Incidence of dual AV node physiology following termination of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia by adenosine-5'-triphosphate: a comparison with drug administration in sinus rhythm

Administration of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) in sinus rhythm identifies dual atrioventricular node physiology (DAVNP) in 75% of patients with inducible slow/fast AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). The incidence of DAVNP following termination of AVNRT with ATP is unknown. Incremental doses of ATP (10-60 mg) were administered, first in sinus rhythm and then during tachycardia induced at electrophysiologic study, to 84 patients with inducible AVNRT and to 18 control patients with inducible AV reentrant tachycardia (AVRT) and no electrophysiologic evidence of DAVNP. Study end-points were the occurrence of DAVNP or > or = 2nd degree AV block following administration of ATP in sinus rhythm and tachycardia termination following administration of ATP during tachycardia. Of the 82 patients with AVNRT who completed the study, 62 (75.6%) exhibited DAVNP following administration of 17.1 +/- 9.4 mg ATP in sinus rhythm, while 30 (36.5%) exhibited DAVNP at the termination of AVNRT following administration of 10.6 +/- 2.4 mg ATP. The occurrence of DAVNP following the administration of 10 mg ATP in sinus rhythm.was a good predictor (62%) of its occurrence after termination of AVNRT with ATP. The dose of ATP had a strong correlation between the presence of DAVNP following AVNRT termination and the ATP doses needed for tachycardia termination. Of the 18 control patients, none had DAVNP at ATP test during sinus rhythm but 1 (5.5%) showed slight (60 msec) PR jump after termination of AVRT with ATP. In conclusion, DAVNP is present in a relatively high proportion (36.5%) of patients following termination of AVNRT with ATP but is much less frequent (5.5%) in control patients. Thus, findings at termination of tachycardia by ATP may be useful in the noninvasive diagnosis of the mechanism of a paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia.     

Coronary sinus cannulation predicts atrioventricular nodal reentry as mechanism of supraventricular tachycardia

IntroductionCommon clinical teaching, for invasive electrophysiology, is that if the first year fellow cannulates the coronary sinus (CS) in his first attempt, the arrhythmia is more likely to be atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT). This general perception has not yet been clinically tested. We evaluated this theory in prospective patients undergoing an electrophysiological study (EPS) for paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT).MethodsCohort study. CS ease of cannulation (CSCS) was graded as: 1) 1st year fellow cannulates in first attempt; 2) 1st year fellow needs more than one attempt or maneuver to cannulate the CS; 3) staff physician cannulates in first attempt after the fellow was unsuccessful; 4) staff physician requires more than one maneuver to cannulate the CS; 5) staff physician judges that the cannulation process was extremely difficult.ResultsOf the 1361 patients undergoing EPS in our institution, 165 were selected. Age was 49 ± 15 years. AVNRT occurred in 77.6%, atrioventricular reentry tachycardia (AVRT) in 15.1% and atrial tachycardia (AT) in 7.3% of cases. The CSCS = 1 was more prevalent in AVNRT, 89% versus 68% AVRT and 58.3% of AT (P = 0.0005). Patients with CSCS = 1 have a higher chance of the PSVT being AVNRT (odds ratio: 4.41; 95CI: 1.84–10.56; P = 0.0009).ConclusionThe CSCS predicts the likelihood of the induced PSVT being AVNRT as compared to AVRT and AT. More studies are required to try to associate this finding to clinical patient characteristics to create a score for PSVT mechanism prediction.     

AV Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia Causing Inappropriate ICD Shocks In A Patient With Arrhythmogenic RV Dysplasia

We report a patient with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) for arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia (ARVD) who received inappropriate shocks for atrioventricular node reentry tachycardia (AVRNT). Patient had multiple shocks for tachycardia with EGM characteristics of very short VA interval and CL of 300 msec. An electrophysiologic (EP) study reproducibly induced typical AVNRT with similar features. The slow AV nodal pathway ablation resolved the ICD shocks. Despite increasingly sophisticated discrimination algorithms available in modern ICDs, the ability to differentiate SVT from VT can be challenging. Our patient received inappropriate shocks for AVNRT. When device interrogation alone is not conclusive, an EP study may be necessary to determine the appropriate therapeutic course.     

Atrioventricular Nodal Re-entry Tachycardia in Identical Twins: A Case Report and Literature Review

This report details the case of 17 year old identical twins who both presented with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT). Electrophysiological studies revealed atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) in both twins. Successful but technically challenging slow pathway ablation was performed in both twins. This is the first reported case of confirmed AVNRT in identical twins which adds strong evidence to heritability of the dual AV node physiology and AVNRT. A review of the current literature regarding PSVT in monozygotic twins is provided.     

Uncommon presentation of a common tachycardia

We describe a patient with an implanted pacemaker for impaired AV conduction who presented with an incessant tachycardia. EP study showed that the tachycardia was atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) with repeated spontaneous initiation because of poor or absent antegrade fast pathway conduction. Slow pathway ablation was successful in terminating the tachycardia and making it non-inducible.     

Simultaneous dual AV node antegrade conduction (2 for 1) and lower common pathway (2–1) block illustrate AVNRT physiology

We report a rare case of spontaneous initiation of Atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) via 2 for 1 phenomenon, into a 2:1 AV block due to lower common pathway block and finally transition to 1:1 tachycardia. The premature atrial p wave traverses down both the fast and slow pathway simultaneously during 2 for 1 initiation and is met with subsequent typical AVNRT with 2:1 block. Infranodal location of the block is confirmed on electrophysiologic testing and is also cured by intervention. This rare electrographic presentation is not only pathognomonic for AVNRT with lower common pathway block but also illustrates its dual conduction physiology.     

Change in VA interval by a single atrial premature depolarization - What is the mechanism?

A long VA tachycardia during a typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) can be a concomitant atypical AVNRT, atrial tachycardia or rarely atrio-ventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT). There are reported associations of AVNRT with other tachycardia substrates. Maneuvers are useful for differentiating the mechanism of the second tachycardia. Atrial tachycardia (AT) is one common association. When the AT originates from the lower triangle of Koch/near coronary sinus ostium, it can mimic slow-slow/fast-slow AVNRT. We encountered an interesting case where a longer VA tachycardia got reproducibly induced when a critically timed atrial premature depolarisation was delivered on typical AVNRT. It was proved to be an AT. A slow pathway modification in the lower TOK was successful to eliminate both the tachycardia substrate.     

经食道心房调搏术及食道心电图在心律失常中的应用

目的:分析经食道心房调搏术(TEAP)及食道内心电图(EECG)在心律失常中的应用价值。方法:选取2018年6月至2019年12月于我院行食道心电图及经食道调搏的患者189例,其中男80例,女109例,年龄11~83岁。结果:54例为房室结折返性心动过速(AVNRT),34例为房室折返性心动过速(AVRT),8例为房性心动过速(AT),4例为心房扑动(AF),6例为心房颤动(Af),5例为室性心过速,78例为室早或其他。共105例心律失常患者拟行食道心房调搏终止心动过速,所有AVNRT和AVRT患者及17例AT患者经食道心房调搏S1S1成功转为窦律,50例AVNRT、32例AVRT、6例AT、3例AF及2例VT患者通过射频消融术成功根治。其中1例11岁AT患者因无法耐受食道调搏,未能转为窦律,患者经静推普罗帕酮后次日转为窦律。共97例患者拟行食道心房调搏诱发,共49例诱发出心动过速,1例左后分支型室速经静滴异丙肾上腺素后诱发心动过速,且仍需静滴异丙肾上腺素后经心房食道调博终止心动过速,后经射频消融术成功根治。结论:TEAP及EECG可用于复杂心律失常的诊断及治疗,是一种相对安全、临床容易掌握的技术,值得推广。     

Measure twice, cut once: pitfalls in the diagnosis of supraventricular tachycardia

In atrioventricular nodal and atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia, the relative timing of atrial and ventricular activation may sometimes be very similar, even during electrophysiological studies, and this may lead to an erroneous diagnosis and inappropriate treatment. As examples, we describe two cases that were recently referred to our hospital for a second opinion and treatment of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. In both, the original diagnosis of the referring centres was commontype atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Catheter ablation in those centres was unsuccessful. During our electrophysiological studies, however, an atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia was demonstrated, using a concealed accessory pathway for retrograde conduction in both patients. The accessory atrioventricular connection was successfully ablated and on follow-up both patients remained free of symptoms without medication. These findings illustrate the importance of complete electrophysiological analysis even for apparently simple supraventricular arrhythmias. (Neth Heart J 2010;18:78–84.)     

Simultaneous Accessory Pathway and AV Node Mechanical Block

We report a clinical case of a 22-year-old female referred to our institution due to palpitations and preexcitation. Her ECG suggested a right superior paraseptal accessory pathway (AP), which was localised during the electrophysiological study at the superior paraseptal region in close proximity to the His recordings. Reproducible orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia was induced by atrial pacing with extrastimuli. Cryo-mapping performed in the area of earliest atrial activation was not able to terminate the tachycardia. A second attempt, slightly more posterior, caused mechanical block of the AP, which rendered the tachycardia non-inducible. More pressure with the ablation catheter determined a Wenckebach type supra-hisian AV block, which was transient but reproducible. Given this finding no ablation was done. Simultaneous block to the AP and the atrioventricular node has rarely been reported using radiofrequency energy. However, to our knowledge this phenomenon has not been previously reported in large series using cryo-thermal energy.     

Catheter Ablation of Right-Sided Accessory Pathways in Adults Using the Three-Dimensional Mapping System: A Randomized Comparison to the Conventional Approach

Three-dimensional (3D) mapping and navigation systems have been widely used for the ablation of atrial fibrillation and ventricular tachycardia, but the applicability of these systems for the ablation of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) due to right-sided accessory pathways (RAPs) remains unknown. The goal of this prospective randomized study was to compare the safety, efficiency, and efficacy of nonfluoroscopic and conventional fluoroscopic mapping techniques in guiding catheter ablation of SVT due to RAPs. Of the 393 consecutive patients with SVT who were randomized to receive either conventional fluoroscopic or Ensite NavX mapping-guided ablation, 64 patients with RAPs were included for analysis. Endpoints for ablation were no evidence of RAP conduction and no inducible atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT). The 3D group showed fewer ablation pulses and a shorter total ablation time compared to the conventional group, although the acute procedural success did not differ significantly between the two groups. Total procedure time, electrophysiological study time, total fluoroscopy time, and cumulative radiation doses were also significantly reduced in the 3D group. Patients in the conventional group with a right atrium diameter (RAD) ≥ 47 mm required a longer fluoroscopy time. There was no significant difference in the recurrence rates between the two groups over a follow-up period of 3 to 29 months. There were no permanent complications. The 3D mapping system may be a preferred alternative for patients with AVRT due to RAPs, especially for patients with a large RAD (≥ 47 mm).     

Orthodromic atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia using a concealed isoproterenol-sensitive accessory pathway

Accessory pathways (APs) represent the substrate for atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia. Catecholamine-sensitivity is an uncommon feature of APs and has been almost exclusively been described in APs with antegrade conduction. We present the rare case of a catecholamine-dependent concealed AP that was only unmasked upon isoproterenol stimulation and successfully ablated. This case highlights the importance of systematic isoproterenol stimulation in patients referred for ablation of supraventricular tachycardia - in particular if the baseline electrophysiology study is negative. Otherwise, ablation targets may be missed.Learning objectiveThe absence of retrograde ventriculo-atrial conduction does not automatically exclude the presence of a concealed accessory pathway. Systematic isoproterenol stimulation should be part of any electrophysiology study for supraventricular tachycardia, to search for catecholamine-sensitive accessory pathways that may be otherwise missed.     

Left sided ablation for Atrioventricular Nodal Re-entrant Tachycardia: Frequency,Characteristics and Outcomes

BackgroundLeft-sided ablation, targeting left inferior AV nodal extensions, is thought to be necessary for success in a small proportion of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) ablations; however Indian data are scarce in this regard.MethodsConsecutive cases of AVNRT undergoing slow pathway ablation in a single centre over an 18-month period were retrospectively analyzed. Left-sided ablation at the posteroseptal mitral annulus was performed if right-sided ablation failed to abolish AVNRT.ResultsFrom January 2017 to June 2018, out of 215 consecutive supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) cases, 154 (71.6%) were AVNRT (47.1 ± 13.1 years, 46.1% male). Trans-septal ablation was required in 5 (3.2%) cases (mean age 48.8 ± 9.4 years; 4 female, 1 male); all with typical (slow-fast) form of AVNRT. Compared with cases needing only right-sided ablation, radiofrequency time (50.8 ± 16.9 vs. 9.9 ± 8.5 min; p = 0.005) and procedure time (166.0 ± 35.0 vs 79.6 ± 35.9 min; p = 0.004) were significantly longer for trans-septal cases, while baseline intervals and tachycardia cycle length were not significantly different. Junctional ectopy was seen in only 2 of the 5 cases during left-sided ablation, but acute success (non-inducibility) was obtained in 3 cases. There were no instances of AV block. Over mean follow-up of 12.2 ± 4.0 months, clinical recurrence of AVNRT occurred in one case, while others remained arrhythmia-free without medication.ConclusionLeft-sided ablation was required in a small proportion of AVNRT ablations. Trans-septal approach targeting the posteroseptal mitral annulus was safe and yielded good mid-term clinical success.     

The HAV pattern in pediatric patients with atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia

ObjectivesThe purpose of this study is to assess the prevalence of a His-Atrial-Ventricular (HAV) pattern, i.e. the atrial electrogram following the His bundle -HB- electrogram and preceding the ventricular one, on the catheter placed in the His position in pediatric patients during typical atrioventricular node reentry (AVNRT).Materials and methodsThe pediatric electrophysiology databases of two separate institutions were queried for patients with a diagnosis of AVNRT. Demographic, clinical data and the electrophysiology study (EPS) information were assessed.ResultsThirty-nine consecutive patients were included. Twenty-five were female. The average age at the time of the EPS was 12 ± 3.7 years. Induction was achieved with atrial pacing in 23, with a single atrial extra stimulus in 8 and with dual atrial extra stimuli in 8. Isoproterenol was needed to induce tachycardia in 21. Tachycardia cycle length averaged 320 ± 50 ms. An HAV pattern was present in 35 (74%) of the patients, and in 100% of the patients younger than 8.ConclusionsAn HAV pattern on the catheter placed in the His position, is common in pediatric patients with AVNRT, occurring in up to 74% of the patients in this population, being more common in younger patients.     

Unusual cause of cardiomyopathy in a young woman

Dual atrioventricular nodal nonreentrant tachycardia (DAVNNT) is a rare form of supraventricular tachycardia. In some patients, the presence of a dual pathway physiology results in two paths in the atrioventricular (AV) node with different conduction velocities. An atrial impulse arriving at the AV node may unfold and travel along these two pathways simultaneously, causing two ventricular activations. Thus, the ventricular rate will be twice the atrial rate. DAVNNT is less common than AVNRT, but its frequency may be underestimated.The ECG is crucial to suspect the diagnosis. At first glance it looks like an irregular tachycardia, but a more careful look shows a rhythmic pattern. A sinus P wave followed by two QRS complexes (narrow or wide) should raise suspicion of this arrhythmia.It is often unnoticed by the patient, and ventricular dysfunction due to tachycardiomyopathy is not uncommon. The response of DAVNNT to medication, including beta-blockers, flecainide, and amiodarone is very poor or absent, so the treatment of choice is slow pathway ablation. We report a Case of cardiomyopathy caused by this entity.     

Principles of entrainment: diagnostic utility for supraventricular tachycardia

Entrainment is an important pacing maneuver that can be used to identify reentry as a tachycardia mechanism and define components of the circuit. This review examines how principles of entrainment can be used to arrive at a firm supraventricular tachycardia diagnosis using a simple algorithm and builds a foundation for the application of entrainment to more complex or unknown circuits.     

Experimental analysis of the formation of macro-reentry in the right atrium of rabbits

The aim of the present study was experimental demonstration of the formation of reentry in isolated preparations of the rabbit's right atrium, including sulcus terminalis, interatrial septum and AV node. Tachycardia was evoked by extrasystolic stimulation of the preparation. Reentry was identified by computerized multichannel mapping of excitation wave propagation. A series of sections performed in the area between the caval veins and the coronary sinus confirmed the presence of reentry pathway round the orifices of caval veins and through AV made zone. Local cooling and sections performed in different parts of the AV node showed that not all areas of AV node were involved in the formation of reentry, but only the perinodal (AN) area. These effects on the AN area terminated tachycardia. Linear dependence between the period of tachycardia and delay in the AV nodal zone was found.     

Double-gap-in-roof reentrant tachycardia following surgical thoracoscopic atrial fibrillation ablation

A case of macro-reentrant tachycardia associated with a box lesion after thoracoscopis left atrial surgical atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation yet to be described. The goal was to clarify the mechanisms and electrophysiological characteristics of this type of tachycardia.A patient was admitted for an EP study following surgical thoracoscopic AF ablation (box lexion formation by right-sided Cobra thoracoscopic ablation). Thoracoscopic ablation was done as the first step of the hybrid ablation approach to the persistent AF; the second step was the EP study. At the EP study, he presented with incessant regular tachycardia (cycle length of 226 ms). An EP study with conventional, 3D activation and entrainment mapping was done to assess the tachycardia mechanism. Two conduction gaps in the superior line (roofline) between the superior pulmonary veins were discovered. The tachycardia was successfully treated with a radiofrequency application near the gap close to the left superior pulmonary vein; however, following tachycardia termination, pulmonary vein isolation was absent. A second radiofrequency application, close to the roof of the right superior pulmonary, vein closed the gap in the box and led to the isolation of all 4 pulmonary veins. No atrial tachycardia recurred during the 6-month follow-up.Conduction gaps in box lesion created by thoracospcopic ablation can present as a novel type of man-made tachycardia after surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Activation and entrainment mapping is necessary for an accurate diagnosis.     

Interesting electrophysiological findings in a patient with coincidental right ventricular outflow tract and atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

Tachycardia induced tachycardias are not common in clinical practice, and it is believed that most cases of double tachycardia are coincidental. The existence of two different tachycardias in the same patient almost always poses problems in the electrophysiology laboratory. However, in rare instances, the emergence of a second tachycardia can actually provide invaluable information about the first one. In this report, we describe a 30-year-old woman who presented with palpitations. Electrophysiological study revealed that atrial programmed stimulation at baseline induced right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) tachycardia and supraventricular tachycardia. The study also showed that each of the tachycardias was able to induce the other. A short run of RVOT tachycardia during supraventricular tachycardia was able to entrain the latter. This finding provided important information about the nature of the supraventricular tachycardia, which proved to be atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Both of these tachycardias were successfully ablated, and the patient's palpitations disappeared.     

Correlation between the sudden jump-like increases of the atrio-Hisian interval induced during burst atrial pacing and during programmed atrial stimulation in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

Purpose

To study the correlation between the sudden prolongations of the atrio-Hisian (AH) interval with ≥50 ms during burst and programmed atrial stimulation, and to define whether the AH jump during burst atrial pacing is a reliable diagnostic criterion for dual AV nodal physiology.