Effect of Gibberellic Acid, 2,3,5-Triiodobenzoic Acid and Indole Acetic Acid on Growth and Development of Impatiens balsamina during Different Photoperiods

This paper deals with the effect of 100 mg/1 each of GA₃ TIBA and IAA singly and in combination with each other on stem elongation, development of lateral branches and floral bud initiation in Impatiens balsamina plants exposed to 8-, 16- and 24-h photoperiods. GA₃ enhances stem elongation, the enhancing effect decreasing with IAA as well as with TIBA during 8-h but increasing during 16- and 24-h photoperiods. It decreases the number of lateral branches, the decrease being greatest during 16-, less during 8- and the least during 24-h photoperiods. The time taken for floral buds to initiate with and length of branches during 16-h photoperiods. During 8-h photoperiods, IAA delays the initiation of floral buds, while GA₃ hastens it when used together with TIBA or IAA or both. GA₃ increases the number of floral buds on the main axis but decreases it on lateral branches, while TIBA decreases the number on the main axis but increases it on lateral branches. IAA reduces the number of floral buds on the main axis only when used alone, but on both the main axis as well as on lateral branches when used together with GA₃ and TIBA. Floral buds were not produced on lateral branches when plants were treated with GA₃, TIBA and IAA all together. GA₃ and TIBA induced floral buds even under non-inductive photoperiods, the number of buds and reproductive nodes being less in TIBA- than in GA₃-treated plants during 24-h photoperiods. The time taken for floral buds to initiate with GA₃ and TIBA during noninductive photoperiods is much longer than that during 8-h inductive photoperiods with or without GA₃ or TIBA application. IAA completely inhibits the GA₃- and TIBA-caused induction during 24-h, but only delays it and reduces the number of reproductive nodes and floral buds during 16-h photoperiods.     

Studies on the Transmission of Floral Effects of Photoperiod and Gibberellin from One Branch to the Other inImpatiens balsamina

In two branched plants ofImpatiens balsamina with intact apex and leaves floral buds are induced only in the branch which is either exposed to 8-h (inductive) photoperiods or receives GA₃ treatment if maintained under 24-h (non-inductive) photoperiods. GA₃ induces floral buds on the treated branch even if the leaves on that branch are removed, showing that while leaves are essential for photoperception, these are not neoessary for GA₃ to cause induction. The effect of the inductive photoperiods or GA₃ treatments to a branch is not transmitted to the other branch which is treated with water and is maintained under non-inductive photoperiods even when the latter is defoliated but is transmitted if the apioal or both the apical and axillary buds on the branch receiving inductive photoperiods or GA₃ treatment are excised. It, therefore, appears that the existence of strong sinks in the form of axillary and apical buds on the treated branch prevents the transmission of photoperiodic as well as GA₃ effects to the other branch in this plant.     

Effect of Gibberellic Acid and Monophenols on Flowering of lmpatiens balsamina in Relation to the Number of Inductive and Non-inductive Photoperiodic Cycles

A single treatment of plants with GA₃ (gibberellic acid) is not adequate to cause induction under LD (long day: 24-h photo-period) condition, but its effect is added to the sub-threshold induction caused by one SD (short day: 8-h photoperiod) cycle. Floral bud initiation is hastened, and the number of floral buds and flowers per flowering plant increases in plants receiving a single treatment with the combination GA₃+ SA (salicylic acid) accompanying a single SD cycle. However, the increase on 10 replicate basis is more marked in plants receiving three treatments with the combination GA₃+β-N (β-naphthol) and five treatments with the combination GA₃+ SA accompanying six and 10 SD cycles, respectively. The number of floral buds and flowers decreases with an increase hi the number of SD cycles, but it is higher in plants treated with GA₃, SA or GA₃+β-N than in the water-treated controls. — Under long days, treatment of plants with the combinations GA₃+ SA or GA₃+β-N accelerates the initiation as well as increases the number of floral buds. While a minimum of five treatments with GA₃ or of 25 with SA or β-N alone is needed for floral bud initiation under a 24-h photoperiod, three treatments are adequate to induce floral buds with the combination GA₃+ SA or GA₃+β-N under continuous illumination. Ten or more treatments with these combinations under a 24-h photoperiod produce more flowers than the same treatments under an 8-h photoperiod.     

Effect of GA3 and AMPs on the activities and electrophoretic patterns of acid and alkaline phosphatases in relation to flowering ofImpatiens balsamina L.

GA₃, cyclic AMP as well as 3′-AMP and 5′-AMP induced the formation of floral buds inImpatiens balsamina under strictly non-inductive photoperiods. While photoperiods and treatments with GA₃ or AMPs did not much affect acid phosphatase activity, AMPs increased the activity of alkaline phosphatase both in the stem and the leaves under both photoperiods. The phosphatase activity of the water- and GA₃-treated plants under inductive photoperiods was higher than that of the plants of the respective treatments under non-inductive photoperiods. GA₃ as well as all the three AMPs induced both in the stem and the leaves the formation of new isoenzymes of both these enzymes under both photoperiods.     

The Effect of Gibberellic Acid and Guanosine Monophosphates on Extension Growth, Leaf Production and Flowering of Impatiens balsamina

Gibberellic acid (GA₃) increases the height of Impatiens balsamina under both 8- and 24-h photoperiods. The height also increases with all guanosine monophosphates (GMPs) under 8-h photoperiods but only with 5′-GMP under 24-h photoperiods. GA₃ as well as GMPs increase the number of leaves under 8-h but not under 24-h photoperiods. GA₃ as well as GMPs induce floral buds under strictly non-inductive photoperiods and increase the number of floral buds under 8-h photoperiods. The floral bud initiation occurs earlier when cGMP is used in combination with 100 mg/l GA₃.     

Floral induction by gibberellic acid in Impatiens balsamina,a qualitative short-day plant

Summary In the qualitative short-day plant Impatiens balsamina, gibberellic acid (GA₃) not only promoted the formation of floral buds in response to suboptimal photoinductive conditions and reduced the number of SD cycles that are required for their development into flowers, but also caused initiation of floral buds under non-inductive photoperiods. In plants treated with repeated applications of GA₃, the floral buds developed into flowers irrespective of whether the apex was left intact or was removed. In those that received a single application of GA₃ the floral buds developed into flowers only in decapitated plants.     

Effect of gibberellic acid and salicylic acid on the activity and electrophoretic pattern of IAA-oxidase during floral induction inImpatiens balsamina

IAA-oxidase activity increased in the stem as well as in the leaves of plants treated with GA₃, SA and GA₃ + SA during the early stages under inductive and non-inductive photoperiods, the activity being the highest in GA₃ + SA-treated plants. An isoenzyme of IAA-oxidase with Rm 0.15 developed in the stem as well as in the leaves subsequent to 1 or 2 inductive treatments. As this band persisted till the end of the experiment, it may be associated with the initiation as well as development of floral buds. Another band (Rm 0.30) appears to be associated with the phenol (SA) as it developed in the stem as well as in the leaves of SA- and GA₃ + SA-treated plants under both photoperiods. A band with Rm 0.60 developed in the leaves but not in the stem of GA₃-, SA- and GA₃ + SA-treated plants under both photoperiods.     

Effect of Gibberellic Acid and Some Phenols on Flowering of Impatiens balsamina, a Qualitative Short-day Plant

GA₃ as well as SA (salicylic acid) and β-N (β-naphthol) induce floral buds in Impatiens balsamina under strictly non-inductive photoperiods. The floral bud initiation is accelerated when 1 mg/1 SA is used in combination with 100 mg/1 GA₃. 100 mg/1 GA₃+ 1 mg/1 SA and 100 mg/1 GA₃+ 100 mg/1 β-N increase the number of floral buds as compared with 100 mg/1 GA₃ alone.     

Effect of ínductive photoperiod and gibberellin treatment on peroxidase enzyme system in relation to floral induction inImpatiens balsamina L

Gibberellins A₃ and A₁₃ cause floral induction inImpatiens balsamina, a qualitative short day plant, under non-inductive 24-h photoperiods (continuous illumination). However, the influence of the two inductive factors,i.e. gibberellins and short days (8-h photoperiods) on the peroxidase enzyme system is different. The total peroxidase activity decreases under both inductive and non-inductive photoperiods, with or without gibberellin treatment. The electrophoretic pattern of isoperoxidases changes only in response to gibberellin treatment. Under 24-h photoperiods, treatment with gibberellins A₃ and A₁₃ causes the appearance in the stem of three additional isoenzymes of peroxidase (Rm 0.50, 0.71 and 0.76). These bands do not appear in the leaves, which are non-essential for gibberellin-caused floral induction in this plant. Under 8-h photoperiods also, gibberellins induce the appearance of new isoenzyme bandsi.e. two in the stem (Rm 0.50 and 0.76) and one in the leaves (Rm 0.05). These may be correlated with the synergistic increase in the number of floral buds in these plants in response to simultaneous exposure to two inductive factors.     

Gibberellic acid- and salicylic acid-caused formation of new proteins associated with extension growth and flowering ofImpatiens balsamina

GA₃ as well as SA increase the protein content of the stem and the leaves at 1 day under both 8- and 24-h photoperiods. A new protein band with Rm 0.47 seems to be associated with floral bud initiation as it develops within 1–3 days in the stem as well as in the leaves of plants exposed to inductive treatments regardless of whether the induction is caused by 8-h photoperiods or by treatment with GA₃ of SA under 24-h photoperiods. Another band with Rm 0.23 developed only in the stem of water-as well as GA₃- or SA-treated plants under 8-h photoperiods. It may possibly be associated with extension growth.     

Effect of Gibberellic Acid and Phosfon on the Critical Dark Period Reqnirement for Flowering of Impatiens balsamina cv. Rose

The critical dark period requirement for flowering of Impatiens balsamina L. cv. Rose, an obligate short day plant, is about 8.5 hours. While GA₃ completely substituted for the dark period requirement, Phosfon prolonged it to 9.5 hours. GA₃ hastened and Phosfon delayed the initiation of floral buds under all photoperiods. Floral buds opened into flowers only during 8 and 14 hour photoperiods in control and Phosfon-treated plants but during all photoperiods in GA₃-treated ones. The delay in floral bud initiation and flowering was correlated with shifting up of the node bearing the first floral bud and flower respectively. While GA₃ increased the numher of floral buds and flowers in all photoperiods except 8-hour, Phosfon increased their number in the 14-hour photoperiod only. The number of flowering plants decreased with increasing photoperiod regardless of GA₃ and Phosfon application. The effect of Phosfon was completely or partially overcome, depending upon the photoperiod, by simultaneous application of GA₃.     

Effects of gibberellic acid and some diphenols on the flowering of Impatiens balsamina L., a qualitative short day plant

Res, DOPA and CA resemble GA₃ in inducing floral buds in Impatiensbalsamina under strictly non-inductive photoperiods, while Catdoes not do so. 1 mg/liter Res and 100 mg/liter CA in combinationwith 100 mg/liter GA₃ even hastened the initiation of floralbuds. All the tested phenols, in combination with 100 mg/literGA₃, caused a synergistic increase in the number of floral buds. (Received November 24, 1977; )     

In vitro photoinduction of leaf tissue ofStreptocarpus nobilis

Leaf expiants from vegetative plants of the short-day plantStreptocarpus nobilis (C. B. Clarke) developed flower budsin vitro when cultured in 8 h photoperiods. Tn non-inductive photoperiods only vegetative buds were formed.In vitro photoinduction was demonstrated by giving the expiants short-day (SD) cycles and then transferring them to non-inductive photoperiods for expression of flowering. On medium containing 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) organogenesis was initiated during the photoinductive treatments. Photoinduction of leaf tissue without adventitious bud development was obtained on medium without BAP. The photoinductive state of the leaf tissue was fairly stable, being expressed after 2–3 weeks in non-inductive photoperiods when adventitious buds were formed. The quantitativein vitro flowering response to the endogenous floral stimuli, resulting from photoinduction, could provide the basis of a bioassay for presumptive flower inducing chemicals.     

Effect of varying lengths of inductive and supplementary non-inductive photoperiods on vegetative growth and flowering of Impatiens balsamina

The photoperiodic requirement for flowering in Impatiens balsaminachanges with the length of the photoperiod. Floral buds wereinitiated with two 8 hr but with four 15 hr photoperiods andflowers opened with four 8 hr but twenty-eight 15 hr photoperiods.A part of the photoperiodic requirement for floral inductionin this plant can be substituted by LDs containing 4 or morehours of darkness (10). It indicates the identical nature ofthe floral stimulus produced during the dark period, whetherit forms a part of the inductive or non-inductive cycles. Theeffect of these supplementary non-inductive photoperiodic cyclesin causing floral bud initiation also depends on the lengthof the first inductive obligatory cycle. More floral buds andflowers were produced on plants exposed to 15 hr than 8 hr photoperiods,probably due to the higher number of leaves that were producedunder the former condition of weaker induction. The shorterthe dark period in the photoperiodic cycle, the weaker the induction,the slower the rate of extension growth but the more differentiationof leaves. ¹ Present address: Department of Biology, Guru Nanak Dev University,Amritsar-143005, India. (Received November 9, 1977; )     

Promotory effect of GA13 on flowering ofAmaranthus — a short day plant

Abstact The three plant types ofAmaranthus namely,A. caudatus f.albiflorus, A. caudatus f.caudatus andA. tricolor var.tristis are qualitative short day plants with critical photoperiods 16.0, 15.5 and 15.0 h, respectively. Gibberellins A₃, A₄₊₇ and A₁₃ affect extension growth, leaf differentiation and floral induction differently. Thus, in all the three plant types ofAmaranthus, whereas, GA₃ and G₄₊₇ enhanced extension growth, GA₁₃ was completely ineffective under both, 24- and 8-h photoperiods. None of the three gibberellins could affect the leaf differentiation. In all the three plant types, flowering was promoted by GA₁₃ and not by other gibberellins tried. GA₁₃ caused promotion was manifested in two manners, firstly by lowering the critical dark period requirement in each inductive cycle, and secondly by shortening the total period taken for the initiation of inflorescence primordia under inductive photoperiods. The floral induction by gibberellins inAmaranthus is contrary to the gibberellin-anthesin concept of Chailakhyan. It is suggested that gibberellins other than GA₃ may be playing an important role in floral morphogenesis of short day plants.     

Effect of Intercalated Long Days and Light Interruption of Dark Period on Flowering, Extension Growth and Senescence of impatiens balsamina

Plants of Impatiens balsamina L. grown under long days were divided into 5 lots to receive 1, 2, 4, 8 and 16 consecutive short day (SD) cycles respectively. Each lot was divided into 5 groups to receive 1, 2, 4, 8 and 16 long day (LD) cycles subsequent to SD regime and the cycles were repeated till the end. Observations on the number, position and time of emergence of floral buds, flowers and extension growth were recorded. The floral buds are initiated and these develop into flowers even when Individual SDs are intercalated with 16 LD cycles, showing that the sub-threshold stimulus is not wiped off but becomes effectively summated through a long non-inductive period. The floral bud initiation in lots receiving less than 4 and flowering in those receiving less than 8 consecutive SD cycles are delayed with decreasing number of consecutive SDs and increasing number of intercalating LDs. This progressive delay is probably due to the delay that is caused by these treatments in the completion of requisite number of SD cycles. The first node to show floral bud initiation is shifted up with increasing intercalated LDs only in plants receiving less than 4 SD cycles and not in those receiving more. Some of the lower floral buds in plants receiving less than 8 consecutive SD cycles either abort or revert to vegetative growth. The first node to flower is, therefore, shifted up. The number of such buds increases either with a decrease in the number of consecutive SDs or an increase in the number of intercalated LDs. The number of floral buds produced in plants receiving 2 or more and flowers in those receiving 4 or more consecutive SD cycles does not differ much with the number of intercalated LDs, but decreases in those receiving less number of SDs. Some nodes bear more than one floral bud and flower. Such nodes are observed in plants receiving individual SD cycles only when intercalated with individual LDs but in all groups in plants receiving 16 consecutive SD cycles. The rate of extension growth increases with an increase in the number of consecutive SDs. The rate in plants receiving individual SDs closely resembles that of plants grown under continuous LDs and that of consecutive 16 SDs with that of control SD plants. The attainment of maximum and the consequent steep fall preceding senescence is successively delayed with an increase in the number of intercalated LDs in plants receiving 16 consecutive SD cycles. Light interruption of the dark period inhibits both the initiation of floral buds and their development Into flowers. showing that in this plant. short days are necessary both for the initiation of floral buds and their development into flowers.     

Carbon Dioxide and Flowering in Pharbitis nil Choisy

The effects of photoperiod on floral and vegetative development of Pharbitis nil were modified by atmospheric CO₂ concentrations maintained during plant growth. Short day (SD) photoperiods caused rapid flowering in Pharbitis plants growing in 0.03 or 0.1% CO₂, while plants in long day (LD) conditions remained vegetative. At 1 or 5% CO₂, however, flower buds were developed under both the SD and LD photoperiods. Flowering was earliest in the plants exposed to SD at low CO₂ concentrations which formed floral buds at stem node 3 or 4. At high CO₂ concentrations, floral buds did not form until stem node 6 or 7. Both high CO₂ concentrations and LD photoperiods tended to enhance stem elongation and leaf formation.     

IAA-oxidase in Impatiens balsamina Affected by GA3 and Tannic Acid

The activity of IAA-oxidase increased in the leaves of Impatiensbalsamina plants receiving inductive photoperiodic cycles andin plants receiving treatments with gibberellic acid (GA₃) and/ortannic acid (TA), even under non-inductive photoperiods; theactivity also increased in the stem receiving inductive photoperiodiccycles (8 h). Treatment with GA₃ and TA mimics the effect ofSD cycles in the development of some isoenzymes of IAA-oxidase.Thus a new isoenzyme at R_f 0.48 developed in the leaves andone at R_f 0.82 developed in both the stem and the leaves ofall plants receiving inductive treatments – photoperiodicor chemical – but not in water-treated controls undernon-inductive photoperiods. Another isoenzyme at R_f 0.68 developedonly in the stems. Flowering, gibberellic acid, IAA oxidase, Impatiens, phenols, photoperiod     

Genetic Regulation of Development in Sorghum bicolor: IV. GA(3) Hastens Floral Differentiation but Not Floral Development under Nonfavorable Photoperiods

Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench lines with genetic differences in photoperiod requirement were planted in the field near Plainview, Texas (about 34° northern latitude) around June 1 and treated with gibberellic acid (GA₃) solutions applied in the apical leaf whorl. GA₃ hastened the date of floral differentiation (initiation). The greatest responses to GA₃ were by 90M and 100M, the latest of the genotypes, for which floral initiation dates were hastened an average of 19.5 and 21.7 days, respectively, for the 4 years beginning in 1980. There were very small differences in dates of anthesis between control and GA₃-treated plants. Microscopic examination of apical meristems collected between the date of floral initiation of GA₃-treated plants and the later date of initiation of control plants revealed: (a) several morphological characteristics of floral differentiation in the apical meristem of treated plants, (b) consistent occurrence of vegetative morphology in control plants, (c) a few meristems from GA₃-treated plants that appeared to be regressing in floral development and thus possibly exhibiting dedifferentiation. Dedifferentiation of prepanicle primordia into leaves would explain the observed equal or greater number of leaves in GA₃-treated plants rather than the expected smaller number. It is apparent that the presence of a morphological differentiated floral meristem in sorghum does not drive subsequent floral development in the absence of inductive photoperiods. This further suggests that initial floral differentiation and subsequent floral development may be controlled separately in sorghum.     

Periodicity of response to abscisic acid in lateral buds of willow (Salix viminalis L.)

Aseptically cultured lateral buds of Salix viminalis L. collected from field-grown trees exhibited a clear periodicity in their ability to respond to exogenous abscisic acid (ABA). Buds were kept unopened by ABA only when the plants were dormant or entering dormancy. Short days alone did not induce bud dormancy in potted plants but ABA treatment following exposure to an 8-h photoperiod prevented bud opening although ABA treatment of buds from long-day plants did not. Naturally dormant buds taken from shoots of field-grown trees and cultured in the presence of ABA opened following a chilling treatment. In no cases were the induction and breaking of dormancy and response to ABA correlated with endogenous ABA levels in the buds.Abbreviations ABA abscisic acid - GA₃ gibberellic acid - HPLC high-performance liquid chromatography - LD long day - MeABA methyl ABA - PAR photosynthetically active radiation - SD short day