Photoperiod differentially regulates circadian oscillators in central and peripheral tissues of the Syrian hamster

In many seasonally breeding rodents, reproduction and metabolism are activated by long summer days (LD) and inhibited by short winter days (SD). After several months of SD, animals become refractory to this inhibitory photoperiod and spontaneously revert to LD-like physiology. The suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) house the primary circadian oscillator in mammals. Seasonal changes in photic input to this structure control many annual physiological rhythms via SCN-regulated pineal melatonin secretion, which provides an internal endocrine signal representing photoperiod. We compared LD- and SD-housed animals and show that the waveform of SCN expression for three circadian clock genes (Per1, Per2, and Cry2) is modified by photoperiod. In SD-refractory (SD-R) animals, SCN and melatonin rhythms remain locked to SD, reflecting ambient photoperiod, despite LD-like physiology. In peripheral oscillators, Per1 and Dbp rhythms are also modified by photoperiod but, in contrast to the SCN, revert to LD-like, high-amplitude rhythms in SD-R animals. Our data suggest that circadian oscillators in peripheral organs participate in photoperiodic time measurement in seasonal mammals; however, circadian oscillators operate differently in the SCN. The clear dissociation between SCN and peripheral oscillators in refractory animals implicates intermediate factor(s), not directly driven by the SCN or melatonin, in entrainment of peripheral clocks.     

Entrainment of circadian clocks in mammals by arousal and food

Circadian rhythms in mammals are regulated by a system of endogenous circadian oscillators (clock cells) in the brain and in most peripheral organs and tissues. One group of clock cells in the hypothalamic SCN (suprachiasmatic nuclei) functions as a pacemaker for co-ordinating the timing of oscillators elsewhere in the brain and body. This master clock can be reset and entrained by daily LD (light-dark) cycles and thereby also serves to interface internal with external time, ensuring an appropriate alignment of behavioural and physiological rhythms with the solar day. Two features of the mammalian circadian system provide flexibility in circadian programming to exploit temporal regularities of social stimuli or food availability. One feature is the sensitivity of the SCN pacemaker to behavioural arousal stimulated during the usual sleep period, which can reset its phase and modulate its response to LD stimuli. Neural pathways from the brainstem and thalamus mediate these effects by releasing neurochemicals that inhibit retinal inputs to the SCN clock or that alter clock-gene expression in SCN clock cells. A second feature is the sensitivity of circadian oscillators outside of the SCN to stimuli associated with food intake, which enables animals to uncouple rhythms of behaviour and physiology from LD cycles and align these with predictable daily mealtimes. The location of oscillators necessary for food-entrained behavioural rhythms is not yet certain. Persistence of these rhythms in mice with clock-gene mutations that disable the SCN pacemaker suggests diversity in the molecular basis of light- and food-entrainable clocks.     

Light pulses do not induce c-fos or per1 in the SCN of hamsters that fail to reentrain to the photocycle

Circadian activity rhythms of most Siberian hamsters (Phodopus sungorus sungorus) fail to reentrain to a 5-h phase shift of the light-dark (LD) cycle. Instead, their rhythms free-run at periods close to 25 h despite the continued presence of the LD cycle. This lack of behavioral reentrainment necessarily means that molecular oscillators in the master circadian pacemaker, the SCN, were unable to reentrain as well. The authors tested the hypothesis that a phase shift of the LD cycle rendered the SCN incapable of responding to photic input. Animals were exposed to a 5-h phase delay of the photocycle, and activity rhythms were monitored until a lack of reentrainment was confirmed. Hamsters were then housed in constant darkness for 24 h and administered a 30-min light pulse 2 circadian hours after activity onset. Brains were then removed, and tissue sections containing the SCN were processed for in situ hybridization. Sections were probed with Siberian hamster c-fos and per1 mRNA probes because light rapidly induces these 2 genes in the SCN during subjective night but not at other circadian phases. Light pulses induced robust expression of both genes in all animals that reentrained to the LD cycle, but no expression was observed in any animal that failed to reentrain. None of the animals exhibited an intermediate response. This finding is the first report of acute shift in a photocycle eliminating photosensitivity in the SCN and suggests that a specific pattern of light exposure may desensitize the SCN to subsequent photic input.     

Simulation of circadian rhythm generation in the suprachiasmatic nucleus with locally coupled self-sustained oscillators

In mammals, circadian rhythms are driven by a pacemaker located in the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) of the anterior hypothalamus. The firing rate of neurons within the SCN exhibits a circadian rhythm. There is evidence that individual neurons within the SCN act as circadian oscillators. Rhythm generation in the SCN was therefore modeled by a system of self-sustained oscillators. The model is composed of up to 10000 oscillatory elements arranged in a square array. Each oscillator has its own (randomly determined) intrinsic period reflecting the widely dispersed periods observed in the SCN. The model behavior was investigated mainly in the absence of synchronizing zeitgebers. Due to local coupling the oscillators synchronized and an overall rhythm emerged. This indicates that a locally coupled system is capable of integrating the output of individual clock cells with widely dispersed periods. The period of the global output (average of all oscillators) corresponded to the average of the intrinsic periods and was stable even for small amplitudes and during transients. Noise, reflecting biological fluctuations at the cellular level, distorted the global rhythm in small arrays. The period of the rhythm could be stabilized by increasing the array size, which thus increased the robustness against noise. Since different regions of the SCN have separate output pathways, the array of oscillators was subdivided into four quadrants. Sudden deviations of periodicity sometimes appeared in one quadrant, while the periods of the other quadrants were largely unaffected. This result could represent a model for splitting, which has been observed in animal experiments. In summary, the multi-oscillator model of the SCN showed a broad repertoire of dynamic patterns, revealed a stable period (even during transients) with robustness against noise, and was able to account for such a complex physiological behavior as splitting.     

Forced desynchronization model for a diurnal primate

The circadian system is organized in a hierarchy of multiple oscillators, with the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) as the master oscillator in mammals. The SCN is formed by a group of coupled cell oscillators. Knowledge of this coupling mechanism is essential to understanding entrainment and the expression of circadian rhythms. Some authors suggest that light-dark (LD) cycles with periods near the limit of entrainment may be good models for promoting internal desynchronization, providing knowledge about the coupling mechanism. As such, we evaluated the circadian activity rhythm (CAR) pattern of marmosets in LD cycles at lower limits of entrainment in order to study induced internal dissociation. To that end, two experiments were conducted: (1) 6 adult females were under symmetrical LD cycles T21, T22 and T21.5 for 60, 35 and 48 days, respectively; and (2) 4 male and 4 female adults were under T21 for 24 days followed by 18 days of LL, back to T21 for 24 days, followed by 14 days of LL. The CAR of each animal was continuously recorded. In experiment 1, vocalizations were also recorded. Under Ts shorter than 24 days, a dissociation pattern was observed for CAR and vocalizations. Two simultaneous circadian components emerged, one with the same period as the LD cycle, called the light-entrained component, and the other in free-running, denominated the non-light-entrained component. Both components were displayed in the CAR for all the animals in T21, five animals (83.3%) in T21.5 and two animals (33.3%) in T22. Our results are in accordance with the multioscillatory nature of the circadian system. Dissociation is partial synchronization to the LD cycle, with at least one group of oscillators synchronized by relative coordination and masking, while another group of oscillators free runs, but is also masked by the LD cycle. Since only T21 promoted the emergence of both circadian components in the circadian rhythms of all marmosets, it was considered the promoter period of circadian rhythm dissociation in this species, and is proposed as a good animal model for forced desynchronization in non-human diurnal primates.     

In vivo monitoring of peripheral circadian clocks in the mouse

The mammalian circadian system is comprised of a central clock in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) and a network of peripheral oscillators located in all of the major organ systems. The SCN is traditionally thought to be positioned at the top of the hierarchy, with SCN lesions resulting in an arrhythmic organism. However, recent work has demonstrated that the SCN and peripheral tissues generate independent circadian oscillations in Per1 clock gene expression in vitro. In the present study, we sought to clarify the role of the SCN in the intact system by recording rhythms in clock gene expression in vivo. A practical imaging protocol was developed that enables us to measure circadian rhythms easily, noninvasively, and longitudinally in individual mice. Circadian oscillations were detected in the kidney, liver, and submandibular gland studied in about half of the SCN-lesioned, behaviorally arrhythmic mice. However, their amplitude was decreased in these organs. Free-running periods of peripheral clocks were identical to those of activity rhythms recorded before the SCN lesion. Thus, we can report for the first time that many of the fundamental properties of circadian oscillations in peripheral clocks in vivo are maintained in the absence of SCN control.     

Spontaneous synchronization of coupled circadian oscillators

In mammals, the circadian pacemaker, which controls daily rhythms, is located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). Circadian oscillations are generated in individual SCN neurons by a molecular regulatory network. Cells oscillate with periods ranging from 20 to 28 h, but at the tissue level, SCN neurons display significant synchrony, suggesting a robust intercellular coupling in which neurotransmitters are assumed to play a crucial role. We present a dynamical model for the coupling of a population of circadian oscillators in the SCN. The cellular oscillator, a three-variable model, describes the core negative feedback loop of the circadian clock. The coupling mechanism is incorporated through the global level of neurotransmitter concentration. Global coupling is efficient to synchronize a population of 10,000 cells. Synchronized cells can be entrained by a 24-h light-dark cycle. Simulations of the interaction between two populations representing two regions of the SCN show that the driven population can be phase-leading. Experimentally testable predictions are: 1), phases of individual cells are governed by their intrinsic periods; and 2), efficient synchronization is achieved when the average neurotransmitter concentration would dampen individual oscillators. However, due to the global neurotransmitter oscillation, cells are effectively synchronized.     

Entrainment of split circadian activity rhythms in hamsters

Hamsters that showed splitting of their circadian rhythms of wheel-running activity following long-term exposure to constant illumination (LL) were exposed to light-dark (LD) cycles with 2-hr dark segments, and with periods of 24.00, 24.23 or 24.72 hr. For comparison, hamsters showing nonsplit rhythms were also studied. In all cases of split rhythms, at least one of the two split components entrained to the LD cycles. In some animals, the second component continued to free-run until it merged with the entrained component, while in others, the second component also entrained to the LD cycle but maintained a stable phase angle of 6-14.5 hr relative to dark onset. These results were obtained in cases where the period of the LD cycle was shorter than that of the split rhythms and in cases where it was longer, implying that split components can be phase-advanced as well as phase-delayed by 2 hr of darkness. Three hamsters that showed stable entrainment of split rhythms were allowed to free-run in LL. The LD cycles were then reinstated, but instead of overlapping with the first component, as it did before, the dark segment was timed to overlap with the second. The entrainment patterns that ensued were similar to the ones obtained during the first LD exposure, indicating that the two split components respond to darkness in a qualitatively similar fashion. These results are further evidence that the pacemaker system underlying split circadian activity rhythms in hamsters is composed of two mutually coupled populations of oscillators that have similar properties, including a bidirectional phase response curve. Such a dual-oscillator organization may also underlie normal, or nonsplit, activity rhythms, as suggested by Pittendrigh and Daan (1976c), but the data are also compatible with the alternative view that the circadian pacemaker consists of a large number of coupled oscillators, which only dissociate into two separate populations in some animals under conditions of moderate LL intensity.     

A neural clockwork for encoding circadian time.

Many daily biological rhythms are governed by an innate timekeeping mechanism or clock. Endogenous, temperature-compensated circadian clocks have been localized to discrete sites within the nervous systems of a number of organisms. In mammals, the master circadian pacemaker is the bilaterally paired suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) in the anterior hypothalamus. The SCN is composed of multiple single cell oscillators that must synchronize to each other and the environmental light schedule. Other tissues, including those outside the nervous system, have also been shown to express autonomous circadian periodicities. This review examines 1) how intracellular regulatory molecules function in the oscillatory mechanism and in its entrainment to environmental cycles; 2) how individual SCN cells interact to create an integrated tissue pacemaker with coherent metabolic, electrical, and secretory rhythms; and 3) how such clock outputs are converted into temporal programs for the whole organism.     

Intrinsic regulation of spatiotemporal organization within the suprachiasmatic nucleus

The mammalian pacemaker in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) contains a population of neural oscillators capable of sustaining cell-autonomous rhythms in gene expression and electrical firing. A critical question for understanding pacemaker function is how SCN oscillators are organized into a coherent tissue capable of coordinating circadian rhythms in behavior and physiology. Here we undertake a comprehensive analysis of oscillatory function across the SCN of the adult PER2::LUC mouse by developing a novel approach involving multi-position bioluminescence imaging and unbiased computational analyses. We demonstrate that there is phase heterogeneity across all three dimensions of the SCN that is intrinsically regulated and extrinsically modulated by light in a region-specific manner. By investigating the mechanistic bases of SCN phase heterogeneity, we show for the first time that phase differences are not systematically related to regional differences in period, waveform, amplitude, or brightness. Furthermore, phase differences are not related to regional differences in the expression of arginine vasopressin and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide, two key neuropeptides characterizing functionally distinct subdivisions of the SCN. The consistency of SCN spatiotemporal organization across individuals and across planes of section suggests that the precise phasing of oscillators is a robust feature of the pacemaker important for its function.     

Effects of preparation time on phase of cultured tissues reveal complexity of circadian organization

The phases of central (SCN) and peripheral circadian oscillators are held in specific relationships under LD cycles but, in the absence of external rhythmic input, may damp or drift out of phase with each other. Rats exposed to prolonged constant light become behaviorally arrhythmic, perhaps as a consequence of dissociation of phases among SCN cells. The authors asked whether individual central and peripheral circadian oscillators were rhythmic in LL-treated arrhythmic rats and, if rhythmic, what were the phase relationships between them. The authors prepared SCN, pineal gland, pituitary, and cornea cultures from transgenic Period1-luciferaserats whose body temperature and locomotor activity were arrhythmic and from several groups of rhythmic rats held in LD, DD, and short-term LL. The authors measured mPer1gene expression by recording light output with sensitive photomultipliers. Most of the cultures from all groups displayed circadian rhythms. This could reflect persistent rhythmicity in vivo prior to culture or, alternatively, rhythmicity that may have been initiated by the culture procedure. To test this, the authors cultured tissues at 2 different times 12 h apart and asked whether phase of the rhythm was related to culture time. The pineal, pituitary, and SCN cultures showed partial or complete dependence of phase on culture time, while peak phases of the cornea cultures were independent of culture time in rhythmic rats and were randomly distributed regardless of culture time in arrhythmic animals. These results suggest that in behaviorally arrhythmic rats, oscillators in the pineal, pituitary, and SCN had been arrhythmic or severely damped in vivo, while the cornea oscillator was free running. The peak phases of the SCN cultures were particularly sensitive to some aspect of the culture procedure since rhythmicity of SCN cultures from robustly rhythmic LD-entrained rats was strongly influenced when the procedure was carried out at any time except the 2nd half of the day.     

Light induces c-fos and per1 expression in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of arrhythmic hamsters

Locomotor activity rhythms in a significant proportion of Siberian hamsters (Phodopus sungorus sungorus) become arrhythmic after the light-dark (LD) cycle is phase-delayed by 5 h. Arrhythmia is apparent within a few days and persists indefinitely despite the presence of the photocycle. The failure of arrhythmic hamsters to regain rhythms while housed in the LD cycle, as well as the lack of any masking of activity, suggested that the circadian system of these animals had become insensitive to light. We tested this hypothesis by examining light-induced gene expression in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). Several weeks after the phase delay, arrhythmic and re-entrained hamsters were housed in constant darkness (DD) for 24 h and administered a 30-min light pulse 2 h after predicted dark onset because light induces c-fos and per1 genes at this time in entrained animals. Brains were then removed, and tissue sections containing the SCN were processed for in situ hybridization and probed with c-fos and per1 mRNA probes made from Siberian hamster cDNA. Contrary to our prediction, light pulses induced robust expression of both c-fos and per1 in all re-entrained and arrhythmic hamsters. A separate group of animals held in DD for 10 days after the light pulse remained arrhythmic. Thus, even though the SCN of these animals responded to light, neither the LD cycle nor DD restored rhythms, as it does in other species made arrhythmic by constant light (LL). These results suggest that different mechanisms underlie arrhythmicity induced by LL or by a phase delay of the LD cycle. Whereas LL induces arrhythmicity by desynchronizing SCN neurons, phase delay-induced arrhythmicity may be due to a loss of circadian rhythms at the level of individual SCN neurons.     

Come together, right...now: synchronization of rhythms in a mammalian circadian clock

In mammals, the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) of the hypothalamus act as a dominant circadian pacemaker, coordinating rhythms throughout the body and regulating daily and seasonal changes in physiology and behavior. This review focuses on the mechanisms that mediate synchronization of circadian rhythms between SCN neurons. Understanding how these neurons communicate as a network of circadian oscillators has begun to shed light on the adaptability and dysfunction of the brain's master clock.     

Weakly Circadian Cells Improve Resynchrony

The mammalian suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) contain thousands of neurons capable of generating near 24-h rhythms. When isolated from their network, SCN neurons exhibit a range of oscillatory phenotypes: sustained or damping oscillations, or arrhythmic patterns. The implications of this variability are unknown. Experimentally, we found that cells within SCN explants recover from pharmacologically-induced desynchrony by re-establishing rhythmicity and synchrony in waves, independent of their intrinsic circadian period We therefore hypothesized that a cell''s location within the network may also critically determine its resynchronization. To test this, we employed a deterministic, mechanistic model of circadian oscillators where we could independently control cell-intrinsic and network-connectivity parameters. We found that small changes in key parameters produced the full range of oscillatory phenotypes seen in biological cells, including similar distributions of period, amplitude and ability to cycle. The model also predicted that weaker oscillators could adjust their phase more readily than stronger oscillators. Using these model cells we explored potential biological consequences of their number and placement within the network. We found that the population synchronized to a higher degree when weak oscillators were at highly connected nodes within the network. A mathematically independent phase-amplitude model reproduced these findings. Thus, small differences in cell-intrinsic parameters contribute to large changes in the oscillatory ability of a cell, but the location of weak oscillators within the network also critically shapes the degree of synchronization for the population.     

Circadian Locomotor Activity Rhythm in the Freshwater Crab Pseudothelphusa americana (De Saussure, 1857): Effect of Eyestalk Ablation

The circadian rhythm of locomotor activity in the freshwater crab, Pseudothelphusa americana , was studied in aquaria using infrared crossing sensors. Individuals with ablated eyestalks were compared with intact individuals in constant darkness (DD) and in light-dark cycles (LD). Our results showed that intact animals in DD displayed bimodal rhythms. In LD conditions the two peaks were associated with lights on and lights off, respectively. A significant difference in the free running periods before and after LD was observed in all intact animals. After eyestalk ablation (ES-X), the circadian rhythm of locomotor activity disappeared immediately, but reappeared several days later. Diurnal activity was seen in some ES-X animals when exposed to LD. Our results indicate that locomotor activity rhythm in P. americana is driven primarily by oscillators located outside the eyestalks, and that extraretinal photoreceptors mediate either entrainment or masking effects.     

Circadian Locomotor Activity Rhythm in the Freshwater Crab Pseudothelphusa americana (De Saussure, 1857): Effect of Eyestalk Ablation

The circadian rhythm of locomotor activity in the freshwater crab, Pseudothelphusa americana, was studied in aquaria using infrared crossing sensors. Individuals with ablated eyestalks were compared with intact individuals in constant darkness (DD) and in light-dark cycles (LD). Our results showed that intact animals in DD displayed bimodal rhythms. In LD conditions the two peaks were associated with lights on and lights off, respectively. A significant difference in the free running periods before and after LD was observed in all intact animals. After eyestalk ablation (ES-X), the circadian rhythm of locomotor activity disappeared immediately, but reappeared several days later. Diurnal activity was seen in some ES-X animals when exposed to LD. Our results indicate that locomotor activity rhythm in P. americana is driven primarily by oscillators located outside the eyestalks, and that extraretinal photoreceptors mediate either entrainment or masking effects.     

Effects of Illumination on the Circadian Motor Rhythm of the Chelipeds of Crayfish

The effects of different illumination conditions on the main parameters of the circadian motor rhythms of the two chelipeds of the crayfish, Procambarus digueti , were compared. Under either constant darkness (DD) or constant light (LL) the phase relationship between the two circadian rhythms was more stable than under entrained conditions (LD cycles). These results suggest that the oscillators responsible for these rhythms differ in their sensitivity to light. The role of paired organs in the internal temporal order of the crayfish is discussed.     

Effects of Illumination on the Circadian Motor Rhythm of the Chelipeds of Crayfish

The effects of different illumination conditions on the main parameters of the circadian motor rhythms of the two chelipeds of the crayfish, Procambarus digueti, were compared. Under either constant darkness (DD) or constant light (LL) the phase relationship between the two circadian rhythms was more stable than under entrained conditions (LD cycles). These results suggest that the oscillators responsible for these rhythms differ in their sensitivity to light. The role of paired organs in the internal temporal order of the crayfish is discussed.     

Intercellular coupling confers robustness against mutations in the SCN circadian clock network

Molecular mechanisms of the mammalian circadian clock have been studied primarily by genetic perturbation and behavioral analysis. Here, we used bioluminescence imaging to monitor Per2 gene expression in tissues and cells from clock mutant mice. We discovered that Per1 and Cry1 are required for sustained rhythms in peripheral tissues and cells, and in neurons dissociated from the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN). Per2 is also required for sustained rhythms, whereas Cry2 and Per3 deficiencies cause only period length defects. However, oscillator network interactions in the SCN can compensate for Per1 or Cry1 deficiency, preserving sustained rhythmicity in mutant SCN slices and behavior. Thus, behavior does not necessarily reflect cell-autonomous clock phenotypes. Our studies reveal previously unappreciated requirements for Per1, Per2, and Cry1 in sustaining cellular circadian rhythmicity and demonstrate that SCN intercellular coupling is essential not only to synchronize component cellular oscillators but also for robustness against genetic perturbations.