Expression of Clock Genes in Human Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells throughout the Sleep/Wake and Circadian Cycles

The rhythmic expression of circadian clock genes in the neurons of the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) underlies the manifestation of endogenous circadian rhythmicity in behavior and physiology. Recent evidence demonstrating rhythmic clock gene expression in non‐SCN tissues suggests that functional clocks exist outside the central circadian pacemaker of the brain. In this investigation, the nature of an oscillator in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) is evaluated by assessing clock gene expression throughout both a typical sleep/wake cycle (LD) and during a constant routine (CR). Six healthy men and women aged (mean±SEM) 23.7±1.6 yrs participated in this five‐day investigation in temporal isolation. Core body temperature and plasma melatonin concentration were measured as markers of the central circadian pacemaker. The expression of HPER1, HPER2, and HBMAL1 was quantified in PBMCs sampled throughout an uninterrupted 72 h period. The core body temperature minimum and the midpoint of melatonin concentration measured during the CR occurred 2:17±0:20 and 3:24 ±0:09 h before habitual awakening, respectively, and were well aligned to the sleep/wake cycle. HPER1 and HPER2 expression in PBMCs demonstrated significant circadian rhythmicity that peaked early after wake‐time and was comparable under LD and CR conditions. HBMAL1 expression was more variable, and peaked in the middle of the wake period under LD conditions and during the habitual sleep period under CR conditions. For the first time, bi‐hourly sampling over three consecutive days is used to compare clock gene expression in a human peripheral oscillator under different sleep/wake conditions.     

Expression of clock genes in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells throughout the sleep/wake and circadian cycles

The rhythmic expression of circadian clock genes in the neurons of the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) underlies the manifestation of endogenous circadian rhythmicity in behavior and physiology. Recent evidence demonstrating rhythmic clock gene expression in non-SCN tissues suggests that functional clocks exist outside the central circadian pacemaker of the brain. In this investigation, the nature of an oscillator in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) is evaluated by assessing clock gene expression throughout both a typical sleep/wake cycle (LD) and during a constant routine (CR). Six healthy men and women aged (mean±SEM) 23.7±1.6 yrs participated in this five-day investigation in temporal isolation. Core body temperature and plasma melatonin concentration were measured as markers of the central circadian pacemaker. The expression of HPER1, HPER2, and HBMAL1 was quantified in PBMCs sampled throughout an uninterrupted 72 h period. The core body temperature minimum and the midpoint of melatonin concentration measured during the CR occurred 2:17±0:20 and 3:24 ±0:09 h before habitual awakening, respectively, and were well aligned to the sleep/wake cycle. HPER1 and HPER2 expression in PBMCs demonstrated significant circadian rhythmicity that peaked early after wake-time and was comparable under LD and CR conditions. HBMAL1 expression was more variable, and peaked in the middle of the wake period under LD conditions and during the habitual sleep period under CR conditions. For the first time, bi-hourly sampling over three consecutive days is used to compare clock gene expression in a human peripheral oscillator under different sleep/wake conditions.     

The circadian cycle: daily rhythms from behaviour to genes

The daily recurrence of activity and rest are so common as to seem trivial. However, they reflect a ubiquitous temporal programme called the circadian clock. In the absence of either anatomical clock structures or clock genes, the timing of sleep and wakefulness is disrupted. The complex nature of circadian behaviour is evident in the fact that phasing of the cycle during the day varies widely for individuals, resulting in extremes colloquially called 'larks' and 'owls'. These behavioural oscillations are mirrored in the levels of physiology and gene expression. Deciphering the underlying mechanisms will provide important insights into how the circadian clock affects health and disease.     

生物钟在卵巢生理和病理中的作用

哺乳动物的昼夜节律是基因编码的分子钟在体内产生的一种以大约24 h为周期的生理现象,使机体的生理过程与外界环境的变化相协调,是对环境适应的一种表现.在哺乳动物中,繁殖生理功能受生物钟系统的调节.在下丘脑-垂体-卵巢(hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian,HPO)轴的各组织中均已观察到生物钟基因的...     

Induction of Circadian Rhythm in Cultured Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells by Serum Shock and cAMP Analogs in Vitro

Circadian clocks have been shown to operate developmentally in mouse and human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells in vivo, but little is known about their possible oscillations in vitro. Here, we show that repeated circadian oscillations could be induced in both cultured bone marrow‐derived mesenchymal‐ and adipose‐derived stem cells (MSCs and ASCs, respectively) by serum shock. In particular, the novel finding of rhythmic clock gene expression induced by cAMP analogs showed similarities as well as differences to serum‐induced oscillations. Rhythmic PER1 expression was found in serum‐shocked MSCs, suggesting the phosphorylation status of PER1 is important for its activity in circadian rhythms. Furthermore, immunofluoresent staining showed that the localization of PER1 was dependent on the level of PER1 expression. These inducible self‐sustained circadian clocks in primary cultures of human MSCs in vitro with rhythmic changes in expression levels, phosphorylation, and localization of clock protein, PER1, may be of importance for maintaining the induced oscillations in stem cells. Therefore, the established cell models described here appear to be valuable for studying the molecular mechanism driving and coordinating the circadian network between stem and stromal cells.     

Analysis of the molecular pathophysiology of sleep disorders relevant to a disturbed biological clock

Genetic studies have revealed several clock gene variations/mutations involved in the manifestation of sleep disorders or interindividual differences in sleep–wake patterns, but only part of the genetic risk can be explained by the gene variations/mutations identified to date. Recent progress in research into circadian rhythm generation has provided efficient tools for eliciting the molecular basis of clock-relevant sleep disorders, complementing traditional genetic analysis. While the human master clock resides in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the hypothalamus (central clock), peripheral tissue cells also generate self-sustained circadian oscillations of clock gene expression (peripheral clock), enabling estimation of individual human clock properties through a single collection of skin fibroblasts or venous blood cells. Some of the established cell lines exhibit autonomous circadian oscillations of clock gene expression, and introduction of clock gene variations into these cell lines by gene targeting makes it possible to investigate changes in the circadian phenotype induced by these variations/mutations without the need for generating transgenic animals. Estimation of human clock properties using peripheral tissue cells, in addition to genetic analysis, will facilitate comprehensive explication of the genetic risk of a variety of disorders relevant to biological clock disturbances, including sleep disorders, mood disorders, and metabolic diseases.     

Exploring the role of circadian clock gene and association with cancer pathophysiology

ABSTRACT

Most of the processes that occur in the mind and body follow natural rhythms. Those with a cycle length of about one day are called circadian rhythms. These rhythms are driven by a system of self-sustained clocks and are entrained by environmental cues such as light-dark cycles as well as food intake. In mammals, the circadian clock system is hierarchically organized such that the master clock in the suprachiasmatic nuclei of the hypothalamus integrates environmental information and synchronizes the phase of oscillators in peripheral tissues.

The circadian system is responsible for regulating a variety of physiological and behavioral processes, including feeding behavior and energy metabolism. Studies revealed that the circadian clock system consists primarily of a set of clock genes. Several genes control the biological clock, including BMAL1, CLOCK (positive regulators), CRY1, CRY2, PER1, PER2, and PER3 (negative regulators) as indicators of the peripheral clock.

Circadian has increasingly become an important area of medical research, with hundreds of studies pointing to the body’s internal clocks as a factor in both health and disease. Thousands of biochemical processes from sleep and wakefulness to DNA repair are scheduled and dictated by these internal clocks. Cancer is an example of health problems where chronotherapy can be used to improve outcomes and deliver a higher quality of care to patients.

In this article, we will discuss knowledge about molecular mechanisms of the circadian clock and the role of clocks in physiology and pathophysiology of concerns.     

Entrainment of circadian clocks in mammals by arousal and food

Circadian rhythms in mammals are regulated by a system of endogenous circadian oscillators (clock cells) in the brain and in most peripheral organs and tissues. One group of clock cells in the hypothalamic SCN (suprachiasmatic nuclei) functions as a pacemaker for co-ordinating the timing of oscillators elsewhere in the brain and body. This master clock can be reset and entrained by daily LD (light-dark) cycles and thereby also serves to interface internal with external time, ensuring an appropriate alignment of behavioural and physiological rhythms with the solar day. Two features of the mammalian circadian system provide flexibility in circadian programming to exploit temporal regularities of social stimuli or food availability. One feature is the sensitivity of the SCN pacemaker to behavioural arousal stimulated during the usual sleep period, which can reset its phase and modulate its response to LD stimuli. Neural pathways from the brainstem and thalamus mediate these effects by releasing neurochemicals that inhibit retinal inputs to the SCN clock or that alter clock-gene expression in SCN clock cells. A second feature is the sensitivity of circadian oscillators outside of the SCN to stimuli associated with food intake, which enables animals to uncouple rhythms of behaviour and physiology from LD cycles and align these with predictable daily mealtimes. The location of oscillators necessary for food-entrained behavioural rhythms is not yet certain. Persistence of these rhythms in mice with clock-gene mutations that disable the SCN pacemaker suggests diversity in the molecular basis of light- and food-entrainable clocks.     

Deleting the Arntl clock gene in the granular layer of the mouse cerebellum: impact on the molecular circadian clockwork

The suprachiasmatic nucleus houses the central circadian clock and is characterized by the timely regulated expression of clock genes. However, neurons of the cerebellar cortex also contain a circadian oscillator with circadian expression of clock genes being controlled by the suprachiasmatic nucleus. It has been suggested that the cerebellar circadian oscillator is involved in food anticipation, but direct molecular evidence of the role of the circadian oscillator of the cerebellar cortex is currently unavailable. To investigate the hypothesis that the circadian oscillator of the cerebellum is involved in circadian physiology and food anticipation, we therefore by use of Cre‐LoxP technology generated a conditional knockout mouse with the core clock gene Arntl deleted specifically in granule cells of the cerebellum, since expression of clock genes in the cerebellar cortex is mainly located in this cell type. We here report that deletion of Arntl heavily influences the molecular clock of the cerebellar cortex with significantly altered and arrhythmic expression of other central clock and clock‐controlled genes. On the other hand, daily expression of clock genes in the suprachiasmatic nucleus was unaffected. Telemetric registrations in different light regimes did not detect significant differences in circadian rhythms of running activity and body temperature between Arntl conditional knockout mice and controls. Furthermore, food anticipatory behavior did not differ between genotypes. These data suggest that Arntl is an essential part of the cerebellar oscillator; however, the oscillator of the granular layer of the cerebellar cortex does not control traditional circadian parameters or food anticipation.     

Hypocretins: The Timing of Sleep and Waking

The appropriate time and place for sleep and waking are important factors for survival. Sleep and waking, rest and activity, flight and fight, feeding, and reproduction are all organized in relation to the day and night. A biological clock, the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), synchronized by photic influences and other environmental cues, provides an endogenous timing signal that entrains circadian body rhythms and is complemented by a homeostatic sleep pressure factor. Cholinergic, catecholaminergic, serotonergic, and histaminergic nuclei control wakefulness and mutually interact with the SCN as well as sleep‐ and wake‐promoting neurons in the hypothalamus to form a bistable switch that controlls the timing of behavioral state transitions. Hypocretin neurons integrate circadian‐photic and nutritional‐metabolic influences and act as a conductor in the aminergic orchestra. Their loss causes narcolepsy, a disease conferring the inability to separate sleep and waking. Their role in appetitive behavior, stress, and memory functions is important to our understanding of addiction and compulsion.     

Output pathways of the mammalian suprachiasmatic nucleus: coding circadian time by transmitter selection and specific targeting

Every day, we experience profound changes in our mental and physical condition as body and brain alternate between states of high activity during the waking day and rest during night-time sleep. The fundamental evolutionary adaptation to these profound daily changes in our physiological state is an endogenous 24-h clock. This biological clock enables us to prepare ourselves to these daily changes, instead of only being able to show a passive and delayed response. During the past decade, enormous progress has been made in determining possible molecular components of the biological clock. An important question remains, however, regarding how the rhythmic signal from the biological clock is spread throughout the body to control its physiology and behavior. Indeed, ultimately, the only raison d'etre for the biological clock is its output (Green 1998). In the present review, we propose that the main mechanism for the spreading time-of-day information throughout the body consists of different circadian waves of suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) transmitter release, directed to a restricted number of specific SCN target areas, and affecting both neuroendocrine mechanisms and the peripheral autonomic nervous system.     

Circadiane Uhren und Energiemetabolismus

Chrononutrition – circadian clocks and energy metabolism Genetically encoded endogenous clocks regulate 24‐hour rhythms of physiology and behavior. A central pacemaker residing in the suprachiasmatic nucleus synchronizes peripheral clocks found in all tissues with each other and with the external day‐night cycle. One function of circadian clocks is the regulation of energy metabolism via rhythmic activation of tissue‐specific clock‐controlled genes. In the liver, genes involved in glucose and lipid metabolism are regulated in this fashion, while in adipocytes, fatty acid release and adipokine secretion are controlled by the circadian clock. Disruption of circadian rhythms as seen, for example, in shift workers promotes the development of metabolic disorders such as obesity and type‐2 diabetes.     

Heterogeneous Expression of the Core Circadian Clock Proteins among Neuronal Cell Types in Mouse Retina

Circadian rhythms in metabolism, physiology, and behavior originate from cell-autonomous circadian clocks located in many organs and structures throughout the body and that share a common molecular mechanism based on the clock genes and their protein products. In the mammalian neural retina, despite evidence supporting the presence of several circadian clocks regulating many facets of retinal physiology and function, the exact cellular location and genetic signature of the retinal clock cells remain largely unknown. Here we examined the expression of the core circadian clock proteins CLOCK, BMAL1, NPAS2, PERIOD 1(PER1), PERIOD 2 (PER2), and CRYPTOCHROME2 (CRY2) in identified neurons of the mouse retina during daily and circadian cycles. We found concurrent clock protein expression in most retinal neurons, including cone photoreceptors, dopaminergic amacrine cells, and melanopsin-expressing intrinsically photosensitive ganglion cells. Remarkably, diurnal and circadian rhythms of expression of all clock proteins were observed in the cones whereas only CRY2 expression was found to be rhythmic in the dopaminergic amacrine cells. Only a low level of expression of the clock proteins was detected in the rods at any time of the daily or circadian cycle. Our observations provide evidence that cones and not rods are cell-autonomous circadian clocks and reveal an important disparity in the expression of the core clock components among neuronal cell types. We propose that the overall temporal architecture of the mammalian retina does not result from the synchronous activity of pervasive identical clocks but rather reflects the cellular and regional heterogeneity in clock function within retinal tissue.