Structural Basis for the Discriminative Recognition of N6-Methyladenosine RNA by the Human YT521-B Homology Domain Family of Proteins

N⁶-Methyladenosine (m⁶A) is the most abundant internal modification in RNA and is specifically recognized by YT521-B homology (YTH) domain-containing proteins. Recently we reported that YTHDC1 prefers guanosine and disfavors adenosine at the position preceding the m⁶A nucleotide in RNA and preferentially binds to the GG(m⁶A)C sequence. Now we systematically characterized the binding affinities of the YTH domains of three other human proteins and yeast YTH domain protein Pho92 and determined the crystal structures of the YTH domains of human YTHDF1 and yeast Pho92 in complex with a 5-mer m⁶A RNA, respectively. Our binding and structural data revealed that the YTH domain used a conserved aromatic cage to recognize m⁶A. Nevertheless, none of these YTH domains, except YTHDC1, display sequence selectivity at the position preceding the m⁶A modification. Structural comparison of these different YTH domains revealed that among those, only YTHDC1 harbors a distinctly selective binding pocket for the nucleotide preceding the m⁶A nucleotide.     

Formation and removal of 1,N6-dimethyladenosine in mammalian transfer RNA

RNA molecules harbor diverse modifications that play important regulatory roles in a variety of biological processes. Over 150 modifications have been identified in RNA molecules. N⁶-methyladenosine (m⁶A) and 1-methyladenosine (m¹A) are prevalent modifications occurring in various RNA species of mammals. Apart from the single methylation of adenosine (m⁶A and m¹A), dual methylation modification occurring in the nucleobase of adenosine, such as N⁶,N⁶-dimethyladenosine (m^6,6A), also has been reported to be present in RNA of mammals. Whether there are other forms of dual methylation modification occurring in the nucleobase of adenosine other than m^6,6A remains elusive. Here, we reported the existence of a novel adenosine dual methylation modification, i.e. 1,N⁶-dimethyladenosine (m^1,6A), in tRNAs of living organisms. We confirmed that m^1,6A is located at position 58 of tRNAs and is prevalent in mammalian cells and tissues. The measured level of m^1,6A ranged from 0.0049% to 0.047% in tRNAs. Furthermore, we demonstrated that TRMT6/61A could catalyze the formation of m^1,6A in tRNAs and m^1,6A could be demethylated by ALKBH3. Collectively, the discovery of m^1,6A expands the diversity of RNA modifications and may elicit a new tRNA modification-mediated gene regulation pathway.     

Structures of Human ALKBH5 Demethylase Reveal a Unique Binding Mode for Specific Single-stranded N6-Methyladenosine RNA Demethylation

N⁶-Methyladenosine (m⁶A) is the most prevalent internal RNA modification in eukaryotes. ALKBH5 belongs to the AlkB family of dioxygenases and has been shown to specifically demethylate m⁶A in single-stranded RNA. Here we report crystal structures of ALKBH5 in the presence of either its cofactors or the ALKBH5 inhibitor citrate. Catalytic assays demonstrate that the ALKBH5 catalytic domain can demethylate both single-stranded RNA and single-stranded DNA. We identify the TCA cycle intermediate citrate as a modest inhibitor of ALKHB5 (IC₅₀, ∼488 μm). The structural analysis reveals that a loop region of ALKBH5 is immobilized by a disulfide bond that apparently excludes the binding of dsDNA to ALKBH5. We identify the m⁶A binding pocket of ALKBH5 and the key residues involved in m⁶A recognition using mutagenesis and ITC binding experiments.     

Prognostic signature and immune efficacy of m1A-, m5C- and m6A-related regulators in cutaneous melanoma

Cutaneous melanoma (CM) is an aggressive cancer; given that initial and specific signs are lacking, diagnosis is often late and the prognosis is poor. RNA modification has been widely studied in tumour progression. Nevertheless, little progress has been made in the signature of N¹-methyladenosine (m¹A), 5-methylcytosine (m⁵C), N⁶-methyladenosine (m⁶A)-related regulators and the tumour microenvironment (TME) cell infiltration in CM. Our study identified the characteristics of m¹A-, m⁵C- and m⁶A-related regulators based on 468 CM samples from the public database. Using univariate, multivariate and LASSO Cox regression analysis, a risk model of regulators was established and validated by a nomogram on independent prognostic factors. The gene set variation analysis (GSVA) and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) clarified the involved functional pathways. A combined single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) and CIBERSORT approach revealed TME of regulator-related prognostic signature. The nine-gene signature stratified the patients into distinct risk subgroups for personalized prognostic assessment. Additionally, functional enrichment, immune infiltration and immunotherapy response analysis indicated that the high-risk group was correlated with T-cell suppression, while the low-risk group was more sensitive to immunotherapy. The findings presented here contribute to our understanding of the TME molecular heterogeneity in CM. Nine m¹A-, m⁵C- and m⁶A-related regulators may also be promising biomarkers for future research.     

Probing N6-methyladenosine RNA modification status at single nucleotide resolution in mRNA and long noncoding RNA

N⁶-methyladenosine (m⁶A) is the most abundant modification in mammalian mRNA and long noncoding RNA (lncRNA). Recent discoveries of two m⁶A demethylases and cell-type and cell-state-dependent m⁶A patterns indicate that m⁶A modifications are highly dynamic and likely play important biological roles for RNA akin to DNA methylation or histone modification. Proposed functions for m⁶A modification include mRNA splicing, export, stability, and immune tolerance; but m⁶A studies have been hindered by the lack of methods for its identification at single nucleotide resolution. Here, we develop a method that accurately determines m⁶A status at any site in mRNA/lncRNA, termed site-specific cleavage and radioactive-labeling followed by ligation-assisted extraction and thin-layer chromatography (SCARLET). The method determines the precise location of the m⁶A residue and its modification fraction, which are crucial parameters in probing the cellular dynamics of m⁶A modification. We applied the method to determine the m⁶A status at several sites in two human lncRNAs and three human mRNAs and found that m⁶A fraction varies between 6% and 80% among these sites. We also found that many m⁶A candidate sites in these RNAs are however not modified. The precise determination of m⁶A status in a long noncoding RNA also enables the identification of an m⁶A-containing RNA structural motif.     

YTH Domain: A Family of N6-methyladenosine (m6A) Readers

Like protein and DNA, different types of RNA molecules undergo various modifications. Accumulating evidence suggests that these RNA modifications serve as sophisticated codes to mediate RNA behaviors and many important biological functions. N⁶-methyladenosine (m⁶A) is the most abundant internal RNA modification found in a variety of eukaryotic RNAs, including but not limited to mRNAs, tRNAs, rRNAs, and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs). In mammalian cells, m⁶A can be incorporated by a methyltransferase complex and removed by demethylases, which ensures that the m⁶A modification is reversible and dynamic. Moreover, m⁶A is recognized by the YT521-B homology (YTH) domain-containing proteins, which subsequently direct different complexes to regulate RNA signaling pathways, such as RNA metabolism, RNA splicing, RNA folding, and protein translation. Herein, we summarize the recent progresses made in understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying the m⁶A recognition by YTH domain-containing proteins, which would shed new light on m⁶A-specific recognition and provide clues to the future identification of reader proteins of many other RNA modifications.     

METTL3-mediated mRNA N6-methyladenosine is required for oocyte and follicle development in mice

Proper follicle development is very important for the production of mature oocytes, which is essential for the maintenance of female fertility. This complex biological process requires precise gene regulation. The most abundant modification of mRNA, N⁶-methyladenosine (m⁶A), is involved in many RNA metabolism processes, including RNA splicing, translation, stability, and degradation. Here, we report that m⁶A plays essential roles during oocyte and follicle development. Oocyte-specific inactivation of the key m⁶A methyltransferase Mettl3 with Gdf9-Cre caused DNA damage accumulation in oocytes, defective follicle development, and abnormal ovulation. Mechanistically, combined RNA-seq and m⁶A methylated RNA immunoprecipitation sequencing (MeRIP-seq) data from oocytes revealed, that we found METTL3 targets Itsn2 for m⁶A modification and then enhances its stability to influence the oocytes meiosis. Taken together, our findings highlight the crucial roles of mRNA m⁶A modification in follicle development and coordination of RNA stabilization during oocyte growth.Subject terms: Oogenesis, Infertility     

Identification of a novel methyltransferase,Bmt2, responsible for the N-1-methyl-adenosine base modification of 25S rRNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The 25S rRNA of yeast contains several base modifications in the functionally important regions. The enzymes responsible for most of these base modifications remained unknown. Recently, we identified Rrp8 as a methyltransferase involved in m¹A645 modification of 25S rRNA. Here, we discovered a previously uncharacterized gene YBR141C to be responsible for second m¹A2142 modification of helix 65 of 25S rRNA. The gene was identified by reversed phase–HPLC screening of all deletion mutants of putative RNA methyltransferase and was confirmed by gene complementation and phenotypic characterization. Because of the function of its encoded protein, YBR141C was named BMT2 (base methyltransferase of 25S RNA). Helix 65 belongs to domain IV, which accounts for most of the intersubunit surface of the large subunit. The 3D structure prediction of Bmt2 supported it to be an Ado Met methyltransferase belonging to Rossmann fold superfamily. In addition, we demonstrated that the substitution of G180R in the S-adenosyl-l-methionine–binding motif drastically reduces the catalytic function of the protein in vivo. Furthermore, we analysed the significance of m¹A2142 modification in ribosome synthesis and translation. Intriguingly, the loss of m¹A2142 modification confers anisomycin and peroxide sensitivity to the cells. Our results underline the importance of RNA modifications in cellular physiology.     

Immuno-Northern Blotting: Detection of RNA Modifications by Using Antibodies against Modified Nucleosides

The biological roles of RNA modifications are still largely not understood. Thus, developing a method for detecting RNA modifications is important for further clarification. We developed a method for detecting RNA modifications called immuno-northern blotting (INB) analysis and herein introduce its various capabilities. This method involves the separation of RNAs using either polyacrylamide or agarose gel electrophoresis, followed by transfer onto a nylon membrane and subsequent immunoblotting using antibodies against modified nucleosides for the detection of specific modifications. We confirmed that INB with the antibodies for 1-methyladenosine (m¹A), N6-methyladenosine (m⁶A), pseudouridine, and 5-methylcytidine (m⁵C) showed different modifications in a variety of RNAs from various species and organelles. INB with the anti-m⁵C antibody revealed that the antibody cross-reacted with another modification on DNA, suggesting the application of this method for characterization of the antibody for modified nucleosides. Additionally, using INB with the antibody for m¹A, which is a highly specific modification in eukaryotic tRNA, we detected tRNA-derived fragments known as tiRNAs under the cellular stress response, suggesting the application for tracking target RNA containing specific modifications. INB with the anti-m⁶A antibody confirmed the demethylation of m⁶A by the specific demethylases fat mass and obesity-associated protein (FTO) and ALKBH5, suggesting its application for quantifying target modifications in separated RNAs. Furthermore, INB demonstrated that the knockdown of FTO and ALKBH5 increased the m⁶A modification in small RNAs as well as in mRNA. The INB method has high specificity, sensitivity, and quantitative capability, and it can be employed with conventional experimental apparatus. Therefore, this method would be useful for research on RNA modifications and metabolism.