsp40s in which the chaperone domains of Ydj1 and Sis1 were swapped to form YSY and SYS. Purified SYS and YSY exhibited protein-folding activity and substrate specificity that mimicked that of Ydj1 and Sis1, respectively. In in vivo studies, YSY exhibited a gain of function and, unlike Ydj1, could complement the lethal phenotype of sis1 Delta and facilitate maintenance of the prion [RNQ+]. Ydj1 and Sis1 contain exchangeable chaperone modules that assist in specification of Hsp70 function.     

Cooperation of a ubiquitin domain protein and an E3 ubiquitin ligase during chaperone/proteasome coupling.

BACKGROUND: Molecular chaperones recognize nonnative proteins and orchestrate cellular folding processes in conjunction with regulatory cofactors. However, not every attempt to fold a protein is successful, and misfolded proteins can be directed to the cellular degradation machinery for destruction. Molecular mechanisms underlying the cooperation of molecular chaperones with the degradation machinery remain largely enigmatic so far. RESULTS: By characterizing the chaperone cofactors BAG-1 and CHIP, we gained insight into the cooperation of the molecular chaperones Hsc70 and Hsp70 with the ubiquitin/proteasome system, a major system for protein degradation in eukaryotic cells. The cofactor CHIP acts as a ubiquitin ligase in the ubiquitination of chaperone substrates such as the raf-1 protein kinase and the glucocorticoid hormone receptor. During targeting of signaling molecules to the proteasome, CHIP may cooperate with BAG-1, a ubiquitin domain protein previously shown to act as a coupling factor between Hsc/Hsp70 and the proteasome. BAG-1 directly interacts with CHIP; it accepts substrates from Hsc/Hsp70 and presents associated proteins to the CHIP ubiquitin conjugation machinery. Consequently, BAG-1 promotes CHIP-induced degradation of the glucocorticoid hormone receptor in vivo. CONCLUSIONS: The ubiquitin domain protein BAG-1 and the CHIP ubiquitin ligase can cooperate to shift the activity of the Hsc/Hsp70 chaperone system from protein folding to degradation. The chaperone cofactors thus act as key regulators to influence protein quality control.     

Identification of essential residues in the type II Hsp40 Sis1 that function in polypeptide binding

Sis1 is an essential yeast Type II Hsp40 protein that assists cytosolic Hsp70 Ssa1 in the facilitation of processes that include translation initiation, the prevention of protein aggregation, and proteasomal protein degradation. An essential function of Sis1 and other Hsp40 proteins is the binding and delivery of non-native polypeptides to Hsp70. How Hsp40s function as molecular chaperones is unknown. The crystal structure of a Sis1 fragment that retains peptide-binding activity suggests that Type II Hsp40s utilize hydrophobic residues located in a solvent-exposed patch on carboxyl-terminal domain I to bind non-native polypeptides. To test this model, amino acid residues Val-184, Leu-186, Lys-199, Phe-201, Ile-203, and Phe-251, which form a depression in carboxyl-terminal domain I, were mutated, and the ability of Sis1 mutants to support cell viability and function as molecular chaperones was examined. We report that Lys-199, Phe-201, and Phe-251 are essential for cell viability and required for Sis1 polypeptide binding activity. Sis1 I203T could support normal cell growth, but when purified it exhibited severe defects in chaperone function. These data identify essential residues in Sis1 that function in polypeptide binding and help define the nature of the polypeptide-binding site in Type II Hsp40 proteins.     

Hsp70 chaperones as modulators of prion life cycle: novel effects of Ssa and Ssb on the Saccharomyces cerevisiae prion [PSI+

[PSI(+)] is a prion isoform of the yeast release factor Sup35. In some assays, the cytosolic chaperones Ssa1 and Ssb1/2 of the Hsp70 family were previously shown to exhibit "pro-[PSI(+)]" and "anti-[PSI(+)]" effects, respectively. Here, it is demonstrated for the first time that excess Ssa1 increases de novo formation of [PSI(+)] and that pro-[PSI(+)] effects of Ssa1 are shared by all other Ssa proteins. Experiments with chimeric constructs show that the peptide-binding domain is a major determinant of differences in the effects of Ssa and Ssb proteins on [PSI(+)]. Surprisingly, overproduction of either chaperone increases loss of [PSI(+)] when Sup35 is simultaneously overproduced. Excess Ssa increases both the average size of prion polymers and the proportion of monomeric Sup35 protein. Both in vivo and in vitro experiments uncover direct physical interactions between Sup35 and Hsp70 proteins. The proposed model postulates that Ssa stimulates prion formation and polymer growth by stabilizing misfolded proteins, which serve as substrates for prion conversion. In the case of very large prion aggregates, further increase in size may lead to the loss of prion activity. In contrast, Ssb either stimulates refolding into nonprion conformation or targets misfolded proteins for degradation, in this way counteracting prion formation and propagation.     

Ubiquitin versus misfolding: The minimal requirements for inclusion body formation

Ubiquitin-containing inclusion bodies are characteristic features of numerous neurodegenerative diseases, but whether ubiquitin plays a functional role in the formation of these protein deposits is unclear. In this issue, Bersuker et al. (2016. J. Cell Biol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201511024) report that protein misfolding without ubiquitylation is sufficient for translocation into inclusion bodies.A large number of sporadic and familial neurodegenerative diseases that differ in their age of onset and manifestation share striking pathological features at the cellular level, suggesting that a common etiology may be responsible for the demise of neurons. Most notable is the aggregation of improperly folded proteins in affected neurons in these so-called protein misfolding diseases that include Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, as well as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and other motor neuron diseases. Protein aggregates are inherently toxic for cells, underscoring their candidate status as a common denominator in these diseases (Bucciantini et al., 2002). A causative role for aberrant protein conformations is further strengthened by the existence of a family of rare, inheritable neurodegenerative disorders, which are a direct consequence of expansions of polyglutamine repeats that render the mutant proteins prone to aggregation. Given that neuronal cells often must last an organism’s lifetime with little opportunity to dilute protein waste through cell division, it is not hard to imagine that they are particularly susceptible to the gradual accumulation of aberrant proteins that favor precipitation in insoluble protein aggregates.Neurons and other cells have three major lines of defense to minimize the damage that aggregation-prone proteins can cause to cellular homeostasis (Fig. 1). The first two are based on a seek-and-destroy strategy in which the two main intracellular proteolytic systems play complementary roles. Although monomeric aberrant proteins are efficiently targeted for hydrolysis in proteasomes, these proteolytic complexes are unable to process oligomeric protein aggregates (Verhoef et al., 2002). Destruction of proteins in proteasomes requires complete unfolding of the deemed proteins, which may be hard, if not impossible, in the case of tightly associated misfolded proteins. Macroautophagy, however, is a proteolytic pathway that is able to process oligomeric misfolded proteins, as it involves the capturing of cytosolic constituents, including macromolecular complexes like protein aggregates, in double-membrane vesicles that fuse with lysosomes (Ravikumar et al., 2004). As such, macroautophagy complements proteasomal degradation in keeping the cellular environment free from toxic protein species.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Three lines of defense against misfolded proteins. There are three protective mechanisms that are involved in minimizing the toxicity of misfolded proteins: proteasomal degradation (I), macroautophagic clearance (II), and inclusion body formation (III). Ubiquitin is linked to each of these processes, as it can target proteins for proteasomal and macroautophagosomal degradation and is enriched in inclusion bodies.In the unfortunate case that the production of aggregation-prone proteins exceeds the capacity of both the proteasomal and lysosomal systems, a potential catastrophic situation arises as misfolded proteins may precipitate in large, insoluble aggregates. In these cases, a third protective mechanism can come to the rescue and primarily provides damage control, as it intercepts protein aggregates and sequesters them in dedicated subcellular structures, thereby minimizing the harm that the aberrant proteins may cause (Johnston et al., 1998). It is this process that is responsible for the formation of the characteristic inclusion bodies that are typically observed in affected neurons and known under different names depending on the neurodegenerative disorder in which they occur, such as Lewy bodies in Parkinson’s disease, Bunina bodies in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and intranuclear inclusions in several polyglutamine disorders (Alves-Rodrigues et al., 1998). Although these structures were originally considered as a potential cause for the cellular pathology, a large body of evidence suggests that they actually lessen the cellular damage caused by toxic proteins (Arrasate et al., 2004). Although their presence may not be without negative consequence for the cells, the controlled formation of waste deposits may be the best possible option for the cell when facing excessive amounts of aggregated proteins.Interestingly, the protein modifier ubiquitin, a posttranslational modification covalently linked to lysine residues of target proteins, appears to be somehow involved in each of these three protective mechanisms. Polyubiquitylation, or conjugation of a chain of ubiquitin molecules, targets proteins for proteasomal degradation and is likewise also critical for proteasomal destruction of misfolded proteins (Kleiger and Mayor, 2014). Even though macroautophagy was originally seen as a nonselective catabolic pathway, more recent studies have suggested that it also involves a high level of specificity with ubiquitin chains being an important substrate recruitment signal (Kraft et al., 2010). In sharp contrast to the well-defined targeting function of ubiquitin in these proteolytic mechanisms, its possible role in the formation of inclusion bodies has been less clear. This is somewhat ironic, given that the initial observations of ubiquitin-positive inclusions in neurodegeneration date back almost three decades (Mori et al., 1987) and have been among the main findings that sparked the interest in a possible role of dysfunctional ubiquitin-dependent proteasomal degradation in neurodegenerative disorders (Cummings et al., 1998). In this issue, Bersuker et al. revisited this important question using an elegant system that allowed them to follow specifically designed reporter proteins that could be switched from folded to misfolded states by administration of cell-permeable ligands. Using this approach, they confirmed that introducing a misfolded state resulted in rapid clearance of the reporter proteins by ubiquitin-dependent proteasomal degradation, the first line of defense against misfolded proteins. Consistent with the prevailing model, they also found that the misfolded reporters accumulated in inclusion bodies when they increased the load of aggregation-prone proteins by simultaneously expressing a fragment of mutant huntingtin containing an expanded polyglutamine repeat, the protein responsible for Huntington’s disease. Interestingly, chemical inhibition of the ubiquitin activase, an enzyme that is critical for ubiquitin conjugation, showed that translocation of the reporter proteins to inclusion bodies did not require ubiquitylation, arguing that the misfolded state is sufficient to reach the final destination.If ubiquitin is not needed for targeting misfolded proteins to inclusion bodies, why then do these proteinaceous deposits contain such large amounts of ubiquitin? The fact that ubiquitin is not required for the recruitment of misfolded proteins to inclusion bodies does not exclude the possibility that ubiquitylation targets properly folded proteins to inclusion bodies. Thus, a possible scenario is that inclusion bodies, once they have been seeded by the ubiquitin-independent sequestration of misfolded proteins, will start to gather soluble polyubiquitylated proteins that typically accumulate under conditions of disturbed protein homeostasis. The authors investigated this possibility by expressing a reporter substrate that contained a degradation signal and was therefore efficiently targeted for ubiquitin-dependent proteasomal degradation. Interestingly, even though these substrates accumulated in a ubiquitylated form when proteasomal degradation was obstructed, they did not localize to the inclusion bodies that otherwise gathered misfolded reporters. This suggests that ubiquitin chains—at least those that target substrates for proteasomal degradation—are not sufficient to autonomously target proteins to inclusion bodies and, at the same time, excludes the possibility that their presence is due to a general sequestration of ubiquitylated proteasome substrates.Alternatively, ubiquitin in inclusions may reflect an attempt of the cell to get rid of the sequestrated protein aggregates once they have reached the inclusion body by targeting them for destruction via ubiquitin-dependent proteolytic systems. Indeed, in vivo studies suggest that inclusion bodies are not a dead-end product but can be cleared from affected neurons (Yamamoto et al., 2000). Even though ubiquitin-dependent autophagosomal and proteasomal degradation are primary candidates for facilitating disposal of inclusions (Martín-Aparicio et al., 2001; Wong et al., 2008), it should be noted that it is presently unclear how this would be mechanistically executed. The data presented by Bersuker et al. (2016) show that the pool of ubiquitin in inclusion bodies is rather static, arguing against a direct role in the turnover, if any, of the ubiquitylated proteins present in the inclusions.Where do these findings leave us? It is fair to say that the functional significance of ubiquitin in inclusion bodies remains somewhat elusive. Following the road of exclusion as in the present study, we can put a solid strike through several trivial explanations for the presence of ubiquitin in inclusions, but further research will be needed to get a more definitive answer about ubiquitin’s role in this process or the lack thereof. It also brings up questions about the role of the microtubule-associated deacetylase HDAC6 in this process. Some studies have provided data that support an essential role for this cytosolic deacetylase in transporting aggregates to inclusions by virtue of its ability to simultaneously bind ubiquitin conjugates and the dynein motors that are required for their sequestration (Kawaguchi et al., 2003; Olzmann et al., 2007). However, HDAC6 has also been linked to degradation of aggregation-prone proteins by macroautophagy, suggesting that it may indirectly influence the kinetics of inclusion body formation (Pandey et al., 2007; Lee et al., 2010). Even though these processes are not mutually exclusive and may well be functionally linked, the present findings motivate a closer look at the molecular mechanisms that link HDAC6 to the formation of inclusion bodies. It should be noted that although the presented data demonstrate that the canonical ubiquitin chains that target proteins for proteasomal degradation are insufficient to promote their translocation to inclusion bodies, it does not exclude implication of alternative ubiquitin chains. Ubiquitin modifications come in many different flavors, and, in particular, the K63-linked polyubiquitin chains, which do not target for proteasomal degradation, have been linked to both macroautophagy and inclusion body formation (Lim and Lim, 2011).The present work also underscores the importance of the exclusive role of protein aggregation in directing misfolded proteins to inclusion bodies. This finding resonates with an earlier study from the same group, in which they reported that targeting of misfolded proteins for autophagy is a direct consequence of their aggregation and does not necessarily require ubiquitylation (Riley et al., 2010). A picture starts to emerge of a general strategy in which the attention of these protective mechanisms is directly drawn to the problematic proteins by the very same virtue that causes their misbehavior, namely their tendency to aggregate. The central role of protein aggregation, as opposed to ubiquitylation, may also be relevant for the similarities and dissimilarities between the formation of inclusion bodies in the cytosolic and nuclear compartments of cells. Whereas the present study probes into the role of ubiquitin in the generation of cytosolic inclusions, intranuclear inclusions are most notoriously associated with the pathology of neurodegenerative diseases. Even though there are fundamental differences in ubiquitin targeting and transport mechanisms between these compartments, the intrinsic property of the proteins to aggregate applies to both, and it is also feasible that in the nucleus, the misfolded domains suffice to facilitate their translocation to inclusion bodies. The lack of a need for a middleman in this critical process may reflect the archaic nature of this innate response and allow rapid incapacitation of these inherently toxic species. This will also ensure that handling of these proteins is not susceptible to disturbed ubiquitin homeostasis, as often is the case in neurodegenerative disorders.     

Crystal structure of yeast Sis1 peptide-binding fragment and Hsp70 Ssa1 C-terminal complex

Heat shock protein (Hsp) 40 facilitates the critical role of Hsp70 in a number of cellular processes such as protein folding, assembly, degradation and translocation in vivo. Hsp40 and Hsp70 stay in close contact to achieve these diverse functions. The conserved C-terminal EEVD motif in Hsp70 has been shown to regulate Hsp40-Hsp70 interaction by an unknown mechanism. Here, we provide a structural basis for this regulation by determining the crystal structure of yeast Hsp40 Sis1 peptide-binding fragment complexed with the Hsp70 Ssa1 C-terminal. The Ssa1 extreme C-terminal eight residues, G634PTVEEVD641, form a beta-strand with the domain I of Sis1 peptide-binding fragment. Surprisingly, the Ssa1 C-terminal binds Sis1 at the site where Sis1 interacts with the non-native polypeptides. The negatively charged residues within the EEVD motif in Ssa1 C-terminal form extensive charge-charge interactions with the positively charged residues in Sis1. The structure-based mutagenesis data support the structural observations.     

Chaperone functions of the E3 ubiquitin ligase CHIP

The carboxyl terminus of the Hsc70-interacting protein (CHIP) is an Hsp70 co-chaperone as well as an E3 ubiquitin ligase that protects cells from proteotoxic stress. The abilities of CHIP to interact with Hsp70 and function as a ubiquitin ligase place CHIP at a pivotal position in the protein quality control system, where its entrance into Hsp70-substrate complexes partitions nonnative proteins toward degradation. However, the manner by which Hsp70 substrates are selected for ubiquitination by CHIP is not well understood. We discovered that CHIP possesses an intrinsic chaperone activity that enables it to selectively recognize and bind nonnative proteins. Interestingly, the chaperone function of CHIP is temperature-sensitive and is dramatically enhanced by heat stress. The ability of CHIP to recognize nonnative protein structure may aid in selection of slow folding or misfolded polypeptides for ubiquitination.     

Hsp70 Targets a Cytoplasmic Quality Control Substrate to the San1p Ubiquitin Ligase

Accumulation of misfolded proteins in cellular compartments can result in stress-induced cell death. In the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), ER-associated degradation clears aberrant proteins from the secretory pathway. In the cytoplasm and nucleus, this job is left to the cytoplasmic quality control (CytoQC) machinery. Both processes utilize chaperones and the ubiquitin-proteasome system to aid in protein elimination. Previous studies in yeast have drawn comparisons between these processes using data from structurally and topologically different substrates. We sought to draw a direct comparison between ERAD and CytoQC by studying the elimination of a single misfolded domain that, depending on its residence, is disposed by either of these pathways. The truncated, second nucleotide binding domain (NBD2*) from a yeast ERAD substrate, Ste6p*, resides at the cytoplasmic face of the ER. We show that a soluble form of NBD2* is cytoplasmic and unlike wild-type NBD2 is targeted for proteasome-mediated degradation. In contrast to Ste6p*, which employs the ER-localized Doa10p ubiquitin ligase, NBD2* is ubiquitinated by a nuclear E3 ligase San1p, a factor that is also required for its degradation. Although the yeast cytoplasmic Hsp70 chaperone, Ssa1p, has been thought to facilitate the nuclear import or to maintain the solubility of most CytoQC substrates, we discovered that Ssa1p facilitates the interaction between San1p and NBD2*, demonstrating that chaperones can aid in substrate recognition and San1p-dependent protein degradation. These results emphasize the diverse action of molecular chaperones during CytoQC.     

Protein quality control: U-box-containing E3 ubiquitin ligases join the fold

Molecular chaperones act with folding co-chaperones to suppress protein aggregation and refold stress damaged proteins. However, it is not clear how slowly folding or misfolded polypeptides are targeted for proteasomal degradation. Generally, selection of proteins for degradation is mediated by E3 ubiquitin ligases of the mechanistically distinct HECT and RING domain sub-types. Recent studies suggest that the U-box protein family represents a third class of E3 enzymes. CHIP, a U-box-containing protein, is a degradatory co-chaperone of heat-shock protein 70 (Hsp70) and Hsp90 that facilitates the polyubiquitination of chaperone substrates. These data indicate a model for protein quality control in which the interaction of Hsp70 and Hsp90 with co-chaperones that have either folding or degradatory activity helps to determine the fate of non-native cellular proteins.     

Hsp70 clears misfolded kinases that partitioned into distinct quality-control compartments

Hsp70 aids in protein folding and directs misfolded proteins to the cellular degradation machinery. We describe discrete roles of Hsp70,SSA1 as an important quality-control machinery that switches functions to ameliorate the cellular environment. SSA1 facilitates folding/maturation of newly synthesized protein kinases by aiding their phosphorylation process and also stimulates ubiquitylation and degradation of kinases in regular protein turnover or during stress when kinases are denatured or improperly folded. Significantly, while kinases accumulate as insoluble inclusions upon SSA1 inhibition, they form soluble inclusions upon Hsp90 inhibition or stress foci during heat stress. This suggests formation of inclusion-specific quality-control compartments under various stress conditions. Up-regulation of SSA1 results in complete removal of these inclusions by the proteasome. Elevation of the cellular SSA1 level accelerates kinase turnover and protects cells from proteotoxic stress. Upon overexpression, SSA1 targets heat-denatured kinases toward degradation, which could enable them to recover their functional state under physiological conditions. Thus active participation of SSA1 in the degradation of misfolded proteins establishes an essential role of Hsp70 in deciding client fate during stress.     

UCH-L1 aggresome formation in response to proteasome impairment indicates a role in inclusion formation in Parkinson's disease

Aggresomes are associated with many neurodegenerative disorders, including Parkinson's disease, and polyglutamine disorders such as Huntington's disease. These inclusions commonly contain ubiquitylated proteins. The stage at which these proteins are ubiquitylated remains unclear. A malfunction of the ubiquitin/proteasome system (UPS) may be associated with their formation. Conversely, it may reflect an unsuccessful attempt by the cell to remove them. Previously, we demonstrated that overexpression of Parkin, a ubiquitin-protein ligase associated with autosomal recessive juvenile Parkinsonism, generates aggresome-like inclusions in UPS compromised cells. Mutations in the de-ubiquitylating enzyme, UCH-L1, cause a rare form of Parkinsonism. We now demonstrate that overexpression of UCH-L1 also forms ribbon-like aggresomes in response to proteasomal inhibition. Disease-associated mutations, which affect enzymatic activities, significantly increased the number of inclusions. UCH-L1 aggresomes co-localized with ubiquitylated proteins, HSP70, gamma-tubulin and, to a lesser extent, the 20S proteasome and the chaperone BiP. Similar to Parkin inclusions, we found UCH-L1 aggresomes to be surrounded by a tubulin rather than a vimentin cage-like structure. Furthermore, UCH-L1 aggregates with Parkin and alpha-synuclein in some, but not all inclusions, suggesting the heterogeneous nature of these inclusion bodies. This study provides additional evidence that aggregation-prone proteins are likely to recruit UPS components in an attempt to clear proteins from failing proteasomes. Furthermore, UCH-L1 accumulation is likely to play a pathological role in inclusion formation in Parkinson's disease.     

Chaperone-mediated 26S Proteasome Remodeling Facilitates Free K63 Ubiquitin Chain Production and Aggresome Clearance

Efficient elimination of misfolded proteins by the proteasome system is critical for proteostasis. Inadequate proteasome capacity can lead to aberrant aggregation of misfolded proteins and inclusion body formation, a hallmark of neurodegenerative disease. The proteasome system cannot degrade aggregated proteins; however, it stimulates autophagy-dependent aggregate clearance by producing unanchored lysine (K)63-linked ubiquitin chains via the proteasomal deubiquitinating enzyme Poh1. The canonical function of Poh1, which removes ubiquitin chains en bloc from proteasomal substrates prior to their degradation, requires intact 26S proteasomes. Here we present evidence that during aggresome clearance, 20S proteasomes dissociate from protein aggregates, while Poh1 and selective subunits of 19S proteasomes are retained. The dissociation of 20S proteasome components requires the molecular chaperone Hsp90. Hsp90 inhibition suppresses 26S proteasome remodeling, unanchored ubiquitin chain production, and aggresome clearance. Our results suggest that 26S proteasomes undergo active remodeling to generate a Poh1-dependent K63-deubiquitinating enzyme to facilitate protein aggregate clearance.     

A Nucleus-based Quality Control Mechanism for Cytosolic Proteins

Intracellular quality control systems monitor protein conformational states. Irreversibly misfolded proteins are cleared through specialized degradation pathways. Their importance is underscored by numerous pathologies caused by aberrant proteins. In the cytosol, where most proteins are synthesized, quality control remains poorly understood. Stress-inducible chaperones and the 26S proteasome are known mediators but how their activities are linked is unclear. To better understand these mechanisms, a panel of model misfolded substrates was analyzed in detail. Surprisingly, their degradation occurs not in the cytosol but in the nucleus. Degradation is dependent on the E3 ubiquitin ligase San1p, known previously to direct the turnover of damaged nuclear proteins. A second E3 enzyme, Ubr1p, augments this activity but is insufficient by itself. San1p and Ubr1p are not required for nuclear import of substrates. Instead, the Hsp70 chaperone system is needed for efficient import and degradation. These data reveal a new function of the nucleus as a compartment central to the quality control of cytosolic proteins.     

Regulation of the cytoplasmic quality control protein degradation pathway by BAG2

The cytoplasm is protected against the perils of protein misfolding by two mechanisms: molecular chaperones (which facilitate proper folding) and the ubiquitin-proteasome system, which regulates degradation of misfolded proteins. CHIP (carboxyl terminus of Hsp70-interacting protein) is an Hsp70-associated ubiquitin ligase that participates in this process by ubiquitylating misfolded proteins associated with cytoplasmic chaperones. Mechanisms that regulate the activity of CHIP are, at present, poorly understood. Using a proteomics approach, we have identified BAG2, a previously uncharacterized BAG domain-containing protein, as a common component of CHIP holocomplexes in vivo. Binding assays indicate that BAG2 associates with CHIP as part of a ternary complex with Hsc70, and BAG2 colocalizes with CHIP under both quiescent conditions and after heat shock. In vitro and in vivo ubiquitylation assays indicate that BAG2 is an efficient and specific inhibitor of CHIP-dependent ubiquitin ligase activity. This activity is due, in part, to inhibition of interactions between CHIP and its cognate ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme, UbcH5a, which may in turn be facilitated by ATP-dependent remodeling of the BAG2-Hsc70-CHIP heterocomplex. The association of BAG2 with CHIP provides a cochaperone-dependent regulatory mechanism for preventing unregulated ubiquitylation of misfolded proteins by CHIP.     

The co-chaperone CHIP regulates protein triage decisions mediated by heat-shock proteins

To maintain quality control in cells, mechanisms distinguish among improperly folded peptides, mature and functional proteins, and proteins to be targeted for degradation. The molecular chaperones, including heat-shock protein Hsp90, have the ability to recognize misfolded proteins and assist in their conversion to a functional conformation. Disruption of Hsp90 heterocomplexes by the Hsp90 inhibitor geldanamycin leads to substrate degradation through the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, implicating this system in protein triage decisions. We previously identified CHIP (carboxyl terminus of Hsc70-interacting protein) to be an interaction partner of Hsc70 (ref. 4). CHIP also interacts directly with a tetratricopeptide repeat acceptor site of Hsp90, incorporating into Hsp90 heterocomplexes and eliciting release of the regulatory cofactor p23. Here we show that CHIP abolishes the steroid-binding activity and transactivation potential of the glucocorticoid receptor, a well-characterized Hsp90 substrate, even though it has little effect on its synthesis. Instead, CHIP induces ubiquitylation of the glucocorticoid receptor and degradation through the proteasome. By remodelling Hsp90 heterocomplexes to favour substrate degradation, CHIP modulates protein triage decisions that regulate the balance between protein folding and degradation for chaperone substrates.