Photoperiodic time measurement in the aphid Megoura viciae

Megoura produces parthenogenetic virginoparae in long day conditions, gamic oviparae in short days. The nature of this photoperiodic response has been analysed by rearing parent apterae in a wide range of circadian and non-circadian light cycles. By varying the light and dark components independently in a two-component cycle it has been established that the time measuring function is associated primarily with the dark period. There is no evidence that an endogenous circadian oscillation is implicated: thus (a) the ‘short day’ response is abolished by ‘night interruptions’ positioned in the early or late night. But this bimodal response pattern remains unchanged when the duration of the ‘main’ photoperiod is varied from ca. 6 hr to at least 25·5 hr. The stability of the maxima within the scotophase is inconsistent with the ‘coincidence’ models of photoperiodic timing that have been proposed. It is suggested that the essential timing process operates on the hour-glass principle, beginning anew with the onset of each period of darkness; (b) night interruption experiments employing very long (up to 72 hr) scanned dark periods yielded response maxima explicable in terms of the hour-glass hypothesis but did not reveal any circadian relationship between the maxima.The ‘dark reaction’ comprises a sequence of four stages, definable by the effects of light. Stage 1, extending from dark hr 0 to ca. 2·5, is fully photoreversible: at the next dark period the entire timing sequence is repeated up to the 9·5 hr critical night length. Towards the end of stage 1 reversibility is gradually lost and after a light interruption the reaction is resumed from a later time equivalent than dark hr 0; the subsequent critical night length is therefore reduced. The extent of the photoreversal is related to light duration. The period of maximum light insensitivity (stage 2) is attained at the end of the fourth hour. From ca. dark hr 5 to just short of the critical night length light exerts an increasingly promotive action which favours the production of virginoparae. This dark process is not photoreversible. Stage 4, which begins at hr 9·5, marks the end of the timing sequence. Light will not then annul the non-promotive action of the previous long night.Light has three effects which are determined by its duration and position within the cycle. The two terminal effects, mentioned above, are associated with the interception of dark stages 1 and 3 by either short (1 hr) or longer photoperiods. Light also prepares or primes the dark period timer. Thus the critical length is increased, and timing accuracy lost, if the preceding photoperiod is less than ca. 6 hr. Light during stage 4 has a priming action but no terminal function. Repeated cycles are ‘read’ in various ways, depending on the cycle structure. For example, if light intercepts stage 3, a two-component cycle is interpreted as the overlapping sequence light/dark/light. One and the same photoperiod then acts terminally in respect of the preceding dark period and as a primer for the next dark period.There is also a mechanism for summing the promotive effects produced by repeated interruption of dark stage 3. With complex (four-component) cycles both halves of the same cycle may contribute. ‘Product accumulation’ falls below threshold if the frequency of presentation of a given promotive cycle is too low. This occurs if there are very long, relatively non-promotive dark components. Such cycles are accepted as ‘continuous darkness’.     

Three different diel rhythms of the calling song in the cricket,Gryllus campestris,and their control mechanisms*

ABSTRACT. Males of the cricket, Gryllus campestris L. (Orthoptera: Gryllidae), displayed three different diel patterns in the timing of their calling song: 55% of all males investigated were dark-active, 25% light-active and 20% light-and-dark-active. Dark-active males continued to stridulate in both constant darkness (DD) and constant light (LL) during the subjective night, with a circadian period usually shorter (in DD) or longer (in LL) than 24h. Light-active males were mainly silent in DD but showed a circadian rhythm in LL, though with a 180° phase shift, i.e. activity during subjective night. This suggests that daytime activity has developed from nocturnal activity by a mechanism which prevents stridulation during darkness, and that both patterns are driven by the same endogenous clock. In the light-and-dark-active males some stridulation takes place during darkness, so dark inhibition is not complete. Such incomplete inhibition seemed to occur only in highly active animals. The three diel distribution patterns of the calling song are discussed in relation to sharing the chances of attracting females.     

Entrainment of the Two-Peak Circadian Rhythm of Trigonoscelis gigas Reitter (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) with non-24-hr Zeitgebers

Circadian rhythms of locomotor activity of the desert beetles T.gigas were entrained with skeleton photoperiods (2x2 hr per circadian cycle 30 lx green LED light pulses). The Zeitgeber period was stepwise reduced by 1 hr down to 22 hr or increased up to 26 hr. Within the range of entrainment, the phase angle Ψ of a circadian rhythm with respect to light depends upon the period of Zeitgeber differently for the morning (M) and evening (E) peak: M is easier to advance, while E is easier to delay. Beyond the range of entrainment both peaks became free-running with some relative coordination. Masking (direct stimulation of activity by light) occurred only during the subjective night, and never in subjective day. In few cases one of two peaks became free-running while its counterpart remained entrained, suggesting that each of the two peaks has its own visual input and can be entrained by light. These results are in agreement with the difference in the PRC shape for the M and E peaks, and support the hypothesis that M and E peaks are controlled by two functionally separate oscillators that have polar different properties, and are extremely strongly mutually coupled with phases locked at about 180°.     

Plasma Corticosterone, Motor Activity and Metabolic Circadian Patterns in Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Rats

Experiments were conducted in male rats to study the effects of streptozotocin-induced diabetes on circadian rhythms of (a) plasma corticosterone concentrations; (b) motor activity; and (c) metabolic patterns. Animals were entrained to LD cycles of 12: 12 hr and fed ad libitum.

A daily rhythm of plasma corticosterone concentrations was found in controls animals with peak levels at 2400 hr and low values during the remaining hours. This rhythm was statistically confirmed by the cosinor method and had an amplitude of 3.37μg/100 ml and the acrophase at 100 hr. A loss of the normal circadian variation was observed in diabetic animals, with a nadir at the onset of light period and high values throughout the remaining hours; cosinor analysis of these data showed no circadian rhythm, delete and a higher mean level than controls.

As expected, normal rats presented most of their motor activity during the dark period with 80+ of total daily activity; the cosinor method demonstrated a circadian rhythm with an amplitude of 60+ of the mean level and the acrophase at 0852 hr. Both diabetic and control rats showed a similar activity during the light phase, but diabetic animals had less activity than controls during the night and their percentage of total daily activity was similar in both phases of the LD cycle (50+ for each one). With the cosinor method we were able to show the persistence of a circadian rhythm in the motor activity of diabetic rats, but with a mesor and amplitude lower than in controls (amplitude rested at 60+ of the mean level) and its acrophase advanced to 0148 hr.

The metabolic activity pattern of diabetic rats also changed: whereas controls showed a greater metabolic activity during the night (70+ food; 82+ water; 54+ urine; 67+ faeces), diabetics did not show differences between both phases of the LD cycle. Water ingested and urine excreted by the diabetic group were higher than normal during light and dark periods; food consumed and faeces excreted were higher than controls only in the light phase.

These data suggest that alterations in circadian rhythms of plasma corticosterone and motor activity are consecutive to the loss of the feeding circadian pattern, due to polyphagia and polydipsia showed by these animals, which need to extend intakes during the light and dark phases.     

Circadian locomotor rhythm masked by the female reproduction cycle in cockroaches

Blattella bisignata (Brunner) and B. germanica (L.) are oviparous cockroaches with cyclic reproductive behaviour, but in B. germanica only males show circadian rhythmicity of locomotion at 28°C and DD (constant darkness). In B. bisignata, males and virgin females cockroaches entrained by light–dark cycles show free‐running rhythmicity in DD, and most activities occur during the subjective night. Daily locomotor activities of virgin females show cyclic changes that coincided with ovarian development. Virgin females also exhibit calling behaviour during the subjective night, and this shows a free‐running rhythm. Male mate‐finding locomotion and female calling behaviour are under circadian control, so the timing for both behaviours is synchronized. However, most mated females do not show a locomotor free‐running rhythm under DD conditions. Our results indicate that only mated females could not express a circadian locomotor rhythm. Pregnancy reduces a female’s locomotory intensity and masks the expression of a circadian locomotor rhythm. We attribute the differences in circadian locomotory rhythms between these two species to their living environments and mate‐finding strategies.     

Internal Desynchronisation in Blow Fly (Calliphora vicina) Locomotor Activity Rhythms: Evidence for a Complex Circadian Pacemaker

The majority of blow flies (Calliphora vicina) display circadian locomotor activity rhythms that free-run with an unchanging period (τ) in darkness (DD), or entrain to a light-dark cycle (LD 1:23). However, a minority produce more complex patterns (spontaneous changes in τ, arrhythmicity, or 'split' rhythms) in DD, or undergo rhythm dissociation ('internal desynchronisation') when the light pulses of LD 1:23 initially illuminate the subjective night. These patterns are interpreted as evidence for a complex, multioscillatory and multicellular, structure of the insects' circadian system, and this complexity is discussed in terms of the neuronal architecture of the fly's brain.     

Characterization of Circadian Behavior in the Starlet Sea Anemone,Nematostella vectensis

Background

Although much is known about how circadian systems control daily cycles in the physiology and behavior of Drosophila and several vertebrate models, marine invertebrates have often been overlooked in circadian rhythms research. This study focuses on the starlet sea anemone, Nematostella vectensis, a species that has received increasing attention within the scientific community for its potential as a model research organism. The recently sequenced genome of N. vectensis makes it an especially attractive model for exploring the molecular evolution of circadian behavior. Critical behavioral data needed to correlate gene expression patterns to specific behaviors are currently lacking in N. vectensis.

Methodology/Principal Findings

To detect the presence of behavioral oscillations in N. vectensis, locomotor activity was evaluated using an automated system in an environmentally controlled chamber. Animals exposed to a 24 hr photoperiod (12 hr light: 12 hr dark) exhibited locomotor behavior that was both rhythmic and predominantly nocturnal. The activity peak occurred in the early half of the night with a 2-fold increase in locomotion. Upon transfer to constant lighting conditions (constant light or constant dark), an approximately 24 hr rhythm persisted in most animals, suggesting that the rhythm is controlled by an endogenous circadian mechanism. Fourier analysis revealed the presence of multiple peaks in some animals suggesting additional rhythmic components could be present. In particular, an approximately 12 hr oscillation was often observed. The nocturnal increase in generalized locomotion corresponded to a 24 hr oscillation in animal elongation.

Conclusions/Significance

These data confirm the presence of a light-entrainable circadian clock in Nematostella vectensis. Additional components observed in some individuals indicate that an endogenous clock of approximately 12 hr frequency may also be present. By describing rhythmic locomotor behavior in N. vectensis, we have made important progress in developing the sea anemone as a model organism for circadian rhythm research.     

Constant light disrupts the circadian but not the circatidal rhythm in mangrove crickets

Mangrove crickets have a circatidal activity rhythm (~12.6 h cycles) with a circadian modulation under constant darkness (DD), whereby activity levels are higher during subjective night low tides than subjective day low tides. This study explored the locomotor activity rhythm of mangrove crickets under constant light (LL). Under LL, the crickets also exhibited a clear circatidal activity rhythm with a free-running period of 12.6 ± 0.26 h (mean ± SD, n = 6), which was not significantly different from that observed under DD. In contrast, activity levels were almost the same between subjective day and night, unlike those under DD, which were greater during subjective night. The loss of circadian modulation under LL may be explained by the suspension of the circadian clock in these conditions. These results strongly suggest that the circatidal activity rhythm is driven by its own clock system, distinct from the circadian clock.     

Activity feedback to the mammalian circadian pacemaker: influence on observed measures of rhythm period length.

In the mouse, activity is precisely timed by the circadian clock and is normally most intense in the early subjective night. Since vigorous activity (e.g., wheel running) is thought to induce phase shifts in rodents, the temporal placement of daily exercise/activity could be a determinant of observed circadian rhythm period. The relationship between spontaneous running-wheel activity and the circadian period of free-running rhythms was studied to assess this possibility. With ad libitum access to a running wheel, mice exhibited a free-running period (tau) of 23.43 +/- 0.08 hr (mean +/- SEM). When running wheels were locked, tau increased (23.88 +/- 0.04 hr, p less than 0.03), and restoration of ad libitum wheel running again produced a shorter period (tau = 23.56 +/- 0.06 hr, p less than 0.05). A survey of free-running activity patterns in a population of 100 mice revealed a significant correlation between the observed circadian period and the time of day in which spontaneous wheel running occurred (r = 0.7314, p less than 0.0001). Significantly shorter periods were observed when running was concentrated at the beginning of the subjective night (tau = 23.23 +/- 0.04), and longer periods were observed if mice ran late in the subjective night (tau = 23.89 +/- 0.04), F (1, 99) = 34.96, p less than 0.0001. It was previously believed that the period of the circadian clock was primarily responsive to externally imposed tonic or phasic events. Systematic influences of spontaneous exercise on tau demonstrate that physiological and/or behavioral determinants of circadian timekeeping exist as well.     

Entrainment of 2 subjective nights by daily light:dark:light:dark cycles in 3 rodent species

Recent work with exotic 24-h light:dark:light:dark (LDLD) cycles indicates surprising flexibility in the entrainment patterns of Syrian hamsters. Following exposure to an LDLD cycle, hamsters may adopt a form of rhythm splitting in which markers of subjective night (e.g., activity, melatonin) are expressed in each of the twice daily scotophases. This pattern contrasts markedly with that of conventionally entrained hamsters in which markers of subjective night are expressed once daily in only 1 of the 2 dark periods. The "split" entrainment pattern was examined further here in Syrian and Siberian hamsters and in mice exposed to LDLD 7:5:7:5, a condition that reliably induces split activity rhythms in all 3 species. The phase angle of entrainment and activity duration were generally similar comparing the 2 daily activity bouts in each species. The stability of this split entrainment state was assessed by deletions of photophases on individual days, by exposure to skeleton photoperiods, and by transfer to constant darkness. As in Syrian hamsters, the one-time substitution of darkness for one 7-h photophase did not grossly alter activity patterns of Siberian hamsters but acutely disrupted the split rhythms of mice. Skeleton light pulses of progressively shorter duration did not significantly alter split entrainment patterns of either Syrian or Siberian hamsters. Both species continued to exhibit stable entrainment with activity expressed in alternate scotophases of an LD 1:5 cycle presented 4 times daily. In contrast, the split activity rhythms of mice were not maintained under skeleton pulses. In constant darkness, rhythms of Siberian hamsters remained distinctly split for a minimum of 2 cycles. Split entrainment to these novel LDLD and 4-pulse skeleton lighting regimes demonstrates a marked degree of plasticity common to the circadian systems of several rodent species and identifies novel entrainment patterns that may be reliably elicited with simple environmental manipulations. Inter- and intraspecific differences in the stability of split activity rhythms likely reflect differences in coupling interactions between the component circadian oscillators, which, adopting separate phase relations to these novel LD cycles, yield a split entrainment pattern.     

Serotonin phase-shifts the circadian rhythm of locomotor activity in the cockroach

Serotonin, a putative neurotransmitter in insects, was found to cause consistent phase shifts of the circadian rhythm of locomotor activity of the cockroach Leucophaea maderae when administered during the early subjective night as a series of 4-microliters pulses (one every 15 min) for either 3 or 6 hr. Six-hour treatments with dopamine also caused significant phase shifts during the early subjective night, but 3-hr treatments with dopamine had no phase-shifting effect. Other substances tested in early subjective night (norepinephrine, octopamine, gamma-aminobutyric acid, glutamate, carbachol, histamine, tryptophan, tryptamine, N-acetyl serotonin, or 5-hydroxyindole-3-acetic acid) did not consistently cause phase shifts. The phase-shifting effect of serotonin was found to be phase-dependent. The phase response curve (PRC) for serotonin treatments was different from the PRC for light. Like light, serotonin caused phase delays in the late subjective day and early subjective night, but serotonin did not phase-shift rhythms when tested at phases where light causes phase advances.     

The effects of feedback lighting on the circadian drinking rhythm in the diurnal new world primate Saimiri sciureus

Feedback lighting provides illumination primarily during the subjective night (i.e., the photosensitive portion of the circadian cycle) in response to a given behavior. This technique has previously been used to test the nonparametric model of entrainment in nocturnal rodents. In three species (Rattus norvegicus, Mesocricetus auratus, and Mus musculus), the free-running period of the locomotor activity rhythm was similar whether the animals were exposed to continuous light or discrete light pulses occurring essentially only during the subjective night (i.e., feedback lighting). In the current experiments, feedback lighting was presented to squirrel monkeys so that light fell predominantly during the subjective night. Feedback lighting was linked to the drinking behavior in this diurnal primate so that when the animal drank, the lights went out. Despite the seemingly adverse predicament, the monkeys maintained regular circadian drinking rhythms. Furthermore, just as the period of the free-running activity rhythms of nocturnal rodents exposed to continuous light or feedback lighting were similar, the period of the drinking rhythms of the squirrel monkeys in continuous light and feedback lighting were comparable (25.6 +/- 0.1 and 25.9 +/- 0.1 hours, respectively), despite a substantial decrease in the total amount of light exposure associated with feedback lighting. The free-running period of monkeys exposed to continuous dark (24.5 +/- 0.1 hours) was significantly shorter than either of the two lighting conditions (P < 0.001). The results presented for the drinking rhythm were confirmed by examination of the temperature and activity rhythms. Therefore, discrete light pulses given predominately during the subjective night are capable of simulating the effects of continuous light on the free-running period of the circadian rhythms of a diurnal primate. The response of squirrel monkeys to feedback lighting thus lends further support for the model and suggests that the major entrainment mechanisms are similar in nocturnal rodents and diurnal primates.     

Light pulses entrain the circadian activity rhythm of a diurnal rodent (Ammospermophilus leucurus)

Circadian rhythms of wheel-running activity of the antelope ground squirrel (Ammospermophilus leucurus) were entrained by light-dark cycles (LD: 100 1x vs total darkness) with periods (T) between ca 23.75 and 24.75 hr. Two 1-hr light pulses per cycle ('skeleton photoperiods') with T = 24.25 hr as well as one 1-hr light pulse per cycle with Ts of 23.75 and 24.25 hr were effective in entraining the circadian activity rhythms in at least 50% of the antelope ground squirrels. Phase and period responses to single 1-hr light pulses were measured which depend on the initial phase and period of the rhythm. It is concluded that discrete (phasic) light input contributes to the mechanism of entrainment to LD cycles in diurnal rodents.     

Seasonal changes in entrainment cues for the circadian rhythm of the supratidal amphipod Talorchestia longicornis

The supratidal amphipod Talorchestia longicornis Say has a circadian rhythm in activity, in which it is active on the substrate surface at night and inactive in burrows during the day. The present study determined: (1) the circadian rhythms in individual versus groups of amphipods; (2) the range of temperature cycles that entrain the circadian rhythm; (3) entrainment by high-temperature cycles versus light?:?dark cycles, and (4) seasonal substrate temperature cycles. The circadian rhythm was determined by monitoring temporal changes in surface activity using a video system. Individual and groups of amphipods have similar circadian rhythms. Entrainment occurred only to temperature cycles that included temperatures below 20°C (10–20, 15–20, 17–19, 15–25°C) but not to temperatures above 20°C (20–25, 20–30°C), and required only a 2°C temperature cycle (17–19°C). Diel substrate temperatures were above 20°C in the summer and below 20°C during the winter. Upon simultaneous exposure to a diel high-temperature cycle (20–30°C) and a light?:?dark cycle phased differently, amphipods entrained to the light?:?dark cycle. Past studies found that a temperature cycle below 20°C overrode the light?:?dark cycle for entrainment. The functional significance of this change in entrainment cues may be that while buried during the winter, the activity rhythm remains in phase with the day?:?night cycle by the substrate temperature cycles. During the summer, T. longicornis switches to the light?:?dark cycle for entrainment, perhaps as a mechanism to phase activity precisely to the short summer nights.     

Temporal reorganization of the suprachiasmatic nuclei in hamsters with split circadian rhythms.

A dual oscillator basis for mammalian circadian rhythms is suggested by the splitting of activity rhythms into two components in constant light and by the photoperiodic control of pineal melatonin secretion and phase-resetting effects of light. Because splitting and photoperiodism depend on incompatible environmental conditions, however, these literatures have remained distinct. The refinement of a procedure for splitting hamster rhythms in a 24-h light-dark:light-dark cycle has enabled the authors to assess the ability of each of two circadian oscillators to initiate melatonin secretion and to respond to light pulses with behavioral phase shifting and induction of Fos-immunoreactivity in the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN). Hamsters exposed to a regimen of afternoon novel wheel running (NWR) split their circadian rhythms into two distinct components, dividing their activity between the latter half of the night and the afternoon dark period previously associated with NWR. Plasma melatonin concentrations were elevated during both activity bouts of split hamsters but were not elevated during the afternoon period in unsplit controls. Light pulses delivered during either the nighttime or afternoon activity bout caused that activity component to phase-delay on subsequent days and induced robust expression of Fos-immunoreactivity in the SCN. Light pulses during intervening periods of locomotor inactivity were ineffective. The authors propose that NWR splits the circadian pacemaker into two distinct oscillatory components separated by approximately 180 degrees, with each expressing a short subjective night.     

Locomotor activity rhythm in two wrasses,Halichoeres tenuispinnis andPteragogus flagellifera,under various light conditions

The locomotor activity rhythms were examined by using an actograph with infra-red photo-electric switches for two species of wrasses, (Halichoeres tenuispinnis andPteragogus flagellifera) under various light conditions. InH. tenuispinnis, the locomotor activity of almost all fish under light-dark cycle regimen (LD12:12; 06:00–18:00 light, 18:00–06:00 dark) commenced somewhat earlier than the beginning of light period and continued till somewhat earlier than the beginning of the dark period. This species clearly showed free-running activity rhythms under both constant illumination (LL) and constant darkness (DD). Therefore,H. tenuispinnis appeared to have a circadian rhythm. The length of the circadian period ranged from 23 hr. 30 min. to 23 hr. 44 min. under LL, and was from 23 hr. 39 min. to 24 hr. 18 min. under DD. On the other hand, the locomotor activity ofP. flagellifera occurred mostly in the light period under LD 12:12. The activity of this species continued through LL, but was greatly suppressed in DD, so that none of the fish had any activity rhythm in both constant conditions. It was known from field observations thatH. tenuispinnis burrowed and lay in sandy bottoms, whileP. flagellifera hid and rested in bases of seagrasses and shallow crevices of rocks during the night. In the present two wrasses, it seemed that the above-mentioned difference of noctural behavior was closely related to the intensity of the endogenous factor in the activity rhythm.     

Internal Desynchronisation in Blow Fly (Calliphora vicina) Locomotor Activity Rhythms: Evidence for a Complex Circadian Pacemaker

The majority of blow flies (Calliphora vicina) display circadian locomotor activity rhythms that free-run with an unchanging period (τ) in darkness (DD), or entrain to a light-dark cycle (LD 1:23). However, a minority produce more complex patterns (spontaneous changes in τ, arrhythmicity, or 'split' rhythms) in DD, or undergo rhythm dissociation ('internal desynchronisation') when the light pulses of LD 1:23 initially illuminate the subjective night. These patterns are interpreted as evidence for a complex, multioscillatory and multicellular, structure of the insects' circadian system, and this complexity is discussed in terms of the neuronal architecture of the fly's brain.     

Food availability affects circadian clock-controlled activity and Zugunruhe in the night migratory male blackheaded bunting (Emberiza melanocephala)

This study investigated the functional linkage between food availability and activity behavior in the Palaearctic Indian night migratory blackheaded bunting (Emberiza melanocephala) subjected to artificial light-dark (LD) cycles. Two experiments were performed on photosensitive birds. In the first one, birds were exposed to short days (LD 10/14; Experiment 1A), long days (LD 13/11; Experiment 1B), or increasing daylengths (8 to 13?h light/d; Experiment 1C) and presented with food either for the whole or a restricted duration of the light period. In Experiments 1A and 1B, illumination of the light and dark periods or of the dark period, alone, was changed to assess the influence of the light environment on direct and circadian responses to food cycles. In the second experiment, birds were exposed to LD 12/12 or LD 8/16 with food availability overlapping with the light (light and food presence in phase) or dark period (light and food presence in antiphase). Also, birds were subjected to constant dim light (LL(dim)) to examine the phase of the activity rhythms under synchronizing influence of the food cycles. Similarly, the presentation of food ad libitum (free food; FF) during an experiment examined the effects of the food-restriction regimes on activity rhythms. A continuous measurement of the activity-rest pattern was done to examine both the circadian and direct effects of the food and LD cycles. Measurement of activity at night enabled assessment of the migratory phenotype, premigratory restlessness, or Zugunruhe. The results show that (i) light masked the food effects if they were present together; (ii) birds had a higher anticipatory activity and food intake during restricted feeding conditions; and (iii) food at night alone reduced both the duration and amount of Zugunruhe as compared to food during the day alone. This suggests that food affects both the daily activity and seasonal Zugunruhe, and food cycles act as a synchronizer of circadian rhythms in the absence of dominant natural environmental synchronizers, such as the light-dark cycle.     

The Drosophila dCREB2 gene affects the circadian clock

We report the role of dCREB2, the Drosophila homolog of CREB/CREM, in circadian rhythms. dCREB2 activity cycles with a 24 hr rhythm in flies, both in a light:dark cycle and in constant darkness. A mutation in dCREB2 shortens circadian locomotor rhythm in flies and dampens the oscillation of period, a known clock gene. Cycling dCREB2 activity is abolished in a period mutant, indicating that dCREB2 and Period affect each other and suggesting that the two genes participate in the same regulatory feedback loop. We propose that dCREB2 supports cycling of the Period/Timeless oscillator. These findings support CREB's role in mediating adaptive behavioral responses to a variey of environmental stimuli (stress, growth factors, drug addiction, circadian rhythms, and memory formation) in mammals and long-term memory formation and circadian rhythms in Drosophila.