The location and distribution of neural crest-derived Schwann cells in developing peripheral nerves in the chick forelimb.

The location and distribution of neural crest-derived Schwann cells during development of the peripheral nerves of chick forelimbs were examined using chick-quail chimeras. Neural crest cells were labeled by transplantation of the dorsal part of the neural tube from a quail donor to a chick host at levels of the neural tube destined to give rise to brachial innervation. The ventral roots, spinal nerves, and peripheral nerves innervating the chick forelimb were examined for the presence of quail-derived neural crest cells at several stages of embryonic development. These quail cells are likely to be Schwann cells or their precursors. Quail-derived Schwann cells were present in ventral roots and spinal nerves, and were distributed along previously described neural crest migratory pathways or along the peripheral nerve fibers at all stages of development examined. During early stages of wing innervation, quail-derived Schwann cells were not evenly distributed, but were concentrated in the ventral root and at the brachial plexus. The density of neural crest-derived Schwann cells decreased distal to the plexus, and no Schwann cells were ever seen in advance of the growing nerve front. When the characteristic peripheral nerve branching pattern was first formed, Schwann cells were clustered where muscle nerves diverged from common nerve trunks. In still older embryos, neural crest-derived Schwann cells were evenly distributed along the length of the peripheral nerves from the ventral root to the distal nerve terminations within the musculature of the forelimb. These observations indicate that Schwann cells accompany axons into the developing limb, but they do not appear to lead or direct axons to their targets. The transient clustering of neural crest-derived Schwann cells in the ventral root and at places where axon trajectories diverge from one another may reflect a response to some environmental feature within these regions.     

The distribution of neural crest-derived Schwann cells from subsets of brachial spinal segments into the peripheral nerves innervating the chick forelimb.

Neural crest cells from brachial levels of the neural tube populate the ventral roots, spinal nerves, and peripheral nerves of the chick forelimb where they give rise to Schwann cells. The distribution of neural crest cells in the developing forelimb was examined using homotopic and heterotopic chick-quail chimeras to label neural crest cells from subsets of the brachial spinal segments. Neural crest cells from particular regions of the spinal cord populated ventral roots and spinal nerves adjacent to or immediately posterior to the graft. Crest cells also populated the brachial plexus in accord with their segmental origins. In the forelimb, neural crest cells populated muscle nerves with anterior brachial spinal segments populating nerves to anterior musculature of the forelimb and posterior brachial spinal segments populating nerves to posterior musculature. Similar patterns were seen following both homotopic and heterotopic transplantation. In both types of grafts, the distribution of neural crest cells largely matched the sensory and motor projection pattern from the same spinal segmental level. This suggests that neural crest-derived Schwann cells from a particular spinal segment may use sensory and motor fibers emerging from the same segmental level as substrates to guide their migration into the periphery.     

Embryonic origin of avian corneal sensory nerves.

Sensory nerves play a vital role in maintaining corneal transparency. They originate in the trigeminal ganglion, which is derived from two embryonic cell populations (cranial neural crest and ectodermal placode). Nonetheless, it is unclear whether corneal nerves arise from neural crest, from placode, or from both. Quail-chick chimeras and species-specific antibodies allowed tracing quail-derived neural crest or placode cells during trigeminal ganglion and corneal development, and after ablation of either neural crest or placode. Neural crest chimeras showed quail nuclei in the proximal part of the trigeminal ganglion, and quail nerves in the pericorneal nerve ring and in the cornea. In sharp contrast, placode chimeras showed quail nuclei in the distal part of the trigeminal ganglion, but no quail nerves in the cornea or in the pericorneal nerve ring. Quail placode-derived nerves were present, however, in the eyelids. Neural crest ablation between stages 8 and 9 resulted in diminished trigeminal ganglia and absence of corneal innervation. Ablation of placode after stage 11 resulted in loss of the ophthalmic branch of the trigeminal ganglion and reduced corneal innervation. Noninnervated corneas still became transparent. These results indicate for the first time that although both neural crest and placode contribute to the trigeminal ganglion, corneal innervation is entirely neural crest-derived. Nonetheless, proper corneal innervation requires presence of both cell types in the embryonic trigeminal ganglion. Also, complete lack of innervation has no discernible effect on development of corneal transparency or cell densities.     

The origin and development of glial cells in peripheral nerves

During the development of peripheral nerves, neural crest cells generate myelinating and non-myelinating glial cells in a process that parallels gliogenesis from the germinal layers of the CNS. Unlike central gliogenesis, neural crest development involves a protracted embryonic phase devoted to the generation of, first, the Schwann cell precursor and then the immature Schwann cell, a cell whose fate as a myelinating or non-myelinating cell has yet to be determined. Embryonic nerves therefore offer a particular opportunity to analyse the early steps of gliogenesis from transient multipotent stem cells, and to understand how this process is integrated with organogenesis of peripheral nerves.     

Analysis of migratory behavior of neural crest and fibroblastic cells in embryonic tissues

The precise migration of neural crest cells is apparently controlled by their environment. We have examined whether the embryonic tissue spaces in which crest cells normally migrate are sufficient to account for the pattern of crest cell distribution and whether other migratory cells could also distribute themselves along these pathways. To this end, we grafted a variety of cell types into the initial crest cell migratory pathway in chicken embryos. These cell types included (a) undifferentiated neural crest cells isolated from cultured neural tubes, intact crest from cranial neural folds, and crest derivatives (pigment cells and spinal ganglia); (b) normal embryonic fibroblastic cells from somite, limb bud, lateral plate, and heart ventricle; and (c) a transformed fibroblastic cell line (Sarcoma 180). Crest cells or their derivatives grafted into the crest migratory pathway all distributed normally, although in contrast to the result when neural tubes were graftedin situ, fewer cells were observed in the epithelium and few or none were localized in the nascent spinal ganglia. Grafted quail somite cells contributed to normal somitic structures and did not migrate extensively in the chicken host. Other fibroblasts did not migrate along cranial or trunk crest pathways, or invade adjacent tissues, but remained intact at the graft site. Sarcoma 180 cells, however, distributed themselves along the normal trunk crest pathway. Cranial and trunk crest cells and crest derivatives grafted ectopically in the limb bud or somite also dispersed, and were found along the ventral migratory pathway. Fibroblastic cells grafted into ectopic sites again remained intact and did not invade host tissue. We conclude (1) that neural crest cells and their derivatives are highly motile and invasive in their normal pathway, as well as in unfamiliar embryonic environments; and (2) that the crest pathway does not act solely to direct neural crest cells, since at least one transformed cell can follow the crest migratory route.     

The developmental potentials of the caudalmost part of the neural crest are restricted to melanocytes and glia

The avian spinal cord is characterized by an absence of motor nerves and sensory nerves and ganglia at its caudalmost part. Since peripheral sensory neurons derive from neural crest cells, three basic mechanisms could account for this feature: (i) the caudalmost neural tube does not generate any neural crest cells; (ii) neural crest cells originating from the caudal part of the neural tube cannot give rise to dorsal root ganglia or (iii) the caudal environment is not permissive for the formation of dorsal root ganglia. To solve this problem, we have first studied the pattern of expression of ventral (HNF3beta) and dorsal (slug) marker genes in the caudal region of the neural tube; in a second approach, we have recorded the emergence of neural crest cells using the HNK1 monoclonal antibody; and finally, we have analyzed the developmental potentials of neural crest cells arising from the caudalmost part of the neural tube in avian embryo in in vitro culture and by means of heterotopic transplantations in vivo. We show here that neural crest cells arising from the neural tube located at the level of somites 47-53 can differentiate both in vitro and in vivo into melanocytes and Schwann cells but not into neurons. Furthermore, the neural tube located caudally to the last pair of somites (i.e. the 53rd pair) does not give rise to neural crest cells in any of the situations tested. The specific anatomical aspect of the avian spinal cord can thus be accounted for by limited developmental potentials of neural crest cells arising from the most caudal part of the neural tube.     

Plasticity and predetermination of mesencephalic and trunk neural crest transplanted into the region of the cardiac neural crest

The cardiac neural crest contains ectomesenchymal and neural anlagen that are necessary for normal heart development. It is not known whether other regions of the neural crest are capable of supporting normal heart development. In the experiments reported herein, quail donor embryos provided cardiac, trunk, or mesencephalic neural crest to replace or add to the chick host cardiac neural crest. Neither trunk nor mesencephalic neural crest was capable of generating ectomesenchyme competent to effect truncal septation. Addition of mesencephalic neural crest resulted in a high incidence of persistent truncus arteriosus, suggesting that ectomesenchyme derived from the mesencephalic region interferes with ectomesenchyme derived from the cardiac neural crest. Derivatives from the trunk neural crest, on the other hand, did not result in abnormal development of the truncal septum. While mesencephalic neural crest seeded the cardiac ganglia with both neurons and supporting cells, this capability was limited in the trunk neural crest to the more mature regions. These studies indicate a predetermination of the ectomesenchymal derivatives of the cranial neural crest and a possible competition of neural anlagen to form neurons and supporting cells in the cardiac ganglia.     

Adrenergic innervation of the developing chick heart: neural crest ablations to produce sympathetically aneural hearts

Ablation of various regions of premigratory trunk neural crest which gives rise to the sympathetic trunks was used to remove sympathetic cardiac innervation. Neuronal uptake of [3H]-norepinephrine was used as an index of neuronal development in the chick atrium. Following ablation of neural crest over somites 10-15 or 15-20, uptake was significantly decreased in the atrium at 16 and 17 days of development. Ablation of neural crest over somites 5-10 and 20-25 caused no decrease in [3H]-norepinephrine uptake. Removal of neural crest over somites 5-25 or 10-20 caused approximately equal depletions of [3H]-norepinephrine uptake in the atrium. Cardiac norepinephrine concentration was significantly depressed following ablation of neural crest over somites 5-25 but not over somites 10-20. Light-microscopic and histofluorescent preparations confirmed the absence of sympathetic trunks in the region of the normal origin of the sympathetic cardiac nerves following neural crest ablation over somites 10-20. The neural tube and dorsal root ganglia were damaged in the area of the neural-crest ablation; however, all of these structures were normal cranial and caudal to the lesioned area. Development of most of the embryos as well as the morphology of all of the hearts was normal following the lesion. These results indicate that it is possible to produce sympathetically aneural hearts by neural-crest ablation; however, sympathetic cardiac nerves account for an insignificant amount of cardiac norepinephrine. The adrenal medulla is the most likely source of cardiac norepinephrine in sympathetically aneural hearts.     

Spinal motor axons and neural crest cells use different molecular guides for segmental migration through the rostral half-somite

The peripheral nervous system in vertebrates is composed of repeating metameric units of spinal nerves. During development, factors differentially expressed in a rostrocaudal pattern in the somites confine the movement of spinal motor axons and neural crest cells to the rostral half of the somitic sclerotome. The expression patterns of transmembrane ephrin-B ligands and interacting EphB receptors suggest that these proteins are likely candidates for coordinating the segmentation of spinal motor axons and neural crest cells. In vitro, ephrin-B1 has indeed been shown to repel axons extending from the rodent neural tube (Wang & Anderson, 1997). In avians, blocking interactions between EphB3 expressed by neural crest cells and ephrin-B1 localized to the caudal half of the somite in vivo resulted in loss of the rostrocaudal patterning of trunk neural crest migration (Krull et al., 1997). The role of ephrin-B1 in patterning spinal motor axon outgrowth in avian embryos was investigated. Ephrin-B1 protein was found to be expressed in the caudal half-sclerotome and in the dermomyotome at the appropriate time to interact with the EphB2 receptor expressed on spinal motor axons. Treatment of avian embryo explants with soluble ephrin-B1, however, did not perturb the segmental outgrowth of spinal motor axons through the rostral half-somite. In contrast, under the same treatment conditions with soluble ephrin-B1, neural crest cells migrated aberrantly through both rostral and caudal somite halves. These results indicate that the interaction between ephrin-B1 and EphB2 is not required for patterning spinal motor axon segmentation. Even though spinal motor axons traverse the same somitic pathway as neural crest cells, different molecular guidance mechanisms appear to influence their movement.     

Patterning the cranial neural crest: hindbrain segmentation and Hox gene plasticity

Understanding the patterning mechanisms that control head development--particularly the neural crest and its contribution to bones, nerves and connective tissue--is an important problem, as craniofacial anomalies account for one-third of all human congenital defects. Classical models for craniofacial patterning argue that the morphogenic program and Hox gene identity of the neural crest is pre-patterned, carrying positional information acquired in the hindbrain to the peripheral nervous system and the branchial arches. Recently, however, plasticity of Hox gene expression has been observed in the hindbrain and cranial neural crest of chick, mouse and zebrafish embryos. Hence, craniofacial development is not dependent on neural crest prepatterning, but is regulated by a more complex integration of cell and tissue interactions.     

Neural crest cell migratory pathways in the trunk of the chick embryo

Neural crest cells migrate during embryogenesis to give rise to segmented structures of the vertebrate peripheral nervous system: namely, the dorsal root ganglia and the sympathetic chain. However, neural crest cell arise from the dorsal neural tube where they are apparently unsegmented. It is generally agreed that the somites impose segmentation on migrating crest cells, but there is a disagreement about two basic questions: exactly pathways do neural crest cells use to move through or around somites, and do neural crest cells actively migrate or are they passively dispersed by the movement of somite cells? The answers to both questions are critically important to any further understanding of the mechanisms underlying the precise distribution of the neural crest cells that develop into ganglia. We have done an exhaustive study of the locations of neural crest cells in chick embryos during early stages of their movement, using antibodies to neural crest cells (HNK-1), to neural filament-associated protein in growing nerve processes (E/C8), and to the extracellular matrix molecule laminin. Our results show that Some neural crest cells invade the extracellular space between adjacent somites, but the apparent majority move into the somites themselves along the border between the dermatome/myotome (DM) and the sclerotome. Neural crest cells remain closely associated with the anterior half of the DM of developing somites as they travel, suggesting that the basal lamina of the DM may be used as a migratory substratum. Supporting this idea is our observation that the development of the DM basal lamina coincides in time and location with the onset of crest migration through the somite. The leading front of neural crest cells advance through the somite while the length of the DM pathway remains constant, suggesting active locomotion, at least in this early phase of development. Neural crest cells leave the DM at a later stage of development to associate with the dorsal aorta, where sympathetic ganglia form, and to associate with newly emerging fibers of the ventral root nerve, where they presumably give rise to neuronal supportive cells. Thus we propose that the establishment of the segmental pattern of the peripheral ganglia and nerves depends on the timely development of appropriate substrata to guide and distribute migrating neural crest cells during the early stages of embryogenesis.     

Control of neural crest cell dispersion in the trunk of the avian embryo

Many hypotheses have been advanced to explain the orientation and directional migration of neural crest cells. These include positive and negative chemotaxis, haptotaxis, galvanotaxis, and contact inhibition. To test directly the factors that may control the directional dispersion of the neural crest, I have employed a variety of grafting techniques in living embryos. In addition, time-lapse video microscopy has been used to study neural crest cells in tissue culture. Trunk neural crest cells normally disperse from their origin at the dorsal neural tube along two extracellular pathways. One pathway extends laterally between the ectoderm and somites. When either pigmented neural crest cells or neural crest cells isolated from 24-hr cultures are grafted into the space lateral to the somites, they migrate: (1) medially toward the neural tube in the space between the ectoderm and somites and (2) ventrally along intersomitic blood vessels. Once the grafted cells contact the posterior cardinal vein and dorsal aorta they migrate along both blood vessels for several somite lengths in the anterior-posterior axis. Neural crest cells grafted lateral to the somites do not immediately move laterally into the somatic mesoderm of the body wall or the limb. Dispersion of neural crest cells into the mesoderm occurs only after blood vessels and nerves have first invaded, which the grafted cells then follow. The other neural crest pathway extends ventrally alongside the neural tube in the intersomitic space. When neural crest cells were grafted to a ventral position, between the notochord and dorsal aorta, in this intersomitic pathway at the axial level of the last somite, the grafted cells migrate rapidly within 2 hr in two directions: (1) dorsally, in the intersomitic space, until the grafted cells contact the ventrally moving stream of the host neural crest and (2) laterally, along the dorsal aorta and endoderm. All of the above experiments indicate that neither a preestablished chemotactic nor adhesive (haptotactic) gradient exists in the embryo since the grafted neural crest cells will move in the reverse direction along these pathways toward the dorsal neural tube. For the same reason, these experiments also show that dispersal of the neural crest is not directed passively by other environmental controls, since the cells can clearly move counter to their usual pathway and against such putative passive mechanisms.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

The control of avian cephalic neural crest cytodifferentiation. II. Neural tissues.

A series of neural crest transplantations has been performed to (1) analyze whether avian premigratory cranial neural crest cells are pluripotential or restricted to specific developmental pathways and (2) examine the ability of trunk neural crest cells to develop in an environment usually occupied by cranial crest cells. Quail embryos, the cells of which have a unique nuclear marker, were used as donors and chick embryos as hosts. Hindbrain crest cells grafted in the place of diencephalic crest cells failed to form neurons in all but one case, in which a small ectopic ganglion was found. In the reciprocal transplants, neural crest cells emigrating from a segment of forebrain crest tissue grafted in the place of metencephalic crest cells produced trigeminal and ciliary ganglia which were completely normal. Thus, crest cells which normally never form ganglionic neurons will do so if placed in a suitable neurogenic environment. These results prove that premigratory avian cranial crest cells are not restricted to specific developmental pathways, but are initially pluripotential. Trunk crest cells grafted in the place of metencephalic crest cells form neuronal ganglia along the proximal trigeminal motor roots but do not form normal trigeminal ganglia. These root ganglia do not display normal peripheral projections, and placode cells, a normal component of the trigeminal ganglion, form ganglia in ectopic locations. Thus, while trunk crest cells respond to the metencephalic environment and form neurons, their response is different from that of cranial crest cells in the same location. Whether this is due to differences in developmental potential or in initial population size is not known.     

Neural crest stem cells undergo multilineage differentiation in developing peripheral nerves to generate endoneurial fibroblasts in addition to Schwann cells

Neural crest stem cells (NCSCs) persist in peripheral nerves throughout late gestation but their function is unknown. Current models of nerve development only consider the generation of Schwann cells from neural crest, but the presence of NCSCs raises the possibility of multilineage differentiation. We performed Cre-recombinase fate mapping to determine which nerve cells are neural crest derived. Endoneurial fibroblasts, in addition to myelinating and non-myelinating Schwann cells, were neural crest derived, whereas perineurial cells, pericytes and endothelial cells were not. This identified endoneurial fibroblasts as a novel neural crest derivative, and demonstrated that trunk neural crest does give rise to fibroblasts in vivo, consistent with previous studies of trunk NCSCs in culture. The multilineage differentiation of NCSCs into glial and non-glial derivatives in the developing nerve appears to be regulated by neuregulin, notch ligands, and bone morphogenic proteins, as these factors are expressed in the developing nerve, and cause nerve NCSCs to generate Schwann cells and fibroblasts, but not neurons, in culture. Nerve development is thus more complex than was previously thought, involving NCSC self-renewal, lineage commitment and multilineage differentiation.     

Developmental potentialities in the nonneuronal population of quail sensory ganglia

Sensory ganglia taken from quail embryos at E4 to E7 were back-transplanted into the vagal neural crest migration pathway (i.e., at the level of somites 1 to 6) of 8- to 10-somite stage chick embryos. Three types of sensory ganglia were used: (i) proximal ganglia of cranial sensory nerves IX and X forming the jugular-superior ganglionic complex, whose neurons and nonneuronal cells both arise from the neural crest; (ii) distal ganglia of the same nerves, i.e., the petrosal and nodose ganglia in which the neurons originate from epibranchial placodes and the nonneuronal cells from the neural crest; (iii) dorsal root ganglia taken in the truncal region between the fore- and hindlimb levels. The question raised was whether cells from the graft would be able to yield the neural crest derivatives normally arising from the hindbrain and vagal crest, such as carotid body type I and II cells, enteric ganglia, Schwann cells located along the local nerves, and the nonneuronal contingent of cells in the host nodose ganglion. All the grafted cephalic ganglia provided the host with the complete array of these cell types. In contrast, grafted dorsal root ganglion cells gave rise only to carotid body type I and II cells, to the nonneuronal cells of the nodose ganglion, and to Schwann cells; the ganglion-derived cells did not invade the gut and therefore failed to contribute to the host's enteric neuronal system. Coculture on the chorioallantoic membrane of aneural chick gut directly associated with quail sensory ganglia essentially reinforced these results. These data demonstrate that the capacity of peripheral ganglia to provide enteric plexuses varies according to the level of the neuraxis from which they originate.     

Expression of zebrafish fkd6 in neural crest-derived glia

The zebrafish fkd6 gene is a marker for premigratory neural crest. In this study, we analyze later expression in putative glia of the peripheral nervous system. Prior to neural crest migration, fkd6 expression is downregulated in crest cells. Subsequently, expression appears initially in loose clusters of cells in positions corresponding to cranial ganglia. Double labelling with a neuronal marker shows that fkd6-expressing cells are not differentiated neurones and generally lie peripheral to neurones in ganglia. Later, expression appears associated with the posterior lateral line and other cranial nerves. For the posterior lateral line nerve, we show that fkd6-labeling extends caudally along this nerve in tight correlation with lateral line primordium migration and axon elongation. Expression in colourless mutant embryos is consistent with these cells being satellite glia and Schwann cells.