Effect of histamine and histamine antagonists on the glycogen content of Tetrahymena

The glycogen content of Tetrahymena pyriformis was analysed by a cytophotometric method. Histamine and histamine antagonists were found to influence the glycogen content. It increases after acute histamine treatment, while it decreases after 4 days incubation with histamine. The H2 receptor antagonist methiamide was more effective than histamine, while the H1 receptor antagonist phenindamine had no effect on the glycogen content. The effect reflects the similarity or dissimilarity of the chemical structure of the antagonists and of histamine. Subdivision of the cytophotometric results indicated that all of the protozoa react to histamine or to its antagonists, but all agents increased the number of glycogen-rich Tetrahymena.     

Synthesis of novel histamine H4 receptor antagonists

This letter describes the discovery and synthesis of a series of octahydropyrrolo[3,4-c]pyrrole based selective histamine hH4 receptor antagonists. The amidine compound 20 was found to be a potent and selective histamine H4 receptor antagonist with moderate clearance and a high volume of distribution.     

Molecular basis for the interaction of histamine with the histamine H2 receptor.

We undertook these studies to characterize the molecular basis of the interaction of histamine with the H2 receptor. Key areas of homology in the structures of the histamine H2 and beta 2 adrenergic receptor suggested specific transmembrane amino acids that might be important for binding of histamine. A third transmembrane aspartic acid of the histamine receptor (Asp98), thought to serve as a counter anion that interacts with the cationic amine moiety of histamine, was mutated to Asn98, and the mutated receptor was expressed in Hepa cells. Removal of the negatively charged amino acid abolished both binding of the H2 receptor antagonist [methyl-3H]tiotidine and histamine stimulated increases in cellular cAMP content. Mutation of a fifth transmembrane aspartic acid (Asp186) to Ala186 or Asn186 by itself or in conjunction with mutation of another fifth transmembrane amino acid (Thr190 to Ala190) resulted in a loss of [methyl-3H] tiotidine binding, although the generation of cAMP in response to histamine was maintained. The histamine receptor with only a Thr190 to Ala190 or Cys190 mutation retained the ability to bind [methyl-3H]tiotidine, but both the affinity and efficacy of binding were reduced. These data lead us to propose a model for histamine binding in which Asp98 is essential for histamine binding and action, Asp186 defines H2 selectivity, and Thr190 is important in establishing the kinetics of histamine binding, but is not essential for H2 selectivity.     

Binding of histamine and histamine analogs to lymphocyte subsets analyzed by flow cytometry

The binding of histamine, 4-methylhistamine (a histamine type 2 receptor agonist), cimetidine (a histamine type 2 receptor antagonist), and telemethylhistamine (an inactive analog) to human peripheral blood mononuclear cell subsets was investigated by flow cytometry by using conjugates of these ligands coupled to fluorescein-labeled human serum albumin. Our results indicate that binding of fluorescent protein conjugates of histamine and its analogs does not selectively identify a lymphocyte subset(s) that mediates the immunomodulatory effects of histaminergic ligands. Conjugates with both low (2.5 to 2.8:1) and high (28 to 57:1) ligand to protein coupling ratios were used. No binding above background could be detected for the low mole ratio reagents. The high mole ratio reagents were bound by 95 to 99% of all lymphocytes when used at ligand concentrations of 50 microM or greater. At lower ligand concentrations, the number of lymphocytes exceeding a set fluorescence threshold was decreased, but fluorescence distributions remained unimodal at all concentrations used (1 to 500 microM). Monocytes also bound the high mole ratio reagents and gave rise to a second high-intensity peak in the fluorescence distribution unless they were excluded by other means. Levels of conjugate binding detected by flow cytometry did not parallel ligand potencies at classical histamine type 2 receptors; at equivalent ligand concentrations, approximately equal amounts of histamine or 4-methylhistamine conjugate were bound per lymphocyte, and only 30% less telemethylhistamine conjugate was bound. Competition with free ligands (10(2)- to 10(4)-fold excess histamine, 4-methylhistamine, cimetidine, or telemethylhistamine) did not significantly decrease the level of binding observed for the high mole ratio reagents at bound ligand concentrations of 1 to 25 microM. Dual staining with fluorescein-labeled conjugate and phycoerythrin-labeled monoclonal antibodies Leu-3ab (anti-helper T), Leu-2a (anti-suppressor T), Leu-M3 (anti-monocyte), or anti-HLA-DR (B cells and monocytes) was also carried out. The extent of conjugate binding to helper and suppressor cells was identical for each of the ligands used, but higher levels of conjugate binding were seen for monocytes and B cells than for T cells in every case. Our data do not exclude the possibility of enhanced conjugate binding to small numbers of activated (HLA-DR positive) T cells that might be involved in mediation of histamine effects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Reduced histamine levels and H3 receptor antagonist-induced histamine release in the amygdala of Apoe-/- mice

The histamine H(3) receptor is a constitutively active G protein-coupled receptor for the neurotransmitter histamine that serves a negative feedback function. A role for the histamine H(3) receptor has been suggested in neurodegenerative diseases, such as Parkinsons disease and Alzheimer's disease. Mice deficient in apolipoprotein E (apoE), a protein involved in development, regeneration, neurite outgrowth, and neuroprotection, show increased measures of anxiety and reduced sensitivity to effects of histamine H(3) receptor antagonists on measures of anxiety. In this study, we tested whether in mice lacking apoE (Apoe-/-) histamine levels and histamine release in brain areas involved in the regulation of anxiety are altered. H(3) receptor antagonist-induced histamine release was lower in the amygdala of Apoe-/- than wild-type mice. In contrast, there were no genotype differences in histamine release in the hypothalamus. Consistent with these data, histamine immunohistochemistry revealed lower total and synaptic histamine levels in the central nucleus of the amygdala of Apoe-/- than wild-type mice. Such changes were not seen in the hypothalamus, hippocampus, or cortex. In Apoe-/- mice, chronically decreased histamine levels and reduced histamine release in the amygdala might contribute to increased measures of anxiety.     

Brain histamine and histamine H3 receptors following repeated L-histidine administration in rats

In order to assess the importance of the chronic increase in precursor availability on central histaminergic mechanisms in rats, nine male Wistar rats received L-histidine orally at a dose of 1000 mg/kg, twice daily (07.00 h and 19.00 h) for 1 week; 9 rats were used as controls. Brain tissue histamine and tele-methylhistamine levels, as well as plasma histamine concentration were assayed. Binding properties and regional distribution of the autoregulatory histamine H3 receptors in brain were studied with [3H]-R-alpha-methylhistamine receptor binding and autoradiography. In L-histidine loaded rats, tissue histamine levels in cortex, hypothalamus, and rest of the brain were significantly increased by 40%-70%. Histamine concentrations in cerebellum and plasma, and tele-methylhistamine concentrations in cortex and hypothalamus did not change. The binding properties of H3 receptors in cortex were not altered. However, there were changes in the regional distribution of [3H]-R-alpha-methylhistamine binding sites, suggestive of a region-selective up-/down-regulation of histamine H3 receptors or their receptor sub-types. These results imply that following repeated L-histidine administration in the rat (1) there is enhanced synthesis of brain histamine not reflected in its functional release; (2) the excess of histamine is sequestered and stored rather than being metabolized; (3) histamine H(3) receptor binding properties are not altered, whereas receptor density is changed in selected regions. In conclusion, these results demonstrate that the neuronal mechanisms controlling histamine synthesis, storage, and release are adaptable and allow the sequestration of the excess of histamine in order to prevent excessively high neuronal activity.     

Tricyclic aminopyrimidine histamine H4 receptor antagonists

This report discloses the development of a series of tricyclic histamine H(4) receptor antagonists. Starting with a low nanomolar benzofuranopyrimidine HTS hit devoid of pharmaceutically acceptable properties, we navigated issues with metabolism and solubility to furnish a potent, stable and water soluble tricyclic histamine H(4) receptor antagonist with desirable physiochemical parameters which demonstrated efficacy a mouse ova model.     

Identification of a histamine H4 receptor on human eosinophils--role in eosinophil chemotaxis

Eosinophils are recruited to sites of inflammation via the action of a number of chemical mediators, including PAF, leukotrienes, eotaxins, ECF-A and histamine. Although many of the cell-surface receptors for these mediators have been identified, histamine-driven chemotaxis has not been conclusively attributed to any of the three known histamine receptor subtypes, suggesting the possibility of a 4th histamine-responsive receptor on eosinophils. We have identified and cloned a novel G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), termed Pfi-013, from an IL-5 stimulated eosinophil cDNA library which is homologous to the human histamine H3 receptor, both at the sequence and gene structure level. Expression data indicates that Pfi-013 is predominantly expressed in peripheral blood leukocytes, with lower expression levels in spleen, testis and colon. Ligand-binding studies using Pfi-013 expressed in HEK-293Galpha15 cells, demonstrates specific binding to histamine with a Kd of 3.28 +/- 0.76 nM and possesses a unique rank order of potency against known histaminergic compounds in a competitive ligand-binding assay (histamine > clobenpropit > iodophenpropit > thioperamide > R-alpha-methylhistamine > cimetidine > pyrilamine). We have therefore termed this receptor human histamine H4. Chemotaxis studies on isolated human eosinophils have confirmed that histamine is chemotactic and that agonists of the known histamine receptors (H1, H2, and H3) do not induce such a response. Furthermore, studies employing histamine-receptor antagonists have shown an inhibition of chemotaxis only by the H3 antagonists clobenpropit and thioperamide. Since these compounds are also antagonists of hH4 we postulate that the receptor mediating histaminergic chemotaxis is this novel histamine H4 receptor.     

Autoregulation of enterochromaffin-like cell histamine secretion via the histamine 3 receptor subtype.

INTRODUCTION: The neuroendocrine histamine-secreting cell of the gastric fundus, the enferochromaffin-like cell, is the principal regulator of parietal cell acid secretion. We have proposed that histamine may regulate its own synthesis and release via an autocrine mechanism. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of the histamine receptor subtypes H1, H2 and H3 in the regulation of this phenomenon. METHODS: Purified ECL cells were isolated by pronase digestion and EDTA exposure of the rat stomach, followed by particle size and density separation using counterflow elutriation and Nycodenz gradient centrifugation, 24-hr cultured cells were pretreated for 30 min with the agents; H1 receptor agonist (2-[(3-trimethyl)-diphenyl] histamine) (TMPH), H1 receptor antagonist (terfenadine); H2 receptor agonist (dimaprit) or antagonist (cimetidine or loxitidine); or H3 receptor agonist (imetit) or antagonist (thioperamide) (all tested, 10(-10)-10(-6) M). Gastrin was then used to stimulate histamine secretion. Histamine secretion was quantified by specific enzyme-immunoassay. RESULTS: Basal histamine secretion was 2.7 +/- 0.14 nmol/10(3) cells. Gastrin-stimulated (10 nM) levels were 4.6 +/- 0.4 nmol/10(3) cells (p < .01). TMPH inhibited both basal and gastrin driven histamine secretion with a maximal effect (34 percent) (1.78 +/- 0.08 nmol/10(3) cells) and an IC50 of > 5 x 10(-7) M. H1 receptor antagonism did not alter histamine secretion alone or in combination with gastrin. Neither H2 receptor stimulation nor antagonism had any effect on histamine secretion alone or in combination with gastrin. Gastrin-induced histamine secretion was dose-dependently inhibited by imetit (H3 agonist) with a maximal effect (2.4 +/- 0.6 nmol/10(3) cells) (p < .05) and an IC50 of 10(-9) M. Conversely, Thioperamide (H3 antagonist) dose-dependently augmented gastrin-stimulated histamine secretion with a maximum effect (5.7 +/- 0.5 nmol/10(3) cells) (p < .05) at 10(-8) M and an EC50 of 7 x 10(-10) M. CONCLUSION: These data are consistent with the presence of an H3 receptor on the ECL cell which modulates gastrin-stimulated histamine secretion. Our observations support the proposal that a histamine-mediated short-loop autocrine regulatory mechanism of ECL cell secretion exists.     

Molecular cloning and characterization of a new human histamine receptor, HH4R

A new histamine receptor, HH4R, was cloned from human leukocyte cDNA. The deduced amino acid sequence showed about 40% identity to that of the human histamine H3 receptor, HH3R. HH4R-expressing cells responded to histamine, inhibiting forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation. An H3 agonist, N-alpha-methylhistamine (NAMHA), bound specifically to HH4R, while another H3 agonist, R(-)-alpha-methylhistamine (RAMHA), and the H3 antagonist, thioperamide, competed with this binding. RAMHA, NAMHA, and imetit inhibited forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation in HH4R-expressing cells. However, the binding affinities and agonistic activities of H3 agonists to HH4R were weaker than those to HH3R. Low expression of HH4R was detected in a wide variety of peripheral tissues by RT-PCR; however, in contrast with HH3R, expression was not detected in the brain. These observations indicate that the clone is a distinct histamine receptor from HH3R, and thus is named HH4R.     

Development of a homogeneous binding assay for histamine receptors

Histamine is critically involved in a wide range of physiological and pathological processes through its actions at different receptors. Thus, histamine receptors have been actively pursued as therapeutic targets in the pharmaceutical industry for the treatment of a variety of diseases. There are currently four histamine receptors that have been cloned, all of which are G protein-coupled receptors. Studies from both academia and pharmaceutical companies have identified compounds that modulate the function of specific histamine receptors. These efforts led to the successful introduction of histamine H(1) and H(2) receptor antagonists for the treatment of allergy and excess gastric acid secretion, respectively. Histamine H(3) receptor ligands are currently under investigation for the treatment of obesity and neurological disorders. The recently identified histamine H(4) receptor is preferentially expressed in the immune tissues, suggesting a potential role in normal immune functions and possibly in the pathogenesis of inflammatory diseases. Even with the long history of histamine research and the important applications of histamine receptor ligands, assays to measure the affinity of compounds binding to histamine receptors are still routinely analyzed using a filtration assay, a very low-throughput assay involving washing and filtration steps. This article describes a simple, robust, and homogeneous binding assay based on the scintillation proximity assay (SPA) technology that provides results equivalent to those obtained using the more complex filtration assay. The SPA format is easily adapted to high-throughput screening because it is amenable to automation. In summary, this technique allows high-throughput screening of compounds against multiple histamine receptors and, thus, facilitates drug discovery efforts.     

Molecular cloning of the human histamine H2 receptor.

We utilized the technique of polymerase chain reaction with oligonucleotide primers based upon the nucleotide sequence of the canine H2 histamine receptor gene which we recently isolated to clone its human homologue. Transfection of a construct of this gene in Colo-320 DM cells led to the expression of a receptor that bound to [methyl-3H] tiotidine and was linked to 3',5'cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) generation in response to histamine. Both cAMP generation and [methyl-3H] tiotidine binding were inhibited with the H2 histamine receptor selective antagonist cimetidine but not diphenhydramine or thioperamide which are, respectively, H1 and H3 histamine receptor antagonists. These data confirm that we have successfully cloned a novel gene encoding the human H2 histamine receptor.     

The effect of pKa on pyrimidine/pyridine-derived histamine H4 ligands

During the course of our efforts toward the discovery of human histamine H₄ antagonists from a series of 2-aminiopyrimidines, it was noted that a 6-trifluoromethyl group dramatically reduced affinity of the series toward the histamine H₄ receptor. This observation was further investigated by synthesizing a series of ligands that varied in pK_a of the pyrimidine derived H₄ ligands by over five orders of magnitude and the effect on histamine H₄ affinity. This trend was then extended to the discovery of C-linked piperidinyl-2-amino pyridines as histamine H₄ receptor antagonists.     

Identification of 2-arylbenzimidazoles as potent human histamine H4 receptor ligands

A series of 2-arylbenzimidazoles was synthesized and found to bind with high affinity to the human histamine H(4) receptor. Structure-activity relationships were investigated through library preparation and evaluation as well as traditional medicinal chemistry approaches, leading to the discovery of compounds with single-digit nanomolar affinity for the H(4) receptor.     

Ontogeny of the smooth muscle response to histamine in rabbit and human small bowel

Histamine is known to stimulate small bowel smooth muscle contraction in adults. We studied the response to histamine of small bowel from 27 day gestation fetal (term = 31 days), 4 days-old neonatal, and weanling rabbits using an isolated muscle strip technique in vitro. Sensitivity to histamine stimulation decreased with increasing age, with a six-fold difference in mean D50 between fetal and weanling bowel. A strong contractile response was also obtained in human fetal bowel between 16 and 24 weeks gestation. The response to histamine was inhibited at all ages in both rabbit and human bowel by specific histamine H1 receptor blockade with diphenhydramine, and not by H2 or cholinergic receptor blockers. We conclude that histamine stimulates rabbit and human fetal small bowel contraction; stimulation specifically occurs via the histamine H1 receptor, and is unrelated to release of acetylcholine; sensitivity to histamine decreases significantly with maturity in the rabbit.     

Selective regulation of H1 histamine receptor signaling by G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 in uterine smooth muscle cells

Histamine stimulates uterine contraction; however, little is known regarding the mechanism or regulation of uterine histamine receptor signaling. Here we investigated the regulation of Galpha(q/11)-coupled histamine receptor signaling in human myometrial smooth muscle cells using the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate biosensor pleckstrin homology domain of phospholipase-delta1 tagged to enhanced green fluorescent protein and the Ca(2+)-sensitive dye Fluo-4. Histamine addition caused concentration-dependent increases in inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate and [Ca(2+)](i) in the ULTR human uterine smooth muscle cell line and primary human myometrial cells. These effects were completely inhibited by the H(1) histamine receptor antagonist, diphenhydramine, and were unaffected by the H(2) histamine receptor antagonist, cimetidine. ULTR and primary myometrial cells were transfected with either dominant-negative G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) or small interfering RNAs targeting specific GRKs to assess the roles of this protein kinase family in H(1) histamine receptor desensitization. Dominant-negative GRK2, but not GRK5 or GRK6, prevented H(1) histamine receptor desensitization. Similarly, transfection with short interfering RNAs (that each caused >70% depletion of the targeted GRK) for GRK2, but not GRK3 or GRK6, also prevented H(1) histamine receptor desensitization. Our data suggest that histamine stimulates phospholipase C-signaling in myometrial smooth muscle cells through H(1) histamine receptors and that GRK2 recruitment is a key mechanism in the regulation of H(1) histamine receptor signaling in human uterine smooth muscle. These data provide insights into the in situ regulation of this receptor subtype and may inform pathophysiological functioning in preterm labor and other conditions involving uterine smooth muscle dysregulation.     

From histamine to imidazolylalkyl-sulfonamides: the design of a novel series of histamine H3-receptor antagonists.

Histamine was converted to a selective histamine H3-receptor antagonist by capping the primary amine with 2-naphthalenesulfonyl chloride. Higher receptor affinity and lower variability in the data from the various bioassays were achieved with the 2-naphthalensulfonamides of histamine homologues.     

Fluorescent non-imidazole histamine H3 receptor ligands with nanomolar affinities

Omega-piperidinoalkanamine derivatives with fluorescent moieties (2-cyanoisoindol-1-yl, 7-nitrobenzofurazan-4-yl) have been synthesized starting from piperidine in three steps. The compounds display moderate to good histamine hH(3) receptor affinities with K(i) values ranging from 178 to 11nM. The new compounds may act as tools for identification and understanding of the binding site on the histamine H(3) receptor.     

Gastric submucosal microdialysis: a method to study gastrin- and food-evoked mobilization of ECL-cell histamine in conscious rats

Rat stomach ECL cells are rich in histamine and chromogranin A-derived peptides, such as pancreastatin. Gastrin causes the parietal cells to secrete acid by flooding them with histamine from the ECL cells. In the past, gastric histamine release has been studied using anaesthetized, surgically manipulated animals or isolated gastric mucosa, glands or ECL cells. We monitored gastric histamine mobilization in intact conscious rats by subjecting them to gastric submucosal microdialysis. A microdialysis probe was implanted into the submucosa of the acid-producing part of the stomach (day 1). The rats had access to food and water or were deprived of food (48 h), starting on day 2 after implantation of the probe. On day 4, the rats received food or gastrin (intravenous infusion), and sampling of microdialysate commenced. Samples (flow rate 1.2 microl min(-1)) were collected every 20 or 60 min, and the histamine and pancreastatin concentrations were determined. The serum gastrin concentration was determined in tail vein blood. Exogenous gastrin (4-h infusion) raised microdialysate histamine and pancreastatin dose-dependently. This effect was prevented by gastrin receptor blockade (YM022). Depletion of ECL-cell histamine by alpha-fluoromethylhistidine, an irreversible inhibitor of the histamine-forming enzyme, suppressed the gastrin-evoked release of histamine but not that of pancreastatin. Fasting lowered serum gastrin and microdialysate histamine by 50%, while refeeding raised serum gastrin and microdialysate histamine and pancreastatin 3-fold. We conclude that histamine mobilized by gastrin and food intake derives from ECL cells because: 1) Histamine and pancreastatin were released concomitantly, 2) histamine mobilization following gastrin or food intake was prevented by gastrin receptor blockade, and 3) mobilization of histamine (but not pancreastatin) was abolished by alpha-fluoromethylhistidine. Hence, gastric submucosal microdialysis allows us to monitor the mobilization of ECL-cell histamine in intact conscious rats under various experimental conditions not previously accessible to study. While gastrin receptor blockade lowered post-prandial release of ECL-cell histamine by about 80%, unilateral vagotomy reduced post-prandial mobilization of ECL-cell histamine by about 50%. Hence, both gastrin and vagal excitation contribute to the post-prandial release of ECL-cell histamine.