Folate-sensitive fragile sites on the X-chromosome heterochromatin of the Indian mole rat, Nesokia indica

Folate-sensitive fragile sites have been demonstrated on the X chromosome of the Indian mole rat, Nesokia indica (subfamily Murinae), utilizing peripheral blood lymphocyte cultures. All normal female individuals expressed fragile sites on the constitutive heterochromatic long arm of one of their two X chromosomes (heterozygous expression); in contrast, no fragile sites were found on the single X chromosome of normal males. Preferential transmission of the maternal fragile X to the daughters is therefore suggested. Four sites have been detected so far: fra Xq1, fra Xq2, fra Xq3, and fra Xc (centromeric). It is significant that their location corresponds to the regions where constitutive heterochromatic deletions occur that result in a variety of polymorphic X chromosomes in natural populations of Nesokia. Thus there is a correlation between fragile sites, deletion sites, and karyotypic changes. In individuals that did not reproduce in the laboratory, there were more fragile sites on both X chromosomes of the females (homozygous/double heterozygous expression) and also on the X of the males (hemizygous expression). This difference in fragile site expression from the normal situation could be attributed to one or more new mutations. However, the mechanism by which fragile sites influence reproductive performance is unclear.     

Chromosome breakage and recombination at fragile sites.

Chromosomal fragile sites are points on chromosomes that usually appear as nonstaining chromosome or chromatid gaps. It has frequently been suggested that fragile sites may be involved in chromosome breakage and recombination events. We and others have previously shown that fragile sites predispose to intrachromosomal recombination as measured by sister-chromatid exchanges. These findings suggested that fragile site expression often, if not always, is accompanied by DNA strand breakage. In the present report, fragile sites are shown to predispose to deletions and interchromosomal recombination. By use of somatic cell hybrids containing either human chromosome 3 or the fragile X chromosome, deletions and translocations were induced by FUdR or aphidicolin with breakpoints at the fragile sites Xq27 or 3p14.2 (FRA3B) or at points so close to the fragile sites as to be cytogenetically indistinguishable. Southern blot analysis of DNA from a panel of chromosome 3 deletion and translocation hybrids was then utilized to detect loss or retention of markers flanking FRA3B and to corroborate the cytogenetic evidence that the breakpoints were at this fragile site. One cell line with a reciprocal translocation between human chromosome 3 (with breakpoint at 3p14.2) and a hamster chromosome showed cytogenetically that the fragile site was expressed on both derivative chromosomes, supporting the hypothesis that the fragile site represents a repeated sequence. The approach described provides a means of generating specific rearrangements in somatic cell hybrids with a breakpoint at a fragile site.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Population cytogenetics of folate-sensitive fragile sites

Summary The frequencies of folate-sensitive autosomal rare fragile sites (ARFS) were compared in populations of mentally retarded, mentally subnormal, and mentally normal children and of patients referred for diagnostic chromosome study. The frequencies did not differ significantly. Altogether, an autosomal rare fragile site was found in 16 of 1445 individuals (1 in 90). Of six different folate-sensitive ARFS detected, the most common one was FRA9A, with a frequency of 1 in 241 individuals. In addition, FRA17A, classified as a distamycin A-inducible fragile site, was found with a frequency of 1 in 206. It was regarded as a spontaneously expressive fragile site. In 19 families in which transmission of an autosomal rare fragile site was studied, the mother was the carrier in 16 families and the father, in one family. The mean percentage (±SD) of cells expressing ARFS in 55 individuals was 19% (±11.4). The age did not affect the rate of expression. When the rate of expression was calculated separately in a group of mentally retarded (mean=23.4%) and in a group of mentally normal individuals (mean=16.0%), the difference was statistically significant.     

Heritable fragile sites on human chromosomes. IX. Population cytogenetics and segregation analysis of the BrdU-requiring fragile site at 10q25

The frequencies of the bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU)-requiring fragile site at 10q25 in 1,026 unselected neonates, 901 patients referred for chromosome studies, and 87 institutionalized retardates were not significantly different from each other. The gene frequency was .013, and the population was in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Segregation analysis confirmed that the fragile site followed codominant inheritance. This fragile site and its nonfragile allelomorph can be considered to constitute the first true chromosomal polymorphism to be described in man.     

Heritable fragile sites on human chromosomes

Summary A kindred is described in which six members have a fragile site at 12q13. This fragile site was found to be suppressed by folic acid and thymidine in lymphocyte culture. An updated classification of known fragile sites is presented.     

Induction of distamycin A-inducible rare fragile sites and increased sister chromatid exchanges at the fragile site

Summary Expression of distamycin A-inducible rare fragile sites by AT-specific DNA-ligands was examined in lymphoblastoid cell lines derived from heterozygous carriers for the fra(8)(q24), fra(16)(pl2), and fra(16)(q22) sites. The sensitivity of fragile site expression to the inducers was different at these fragile sites. The expression of fra(8)(q24) was induced markedly by Hoechst 33258, but not by distamycin A or berenil. An increased expression of fra(16)(p12) was found following treatment with Hoechst 33258 or berenil, but not with distamycin A. At fra(16)(q22), distamycin A markedly induced the fragile site, but Hoechst 33258 and berenil did not. Since their response to the different inducers was similar to that found in cultured lymphocytes, lymphoblastoid cell lines appear to retain their inherent properties. Although BrdUrd alone did nto induce any fragile sites, concomitant treatment with BrdUrd plus the inducer was synergistically effective in inducing all the fragile sites. An increased frequency of sister chromatid exchanges was observed at fra(16)(p12) following simultaneous treatment with BrdUrd and berenil, mainly when the site was expressed as an isochromatid gap. Thus, the induced fra (16)(pl2) site is a hot spot for the formation of sister chromatid exchanges, as found in other reported fragile sites.     

Neither age nor sex influence the expression of folate sensitive common fragile sites on human chromosomes

Summary The expression of folate sensitive common fragile sites was investigated in 82 normal healthy males and females of various ages. In 100 studied metaphases of each of these controls, between 0 and 56 lesions were detected (mean 18.3 ± 10.3 SD). No significant difference was found between the mean number of expressed lesions in females and males. No age-effects were observed. Two new common fragile sites were discovered at 6p21 and 17q21. Their fragile site status, however, needs to be confirmed.     

Induction of sister chromatid exchanges at common fragile sites.

Experiments were performed to gain further insight into chromosome structure and behavior at common fragile sites by testing the hypothesis that gaps at these sites predispose to intrachromosomal recombination as measured by sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs). Human lymphocytes were concurrently treated with aphidicolin, for determination of fragile site expression, and with 5-bromodeoxy-uridine, for SCE analysis. Aphidicolin induced chromosome gaps nonrandomly, with the great majority of gaps occurring at common fragile sites. On average, 66% of gaps were accompanied by an SCE at the site of the lesion. Analysis of two specific common fragile sites at 3p14 and 16q23 showed the same pattern; that is, on average 70% of gaps at these sites were accompanied by an SCE. These results show that common fragile sites are hot spots not only for chromosomal lesions such as gaps but also for SCE formation.     

Rare fragile sites

Rare folate-sensitive fragile sites are the archetypal trinucleotide repeats. Although the CAG repeat in the androgen receptor, associated with spinobulbar muscular atrophy, was the first to be published in 1991, it was the publication in the same year of the molecular basis of fragile X that focused much attention on trinucleotide repeat expansion as a mutational mechanism. A number of rare fragile sites have had their repeat elements characterised since that time. The so-called "folate-sensitive" fragile sites are likely to be all CCG repeat expansions similar to the fragile X. The folate insensitive fragile sites have more complex longer repeat elements. Only two rare fragile sites (FRAXA and FRAXE) are of unequivocal clinical significance in that they are associated with intellectual disability.     

Arabinofuranosyl nucleosides induce common fragile sites

Summary The capacities for fragile site induction of three inhibitors of semiconservative DNA synthesis and DNA repair synthesis, aphidicolin, arabinofuranosyl cytosine, and arabinofuranosyl adenosine were compared. Aphidicolin is known to induce type 4 fragile sites, the largest recognized group of common fragile sites. Although the modes of action of these inhibitors vary, both arabinofuranosyl analogs induce type 4 aphidicolin-sensitive fragile sites. An analysis of variance demonstrates that the three inhibitors are not equally capable of inducing significant breakage (P<0.01) at all type 4 fragile sites. Induction of type 4 fragile sites appears to be a general consequence of inhibition of DNA polymerization.     

Family study of common fragile sites

Summary The frequency of folate-sensitive common fragile sites (1p31, 1q44, 3p14, 3q26.2, 6q26, 16q23, Xp22.3) was determined in 19 healthy individuals from four families. The individuals consisted of 12 males and 7 females from 1 to 59 years of age. The frequency showed intrafamilial variation, but we were unable to demonstrate that the frequency was inherited in a Mendelian codominant fashion. In eight subjects whose chromosome 3 homologues could be distinguished by Q-band polymorphism, breakages at 3p14 occurred with equal frequencies on the homologues. Our study suggests that common fragile sites are a part of normal chromosome structure, and the frequency of their expression largely depends on environmental factors.     

Common fragile sites

Aphidicolin-induced common fragile sites are site-specific gaps or breaks seen on metaphase chromosomes after partial inhibition of DNA synthesis. These fragile sites were first recognized during the early studies of the fragile X syndrome and are induced by the same conditions of folate or thymidylate stress used to induce the fragile X site. Common fragile sites are normally stable in cultured human cells. However, following induction with replication inhibitors, they display a number of characteristics of unstable and highly recombinogenic DNA. From the many studies that have cloned and characterized fragile sites, it is now known that these sites extend over large regions, are associated with genes, exhibit late or delayed replication, and contain regions of high flexibility but are otherwise unremarkable in sequence. Studies showing that fragile sites and their associated genes are frequently deleted or rearranged in cancer cells have clearly demonstrated their importance in genome instability in tumorigenesis. Yet until recently, very little was known about the molecular mechanisms involved in their stability. Recent findings showing that the key checkpoint genes ATR and BRCA1 are critical for genome stability at fragile sites have shed new light on these mechanisms and on the biological significance of common fragile sites.     

Heritable fragile sites on human chromosomes

The fragile site at Xq27 which is associated with X-linked retardation with macroorchidism has been studied in 21 retarded males. These males were from 12 families, and studies of nine of the familes were possible. Detection of carrier females is difficult, especially with increasing age. The fragile site was demonstrated in only five of 13 obligate carrier females. It is concluded that using present methods, cytogenetic detection of carriers is fairly reliable in females aged less than 20--25 years but unreliable in older females.     

How common are common fragile sites in humans: interindividual variation in the distribution of aphidicolin-induced fragile sites

To obtain an estimate of the variation in common fragile sites (CFSs) among individuals, aphidicolin (APC)-induced chromosomal breakage data were analyzed for 20 karyotypically normal adult humans. As it is specifically designed to meet the analytical requirements for considering fragile sites as presence/absence characters in single individuals, the FSM methodology (B?hm et al., 1995) was used to statistically distinguish fragile from nonfragile sites. These analyses indicated that the APC-induced fragile sites are not ubiquitous but vary extensively among individuals; the per-individual number of fragile sites ranged from as few as seven to as many as 20. Of the 45 different sites identified as fragile, 19 (42%) occurred in more than half of the individuals, but only two sites (3p14 and 16q23) were fragile in all of the individuals; 12 (27% of the total) were fragile in single individuals only. Although these analyses provide statistical confirmation (and initial estimates of population variation) for 43 of the 88 APC-inducible fragile sites currently recognized as occurring among humans, they are consistent with the hypothesis that many of the currently recognized human CFSs have been erroneously identified. These results indicate the need for per-individual statistical identification of CFSs for larger samples of individuals and that studies of particular fragile sites should be conducted on individuals documented to be fragile at the loci under consideration.     

How common are common fragile sites: variation of aphidicolin-induced chromosomal fragile sites in a population of the deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus)

Aphidicolin (APC)-induced chromosomal gaps and breaks were analyzed for ten deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) from a natural population. The FSM statistical methodology was used to identify fragile sites as chromosomal loci exhibiting significantly non-random numbers of gaps/breaks in each individual and enabled an assessment of variation in fragile sites among the individuals. The individual deer mice exhibited as few as 7 to as many as 19 of the populational total of 34 sites. Two sites were fragile in all individuals and 13 sites were fragile in single individuals only. Defined by populational frequencies of greater than 50%, high-frequency fragile sites constituted 26% of the populational total. Approximately 35% of the total fragile sites were fragile in 20–40% of the population (low-frequency fragile sites) and about 38% were fragile in single individuals only. Analysis of the data pooled over all individuals identified significantly non-random breakage at 80 sites, 47 of which were not identified as fragile in any single individual. It appears, therefore, that fragile site identifications from pooled data have fostered an inflated estimate of the numbers and frequencies of common fragile sites. Comparison of the fragile site and spontaneous breakage (control) data suggest that APC-induced fragile sites represent regions of chromosomes that experience elevated levels of somatic mutation. Additionally, the occurrence of APC-induced fragile sites at or near the interstitial breakpoints of two pericentric-inversion polymorphisms in this population supports the hypothesis that fragile sites experience an increased rate of meiotic chromosomal mutation and are predisposed to undergo phylogenetic rearrangement. Received: 22 January 1997 / Accepted: 24 February 1997     

A common fragile site at Xq27: theoretical and practical implications.

The fragile site at Xq27 (FRAXA) is associated with a common form of X-linked mental retardation (Martin-Bell syndrome). It is induced in culture by conditions of thymidylate stress and is generally considered a rare fragile site found only in association with an X-linked form of mental retardation. Using a somatic cell hybrid system, we previously demonstrated that fragile-X expression can be induced by thymidylate stress in normal X chromosomes at low levels (4%-5%). In the present report, significantly higher levels of fragile-X expression (6%-28%) have been induced in lymphocytes or lymphoblasts of all seven control males using high doses of aphidicolin (1.5 microM). Similar high levels of expression (10%-12%) were observed in both of two normal male chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). These data demonstrate that Xq27 contains a common fragile site (FRAXD) that is ancestral to the divergence of man and the chimpanzee. Presence of a common and a rare fragile site in the same metaphase chromosome band does not prove that they are identical and may, in fact, represent two unrelated fragile sites. However, the possibility exists that the common fragile site at Xq27 may be the substrate for unequal recombination events that produces the rare fragile site associated with Martin-Bell syndrome. In addition, presence of a common fragile site at Xq27 may explain the occasional observation of low-frequency fragile-X expression in normal control individuals. Caution is therefore warranted in the interpretation of low-level fragile-X expression in diagnostic and prenatal diagnostic settings.     

Molecular basis for expression of common and rare fragile sites

Fragile sites are specific loci that form gaps, constrictions, and breaks on chromosomes exposed to partial replication stress and are rearranged in tumors. Fragile sites are classified as rare or common, depending on their induction and frequency within the population. The molecular basis of rare fragile sites is associated with expanded repeats capable of adopting unusual non-B DNA structures that can perturb DNA replication. The molecular basis of common fragile sites was unknown. Fragile sites from R-bands are enriched in flexible sequences relative to nonfragile regions from the same chromosomal bands. Here we cloned FRA7E, a common fragile site mapped to a G-band, and revealed a significant difference between its flexibility and that of nonfragile regions mapped to G-bands, similar to the pattern found in R-bands. Thus, in the entire genome, flexible sequences might play a role in the mechanism of fragility. The flexible sequences are composed of interrupted runs of AT-dinucleotides, which have the potential to form secondary structures and hence can affect replication. These sequences show similarity to the AT-rich minisatellite repeats that underlie the fragility of the rare fragile sites FRA16B and FRA10B. We further demonstrate that the normal alleles of FRA16B and FRA10B span the same genomic regions as the common fragile sites FRA16C and FRA10E. Our results suggest that a shared molecular basis, conferred by sequences with a potential to form secondary structures that can perturb replication, may underlie the fragility of rare fragile sites harboring AT-rich minisatellite repeats and aphidicolin-induced common fragile sites.     

Variation in the expression of aphidicolin-induced fragile sites in human lymphocyte cultures

Summary A correlation between specific fragile sites and cancer breakpoints has been suggested raising the question of fragile site expression as a predisposing factor in the occurrence of cancer in some persons. Before addressing the question of increased fragility among patients at high risk for cancer, we analyzed the variability of aphidicolin-induced fragile sites among nine normal persons and also among repeated samples from three of these individuals. Considerable variation in both the frequency and location of these fragile sites was observed and the data strongly suggest the significant variation of 6 of the 16 selected sites to be primarily due to sampling differences. These findings indicate that the use of fragile sites as a screening tool for patients at high risk of cancer should be carefully monitored relative to the variation inherent in both culture and individual expression.     

Common fragile sites as targets for chromosome rearrangements

Common fragile sites are large chromosomal regions that preferentially exhibit gaps or breaks after DNA synthesis is partially perturbed. Fragile site instability in cultured cells is well documented and includes gaps and breaks on metaphase chromosomes, translocation and deletions breakpoints, and sister chromosome exchanges. In recent years, much has been learned about the genomic structure at fragile sites and the cellular mechanisms that monitor their stability. The study of fragile sites has merged with that of cell cycle checkpoints and DNA repair, with multiple proteins from these pathways implicated in fragile site stability, including ATR, BRCA1, CHK1, and RAD51. Since their discovery, fragile sites have been implicated in constitutional and cancer chromosome rearrangements in vivo and recent studies suggest that common fragile sites may serve as markers of chromosome damage caused by replication stress during early tumorigenesis. Here we review the relationship of fragile sites to chromosome rearrangements, particularly in tumor cells, and discuss the mechanisms that may be involved.     

Common fragile sites in man and three closely related primate species

The expression of common fragile sites was studied in peripheral lymphocytes of man, gorilla, chimpanzee, and orangutan after induction with aphidicolin, methotrexate, or fluorodeoxyuridine. As far as the chromosomal localization is concerned, it appears that many of these sites have been highly conserved during primate evolution. However, differences were found in the relative expression of certain sites. In all four species, mapping of approximately 500 lesions disclosed the most breakage-prone common fragile sites, at which about 90% of all induced aberrations were localized. Comparison of chromosome regions involved in evolutionary changes to fragile sites in the four primate species revealed 30 sites that were located at or close to the same chromosomal band. However, no correlation was found between the relative expression of a certain common fragile site in vitro and a potential involvement of this chromosomal site in evolutionary changes.