The meiotic pairing of nine wheat chromosomes

Summary The meiotic identification of nine pairs of chromosomes at metaphase I of meiosis of Triticum aestivum (B genome, 4A and 7A) has been achieved using a Giemsa C-banding technique. As a result, the analysis of the pairing of each chromosome arm in disomic and monosomic intervarietal hybrids between Chinese Spring and the Spanish cultivar Pané 247 could be carried out. Differences in the chiasmata frequencies per chromosome arm cannot be explained on the basis of relative arm lengths only. Possible effects of arm-to-arm heterochromatic differences on meiotic pairing are discussed.     

Changing partners: moving from non-homologous to homologous centromere pairing in meiosis

Reports of centromere pairing in early meiotic cells have appeared sporadically over the past thirty years. Recent experiments demonstrate that early centromere pairing occurs between non-homologous centromeres. As meiosis proceeds, centromeres change partners, becoming arranged in homologous pairs. Investigations of these later centromere pairs indicate that paired homologous centromeres are actively associated rather than positioned passively, side-by-side. Meiotic centromere pairing has been observed in organisms as diverse as mice, wheat and yeast, indicating that non-homologous centromere pairing in early meiosis and active homologous centromere pairing in later meiosis might be themes in meiotic chromosome behavior. Moreover, such pairing could have previously unrecognized roles in mediating chromosome organization or architecture that impact meiotic segregation fidelity.     

Chromosome pairing in meiosis of partially fertile wheat/rye hybrids

The normal course of meiosis depends on regular pairing of homologous chromosomes. In intergeneric hybrids, including those of wheat, there is no chromosome pairing because there are no homologs. In F₁ wheat/rye hybrids, pairing is largely prevented by the pairing homoeologous1 (Ph1) gene. In its presence, there are only rare instances of pairing; most chromosomes are univalent, and their orientation at metaphase I initiates different pathways of the meiotic cycle. The meiotic-like pathway includes a combination of the reductional and the equational + reductional steps at AI followed by the second division. The resulting gametes are mostly non-functional. The mitotic-like pathway involves equational division of univalents at AI and the absence of the second division. Any fertility of wheat/rye hybrids depends on the production of unreduced gametes arising from meiotic restitution (mitotic-like division). We examined the meiotic pairing in wheat/rye hybrids created from wheat lines with single rye chromosome substitutions and Ph1 present. This guaranteed F₁ meiosis with one pair of rye homologs. All hybrids formed bivalents, but proportions of meiocytes with bivalents varied. In the meiocytes where bivalents were present, there was a higher tendency for the meiotic-like pathway, while in meiocytes where bivalent pairing failed, the tendency was stronger for the mitotic-like pathway. Among the equationally dividing cells, we observed more than 90 % of meiocytes without bivalents, where rye homologs did not form bivalents, too. The data indicate a potential application of wheat/rye lines in producing genetic stocks of amphidiploids with designated genomic constitutions.     

Chromosome pairing in tetraploid rye with monosomic-substitution wheat chromosomes

In tetraploid rye with single-substitution wheat chromosomes - 1A, 2A, 5A, 6A, 7A, 3B, 5B, 7B - chromosome pairing was analysed at metaphase I in PMCs with the C-banding method. The frequency of univalents of chromosome 1A was considerably higher than that of the other four wheat chromosomes of genome A (6A, 5A, 7A and 2A). Among chromosomes of genome B, the lowest mean frequency of univalents was observed for chromosome 5B. In monosomic lines, wheat chromosomes 1A, 2A, 5A, 6A, 7A and 5B paired with rye homoeologues most often in rod bivalents and in chain quadrivalents (also including 3B). The 47% pairing of 5B-5R chromosomes indicate that the rye genomes block the suppressor Ph1 gene activity. In monosomic plants with chromosomes 5A, 2A, 6A, 7A and 5B, a low frequency of rye univalents was observed. It was also found that the wheat chromosomes influenced the pairing of rye genome chromosomes, as well as the frequency of ring and rod bivalents and tri- and quadrivalents. However, the highest number of terminal chiasmata per chromosome occurred in the presence of chromosomes 5A and 2A, and the lowest - in the presence of chromosomes 3B and 7B. In the presence of chromosome 5B, the highest frequency of bivalents was observed. The results of the present study show that the rye genome is closer related to the wheat genome A of than to genome B. The high pairing of wheat-rye chromosomes, which occurs in tetraploid rye with substitution wheat chromosomes, indicates that there is a high probability of incorporating wheat chromosome segments into rye chromosomes.     

Telomere-independent homologue pairing and checkpoint escape of accessory ring chromosomes in male mouse meiosis

We analyzed transmission of a ring minichromosome (MC) through mouse spermatogenesis as a monosome and in the presence of a homologue. Mice, either monosomic or disomic for the MC, produced MC+ offspring. In the monosomic condition, most univalents underwent self-synapsis as indicated by STAG3, SCP3, and SCP1 deposition. Fluorescent in situ hybridization and three-dimensional fluorescence microscopy revealed that ring MCs did not participate in meiotic telomere clustering while MC homologues paired at the XY-body periphery. Self-synapsis of MC(s) and association with the XY-body likely allowed them to pass putative pachytene checkpoints. At metaphase I and II, MC kinetochores assembled MAD2 and BUBR1 spindle checkpoint proteins. Unaligned MCs triggered the spindle checkpoint leading to apoptosis of metaphase cells. Other MCs frequently associated with mouse pericentric heterochromatin, which may have allowed them to pass the spindle checkpoint. Our findings indicate a telomere-independent mechanism for pairing of mammalian MCs, illuminate escape routes to meiotic checkpoints, and give clues for genetic engineering of germ line-permissive chromosomal vectors.     

Preferential somatic pairing between homologous heterochromatic regions of human chromosomes.

The cytidine analog 5-azacytidine (5-azaC) induces an undercondensation of the heterochromatin in human chromosomes 1, 9, 15, 16, and Y when it is added in low concentrations to the late S-phase of growing lymphocyte cultures. In interphase nuclei, these heterochromatic regions are frequently somatically paired. The somatic pairing configurations are preserved up to metaphase stage in the 5-azaC-treated cultures and are thus susceptible to a direct microscopical examination. The statistical analysis of 1,000 somatic pairing configurations from 5-azaC-treated cells showed that the somatic pairing between the heterochromatic regions of homologous chromosomes is preferred over that between nonhomologous chromosomes.     

The pericentromeric heterochromatin of homologous chromosomes remains associated after centromere pairing dissolves in mouse spermatocyte meiosis

Chromosoma - In meiosis, crossovers between homologous chromosomes link them together. This enables them to attach to microtubules of the meiotic spindle as a unit, such that the homologs will be...     

Terminal regions of mammal chromosomes: plasticity and role in evolution

The review considers data on the composition, organization, and functional significance of terminal regions in mammalian chromosomes, including telomeres and subtelomeric regions. Because of specific structure, features of DNA replication, and characteristic localization in somatic and meiotic cells, these regions are hot spots for many events associated with genome functioning in mammals. Instability of these regions is of special interest. Evidence suggesting that instability of chromosomal regions containing telomeric DNA is a factor of chromosome evolution is discussed. The association of size and structure of telomeric regions with replicative aging and cell immortalization is considered. The review deals in detail with classical and alternative mechanisms of telomere size control, the significance of changes in telomeric region length in ontogeny, oncotransformation, and evolution. The issues related to telomere destabilization and the role of this process in chromosome rearrangement formation and chromosome evolution are discussed. The origin of telomere repeats in interstitial chromosome sites, including regions of evolutionary fusions-fissions is given special consideration. The possible role of ribosomal repeats and mechanisms similar to ALT (alternative lengthening of telomeres) in telomere reorganization in some taxa are discussed.     

Terminal regions of mammal chromosomes: Plasticity and role in evolution

The review considers data on the composition, organization, and functional significance of terminal regions in mammalian chromosomes, including telomeres and subtelomeric regions. Because of specific structure, features of DNA replication, and characteristic localization in somatic and meiotic cells, these regions are hot spots for many events associated with genome functioning in mammals. Instability of these regions is of special interest. Evidence suggesting that instability of chromosomal regions containing telomeric DNA is a factor of chromosome evolution is discussed. The association of size and structure of telomeric regions with replicative aging and cell immortalization is considered. The review deals in detail with classical and alternative mechanisms of telomere size control, the significance of changes in telomeric region length in ontogeny, oncotransformation, and evolution. The issues related to telomere destabilization and the role of this process in chromosome rearrangement formation and chromosome evolution are discussed. The origin of telomere repeats in interstitial chromosome sites, including regions of evolutionary fusions-fissions is given special consideration. The possible role of ribosomal repeats and mechanisms similar to ALT (alternative lengthening of telomeres) in telomere reorganization in some taxa are discussed.     

Identification of C-banded chromosomes in meiosis of common wheat,Triticum aestivum L.

Summary The C-banding pattern of nine meiotic chromosomes of common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) as described. In F₁s of crosses between monosomics of Chinese Spring and two Spanish wheat cultivars, univalent chromosomes were used to aid the recognition and analysis of the C-banding pattern for the individual chromosomes. The identification of one chromosome involved in one translocation in Chinese Spring x Pané 247 has been made through heterochromatin bands observed in the chromosomes involved in multivalents.     

Supernumerary chromosomes and their behaviour in meiosis of the holocentric Cuscuta babylonica Ghoisy

A supernumerary chromosome and its behaviour during meiosis is described in the parasitic herb Cuscuta babylonica Choisy (2n = 8 + 1B). This species is characterized by holocentric chromosome behaviour, and the occurrence of a supernumerary here is considered noteworthy.     

Molecular perspectives of chromosome pairing at meiosis

Ideas about the mechanisms that regulate chromosome pairing, recombination, and segregation during meiosis have gained in molecular detail over the last few years. The purpose of this article is to survey briefly the shifts in paradigms and experiments that have generated new perspectives. It has never been very clear what it is that brings together the homologous chromosomes at meiotic prophase. For a while it appeared that the synaptonemal complex might be the nuclear organelle responsible for synapsis, but the supporting evidence has not been entirely convincing. Whatever the mechanism, it has always been assumed that homologous synapsis creates the opportunity for homologous DNA sequences to initiate recombination. At present, alternative ideas are developing. Attractive is the concept that double strand DNA repair mechanisms, that find and use the undamaged homologue for repair, have evolved into a meiotic mechanism for the recognition and pairing of homologous sequences. Subsequent intimate synapsis of homologous chromosomes in the context of the synaptonemal complex may serve later functions in the regulation of interference and segregation at first anaphase. A number of areas that are being tested at present and some that may be investigated in the future are discussed at the end of the review.     

Sex chromosome pairing during male meiosis in marsupials

The pairing of the sex chromosomes at pachytene has been examined in twenty-two species of Australian marsupials, including four with complex sex chromosome systems. The axial elements of the sex chromosomes associate in all but one species. However, no synaptonemal complex has been observed between the axes of the X and Y chromosome in any of the examined species. Both the type of association between the sex chromosome axes, and the structural modifications of these axes are conserved within taxonomic groupings. In three species with complex sex chromosome systems, the t(XA), Y, A trivalents do not have a favoured relative orientation of the axes of the Y and A chromosomes, whereas in a fourth species with a t(XA₁), t(A₂YA₂), A₂ system the t(XA₁) and A₂ axes are in a cis arrangement with each other.     

The molecular features of chromosome pairing at meiosis: the polyploid challenge using wheat as a reference

During meiosis, chromosome numbers are halved, leading to haploid gametes, a process that is crucial for the maintenance of a stable genome through successive generations. The process for the accurate segregation of the homologues starts in pre-meiosis as each homologue is replicated and the respective products are held together as two sister chromatids via specific cohesion proteins. At the start of meiosis, each chromosome must recognise its homologue from amongst all the chromosomes present in the nucleus and then associate or pair with that homologue. This process of homologue recognition in meiosis is more complicated in polyploids because of the greater number of related chromosomes. Despite the presence of these related chromosomes, for polyploids such as wheat to produce viable gametes, they must behave as diploids during meiosis with only true homologues pairing. In this review, the relationship between the Ph1 cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)-like genes in wheat and the CDK2 genes in mammals and their involvement in controlling this process at meiosis is examined.     

The cytogenetics of homologous chromosome pairing in meiosis in plants

Three activities hallmark meiotic cell division: homologous chromosome pairing, synapsis, and recombination. Recombination and synapsis are well-studied but homologous pairing still holds many black boxes. In the past several years, many studies in plants have yielded insights into the mechanisms of chromosome pairing interactions. Research in several plant species showed the importance of telomere clustering on the nuclear envelope (telomere bouquet formation) in facilitating alignment of homologous chromosomes. Homologous pairing was also shown to be tied to the early stages of recombination by mutant analyses in Arabidopsis and maize. In contrast, little is known about the mechanisms that guide homolog interaction after their rough alignment by the bouquet and before the close-range recombination-dependent homology search. The relatively large and complex genomes of plants may require additional mechanisms, not needed in small genome eukaryotes, to distinguish between local homology of duplicated genes or transposable elements and global chromosomal homology. Plants provide an excellent large genome model for the study of homologous pairing and dissection of this process.     

Choose your partner: Chromosome pairing in yeast meiosis

Premeiotic association of homologous chromosomes in the yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been shown, by means of fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH)^(1,2). Time course and mutant studies show that the premeiotic associations are disrupted upon entry into meiosis, to be reestablished shortly before synapsis. The data are consistent with a model in which multiple, unstable interactions bring homologues together, prior to stable joining by recombination⁽³⁾.     

Homologous pairing and chromosome dynamics in meiosis and mitosis

Pairing of homologous chromosomes is an essential feature of meiosis, acting to promote high levels of recombination and to ensure segregation of homologs. However, homologous pairing also occurs in somatic cells, most regularly in Dipterans such as Drosophila, but also to a lesser extent in other organisms, and it is not known how mitotic and meiotic pairing relate to each other. In this article, I summarize results of recent molecular studies of pairing in both mitosis and meiosis, focusing especially on studies using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and GFP-tagging of single loci, which have allowed investigators to assay the pairing status of chromosomes directly. These approaches have permitted the demonstration that pairing occurs throughout the cell cycle in mitotic cells in Drosophila, and that the transition from mitotic to meiotic pairing in spermatogenesis is accompanied by a dramatic increase in pairing frequency. Similar approaches in mammals, plants and fungi have established that with few exceptions, chromosomes enter meiosis unpaired and that chromosome movements involving the telomeric, and sometimes centromeric, regions often precede the onset of meiotic pairing. The possible roles of proteins involved in homologous recombination, synapsis and sister chromatid cohesion in homolog pairing are discussed with an emphasis on those for which mutant phenotypes have permitted an assessment of effects on homolog pairing. Finally, I consider the question of the distribution and identity of chromosomal pairing sites, using recent data to evaluate possible relationships between pairing sites and other chromosomal sites, such as centromeres, telomeres, promoters and heterochromatin. I cite evidence that may point to a relationship between matrix attachment sites and homologous pairing sites.     

Cytogenetics of chromosome pairing in wheat

Meiotic chromosome pairing in Triticum aestivum is controlled by genetic systems promoting and reducing pairing. The pairing of homoeologous chromosomes is prevented principally by the activity of a single locus (Ph) distally located on the long arm of chromosome 5B. In certain hybrids, supernumerary chromosomes (B chromosomes) from Aegilops species can compensate for the absence of chromosome 5B preventing or reducing homoeologous pairing. Temperature-dependent variants and colchicine sensitivity have been used to show that there are at least two stages in the G1 of meiosis at which the occurrence of meiotic pairing is determined. Wheat may differ from lily in the detailed organization of meiosis.