Advances in Pattern Formation: Signaling and Transcription

Key Words: Wingless, Pair-Rule, FGF, Regeneration, Extracellular Matrix The 49th annual Drosophila research conference was held in the sunny confines of San Diego. As usual, large numbers of Drosophila scientists working in fields as different as immunology and evolution descended on the venue. The meeting showed that the fly community is still vibrant and diverse even with the funding crunch at the NIH and the renewed rumors that Drosophila may have outlived its usefulness. This short review will focus on one session of platform presentations detailing the recent advances in the field of pattern formation. This session offered a variety of topics reviewing the formation of pattern in various tissues through diverse mechanisms. I will focus on early embryonic patterning through pair-rule genes, specificity of FGF signaling, and tissue regeneration.     

Differential Delta expression underlies the diversity of sensory organ patterns among the legs of the Drosophila adult

Many studies have shown that morphological diversity among homologous animal structures is generated by the homeotic (Hox) genes. However, the mechanisms through which Hox genes specify particular morphological features are not fully understood. We have addressed this issue by investigating how diverse sensory organ patterns are formed among the legs of the Drosophila melanogaster adult. The Drosophila adult has one pair of legs on each of its three thoracic segments (the T1-T3 segments). Although homologous, legs from different segments have distinct morphological features. Our focus is on the formation of diverse patterns of small mechanosensory bristles or microchaetae (mCs) among the legs. On T2 legs, the mCs are organized into a series of longitudinal rows (L-rows) precisely positioned along the leg circumference. The L-rows are observed on all three pairs of legs, but additional and novel pattern elements are found on T1 and T3 legs. For example, at specific positions on T1 and T3 legs, some mCs are organized into transverse rows (T-rows). Our studies indicate that the T-rows on T1 and T3 legs are established as a result of Hox gene modulation of the pathway for patterning the L-row mC bristles. Our findings suggest that the Hox genes, Sex combs reduced (Scr) and Ultrabithorax (Ubx), establish differential expression of the proneural gene achaete (ac) by modifying expression of the ac prepattern regulator, Delta (Dl), in T1 and T3 legs, respectively. This study identifies Dl as a potential link between Hox genes and the sensory organ patterning hierarchy, providing insight into the connection between Hox gene function and the formation of specific morphological features.     

Extracellular modulation of BMP activity in patterning the dorsoventral axis

Signaling via bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) regulates a vast array of diverse biological processes in the developing embryo and in postembryonic life. Many insights into BMP signaling derive from studies of the BMP signaling gradients that pattern cell fates along the embryonic dorsal-ventral (DV) axis of both vertebrates and invertebrates. This review examines recent developments in the field of DV patterning by BMP signaling, focusing on extracellular modulation as a key mechanism in the formation of BMP signaling gradients in Drosophila, Xenopus, and zebrafish.     

Peripodial cells regulate proliferation and patterning of Drosophila imaginal discs

Cells employ a diverse array of signaling mechanisms to establish spatial patterns during development. Nowhere is this better understood than in Drosophila, where the limbs and eyes arise from discrete epithelial sacs called imaginal discs. Molecular-genetic analyses of pattern formation have generally treated discs as single epithelial sheets. Anatomically, however, discs comprise a columnar cell monolayer covered by a squamous epithelium known as the peripodial membrane. Here we demonstrate that during development, peripodial cells signal to disc columnar cells via microtubule-based apical extensions. Ablation and targeted gene misexpression experiments demonstrate that peripodial cell signaling contributes to growth control and pattern formation in the eye and wing primordia. These findings challenge the traditional view of discs as monolayers and provide foundational evidence for peripodial cell function in Drosophila appendage development.     

Vertebrate tinman homologues and cardiac differentiation.

In Drosophila, the homeobox gene tinman is required for specification of dorsal vessel and a number of mesodermal subtypes. Six tinman homologues have now been found in diverse vertebrate species: Nkx2-3, 2-5, 2-6, 2-7, 2-8 and 2-9. Of these, Nkx2-5 appears to be the mostly highly conserved among species, in terms of both primary protein sequence and mRNA expression pattern. Of the others, some have been found as yet only in a single species. Although expression patterns of vertebrate tinman homologues indicate that they may play a role in the specification of several mesodermal or endodermal tissues, to date most attention have been focussed on their role in cardiac development. Results of these studies indicate that, as for Drosophila tinman, vertebrate tinman homologues may be required for heart formation, but may not be sufficient. Studies in Drosophila are defining other pathways which are required in concert with tinman for dorsal vessel formation. Circumstantial evidence suggests that similar pathways may be operative in vertebrate heart formation. This review summarizes recent advances in our understanding of vertebrate tinman homologues and interacting genetic pathways.     

p24 proteins, intracellular trafficking, and behavior: Drosophila melanogaster provides insights and opportunities

The p24 transmembrane proteins, also known as EMP24/GP25 (endomembrane protein precursor of 24kD (Schimmoller et al., 1995)) proteins, are components of coat protein (COP)-coated vesicles and are present in species as diverse as fungi, plants, flies, worms, and mammals, indicating that they have important conserved functions. Genetic, molecular, and biochemical characterization of these proteins and the loci that encode them has provided insights into their potential cellular roles, including postulated functions in vesicle cargo protein selection and sorting, COPI and COPII vesicle formation and budding, and quality control of proteins that mature through the secretory pathway. Recently, the first mutations in a Drosophila melanogaster p24 gene have been isolated and characterized. These alleles produce an interesting behavioral phenotype in females, affecting their ability to oviposit. This identification and mutant characterization of a p24 locus in Drosophila will pave the way for a better understanding of cell-type-specific functions and interactions among p24 proteins.     

Germ cell specification and early embryonic patterning in Bombyx mori as revealed by nanos orthologues

In the silkmoth Bombyx mori, the germ cells first appear from the posterior ventral side of the egg (from within the mesodermal primordium) after blastoderm formation. This is in contrast to Drosophila, where germ cells appear at the posterior pole before cellular blastoderm formation. To date, germ plasm has not been found in B. mori. In this study, we describe the identification and expression pattern of nanos from B. mori, in which we recovered four nanos orthologues. One orthologue showed strong expression in embryonic germ cells, which was traced back to periplasmic granules dispersed on the ventral midline of the egg from the posterior-ventral focus of preblastoderm embryos. This suggests that, in B. mori, as in dipterans, germ cell formation depends on a localized determinant in the egg. The expression of another orthologue was observed in the posterior of the germ band. We speculate that nanos has dual functions; one in germ cell formation and the other in posterior body patterning, which is conferred by one nanos gene in Drosophila, but is assigned to different genes in B. mori.     

A simulation study of the genetic regulatory hierarchy for butterfly eyespot focus determination

The color patterns on the wings of butterflies have been an important model system in evolutionary developmental biology. Two types of models have been used to study these patterns. The first type of model employs computational techniques and generalized mechanisms of pattern formation to make predictions about how color patterns will vary as parameters of the model are changed. These generalized mechanisms include diffusion gradient, reaction-diffusion, lateral inhibition, and threshold responses. The second type of model uses known genetic interactions from Drosophila melanogaster and patterns of candidate gene expression in one of several butterfly species (most often Junonia (Precis) coenia or Bicyclus anynana) to propose specific genetic regulatory hierarchies that appear to be involved in color pattern formation. This study combines these two approaches using computational techniques to test proposed genetic regulatory hierarchies for the determination of butterfly eyespot foci (also known as border ocelli foci). Two computer programs, STELLA 8.1 and Delphi 2.0, were used to simulate the determination of eyespot foci. Both programs revealed weaknesses in a genetic model previously proposed for eyespot focus determination. On the basis of these simulations, we propose two revised models for eyespot focus determination and identify components of the genetic regulatory hierarchy that are particularly sensitive to changes in model parameter values. These components may play a key role in the evolution of butterfly eyespots. Simulations like these may be useful tools for the study of other evolutionary developmental model systems and reveal similar sensitive components of the relevant genetic regulatory hierarchies.     

Systems-level questions in Drosophila oogenesis

This paper describes computational and experimental work on pattern formation in Drosophila egg development (oogenesis), an established experimental model for studying cell fate diversification in developing tissues. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a key regulator of pattern formation and morphogenesis in Drosophila oogenesis. EGFR signalling in oogenesis can be genetically manipulated and monitored at many levels, leading to large sets of heterogeneous data that enable the formulation of increasingly quantitative models of pattern formation in these systems.     

My what big eyes you have: how the Drosophila retina grows

The compound eye of the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, has for decades been used extensively to study a number of critical developmental processes including tissue development, pattern formation, cell fate specification, and planar cell polarity. To a lesser degree it has been used to examine the cell cycle and tissue proliferation. Discovering the mechanisms that balance tissue growth and cell death in developing epithelia has traditionally been the realm of those using the wing disc. However, over the last decade a series of observations has demonstrated that the eye is a suitable and maybe even preferable tissue for studying tissue growth. This review will focus on how growth of the retina is controlled by the genes and pathways that govern the specification of tissue fate, the division of the epithelium into dorsal-ventral compartments, the initiation, and progression of the morphogenetic furrow and the second mitotic wave.     

Translational control in oocyte development

Translational control of specific mRNAs is a widespread mechanism of gene regulation, and it is especially important in pattern formation in the oocytes of organisms in which the embryonic axes are established maternally. Drosophila and Xenopus have been especially valuable in elucidating the relevant molecular mechanisms. Here, we comprehensively review what is known about translational control in these two systems, focusing on examples that illustrate key concepts that have emerged. We focus on protein-mediated translational control, rather than regulation mediated by small RNAs, as the former appears to be predominant in controlling these developmental events. Mechanisms that modulate the ability of the specific mRNAs to be recruited to the ribosome, that regulate polyadenylation of specific mRNAs, or that control the association of particular mRNAs into translationally inert ribonucleoprotein complexes will all be discussed.     

Gastrointestinal development in the Drosophila embryo requires the activity of innexin gap junction channel proteins

Cell to cell communication plays an essential role during pattern formation and morphogenesis of the diverse tissues and organs of the body. In invertebrates, such as the fruitfly Drosophila, the direct communication of closely apposed cells is mediated by gap junctions which are composed of oligomers of the innexin family of transmembrane channel proteins. Few data exist about the developmental role of the eight innexin genes which have been found in the Drosophila genome. We have investigated the role of the innexin 2 and ogre genes during gastrointestinal development of the fly embryo. Our findings suggest that innexins are involved in the formation of the proventriculus, an organ that develops at the foregut/midgut boundary by migration of primordial cells and subsequent infolding of epithelial tissue layers.     

Gastrointestinal Development in the Drosophila Embryo Requires the Activity of Innexin Gap Junction Channel Proteins

Cell to cell communication plays an essential role during pattern formation and morphogenesis of the diverse tissues and organs of the body. In invertebrates, such as the fruitfly Drosophila, the direct communication of closely apposed cells is mediated by gap junctions which are composed of oligomers of the innexin family of transmembrane channel proteins. Few data exist about the developmental role of the eight innexin genes which have been found in the Drosophila genome. We have investigated the role of the innexin 2 and ogre genes during gastrointestinal development of the fly embryo. Our findings suggest that innexins are involved in the formation of the proventriculus, an organ that develops at the foregut/midgut boundary by migration of primordial cells and subsequent infolding of epithelial tissue layers.     

The BAR domain protein PICK1 regulates cell recognition and morphogenesis by interacting with Neph proteins

Neph proteins are evolutionarily conserved membrane proteins of the immunoglobulin superfamily that control the formation of specific intercellular contacts. Cell recognition through these proteins is essential in diverse cellular contexts such as patterning of the compound eye in Drosophila melanogaster, neuronal connectivity in Caenorhabditis elegans, and the formation of the kidney filtration barrier in mammals. Here we identify the PDZ and BAR domain protein PICK1 (protein interacting with C-kinase 1) as a Neph-interacting protein. Binding required dimerization of PICK1, was dependent on PDZ domain protein interactions, and mediated stabilization of Neph1 at the plasma membrane. Moreover, protein kinase C (PKCα) activity facilitated the interaction through releasing Neph proteins from their binding to the multidomain scaffolding protein zonula occludens 1 (ZO-1), another PDZ domain protein. In Drosophila, the Neph homologue Roughest is essential for sorting of interommatidial precursor cells and patterning of the compound eye. RNA interference-mediated knockdown of PICK1 in the Drosophila eye imaginal disc caused a Roughest destabilization at the plasma membrane and a phenotype that resembled rst mutation. These data indicate that Neph proteins and PICK1 synergistically regulate cell recognition and contact formation.     

Reaction-diffusion microtubule concentration patterns occur during biological morphogenesis.

Reaction-diffusion processes can lead to a macroscopic concentration pattern from an initially homogeneous solution, and thus provide a physical-chemical mechanism for biological pattern formation and morphogenesis. The central prediction of reaction-diffusion theory is that the patterns contain periodic concentration variations in some of the reactives. Microtubules assembled in vitro spontaneously self-organise and form stationary striped macroscopic structures. In agreement with reaction-diffusion theory. Here we show, in agreement with reaction-diffusion theory, that these preparations contain substantial microtubule concentration variations. Similar striped microtubule patterns arise during Drosophila embryogenesis. A characteristic of these patterns is their dependence on sample dimensions. In Drosophila eggs shortened by ligation, we found that the microtubule pattern varied with egg fragment length in the same way as the in vitro microtubule pattern varied with sample length, and as expected from theory. This is evidence that reaction-diffusion structures occur during Drosophila morphogenesis.     

Intracellular trafficking in Drosophila visual system development: a basis for pattern formation through simple mechanisms

Intracellular trafficking underlies cellular functions ranging from membrane remodeling to receptor activation. During multicellular organ development, these basic cell biological functions are required as both passive machinery and active signaling regulators. Exocytosis, endocytosis, and recycling of several key signaling receptors have long been known to actively regulate morphogenesis and pattern formation during Drosophila eye development. Hence, intracellular membrane trafficking not only sets the cell biological stage for receptor-mediated signaling but also actively controls signaling through spatiotemporally regulated receptor localization. In contrast to eye development, the role of intracellular trafficking for the establishment of the eye-to-brain connectivity map has only recently received more attention. It is still poorly understood how guidance receptors are spatiotemporally regulated to serve as meaningful synapse formation signals. Yet, the Drosophila visual system provides some of the most striking examples for the regulatory role of intracellular trafficking during multicellular organ development. In this review we will first highlight the experimental and conceptual advances that motivate the study of intracellular trafficking during Drosophila visual system development. We will then illuminate the development of the eye, the eye-to-brain connectivity map and the optic lobe from the perspective of cell biological dynamics. Finally, we provide a conceptual framework that seeks to explain how the interplay of simple genetically encoded intracellular trafficking events governs the seemingly complex cellular behaviors, which in turn determine the developmental product.     

A microfluidic array for large-scale ordering and orientation of embryos

Quantitative studies of embryogenesis require the ability to monitor pattern formation and morphogenesis in large numbers of embryos, at multiple time points and in diverse genetic backgrounds. We describe a simple approach that greatly facilitates these tasks for Drosophila melanogaster embryos, one of the most advanced models of developmental genetics. Based on passive hydrodynamics, we developed a microfluidic embryo-trap array that can be used to rapidly order and vertically orient hundreds of embryos. We describe the physical principles of the design and used this platform to quantitatively analyze multiple morphogen gradients in the dorsoventral patterning system. Our approach can also be used for live imaging and, with slight modifications, could be adapted for studies of pattern formation and morphogenesis in other model organisms.