A cell cycle and mutational analysis of anchorage-independent growth: cell adhesion and TGF-beta 1 control G1/S transit specifically

We have examined cell cycle control of anchorage-independent growth in nontransformed fibroblasts. In previous studies using G0-synchronized NRK and NIH-3T3 cells, we showed that anchorage-independent growth is regulated by an attachment-dependent transition at G1/S that resembles the START control point in the cell cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In the studies reported here, we have synchronized NRK and NIH-3T3 fibroblasts immediately after this attachment-dependent transition to determine if other portions of the fibroblast cell cycle are similarly regulated by adhesion. Our results show that S-, G2-, and M-phase progression proceed in the absence of attachment. Thus, we conclude that the adhesion requirement for proliferation of these cells can be explained in terms of the single START-like transition. In related studies, we show that TGF-beta 1 overrides the attachment-dependent transition in NRK and AKR-2B fibroblasts (lines in which TGF-beta 1 induces anchorage-independent growth), but not in NIH-3T3 or Balb/c 3T3 fibroblasts (lines in which TGF-beta 1 fails to induce anchorage- independent growth). These results show that (a) adhesion and TGF-beta 1 can have similar effects in stimulating cell cycle progression from G1 to S and (b) the differential effects of TGF-beta 1 on anchorage- independent growth of various fibroblast lines are directly reflected in the differential effects of the growth factor at G1/S. Finally, we have randomly mutagenized NRK fibroblasts to generate mutant lines that have lost their attachment/TGF-beta 1 requirement for G1/S transit while retaining their normal mitogen requirements for proliferation. These clones, which readily proliferate in mitogen-supplemented soft agar, appear non-transformed in monolayer: they are well spread, nonrefractile, and contact inhibited. The existence of this new fibroblast phenotype demonstrates (a) that the growth factor and adhesion/TGF-beta 1 requirements for cell cycle progression are genetically separable, (b) that the two major control points in the fibroblast cell cycle (G0/G1 and G1/S) are regulated by distinct extracellular signals, and (c) that the genes regulating anchorage- independent growth need not be involved in regulating contact inhibition, focus formation, or growth factor dependence.     

Rho-associated kinase connects a cell cycle-controlling anchorage signal to the mammalian target of rapamycin pathway

When deprived of anchorage to the extracellular matrix, fibroblasts arrest in G(1) phase at least in part due to inactivation of G(1) cyclin-dependent kinases. Despite great effort, how anchorage signals control the G(1)-S transition of fibroblasts remains highly elusive. We recently found that the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) cascade might convey an anchorage signal that regulates S phase entry. Here, we show that Rho-associated kinase connects this signal to the TSC1/TSC2-RHEB-mTOR pathway. Expression of a constitutively active form of ROCK1 suppressed all of the anchorage deprivation effects suppressible by tsc2 mutation in rat embryonic fibroblasts. TSC2 contains one evolutionarily conserved ROCK target-like sequence, and an alanine substitution for Thr(1203) in this sequence severely impaired the ability of ROCK1 to counteract the anchorage loss-imposed down-regulation of both G(1) cell cycle factors and mTORC1 activity. Moreover, TSC2 Thr(1203) underwent ROCK-dependent phosphorylation in vivo and could be phosphorylated by bacterially expressed active ROCK1 in vitro, providing biochemical evidence for a direct physical interaction between ROCK and TSC2.     

Retinoblastoma susceptibility gene product (pRb) and p107 functionally separate the requirements for serum and anchorage in the cell cycle G1-phase

Growth factors and cell anchorage are both required for cell cycle G(1)-phase progression, but it is unclear whether their function is mediated through the same set of cell cycle components and whether they are both required during the same periods of time. We separately analyzed the requirements of serum and anchorage during G(1)-phase progression and found that human dermal fibroblasts as well as wild type, pRb(-/-), and p107(-/-) mouse embryonic fibroblasts needed serum (growth factors) until mid-G(1)-phase but required cell anchorage until late G(1)-phase to be competent for S-phase entry. Importantly, however, pRb/p107 double-null mouse embryonic fibroblasts lacked serum requirement in mid-G(1)-phase but still required cell anchorage until late G(1)-phase to enter S-phase. Our results indicate that pRb and p107 do not constitute the last control point for extracellular factors during G(1)-phase progression, and they functionally separate the requirements for serum and cell anchorage in terms of involved cell cycle components.     

Methylmercury effects on cell cycle kinetics

Methylmercury (MeHg) effects on cell cycle kinetics were investigated to help identify its mechanisms of action. Flow cytometric analysis of normal human fibroblasts grown in vitro in the presence of BrdU allowed quantitation of the proportion of cells in G1, S, G2 and the next G1 phase. This technique provides a rapid and easily performed method of characterizing phase lengths and transition rates for the complete cell cycle. After first exposure to MeHg the cell cycle time was lengthened due to a prolonged G1. At 3 microM MeHg the G1 phase length was 25% longer than the control. The G1/S transition rate was also decreased in a dose-related manner. Confluent cells exposed to MeHg and replated with MeHg respond in the same way as cells which have not been exposed to MeHg before replating. Cells exposed for long times to MeHg lost a detectable G1 effect, and instead showed an increase in the G2 percentage, which was directly related to MeHg concentration and length of exposure. After 8 days at 5 microM MeHg, 45% of the population was in G2. The G2 accumulation was reversible up to 3 days, but at 6 days the cells remained in G2 when the MeHg was removed. Cell counts and viability indicated that there was not a selective loss of cells from the MeHg. MeHg has multiple effects on the cell cycle which include a lengthened G1 and decreased transition probability after short term exposure of cycling cells, and a G2 accumulation after a longer term exposure. There were no detectable S phase effects. It appears that mitosis (the G2 accumulation) and probably synthesis of some macromolecules in G1 (the lengthened G1 and lowered transition probability) are particularly susceptible to MeHg.     

Inhibition of mitogenic activity of PDGF, EGF, and FGF by interferon-gamma

Natural or recombinant human interferon-gamma abolishes the mitogenic activity of platelet-derived growth factor, epidermal growth factor, and fibroblast growth factor on GM2767 or FS-4 human fibroblasts. Similarly murine interferon-gamma abolishes the mitogenic activity of these growth factors on BALB/C-3T3 fibroblasts. Inhibition of DNA synthesis by interferon-gamma was accomplished by blocking the transition of G0/G1 to S phase of the cell cycle. Addition of interferon-gamma 15 h after the addition of growth factors (when the cells had already entered the S phase) had no effect on DNA synthesis.     

Cell cycle traverse and protein metabolism in human NHIK 3025 cells: the role of anchorage

We have studied the effect of cell anchorage on the human cell line NHIK 3025 in vitro, to see whether the growth regulating effect of cell anchorage primarily affected DNA division cycle or mass growth cycle. It was found that cell to cell anchorage had the same effect on cell cycle progression as anchorage to a solid surface, which indicates that it is anchorage per se and not cell shape that is important for growth control in NHIK 3025 cells. When NHIK 3025 cells were grown without attachment to a solid surface, both G1 and cell cycle duration was prolonged by 6 h, which means that the prolonged cell cycle was due to a prolonged G1. During the first part of the cell cycle the rate of protein synthesis and degradation was constant, and at the same level in cells grown with and without attachment. This means that the prolonged G1 was not due to a reduced protein accumulation or mass growth. Towards the end of the cell cycle protein accumulation was reduced. This effect was either due to a size control before cell division or a secondary effect of the prolonged G1. We therefore conclude that cell anchorage as a growth regulator primarily affects the DNA/cell division cycle.     

Spy1 interacts with p27Kip1 to allow G1/S progression

Progression through the G1/S transition commits cells to synthesize DNA. Cyclin dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) is the major kinase that allows progression through G1/S phase and subsequent replication events. p27 is a CDK inhibitor (CKI) that binds to CDK2 to prevent premature activation of this kinase. Speedy (Spy1), a novel cell cycle regulatory protein, has been found to prematurely activate CDK2 when microinjected into Xenopus oocytes and when expressed in mammalian cells. To determine the mechanism underlying Spy1-induced proliferation in mammalian cell cycle regulation, we used human Spy1 as bait in a yeast two-hybrid screen to identify interacting proteins. One of the proteins isolated was p27; this novel interaction was confirmed both in vitro, using bacterially expressed and in vitro translated proteins, and in vivo, through the examination of endogenous and transfected proteins in mammalian cells. We demonstrate that Spy1 expression can overcome a p27-induced cell cycle arrest to allow for DNA synthesis and CDK2 histone H1 kinase activity. In addition, we utilized p27-null cells to demonstrate that the proliferative effect of Spy1 depends on the presence of endogenous p27. Our data suggest that Spy1 associates with p27 to promote cell cycle progression through the G1/S transition.     

The Mammalian Cell Cycle Regulates Parvovirus Nuclear Capsid Assembly

It is unknown whether the mammalian cell cycle could impact the assembly of viruses maturing in the nucleus. We addressed this question using MVM, a reference member of the icosahedral ssDNA nuclear parvoviruses, which requires cell proliferation to infect by mechanisms partly understood. Constitutively expressed MVM capsid subunits (VPs) accumulated in the cytoplasm of mouse and human fibroblasts synchronized at G0, G1, and G1/S transition. Upon arrest release, VPs translocated to the nucleus as cells entered S phase, at efficiencies relying on cell origin and arrest method, and immediately assembled into capsids. In synchronously infected cells, the consecutive virus life cycle steps (gene expression, proteins nuclear translocation, capsid assembly, genome replication and encapsidation) proceeded tightly coupled to cell cycle progression from G0/G1 through S into G2 phase. However, a DNA synthesis stress caused by thymidine irreversibly disrupted virus life cycle, as VPs became increasingly retained in the cytoplasm hours post-stress, forming empty capsids in mouse fibroblasts, thereby impairing encapsidation of the nuclear viral DNA replicative intermediates. Synchronously infected cells subjected to density-arrest signals while traversing early S phase also blocked VPs transport, resulting in a similar misplaced cytoplasmic capsid assembly in mouse fibroblasts. In contrast, thymidine and density arrest signals deregulating virus assembly neither perturbed nuclear translocation of the NS1 protein nor viral genome replication occurring under S/G2 cycle arrest. An underlying mechanism of cell cycle control was identified in the nuclear translocation of phosphorylated VPs trimeric assembly intermediates, which accessed a non-conserved route distinct from the importin α2/β1 and transportin pathways. The exquisite cell cycle-dependence of parvovirus nuclear capsid assembly conforms a novel paradigm of time and functional coupling between cellular and virus life cycles. This junction may determine the characteristic parvovirus tropism for proliferative and cancer cells, and its disturbance could critically contribute to persistence in host tissues.     

Simian virus 40 large T antigen affects the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle and interacts with p34CDC28.

Simian virus 40 tumor (T) antigen, an established viral oncoprotein, causes alterations in cell growth control through interacting with, and altering the function of, cellular proteins. To examine the effects of T antigen on cell growth control, and to identify the cellular proteins with which it may functionally interact, T antigen was expressed in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The yeast cells expressing T antigen showed morphological alterations as well as growth inhibition attributable, at least in part, to a lag in progression from G1 to S. This point in the cell cycle is also known to be affected by T antigen in mammalian cells. Both p34CDC28 and p34CDC2Hs were shown to bind to a chimeric T antigen-glutathione S-transferase fusion protein, indicating that T antigen interacts directly with cell cycle proteins which control the G1 to S transition. This interaction was confirmed by in vivo cross-linking experiments, in which T antigen and p34CDC28 were coimmunoprecipitated from extracts of T-antigen-expressing yeast cells. These immunoprecipitated complexes could phosphorylate histone H1, indicating that kinase activity was retained. In addition, in autophosphorylation reactions, the complexes phosphorylated a novel 60-kDa protein which appeared to be underphosphorylated (or underrepresented) in p34CDC28-containing complexes from cells which did not express T antigen. These results suggest that T antigen interacts with p34CDC28 and alters the kinase function of p34CDC28-containing complexes. These events correlate with alterations in the yeast cell cycle at the G1 to S transition.     

Human NDR kinases control G(1)/S cell cycle transition by directly regulating p21 stability

The G(1) phase of the cell cycle is an important integrator of internal and external cues, allowing a cell to decide whether to proliferate, differentiate, or die. Multiple protein kinases, among them the cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks), control G(1)-phase progression and S-phase entry. With the regulation of apoptosis, centrosome duplication, and mitotic chromosome alignment downstream of the HIPPO pathway components MST1 and MST2, mammalian NDR kinases have been implicated to function in cell cycle-dependent processes. Although they are well characterized in terms of biochemical regulation and upstream signaling pathways, signaling mechanisms downstream of mammalian NDR kinases remain largely unknown. We identify here a role for human NDR in regulating the G(1)/S transition. In G(1) phase, NDR kinases are activated by a third MST kinase (MST3). Significantly, interfering with NDR and MST3 kinase expression results in G(1) arrest and subsequent proliferation defects. Furthermore, we describe the first downstream signaling mechanisms by which NDR kinases regulate cell cycle progression. Our findings suggest that NDR kinases control protein stability of the cyclin-Cdk inhibitor protein p21 by direct phosphorylation. These findings establish a novel MST3-NDR-p21 axis as an important regulator of G(1)/S progression of mammalian cells.     

Cell cycle regulation of human diploid fibroblasts: possible mechanisms of platelet-derived growth factor

Cell-cycle regulation of human diploid fibroblasts (HDF) is located in the proximal half of G1, designated G1-pm (G1-postmitosis). In order to traverse this subphase, cells require serum factors or PDGF. However, when cells have traversed into the distal half of G1, designated G1-ps (G1-pre-DNA synthesis), they become independent of serum or PDGF and progress through the remainder of the cell cycle at an invariable rate. From this, it follows that a specific G1-pm block can be induced by serum depletion. A similar G1-pm block could also be induced by a moderate inhibition of overall protein synthesis following treatment with CHM. Even this block could be prevented by the addition of PDGF, suggesting that a high level of protein synthesis in itself is not necessary for sustaining cell-cycle traverse. Nevertheless, a critical accumulation of some specific proteins might be required for the G1-pm/G1-ps-transition. However, the underlying mechanisms of modulation of the accumulation of such proteins by PDGF must involve alternative regulatory events (e.g., gene expression, protein stabilization) rather than protein synthesis. Among the possible cell cycle-regulatory proteins, the present study focused on 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG CoA) reductase. This enzyme is regulated by various kinds of control mechanisms and regulates the biosynthesis of sterols and nonsterol isoprenes, some of which are proposed to be necessary for mammalian cell growth (Brown and Goldstein, 1980). The present results suggest that regulation of HMG CoA reductase may be involved in the control of the G1-pm/G1-ps-progression in HDF.     

D-type cyclin-dependent kinase activity in mammalian cells.

D-type cyclin-dependent kinase activities have not so far been detected in mammalian cells. Lysis of rodent fibroblasts, mouse macrophages, or myeloid cells with Tween 20 followed by precipitation with antibodies to cyclins D1, D2, and D3 or to their major catalytic partner, cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (cdk4), yielded kinase activities in immune complexes which readily phosphorylated the retinoblastoma protein (pRb) but not histone H1 or casein. Virtually all cyclin D1-dependent kinase activity in proliferating macrophages and fibroblasts could be attributed to cdk4. When quiescent cells were stimulated by growth factors to enter the cell cycle, cyclin D1-dependent kinase activity was first detected in mid G1, reached a maximum near the G1/S transition, and remained elevated in proliferating cells. The rate of appearance of kinase activity during G1 phase lagged significantly behind cyclin induction and correlated with the more delayed accumulation of cdk4 and formation of cyclin D1-cdk4 complexes. Thus, cyclin D1-associated kinase activity was not detected during the G0-to-G1 transition, which occurs within the first few hours following growth factor stimulation. Rodent fibroblasts engineered to constitutively overexpress either cyclin D1 alone or cyclin D3 together with cdk4 exhibited greatly elevated cyclin D-dependent kinase activity, which remained absent in quiescent cells but rose to supraphysiologic levels as cells progressed through G1. Therefore, despite continued enforced overproduction of cyclins and cdk4, the assembly of cyclin D-cdk4 complexes and the appearance of their kinase activities remained dependent upon serum stimulation, indicating that upstream regulators must govern formation of the active enzymes.     

Control of Cyclin D1, p27Kip1, and Cell Cycle Progression in Human Capillary Endothelial Cells by Cell Shape and Cytoskeletal Tension

The extracellular matrix (ECM) plays an essential role in the regulation of cell proliferation during angiogenesis. Cell adhesion to ECM is mediated by binding of cell surface integrin receptors, which both activate intracellular signaling cascades and mediate tension-dependent changes in cell shape and cytoskeletal structure. Although the growth control field has focused on early integrin and growth factor signaling events, recent studies suggest that cell shape may play an equally critical role in control of cell cycle progression. Studies were carried out to determine when cell shape exerts its regulatory effects during the cell cycle and to analyze the molecular basis for shape-dependent growth control. The shape of human capillary endothelial cells was controlled by culturing cells on microfabricated substrates containing ECM-coated adhesive islands with defined shape and size on the micrometer scale or on plastic dishes coated with defined ECM molecular coating densities. Cells that were prevented from spreading in medium containing soluble growth factors exhibited normal activation of the mitogen-activated kinase (erk1/erk2) growth signaling pathway. However, in contrast to spread cells, these cells failed to progress through G1 and enter S phase. This shape-dependent block in cell cycle progression correlated with a failure to increase cyclin D1 protein levels, down-regulate the cell cycle inhibitor p27^Kip1, and phosphorylate the retinoblastoma protein in late G1. A similar block in cell cycle progression was induced before this same shape-sensitive restriction point by disrupting the actin network using cytochalasin or by inhibiting cytoskeletal tension generation using an inhibitor of actomyosin interactions. In contrast, neither modifications of cell shape, cytoskeletal structure, nor mechanical tension had any effect on S phase entry when added at later times. These findings demonstrate that although early growth factor and integrin signaling events are required for growth, they alone are not sufficient. Subsequent cell cycle progression and, hence, cell proliferation are controlled by tension-dependent changes in cell shape and cytoskeletal structure that act by subjugating the molecular machinery that regulates the G1/S transition.     

Drastic rise of intracellular adenosine(5')tetraphospho(5')adenosine correlates with onset of DNA synthesis in eukaryotic cells

An assay of adenosine(5')tetraphospho(5')adenosine (Ap4A), based on the luciferin/luciferase method for ATP measurement, was developed, which allows one to determine picomolar amounts of unlabeled Ap4A in cellular extracts. In eukaryotic cells this method yielded levels of Ap4A varying from 0.01 microM to 13 microM depending on the growth, cell cycle, transformation, and differentiation state of cells. After mitogenic stimulation of G1-arrested mouse 3T3 and baby hamster kidney fibroblasts the Ap4A pools gradually increased 1000-fold during progression through the G1 phase reaching maximum Ap4A concentrations of about 10 microM in the S phase. Quiescent 3T3 cells reach a high level of Ap4A (1 microM) in a 'committed' but prereplicative state if exposed to an external mitogenic stimulant (excess of serum) and simultaneously to a synchronizer which inhibits entry into the S phase (hydroxyurea). When the block for DNA replication was removed at varying times after removal of the stimulant decay of commitment to DNA synthesis was found correlated with a shrinkage of the Ap4A pool. Cells lacking a defined G1 phase (V79 lung fibroblasts, Physarum) possess a constitutively high base level of Ap4A (about 0.3 microM) even during mitosis. From this high level, Ap4A concentration increases only about tenfold during the S phase. Temperature-down-shift experiments, using chick embryo cells infected with transformation-defective temperature-sensitive viral mutants(td-ts), have shown that the expression of the transformed state at 35 degrees C is accompanied by a tenfold increase of the cellular Ap4A pool. Treatment of exponentially growing human cells with interferon leads, concomitantly with an inhibition of DNA syntheses, to a tenfold decrease in intracellular Ap4A levels within 20 h. The possibility of Ap4A being a 'second messenger' of cell cycle and proliferation control is discussed in the light of these results and those reported previously demonstrating that Ap4A is a ligand of mammalian DNA polymerase alpha, triggers DNA replication in quiescent mammalian cells and is active in priming DNA synthesis.     

Synchronization of human diploid fibroblasts at multiple stages of the cell cycle

Because of the scarcity of techniques for synchronizing the growth of cultured human diploid fibroblasts at multiple stages within the cell cycle, efforts were expended in this report to establish a set of protocols that would permit synchronization of cells at several different points throughout the cycle. The protocols that were developed to synchronize the growth of HSF-24 and HSF-55 cells, human foreskin-derived fibroblast cultures, were modifications of procedures employed to synchronize the growth of cultured rodent cells. Optimization of synchrony induction was directed by consideration of both the biochemical properties of the synchronized populations (determined via three-parameter flow cytometric measurements of DNA, RNA, and protein contents) and their kinetic behavior following reversal of the synchronization-inducing blockade (determined via combined flow cytometric analysis of DNA content, [3H]thymidine autoradiography, and measurement of increase in cell number). The conditions judged to yield the best results for studying events associated with production of a G0 block or for maintaining cells for prolonged periods in G0 were those in which the cells were grown to confluency in D-MEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. Procedures producing the best results for studying processes associated with the G0 to G1 transition, G1 events, and operations accompanying the transition from G1 to S, employed subconfluent growth for 48 h in alpha-MEM + 0.1% fetal bovine serum (alpha-MEM0.1F) followed by resuspension in alpha-MEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum (alpha-MEM10F). When the goal was to obtain cells in which to study very early S-phase events, satisfactory results were achieved by combining a 48-h period of subconfluent growth in alpha-MEM0.1F, followed by treatment for 24 h in alpha-MEM10F containing 5 micrograms/ml aphidicolin. For study of events occurring in mid- to late-cycle, acceptable results were achieved by combining a 48-h block in alpha-MEM0.1F with resuspension for 24 h in alpha-MEM10F containing 10(-3) M hydroxyurea followed by resuspension in drug-free alpha-MEM10F. The best results were obtained with these latter synchronization procedures (i.e., low-serum/high-serum + APC or HU/high serum) when the fetal calf serum was replaced with heat-inactivated calf serum. The success achieved in synchronizing the growth of these human diploid fibroblasts compared favorably/exceeded the results obtained with synchronized cultures of Chinese hamster ovary cells.     

Human cytomegalovirus infection inhibits G1/S transition.

Cell cycle progression during cytomegalovirus infection was investigated by fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis of the DNA content in growth-arrested as well as serum-stimulated human fibroblasts. Virus-infected cells maintained in either low (0.2%) or high (10%) serum failed to progress into S phase and failed to divide. DNA content analysis in the presence of G1/S (hydroxyurea and mimosine) and G2/M (nocodazole and colcemid) inhibitors demonstrated that upon virus infection of quiescent (G0) cells, the cell cycle did not progress beyond the G1/S border even after serum stimulation. Proteins which normally indicate G1/S transition (proliferating cell nuclear antigen [PCNA]) or G2/M transition (cyclin B1) were elevated by virus infection. PCNA levels were induced in infected cells and exhibited a punctate pattern of nuclear staining instead of the diffuse pattern observed in mock-infected cells. Cyclin B1 was induced in infected cells which exhibited a G1/S DNA content by FACS analysis, suggesting that expression of this key cell cycle function was dramatically altered by viral functions. These data demonstrate that contrary to expectations, cytomegalovirus inhibits normal cell cycle progression. The host cell is blocked prior to S phase to provide a favorable environment for viral replication.     

Schlafen-1 causes a cell cycle arrest by inhibiting induction of cyclin D1

Schlafen-1 (Slfn-1), the prototypic member of the Schlafen family of proteins, was described as an inducer of growth arrest in T-lymphocytes and causes a cell cycle arrest in NIH3T3 fibroblasts prior to the G1/S transition. How Slfn-1 exerts its effects on the cell cycle is not currently known. We report that synchronized murine fibroblasts expressing Slfn-1 do not exit G1 when stimulated with fetal calf serum, platelet-derived growth factor BB (PDGF-BB) or epidermal growth factor (EGF). The induction of cyclin D1 by these stimuli was blocked in the presence of Slfn-1 as were all downstream cell cycle processes. Overexpression of cyclin D1 in growth-arrested, Slfn-1-expressing cells induced an increase in cell growth consistent with this protein being the biological target of Slfn-1. Activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway by EGF or phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate was unaffected by Slfn-1 expression. PDGF signaling was, however, almost completely blocked. This was due to a lack of PDGF receptor expression in Slfn-1-expressing cells consistent with Slfn-1 blocking the cell cycle in G1 where PDGF receptor expression is normally down-regulated. Finally, overexpression of Slfn-1 inhibited the activation of the cyclin D1 promoter. Slfn-1 therefore causes a cell cycle arrest during G1 by inhibiting induction of cyclin D1 by mitogens.