Structure of dystrophia myotonica protein kinase

Dystrophia myotonica protein kinase (DMPK) is a serine/threonine kinase composed of a kinase domain and a coiled‐coil domain involved in the multimerization. The crystal structure of the kinase domain of DMPK bound to the inhibitor bisindolylmaleimide VIII (BIM‐8) revealed a dimeric enzyme associated by a conserved dimerization domain. The affinity of dimerisation suggested that the kinase domain alone is insufficient for dimerisation in vivo and that the coiled‐coil domains are required for stable dimer formation. The kinase domain is in an active conformation, with a fully‐ordered and correctly positioned αC helix, and catalytic residues in a conformation competent for catalysis. The conserved hydrophobic motif at the C‐terminal extension of the kinase domain is bound to the N‐terminal lobe of the kinase domain, despite being unphosphorylated. Differences in the arrangement of the C‐terminal extension compared to the closely related Rho‐associated kinases include an altered PXXP motif, a different conformation and binding arrangement for the turn motif, and a different location for the conserved NFD motif. The BIM‐8 inhibitor occupies the ATP site and has similar binding mode as observed in PDK1.     

Apo raver1 structure reveals distinct RRM domain orientations

Raver1 is a multifunctional protein that modulates both alternative splicing and focal adhesion assembly by binding to the nucleoplasmic splicing repressor polypyrimidine tract protein (PTB) or to the cytoskeletal proteins vinculin and α‐actinin. The amino‐terminal region of raver1 has three RNA recognition motif (RRM1, RRM2, and RRM3) domains, and RRM1 interacts with the vinculin tail (Vt) domain and vinculin mRNA. We previously determined the crystal structure of the raver1 RRM1–3 domains in complex with Vt at 2.75 Å resolution. Here, we report crystal structure of the unbound raver1 RRM1–3 domains at 2 Å resolution. The apo structure reveals that a bound sulfate ion disrupts an electrostatic interaction between the RRM1 and RRM2 domains, triggering a large relative domain movement of over 30°. Superposition with other RNA‐bound RRM structures places the sulfate ion near the superposed RNA phosphate group suggesting that this is the raver1 RNA binding site. While several single and some tandem RRM domain structures have been described, to the best of our knowledge, this is the second report of a three‐tandem RRM domain structure.     

Unusual binding interactions in PDZ domain crystal structures help explain binding mechanisms

PDZ domains most commonly bind the C‐terminus of their protein targets. Typically the C‐terminal four residues of the protein target are considered as the binding motif, particularly the C‐terminal residue (P0) and third‐last residue (P‐2) that form the major contacts with the PDZ domain's “binding groove”. We solved crystal structures of seven human PDZ domains, including five of the seven PDLIM family members. The structures of GRASP, PDLIM2, PDLIM5, and PDLIM7 show a binding mode with only the C‐terminal P0 residue bound in the binding groove. Importantly, in some cases, the P‐2 residue formed interactions outside of the binding groove, providing insight into the influence of residues remote from the binding groove on selectivity. In the GRASP structure, we observed both canonical and noncanonical binding in the two molecules present in the asymmetric unit making a direct comparison of these binding modes possible. In addition, structures of the PDZ domains from PDLIM1 and PDLIM4 also presented here allow comparison with canonical binding for the PDLIM PDZ domain family. Although influenced by crystal packing arrangements, the structures nevertheless show that changes in the positions of PDZ domain side‐chains and the αB helix allow noncanonical binding interactions. These interactions may be indicative of intermediate states between unbound and fully bound PDZ domain and target protein. The noncanonical “perpendicular” binding observed potentially represents the general form of a kinetic intermediate. Comparison with canonical binding suggests that the rearrangement during binding involves both the PDZ domain and its ligand.     

Surface plasmon resonance analysis of the binding of high‐risk mucosal HPV E6 oncoproteins to the PDZ1 domain of the tight junction protein MAGI‐1

The E6 oncoproteins from high‐risk mucosal human papillomavirus (HPV) induce cervical cancer via two major activities, the binding and the degradation of the p53 protein and PDZ domain‐containing proteins. Human MAGI‐1 is a multi‐PDZ domain protein implicated into protein complex assembly at cell–cell contacts. High‐risk mucosal HPV E6 proteins interact with the PDZ1 domain of MAGI‐1 via a C‐terminal consensus binding motif. Here, we developed a medium throughput protocol to accurately measure by surface plasmon resonance affinity constants of protein domains binding to peptidic sequences produced as recombinant fusions to the glutathione‐S‐transferase (GST). This approach was applied to measure the binding of MAGI‐1 PDZ1 to the C‐termini of viral or cellular proteins. Both high‐risk mucosal HPV E6 C‐terminal peptides and cellular partners of MAGI‐1 PDZ1 bind to MAGI‐1 PDZ1 with comparable dissociation constants in the micromolar range. MAGI‐1 PDZ1 shows a preference for C‐termini with a valine at position 0 and a negative charge at position ?3, confirming previous studies performed with HPV18 E6. A detailed combined analysis via site‐directed mutagenesis of the HPV16 C‐terminal peptide and PDZ1 indicated that interactions mediated by charged residues upstream the PDZ‐binding motif strongly contribute to binding selectivity of this interaction. In addition, our work highlighted the K₄₉₉ residue of MAGI‐1 as a novel determinant of binding specificity. Finally, we showed that MAGI‐1 PDZ1 also binds to the C‐termini of LPP and Tax proteins, which were already known to bind to PDZ proteins but not to MAGI‐1. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

High‐resolution structural analysis shows how different crystallographic environments can induce alternative modes of binding of a phosphotyrosine peptide to the SH2 domain of Fer tyrosine kinase

Fes and Fes‐related (Fer) protein tyrosine kinases (PTKs) comprise a subfamily of nonreceptor tyrosine kinases characterized by a unique multidomain structure composed of an N‐terminal Fer/CIP4 homology‐Bin/Amphiphysin/Rvs (F‐BAR) domain, a central Src homology 2 (SH2) domain, and a C‐terminal PTK domain. Fer is ubiquitously expressed, and upregulation of Fer has been implicated in various human cancers. The PTK activity of Fes has been shown to be positively regulated by the binding of phosphotyrosine‐containing ligands to the SH2 domain. Here, the X‐ray crystal structure of human Fer SH2 domain bound to a phosphopeptide that has D‐E‐pY‐E‐N‐V‐D sequence is reported at 1.37 å resolution. The asymmetric unit (ASU) contains six Fer‐phosphopeptide complexes, and the structure reveals three distinct binding modes for the same phosphopeptide. At four out of the six binding sites in the ASU, the phosphopeptide binds to Fer SH2 domain in a type I β‐turn conformation, and this could be the optimal binding mode of this phosphopeptide. At the other two binding sites in the ASU, it appears that spatial proximity of neighboring SH2 domains in the crystal induces alternative modes of binding of this phosphopeptide.     

The flexible C‐terminal arm of the Lassa arenavirus Z‐protein mediates interactions with multiple binding partners

The arenavirus genome encodes for a Z‐protein, which contains a RING domain that coordinates two zinc ions, and has been identified as having several functional roles at various stages of the virus life cycle. Z‐protein binds to multiple host proteins and has been directly implicated in the promotion of viral budding, repression of mRNA translation, and apoptosis of infected cells. Using homology models of the Z‐protein from Lassa strain arenavirus, replica exchange molecular dynamics (MD) was used to refine the structures, which were then subsequently clustered. Population‐weighted ensembles of low‐energy cluster representatives were predicted based upon optimal agreement of the chemical shifts computed with the SPARTA program with the experimental NMR chemical shifts. A member of the refined ensemble was indentified to be a potential binder of budding factor Tsg101 based on its correspondence to the structure of the HIV‐1 Gag late domain when bound to Tsg101. Members of these ensembles were docked against the crystal structure of human eIF4E translation initiation factor. Two plausible binding modes emerged based upon their agreement with experimental observation, favorable interaction energies and stability during MD trajectories. Mutations to Z are proposed that would either inhibit both binding mechanisms or selectively inhibit only one mode. The C‐terminal domain conformation of the most populated member of the representative ensemble shielded protein‐binding recognition motifs for Tsg101 and eIF4E and represents the most populated state free in solution. We propose that C‐terminal flexibility is key for mediating the different functional states of the Z‐protein. Proteins 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Structure of the F‐spondin domain of mindin,an integrin ligand and pattern recognition molecule

Mindin (spondin‐2) is an extracellular matrix protein of unknown structure that is required for efficient T‐cell priming by dendritic cells. Additionally, mindin functions as a pattern recognition molecule for initiating innate immune responses. These dual functions are mediated by interactions with integrins and microbial pathogens, respectively. Mindin comprises an N‐terminal F‐spondin (FS) domain and C‐terminal thrombospondin type 1 repeat (TSR). We determined the structure of the FS domain at 1.8‐Å resolution. The structure revealed an eight‐stranded antiparallel β‐sandwich motif resembling that of membrane‐targeting C2 domains, including a bound calcium ion. We demonstrated that the FS domain mediates integrin binding and identified the binding site by mutagenesis. The mindin FS domain therefore represents a new integrin ligand. We further showed that mindin recognizes lipopolysaccharide (LPS) through its TSR domain, and obtained evidence that C‐mannosylation of the TSR influences LPS binding. Through these dual interactions, the FS and TSR domains of mindin promote activation of both adaptive and innate immune responses.     

The colicin Ia receptor,Cir, is also the translocator for colicin Ia

Colicin Ia, a channel‐forming bactericidal protein, uses the outer membrane protein, Cir, as its primary receptor. To kill Escherichia coli, it must cross this membrane. The crystal structure of Ia receptor‐binding domain bound to Cir, a 22‐stranded plugged β‐barrel protein, suggests that the plug does not move. Therefore, another pathway is needed for the colicin to cross the outer membrane, but no ‘second receptor’ has ever been identified for TonB‐dependent colicins, such as Ia. We show that if the receptor‐binding domain of colicin Ia is replaced by that of colicin E3, this chimera effectively kills cells, provided they have the E3 receptor (BtuB), Cir, and TonB. This is consistent with wild‐type Ia using one Cir as its primary receptor (BtuB in the chimera) and a second Cir as the translocation pathway for its N‐terminal translocation (T) domain and its channel‐forming C‐terminal domain. Deletion of colicin Ia's receptor‐binding domain results in a protein that kills E. coli, albeit less effectively, provided they have Cir and TonB. We show that purified T domain competes with Ia and protects E. coli from being killed by it. Thus, in addition to binding to colicin Ia's receptor‐binding domain, Cir also binds weakly to its translocation domain.     

Distinct modes of recruitment of the CCR4–NOT complex by Drosophila and vertebrate Nanos

Nanos proteins repress the expression of target mRNAs by recruiting effector complexes through non‐conserved N‐terminal regions. In vertebrates, Nanos proteins interact with the NOT1 subunit of the CCR4–NOT effector complex through a NOT1 interacting motif (NIM), which is absent in Nanos orthologs from several invertebrate species. Therefore, it has remained unclear whether the Nanos repressive mechanism is conserved and whether it also involves direct interactions with the CCR4–NOT deadenylase complex in invertebrates. Here, we identify an effector domain (NED) that is necessary for the Drosophila melanogaster (Dm) Nanos to repress mRNA targets. The NED recruits the CCR4–NOT complex through multiple and redundant binding sites, including a central region that interacts with the NOT module, which comprises the C‐terminal domains of NOT1–3. The crystal structure of the NED central region bound to the NOT module reveals an unanticipated bipartite binding interface that contacts NOT1 and NOT3 and is distinct from the NIM of vertebrate Nanos. Thus, despite the absence of sequence conservation, the N‐terminal regions of Nanos proteins recruit CCR4–NOT to assemble analogous repressive complexes.     

Structural basis for endosomal recruitment of ESCRT-I by ESCRT-0 in yeast

The ESCRT‐0 and ESCRT‐I complexes coordinate the clustering of ubiquitinated cargo with intralumenal budding of the endosomal membrane, two essential steps in vacuolar/lysosomal protein sorting from yeast to humans. The 1.85‐Å crystal structure of interacting regions of the yeast ESCRT‐0 and ESCRT‐I complexes reveals that PSDP motifs of the Vps27 ESCRT‐0 subunit bind to a novel electropositive N‐terminal site on the UEV domain of the ESCRT‐I subunit Vps23 centred on Trp16. This novel site is completely different from the C‐terminal part of the human UEV domain that binds to P(S/T)AP motifs of human ESCRT‐0 and HIV‐1 Gag. Disruption of the novel PSDP‐binding site eliminates the interaction in vitro and blocks enrichment of Vps23 in endosome‐related class E compartments in yeast cells. However, this site is non‐essential for sorting of the ESCRT cargo Cps1. Taken together, these results show how a conserved motif/domain pair can evolve to use strikingly different binding modes in different organisms.     

Crystal structure of the UBR‐box from UBR6/FBXO11 reveals domain swapping mediated by zinc binding

The UBR‐box is a 70‐residue zinc finger domain present in the UBR family of E3 ubiquitin ligases that directly binds N‐terminal degradation signals in substrate proteins. UBR6, also called FBXO11, is an UBR‐box containing E3 ubiquitin ligase that does not bind N‐terminal signals. Here, we present the crystal structure of the UBR‐box domain from human UBR6. The dimeric crystal structure reveals a unique form of domain swapping mediated by zinc coordination, where three independent protein chains come together to regenerate the topology of the monomeric UBR‐box fold. Analysis of the structure suggests that the absence of N‐terminal residue binding arises from the lack of an amino acid binding pocket.     

Asymmetric structure and domain binding interfaces of human tyrosyl‐tRNA synthetase studied by molecular dynamics simulations

Human tyrosyl‐tRNA synthetase (HsTyrRS) is composed of two structural modules: N‐terminal catalytic core and an EMAP II‐like C‐terminal domain. The structures of these modules are known, but no crystal structure of the full‐length HsTyrRS is currently available. An all‐atom model of the full‐length HsTyrRS was developed in this work. The structure, dynamics, and domain binding interfaces of HsTyrRS were investigated by extensive molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Our data suggest that HsTyrRS in solution consists of a number of compact asymmetric conformations, which differ significantly by their rigidity, internal mobility, orientation of C‐terminal modules, and the strength of interdomain binding. Interfaces of domain binding obtained in MD simulations are in perfect agreement with our previous coarse‐grained hierarchical rotations technique simulations. Formation of the hydrogen bonds between R93 residue of the ELR cytokine motif and the residues A340 and E479 in the C‐module was observed. This observation supports the idea that the lack of cytokine activity in the full‐length HsTyrRS is explained by interactions between N‐modules and C‐modules, which block the ELR motif. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Crystal structure of the C‐terminal domain of the Salmonella type III secretion system export apparatus protein InvA

InvA is a prominent inner‐membrane component of the Salmonella type III secretion system (T3SS) apparatus, which is responsible for regulating virulence protein export in pathogenic bacteria. InvA is made up of an N‐terminal integral membrane domain and a C‐terminal cytoplasmic domain that is proposed to form part of a docking platform for the soluble export apparatus proteins notably the T3SS ATPase InvC. Here, we report the novel crystal structure of the C‐terminal domain of Salmonella InvA which shows a compact structure composed of four subdomains. The overall structure is unique although the first and second subdomains exhibit structural similarity to the peripheral stalk of the A/V‐type ATPase and a ring building motif found in other T3SS proteins respectively.     

Crystal structure of human multiple copies in T‐cell lymphoma‐1 oncoprotein

Overexpression of multiple copies in T‐cell lymphoma‐1 (MCT‐1) oncogene accompanies malignant phenotypic changes in human lymphoma cells. Specific disruption of MCT‐1 results in reduced tumorigenesis, suggesting a potential for MCT‐1‐targeted therapeutic strategy. MCT‐1 is known as a cap‐binding protein and has a putative RNA‐binding motif, the PUA‐domain, at its C‐terminus. We determined the crystal structure of apo MCT‐1 at 1.7 Å resolution using the surface entropy reduction method. Notwithstanding limited sequence identity to its homologs, the C‐terminus of MCT‐1 adopted a typical PUA‐domain fold that includes secondary structural elements essential for RNA recognition. The surface of the N‐terminal domain contained positively charged patches that are predicted to contribute to RNA‐binding. Proteins 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Structural basis for Pan3 binding to Pan2 and its function in mRNA recruitment and deadenylation

The conserved eukaryotic Pan2–Pan3 deadenylation complex shortens cytoplasmic mRNA 3′ polyA tails to regulate mRNA stability. Although the exonuclease activity resides in Pan2, efficient deadenylation requires Pan3. The mechanistic role of Pan3 is unclear. Here, we show that Pan3 binds RNA directly both through its pseudokinase/C‐terminal domain and via an N‐terminal zinc finger that binds polyA RNA specifically. In contrast, isolated Pan2 is unable to bind RNA. Pan3 binds to the region of Pan2 that links its N‐terminal WD40 domain to the C‐terminal part that contains the exonuclease, with a 2:1 stoichiometry. The crystal structure of the Pan2 linker region bound to a Pan3 homodimer shows how the unusual structural asymmetry of the Pan3 dimer is used to form an extensive high‐affinity interaction. This binding allows Pan3 to supply Pan2 with substrate polyA RNA, facilitating efficient mRNA deadenylation by the intact Pan2–Pan3 complex.     

Structure of the pilus assembly protein TadZ from Eubacterium rectale: implications for polar localization

The tad (tight adherence) locus encodes a protein translocation system that produces a novel variant of type IV pili. The pilus assembly protein TadZ (called CpaE in Caulobacter crescentus) is ubiquitous in tad loci, but is absent in other type IV pilus biogenesis systems. The crystal structure of TadZ from Eubacterium rectale (ErTadZ), in complex with ATP and Mg²⁺, was determined to 2.1 Å resolution. ErTadZ contains an atypical ATPase domain with a variant of a deviant Walker‐A motif that retains ATP binding capacity while displaying only low intrinsic ATPase activity. The bound ATP plays an important role in dimerization of ErTadZ. The N‐terminal atypical receiver domain resembles the canonical receiver domain of response regulators, but has a degenerate, stripped‐down ‘active site’. Homology modelling of the N‐terminal atypical receiver domain of CpaE indicates that it has a conserved protein–protein binding surface similar to that of the polar localization module of the social mobility protein FrzS, suggesting a similar function. Our structural results also suggest that TadZ localizes to the pole through the atypical receiver domain during an early stage of pili biogenesis, and functions as a hub for recruiting other pili components, thus providing insights into the Tad pilus assembly process.     

Regulation of clathrin adaptor function in endocytosis: novel role for the SAM domain

During clathrin‐mediated endocytosis, adaptor proteins play central roles in coordinating the assembly of clathrin coats and cargo selection. Here we characterize the binding of the yeast endocytic adaptor Sla1p to clathrin through a variant clathrin‐binding motif that is negatively regulated by the Sla1p SHD2 domain. The crystal structure of SHD2 identifies the domain as a sterile α‐motif (SAM) domain and shows a propensity to oligomerize. By co‐immunoprecipitation, Sla1p binds to clathrin and self‐associates in vivo. Mutations in the clathrin‐binding motif that abolish clathrin binding and structure‐based mutations in SHD2 that impede self‐association result in endocytosis defects and altered dynamics of Sla1p assembly at the sites of endocytosis. These results define a novel mechanism for negative regulation of clathrin binding by an adaptor and suggest a role for SAM domains in clathrin‐mediated endocytosis.     

Structural and functional features of the NAD(P) dependent Gfo/Idh/MocA protein family oxidoreductases

The Gfo/Idh/MocA protein family contains a number of different proteins, which almost exclusively consist of NAD(P)‐dependent oxidoreductases that have a diverse set of substrates, typically pyranoses. In this study, to clarify common structural features that would contribute to their function, the available crystal structures of the members of this family have been analyzed. Despite a very low sequence identity, the central features of the three‐dimensional structures of the proteins are surprisingly similar. The members of the protein family have a two‐domain structure consisting of a N‐terminal nucleotide‐binding domain and a C‐terminal α/β‐domain. The C‐terminal domain contributes to the substrate binding and catalysis, and contains a βα‐motif with a central α‐helix carrying common essential amino acid residues. The β‐sheet of the α/β‐domain contributes to the oligomerization in most of the proteins in the family.