Glutathione S-transferase T1 gene deletion polymorphism and lung cancer risk in Chinese population: A meta-analysis

Genetic variations in metabolic genes are considered to modulate metabolic process of carcinogens and are suggested to be related to cancer risk. However, epidemiological results are not always consistent. In this meta-analysis, we evaluated reported studies of association between polymorphism of glutathione S-transferase T1 gene (GSTT1) and the risk of lung cancer in Chinese population. We found an increased lung cancer risk among subjects carrying GSTT1 null genotype [odds ratio (OR) = 1.36, 95 percent confidence interval (95% CI): 1.09–1.69], using 1625 cases and 2188 controls from 11 studies. We also observed an increased risk of lung cancer among null genotype carriers in squamous cell carcinoma and andenocarcinoma, and on the basis of population control in stratified analyses. The meta-analysis suggests that GSTT1 deletion polymorphisms may have an effect on the susceptibility of lung cancer in Chinese population, and a study with the larger sample size is needed to further evaluate gene–gene and gene–environment interaction on GSTT1 deletion polymorphisms and lung cancer risk in Chinese population.     

Glutathione S-transferase T1 polymorphism contributes to bladder cancer risk: a meta-analysis involving 50 studies

Glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) is implicated in the inactivation of procarcinogens that contribute to cancer progression. However, studies investigating the association between GSTT1 polymorphism and bladder cancer (BC) risk have reported conflicting results; therefore, a meta-analysis was conducted. Fifty studies with 10,805 cases and 13,332 controls were recruited. The overall odds ratio for the GSTT1 null genotype was 1.1502 (95% CI=1.0384-1.2741). When stratified by ethnicity, significantly increased risk was only found for Caucasians. In Asians subgroup, interestingly, decreased BC risks were found in the Korean and Japanese populations but not in the Chinese population. When stratified by control sources, a slightly elevated risk was found in population-based but not in hospital-based studies. Besides, smoking was not found to modify the association between the GSTT1 null genotype and BC risk. When combined with the GSTM1 null genotype, a remarkably increased risk was found for BC. In general, our results suggest that the GSTT1 null genotype is associated with an increased risk of BC. Smoking did not modify the association between the GSTT1 null genotype and BC risk. Furthermore, a strong association was observed between the combination of GSTT1 null and GSTM1 null genotype and risk of BC. Further epidemiological studies will be needed to confirm our findings.     

APE1 Asp148Glu gene polymorphism and lung cancer risk: a meta-analysis

Many studies have examined the association between the APE1 T1349G (Asp148Glu) gene polymorphisms and lung cancer risk in various populations, but their results have been inconsistent. To assess this relationship more precisely, a meta-analysis was performed. The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CNKI database was searched for case–control studies published up to June 2010. Data were extracted and pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Ultimately, ten studies, comprising 2,696 lung cancer cases and 3,948 controls were included. Overall, for the G allele carriers (TG + GG) versus homozygote TT, the pooled OR was 1.037 (95% CI = 0.928–1.159 P = 0.001 for heterogeneity), for GG versus TT the pooled OR was 0.997 (95% CI = 0.861–1.154 P = 0.005 for heterogeneity). In the stratified analysis by ethnicity, significantly risks were not found among Asians or Caucasians. However, in the subgroup analyses by smoking status, significantly risks were found among smokers not in non-smokers. This meta-analysis suggested that the APE1 T1349G (Asp148Glu) polymorphism was not associated with lung cancer risk among Asians or Caucasians. But, the APE1 G allele was an increased risk factor for developing lung cancer among smokers.     

Association between CYP1A1 polymorphism and colorectal cancer risk: a meta-analysis

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common forms of cancer and is the third leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Published data on the association between CYP1A1 (MspI and Ile ⁴⁶² Val) polymorphisms and colorectal cancer risk are inconclusive. To address these issues, we carried out a meta-analysis of available case–control study. Online electronic searches of PubMed were performed. We identified 17 studies (6,673 colorectal cancer patients and 8,102 control subjects) that examined the association between CYP1A1 (MspI and Ile ⁴⁶² Val) polymorphisms and risk of colorectal cancer. For CYP1A1 MspI polymorphism, we performed a meta-analysis from 13 studies including 5,468 cases and 6,492 controls. Overall, there was no statistically significant association between CYP1A1 MspI polymorphism and colorectal cancer susceptibility. In the subgroup analyses based on ethnicities, no statistically significant associations were observed in all genetic models. With respect to CYP1A1 Ile ⁴⁶² Val polymorphism, a total of 14 studies including 6,654 cases and 7,859 controls were involved in this meta-analysis. The CYP1A1 Ile ⁴⁶² Val polymorphism was associated with risk of colorectal cancer. Ethnic subgroup analyses revealed that significant associations were found in Asians and Caucasians. In summary, this meta-analysis suggests that CYP1A1 Ile ⁴⁶² Val polymorphism was a low-penetrance susceptibility gene in colorectal cancer development. On the contrary, CYP1A1 MspI polymorphism does not seem capable of modifying colorectal cancer risk.     

The association between GSTM1 polymorphism and gastric cancer risk: a meta-analysis

Relationship of gastric cancer with the GSTM1 polymorphism was reported with inconsistent results. The objective of this study was to quantitatively evaluate the association between GSTM1 polymorphism and gastric cancer susceptibility. Relevant studies were identified from PubMed and references of retrieved articles. A meta-analysis was performed, which included 38 studies with 6,605 gastric cancer cases and 11,311 controls. The combined result based on all studies showed there was a significant link between GSTM1 null genotype and gastric cancer (OR = 1.20, 95%CI: 1.08–1.34). When stratifying for the race, the phenomenon was found that gastric cancer case had a significantly higher frequency of GSTM1 null genotype than control in Asians (OR = 1.27, 95%CI: 1.10–1.47). However, there was not enough evidence to show there was a significant difference in GSTM1 null genotype distribution between gastric cancer case and control in Caucasians (OR = 1.13, 95%CI: 0.96–1.32). This meta-analysis indicated that GSTM1 null genotype might be associated with increased gastric cancer risk in Asians. However, this meta-analysis did not provide an evidence of confirming association between GSTM1 polymorphism and gastric cancer in Caucasians.     

The TNF-alpha-238 polymorphism and cancer risk: a meta-analysis

Background and Objectives

Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) plays a very important role in the development and progress of cancer. Some TNF-α polymorphisms have been confirmed to increase cancer risks; however, the association between TNF-α-238 polymorphism and cancers remains controversial and ambiguous. The aim of this study is to explore a more precise estimation of its relationship with cancer using meta-analysis.

Methods

Electronic searches of several databases were conducted for all publications on the association between this variant and cancer through March 2011. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were used to access the strength of this association in the random-effect model.

Results

Thirty four studies with 34,679 cancer patients and 41,186 healthy controls were included. This meta-analysis showed no significant association between TNF-α-238 polymorphism and cancers (AA+GA vs GG: OR = 1.09, 95%CI = 0.88–1.34). In Caucasian and Asian subgroups, OR values (95% CI) were 1.14 (0.91–1.43) and 0.97 (0.58–1.61), respectively. In the subgroups of cancer type, no significant association was detected. The sensitivity analysis further strengthened the validity of these negative associations. No publication bias was observed in this study.

Conclusions

No significant association was found between the TNF-α-238 polymorphism and the risk for cancer.     

The association between UGT1A7 polymorphism and cancer risk: a meta-analysis

Background: studies investigating the associations between UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A7 (UGT1A7) gene polymorphisms and various carcinomas risk reported conflicting results. To derive a more precise estimation of the association, we have conducted a meta-analysis. Methods: data were collected from the following electronic databases: PubMed, Medline and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, with the last report up to September 2011. Case–control studies containing available genotype frequencies of UGT1A7 were chose. The odds ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were used to assess the strength of association. Results: a total of 22 separate case–control studies including 3852 cases and 5604 controls based on the search criteria were involved in this meta-analysis. The combined results based on all studies showed that there was a statistically significant link between UGT1A7*3 allele and cancer risk (OR = 1.31, 95%CI = 1.14–1.50, P = 0.0001). In the stratified analysis by racial descent, significant increased risk was found in Asian population for UGT1A7*3 allele (OR = 1.41, 95%CI = 1.22–1.63, P < 0.00001). No significant associations were found between the UGT1A7 polymorphism and cancer susceptibility among Caucasians and African-Americans. In the subgroup analysis by cancer types, significant associations were found in UGT1A7*2 allele (OR = 1.23, 95%CI = 1.06–1.43, P = 0.006) and *3 allele (OR = 1.51, 95%CI = 1.11–2.06, P = 0.009) for hepatocellular carcinoma, *3 allele for lung cancer (OR = 1.36, 95%CI = 1.11–1.68, P = 0.004) and for bladder cancer (OR = 1.50, 95%CI = 1.09–2.07, P = 0.01). Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that the UGT1A7*3 allele is a risk factor for cancer among Asians, especially for hepatocellular carcinoma.     

Pre-mir-27a rs895819 polymorphism and cancer risk: a meta-analysis

Aberrant expression of miRNAs plays critical roles in cancer development. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in miRNA precursors may affect miRNA expression levels. An important SNP in the pre-mir-27a with a A to G change (rs895819) was identified. Several original studies have explored the role of this SNP in cancer risk, but the results of these studies remain conflicting rather than conclusive. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis of the published studies to derive a more precise estimation of the association between pre-mir-27a rs895819 polymorphism and cancer risk. In this meta-analysis, a total of 6 case–control studies (including 3,255 cases and 4,181 controls) were analyzed. The results of the overall meta-analysis did not suggest any associations between pre-mir-27a rs895819 polymorphism and cancer susceptibility. However, an decreased risk was observed in the subgroup of breast cancer patients (G vs A: OR = 0.90, 95 % CI = 0.83 ~ 0.97; P _{heterogeneity}  = 0.75) or in the subgroup of Caucasian race (G vs A: OR = 0.90, 95 % CI = 0.83 ~ 0.97, P _{heterogeneity}  = 0.78, I ² = 0; AG vs AA: OR = 0.84, 95 % CI = 0.75 ~ 0.94, P _{heterogeneity}  = 0.35, I ² = 3.7 %; GG+AG vs AA: OR = 0.85, 95 % CI = 0.76 ~ 0.94, P _{heterogeneity}  = 0.48, I ² = 0). The findings suggest that pre-mir-27a rs895819 polymorphism may have some relation to breast cancer susceptibility or cancer development in Caucasian.     

The Arg194Trp polymorphism in the XRCC1 gene and cancer risk in Chinese Mainland population: a meta-analysis

The Arg194Trp polymorphism in the X-ray repair cross-complementing group 1 (XRCC1) gene has been proved to be in association with cancer risk in Chinese Mainland population, but a large number of studies have reported inconclusive results. A more comprehensive and precise estimation of the relationship is needed to clear the way towards future studies. Thus, we performed a meta-analysis to analysis these associations. A total of 34 case-control studies in 34 articles were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that the 194Trp/Trp homozygote had a 31% increased risk of cancer than 194Trp/Arg and 194Arg/Arg genotypes, OR was 1.31 and 95%CI was 1.13 to 1.53. In the subgroup analysis by cancer sites, the Arg194Trp polymorphism was associated with increased risks of lung cancer (OR = 1.27 and 95%CI: 1.07-1.50 for Trp/Trp versus Arg/Arg + Arg/Trp) and esophageal cancer (OR = 1.68 and 95%CI: 1.33-2.13 for Trp/Trp versus Arg/Arg + Arg/Trp). This meta-analysis suggested that the Arg194Trp polymorphism of the XRCC1 gene is a cancer susceptible factor among Chinese Mainland population. More intensive and deeper studies are needed to further reveal the mechanism between Arg194Trp polymorphisms of XRCC1 gene and cancer risks in Chinese Mainland population.     

Glutathione S-transferase P1 gene polymorphism and bladder cancer susceptibility: an updated analysis

Studies investigating the association between glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) gene polymorphism and bladder cancer (BC) risk have reported conflicting results. In order to clarify the effect of GSTP1 polymorphism on the BC susceptibility, we conducted an updated system review of published epidemiology studies to provide more precise evidence. We performed a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). 20 studies with 4,428 BC cases and 5,457 controls were identified. The combined analyses based on all studies showed that there was a significant difference in the genotype distribution in GSTP1(A313G) polymorphism between BC cases and controls not only in Asians (GG vs. AA?+?AG, OR?=?1.59, 95?% CI?=?1.01?C2.51) but also in Caucasians (GG vs. AA?+?AG, OR?=?1.51, 95?% CI?=?1.11?C2.06). Upon stratification for smoking status, we observed no statistically significant difference in genotype distribution of GSTP1 in ever-smokers. Combination of the high-risk genotypes (GSTM1 null?+?GSTT1 null?+?GSTP1 313 A/G or G/G) demonstrated further increase in the BC risk (OR?=?6.64, 95?%CI?=?3.63?C12.16). This meta-analysis suggests that GSTP1 313 G/G polymorphism is a strong predisposing risk factor for BC.     

Lack of association between glutathione S-transferase T1 gene polymorphism and laryngeal cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis based on 2,124 cases and 2,059 controls

Studies investigating the association between glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) gene polymorphism and laryngeal cancer susceptibility have reported conflicting results. The aim of the present study was to conduct a meta-analysis assessing the possible association of GSTT1 gene polymorphism with laryngeal cancer risk. The relevant studies were identified through a search of PubMed, Embase, ISI Web of Knowledge and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure until May 2011. Twelve studies were included in the present meta-analysis, which described a total of 2124 laryngeal cancer cases and 2059 controls. The overall odds ratio (OR) for GSTT1 null genotype was 1.40 (95% CI = 0.90-2.16). When stratifying for race, the pooled ORs for GSTT1 null genotype were 1.07 (95% CI = 0.81-1.41) in Caucasians and 5.63 (95% CI = 1.00-31.83) in Asians. The pooled ORs for GSTT1 null genotype were 1.03 (95% CI = 0.71-1.49) in population-based studies and 2.39 (95% CI = 0.73-7.86) in hospital-based studies, stratifying for study design. This meta-analysis suggested that there was lack of association between GSTT1 gene polymorphism and laryngeal cancer risk. However, larger scale primary studies are still required to further evaluate the interaction of GSTT1 gene polymorphism with laryngeal cancer risk.     

XPA A23G polymorphism and lung cancer risk: a meta-analysis

Case–control studies on the association between XPA A23G and lung cancer have provided either controversial or inconclusive results. To clarify the effect of XPA A23G on the risk of lung cancer, a meta-analysis of all case–control observational studies was performed. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) for various polymorphisms were estimated using random and fixed effects models. The Q-statistic was used to evaluate the homogeneity, and Egger and Begg tests were used to assess publication bias. For the homozygote GG and G allele carriers (GA + GG), the pooled ORs were 1.24 (95% CI 1.05–1.46; P = 0.27 for heterogeneity) and 1.30 (95% CI 1.13–1.51; P = 0.45 for heterogeneity) compared to the homozygous genotype (AA). In the stratified analysis by ethnicity, the ORs of the G allele carriers and the homozygote GG were 1.28 (95% CI 1.10–1.49; P = 0.07 for heterogeneity) and 1.42 (95% CI 1.04–1.93; P = 0.39 for heterogeneity) among non-Caucasians. No significant associations were found in the Caucasian population in any of the genetic models. When studies that were not in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) were corrected, the pattern of the results remained the same. Our results indicated a significantly decreased risk of lung cancer in non-Caucasians with the G allele.     

Interleukin-12B rs3212227 polymorphism and cancer risk: a meta-analysis

IL-12 plays a very important role in the development and progress of cancer. IL-12B rs3212227 polymorphism has been reported and many studies have focused on the role of this polymorphism in various cancers. However, the association between IL-12B rs3212227 polymorphism and cancer risk remains controversial. Therefore, we performed a systematic meta-analysis to estimate the overall cancer risk associated with this gene polymorphism and to quantify any potential between-study heterogeneity. PubMed and Embase databases were searched for case–control studies published up to April 1, 2012 that investigated IL-12B rs3212227 polymorphism and cancer risk. Odds ratios (OR) with 95?% confidence intervals (95?% CI) were used to access the strength of this association. Heterogeneity among articles and publication bias were also verified. Ten studies with 2,954 cancer patients and 3,276 healthy controls were included. This meta-analysis showed that there was a significant association between IL-12B rs3212227 polymorphism and overall cancer risk (CC/AC vs AA: OR?=?1.32, 95?% CI?=?1.06–1.63). When stratified by cancer type, we found a significant increased risk in cervical and nasopharyngeal cancer (OR?=?1.34, 95?% CI?=?1.04–1.73; OR?=?2.03, 95?% CI?=?1.57–2.63, respectively). In the stratified analysis, we also observed a similar association in population-based studies (OR?=?1.34, 95?% CI?=?1.00–1.80), Asian populations (OR?=?1.33, 95 % CI?=?1.06–1.67) and European populations (OR?=?1.54, 95 % CI?=?1.04–2.28). According to the results of our meta-analysis, IL-12B rs3212227 polymorphism probably is associated with a high risk of cancer.     

MDM2 SNP309 polymorphism and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis

The mouse double minute 2 (MDM2) gene encodes a phosphoprotein that interacts with P53 and negatively regulates its activity. SNP309 polymorphism (T-G) in the promoter of MDM2 gene has been reported to be associated with enhanced MDM2 expression and tumor development. Many published studies have evaluated the association between MDM2 SNP309 polymorphism and breast cancer risk. However, the results were inconsistent. We combined and analyzed the data from 19 case–control studies including 14,450 cases and 13,382 controls. Crude odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the strength of the association between MDM2 SNP309 polymorphism and breast cancer risk. No significant association was found in all genetic models in overall population. However, in subgroup analysis by ethnicity (4 studies in Asian group, 13 studies in European group, 2 studies of mixed population which were separated into 2 European population group and 2 African population group), we found an increased breast cancer susceptibility for GT versus TT (OR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.03–1.67) in Asian population and for GT versus TT (OR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.03–1.66) in African population. When stratified by family history status (5 studies in familial breast cancer group, 5 studies in sporadic breast cancer group), homozygous subjects of sporadic breast cases carrying the T309G G allele exhibited elevated breast cancer risk (OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.00–1.82), whereas heterozygous carriers did not show significant association with breast cancer risk for GT vs. TT (OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 0.84–1.87). Our meta–analysis suggests that MDM2 SNP309 polymorphism may increase the risk to breast cancer in Asian and African population.     

Association of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism with the risk of lung cancer: a meta-analysis

Abstract

Relationship between vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene polymorphism and the risk of lung cancer from the published reports are still conflicting. This study was conducted to evaluate the relationship between VDR TaqI (rs731236), BsmI (rs1544410) and ApaI (rs7975232) gene polymorphism and the risk of lung cancer using meta-analysis method. The association studies were identified from PubMed and Cochrane Library on 1 December 2013, and eligible investigations were included and synthesized using meta-analysis method. Six reports were recruited into this meta-analysis for the association of VDR gene polymorphism with lung cancer susceptibility. In the meta-analysis for ApaI gene polymorphism, AA genotype was associated with the risk of lung cancer in Asians. In the meta-analysis for BsmI gene polymorphism, B allele, BB genotype and bb genotype were associated with lung cancer in Asians, and B allele bb genotype were associated with lung cancer risk in overall populations; furthermore, bb genotype was associated with lung cancer risk in Caucasians. In the meta-analysis for TaqI gene polymorphism, t allele and TT genotype were associated with lung cancer in overall populations and in Caucasians. In conclusion, B allele bb genotype t allele and TT genotype were associated with lung cancer risk in overall populations. AA genotype, B allele, BB genotype and bb genotype were associated with the risk of lung cancer in Asians. Furthermore, bb genotype t allele and TT genotype was associated with lung cancer risk in Caucasians. However, more studies should be conducted to confirm it.     

Glutathione S-transferase M1 and T1 gene polymorphism and COPD risk in smokers: an updated analysis

We evaluated the association between GSTM1 and GSTT1 gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in smokers. A meta-analysis of the published case–control studies was performed. Published literature was retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), with last update in February, 2011. Data were extracted and a fixed- or random-effects model was used to calculate pooled odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals depending on statistical heterogeneity. Fourteen eligible studies, comprising 1,665 COPD cases and 1,614 controls, were included in the meta-analysis. The combined analyses showed that there was a significant difference in GSTM1 genotype distribution between COPD cases and controls among Caucasians, but not among Asians. The combined GSTM1/GSTT1 null genotype conferred a 1.36-fold greater risk for COPD in Asian smokers. The GSTT1 null genotype alone was not associated with enhanced risk for COPD. The GSTM1 null genotype is significantly associated with an increasing susceptibility to COPD in Caucasian smokers, but not in Asian smokers. The GSTM1/GSTT1 null genotype is a significant risk factor for developing COPD in Asian smokers. The GSTT1 null genotype, however, was not associated with COPD.     

Association of hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism with gastric cancer risk: a meta-analysis

Studies investigating the association between human 8-oxoguanine glycosylase 1(hOGG1) Ser326Cys polymorphism and gastric cancer (GC) risk have reported conflicting results. We performed a meta-analysis of published case–control studies to better compare results between studies. 11 eligible studies with 2,180 GC cases and 3,985 controls were selected. There were 5 studies involving Caucasians and 5 studies involving Asians. The combined result based on all studies did not show significant difference in any genetics models. Ser/Cys + Cys/Cys versus Ser/Ser (OR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.81–1.03), Cys/Cys versus Ser/Cys + Ser/Ser (OR = 1.07, 95% CI 0.80–1.44), Ser/Cys versus Ser/Ser (OR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.80–1.03), Sys/Cys versus Ser/Cys (OR = 1.10, 95% CI 0.83–1.47), Cys/Cys versus Ser/Ser (OR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.74–1.34), Cys versus Ser (OR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.88–1.17).When stratifying for ethnicity, there was still no significant association found between hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism and GC risk. Funnel plot and Egger’s test showed some evidence of publication bias on the basis of all studies. Two studies were the main reason because their samples were too small. However, the result of sensitivity analysis suggested that the influence of these two studies and one mixed population study on the pooled OR was weak. Our result could explain the association between hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism and GC risk. In conclusion, we did not found the evidence that the Cys allele at codon 326 of hOGG1 could increase GC risk in our analysis.     

Glutathione S-transferase M1, T1, and P1 polymorphisms and thyroid cancer risk: A meta-analysis

Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) genetic variants have been explored extensively as a predictive factor for cancer etiology. This meta-analysis aimed to examine the associations GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1 genetic polymorphisms with thyroid cancer risk. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and HuGNet database were searched up to November 2011 using the appropriate terms. Twelve studies regarding GSTM1 null polymorphism (1569 cases and 2907 controls), 11 studies concerning GSTT1 null polymorphism (1515 cases and 2863 controls), and 8 studies on GSTP1 Ile105Val (965 cases and 1604 controls) were included in the meta-analysis. The random effects odds ratio was 1.07 (95% CI: 0.88–1.31; I² = 54.1%, P for heterogeneity = 0.013) for the GSTM1 null vs. present genotype and 1.08 (95% CI: 0.75–1.57; I² = 81.4%, P for heterogeneity < 0.001) for the GSTT1 null vs. present genotype, and 1.02 (95% CI: 0.70–1.49; I² = 74.6%, P for heterogeneity < 0.001) for the GSTP1 Val/Val + Val/Ile vs. Ile/Ile genotype. Similarly, no significant associations were demonstrated for subgroup analyses performed by ethnicity and histological type. In conclusion, these three polymorphisms are unlikely to be major determinants of susceptibility to thyroid cancer. Reasons for potential heterogeneity of effects, which could include true biologic heterogeneity, publication bias, or chance, deserve further investigation. The relationship between these three genes and thyroid carcinoma must be evaluated further with gene–gene and gene–environment interactions.     

Epidermal growth factor gene polymorphism and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis

Background

Hepatocarcinogenesis is a complex process that may be influenced by many factors, including polymorphism in the epidermal growth factor (EGF) gene. Previous work suggests an association between the EGF 61*A/G polymorphism (rs4444903) and susceptibility to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the results have been inconsistent. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis of several studies covering a large population to address this controversy.

Methods

PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar and the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were systematically searched to identify relevant studies. Data were abstracted independently by two reviewers. A meta-analysis was performed to examine the association between EGF 61*A/G polymorphism and susceptibility to HCC. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated.

Results

Eight studies were chosen in this meta-analysis, involving 1,304 HCC cases (1135 Chinese, 44 Caucasian and 125 mixed) and 2,613 controls (1638 Chinese, 77 Caucasian and 898 mixed). The EGF 61*G allele was significantly associated with increased risk of HCC based on allelic contrast (OR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.16–1.44, p<0.001), homozygote comparison (OR = 1.79, 95% CI = 1.39–2.29, p<0.001) and a recessive genetic model (OR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.16–1.54, p<0.001), while patients carrying the EGF 61*A/A genotype had significantly lower risk of HCC than those with the G/A or G/G genotype (A/A vs. G/A+G/G, OR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.53–0.83, p<0.001).

Conclusion

The 61*G polymorphism in EGF is a risk factor for hepatocarcinogenesis while the EGF 61*A allele is a protective factor. Further large and well-designed studies are needed to confirm this conclusion.     

Glutathione S-transferases gene polymorphisms and risk of male idiopathic infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) polymorphisms have been implicated in susceptibility to male idiopathic infertility, but study results are still controversial. To investigate the genetic associations between GSTs polymorphisms and risk of male idiopathic infertility, a systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. Meta-analysis was performed by pooling odds ratio (OR) with its corresponding 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) form studies in electronic databases up to March 16, 2012. Glutathione S-transferase M 1 (GSTM1) null genotype, Glutathione S-transferase T 1 (GSTT1) null genotype, and dual null genotype of GSTM1/GSTT1 were analyzed independently. 14 eligible studies with a total of 1,845 idiopathic infertility males and 1,729 controls were included. There were 13 studies on GSTM1 polymorphism, 10 ones on GSTT1 polymorphism and 5 ones on GSTM1-GSTT1 interaction analysis. Meta-analyses of total relevant studies showed GSTM1 null genotype was significantly associated with an increased risk of male idiopathic infertility (OR = 1.40, 95 % CI 1.07–1.84, P _OR = 0.015). The GSTM1-GSTT1 interaction analysis showed dual null genotype of GSTM1/GSTT1 was also significantly associated with increased risk of male idiopathic infertility (OR = 1.85, 95 % CI 1.07–3.21, P _OR = 0.028). Subgroup analyses by ethnicity showed the associations above were still statistically significant in Caucasians (For GSTM1, OR = 1.51, 95 % CI 1.11–2.05, P _OR = 0.009; For GSTM1/GSTT1, OR = 2.10, 95 % CI 1.51–2.91, P _OR < 0.001). This meta-analysis suggests GSTM1 null genotype contributes to increased risk of male idiopathic infertility in Caucasians, and males with dual null genotype of GSTM1/GSTT1 are particularly susceptible to developing idiopathic infertility.