Coronary Collateral Circulation in Patients of Coronary Ectasia with Significant Coronary Artery Disease

Objectives

Patients with coronary ectasia (CE) usually have coexisting coronary stenosis resulting in myoischemia. Coronary collateral plays an important role in protecting myocardium from ischemia and reducing cardiovascular events. However, limited studies investigate the role of CE in coronary collaterals development.

Methods

We evaluated 1020 consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography and 552 patients with significant coronary artery disease (SCAD), defined as diameter stenosis more than 70%, were finally analyzed. CE is defined as the ectatic diameter 1.5 times larger than adjacent reference segment. Rentrop collateral score was used to classify patients into poor (grades 0 and 1) or good (grades 2 and 3) collateral group.

Results

73 patients (13.2%) had CE lesions which were most located in the right coronary artery (53.4%). Patients with CE had a lower incidence of diabetes (43.8% vs 30.1%, p = 0.03), higher body mass index (25.4±3.5 vs 26.7±4.6, p = 0.027) and poorer coronary collateral (58.2% vs 71.2%, p = 0.040). Patients with poor collateral (n = 331) had a higher incidence of CE (15.7% vs 9.5%, p = 0.040) and fewer diseased vessels numbers (1.96±0.84 vs 2.48±0.69, p<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed diabetes (odd ratio (OR) 0.630, p = 0.026), CE (OR = 0.544, p = 0.048), and number of diseased vessels (OR = 2.488, p<0.001) were significant predictors of coronary collaterals development.

Conclusion

The presence of CE was associated with poorer coronary collateral development in patients with SCAD.     

Coronary Artery Disease with Single Coronary Artery

The authors have reviewed the literature in search of the coexistence of single coronary artery with significant coronary artery disease. Two cases of single right coronary artery are described. In both, the anomalies were unsuspected and diagnosed roentgenographically in life. Both patients had angina pectoris, positive graded-exercise stress tests, and hemodynamically significant obstruction or occlusion to the coronary arteries. In neither case was the stenosis proximal or amenable to bypass surgery.     

冠状动脉支架植入术后行冠脉旁路移植术

目的:总结15例冠状动脉支架植入术后行冠状动脉旁路移植术的临床经验。方法:回顾分析行冠状动脉支架植入术后行冠状动脉旁路移植术15例患者的资料,男10例,女5例,平均年龄(61±5)岁。行冠状动脉支架植入术后再行冠状动脉旁路移植术时间间隔(24±4)月,冠状动脉内置入支架3-6枚,左室射血分数为43%-64%,其中50%为3例。全组行体外循环下冠状动脉旁路移植术3例,行非体外循环心脏跳动下冠状动脉旁路移植术12例。结果:全组共行动脉桥吻合13支,静脉桥33支;围术期并发低心排综合征3例,肺部感染4例,胸腔内出血行胸腔闭式引流术2例,本组患者无死亡病例。术后平均住院日(13±4)天。结论:对冠状动脉内支架植入术后再狭窄或(和)冠状动脉再血管化不足的病例进行冠状动脉旁路移植治疗,可使冠状动脉达到充分再血管化,提高冠心病患者生活质量及预后。     

冠状动脉支架植入术后行冠脉旁路移植术

目的：总结15例冠状动脉支架植入术后行冠状动脉旁路移植术的临床经验。方法：回顾分析行冠状动脉支架植入术后行冠状动脉旁路移植术15例患者的资料,男10例,女5例,平均年龄（61±5）岁。行冠状动脉支架植入术后再行冠状动脉旁路移植术时间间隔（24±4）月,冠状动脉内置入支架3-6枚,左室射血分数为43％-64％,其中〈50％为3例。全组行体外循环下冠状动脉旁路移植术3例,行非体外循环心脏跳动下冠状动脉旁路移植术12例。结果：全组共行动脉桥吻合13支,静脉桥33支;围术期并发低心排综合征3例,肺部感染4例,胸腔内出血行胸腔闭式引流术2例,本组患者无死亡病例。术后平均住院日（13±4）天。结论：对冠状动脉内支架植入术后再狭窄或（和）冠状动脉再血管化不足的病例进行冠状动脉旁路移植治疗,可使冠状动脉达到充分再血管化,提高冠心病患者生活质量及预后。     

冠状动脉CT造影对冠心病的临床诊断价值研究

目的：探讨研究冠状动脉CT造影检查对冠心病的临床诊断价值。方法：收集我院2012年1月至2013年10月共计70例临床怀疑为冠心病的患者,对这些患者分别进行冠状动脉CT造影检查和数字减影冠状动脉造影（DSA）检查,记录这两项检查所得结果及数据,以检查数据为基础对冠状动脉CT造影和数字减影冠状动脉造影检查的临床实验效果进行对比研究。结果：70例病人均可顺利完成以上两种检查,按照数字减影冠状动脉造影检查的标准,冠状动脉CT造影的敏感度为92.2%,特异度为97.4%、阳性预测率为90.5%、阴性预测率98%。结论：相对于数字减影冠状动脉造影检查,冠状动脉CT造影检查是一种更加安全、可靠、无创且更具临床指导意义的检测技术,因此可以推荐作为冠心病诊断的首选方法。     

冠状动脉CT造影对冠心病的临床诊断价值研究

目的:探讨研究冠状动脉CT造影检查对冠心病的临床诊断价值。方法:收集我院2012年1月至2013年10月共计70例临床怀疑为冠心病的患者,对这些患者分别进行冠状动脉CT造影检查和数字减影冠状动脉造影(DSA)检查,记录这两项检查所得结果及数据,以检查数据为基础对冠状动脉CT造影和数字减影冠状动脉造影检查的临床实验效果进行对比研究。结果:70例病人均可顺利完成以上两种检查,按照数字减影冠状动脉造影检查的标准,冠状动脉CT造影的敏感度为92.2%,特异度为97.4%、阳性预测率为90.5%、阴性预测率98%。结论:相对于数字减影冠状动脉造影检查,冠状动脉CT造影检查是一种更加安全、可靠、无创且更具临床指导意义的检测技术,因此可以推荐作为冠心病诊断的首选方法。     

Impact of Coronary Dominance on In-Hospital Outcomes after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome

Objective

This study evaluated the manner in which coronary dominance affects in-hospital outcomes of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Background

Previous studies have shown that left dominant coronary anatomies are associated with worse prognoses in patients with coronary artery disease.

Methods

Data were analyzed from 4873 ACS patients undergoing PCI between September 2008 and April 2013 at 14 hospitals participating in the Japanese Cardiovascular Database Registry. The patients were grouped based on diagnostic coronary angiograms performed prior to PCI; those with right- or co-dominant anatomy (RD group) and those with left-dominant anatomy (LD group).

Results

The average patient age was 67.6±11.8 years and both patient groups had similar ages, coronary risk factors, comorbidities, and prior histories. The numbers of patients presenting with symptoms of heart failure, cardiogenic shock, or cardiopulmonary arrest were significantly higher in the LD group than in the RD group (heart failure: 650 RD patients [14.7%] vs. 87 LD patients [18.8%], P = 0.025; cardiogenic shock: 322 RD patients [7.3%] vs. 48 LD patients [10.3%], P = 0.021; and cardiopulmonary arrest: 197 RD patients [4.5%] vs. 36 LD patients [7.8%], P = 0.003). In-hospital mortality was significantly higher among LD patients than among RD patients (182 RD patients [4.1%] vs. 36 LD patients [7.8%], P = 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that LD anatomy was an independent predictor for in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 1.75; 95% confidence interval, 1.06–2.89; P = 0.030).

Conclusion

Among ACS patients who underwent PCI, LD patients had significantly worse in-hospital outcomes compared with RD patients, and LD anatomy was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality.