Annulin, a protein expressed at limb segment boundaries in the grasshopper embryo, is homologous to protein cross-linking transglutaminases.

Annulin, a protein whose general stage- and position-specific expression pattern in the grasshopper embryo is described in the companion paper, is expressed in epithelial annuli in developing limbs. Here, we show that these annuli comprise narrow circumferential bands of epithelial cells at the boundaries of limb segments. At most boundaries, expression of annulin precedes the first morphological signs of segmentation. The most distal cells in a band underlie the boundary invagination. Bands arise in a stereotyped order and, within a band, expression occurs in an ordered circumferential progression. Annulin has a molecular weight of about 97 kDa and appears to be intracellular and peripherally associated with the inner leaflet of the cell membrane. Using the monoclonal antibody 7H7, two overlapping cDNA clones encoding this protein were isolated from an embryonic Schistocerca cDNA expression library. The nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences indicate that the annulin protein does not contain either a signal sequence or a transmembrane domain. By sequence comparison, annulin appears to be a transglutaminase, one of a family of enzymes that have protein cross-linking activity. Its expression pattern within the limb and the embryo is associated with areas undergoing morphogenetic rearrangements, movements, or rapid cell division. It may stabilize cells under mechanical stress or participate in some other way in these morphogenetic activities.     

Regulation of proneural gene expression and cell fate during neuroblast segregation in the Drosophila embryo.

The Drosophila embryonic central nervous system develops from sets of progenitor neuroblasts which segregate from the neuroectoderm during early embryogenesis. Cells within this region can follow either the neural or epidermal developmental pathway, a decision guided by two opposing classes of genes. The proneural genes, including the members of the achaete-scute complex (AS-C), promote neurogenesis, while the neurogenic genes prevent neurogenesis and facilitate epidermal development. To understand the role that proneural gene expression and regulation play in the choice between neurogenesis and epidermogenesis, we examined the temporal and spatial expression pattern of the achaete (ac) regulatory protein in normal and neurogenic mutant embryos. The ac protein is first expressed in a repeating pattern of four ectodermal cell clusters per hemisegment. Even though 5-7 cells initially express ac in each cluster, only one, the neuroblast, continues to express ac. The repression of ac in the remaining cells of the cluster requires zygotic neurogenic gene function. In embryos lacking any one of five genes, the restriction of ac expression to single cells does not occur; instead, all cells of each cluster continue to express ac, enlarge, delaminate and become neuroblasts. It appears that one key function of the neurogenic genes is to silence proneural gene expression within the nonsegregating cells of the initial ectodermal clusters, thereby permitting epidermal development.     

Functions of the segment polarity genes midline and H15 in Drosophila melanogaster neurogenesis

The Drosophila melanogaster ventral nerve cord derives from neural progenitor cells called neuroblasts. Individual neuroblasts have unique gene expression profiles and give rise to distinct clones of neurons and glia. The specification of neuroblast identity provides a cell intrinsic mechanism which ultimately results in the generation of progeny which are different from each other. Segment polarity genes have a dual function in early neurogenesis: within distinct regions of the neuroectoderm, they are required both for neuroblast formation and for the specification of neuroblast identity. Previous studies of segment polarity gene function largely focused on neuroblasts that arise within the posterior part of the segment. Here we show that the segment polarity gene midline is required for neuroblast formation in the anterior-most part of the segment. Moreover, midline contributes to the specification of anterior neuroblast identity by negatively regulating the expression of Wingless and positively regulating the expression of Mirror. In the posterior-most part of the segment, midline and its paralog, H15, have partially redundant functions in the regulation of the NB marker Eagle. Hence, the segment polarity genes midline and H15 play an important role in the development of the ventral nerve cord in the anterior- and posterior-most part of the segment.     

Regulated vnd expression is required for both neural and glial specification in Drosophila.

The Drosophila embryonic CNS arises from the neuroectoderm, which is divided along the dorsal-ventral axis into two halves by specialized mesectodermal cells at the ventral midline. The neuroectoderm is in turn divided into three longitudinal stripes--ventral, intermediate, and lateral. The ventral nervous system defective, or vnd, homeobox gene is expressed from cellularization throughout early neural development in ventral neuroectodermal cells, neuroblasts, and ganglion mother cells, and later in an unrelated pattern in neurons. Here, in the context of the dorsal-ventral location of precursor cells, we reassess the vnd loss- and gain-of-function CNS phenotypes using cell specific markers. We find that over expression of vnd causes significantly more profound effects on CNS cell specification than vnd loss. The CNS defects seen in vnd mutants are partly caused by loss of progeny of ventral neuroblasts-the commissures are fused and the longitudinal connectives are aberrantly positioned close to the ventral midline. The commissural vnd phenotype is associated with defects in cells that arise from the mesectoderm, where the VUM neurons have pathfinding defects, the MP1 neurons are mis-specified, and the midline glia are reduced in number. vnd over expression results in the mis-specification of progeny arising from all regions of the neuroectoderm, including the ventral neuroblasts that normally express the gene. The CNS of embryos that over express vnd is highly disrupted, with weak longitudinal connectives that are placed too far from the ventral midline and severely reduced commissural formation. The commissural defects seen in vnd gain-of-function mutants correlate with midline glial defects, whereas the mislocalization of interneurons coincides with longitudinal glial mis-specification. Thus, Drosophila neural and glial specification requires that vnd expression by tightly regulated.     

Cyto-differentiation of the neuroblasts from the neural ectodermal cells in grasshopper,Chortophaga viridifasciata (De Geer) (Orthoptera: Acrididae) embryos

The first sign of neurogenesis in the embryo of grasshopper, Chortophaga viridifasciata (Orthoptera: Acrididae), is signaled by a partition of the ectodermal cells into non-neural ectodermal cells and neural eetodermal cells. The neuroblasts are differentiated from neural ectodermal cells. In the present study, we examined the pattern of mitotic activity in the developing embryo by tracing the incorporation of BrdU in S phase nuclei. The results indicate that the ectodermal cells in 6-day old embryos do not show any signs of differentiation. In 7-day old embryos, in which ectodermal cells become partitioned into 2 types, almost no neural ectodermal cells are incorporated with BrdU, whereas a constant incorporation is revealed in non-neural ectodermal cells. Among the mitotically quiescent neural ectodermal cells, which are arrested at the GI stage of the cell cycle, in 8-day old embryos, the neuroblasts are the first to resume their mitotic activity, while the other cells are then released from the mitotic quiescence. It seems that the mitotic quiescence may be an essential process to acquire a neural fate.     

CNS midline cells contribute to maintenance of the initial dorsoventral patterning of the Drosophila ventral neuroectoderm

Dorsoventral patterning of the Drosophila ventral neuroectoderm is established by the expression of three evolutionarily conserved homeodomain genes: ventral nervous system defective (vnd), intermediate neuroblasts defective (ind), and muscle segment homeobox (msh) in the medial, intermediate, and lateral columns of the ventral neuroectoderm, respectively. It was not clear whether extrinsic factor(s) from the CNS midline cells influence the initial dorsoventral patterning by controlling the expression of the dorsoventral patterning genes. We show here that the CNS midline cells, specified by single-minded (sim), are essential for maintaining expression of the dorsoventral patterning genes. Ectopic expression of sim in the ventral neuroectoderm during the blastoderm stage repressed expression of the three homeodomain genes in the ventral neuroectoderm. This indicates that the identity of the CNS midline cells is established by a series of repressions of the three homeodomain genes in the ventral neuroectoderm. Ectopic expression of sim in the ventral neuroectoderm during initial neurogenesis induced ectopic ind expression in the medial column in addition to that in the intermediate column via EGFR signaling between the ventral neuroectoderm and midline cells. In contrast, it repressed the expression of vnd and msh in the medial and lateral columns, respectively. Our findings demonstrate that the CNS midline cells provide extrinsic positional information via EGFR signaling that maintains the initial subdivision of the ventral neuroectoderm into three dorsoventral columns during initial neurogenesis.     

A protein complex containing Inscuteable and the Galpha-binding protein Pins orients asymmetric cell divisions in Drosophila

BACKGROUND: In the fruit fly Drosophila, the Inscuteable protein localises to the apical cell cortex in neuroblasts and directs both the apical-basal orientation of the mitotic spindle and the basal localisation of the protein determinants Numb and Prospero during mitosis. Asymmetric localisation of Inscuteable is initiated during neuroblast delamination by direct binding to Bazooka, an apically localised protein that contains protein-interaction motifs known as PDZ domains. How apically localised Inscuteable directs asymmetric cell divisions is unclear. RESULTS: A novel 70 kDa protein called Partner of Inscuteable (Pins) and a heterotrimeric G-protein alpha subunit were found to bind specifically to the functional domain of Inscuteable in vivo. The predicted sequence of Pins contained tetratrico-peptide repeats (TPRs) and motifs implicated in binding Galpha proteins. Pins colocalised with Inscuteable at the apical cell cortex in interphase and mitotic neuroblasts. Asymmetric localisation of Pins required both Inscuteable and Bazooka. In epithelial cells, which do not express inscuteable, Pins was not apically localised but could be recruited to the apical cortex by ectopic expression of Inscuteable. In pins mutants, these epithelial cells were not affected, but neuroblasts showed defects in the orientation of their mitotic spindle and the basal asymmetric localisation of Numb and Miranda during metaphase. Although localisation of Inscuteable in pins mutants was initiated correctly during neuroblast delamination, Inscuteable became homogeneously distributed in the cytoplasm during mitosis. CONCLUSIONS: Pins and Inscuteable are dependent on each other for asymmetric localisation in delaminated neuroblasts. The binding of Pins to Galpha protein offers the intriguing possibility that Inscuteable and Pins might orient asymmetric cell divisions by localising or locally modulating a heterotrimeric G-protein signalling cascade at the apical cell cortex.     

Differential expression of alternate forms of a Drosophila src protein during embryonic and larval tissue differentiation

The Dsrc28C gene encodes two major proteins, p66 and p55, each of which contains a tyrosine kinase domain. Using monoclonal antibodies we have completed a detailed investigation of the spatial expression of Dsrc28C proteins during embryonic and larval development. Differentiation of a number of embryonic tissues is accompanied by the induction of Dsrc28C expression. With the exception of the developing salivary glands which express high levels of p66, developing tissues express the p55 form of Dsrc28C. Notable examples are cells of the and peripheral nervous systems which express p55 from the early stages of neurogenesis through the remainder of embryogenesis and pole cells which transiently express p55 during portions of embryonic stages 10 and 11. Nervous system expression includes the cell bodies and neuronal fibers of the central nervous system, the anterior sensory organs, and the peripheral sensory neurons. During larval development, p55 levels within the central nervous system remain high but substantial changes in the pattern of expression take place. p55 gradually disappears from the neuronal fibers of the central nervous system and from embryonic cell bodies. During the third larval instar, the birth of immature neuroblasts within the ventral and midbrain ganglia, but not within the optic ganglia, is marked by a transient high level of p55 expression. All imaginal cells that have been observed within the larva express the p66 protein. The patterns of expression that we have noted suggest that expression of the p55 form of Dsrc28C protein is an early event in the differentiation of neuronal cells, while expression of the p66 form is characteristic of cells committed to ectodermal cell differentiation.     

Comparison of early nerve cord development in insects and vertebrates

It is widely held that the insect and vertebrate CNS evolved independently. This view is now challenged by the concept of dorsoventral axis inversion, which holds that ventral in insects corresponds to dorsal in vertebrates. Here, insect and vertebrate CNS development is compared involving embryological and molecular data. In insects and vertebrates, neurons differentiate towards the body cavity. At early stages of neurogenesis, neural progenitor cells are arranged in three longitudinal columns on either side of the midline, and NK-2/NK-2.2, ind/Gsh and msh/Msx homologs specify the medial, intermediate and lateral columns, respectively. Other pairs of regional specification genes are, however, expressed in transverse stripes in insects, and in longitudinal stripes in the vertebrates. There are differences in the regional distribution of cell types in the developing neuroectoderm. However, within a given neurogenic column in insects and vertebrates some of the emerging cell types are remarkably similar and may thus be phylogenetically old: NK-2/NK-2.2-expressing medial column neuroblasts give rise to interneurons that pioneer the medial longitudinal fascicles, and to motoneurons that exit via lateral nerve roots to then project peripherally. Lateral column neuroblasts produce, among other cell types, nerve root glia and peripheral glia. Midline precursors give rise to glial cells that enwrap outgrowing commissural axons. The midline glia also express netrin homologs to attract commissural axons from a distance.     

Expression of a neurofilament protein by the precursors of a subpopulation of ventral spinal cord neurons

The expression of neurofilament proteins (NF-H, NF-M, and NF-L) in replicating neuroepithelial cells and postmitotic neuroblasts in the embryonic chick trunk neural tube was examined by immunohistochemistry. Anti-NF-M, in particular, resulted in bright staining of some mitotic cells, which were found to be strictly localized to a midventral and an extreme dorsal position in the neural tube. Those in the midventral position were observed with greatest frequency during Days 3 and 4 of incubation and became increasingly rare thereafter. During the same period of time, and in the same small ventral region, NF-M-positive interphase cells, presumably migrating postmitotic neuroblasts, were also present. In contrast, NF-L-positive mitotic cells were rarely seen. NF-L-positive migrating and differentiating neuroblasts were observed throughout the ventral half of the neural tube except in the midventral area containing NF-M-positive mitotic cells and NF-M-positive migrating neuroblasts. These results, together with known temporal and spatial patterns of neurogenesis in the spinal cord, suggest that the expression of NF-L and NF-M, in the form recognized by our antibodies, may not be initiated coordinately, or even in the same sequence, in different types of neuroblasts, and that only the immediate precursors of a specific subpopulation of ventral spinal cord neurons begin expressing NF-M in the terminal cell cycle. In addition, the NF-M-positive mitotic cells, when observed in anaphase and telophase, had NF-M-positive material associated with both emerging daughter cells and the migrating neuroblasts were frequently found in closely associated pairs, consistent with the suggestion that these precursor cells undergo a symmetrical terminal division to yield two daughter postmitotic neuroblasts.     

Progenitor properties of symmetrically dividing Drosophila neuroblasts during embryonic and larval development

Asymmetric cell division generates two daughter cells of differential gene expression and/or cell shape. Drosophila neuroblasts undergo typical asymmetric divisions with regard to both features; this is achieved by asymmetric segregation of cell fate determinants (such as Prospero) and also by asymmetric spindle formation. The loss of genes involved in these individual asymmetric processes has revealed the roles of each asymmetric feature in neurogenesis, yet little is known about the fate of the neuroblast progeny when asymmetric processes are blocked and the cells divide symmetrically. We genetically created such neuroblasts, and found that in embryos, they were initially mitotic and then gradually differentiated into neurons, frequently forming a clone of cells homogeneous in temporal identity. By contrast, larval neuroblasts with the same genotype continued to proliferate without differentiation. Our results indicate that asymmetric divisions govern lineage length and progeny fate, consequently generating neural diversity, while the progeny fate of symmetrically dividing neuroblasts depends on developmental stages, presumably reflecting differential activities of Prospero in the nucleus.     

Fast neurogenesis from carotid body quiescent neuroblasts accelerates adaptation to hypoxia

Unlike other neural peripheral organs, the adult carotid body (CB) has a remarkable structural plasticity, as it grows during acclimatization to hypoxia. The CB contains neural stem cells that can differentiate into oxygen‐sensitive glomus cells. However, an extended view is that, unlike other catecholaminergic cells of the same lineage (sympathetic neurons or chromaffin cells), glomus cells can divide and thus contribute to CB hypertrophy. Here, we show that O₂‐sensitive mature glomus cells are post‐mitotic. However, we describe an unexpected population of pre‐differentiated, immature neuroblasts that express catecholaminergic markers and contain voltage‐dependent ion channels, but are unresponsive to hypoxia. Neuroblasts are quiescent in normoxic conditions, but rapidly proliferate and differentiate into mature glomus cells during hypoxia. This unprecedented “fast neurogenesis” is stimulated by ATP and acetylcholine released from mature glomus cells. CB neuroblasts, which may have evolved to facilitate acclimatization to hypoxia, could contribute to the CB oversensitivity observed in highly prevalent human diseases.     

Regulated vnd expression is required for both neural and glial specification in Drosophila

The Drosophila embryonic CNS arises from the neuroectoderm, which is divided along the dorsal‐ventral axis into two halves by specialized mesectodermal cells at the ventral midline. The neuroectoderm is in turn divided into three longitudinal stripes—ventral, intermediate, and lateral. The ventral nervous system defective, or vnd, homeobox gene is expressed from cellularization throughout early neural development in ventral neuroectodermal cells, neuroblasts, and ganglion mother cells, and later in an unrelated pattern in neurons. Here, in the context of the dorsal‐ventral location of precursor cells, we reassess the vnd loss‐ and gain‐of‐function CNS phenotypes using cell specific markers. We find that over expression of vnd causes significantly more profound effects on CNS cell specification than vnd loss. The CNS defects seen in vnd mutants are partly caused by loss of progeny of ventral neuroblasts—the commissures are fused and the longitudinal connectives are aberrantly positioned close to the ventral midline. The commissural vnd phenotype is associated with defects in cells that arise from the mesectoderm, where the VUM neurons have pathfinding defects, the MP1 neurons are mis‐specified, and the midline glia are reduced in number. vnd over expression results in the mis‐specification of progeny arising from all regions of the neuroectoderm, including the ventral neuroblasts that normally express the gene. The CNS of embryos that over express vnd is highly disrupted, with weak longitudinal connectives that are placed too far from the ventral midline and severely reduced commissural formation. The commissural defects seen in vnd gain‐of‐function mutants correlate with midline glial defects, whereas the mislocalization of interneurons coincides with longitudinal glial mis‐specification. Thus, Drosophila neural and glial specification requires that vnd expression by tightly regulated. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Neurobiol 50: 118–136, 2002; DOI 10.1002/neu.10022     

Expression of NLRP3 Inflammasomes in Neurogenic Niche Contributes to the Effect of Spatial Learning in Physiological Conditions but Not in Alzheimer’s Type Neurodegeneration

A common feature of neurodegenerative disorders, in particular Alzheimer's disease (AD), is a chronic neuroinflammation associated with aberrant neuroplasticity. Development of neuroinflammation affects efficacy of stem and progenitor cells proliferation, differentiation, migration, and integration of newborn cells into neural circuitry. However, precise mechanisms of neurogenesis alterations in neuroinflammation are not clear yet. It is well established that expression of NLRP3 inflammasomes in glial cells marks neuroinflammatory events, but less is known about contribution of NLRP3 to deregulation of neurogenesis within neurogenic niches and whether neural stem cells (NSCs), neural progenitor cells (NPCs) or immature neuroblasts may express inflammasomes in (patho)physiological conditions. Thus, we studied alterations of neurogenesis in rats with the AD model (intra-hippocampal injection of Aβ1-42). We found that in Aβ-affected brain, number of CD133+ cells was elevated after spatial training in the Morris water maze. The number of PSA-NCAM+ neuroblasts diminished by Aβ injection was completely restored by subsequent spatial learning. Spatial training leads to elevated expression of NLRP3 inflammasomes in the SGZ (subgranular zones): CD133+ and PSA-NCAM+ cells started to express NLRP3 in sham-operated, but not AD rats. Taken together, our data suggest that expression of NLRP3 inflammasomes in CD133+ and PSA-NCAM+ cells may contribute to stimulation of adult neurogenesis in physiological conditions, whereas Alzheimer’s type neurodegeneration abolishes stimuli-induced overexpression of NLRP3 within the SGZ neurogenic niche.

     

Prospero and Snail expression during spider neurogenesis

Analysis of early neurogenesis in the spider Cupiennius salei (Chelicerata, Aranea, Ctenidae) has shown that the cells of the central nervous system are recruited from clusters of cells that invaginate from the neuroectoderm. This is in contrast to Drosophila, where only single cells delaminate and become neuroblasts, the stem cells of the nervous system. In order to compare the processes further, we have cloned homologues of the pan-neural Drosophila genes prospero and snail from the spider and have analysed their RNA and protein expression pattern. We find that snail expression is transient and only a subset of neural cells expresses Snail protein at any given time, making it difficult to assess whether it is indeed a pan-neural gene in the spider. Prospero protein expression, on the other hand, is seen in all invaginating cells and continues throughout differentiation of the neurons. In contrast to Drosophila, asymmetric localization cannot be detected, even in cells that still divide. Our results provide no evidence for neuroblasts or stem cells in the spider, although there are a limited number of mitoses in the cells that are derived from the invaginating clusters. These aspects of spider neurogenesis are more similar to the neurogenesis process known from vertebrates.Edited by P. Simpson